The Reading Teacher - 2011 - Nauman - What Makes Writing Good An Essential Question For Teachers

19362714, 2011, 5, Downloaded from https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1598/RT.64.5.2 by The Chinese University Of Hong Kong, Wiley Online Library on [02/12/2022].
See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
What Makes Writing Good?
An Essential Question for Teachers
April D. Nauman, Terry Stirling, Arlene Borthwick
Teachers should question and n.d.; Spandel, 2009b). Often, classroom teachers, es-
pecially those who lack confidence as writers them-
critique “expert” views of what selves, eagerly embrace experts’ definitions without
makes writing good, especially when question. However, adopting these definitions uncrit-
teaching elementary students. ically is not necessarily in the best interest of young
writers, especially those who struggle.
Our purpose in this article is twofold:
W
hat makes writing good? The answer to this 1. To discuss contemporary views of what makes
can seem hard to pin down, especially for writing good
teachers who don’t perceive themselves
2. To report a research study comparing different
as writers. Memories of college composition classes
perspectives on what constitutes good writing
and lists of complicated rules haunt many of us. Is
it acceptable to end a sentence with a preposition? We begin with an important point that undergirds
How many sentences are required for a paragraph? our discussion and reflects the theoretical frame-
How do you write with voice? Are essays supposed work for our research: When teachers assess student
to have five paragraphs or not? And what is a split writing, subjectivity is unavoidable.
infinitive?
The question of what makes writing good may
sound esoteric, but it touches on the most important Reader Response
areas of classroom writing instruction. Without a in Writing Assessment
clear idea of what constitutes good writing, teachers Literacy teachers have long understood that reading
feel uncertain about assessing and grading student comprehension relies on the reader’s construction
work, deciding what to teach in minilessons, and of meaning. To make meaning of text, readers con-
responding to students in writing conferences. If a nect what they read to their unique prior knowledge
teacher’s responses are confusing or discouraging to and experiences. Reader-response theorist Louise
young writers, their sense of self-efficacy and motiva- Rosenblatt, whose transactional theory extended
tion to write may suffer (Cunningham & Cunningham, schema theory (Tracey & Morrow, 2006) to reading,
2010), which will affect the quality of their writing. famously defined reading as “a transaction between
Everyone agrees students should be able to produce the reader and what he senses the words as point-
good writing. But what is good writing? ing to” (Rosenblatt, 1978, p. 21). This is why different
Today’s writing experts (e.g., Atwell, 1998, 2002; readers’ understandings of the same text vary: The
Burke, 2003; Calkins, 1994, 2007, 2008a, 2008b; meaning of a text is not inherent in it but constructed
Culham, 2003, 2008; Spandel, 2008, 2009a, 2009b) by readers as they apply their unique background
provide definitions, stated or implied, of what con- knowledge to make meaning of it.
stitutes good writing. The 6 + 1 Traits model offers a If meaning is not inherent in text, then goodness,
research-tested definition of it (Arter, Spandel, Culham, or value, is not either. Whether someone thinks a
& Pollard, 1994; Culham, 2008; Education Northwest, book is good or not depends on that person’s prior
The Reading Teacher, 64(5), pp. 318–328 © 2011 International Reading Association
318 DOI:10.1598/RT.64.5.2 ISSN: 0034-0561 print / 1936-2714 online
19362714, 2011, 5, Downloaded from https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1598/RT.64.5.2 by The Chinese University Of Hong Kong, Wiley Online Library on [02/12/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
knowledge, experiences, and a vari- (author of Charlotte’s Web and Stuart
ety of other subjective factors. This PAUSE AND PONDER Little) rediscovered Strunk’s book in
same dynamic operates when teach- 1957 and revised it for publication in
■■ What do you think makes
ers assess student writing. Teachers’ 1959 (Elledge, 1984; Strunk & White,
evaluations of student writing will writing good? Compare
2000).
your views with those
vary, because they are responding to Among the instructions for writ-
of your colleagues.
it from their differing perspectives. ing well in Strunk and White (2000)
■■ What are some effective
However, prominent writing edu- is “write with nouns and verbs…. In
ways to make your
cators often refer to the elements of general...it is nouns and verbs, not
writing expectations
good writing as though they are in- their assistants, that give good writ-
clear to your students?
herent in text. This is especially true ing its toughness and color” (pp. 71–
■■ What are some
of the 6 + 1 Traits model of assess- 72). These aspects of style, adopted
disadvantages of training
ment, commonly used in schools an entire school faculty by educators such as Nancie Atwell
today (Burke, 2003; Culham, 2003, to use a set of writing and Lucy Calkins, also appear as
2008; Spandel, 2009b). In this model, rubrics to evaluate student criteria in the 6 + 1 Traits rubrics. To
the key qualities that define strong writing in the same way? achieve a high score in word choice,
writing are ideas, organization, for example, a student needs to have
voice, word choice, sentence fluen- not too many adjectives.
cy, conventions, and presentation (see www.thetraits However, teachers can rightly question whether
.org for complete definitions; Education Northwest, it’s a good idea to dissuade young writers from using
n.d.). In the 6 + 1 Traits book Creating Young Writers, entire categories of words. Strunk and White (2000)
Vicki Spandel (2008) explained, “It is not the traits wrote their book for college students and adults. Is it
themselves that are new but the rubrics that describe applicable to elementary students? Using words is the
them. It’s a little like sketching a new map reflecting best way for children to learn and remember vocabu-
geographic features that have been around for ages” lary, which is especially important for nonnative and
(p. 3). nonstandard English speakers. Furthermore, teach-
Spandel’s (2008) metaphor suggests that these ers often encourage children to “paint a picture” with
particular traits of good writing are not only inherent their writing. It’s easy to imagine the confusion of a
in text but also universal and eternal. This type of lan- sixth grader who is told to help the reader visualize
guage obscures the inevitable role of subjectivity in but to not use too many adjectives.
writing assessment. In fact, what one person thinks is William Zinsser provided a quote (cited in
good writing is not necessarily what another person Spandel, 2009b) that helps us understand the intent
does. behind the warning against too many adjectives:
Most adjectives are...sprinkled into sentences by writ-

ers who don’t stop to think that the concept is already
Questioning a Standardized in the noun. This kind of prose is littered with precipi-
Writing Style tous cliffs and lacy spider webs...yellow daffodils and
brownish dirt. If you want to make a value judgment
When expert definitions of good writing are ac- about daffodils, choose an adjective like “garish.”
cepted uncritically, particular styles of writing can (p. 190)
start to become “standardized.” Most prominent
writing educators today (e.g., Lucy Calkins, Nancie As funny as the phrase brownish dirt is, Zinsser’s
Atwell, Jim Burke) define good writing in terms of a other examples raise the question again of the read-
particular prose style: one that is concise, with few er’s subjectivity. Daffodils may contain the concept
adjectives and adverbs, “lively” verbs, and plain lan- of yellowness, but readers who don’t know that (e.g.,
guage. This is a 20th-century style (prose styles in 12-year-old readers who live in the inner city) may
previous centuries were quite different) popularized compliment the writer for including yellow to paint a
by William Strunk and E.B. White’s influential book, vivid picture. To them, the adjective makes the writ-
The Elements of Style. Strunk began writing this book ing better. Similarly, adding lacy to spider web may
for his Cornell University students in 1918. E.B. White help developing readers better visualize it—and it
What Makes Writing Good? An Essential Question for Teachers 319

might strike them as original and insightful. What is a but to investigate the subjective experiences of small-
third grader to think when the teacher says this adjec- er numbers of participants selected for certain char-
tive is weak after half the class thought it was strong? acteristics to test and generate theories (Kerlinger,
Is it weak or strong? It depends on the reader. 1986).
In a Q study, participants are given a question
(in this case, “What do you think makes writing
Questioning Standardized good?”) and are asked to read through a set of state-
Responses to Student Writing ments expressing opinions about that question (e.g.,
Advocates of 6 + 1 Traits encourage school faculties “Good writing is concise.” “Writers shouldn’t try to
to adopt the model so teachers and students can write about too big of a topic.”). Each statement is
share a common vision and language for what makes printed on a separate small card. The participants
writing good (Culham, 2003, 2008; Spandel, 2009b). then physically sort the statements, placing them on
Faculties are to be trained in the use of the rubrics to a continuum from “most agree” to “most disagree.”
become more consistent and reliable in their results Participants also explain the thinking behind their
(Spandel, 2009b). This way, we can feel we’re all “on rankings. The sets of rankings are then analyzed sta-
the same page.” tistically to identify groups of participants who sorted
But in the real world, readers are not all on the the cards in a similar way, thus revealing different
same page. They respond differently to the same text. perspectives or viewpoints on a given topic.
Many variables play a role in how readers respond
to a text, including prior knowledge, experiences, at-
titudes, and psychology. To further investigate differ- Procedures and Participants
ing views of what makes writing good, we conducted Our set of statements included 31 items (see Figure 1).
a research study of classroom teachers, preservice These statements were obtained from the written re-
teachers, and professional writers. flections of 75 classroom teachers from the Chicago
area (kindergarten through high school) as well as
six professional (published) writers. These teachers
The Q Study and writers were asked to write for about 5 minutes
For this study, we used Q methodology, which seeks on the question “In your opinion, what makes writ-
to capture “the experience of subjectivity” (Brown, ing good?” We analyzed the responses for common
1993, p. 194). This approach is different from that themes or categories using constant comparative
used by the original traits researchers (Diederich, analysis (Glaser & Strauss, 2009). All statements were
French, & Carlton, 1961), whose work was used as color-coded based on similarities or lack thereof
a basis for the 6 + 1 Traits model. Diederich and and reviewed several times to identify common
colleagues’ research method was designed to find themes. Statements representing each major theme
commonality among participants’ opinions of what were reproduced on cards. Additional statements
constitutes good writing. Using Q methodology, we were also derived from popular textbooks on writing
were able to identify different, distinct perspectives instruction.
on this issue. After developing our set of statements, we invit-
ed 60 participants to perform the card sort. Twelve
Q Methodology professional/published writers, 26 current classroom
Q methodology uses factor analysis to examine data teachers, and 22 preservice teachers were included.
(Brown, 1993). However, unlike traditional factor All the professional/published writers were also
analysis, in which items load on factors, Q meth- current or former teachers (full time or adjunct) of
odology seeks to determine “relationships among college-level writing or education classes. This group
people who rank-order specified variables in similar included 6 creative writers, who published primarily
ways” (Borthwick, Stirling, Nauman, & Cook, 2003). fiction, creative nonfiction, or poetry; 5 academic
Combining the strengths of qualitative and quantita- writers, who had published primarily in their aca-
tive research traditions, this methodology is not in- demic field (education or literature); and 1 newspa-
tended to make generalizations to large populations, per journalist.
320 The Reading Teacher Vol. 64, No. 5 February 2011
Figure 1
Q Statements
1. A good paper has a strong, logical overall organization that is clear to the reader, so the reader knows what to
expect.
2. I personally like when a writer adds something to their writing which shows some personality (humor, wit, ideals,
values). I guess it depends on the piece, but I have read various types of writing that include some of the author’s
voice.
3. Good writing is clear and easy to understand. Readers don’t have to struggle to get what the author is saying.
4. A lot of students write exactly how they talk and it doesn’t make any sense—writers need to be able to use
appropriate verb tenses and other proper grammar.
5. Good writing shows a sense of audience. To effectively communicate your message, you need to know who
you’re writing for.
6. A lot of juicy verbs help make writing good.
7. Good writing stays focused on the main idea/topic throughout.
8. Good writing is concise, using an economy of words. It avoids repetition and redundancy.
9. Good writing has a strong introduction that states the topic and a strong conclusion that sums up or reiterates
the important points.
10. The paper should have a flow. If the paper jumps from one idea to another, it makes it hard to read, just like a
piece of music that doesn’t transition well and then loses the melody.
11. Good writers avoid clichés.
12. Writers shouldn’t try to write about too big of a topic—they need to choose little moments to describe or
specific topics to write about.
13. A variety of sentence types engages the reader (simple, complex, dependent clauses)—you want to avoid too
many short choppy sentences.
14. Adjectives tend to clutter up a text—good writers use very few adjectives.
15. Some kids’ writing is too chatty for formal reports and research papers—voice in writing has to be appropriate to
the purpose for writing.
16. Writing that is too structured (like a five-paragraph essay) tends to be boring.
17. Writing needs to be free of errors in conventions or mechanics—punctuation, grammar, and spelling affect the
piece overall.
18. A good writer surprises the reader with unexpected moves. This can be accomplished by using metaphors/
similes, unusual vocabulary, mixing different modes of discourse (from the vernacular to the academic), varying
sentence structures, employing humor.
19. Really, it all depends on the type of writing—every type of writing requires different things to be good.
20. Good writing contains details, elaboration, support, whether narrative or expository, enough elaboration to help
the reader paint a picture in their mind or (for expository) provide sufficient support to explain ideas.
21. I think writing needs to have complete sentences to be considered good.
22. Writing is good when you can see critical thinking on the part of the writer.
23. Good writing is like good thinking—fresh, clear, and honest. It artfully invites the reader into an idea or image
with a quiet authority that cannot be resisted.
24. You need to have a point! Don’t write just to fill up a page.
25. You don’t see a lot of adverbs in good writing—adverbs are a sign the verbs are weak.
26. Good writing must conform to a genre, be that fiction or nonfiction; be it a memoir, historical fiction, an e-mail,
an essay, a poem, an article, and so on.
27. Good writing shows instead of tells.
28. Good writing is descriptive, with figurative language, and compels the reader to make vivid mental images.
29. Good writing gives you the impression that time was spent crafting the piece.
30. It’s good when the writer is obviously knowledgeable about the subject.
31. Accurate word choice is key—the words have to be chosen precisely to convey the author’s meaning.

The current elementary school teachers were en- Data Analysis and Interpretation
rolled in a master’s level course on how to teach writ- The card sort data were analyzed using PQMethod
ing. The card sort activity was completed during the 2.11, a statistical software program. In the three-factor
first class, before instruction began. Sixteen teachers solution, 50% of variance was explained. Fifty-four of
taught in high-needs public schools in Chicago, with the 60 participants loaded on one of the three factors
mostly minority, low-income children. The other 10 (i.e., were identified as belonging to one of the three
teachers worked in suburban schools, with mixed- groups). The different factors, or groups, emerged be-
income students of various ethnicities. The 22 pre- cause the group members sorted the card statements
service teachers were enrolled in an undergraduate in a similar way. Thus, each group had a different
education course. Like the current teachers, these perspective on the question of what makes writing
participants were students at Northeastern Illinois good. Interestingly, each group contained two to four
University, a state university in Chicago. professional/published writers. The different perspec-
Each participant received her or his own deck tives expressed by the three groups are analyzed in
of cards and was asked to rank the statements from the following sections.
“most agree” to “most disagree.” Participants re-
corded statement numbers on a ranking response
sheet and wrote explanations for why they chose
Perspective 1: Good Writing =
their five most-agreed and five most-disagreed state- Good Thinking and
ments. Data were also collected on participants’ Communicating
teaching experience, attitudes toward writing and The 24 participants in the first group emphasized
teaching writing, and level of writing education and the connection between writing and thinking
expertise. (see Table 1). They most strongly agreed with the
Table 1
Perspective 1 Distinguishing Statements
+2 +1 0 –1 –2
(Most agree) (Agree) (Neutral) (Disagree) (Most disagree)
23. Good writing 19. It all depends 24. You need to have 9. Good writing 4. Writers need to
is like good on the type of a point! has a strong be able to use
thinking—fresh, writing. introduction, appropriate verb
clear, and honest. 7. Good writing stating the topic, tenses and other
30. It’s good when stays focused. and a strong proper grammar.
2. I like when a the writer conclusion,
writer adds is obviously 16. Writing that is summing up or 17. Writing needs to
something to knowledgeable too structured reiterating the be free of errors
their writing about the (like a five- important points. in conventions or
which shows subject. paragraph essay) mechanics.
some personality. tends to be
10. The paper should boring. 21. Writing needs to
5. Good writing have a flow. have complete
shows a sense of 6. A lot of juicy sentences to be
audience. 1. A good paper verbs help make considered good.
has a strong, writing good.
18. A good writer logical overall
surprises the organization.
reader.
Note. Statements are abbreviated. Participants rank-ordered each item in comparison to all other items.
statements “Good writing is like good thinking,” “I... language, they resisted statements that sounded like
like when a writer adds something to their writing rules or prescriptions that would limit creativity.
which shows some personality (humor, wit, ideals, Four professional writers were in this group, in-
values),” “Good writing shows a sense of audience,” cluding 3 creative writers and the journalist. In addi-
and “A good writer surprises the reader with unex- tion, 7 teachers in high-needs schools, all 10 teachers
pected moves.” This group most strongly disagreed in the suburban schools, and 3 preservice teachers
held this perspective of what makes writing good.
with the need for correct conventions and complete
All teachers of affluent or middle class, mostly white
sentences.
children were in this group, as were most teachers of
In the participants’ explanations for their rank-
mostly white or Latino children.
ings, they emphasized writing as interpersonal—as
an act of communication between writer and reader;
thus, sense of audience was considered extremely Perspective 2: Good Writing =
important. In this view, good writing is more about Structure and Clarity
communicating thoughts and ideas to particular The 21 participants in the second group emphasized
readers than mastering a particular set of traits. This organization and ease of understanding (see Table 2).
group valued surprise in writing, appreciating au- They most strongly agreed with the statements “A
thors who challenged reader expectations. Because good paper has a strong, logical overall organization
this group valued imagination and creative uses of that is clear to the reader, so the reader knows what
Table 2
+2 +1 0 –1 –2
1. A good paper 17. Writing needs to 5. Good writing 18. A good writer 27. Good writing
has a strong, be free of errors shows a sense of surprises the shows instead of
logical overall in conventions or audience. reader. tells.
organization. mechanics.
28. Good writing is 6. A lot of juicy verbs
9. Good writing 7. Good writing descriptive. help make writing
has a strong stays focused. good.
introduction, 4. Writers need to
stating the topic, 22. You can see be able to use
and a strong critical thinking appropriate verb
conclusion, on the part of the tenses and other
summing up or writer. proper grammar.
reiterating the
important points. 24. You need to have 2. I like when a
a point! writer adds
3. Good writing is something to
clear and easy to 19. It all depends their writing
understand. on the type of which shows
writing. some personality.
30. It’s good when
the writer
is obviously
knowledgeable
about the
subject.

to expect,” “Good writing has a strong introduction, this perspective did not want reader expectations to
stating the topic, and a strong conclusion, summing be disrupted by surprises in the text, feeling that sur-
up or reiterating the important points,” and “Good prises may cause confusion.
writing is clear and easy to understand.” This group This group consisted of 4 professional writers—3
disagreed strongly with the statements “Good writing academic and 1 creative—as well as 5 teachers in
shows instead of tells” and “A lot of juicy verbs help high-needs schools and 12 preservice teachers. More
make writing good.” teachers of mostly African American children were
In this perspective, clarity and ease of under- in this group than in either of the other groups.
standing most characterize good writing, and a
predictable structure helps the writer achieve that
clarity. Focus, purpose, having a point, and having Perspective 3: Good Writing =
knowledge of the topic are also seen as keys to clar- Purpose, Voice, and
ity. In their explanations for their rankings, members
of this group often expressed concern over loss of fo-
Correctness
cus, which could result in “babbling,” as one partici- The nine participants in the third group valued clear
pant phrased it. The need for a strong introduction to purpose, voice, and correct writing mechanics (see
set readers’ expectations was important, in this view, Table 3). They most strongly agreed with the state-
because readers need to know what to expect. Flow, ments “Good writing contains details, elaboration,
cohesiveness, and logic in the order of the writing are support, whether narrative or expository...,” “You
also hallmarks of good writing in this perspective. need to have a point! Don’t write just to fill up a page,”
Interestingly, this group did not think that and “Writing needs to be free of errors in conventions
knowing your audience was all that important. To or mechanics—punctuation, grammar, and spelling
them, good writing would be good enough—clear affect the piece overall.” They agreed with two state-
enough—to any reader. In addition, participants with ments that group 1 had strongly agreed with: “A good
Table 3
+2 +1 0 –1 –2
20. Good writing 4. Writers need to 15. Voice in writing 7. Good writing 9. Good writing
contains details, be able to use has to be stays focused. has a strong
elaboration, appropriate verb appropriate to introduction,
support, whether tenses and other the purpose for 19. It all depends stating the topic,
narrative or proper grammar. writing. on the type of and a strong
expository. writing. conclusion,
18. A good writer 1. A good paper summing up or
24. You need to have surprises the has a strong, 6. A lot of juicy reiterating the
a point! reader. logical overall verbs help make important points.
organization. writing good.
17. Writing needs to 2. I like when a
be free of errors writer adds 30. It’s good when the
in conventions or something to writer is obviously
mechanics. their writing knowledgeable
which shows about the subject.
some personality.
5. Good writing
shows a sense of
audience.
writer surprises the reader with unexpected moves” Table 4
and “I...like when a writer adds something to their Statements Generating the Most Disagreement
writing which shows some personality (humor, wit, Among Participants
ideals, values).” This group most strongly disagreed
1. A good paper has a strong, logical overall
with the statement ranked at the top by group 2: organization so the reader knows what to expect.
“Good writing has a strong introduction, stating the 4. Writers need to be able to use appropriate verb
topic, and a strong conclusion, summing up or reiter- tenses and other proper grammar.
ating the important points.” 9. Good writing has a strong introduction, stating
In their explanations for their rankings, members the topic, and a strong conclusion, summing up or
of group 3, like group 2, discussed the importance reiterating the important points.
of clarity in writing. However, group 3 didn’t view or- 18. A good writer surprises the reader with unexpected
moves.
ganization as the necessary path to clarity, nor did
16. Writing that is too structured (like a five-paragraph
group 3 think surprise was a threat to it. Group 3 also essay) tends to be boring.
stressed the importance of details, which group 2 17. Writing needs to be free of errors in conventions or
worried might degenerate into a loss of focus (and mechanics.
“babbling”). Like group 1, group 3 valued voice in 21. Writing needs to have complete sentences to be
writing. However, unlike group 1, group 3 felt correct considered good.
conventions were an essential ingredient for good 27. Good writing shows instead of tells.
writing. Note. Statements are abbreviated.
Group 3 included two professional writers (both
creative), two teachers in high-needs schools, and
five preservice teachers. Participants’ attitudes to-
ward their own writing or teaching writing (i.e., the
degree to which they enjoyed these activities) did
Table 5
not predict their loading on this or any of the other Statements With Which All Participants Disagreed
factors.
8. Good writing is concise, using an economy of words.
11. Good writers avoid clichés.
Most Controversial and Least 12. Writers shouldn’t try to write about too big of a
Controversial Statements topic.
14. Adjectives tend to clutter up a text.
The statements that generated the most disagree-
15. Some kids’ writing is too chatty for formal reports
ment among our participants (see Table 4) centered
and research papers—voice in writing has to be
on the need for predictable organization, the value appropriate to the purpose for writing.
of surprise, and the necessity of correct conventions. 25. You don’t see a lot of adverbs in good writing—
It’s important to remember that each group included adverbs are a sign the verbs are weak.
successful, publishing authors—so, it would be dif- 26. Good writing must conform to a genre.
ficult to argue that one perspective is right and the
Note. Statements are abbreviated.
others wrong. One perspective does not necessarily
represent greater efficacy in writing. Thus, teachers
who de-emphasize conventions and reward creativ-
ity are not wrong, per se, nor are the teachers who
advocate careful organization in writing, such as the
five-paragraph essay. Within each perspective, how- Equally interesting are the items that virtually
ever, teachers do need to consider the purpose for a all our participants disagreed with (see Table 5).
particular piece of writing. For example, a creative Everyone in our study disagreed with the warning
personal narrative about a new stepmother does not against too many adjectives and adverbs. The opin-
need to adhere to the five-paragraph structure, nor ion that a good prose style requires an economic
should an essay written for a standardized test get use of words is perhaps not as universal or eternal as
“creative” with punctuation. some writing educators tend to believe.

Implications for the Classroom manner. As educators, we talk about the importance
of valuing diversity—in ethnicity, culture, and learn-
Our results should not be taken to mean that these
ing styles—yet we seem increasingly intolerant of
three perspectives on good writing are the only
diversity in professional viewpoints and judgment,
ones that exist. Rather, these findings spotlight the
instead insisting we all be on that same page.
existence of different, authentic perspectives, which
Of course, students do get frustrated by having to
has important implications for how we assess and re-
figure out what different teachers want from student
spond to children’s writing.
writing. Some teachers deduct points if a paper is
For example, even when we use well-crafted
one line over a prescribed page limit, whereas others
rubrics, the effects of differing authentic perspec-
tell students a paper should be “as long as it needs
tives are visible. In one 6 + 1 Traits rubric for orga-
to be.” Some teachers forbid sentence fragments in
nization, a criterion for achieving the highest score
any genre of writing, while others accept fragments
is an “enlightening, satisfying conclusion” (Spandel, in informal writing. The solution to this frustration,
2008, p. 286). The teacher whose viewpoint is simi- however, is not to make all teachers agree to respond
lar to perspective 1 would probably be very satisfied in the same way, but to teach students that different
with a surprise ending that challenges readers’ ex- people are going to respond differently to a piece of
pectations. However, a teacher closer to the second writing. That’s why it’s so important to understand
viewpoint would not be. This second teacher would your audience and purpose for writing.
instead be satisfied with a carefully planned, easily In Writing Essentials, Regie Routman (2005) de-
anticipated conclusion, which the first teacher would tailed “Five Things I Do to Ensure Students Become
likely find dull. Excellent Writers” and led with “Demonstrate I am a
Writing rubrics also commonly stipulate a “suffi- writer who always writes with a reader in mind (some-
cient” amount of detail, examples, or support in stu- times that reader is myself)” (p. 8). When students
dent papers. But teachers more inclined toward the begin with a new teacher, they need to know their
third perspective identified in our study may want far audience literally—that is, they need to be able to ask
more detail than teachers inclined toward the second specific questions about the teacher’s expectations
view, which considers too much detail a harbinger of of their writing, even when they are given rubrics.
loss of focus. How much detail is the right amount? It By openly discussing the different views of different
depends partly on who is reading the paper. teachers, we reinforce the need to consider audi-
In addition, all writing rubrics include a sec- ence and purpose before writing. Of course, teach-
tion on correct conventions. Teachers leaning more ers must make their expectations clear in advance
toward perspective 3 would be very alert to errors of writing and acknowledge, without disparaging,
in conventions and would be sure to tally them up that other teachers’ expectations are different. If we
carefully. To these teachers, the presence of errors openly accept the role of subjectivity in assessment
in conventions—even when they don’t interfere with and response to writing, our students also will learn
comprehension—would signal writing that is not to do so.
good. Teachers more inclined toward perspective 1 Emphasizing audience and purpose in writing in-
would be less focused on such errors, perhaps even struction does not undermine students’ performance
considering such a focus to be too picky, and record on standardized writing tests. In fact, it can improve
a better score on conventions than their colleagues students’ test performance, because the purpose and
inclined toward perspective 3. Teachers with a view audience for this type of writing are so clearly under-
similar to perspective 1 may, in fact, be delighted stood: The purpose is for students to achieve a high
when students challenge the rules of conventions in score on this test, so they will have more opportuni-
their writing—after all, e.e. cummings did! ties for themselves in the future. The audience is a
It’s easy to think that our own perspective is right, group of evaluators using a specified rubric, which
or at least more valid than others’. But understand- provides some guidance as to what will be valued in
ing and respecting other viewpoints may, in the long students’ essays.
run, be a far more valuable way to help children be- Making it clear to students that test writing is its
come writers than attempting to train entire faculties own genre of writing, with a unique purpose and au-
to respond to and assess student writing in a uniform dience, is far more beneficial to students’ growth as
writers than giving the impression that all writing is References
like test writing. To do well in the world outside of Arter, J., Spandel, V., Culham, R., & Pollard, J. (1994). The impact
of training students to be self-assessors of writing. Paper pre-
school, students need to learn to write in many dif-
sented at the annual meeting of the American Educational
ferent genres, for different audiences and purposes. Research Association, New Orleans.
Given the existence of different, authentic views Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle: New understandings about writ-
of what constitutes good writing, teachers should feel ing, reading, and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Atwell, N. (2002). Lessons that change writers. Portsmouth, NH:
free to question and critique expert views of what Heinemann.
makes writing good. Many of the common assump- Borthwick, A.C., Stirling, T., Nauman, A.D., & Cook, D.L. (2003).
tions about good style today, especially limiting the Achieving successful school-university collaboration. Urban
Education, 38(3), 330–371. doi:10.1177/0042085903038003003
use of adjectives and adverbs, may not make sense
Brown, S.R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant
for writing instruction at the elementary level, espe- Subjectivity, 16(3/4), 91–138.
cially for English learners and students who don’t Burke, J. (2003). Writing reminders: Tools, tips, and techniques.
speak standard English at home. Allowing students Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Calkins, L. (1994). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH:
the freedom to use and play with as many words as Heinemann.
possible is probably far more beneficial overall than Calkins, L. (Ed.). (2008a). Units of study for primary writing: A
making students conform to a particular writing style yearlong curriculum (K–2). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Calkins, L. (Ed.). (2008b). Units of study for teaching writing,
for a test. Teachers have both a right and a respon-
grades 3–5. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
sibility to determine and discuss their own views of Culham, R. (2003). 6 + 1 traits of writing: The complete guide
what makes writing good. grades 3 and up. New York: Scholastic Professional Books.
Ta ke AC TION!
Remind your students that when don’t need to get frustrated or taking about five minutes to write
the whole class reads the same upset by this—they just need to individual responses to the question
book, story, or article, everyone make sure they’re clear about “What do you think makes writing
responds a little differently. Some a teacher’s expectations. good?” Then, as a whole group,
students like the story, while others The next time you and your discuss differing views and show
don’t. Some students think the class respond to a student’s respect for others’ viewpoints—
article is interesting, while others paper, be sure everyone owns the teacher who stresses correct
don’t. Explain that differences like his or her opinion. For instance, conventions over creativity is not
these also occur when teachers if you’re confused by the ending wrong, nor is the teacher who
and peers read students’ papers. of a student’s paper, rather than values creativity over conventions.
Just as people like different saying, “The end is confusing,” say, Given that subjectivity is
kinds of food, they also like “I was confused by the ending,” inevitable, discuss how to reduce
different aspects of writing. That’s and ask the class, “Was anyone students’ frustration with teachers’
why it’s important for writers to else confused by the end?” This differences in assessment. Create
have a clear understanding of opens a rich discussion in which your own rubrics that reflect your
who they are writing for and why everyone thinks about his or her views of what makes writing good.
they are writing. Explain that, response to the text. It also directs Finally, do your own writing.
because different teachers value students back to the text, to see When you grow as a writer yourself,
different things in students’ writing, if making changes will help. your understanding of your
students have to understand Professional development students’ struggles and questions
what their teachers are looking sessions can provide an opportunity increases. When you experience
for. For example, some teachers for you and your colleagues to feedback on your own writing from
prefer that students organize discuss your own views of what peers, you will better understand
their papers in a particular way— makes writing good. Talk to the importance of being
into five paragraphs—whereas your school literacy coach or encouraging and open-minded
other teachers prefer students administrators about devoting a when responding to students’
do not. Let students know they PD session to this topic. Start by work.

Culham, R. (2008). 6 + 1 traits of writing: The complete guide for .edu. Stirling is Associate Dean of the College of
the primary grades. New York: Scholastic Professional Books.
Education at Northeastern Illinois University; e-mail
Cunningham, P.M., & Cunningham, J.W. (2010). What really mat-
ters in writing: Research-based practices across the curriculum. [email protected]. Borthwick is Associate Dean of
Boston: Allyn & Bacon. the College of Education at National Louis University,
Diederich, P.B., French, J.W., & Carlton, S.T. (1961). Factors in judg- Chicago, Illinois; e-mail [email protected].
ments of writing quality (Research Bulletin 61-15). Princeton,
NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Education Northwest. (n.d.). About 6 + 1 trait® writing. Portland,
OR: Author. Retrieved Januar y 6, 2010, from education
northwest.org/resource/949 More to E xplore
Elledge, S. (1984). E.B. White: A biography. New York: Norton.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (2009). The discovery of grounded IRA Books
theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: ■■ Marvelous Minilessons for Teaching Beginning
Aldine Transaction. Writing, K–3 by Lori Jamison Rog
Kerlinger, F.N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ■■ Marvelous Minilessons for Teaching
ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Intermediate Writing, Grades 4–6 by Lori
Rosenblatt, L.M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The trans- Jamison Rog
actional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern ■■ Standards for the Assessment of Reading and
Illinois University Press.
Writing, a joint publication of the International
Routman, R. (2005). Writing essentials: Raising expectations
and results while simplif ying teaching. Portsmouth, NH: Reading Association and the National Council
Heinemann. of Teachers of English
Spandel, V. (2008). Creating young writers: Using the six traits ■■ Using Rubrics to Improve Student Writing, a
to enrich writing process in primary classrooms (2nd ed.). six-title series of books spanning kindergarten
Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon. to grade 5, by Sally Hampton, Sandra Murphy,
Spandel, V. (2009a). Creating 6-trait revisers and editors for and Margaret Lowry
grade 2: 30 revision and editing lessons. Boston: Pearson.
Spandel, V. (2009b). Creating writers through 6-trait writing as- IRA Journal Articles
sessment and instruction (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. ■■ An Effective Framework for Primary-Grade
“
Strunk, W., & White, E.B. (2000). The elements of style (4th ed.). Guided Writing Instruction” by Sharan A.
New York: Allyn & Bacon.
Gibson, The Reading Teacher, December 2008
Tracey, D.H., & Morrow, L.M. (2006). Lenses on reading: An intro- ■■ “We Learn What We Do: Developing a
duction to theories and models. New York: Guilford.
Repertoire of Writing Practices in an Instant
Messaging World” by Gloria E. Jacobs,
Nauman teaches in the Department of Reading, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,
College of Education, at Northeastern Illinois November 2008
University, Chicago, USA; e-mail A-Nauman@neiu

The Reading Teacher - 2011 - Nauman - What Makes Writing Good An Essential Question For Teachers

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Reading Teacher - 2011 - Nauman - What Makes Writing Good An Essential Question For Teachers

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Reading Teacher - 2011 - Nauman - What Makes Writing Good An Essential Question For Teachers

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

19362714, 2011, 5, Downloaded from https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1598/RT.64.5.2 by The Chinese University Of Hong Kong, Wiley Online Library on [02/12/2022].

Most adjectives are...sprinkled into sentences by writ-

What Makes Writing Good? An Essential Question for Teachers 319

What Makes Writing Good? An Essential Question for Teachers 321

What Makes Writing Good? An Essential Question for Teachers 323

What Makes Writing Good? An Essential Question for Teachers 325

What Makes Writing Good? An Essential Question for Teachers 327

You might also like