Module 3
Module 3
Indicative Content
Program Outcomes and Learning Outcomes
Lesson 1 Program Outcomes and Student Learning Outcomes
Lesson 2 Program Outcomes for Teacher Education
Module 3 Lesson 3 Three types of Learning Outcomes
Lesson 4 Domain I: Cognitive (Knowledge)
Lesson 5 Domain II: Psychomotor (Skills)
Lesson 6 Domain III: Affective (Attitude)
Lesson 7 Kendall’s and Marzano’s New Taxonomy
LEARNING OUTCOMES
1. State the program outcomes expected of all educational institutions and educational institutions
according to type
2. Discuss the programs outcomes of teacher education
3. Distinguish learning outcomes in the 3 domains of learning and in the additional levels of
knowledge processing of Kendall and Marzano
4. Formulate learning outcomes in the cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains in the
different levels and in the metacognitive and self-system knowledge processing of Kendall &
Marzano
INTRODUCTION
In this Module, you will distinguish program outcomes from learning outcomes. Learning
outcomes come in three (3) different domains –cognitive, psychomotor, and affective. You will also be
introduced to Kendall’s and Marzano’s five levels of processing information, mental procedures and
psychomotor procedures.
The shift of focus in education from content to student learning outcomes has changed teachers
instructional perspective. In the past, teachers were often heard about their concern to finish their subject
matter before the end of the term. Maybe because of the number of their students or failure to clarify the
desired learning outcomes, teacher’s concern for outcomes was secondary to the completion of the planned
content for the subject. In other words, teachers were more content-centered than outcomes-centered.
The new educational perspective requires teachers to visualize the ideal graduates three or more
years after graduation and right after completion of the program, i.e., graduation time (as stated in
institutional outcomes and program outcomes. The Commission on Higher Education, the body that
regulates higher education in Philippines in its Memorandum order #20, s. 2014 requires the following
program outcomes for all higher education institutions.
The ability to:
a) articulate and discuss the latest developments in the specific field of practice 66.
b) effectively communicate orally and in writing using English and Filipino.
c) work effectively and independently in multi-disciplinary multi-cultural teams 67,
d) act in recognition of professional, social, and ethical responsibility.
e) preserve and promote “Filipino historical and cultural heritage” 68.
Some program outcomes are based on HEI type because determines the focus and purpose of the
HEI. For example:
1|Page
gemmafagustin
AY 2022-2023
ED 106: Assessment in Learning 1
public discourses particularly in response to the needs of the communities one serves.
Graduates of universities participate in the generation of new knowledge or in research and
development projects.
Graduates of State Universities and Colleges must. In addition, have the competencies to support
“national, regional and local development plans”
The program outcomes specific to degrees are program spelled out in the specific Policies,
Standards and Guidelines (PSGSs) per program or degree issued by the same Commission. The following
are the program outcomes for the Teacher Education.
These three domains of learning are given in detail in the succeeding pages.
geometric figures.
Apply, change, compute, Use a mathematical formula
1.3 Applying: Using what construct, demonstrate, to solve an algebra
was learned in the classroom discover, modify, prepare, problem;
into similar new situation produce, show, solve, use Prepare daily menus for one
week for a family of six.
Analyse, compare, contrast, Observe a classroom and list
1.4 Analyzing: Separating diagram, differentiate, down the things to be
materials or concept into distinguish, illustrate, outline, improved;
component parts to select Differentiate the parts of a
understand the whole. Tree.
Compare, conclude, criticize, Defend a research proposal;
1.5 Evaluating: Judging the critique, defend, evaluate, Select the most effective
value of an idea, object or relate, support, justify solution;
material Critique a class
demonstration
1.6 Creating: Building a Categorize, combine, compile, Compile personal records
structure or pattern; putting compose, devise, design, plan, and documents into a
parts together organize, revise, rearrange, portfolio;
generate, modify Write a syllabus for a school
subject
In the early seventies, F. Simpson, Dave and A.S Harrow recommended categories for the
psychomotor Domain which included physical coordination, movement and use of the motor skills, body
parts. Development of these skills requires constant practice in accuracy and speed. Simpson contributed 7
categories, Dave 5 categories and Harrow 6 categories.
Dave, 1975
5|Page
gemmafagustin
AY 2022-2023
ED 106: Assessment in Learning 1
Harrow, 1972
1.1 Reflex Movements – Reactions that are not React, Instinctive response
learned, such as involuntary reactions. Respond
1.2 Fundamental movements – Basic Grasp an
movements such as walking, or grasping. object, throw a Perform a simple task
ball, walk
1.3 Perceptual Abilities – Response to stimuli such as Catch a ball, Tract a moving object
visual, auditory, kinesthetic, or tactile draw or write Recognize a pattern
discrimination
1.4 Physical abilities (Fitness) –stamina that must be Agility, Gain strength
developed for further development such as endurance, Run a marathon
strength and agility. strength
1.5 Skilled movements – advanced learned Adapts, Using an advanced series of
movements as one would find in sports or acting. constructs, integrated movements.
creates, Perform a role in a stage
modifies play or play in a set of series
in a sports game.
1.6 Non-discursive communication – use affective Arrange, Express one’s self by using
body language such as gestures and facial compose, movements and gestures.
expressions. interpretation
6|Page
gemmafagustin
Char
acte-
ion
Internalizing
AY 2022-2023
ED 106: Assessment in Learning 1
Valuing
These contributions from Simpson, Dave and Harrow have been re-organized and simplified into
four categories or levels.
2.2 Imitating: attempt to Begin, explain, move, Show understanding and do sequence
copy a physical behaviour. display, proceed, react, of steps with assistance, recognize
show, state, volunteer one’s limitations
Receiving
2.3 Practising: performing a Bend, calibrate, Operate quickly and accurately,
specific activity repeatedly construct, differentiate, display competence while
dismantle, display, performing, performance is moving
fasten, fix, grasp, grind, towards becoming automatic, and
handle, measure, mix, smooth.
operate, manipulate,
mend
2.4 Adapting fine tuning the Organize, relax, shorten, Perform automatically, construct a
skill and making minor sketch, write, rearrange, new scheme/sequence, apply skill in
adjustments to attain compose, create, design, new situation, create a new routine,
perfection originate develop a new program.
3.5 Internalizing: practicing Act, display, influence, Show self-reliance when asking;
value system that control’s listen, discriminate, cooperate in group activities;
one’s behaviour, exhibiting modify, perform, revise, demonstrate objectivity in problem
behavior that is consisted, resolve, verify – solving; revise judgement in light
pervasive, predictable and of new evidences, value people for
characteristics of a person. what they are and not for how they
look
(Source: D.R Krathwohl, B.S. Bloom, B.B, Masia (1964) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook II
Affective Domain, (The Classification of educational Goals; 1956) as cited by Navarro, et.al 2017. Assessment of
Learning 1 3rd Edition)
Kendall and Marzano instead of categorizing learning activities which Bloom and Anderson did,
reframed the three domains of knowledge (information, metal procedures and psychomotor procedures) by
describing six levels of processing knowledge. (Refer to Figure 5). The first four levels of processing are
cognitive, beginning with the lowest (retrieval) then moving upward with increasing cognitive complexity
—comprehension, analysis, and knowledge utilization. The fifth level of processing, the metacognitive
system, involves the learner’s specification of learning goals, monitoring of the leaner’s own learning
process, clarity and accuracy of the learner’s learning. (See figure 5)
The highest level of knowledge processing self-system, involves the learner’s examination of the
importance of the learning task and his/her self-efficacy. It also involves the learner’s examining his/her
emotional response and his/her motivation of learning.
8|Page
gemmafagustin
AY 2022-2023
ED 106: Assessment in Learning 1
(Source: Marzano, R.J. and J.S. Kendall. The nEw Taxonomy of Education Objectives, 2 nd ed.)
9|Page
gemmafagustin
AY 2022-2023
ED 106: Assessment in Learning 1
Source: https://www.greatschoolspartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/
x3B_Marzano_New_Taxonomy_Chart_with_verbs_3.16.121.pdf
3.8 Exercises
A. The following are examples of learning outcomes, on the second column, write the domain in which
each outcome is classified and on the third column the level/category to which the learning outcome
learning.
Domain Level/category*
1.Formulating a procedure to follow
in preparing for class demonstration.
2. Formulate new program
3.Perform repeatedly with speed and
accuracy.
4. Listen to others with respect.
5. Select the most effective among a
number of solutions.
6. Watch a more experienced
performer.
7. Know the rules and practice them.
8. Show ability to resolve
problems/conflicts
9. Apply learning principles in
studying pupil behaviour
10. Recite prices of commodities
from memory.
B. Using the indicated topic or subject matter, write the learning outcomes for each of
the 3 domains arranged from the simplest to the most complex level or category.
10 | P a g e
gemmafagustin
AY 2022-2023
ED 106: Assessment in Learning 1
2.3 Practicing
1.4 Adapting
11 | P a g e
gemmafagustin