0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views3 pages

Angmomcommutationproof

The document provides a proof that the quantum angular momentum operators Lx, Ly, and Lz do not commute. It shows through expanding the operators and combining terms that [Lx, Ly] = iħLz, demonstrating the non-commutativity of the operators and proving they cannot be known simultaneously due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

Uploaded by

Gamma Facts
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views3 pages

Angmomcommutationproof

The document provides a proof that the quantum angular momentum operators Lx, Ly, and Lz do not commute. It shows through expanding the operators and combining terms that [Lx, Ly] = iħLz, demonstrating the non-commutativity of the operators and proving they cannot be known simultaneously due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

Uploaded by

Gamma Facts
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Quantum Mechanics: Commutation Relation

Proofs

16th April 2008

I. Proof for Non-Commutativity of Indivdual Quantum Angular


Momentum Operators
In this section, we will show that the operators L̂x , L̂y , L̂z do not commute
with one another, and hence cannot be known simultaneously. The relations
are (reiterating from previous lectures):
 
∂ ∂
L̂x = −ih̄ y −z
∂z ∂y

 
∂ ∂
L̂y = −ih̄ z −x
∂x ∂z

 
∂ ∂
L̂z = −ih̄ x −y
∂y ∂x
We would like to proove the following commutation relations:

[L̂x , L̂y ] = i h̄ L̂z ,

[L̂y , L̂z ] = i h̄ L̂x ,

[L̂z , L̂x ] = i h̄ L̂y .

We will use the first relation for our proof; the second and third follow analo-
gously. Let’s also consider a function, f (x, y, z) that we will have the opera-
tors act upon in our discussion. The expanded version of [ L̂x , L̂y ] = i h̄ L̂z is:

     
[L̂x , L̂y ] = L̂x L̂y − L̂y L̂x

1
     
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
= y −z z −x − z −x y −z
∂z ∂y ∂x ∂z ∂x ∂z ∂z ∂y
Now let’s expand the operators (ignore the underbraces and numbers for
now):

  
   ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
L̂x L̂y = y −z z −x
∂z ∂y ∂x ∂z
       
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
=y z −y x −z z +z x
∂z ∂x ∂z ∂z ∂y ∂x ∂y ∂z
       
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
=y +z −y x −z z +z x
∂x ∂z ∂x ∂z ∂z ∂y ∂x ∂y ∂z
| {z } | {z } | {z } | {z }
1 2 3 4
  
Likewise for the L̂y L̂x term:

  
   ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
L̂y L̂x = z −x y −z
∂x ∂z ∂z ∂y
       
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
=z y −z z −x y +x z
∂x ∂z ∂x ∂y ∂z ∂z ∂z ∂y
       
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
=z y −z z −x y +x +z
∂x ∂z ∂x ∂y ∂z ∂z ∂y ∂z ∂y
| {z } | {z } | {z } | {z }
5 6 7 8

Combining terms and noting that [x̂, ŷ] = 0 and [p̂ x , p̂y ] = 0. We will com-
bine terms as follows: (1-8), (2-7), (3-6), and (4-5).

   
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
(1 − 8) = y +z −x +z
∂x ∂z ∂x ∂y ∂z ∂y
   
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
= y −x + yz − xz
∂x ∂y ∂z ∂x ∂z ∂y
   
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
= y −x + zy − zx (recall the commutation relations noted!
∂x ∂y ∂x ∂z ∂y ∂z
   
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
= y −x +z y −x
∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y ∂z
| {z }
9

2
∂2 ∂2
(2 − 7) = xy − yx
∂z 2 ∂z 2
∂2
= (xy − yx) 2
∂z
∂2
= [x, y] 2
∂z
∂2
= (0) 2 = 0
∂z

∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
(3 − 6) = z 2 − z2
∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x
 
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
= z2 −
∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x
2
= z (p̂x p̂y − p̂y p̂x )
= z 2 [p̂x , p̂y ] = 0 (p̂x and p̂y commute!)

∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
(4 − 5) = zx − zy
∂y ∂z ∂x ∂z
 
∂ ∂ ∂
= z x −y
∂y ∂x ∂z
| {z }
10

If we add the expressions 9 and 10, inserting a factor of −ih̄ for each partial
derivative that represents a momentum operator, we obtain:

 
∂ ∂
[L̂x , L̂y ] = −h̄2 y −x
∂x ∂y
 
∂ ∂
= h̄2 x −y
∂y ∂x
But,

 
∂ ∂
L̂z = −ih̄ x −y
∂y ∂x
Thus,

[L̂x , L̂y ] = i h̄ L̂z

You might also like