Group 7 - ELE-HBO
Group 7 - ELE-HBO
Group 7 - ELE-HBO
CASE ANALYSIS
Consolidated Products
Submitted by:
TICONG, Jirl
TOLENTINO, Chiara
UY, Alexander
P-ELE-HBO
Submitted to:
composed of plant workers not belonging to or recognizing a labor union. The case presented the
company's former plant manager for ten years, Ben Samuels. Ben had close relations with the production
workers due to his democratic, participative, and inspirational leadership (Consolidated Products
Managers’ Leadership Styles - 1731 Words | Case Study Example, 2021). Employees liked his leadership
style because Ben understood the workers' needs and the value they bring to the organization. Ben
imposed multiple human relations activities during his time, aiming to help the workers with personal and
professional development. He believed that properly treating his subordinates would result in higher
efficiency and productivity at work, more positive professional and personal growth, and a greater sense
of loyalty to the company. Ben also believed that treating the employees right would improve their
performance even without close supervision from higher officials. He applied the same principles in
managing his supervisors. However, with this management style, Ben did not set objectives and standards
for the whole plant and the different departments within to follow. He never asked his supervisors to
prepare and develop plans and programs for improving plant productivity and product quality. As a result,
during Ben's time as a plant manager, the plant had the lowest employee turnover among Consolidated
Products' five plants. On the downside, the plant recorded the second-worst cost and production levels.
For these reasons, the company asked Ben to take early retirement after being acquired by another firm.
This time, the case introduced Phil Jones as the replacement of Ben for the plant manager
position. Phil's beliefs differ entirely from Ben's. Consistent with his well-known reputation, he
immediately initiated changes inside the plant by implementing cost-cutting methods, introducing a
computer monitoring system, setting demanding objectives, and checking employee performance. Unlike
Ben's employee-friendly management style, Phil employed autocratic and goal-oriented leadership
(Forsyth, 2018). Phil believed that employees should work hard to sustain their jobs or that others who are
more efficient and deserving may take their position quickly. He primarily implemented the cost-cutting
methods because he deemed these costs (e.g., training programs for supervisors and equipment
maintenance) excessive and merely a waste of time. Aside from these methods, Phil also instructed his
supervisors to establish high-performance regulations and standards for each department. Although the
whole plant structure had more direction, Phil demanded more consistent performance from his
subordinates while subjecting them to a stricter and less relational working environment. As a result, after
his first year as a plant manager, the plant's performance increased positively due to lower costs and
higher outputs. However, workers were not happy with the leadership style of their new plant manager.
Some employees left their jobs, others were fired due to incompetence, and a couple of them started talks
about unionizing. These circumstances resulted in higher employee turnover, leading to more significant
Under Ben Samuels’ management, employee satisfaction was considered more important than
effective and efficient operations. Although this type of management produced the lowest employee
turnover among the company’s five plants, it is also responsible for the plant obtaining the second-worst
record for costs and production levels. On the other hand, when Phil Jones was brought into the company
as a replacement, he did the complete opposite and displayed a blatant disregard for the company’s
employees. As a result, supervisors and machine operators started to quit, and talk of unionizing started
among the workers. Phil also exhibited signs of micromanaging, which could be a lack of freedom and
trust within the workplace. However, he was successful with cost-cutting and increased production output.
For the company to be successful, a balance between employee satisfaction and the efficiency of
operations must be present. Without these two, there is little hope for the company to grow. Thus, they
must devise a plan to support these factors without sacrificing too much of each.
III. Alternative Courses of Action (ACA)
Model).
According to the Deloitte Model, autonomy is one of the four essential components
employees need to find meaning in their job. Employees tend to thrive when given independence
and control over their work, giving them a sense of ownership. In the case of Phil, he requires
supervisors to check with him first before taking any significant actions, thus controlling
whatever actions they will make, which does not give them freedom over their work. As a result,
supervisors left to take other jobs, and turnover has increased. The advantages of autonomy
include an engaged workforce, a higher employee retention rate, employee engagement, and a
and emotional. Physical engagement refers to the physical and mental energy exerted. Cognitive
engagement is when employees know and deliver their employer’s vision and strategies.
management styles (Sinclair, 2020). In order to achieve these dimensions, executives at the top
must make an effort to communicate directly with their subordinates. The goal is to make
employees, as individual contributors to the organization, feel that their accomplishments are
noticed and appreciated. In addition, these conversations offer a unique opportunity for them to
share their perspectives regarding their work and the challenges they encounter. These encounters
will make employees feel they genuinely matter to the organization, increasing their work
physiological, safety, love and belonging, esteem, and self-actualization. According to this theory,
environment such that imposing fear and control, disrespect, and stress about meeting strict goals
and deadlines will not motivate them to work harder. In addition, emotional support and safety in
the workplace are other aspects of safety. Worrying about job loss due to budget cuts will not lead
to a step up to a higher level in the hierarchy. Advantages of providing safety include strong
company culture, increased productivity, and encouragement for employees to perform to their
highest ability.
IV. Recommendation
People and relationships make an organization. Essentially, they provide an organization with a
unique identity and rich culture. When people change, then so does the organization. As a result, with
globalization and diversity, various organizations have been created with their own unique set of
perceptions, attitudes, and values. However, all organizations have the same purpose: accomplishing
shared objectives through interpersonal and organizational relationships. In this case, a balance between
worker satisfaction and operational effectiveness is necessary for the business to succeed.
After a thorough analysis, the second alternative course of action is selected: enhancing visibility
(Kahn’s Model of Employee Engagement). Using William Khan’s employee engagement model, the three
dimensions of employee engagement must be satisfied. Therefore, the supervisors must try to speak with
the employees personally. The objective is to help employees feel valued and recognized for their
contributions as individuals inside the company. Additionally, they have a rare chance to share their
thoughts on their profession and the difficulties they face during these interactions. Lastly, this will foster
workplace relationships, a major source of employee motivation essential to promoting and maintaining
productivity. At the end of the day, the organization can enjoy the best of both worlds, balancing
Becoming irresistible: A new model for employee engagement. (n.d.). Deloitte Insights.
https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/deloitte-review/issue-16/employee-engagement-strategi
es.html
Carucci, R. (November 1, 2019). Balancing the Company’s Needs and Employee Satisfaction. Harvard
Business Review.
https://hbr.org/2019/11/balancing-the-companys-needs-and-employee-satisfaction
Consolidated Products Managers’ Leadership Styles - 1731 Words | Case Study Example . (2021). Free
Essays. https://ivypanda.com/essays/consolidated-products-managers-leadership-styles/
Forsyth, D. R. (2018). Group dynamics (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/management_principles/management_principles_importance_org
anizing.htm#
Marketing Team. (2022). 4 Psychological Theories To Increase Team Productivity. SaaS BPM.
https://saasbpm.com/psychological-theories-team-productivity/
Talkfreely. https://www.talkfreely.com/blog/dimensions-of-employee-engagement
The Importance of Human Relations in the Workplace. (2019). Small Business - Chron.com.
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/importance-human-relations-workplace-23061.html