MMP - 7 - CEI - Coursework Brief - 1 - 2022 - 23
MMP - 7 - CEI - Coursework Brief - 1 - 2022 - 23
MMP - 7 - CEI - Coursework Brief - 1 - 2022 - 23
Module Co-ordinator/
Dr Wael Saghir Word count 1,500
Tutor:
Submission Instructions:
Intellectual Skills
• Be able to develop appropriate research strategies and effectively apply research techniques for
consultancy interventions
Practical Skills
Page 1 of 2
The brief for this assessment is as follows:
You are expected to write a 1,500-word Business Evaluation Report where you are encouraged to choose an
enterprise and evaluate its areas of strengths and weaknesses. You are encouraged to briefly describe 3 main
areas where your chosen enterprise is preforming well and 3 areas where they can improve. You are then
expected to focus on one weakness, explain why this weakness exists and suggest a viable solution as to how
your chosen enterprise can improve in line with their key strengths.
You are expected to conduct in-depth research into your chosen enterprise and its main competitors and to
justify your recommendations for improvement using primary and secondary data and proper market analysis.
N.B. The word count may be 10% more, but not less, than 1,500.
Assessment Criteria:
Each task is being marked according to the following rubric:
A very well constructed report with logical and comprehensive content. The report
demonstrates a high standard of analysis and research. A very good
70% and
understanding of the key concepts and implications of relevant conceptual
over
frameworks. Overall style is excellent in terms of presentation and referencing.
Overall structure will be adequate to convey information but may lack some clarity
in some analysis and discussion. The report demonstrates basic understanding of
the key concepts and issues. The report demonstrates limited but sound
50 - 59% understanding of the key areas. Overall presentation will be sound in terms of
expression, referencing, and word limits, but may have some weaknesses in
these areas.
The report may cover key areas but lack a logical or coherent structure or have a
sound structure but content lacking substance for a higher grade. There will be
40 – 49% little evidence to demonstrate sufficient understanding of key concepts and
issues. Key information may be presented but not explained.
The report lacks in both coherent structure and substantive content. There will be
little or no evidence of current or relevant research. There is very limited evidence
of an understanding of key concepts. There may be significant and consistent
39% and
weaknesses in presentation style in terms of referencing, expression, layout, and
less
word limits.
Page 2 of 2