Dungan, Andrew, Hist 11 - Module 1 PDF
Dungan, Andrew, Hist 11 - Module 1 PDF
Dungan, Andrew, Hist 11 - Module 1 PDF
MODULE 1
MEANING OF HISTORY
LEARNING OUTCOMES
INTRODUCTION
We always hear the word history everywhere. But what is the real meaning of history? Do you have
your own meaning of what is history? And have you figured out its importance to our daily life?
ANALYSIS
Before you start studying this module, take this simple test to find out how much you already
know about the topics to be discussed.
Well, how was it? Do you think you answered well? Compare your answers with the Answer
Key below.
Answer Key
B. True or false:
1. TRUE
2. TRUE
3. FALSE - Unlike the study of the Natural Science that has subjectively (OBJECTIVELY)
measurable phenomena, the study of History is an objective (SUBJECTIVE) process as
documents and relics are scattered and do not together comprise the total object that the
historian is studying.
If all of your answers are correct, very good! You may still study the module to review what
you already know. Who knows, you might learn a few more new things as well.
If you got a low score, don’t feel bad. This only means that this module is for you. It will
help you understand some important concepts that you can apply in your daily life. If you study this
module carefully, you will learn the answers to all items in the test and a lot more! Are you ready?
ABSTRACTION
On the other side, the events occurring before written record are considered prehistoric; an
umbrella term that relates to past events as well as the memory, discovery, collection, organization,
presentation and interpretation of information about these events. Hence, scholars who write about
history are called Historians.
History is a narration of the events which have happened among mankind, including an account of the
rise and fall of the nations, as well as of other great changes which have affected the political and
social condition of the human race.
- John Anderson, 1876. A Manual of General History
Aristotle is a Greek philosopher who looked upon history as the systematic accounting of a
set of natural phenomena considering the chronological arrangement of the account.
There are theories constructed by historians in investigating history which are Factual and
Speculative History.
• FACTUAL HISTORY o It presents readers the plain and basic information, the events
that took place (what), the time and date with which the event happened (when), the place
with which the event took place, and the people that were involved (who).
The practice of historical writing is called Historiography, the traditional method in doing
historical research that focus on gathering of documents from different libraries and archives to form a
pool of evidence needed in making descriptive or analytical narrative.
Salient feature of historical writing is the facility to give meaning and impact value to a group
of people about their past.
The process of critically examining and analyzing the records and survivals of the past is
called Historical Method.
From the incomplete evidence, historians strive to restore the total past of mankind. They do it
from the point of view that human beings live in different times and that their experiences maybe
somehow comparable, or that their experiences may have significantly differed contingent on the
place and time.
For the historian, history becomes only that part of the human past which can be meaningfully
reconstructed from the available records and from inferences regarding their setting.
In short, the historian’s aim is verisimilitude (the truth, authenticity, plausibility) about the
past. Unlike the study of the natural science that has objectively measurable phenomena, the study of
history is a subjective process as documents and relics are scattered and do not together comprise the
total object that the historian is studying.
Some of the natural scientist, such as geologist and paleo-zoologist who study fossils from the
traces of a perished past, greatly resemble historians in this regard, but they differ at certain points
since historians deal with human testimonies as well as physical traces.
APPLICATION
I. Using the table below, list down the differences of the Factual and Speculative
History.
II. Write any historical event in the Philippines that you know using the two theories.
A. FACTUAL HISTORY
A land force and naval artillery fire from the Manila Bay fleet met General Luna's
onslaught at La Loma with three companies of troops under his command. Heavy
casualties were sustained by the Filipinos. On February 23, the Filipinos launched a
counterattack that made some progress before collapsing when Cavite men refused to
follow General Luna's orders and insisted that they would only obey Aguinaldo. Luna was
indignant and managed to disarm the resistance soldiers, but he was forced to retreat.
General Luna resigned from his position, which Aguinaldo reluctantly accepted after
several more negative encounters with the unruly and clannish Filipino men and after
Aguinaldo had rearmed the recalcitrant Cavite troops as his own Presidential Guard.
However, Aguinaldo persuaded Luna to return and appointed him commander-in-chief
because the war continued to go very poorly for the Philippines over the next three weeks.
B. SPECULATIVE HISTORY
The Communist insurgency and Juan Ponce Enrile's ambush outside the Wack-Wack
subdivision were two specific incidents that Marcos used as justification for his decision to
impose martial law in the Philippines. Naturally, both factors are part of the current threat that
justifies the imposition of martial law. Long-term martial law has had positive effects on the
Filipino people, but still the negative effects prevail, including severe restrictions on civil
liberties, violations of human rights, a lack of press freedom, suppression of social dissent, no
real elections, social immobility, and unjustified imprisonment and killings. But this event is
still questionable because there are distinctive views from Filipinos who experienced martial
law.