Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis
Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis
January 3, 2019
3. Please note that the stimulus that is being applied can be time varying.
4. The steady state response response refers to the condition that is reached after the transient or natural response
has died out.
5. If the stimulus that is applied is sinusoidal in nature, then the response is known as sinusoidal steady state response.
2. In the above equation Vm is the amplitude of the sinusoid, ω is the angular frequency of the sinusioid and θ is the
phase of the sinusoid
3. Let us compare two sinusoids v1 (t) = Vm sin(ωt) and v(t) = Vm sin(ωt + θ). Both are time varying functions.
At t = 0, the magnitude of v1 = 0, however, the magnitude of v2 = sin(θ) is non zero and depends on the value of
θ. We can say the function v1 is lagging v2 by θ. We can also say that v2 us leading v1 by θ
4. Please remember the following identitites
3. For time varying excitations (stimulus or input), the current through the capacitor and voltage across inductor are
functions of time.
4. Any time varying periodic signals can be represented using sinusoids. Let us try to understand how the inductors
or capacitors behave for a sinusoidal input.
1
R
Vm cos(ωt) L
di
Ri + L = Vm cos(ωt) (6)
dt
7. This solution is valid for all values of t. Since cos(ωt) and sin(ωt) are non zero for all values of t, it implies that,
for all values of t
RI1 + LI2 − Vm = 0 (10)
ωLVm
I2 = (13)
(R2 + ω 2 L2 )
RVm ωLVm
i(t) = cos(ωt) + sin(ωt) (14)
(R2 2 2
+ ω L ) (R + ω 2 L2 )
2
10. This expression is tricky to evaluate and difficult to solve. Let us simplify it further.
11. Let us assume that solution i(t) is of the form
2
14. The current i(t) can be written as
Vm −1 ωL
i(t) = p cos ωt − T an (19)
(R2 + ω 2 L2 ) R
15. From the analysis above the following inferences can be drawn
• Though analysis of circuits having passive energy storage elements ( inductors and capacitors) is possible, it
is cumbersome and not straightforward.
• The analysis involves finding out solution to linear differential equations and it is the prime cause for making
the analysis cumbersome
• Specifically from eqn.19, we can infer the following
• Given a circuit having passive energy storage elements, there is a relationship between the magnitude of voltage
(Vm ) and magnitude of current (Im ).
• There is a finite phase difference between voltage (0◦ ) and current (θ = T an−1 ωL R ).
4. Let us multiply the voltage function V2 by imaginary number j. When a voltage jV2 is applied, the current is going
to be jI2 . This is due to homogenity.
5. If the system is excited by V1 + jV2 , the current is going to be I1 + jI2 .
6.
Vm ej(ωt + θ)
⇒ I = Im ej(ωt + φ)
(21)
7. Try to understand this, Instead of applying real excitation V = Vm cos(ωt + θ), let us apply the complex mathe-
matical excitation Vm ej(ωt + θ) . This complex excitation has two parts the real part (V1 = Vm cos(ωt + θ)) and
the imaginary part (V2 = jVm sin(ωt + θ)).
8. Application of such complex excitation results in a complex response Im ej(ωt + φ) . This complex response also has
two components, the real component (Im cos(ωt + φ)) and the imaginary component (jIm sin(ωt + φ))
9. Consider only the real parts of excitation and real part of response after the analysis is done. Ignore
imaginary components. They are just mathematical quantities added to simplify the analysis
3. The solution i(t) for this equation is of the form i(t) = Im ej(ωt + φ) . substituting this in the above equation, we
have
d
RIm ej(ωt + φ) + L Im ej(ωt + φ) = Vm e(jωt) (23)
dt
3
4. Removing e(jωt) from both sides we have
5. Simplify further
Vm
Im ejφ = (26)
(R + jωL)
Vm
Im = p (27)
(R2 + ω 2 L2 )
ωL
θ = T an−1 (28)
R
6. Eqn.22 is a differential equation and Eqn.25 is a linear algebraic equation !!!. This is the simplicity.
7. The solution obtained by using the complex excitation is exactly same as the solution obtained using cosine exci-
tation. The analysis has become simple
3. Similarly
Im ∠φ ≡ Im cos(ωt + φ) ≡ Re[Im e(jωt + φ)
] (30)
4. The phasor V captures both the amplitude and the phase information of voltage
V = Vm ∠θ (31)
5. The phasor I captures both the amplitude and the phase information of voltage
I = Im ∠φ (32)
6. The ratio of the voltage phasor and current phasor is known as impedance.
V
Z= (33)
I
7. Since there is an linear relationship between the voltage phasor and current phasor, all the theorems/laws that are
applicable for simple resistive circuits are valid for impedance circuits. The extra step here is to represent each and
every element in phasor notation.
8. Kindly note that since e(jωt) is removed from the analysis and the equations are no more time dependent. Instead
they are frequency dependent. Thus, phasor notation is an implicit transformation from time domain to frequency
domain.
4
3. Applying an input current Re[Im e(jωt + φ)
], we get
V = R . Re[Im e(jωt + φ)
] (36)
V = R.I (38)
4.5 Inductor
1. The time domain relationship between the voltage v(t) and the current i(t) is given by
d
v(t) = L i(t) (40)
dt
V = jωL . I (44)
6. In the impedance domain, the inductor is replaced by an impedance of the value jωL,
• Representing each and every phasor in terms of magnitude and phase ( please keep in mind that j = 1∠90◦
θ = (φ + 90◦ ) (48)
5
4.6 Capacitor
1. The time domain relationship between the voltage v(t) and the current i(t) is given by
d
i(t) = c v(t) (49)
dt
I = jωC . V (53)
−j
6. In the impedance domain, the capacitor is replaced by an impedance of the value ωC ,
• Representing each and every phasor in terms of magnitude and phase ( please keep in mind that j = 1∠90◦
φ = (θ + 90◦ ) (57)
Z = Z1 + Z2 (58)
Z = R + jωL (59)
6
5. If impedances Z1 and Z2 are in parallel then the total impedance is
Z = Z1 || Z2 (62)
Y = G + jωC (63)
8. KCL, KVL and all theorems are valid for impedances and admittances