0% found this document useful (0 votes)
101 views5 pages

Assignment 1 NG4S258 2022-23

It outlines the details of an assignment assessing students' understanding of leadership and management in engineering businesses. The assignment requires students to discuss the influence of different leadership approaches on organizational success using case studies and critiquing various leadership theories. It will be marked out of 100% and contributes 50% of the total module grade. Criteria for grading include the depth of research, theory application and critique, and presentation. Feedback will be provided on strengths and areas for future improvement.

Uploaded by

Nimesh Ishanka
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
101 views5 pages

Assignment 1 NG4S258 2022-23

It outlines the details of an assignment assessing students' understanding of leadership and management in engineering businesses. The assignment requires students to discuss the influence of different leadership approaches on organizational success using case studies and critiquing various leadership theories. It will be marked out of 100% and contributes 50% of the total module grade. Criteria for grading include the depth of research, theory application and critique, and presentation. Feedback will be provided on strengths and areas for future improvement.

Uploaded by

Nimesh Ishanka
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

PUBLIC

/
CYHOE
DDUS
Final mark awarded:_____

FACULTY OF COMPUTING,
ENGINEERING and SCIENCE

Assessment Cover Sheet and Feedback Form 2022/23

Module Code: Module Title: Module Lecturer:


NG4S258 Professional Engineering Matthew Jones
Management
Assessment Title and Tasks: Leadership and Assessment No.
management in engineering businesses 1 of 2
No. of pages submitted in total including this page: Word Count of submission
Completed by student (if applicable): Completed by student
Date Set: Submission Date: Return Date:
17/10/22 12/12/22

Part A: Record of Submission (to be completed by Student)


Extenuating Circumstances
If there are any exceptional circumstances that may have affected your ability to
undertake or submit this assignment, make sure you contact the Advice Centre on your
campus prior to your submission deadline.

Fit to sit policy:


The University operates a fit to sit policy whereby you, in submitting or presenting
yourself for an assessment, are declaring that you are fit to sit the assessment. You
cannot subsequently claim that your performance in this assessment was affected by
extenuating factors.

Plagiarism and Unfair Practice Declaration:


By submitting this assessment, you declare that it is your own work and that the sources
of information and material you have used (including the internet) have been fully
identified and properly acknowledged as required 1. Additionally, the work presented has
not been submitted for any other assessment. You also understand that the Faculty
reserves the right to investigate allegations of plagiarism or unfair practice which, if
proven, could result in a fail in this assessment and may affect your progress.

Details of Submission:
Note that all work handed in after the submission date and within 5 working days will be
capped at 40%2. No marks will be awarded if the assessment is submitted after the late
submission date unless extenuating circumstances are applied for and accepted (Advice
Centre to be consulted).
Work should be submitted as detailed in your student handbook. You are responsible for
checking the method of submission.
Student Number(s):
You are required to acknowledge that
you have read the above statements
by writing your student number (s) in
the box:
1
University Academic Integrity Regulations
2
Information on exclusions to this rule is available from Campus Advice Shops
PUBLIC
/
CYHOE
IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO KEEP A RECORD OF ALL WORK DDUS
SUBMITTED

Part B: Marking and Assessment


(to be completed by Module Lecturer)
This assignment will be marked out of 100%

This assignment contributes to 50% of the total module marks.

Assessment Task:

This assignment gives you the opportunity to explore the influence of management and
leadership on the success of business organisations.

We have explored some of the attributes of engineering professionals and seen that
organisations are made up of diverse groups of people. We have seen that organisations require
high level missions and objectives that are delivered through strategies and tactics, and that
managers need to coordinate the activities in line with what the organisation wishes to achieve.
We have seen that one model for this is the open system. These activities are against the
backdrop of a challenging macro and micro business environment.

Using case study examples from engineering organisations, discuss the influence that the
approach to management and leadership have in the success or otherwise of businesses. Is
there a particular method of leadership that is preferable, or is it dependent on the context?
Critique the various leadership theories when applied to different engineering businesses and
the environment that they operate in.

Word count: 3000 words

Remember to engage with theory and literature and critique it as you apply it and develop your
own conclusions from it.

The lecture material gives you areas to explore, and it is go beyond what has been covered in
lectures in your own research.

Remember that you need to ensure that you critique to sufficient depth. You should therefore be
mindful of not attempting to cover too many topics or theories.

Learning Outcomes to be assessed (as specified in the validated module descriptor


http://icis.glam.ac.uk):

LO1 Define and apply a wide range of appropriate, well established management techniques
and approaches applicable to technology and engineering related business.

LO2 Analyse and apply business and finance related data to facilitate effective decision making
within an organisation.

Grading Criteria:

The grade will be a combination of the following:

- Literature and case study research - 30%


- Critique of theory - 30%
- Application of theory - 30%
Presentation and referencing 10%
PUBLIC
/
CYHOE
DDUS
Performance Criteria
Level
(<40%) Insufficient evidence of relevant research undertaken.
Insufficient application of theory.
Report lacking in originality. Insufficient evidence of engagement with and
critiquing of theory and application.
(40%-49%) Limited evidence of relevant research undertaken.
Limited application of theory.
Little originality in the report with only limited evidence of basic level of
engagement with and critiquing of theory and application.
(50%-59%) Relevant referenced research, but limited discussion.
Application of theory to context being studied.
Theory and application discussed, but needing more depth of analysis.
Originality in report with some evidence of engagement with and critiquing
of theory and application.
(60%-69%) Relevant referenced research undertaken and discussed with significant
depth in the discussion.
Application of theory to context being studied.
Theory and application discussed, with evidence of depth of analysis in
some areas.
Significant evidence of originality in the report. Handling and critique of
theory and application demonstrates a depth of understanding.
(70% +) Relevant referenced research undertaken and discussed with significant
depth in the discussion to a very high standard.
Application of theory to context being studied to a level that demonstrates
a deep understanding of the subject.
Evidence of originality throughout the report. Handling and critique of
theory and application demonstrates a very strong depth of understanding.

- Total - 100%

Feedback/feed-forward (linked to assessment criteria):


 Areas where you have done well:

 Feedback from this assessment to help you to improve future assessments:

 Other comments
PUBLIC
/
CYHOE
DDUS

Mark: Marker’s Signature: Date:

Work on this module has been marked, double marked/moderated in


line with USW procedures.

Provisional mark only: subject to change and/or confirmation by the Assessment Board
PUBLIC
/
CYHOE
DDUS
Part C: Reflections on Assessment
(to be completed by student – optional)
Use of previous feedback:

In this assessment, I have taken/took note of the following points in feedback on


previous work:

Please indicate which of the following you feel/felt applies/applied to your


submitted work
 A reasonable attempt. I could have developed some of the
sections further.
 A good attempt, displaying my understanding and learning, with
analysis in some parts.
 A very good attempt. The work demonstrates my clear
understanding of the learning supported by relevant literature and scholarly
work with good analysis and evaluation.
 An excellent attempt, with clear application of literature and
scholarly work, demonstrating significant analysis and evaluation.

What I found most


difficult about this
assessment:

The areas where I


would value/would
have valued feedback:

You might also like