Euclidean geometry http://en.wikipedia.

org/wiki/Euclidean_geom etry
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search

A Greek mathematician performing a geometric construction with a compass, from The School of Athens by Raphael. Euclidean geometry is a mathematical system attributed to the Alexandrian Greek mathematician Euclid, whose Elements is the earliest known systematic discussion of geometry.[citation needed] Euclid's method consists in assuming a small set of intuitively appealing axioms, and deducing many other propositions (theorems) from these. Although many of Euclid's results had been stated by earlier mathematicians,[1] Euclid was the first to show how these propositions could fit into a comprehensive deductive and logical system.[2] The Elements begins with plane geometry, still taught in secondary school as the first axiomatic system and the first examples of formal proof. It goes on to the solid geometry of three dimensions. Much of the Elements states results of what are now called algebra and number theory, couched in geometrical language.[3] For over two thousand years, the adjective "Euclidean" was unnecessary because no other sort of geometry had been conceived. Euclid's axioms seemed so intuitively obvious that any theorem proved from them was deemed true in an absolute, often metaphysical, sense. Today, however, many other self-consistent non-Euclidean geometries are known, the first ones having been discovered in the early 19th century. An implication of Einstein's theory of general relativity is that Euclidean space is a good approximation to the properties of physical space only where the gravitational field is not too strong.[4]

Contents
[hide]
y

y y y

y y y

y y y y

1 The Elements o 1.1 Axioms o 1.2 The parallel postulate 2 Methods of proof 3 System of measurement and arithmetic 4 Notation and terminology o 4.1 Naming of points and figures o 4.2 Complementary and supplementary angles o 4.3 Modern versions of Euclid's notation 5 Some important or well known results o 5.1 The Bridge of Asses o 5.2 Congruence of triangles o 5.3 Sum of the angles of a triangle o 5.4 The Pythagorean theorem o 5.5 Thales' theorem o 5.6 Scaling of area and volume 6 Applications 7 As a description of the structure of space 8 Later work o 8.1 Archimedes and Apollonius o 8.2 The 17th century: Descartes o 8.3 The 18th century o 8.4 The 19th century and non-Euclidean geometry o 8.5 The 20th century and general relativity 9 Treatment of infinity o 9.1 Infinite objects o 9.2 Infinite processes 10 Logical basis o 10.1 Classical logic o 10.2 Modern standards of rigor o 10.3 Axiomatic formulations o 10.4 Constructive approaches and pedagogy 11 See also o 11.1 Classical theorems 12 Notes 13 References 14 External links

[edit] The Elements

Main article: Euclid's Elements The Elements are mainly a systematization of earlier knowledge of geometry. Its superiority over earlier treatments was rapidly recognized, with the result that there was little interest in preserving the earlier ones, and they are now nearly all lost. Books I-IV and VI discuss plane geometry. Many results about plane figures are proved, e.g., If a triangle has two equal angles, then the sides subtended by the angles are equal. The Pythagorean theorem is proved.[5] Books V and VII-X deal with number theory, with numbers treated geometrically via their representation as line segments with various lengths. Notions such as prime numbers and rational and irrational numbers are introduced. The infinitude of prime numbers is proved. Books XI-XIII concern solid geometry. A typical result is the 1:3 ratio between the volume of a cone and a cylinder with the same height and base.

The parallel postulate: If two lines intersect a third in such a way that the sum of the inner angles on one side is less than two right angles, then the two lines inevitably must intersect each other on that side if extended far enough.

[edit] Axioms
Euclidean geometry is an axiomatic system, in which all theorems ("true statements") are derived from a small number of axioms.[6] Near the beginning of the first book of the Elements, Euclid gives five postulates (axioms) for plane geometry, stated in terms of constructions (as translated by Thomas Heath):[7] "Let the following be postulated": 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. "To draw a straight line from any point to any point." "To produce [extend] a finite straight line continuously in a straight line." "To describe a circle with any centre and distance [radius]." "That all right angles are equal to one another." The parallel postulate: "That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines make the interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, the two straight lines, if

produced indefinitely, meet on that side on which are the angles less than the two right angles." Although Euclid's statement of the postulates only explicitly asserts the existence of the constructions, they are also taken to be unique. The Elements also include the following five "common notions": 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Things that equal the same thing also equal one another. If equals are added to equals, then the wholes are equal. If equals are subtracted from equals, then the remainders are equal. Things that coincide with one another equal one another. The whole is greater than the part.

[edit] The parallel postulate

Main article: Parallel postulate To the ancients, the parallel postulate seemed less obvious than the others. Euclid himself seems to have considered it as being qualitatively different from the others, as evidenced by the organization of the Elements: the first 28 propositions he presents are those that can be proved without it. Many alternative axioms can be formulated that have the same logical consequences as the parallel postulate. For example Playfair's axiom states: Through a point not on a given straight line, at most one line can be drawn that never meets the given line.

A proof from Euclid's elements that, given a line segment, an equilateral triangle exists that includes the segment as one of its sides. The proof is by construction: an equilateral triangle is made by drawing circles and centered on the points and , and taking one intersection of the circles as the third vertex of the triangle.

[edit] Methods of proof

Euclidean geometry is constructive. Postulates 1, 2, 3, and 5 assert the existence and uniqueness of certain geometric figures, and these assertions are of a constructive nature: that is, we are not only told that certain things exist, but are also given methods for creating them with no more than a compass and an unmarked straightedge.[8] In this sense, Euclidean geometry is more concrete than many modern axiomatic systems such as set theory, which often assert the existence of objects without saying how to construct them, or even assert the existence of objects that cannot be constructed within the theory.[9] Strictly speaking, the lines on paper are models of the objects defined within the formal system, rather than instances of those objects. For example a Euclidean straight line has no width, but any real drawn line will. Although nonconstructive methods are today considered by nearly all mathematicians to be just as sound as constructive ones, Euclid's constructive proofs often supplanted fallacious nonconstructive ones, e.g., some of the Pythagoreans' proofs involving irrational numbers, which usually required a statement such as "Find the greatest common measure of ..."[10] Euclid often used proof by contradiction. Euclidean geometry also allows the method of superposition, in which a figure is transferred to another point in space. For example, proposition I.4, side-angle-side congruence of triangles, is proved by moving one of the two triangles so that one of its sides coincides with the other triangle's equal side, and then proving that the other sides coincide as well. Some modern treatments add a sixth postulate, the rigidity of the triangle, which can be used as an alternative to superposition.[11]

[edit] System of measurement and arithmetic

Euclidean geometry has two fundamental types of measurements: angle and distance. The angle scale is absolute, and Euclid uses the right angle as his basic unit, so that, e.g., a 45-degree angle would be referred to as half of a right angle. The distance scale is relative; one arbitrarily picks a line segment with a certain length as the unit, and other distances are expressed in relation to it. A line in Euclidean geometry is a model of the real number line. A line segment is a part of a line that is bounded by two end points, and contains every point on the line between its end points. Addition is represented by a construction in which one line segment is copied onto the end of another line segment to extend its length, and similarly for subtraction. Measurements of area and volume are derived from distances. For example, a rectangle with a width of 3 and a length of 4 has an area that represents the product, 12. Because this geometrical interpretation of multiplication was limited to three dimensions, there was no direct way of interpreting the product of four or more numbers, and Euclid avoided such products, although they are implied, e.g., in the proof of book IX, proposition 20.

An example of congruence. The two figures on the left are congruent, while the third is similar to them. The last figure is neither. Note that congruences alter some properties, such as location and orientation, but leave others unchanged, like distance and angles. The latter sort of properties are called invariants and studying them is the essence of geometry. Euclid refers to a pair of lines, or a pair of planar or solid figures, as "equal" ( ) if their lengths, areas, or volumes are equal, and similarly for angles. The stronger term "congruent" refers to the idea that an entire figure is the same size and shape as another figure. Alternatively, two figures are congruent if one can be moved on top of the other so that it matches up with it exactly. (Flipping it over is allowed.) Thus, for example, a 2x6 rectangle and a 3x4 rectangle are equal but not congruent, and the letter R is congruent to its mirror image. Figures that would be congruent except for their differing sizes are referred to as similar.

[edit] Notation and terminology

[edit] Naming of points and figures
Points are customarily named using capital letters of the alphabet. Other figures, such as lines, triangles, or circles, are named by listing a sufficient number of points to pick them out unambiguously from the relevant figure, e.g., triangle ABC would typically be a triangle with vertices at points A, B, and C.

[edit] Complementary and supplementary angles

Angles whose sum is a right angle are called complementary, those whose sum is a straight angle are supplementary.

[edit] Modern versions of Euclid's notation

In modern terminology, angles would normally be measured in degrees or radians. Modern school textbooks often define separate figures called lines (infinite), rays (semi-infinite), and line segments (of finite length). Euclid, rather than discussing a ray as an object that extends to infinity in one direction, would normally use locutions such as "if the line is extended to a sufficient length," although he occasionally referred to "infinite lines." A "line" in Euclid could be either straight or curved, and he used the more specific term "straight line" when necessary.

[edit] Some important or well known results

The bridge of asses theorem states that A=B and C=D.

The sum of angles A, B, and C is equal to 180 degrees.

Pythagoras' theorem: The sum of the areas of the two squares on the legs (a and b) of a right triangle equals the area of the square on the hypotenuse (c).

Thales' theorem: if AC is a diameter, then the angle at B is a right angle.

[edit] The Bridge of Asses

The Bridge of Asses (Pons Asinorum) states that in isosceles triangles the angles at the base equal one another, and, if the equal straight lines are produced further, then the angles under the base equal one another.[12] Its name may be attributed to its frequent role as the first real test in the Elements of the intelligence of the reader and as a bridge to the harder propositions that followed. It might also be so named because of the geometrical figure's resemblance to a steep bridge which could only be crossed by a surefooted donkey.[13]

[edit] Congruence of triangles

Congruence of triangles is determined by specifying two sides and the angle between them (SAS), two angles and the side between them (ASA) or two angles and a corresponding adjacent side (AAS). Specifying two sides and an adjacent angle (SSA), however, can yield two distinct possible triangles. Triangles are congruent if they have all three sides equal (SSS), two sides and the angle between them equal (SAS), or two angles and a side equal (ASA) (Book I, propositions 4, 8, and 26). (Triangles with three equal angles are generally similar, but not necessarily congruent. Also, triangles with two equal sides and an adjacent angle are not necessarily equal.)

[edit] Sum of the angles of a triangle

The sum of the angles of a triangle is equal to straight angle (180 degrees).[14]

[edit] The Pythagorean theorem

The celebrated Pythagorean theorem (book I, proposition 47) states that in any right triangle, the area of the square whose side is the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angle) is equal to the sum of the areas of the squares whose sides are the two legs (the two sides that meet at a right angle).

[edit] Thales' theorem

Thales' theorem, named after Thales of Miletus states that if A, B, and C are points on a circle where the line AC is a diameter of the circle, then the angle ABC is a right angle. Cantor supposed that Thales proved his theorem by means of Euclid book I, prop 32 after the manner of Euclid book III, prop 31.[15] Tradition has it that Thales sacrificed an ox to celebrate this theorem.[16]

[edit] Scaling of area and volume

In modern terminology, the area of a plane figure is proportional to the square of any of its linear dimensions, , and the volume of a solid to the cube, . Euclid proved these [17] results in various special cases such as the area of a circle and the volume of a parallelepipedal solid.[18] Euclid determined some, but not all, of the relevant constants of proportionality. E.g., it was his successor Archimedes who proved that a sphere has 2/3 the volume of the circumscribing cylinder.[19]

[edit] Applications
This section requires expansion. Because of Euclidean geometry's fundamental status in mathematics, it would be impossible to give more than a representative sampling of applications here.

A surveyor uses a Level

Sphere packing applies to a stack of oranges.

A parabolic mirror brings parallel rays of light to a focus. As suggested by the etymology of the word, one of the earliest reasons for interest in geometry was surveying,[20] and certain practical results from Euclidean geometry, such as the right-angle property of the 3-4-5 triangle, were used long before they were proved formally.[21] The fundamental types of measurements in Euclidean geometry are distances and angles, and both of these quantities can be measured directly by a surveyor. Historically, distances were often measured by chains such as Gunter's chain, and angles using graduated circles and, later, the theodolite.

An application of Euclidean solid geometry is the determination of packing arrangements, such as the problem of finding the most efficient packing of spheres in n dimensions. This problem has applications in error detection and correction. Geometric optics uses Euclidean geometry to analyze the focusing of light by lenses and mirrors.

Geometry is used in art and architecture.

The water tower consists of a cone, a cylinder, and a hemisphere. Its volume can be calculated using solid geometry.

Geometry can be used to design origami. Geometry is used extensively in architecture. Geometry can be used to design origami. Some classical construction problems of geometry are impossible using compass and straightedge, but can be solved using origami.[22]

[edit] As a description of the structure of space

Euclid believed that his axioms were self-evident statements about physical reality. Euclid's proofs depend upon assumptions perhaps not obvious in Euclid's fundamental axioms,[23] in particular that certain movements of figures do not change their geometrical properties such as the lengths of sides and interior angles, the so-called Euclidean motions, which include translations and rotations of figures.[24] Taken as a physical description of space, postulate 2 ( a

line) asserts that space does not have holes or boundaries (in other words, space is homogeneous and unbounded); postulate 4 (equality of right angles) says that space is isotropic and figures may be moved to any location while maintaining congruence; and postulate 5 (the parallel postulate) that space is flat (has no intrinsic curvature).[25] As discussed in more detail below, Einstein's theory of relativity significantly modifies this view. The ambiguous character of the axioms as originally formulated by Euclid makes it possible for different commentators to disagree about some of their other implications for the structure of space, such as whether or not it is infinite[26] (see below) and what its topology is. Modern, more rigorous reformulations of the system[27] typically aim for a cleaner separation of these issues. Interpreting Euclid's axioms in the spirit of this more modern approach, axioms 1-4 are consistent with either infinite or finite space (as in elliptic geometry), and all five axioms are consistent with a variety of topologies (e.g., a plane, a cylinder, or a torus for two-dimensional Euclidean geometry).

[edit] Later work

[edit] Archimedes and Apollonius

A sphere has 2/3 the volume and surface area of its circumscribing cylinder. A sphere and cylinder were placed on the tomb of Archimedes at his request. Archimedes (ca. 287 BCE ca. 212 BCE), a colorful figure about whom many historical anecdotes are recorded, is remembered along with Euclid as one of the greatest of ancient mathematicians. Although the foundations of his work were put in place by Euclid, his work, unlike Euclid's, is believed to have been entirely original.[28] He proved equations for the volumes and areas of various figures in two and three dimensions, and enunciated the Archimedean property of finite numbers. Apollonius of Perga (ca. 262 BCEca. 190 BCE) is mainly known for his investigation of conic sections.

Ren Descartes. Portrait after Frans Hals, 1648.

[edit] The 17th century: Descartes

Ren Descartes (15961650) developed analytic geometry, an alternative method for formalizing geometry.[29] In this approach, a point is represented by its Cartesian (x, y) coordinates, a line is represented by its equation, and so on. In Euclid's original approach, the Pythagorean theorem follows from Euclid's axioms. In the Cartesian approach, the axioms are the axioms of algebra, and the equation expressing the Pythagorean theorem is then a definition of one of the terms in Euclid's axioms, which are now considered to be theorems. The equation

defining the distance between two points P = (p, q) and Q=(r, s) is then known as the Euclidean metric, and other metrics define non-Euclidean geometries. In terms of analytic geometry, the restriction of classical geometry to compass and straightedge constructions means a restriction to first- and second-order equations, e.g., y = 2x + 1 (a line), or x2 + y2 = 7 (a circle). Also in the 17th century, Girard Desargues, motivated by the theory of perspective, introduced the concept of idealized points, lines, and planes at infinity. The result can be considered as a type of generalized geometry, projective geometry, but it can also be used to produce proofs in ordinary Euclidean geometry in which the number of special cases is reduced.[30]

Squaring the circle: the areas of this square and this circle are equal. In 1882, it was proven that this figure cannot be constructed in a finite number of steps with an idealized compass and straightedge.

[edit] The 18th century

Geometers of the 18th century struggled to define the boundaries of the Euclidean system. Many tried in vain to prove the fifth postulate from the first four. By 1763 at least 28 different proofs had been published, but all were found to be incorrect.[31] Leading up to this period, geometers also tried to determine what constructions could be accomplished in Euclidean geometry. For example, the problem of trisecting an angle with a compass and straightedge is one that naturally occurs within the theory, since the axioms refer to constructive operations that can be carried out with those tools. However, centuries of efforts failed to find a solution to this problem, until Pierre Wantzel published a proof in 1837 that such a construction was impossible. Other constructions that were proved to be impossible include doubling the cube and squaring the circle. In the case of doubling the cube, the impossibility of the construction originates from the fact that the compass and straightedge method involve firstand second-order equations, while doubling a cube requires the solution of a third-order equation. Euler discussed a generalization of Euclidean geometry called affine geometry, which retains the fifth postulate unmodified while weakening postulates three and four in a way that eliminates the notions of angle (whence right triangles become meaningless) and of equality of length of line segments in general (whence circles become meaningless) while retaining the notions of parallelism as an equivalence relation between lines, and equality of length of parallel line segments (so line segments continue to have a midpoint).

[edit] The 19th century and non-Euclidean geometry

In the early 19th century, Carnot and Mbius systematically developed the use of signed angles and line segments as a way of simplifying and unifying results.[32]

The century's most significant development in geometry occurred when, around 1830, Jnos Bolyai and Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky separately published work on non-Euclidean geometry, in which the parallel postulate is not valid.[33] Since non-Euclidean geometry is provably self-consistent, the parallel postulate cannot be proved from the other postulates. In the 19th century, it was also realized that Euclid's ten axioms and common notions do not suffice to prove all of theorems stated in the Elements. For example, Euclid assumed implicitly that any line contains at least two points, but this assumption cannot be proved from the other axioms, and therefore needs to be an axiom itself. The very first geometric proof in the Elements, shown in the figure above, is that any line segment is part of a triangle; Euclid constructs this in the usual way, by drawing circles around both endpoints and taking their intersection as the third vertex. His axioms, however, do not guarantee that the circles actually intersect, because they do not assert the geometrical property of continuity, which in Cartesian terms is equivalent to the completeness property of the real numbers. Starting with Moritz Pasch in 1882, many improved axiomatic systems for geometry have been proposed, the best known being those of Hilbert,[34] George Birkhoff,[35] and Tarski.[36]

[edit] The 20th century and general relativity

A disproof of Euclidean geometry as a description of physical space. In a 1919 test of the general theory of relativity, stars (marked with short horizontal lines) were photographed during a solar eclipse. The rays of starlight were bent by the Sun's gravity on their way to the earth. This is interpreted as evidence in favor of Einstein's prediction that gravity would cause deviations from Euclidean geometry. Einstein's theory of general relativity shows that the true geometry of spacetime is non-Euclidean geometry.[37] For example, if a triangle is constructed out of three rays of light, then in general the interior angles do not add up to 180 degrees due to gravity. A relatively weak gravitational field, such as the Earth's or the sun's, is represented by a metric that is approximately, but not exactly, Euclidean. Until the 20th century, there was no technology capable of detecting the

deviations from Euclidean geometry, but Einstein predicted that such deviations would exist. They were later verified by observations such as the slight bending of starlight by the Sun during a solar eclipse in 1919, and non-Euclidean geometry is now, for example, an integral part of the software that runs the GPS system.[38] It is possible to object to the non-Euclidean interpretation of general relativity on the grounds that light rays might be improper physical models of Euclid's lines, or that relativity could be rephrased so as to avoid the geometrical interpretations. However, one of the consequences of Einstein's theory is that there is no possible physical test that can do any better than a beam of light as a model of a geometrical line. Thus, the only logical possibilities are to accept non-Euclidean geometry as physically real, or to reject the entire notion of physical tests of the axioms of geometry, which can then be imagined as a formal system without any intrinsic real-world meaning.

[edit] Treatment of infinity

[edit] Infinite objects
Euclid sometimes distinguished explicitly between "finite lines" (e.g., Postulate 2) and "infinite lines" (book I, proposition 12). However, he typically did not make such distinctions unless they were necessary. The postulates do not explicitly refer to infinite lines, although for example some commentators interpret postulate 3, existence of a circle with any radius, as implying that space is infinite.[26] The notion of infinitesimally small quantities had previously been discussed extensively by the Eleatic School, but nobody had been able to put them on a firm logical basis, with paradoxes such as Zeno's paradox occurring that had not been resolved to universal satisfaction. Euclid used the method of exhaustion rather than infinitesimals.[39] Later ancient commentators such as Proclus (410-485 CE) treated many questions about infinity as issues demanding proof and, e.g., Proclus claimed to prove the infinite divisibility of a line, based on a proof by contradiction in which he considered the cases of even and odd numbers of points constituting it.[40] At the turn of the 20th century, Giuseppe Veronese produced controversial work on nonArchimedean models of Euclidean geometry, in which the distance between two points may be infinite or infinitesimal, in the NewtonLeibniz sense.[41] Fifty years later, Abraham Robinson provided a rigorous logical foundation for Veronese's work.[42]

[edit] Infinite processes

One reason that the ancients treated the parallel postulate as less certain than the others is that verifying it physically would require us to inspect two lines to check that they never intersected, even at some very distant point, and this inspection could potentially take an infinite amount of time.[43]

The modern formulation of proof by induction was not developed until the 17th century, but some later commentators consider it to be implicit in some of Euclid's proofs, e.g., the proof of the infinitude of primes.[44] Supposed paradoxes involving infinite series, such as Zeno's paradox, predated Euclid. Euclid avoided such discussions, giving, for example, the expression for the partial sums of the geometric series in IX.35 without commenting on the possibility of letting the number of terms become infinite.

[edit] Logical basis

This article needs attention from an expert on the subject. See the talk page for details. WikiProject Mathematics or the Mathematics Portal may be able to help recruit an expert.
(December 2010)

This section requires expansion. See also: Hilbert's axioms, Axiomatic system, and Real closed field

[edit] Classical logic

Euclid frequently used the method of proof by contradiction, and therefore the traditional presentation of Euclidean geometry assumes classical logic, in which every proposition is either true or false, i.e., for any proposition P, the proposition "P or not P" is automatically true.

[edit] Modern standards of rigor

Placing Euclidean geometry on a solid axiomatic basis was a preoccupation of mathematicians for centuries.[45] The role of primitive notions, or undefined concepts, was clearly put forward by Alessandro Padoa of the Peano delegation at the 1900 Paris conference:[45][46] ...when we begin to formulate the theory, we can imagine that the undefined symbols are completely devoid of meaning and that the unproved propositions are simply conditions imposed upon the undefined symbols. Then, the system of ideas that we have initially chosen is simply one interpretation of the undefined symbols; but..this interpretation can be ignored by the reader, who is free to replace it in his mind by another interpretation.. that satisfies the conditions... Logical questions thus become completely independent of empirical or psychological questions... The system of undefined symbols can then be regarded as the abstraction obtained from the specialized theories that result when...the system of undefined symbols is successively replaced by each of the interpretations...

Padoa, Essai d'une thorie algbrique des nombre entiers, avec une Introduction logique une thorie dductive qulelconque That is, mathematics is context-independent knowledge within a hierarchical framework. As said by Bertrand Russell:[47] If our hypothesis is about anything, and not about some one or more particular things, then our deductions constitute mathematics. Thus, mathematics may be defined as the subject in which we never know what we are talking about, nor whether what we are saying is true. Bertrand Russell, Mathematics and the metaphysicians Such foundational approaches range between foundationalism and formalism.

[edit] Axiomatic formulations

Geometry is the science of correct reasoning on incorrect figures. George Poly, How to Solve It, p. 208
y

Euclid's axioms: In his dissertation to Trinity College, Cambridge, Bertrand Russell summarized the changing role of Euclid's geometry in the minds of philosophers up to that time.[48] It was a conflict between certain knowledge, independent of experiment, and empiricism, requiring experimental input. This issue became clear as it was discovered that the parallel postulate was not necessarily valid and its applicability was an empirical matter, deciding whether the applicable geometry was Euclidean or non-Euclidean. Hilbert's axioms: Hilbert's axioms had the goal of identifying a simple and complete set of independent axioms from which the most important geometric theorems could be deduced. The outstanding objectives were to make Euclidean geometry rigorous (avoiding hidden assumptions) and to make clear the ramifications of the parallel postulate. Birkhoff's axioms: Birkhoff proposed four postulates for Euclidean geometry that can be confirmed experimentally with scale and protractor.[49][50][51] The notions of angle and distance become primitive concepts.[52] Tarski's axioms:Tarski (19021983) and his students defined elementary Euclidean geometry as the geometry that can be expressed in first-order logic and does not depend on set theory for its logical basis,[53] in contrast to Hilbert's axioms which involve point sets.[54] Tarski proved his axiomatic formulation of elementary Euclidean geometry to be consistent and complete in a certain sense: there is an algorithm which, for every proposition, can show it to be either true or false.[36] (This doesn't violate Gdel's theorem, because Euclidean geometry cannot describe a sufficient amount of arithmetic for the theorem to apply.[55]) This is equivalent to the decidability of real closed fields, of which elementary Euclidean geometry is a model.

[edit] Constructive approaches and pedagogy

The process of abstract axiomatization as exemplified by Hilbert's axioms reduces geometry to theorem proving or predicate logic. In contrast, the Greeks used construction postulates, and

emphasized problem solving.[56] For the Greeks, constructions are more primitive than existence propositions, and can be used to prove existence propositions, but not vice versa. To describe problem solving adequately requires a richer system of logical concepts.[56] The contrast in approach may be summarized:[57]
y y

Axiomatic proof: Proofs are deductive derivations of propositions from primitive premises that are true in some sense. The aim is to justify the proposition. Analytic proof: Proofs are non-deductive derivations of hypothesis from problems. The aim is to find hypotheses capable of giving a solution to the problem. One can argue that Euclid's axioms were arrived upon in this manner. In particular, it is thought that Euclid felt the parallel postulate was forced upon him, as indicated by his reluctance to make use of it,[58] and his arrival upon it by the method of contradiction.[59]

Andrei Nicholaevich Kolmogorov proposed a problem solving basis for geometry.[60][61] This work was a precursor of a modern formulation in terms of constructive type theory.[62] This development has implications for pedagogy as well.[63] If proof simply follows conviction of truth rather than contributing to its construction and is only experienced as a demonstration of something already known to be true, it is likely to remain meaningless and purposeless in the eyes of students. Celia Hoyles, The curricular shaping of students' approach to proof

[edit] See also

y y y y y y y y y y y y

Analytic geometry Type theory Interactive geometry software Non-Euclidean geometry Ordered geometry Incidence geometry Metric geometry Birkhoff's axioms Hilbert's axioms Parallel postulate Schopenhauer's criticism of the proofs of the Parallel Postulate Cartesian coordinate system

[edit] Classical theorems

y y y y y y y

Ceva's theorem Heron's formula Nine-point circle Pythagorean theorem Tartaglia's formula Menelaus' theorem Angle bisector theorem

Butterfly theorem

[edit] Notes
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ^ Eves, vol. 1., p. 19 ^ Eves (1963), vol. 1, p. 10 ^ Eves, p. 19 ^ Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler (1973), p. 47 ^ Euclid, book IX, proposition 20 ^ The assumptions of Euclid are discussed from a modern perspective in Harold E. Wolfe (2007). Introduction to Non-Euclidean Geometry. Mill Press. p. 9. ISBN 1406718521. http://books.google.com/books?id=VPHn3MutWhQC&pg=PA9. 7. ^ tr. Heath, pp. 195-202. 8. ^ Ball, p. 56 9. ^ Within Euclid's assumptions, it is quite easy to give a formula for area of triangles and squares. However, in a more general context like set theory, it is not as easy to prove that the area of a square is the sum of areas of its pieces, for example. See Lebesgue measure and Banach-Tarski paradox. 10. ^ Daniel Shanks (2002). Solved and Unsolved Problems in Number Theory. American Mathematical Society. 11. ^ Coxeter, p. 5 12. ^ Euclid, book I, proposition 5, tr. Heath, p. 251 13. ^ Ignoring the alleged difficulty of Book I, Proposition 5, Sir Thomas L. Heath mentions another interpretation. This rests on the resemblance of the figure's lower straight lines to a steeplyinclined bridge which could be crossed by an ass but not by a horse. "But there is another view (as I have learnt lately) which is more complimentary to the ass. It is that, the figure of the proposition being like that of a trestlebridge, with a ramp at each end which is more practicable the flatter the figure is drawn, the bridge is such that, while a horse could not surmount the ramp, an ass could; in other words, the term is meant to refer to the surefootedness of the ass rather than to any want of intelligence on his part." (in "Excursis II," volume 1 of Heath's translation of The Thirteen Books of the Elements.) 14. ^ Euclid, book I, proposition 32 15. ^ Heath, p. 135, Extract of page 135 16. ^ Heath, p. 318 17. ^ Euclid, book XII, proposition 2 18. ^ Euclid, book XI, proposition 33 19. ^ Ball, p. 66 20. ^ Ball, p. 5 21. ^ Eves, vol. 1, p. 5; Mlodinow, p. 7 22. ^ Origami Geometric Constructions, accessed 2009 Feb 25 23. ^ Richard J. Trudeau (2008). "Euclid's axioms". The Non-Euclidean Revolution. Birkhuser. pp. 39 'ff. ISBN 0817647821. http://books.google.com/books?id=YRB4VBCLB3IC&pg=PA39. 24. ^ See, for example: Luciano da Fontoura Costa, Roberto Marcondes Cesar (2001). Shape analysis and classification: theory and practice. CRC Press. p. 314. ISBN 0849334934. http://books.google.com/books?id=x_wiWedtc0cC&pg=PA314. and Helmut Pottmann,

Johannes Wallner (2010). Computational Line Geometry. Springer. p. 60. ISBN 3642040179. http://books.google.com/books?id=3Mk2JIJKsGwC&pg=PA60. The group of motions underlie the metric notions of geometry. See Felix Klein (2004). Elementary Mathematics from an Advanced Standpoint: Geometry (Reprint of 1939 Macmillan Company ed.). Courier Dover. p. 167. ISBN 0486434818. http://books.google.com/books?id=fj-ryrSBuxAC&pg=PA167. 25. ^ Roger Penrose (2007). The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. Vintage Books. p. 29. ISBN 0679776311. http://books.google.com/books?id=coahAAAACAAJ&dq=editions:cYahAAAACAAJ& hl=en&ei=i7DZTI62K46asAObz-jJBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=bookthumbnail&resnum=1&ved=0CCcQ6wEwAA. 26. ^ a b Heath, p. 200 27. ^ e.g., Tarski (1951) 28. ^ Eves, p. 27 29. ^ Ball, pp. 268ff 30. ^ Eves (1963) 31. ^ Hofstadter 1979, p. 91. 32. ^ Eves (1963), p. 64 33. ^ Ball, p. 485 34. ^ * Howard Eves, 1997 (1958). Foundations and Fundamental Concepts of Mathematics. Dover. 35. ^ Birkhoff, G. D., 1932, "A Set of Postulates for Plane Geometry (Based on Scale and Protractors)," Annals of Mathematics 33. 36. ^ a b Tarski (1951) 37. ^ Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler (1973), p. 191 38. ^ Rizos, Chris. University of New South Wales. GPS Satellite Signals. 1999. 39. ^ Ball, p. 31 40. ^ Heath, p. 268 41. ^ Giuseppe Veronese, On Non-Archimedean Geometry, 1908. English translation in Real Numbers, Generalizations of the Reals, and Theories of Continua, ed. Philip Ehrlich, Kluwer, 1994. 42. ^ Robinson, Abraham (1966). Non-standard analysis. 43. ^ For the assertion that this was the historical reason for the ancients considering the parallel postulate less obvious than the others, see Nagel and Newman 1958, p. 9. 44. ^ Cajori (1918), p. 197 45. ^ a b A detailed discussion can be found in James T. Smith (2000). "Chapter 2: Foundations". Methods of geometry. Wiley. pp. 19 ff. ISBN 0471251836. http://books.google.com/books?id=mWpWplOVQ6MC&pg=RA1-PA19. 46. ^ Socit franaise de philosophie (1900). Revue de mtaphysique et de morale, Volume 8. Hachette. p. 592. http://books.google.com/books?id=4aoLAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA592. 47. ^ Bertrand Russell (2000). "Mathematics and the metaphysicians". In James Roy Newman. The world of mathematics. 3 (Reprint of Simon and Schuster 1956 ed.). Courier Dover Publications. p. 1577. ISBN 0486411516. http://books.google.com/books?id=_b2ShqRj8YMC&pg=PA1577.

48. ^ Bertrand Russell (1897). "Introduction". An essay on the foundations of geometry. Cambridge University Press. http://books.google.com/books?id=NecGAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA1. 49. ^ George David Birkhoff, Ralph Beatley (1999). "Chapter 2: The five fundamental principles". Basic Geometry (3rd ed.). AMS Bookstore. pp. 38 ff. ISBN 0821821016. http://books.google.com/books?id=TB6xYdomdjQC&pg=PA38. 50. ^ James T. Smith. "Chapter 3: Elementary Euclidean Geometry". Cited work. pp. 84 ff. http://books.google.com/books?id=mWpWplOVQ6MC&pg=RA1-PA84. 51. ^ Edwin E. Moise (1990). Elementary geometry from an advanced standpoint (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0201508672. http://books.google.com/books?cd=1&id=3UjvAAAAMAAJ&dq=isbn%3A9780201508 673&q=Birkhoff#search_anchor. 52. ^ John R. Silvester (2001). "1.4 Hilbert and Birkhoff". Geometry: ancient and modern. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198508255. http://books.google.com/books?id=VtH_QG6scSUC&pg=PA5. 53. ^ Alfred Tarski (2007). "What is elementary geometry". In Leon Henkin, Patrick Suppes & Alfred Tarski. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics - The Axiomatic Method with Special Reference to Geometry and Physics (Proceedings of International Symposium at Berkeley 1957-58; Reprint ed.). Brouwer Press. p. 16. ISBN 1406753556. http://books.google.com/books?id=eVVKtnKzfnUC&pg=PA16. "we regard as elementary that part of Euclidean geometry which can be formulated and established without the help of any set-theoretical devices" 54. ^ Keith Simmons (2009). "Tarski's logic". In Dov M. Gabbay, John Woods. Logic from Russell to Church. Elsevier. p. 574. ISBN 0444516204. http://books.google.com/books?id=K5dU9bEKencC&pg=PA574. 55. ^ Franzn 2005, p. 25-26. 56. ^ a b Petri Menp (1999). "From backward reduction to configurational analysis". In Michael Otte, Marco Panza. Analysis and synthesis in mathematics: history and philosophy. Springer. p. 210. ISBN 0792345703. http://books.google.com/books?id=WFav-N0tv7AC&pg=PA210. 57. ^ Carlo Cellucci (2008). "Why proof? What is proof?". In Rossella Lupacchini, Giovanna Corsi. Deduction, Computation, Experiment: Exploring the Effectiveness of Proof. Springer. p. 1. ISBN 8847007836. http://books.google.com/books?id=jVPW_qsYDgC&printsec=frontcover. 58. ^ Eric W. Weisstein (2003). "Euclid's postulates". CRC concise encyclopedia of mathematics (2nd ed.). CRC Press. p. 942. ISBN 1584883472. http://books.google.com/books?id=Zg1_QZsylysC&pg=PA942. 59. ^ Deborah J. Bennett (2004). Logic made easy: how to know when language deceives you. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 34. ISBN 0393057488. http://books.google.com/books?id=_fo3vTO8qGcC&pg=PA34. 60. ^ AN Kolmogorov, AF Semenovich, RS Cherkasov (1982). Geometry: A textbook for grades 6-8 of secondary school [Geometriya. Uchebnoe posobie dlya 6-8 klassov srednie shkoly] (3rd ed.). Moscow: "Prosveshchenie" Publishers. pp. 372376. A description of the approach, which was based upon geometric transformations, can be found in Teaching geometry in the USSR Chernysheva, Firsov, and Teljakovskii

61. ^ Viktor Vasil evich Prasolov, Vladimir Mikha lovich Tikhomirov (2001). Geometry. AMS Bookstore. p. 198. ISBN 0821820389. http://books.google.com/books?id=t7kbhDDUFSkC&pg=PA198. 62. ^ Petri Menp (1998). "Analytic program derivation in type theory". In Giovanni Sambin, Jan M. Smith. Twenty-five years of constructive type theory: proceedings of a congress held in Venice, October 1995. Oxford University Press. p. 113. ISBN 0198501277. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=pLnKggT_In4C&oi=fnd&pg=PA113. 63. ^ Celia Hoyles (Feb. 1997). "The curricular shaping of students' approach to proof". For the Learning of Mathematics (FLM Publishing Association) 17 (1): 716. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248217. Retrieved 29/06/2010 09:39.

[edit] References
y

y y y y

y y y y y

Ball, W.W. Rouse (1960). A Short Account of the History of Mathematics (4th ed. [Reprint. Original publication: London: Macmillan & Co., 1908] ed.). New York: Dover Publications. pp. 5062. ISBN 0-486-20630-0. Coxeter, H.S.M. (1961). Introduction to Geometry. New York: Wiley. Eves, Howard (1963). A Survey of Geometry. Allyn and Bacon. Franzn, Torkel (2005). Gdel's Theorem: An Incomplete Guide to its Use and Abuse. AK Peters. ISBN 1-56881-238-8. Heath, Thomas L. (1956) (3 vols.). The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements (2nd ed. [Facsimile. Original publication: Cambridge University Press, 1925] ed.). New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-60088-2 (vol. 1), ISBN 0-486-60089-0 (vol. 2), ISBN 0486-60090-4 (vol. 3). Heath's authoritative translation of Euclid's Elements plus his extensive historical research and detailed commentary throughout the text. Hofstadter, Douglas R. (1979). Gdel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Basic Books. Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler (1973). Gravitation. W.H. Freeman. Mlodinow (2001). Euclid's Window. The Free Press. Nagel, E. and Newman, J.R. (1958). Gdel's Proof. New York University Press. Alfred Tarski (1951) A Decision Method for Elementary Algebra and Geometry. Univ. of California Press.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometry

Geometry
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search For other uses, see Geometry (disambiguation).

An illustration of Desargues' theorem, an important result in Euclidean and projective geometry.

Oxyrhynchus papyrus (P.Oxy. I 29) showing fragment of Euclid's Elements Geometry (Ancient Greek: ; geo- "earth", -metri "measurement") is a branch of mathematics concerned with questions of shape, size, relative position of figures, and the properties of space. Geometry is one of the oldest mathematical sciences. Initially a body of practical knowledge concerning lengths, areas, and volumes, in the 3rd century BC geometry was put into an axiomatic form by Euclid, whose treatmentEuclidean geometryset a standard for many centuries to follow. Archimedes developed ingenious techniques for calculating areas and volumes, in many ways anticipating modern integral calculus. The field of astronomy, especially mapping the positions of the stars and planets on the celestial sphere and describing the relationship between movements of celestial bodies, served as an important source of geometric problems during the next one and a half millennia. A mathematician who works in the field of geometry is called a geometer. The introduction of coordinates by Ren Descartes and the concurrent development of algebra marked a new stage for geometry, since geometric figures, such as plane curves, could now be represented analytically, i.e., with functions and equations. This played a key role in the emergence of infinitesimal calculus in the 17th century. Furthermore, the theory of perspective

showed that there is more to geometry than just the metric properties of figures: perspective is the origin of projective geometry. The subject of geometry was further enriched by the study of intrinsic structure of geometric objects that originated with Euler and Gauss and led to the creation of topology and differential geometry. In Euclid's time there was no clear distinction between physical space and geometrical space. Since the 19th-century discovery of non-Euclidean geometry, the concept of space has undergone a radical transformation, and the question arose which geometrical space best fits physical space. With the rise of formal mathematics in the 20th century, also 'space' (and 'point', 'line', 'plane') lost its intuitive contents, so today we have to distinguish between physical space, geometrical spaces (in which 'space', 'point' etc. still have their intuitive meaning) and abstract spaces. Contemporary geometry considers manifolds, spaces that are considerably more abstract than the familiar Euclidean space, which they only approximately resemble at small scales. These spaces may be endowed with additional structure, allowing one to speak about length. Modern geometry has multiple strong bonds with physics, exemplified by the ties between pseudo-Riemannian geometry and general relativity. One of the youngest physical theories, string theory, is also very geometric in flavour. While the visual nature of geometry makes it initially more accessible than other parts of mathematics, such as algebra or number theory, geometric language is also used in contexts far removed from its traditional, Euclidean provenance (for example, in fractal geometry and algebraic geometry).[1]

Contents
[hide]
y

y y

1 Overview o 1.1 Practical geometry o 1.2 Axiomatic geometry o 1.3 Geometric constructions o 1.4 Numbers in geometry o 1.5 Geometry of position o 1.6 Geometry beyond Euclid o 1.7 Dimension o 1.8 Symmetry o 1.9 Modern geometry 2 History of geometry 3 Contemporary geometry o 3.1 Euclidean geometry o 3.2 Differential geometry o 3.3 Topology and geometry o 3.4 Algebraic geometry 4 See also o 4.1 Lists o 4.2 Related topics

5 References o 5.1 Notes o 5.2 Bibliography 6 External links

[edit] Overview

Visual proof of the Pythagorean theorem for the (3, 4, 5) triangle as in the Chou Pei Suan Ching 500200 BC. The recorded development of geometry spans more than two millennia. It is hardly surprising that perceptions of what constituted geometry evolved throughout the ages.

[edit] Practical geometry

Geometry originated as a practical science concerned with surveying, measurements, areas, and volumes. Among the notable accomplishments one finds formulas for lengths, areas and volumes, such as Pythagorean theorem, circumference and area of a circle, area of a triangle, volume of a cylinder, sphere, and a pyramid. A method of computing certain inaccessible distances or heights based on similarity of geometric figures is attributed to Thales. Development of astronomy led to emergence of trigonometry and spherical trigonometry, together with the attendant computational techniques.

[edit] Axiomatic geometry

An illustration of Euclid's parallel postulate See also: Euclidean geometry Euclid took a more abstract approach in his Elements, one of the most influential books ever written. Euclid introduced certain axioms, or postulates, expressing primary or self-evident properties of points, lines, and planes. He proceeded to rigorously deduce other properties by mathematical reasoning. The characteristic feature of Euclid's approach to geometry was its rigor, and it has come to be known as axiomatic or synthetic geometry. At the start of the 19th century the discovery of non-Euclidean geometries by Gauss, Lobachevsky, Bolyai, and others led to a revival of interest, and in the 20th century David Hilbert employed axiomatic reasoning in an attempt to provide a modern foundation of geometry.

[edit] Geometric constructions

Main article: Compass and straightedge constructions Ancient scientists paid special attention to constructing geometric objects that had been described in some other way. Classical instruments allowed in geometric constructions are those with compass and straightedge. However, some problems turned out to be difficult or impossible to solve by these means alone, and ingenious constructions using parabolas and other curves, as well as mechanical devices, were found.

[edit] Numbers in geometry

The Pythagoreans discovered that the sides of a triangle could have incommensurable lengths. In ancient Greece the Pythagoreans considered the role of numbers in geometry. However, the discovery of incommensurable lengths, which contradicted their philosophical views, made them abandon (abstract) numbers in favor of (concrete) geometric quantities, such as length and area of figures. Numbers were reintroduced into geometry in the form of coordinates by Descartes, who realized that the study of geometric shapes can be facilitated by their algebraic representation. Analytic geometry applies methods of algebra to geometric questions, typically by relating geometric curves and algebraic equations. These ideas played a key role in the

development of calculus in the 17th century and led to discovery of many new properties of plane curves. Modern algebraic geometry considers similar questions on a vastly more abstract level.

[edit] Geometry of position

Main articles: Projective geometry and Topology Even in ancient times, geometers considered questions of relative position or spatial relationship of geometric figures and shapes. Some examples are given by inscribed and circumscribed circles of polygons, lines intersecting and tangent to conic sections, the Pappus and Menelaus configurations of points and lines. In the Middle Ages new and more complicated questions of this type were considered: What is the maximum number of spheres simultaneously touching a given sphere of the same radius (kissing number problem)? What is the densest packing of spheres of equal size in space (Kepler conjecture)? Most of these questions involved 'rigid' geometrical shapes, such as lines or spheres. Projective, convex and discrete geometry are three sub-disciplines within present day geometry that deal with these and related questions. Leonhard Euler, in studying problems like the Seven Bridges of Knigsberg, considered the most fundamental properties of geometric figures based solely on shape, independent of their metric properties. Euler called this new branch of geometry geometria situs (geometry of place), but it is now known as topology. Topology grew out of geometry, but turned into a large independent discipline. It does not differentiate between objects that can be continuously deformed into each other. The objects may nevertheless retain some geometry, as in the case of hyperbolic knots.

[edit] Geometry beyond Euclid

Differential geometry uses tools from calculus to study problems in geometry. For nearly two thousand years since Euclid, while the range of geometrical questions asked and answered inevitably expanded, basic understanding of space remained essentially the same. Immanuel Kant argued that there is only one, absolute, geometry, which is known to be true a priori by an inner faculty of mind: Euclidean geometry was synthetic a priori.[2] This dominant view was overturned by the revolutionary discovery of non-Euclidean geometry in the works of Gauss (who never published his theory), Bolyai, and Lobachevsky, who demonstrated that ordinary Euclidean space is only one possibility for development of geometry. A broad vision of the subject of geometry was then expressed by Riemann in his 1867 inauguration lecture ber

die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen (On the hypotheses on which geometry is based),[3] published only after his death. Riemann's new idea of space proved crucial in Einstein's general relativity theory and Riemannian geometry, which considers very general spaces in which the notion of length is defined, is a mainstay of modern geometry.

[edit] Dimension
Where the traditional geometry allowed dimensions 1 (a line), 2 (a plane) and 3 (our ambient world conceived of as three-dimensional space), mathematicians have used higher dimensions for nearly two centuries. Dimension has gone through stages of being any natural number n, possibly infinite with the introduction of Hilbert space, and any positive real number in fractal geometry. Dimension theory is a technical area, initially within general topology, that discusses definitions; in common with most mathematical ideas, dimension is now defined rather than an intuition. Connected topological manifolds have a well-defined dimension; this is a theorem (invariance of domain) rather than anything a priori. The issue of dimension still matters to geometry, in the absence of complete answers to classic questions. Dimensions 3 of space and 4 of space-time are special cases in geometric topology. Dimension 10 or 11 is a key number in string theory. Research may bring a satisfactory geometric reason for the significance of 10 and 11 dimensions.

[edit] Symmetry

A tiling of the hyperbolic plane The theme of symmetry in geometry is nearly as old as the science of geometry itself. The circle, regular polygons and platonic solids held deep significance for many ancient philosophers and were investigated in detail by the time of Euclid. Symmetric patterns occur in nature and were artistically rendered in a multitude of forms, including the bewildering graphics of M. C. Escher. Nonetheless, it was not until the second half of 19th century that the unifying role of symmetry in foundations of geometry had been recognized. Felix Klein's Erlangen program proclaimed that, in a very precise sense, symmetry, expressed via the notion of a transformation group, determines what geometry is. Symmetry in classical Euclidean geometry is represented by

congruences and rigid motions, whereas in projective geometry an analogous role is played by collineations, geometric transformations that take straight lines into straight lines. However it was in the new geometries of Bolyai and Lobachevsky, Riemann, Clifford and Klein, and Sophus Lie that Klein's idea to 'define a geometry via its symmetry group' proved most influential. Both discrete and continuous symmetries play prominent role in geometry, the former in topology and geometric group theory, the latter in Lie theory and Riemannian geometry. A different type of symmetry is the principle of duality in projective geometry (see Duality (projective geometry)) among other fields. This is a meta-phenomenon which can roughly be described as follows: in any theorem, exchange point with plane, join with meet, lies in with contains, and you will get an equally true theorem. A similar and closely related form of duality exists between a vector space and its dual space.

[edit] Modern geometry

Modern geometry is the title of a popular textbook by Dubrovin, Novikov and Fomenko first published in 1979 (in Russian). At close to 1000 pages, the book has one major thread: geometric structures of various types on manifolds and their applications in contemporary theoretical physics. A quarter century after its publication, differential geometry, algebraic geometry, symplectic geometry and Lie theory presented in the book remain among the most visible areas of modern geometry, with multiple connections with other parts of mathematics and physics.

[edit] History of geometry

Main article: History of geometry

Woman teaching geometry. Illustration at the beginning of a medieval translation of Euclid's Elements, (c.1310) The earliest recorded beginnings of geometry can be traced to ancient Mesopotamia, Egypt, and the Indus Valley from around 3000 BCE. Early geometry was a collection of empirically discovered principles concerning lengths, angles, areas, and volumes, which were developed to

meet some practical need in surveying, construction, astronomy, and various crafts. The earliest known texts on geometry are the Egyptian Rhind Papyrus and Moscow Papyrus, the Babylonian clay tablets, and the Indian Shulba Sutras, while the Chinese had the work of Mozi, Zhang Heng, and the Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art, edited by Liu Hui. South of Egypt the ancient Nubians established a system of geometry including early versions of sun clocks.[4][5] Until relatively recently (i.e. the last 200 years), the teaching and development of geometry in Europe and the Islamic world was based on Greek geometry.[6][7] Euclid's Elements (c. 300 BCE) was one of the most important early texts on geometry, in which he presented geometry in an ideal axiomatic form, which came to be known as Euclidean geometry. The treatise is not, as is sometimes thought, a compendium of all that Hellenistic mathematicians knew about geometry at that time; rather, it is an elementary introduction to it;[8] Euclid himself wrote eight more advanced books on geometry. We know from other references that Euclids was not the first elementary geometry textbook, but the others fell into disuse and were lost.[citation needed] In the Middle Ages, mathematics in medieval Islam contributed to the development of geometry, especially algebraic geometry[9][10][unreliable source?] and geometric algebra.[11] Al-Mahani (b. 853) conceived the idea of reducing geometrical problems such as duplicating the cube to problems in algebra.[10] Th bit ibn Qurra (known as Thebit in Latin) (836901) dealt with arithmetical operations applied to ratios of geometrical quantities, and contributed to the development of analytic geometry.[12] Omar Khayym (10481131) found geometric solutions to cubic equations, and his extensive studies of the parallel postulate contributed to the development of non-Euclidian geometry.[13][unreliable source?] The theorems of Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen), Omar Khayyam and Nasir al-Din al-Tusi on quadrilaterals, including the Lambert quadrilateral and Saccheri quadrilateral, were the first theorems on elliptical geometry and hyperbolic geometry, and along with their alternative postulates, such as Playfair's axiom, these works had a considerable influence on the development of non-Euclidean geometry among later European geometers, including Witelo, Levi ben Gerson, Alfonso, John Wallis, and Giovanni Girolamo Saccheri.[14] In the early 17th century, there were two important developments in geometry. The first, and most important, was the creation of analytic geometry, or geometry with coordinates and equations, by Ren Descartes (15961650) and Pierre de Fermat (16011665). This was a necessary precursor to the development of calculus and a precise quantitative science of physics. The second geometric development of this period was the systematic study of projective geometry by Girard Desargues (15911661). Projective geometry is the study of geometry without measurement, just the study of how points align with each other. Two developments in geometry in the 19th century changed the way it had been studied previously. These were the discovery of non-Euclidean geometries by Lobachevsky, Bolyai and Gauss and of the formulation of symmetry as the central consideration in the Erlangen Programme of Felix Klein (which generalized the Euclidean and non Euclidean geometries). Two of the master geometers of the time were Bernhard Riemann, working primarily with tools from mathematical analysis, and introducing the Riemann surface, and Henri Poincar, the founder of algebraic topology and the geometric theory of dynamical systems. As a consequence of these major changes in the conception of geometry, the concept of "space" became something

rich and varied, and the natural background for theories as different as complex analysis and classical mechanics.

[edit] Contemporary geometry

[edit] Euclidean geometry

The 421polytope, orthogonally projected into the E8 Lie group Coxeter plane Euclidean geometry has become closely connected with computational geometry, computer graphics, convex geometry, discrete geometry, and some areas of combinatorics. Momentum was given to further work on Euclidean geometry and the Euclidean groups by crystallography and the work of H. S. M. Coxeter, and can be seen in theories of Coxeter groups and polytopes. Geometric group theory is an expanding area of the theory of more general discrete groups, drawing on geometric models and algebraic techniques.

[edit] Differential geometry

Differential geometry has been of increasing importance to mathematical physics due to Einstein's general relativity postulation that the universe is curved. Contemporary differential geometry is intrinsic, meaning that the spaces it considers are smooth manifolds whose geometric structure is governed by a Riemannian metric, which determines how distances are measured near each point, and not a priori parts of some ambient flat Euclidean space.

[edit] Topology and geometry

A thickening of the trefoil knot The field of topology, which saw massive development in the 20th century, is in a technical sense a type of transformation geometry, in which transformations are homeomorphisms. This has often been expressed in the form of the dictum 'topology is rubber-sheet geometry'. Contemporary geometric topology and differential topology, and particular subfields such as

Morse theory, would be counted by most mathematicians as part of geometry. Algebraic topology and general topology have gone their own ways.

[edit] Algebraic geometry

Quintic CalabiYau threefold The field of algebraic geometry is the modern incarnation of the Cartesian geometry of coordinates. From late 1950s through mid-1970s it had undergone major foundational development, largely due to work of Jean-Pierre Serre and Alexander Grothendieck. This led to the introduction of schemes and greater emphasis on topological methods, including various cohomology theories. One of seven Millennium Prize problems, the Hodge conjecture, is a question in algebraic geometry. The study of low dimensional algebraic varieties, algebraic curves, algebraic surfaces and algebraic varieties of dimension 3 ("algebraic threefolds"), has been far advanced. Grbner basis theory and real algebraic geometry are among more applied subfields of modern algebraic geometry. Arithmetic geometry is an active field combining algebraic geometry and number theory. Other directions of research involve moduli spaces and complex geometry. Algebrogeometric methods are commonly applied in string and brane theory.