Introduction and RRL
Introduction and RRL
It
examined how often students cheated, how they cheated, and why they cheated in Academics,
Academic dishonesty is a widespread problem Between Junior High and Senior High School.
Still, there is no single explanation for why it occurs, according to researchers at the University
of Michigan. They suggest that outside factors or pressures may serve as "neutralizers,"
allowing students to suppress their guilt and justify their dishonest acts to themselves. Most
students have engaged in plagiarism to a limited degree, and plagiarism activities are
associated with academically weaker, male students who have a negative attitude to their
studies. The factors contributing to plagiarism include lack of awareness, understanding, lack of
competence, and personal attitudes. Chapman and Lupton (2004) compared United States of
America and Hong Kong university business students to establish cheating behavior. The study
established that more than half of the US students and approximately a third of the Hong Kong
students reported cheating at some point during their university studies.
Background: The Philippine school system has faced significant changes and difficulties in the
years 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. Despite the development of technology that made distance
learning possible, many drawbacks were also mentioned, such as the validity of exam results.
Test results have also been questioned because evaluations were entirely completed at home
without the teacher's physical presence. Memes on social media raised concerns about the
validity of the test scores that pupils had given their teachers. If students could sometimes cheat
in front of their teachers during face-to-face classes, how honestly will they answer their tests
and assessments when they are not present? In actuality
Academic dishonesty or academic misconduct is any type of cheating that occurs in relation to a
formal academic exercise. Academic dishonesty has been documented in almost every type of
educational setting, from elementary school to graduate school, and has been met with
changeable degrees of respect throughout history. Today, an educated society tends to take a
very negative view of academic dishonesty.
The University of Newcastle defines academic dishonesty as comprising two major categories
academic, fraud and plagiarism. Academic fraud is making a false representation to gain an
unjust advantage. The presentation of the thoughts or works of another as one's own is
plagiarism. Some definitions include the objective of the person engaging in dishonest behavior
[Tibbetts (1998), (1999)].
Researchers have performed studies to find the motivations behind cheating and have pointed
out factors that influence this dishonest behavior. Works by all of these scholars have led to a
similar conclusion: that cheating is widespread on college campuses. Academic dishonesty, a
serious concern on most college campuses, cuts to the heart of the purpose of higher
education. The finished products of the university, its students, may not possess the
fundamental information and skills implied by the transcript. Academic dishonesty is an injury to
academically honest students as well as most college professors whose purpose is to teach
[Newstead, et al. (1996); Graham, et al. (1994)]. Student academic dishonesty includes, but is
not limited to, lying, cheating on exams, copying or using other people’s work without
permission, shifting or forging documents, buying papers, plagiarism, purposely not following
the rules, shifting research results, providing false excuses for missed tests and assignments,
making up sources, and so on [Arent (1991); Pratt and McLaughlin (1989)]. Alienation
(unfriendliness and separation) may cause students to engage in academic dishonesty [Eve
and Bromley (1981)]. Similarly, a small but statistically significant association between anomie
(i.e., lack of being tied to society and rules) and cheating was observed among business majors
at an Australian university [Caruana, et al. (2000)]. Cheating may also occur because of low
levels of commitment to the ideals of higher education and learning orientations (i.e., wanting to
learn versus earning a grade/degree) [Haines, et al. (1986); Whitley (1998)]. Finally, past
behavior tends to be the best predictor of future behavior, and this appears to be true for
academic dishonesty. It was observed that those who cheated in high school are more likely to
cheat at the college or university level [Whitley (1998)]. Additionally, cheating was sometimes
argued to be justified because the course is too hard or the instructor is unfair [Diekhoff, et al.
(1996)]. While there has been significant research on the subject of academic dishonesty, why
students cheat and what types of cheating they typically engage in and has not been fully
answered. “Little research appears to have been done to try and identify variables that have an
effect on academic dishonesty” [Caruana, et al. (2000)]. In order to effectively combat cheating,
it is necessary to understand how it is done, who does it, its forms, and why it is done. Factors
of Academic Dishonesty:
4. Cheating: Any attempt to give or obtain assistance in a formal academic exercise (like an
examination) without due acknowledgment.
5. Sabotage: Acting to prevent others from completing their work. This includes cutting pages
out of library books or willfully disrupting the experiments of others.
7. Electronic Cheating: using the cellphones for getting help during a test or quiz.
9. Free-Rider: free-riders were, in effect, cheating their group members when they failed to
contribute their fair share of work toward the project.
Today, an educated society tends to take a very negative view of academic dishonesty. It has
been reported that academic dishonesty is a prevalent problem that crosses all disciplines at the
university level. But, how prevalent is it at the University of Gujrat?
Academic dishonesty is prevalent in classrooms across the country. A plethora of evidence from
the literature exists to substantiate this bold claim. The explosion of online programs on college
campuses over the past decade without specific academic dishonesty prevention techniques
provides fertile ground to exacerbate the prevalence of academic dishonesty. In addition, the
availability of textbook solutions manuals and test banks available for purchase via the internet
further intensifies the academic integrity issue. Most recently, it was reported that students are
cheating with tiny listening devices that link to MP3 players or telephones (Moore 2017). Now is
the time, for all faculty members, administrators, and governing bodies to take the steps
necessary to preserve the academy by attacking academic dishonesty and producing graduates
with integrity. The purpose of this paper is to draw on the literature to provide a comprehensive
view of academic dishonesty within a framework in which to build an attack on academic
dishonesty and encourage dialogue about an epidemic that affects nearly all higher education
programs. Prior to the framework, a case for a frame
The purpose of this paper is to draw on the literature to provide a comprehensive view of
academic dishonesty within a framework in which to build an attack on academic dishonesty
and encourage dialogue about an epidemic that affects nearly all higher education programs.
Prior to the framework, a case for a framework and dialogue among academicians is made
This study examined a wide range of academic dishonesty behaviors (Lambert et al,
2003).
This study will analyze the causes of academic dishonesty in the high school setting and
proactive strategies that can help teachers reduce cheating (Satterlee, 2002).
The percentage of students who self-report regular or frequent cheating has significantly
increased in the past 50 years, particularly in relation to test-related cheating (Bertram Gallant
2020; McCabe et al. 2012; Parnther 2020).