Although this is a rather dated paper, it provides a straightforward and

useful introduction to some of the key theories and theorists of

reflection.

Richard Hawkins & Harvey Woolf

Greater Manchester AHP/HCS Life Long Learning Project Team HANDOUT

3
Frameworks for Reflection

Introduction
Having established the need for experiential knowledge that arises out of reflection,
this handout is exploring some of the models structures and frameworks that can
facilitate the reflective process.

However, before we explore these frameworks some important distinctions are

needed to be made about different types of reflection.

Edgar Schon, an influential writer on reflection, described reflection in two main

ways: reflection in action and reflection on action. Reflection on action is looking
back after the event whilst reflection in action is happening during the event. To
complicate matters there are different interpretations of reflection on action. Let’s
now explore these terms.

Reflection in action means

“To think about what one is doing whilst one is doing it; it is typically stimulated
by surprise, by something which puzzled the practitioner concerned”(Greenwood,
1993).

Reflection in action allows the practitioner to redesign what he/ she is doing whilst
he/she is doing it. This is commonly associated with experienced practitioners.
However, it is much neglected.

Reflection on action is defined as:

“The retrospective contemplation of practice undertaken in order to uncover the

knowledge used in practical situations, by analysing and interpreting the
information recalled” (Fitzgerald, 1994pp67)

We can see here that reflection on action involves turning information into
knowledge, by conducting a cognitive post mortem.

Alternatively Boyd & Fales suggest reflection on action is:

 “The process of creating and clarifying the meanings of experiences in terms of
self in relation to both self and world. The outcome of this process is changed
conceptual perspectives” (Boyd & Fales, 1983pp101)

We see here that Boyd and Fales focus more on self development. Here refection
does not only add to our knowledge but challenges the concepts and theories we
hold. Furthermore as a result we don’t see more, we see differently.

Atkins and Murphy (1994) take this idea one step further and suggest that for
reflection to make a real difference to practice we follow this with a commitment to
action as a result.

The problems with these views of reflection on action are that they do not take
account of the importance of reflection before action.
This is when we plan out before we act what we want to do.
So what have we learnt about reflection? It can best be seen as:

Reflection before action

Reflection in action
Reflection after action.

Now lets see which frameworks best support these approaches.

 Gibbs Framework for Reflection (Linked with the core skills of reflection)

Stage 1: Description of the event

Describe in detail the event you are reflecting on.

Include e.g. where were you; who else was there; why were you there; what were
you doing; what were other people doing; what was the context of the event; what
happened; what was your part in this; what parts did the other people play; what
was the result.

Stage 2: Feelings and Thoughts (Self awareness)

At this stage, try to recall and explore those things that were going on inside your
head. Include:

• How you were feeling when the event started?

• What you were thinking about at the time?
• How did it make you feel?
• How did other people make you feel?
• How did you feel about the outcome of the event?
• What do you think about it now?

Stage 3: Evaluation

Try to evaluate or make a judgement about what has happened. Consider what was
good about the experience and what was bad about the experience or what did or
didn’t go so well

Stage 4: Analysis

Break the event down into its component parts so they can be explored separately.
You may need to ask more detailed questions about the answers to the last stage.
Include:

• What went well?

• What did you do well?
• What did others do well?
• What went wrong or did not turn out how it should have done?
• In what way did you or others contribute to this?

Stage 5: Conclusion (Synthesis)

This differs from the evaluation stage in that now you have explored the issue from
different angles and have a lot of information to base your judgement. It is here that
you are likely to develop insight into you own and other people’s behaviour in terms
of how they contributed to the outcome of the event. Remember the purpose of
reflection is to learn from an experience. Without detailed analysis and honest
exploration that occurs during all the previous stages, it is unlikely that all aspects of
the event will be taken into account and therefore valuable opportunities for learning
can be missed. During this stage you should ask yourself what you could have done
differently.

Stage 6: Action Plan

During this stage you should think yourself forward into encountering the event
again and to plan what you would do – would you act differently or would you be
likely to do the same?
Here the cycle is tentatively completed and suggests that should the event occur
again it will be the focus of another reflective cycle

Gibbs model incorporates all the core skills of reflection. Arguably it is focused on
reflection on action, but with practice it could be used to focus on reflection in and
before action.

Bortons` (1970) Framework Guiding Reflective Activities

What? So What? Now what?

This is the description This is the level of This is the level of

and self awareness level analysis and evaluation synthesis. Here we build
and all questions start when we look deeper at on the previous levels
with the word what what was behind the these questions to
experience. enable us to consider
alternative courses of
action and choose what
we are going to do next.
Examples Examples Examples
What happened? So what is the Now what could I do?
What did I do? importance of this? Now what do I need to
What did other do? So what more do I need do?
What was I trying to to know about this? Now what might I do?
achieve? So what have I learnt Now what might be the
What was good or bad about this consequences of this
about the experiences action?

Bortons model incorporates all the core skills of reflection. Arguably it is focused on
reflection on action, but with practice it could be used to focus on reflection in and
before action.

Johns Model of Structured Refection

Chris John’s (1994; 1995) model arose from his work in the Burford Nursing
Development Unit in the early 1990’s. He envisaged this model as being used within
a process of guided reflection. His focus was about uncovering and making explicit
the knowledge that we use in our practice. He adopted some earlier work by Carper
(1978) who looked at ways of knowing in nursing.

Ways of knowing Cues

Aesthetics – the What was I trying to achieve?
art of what we Why did I respond as I did?
do, our own What were the consequences of that for the patient?
experiences Others? Myself?
How was this person (people) feeling?
How did I Know this?

Personal – self How did I feel in this situation?

awareness What internal factors were influencing me?

Ethics – moral How did my actions match my beliefs?

knowledge What factors made me act in an incongruent way?

Empirics – What knowledge did or should have informed me?

scientific

The framework uses five cue questions which are then divided into more focuses to
promote detailed reflection.

Cue Questions

1. Description of the experience

Phenomenon – describe the here and now experience
Casual – what essential factors contributed to this experience?
Context - what are the significant background factors to this experience?
Clarifying – what are the key processes for reflection in this experience?

2. Reflection
What was I trying to achieve?
Why did I intervene as I did?
What were the consequences of my actions for:
o Myself?
o The patient / family?
o The people I work with?
How did I feel about this experience when it was happening?
 How did the patient feel about it?
How do I know how the patient felt about it?

3. Influencing factors
What internal factors influenced my decision – making?
What external factors influenced my decision – making?
What sources of knowledge did / should have influenced my decision –
making?

4. Evaluation: Could I have dealt with the situation better?

What other choices did I have?
What would be the consequences of these choices?

5. Learning
How do I now feel about this experience?
How have I made sense of this experience in light of past experiences and
future practice?
How has this experience changed my ways of knowing
o Empirics – scientific
o Ethics – moral knowledge
o Personal – self awareness
o Aesthetics – the art of what we do, our own experiences
 Smyth’s Framework for Reflection on Action

Activity Cues
Describe What did I do?

Inform (Analysis) What does this mean?

Confront (Self How did I come to be like this?

awareness)
Reconstruct (Evaluation What do my practices say about my assumptions,
and Synthesis) values and beliefs?

Where did these ideas come from?

What social practices are expressed in these

ideas?

What is it that causes me to maintain my theories

What views of power do they embody?

Whose interests seem to be served by my

practices?

What is it that acts to constrain my views of what

is possible in my practice?
We can see with a number of models they go through, some, or all of the following
phases.

Descriptive phase Reflective phase Emancipator

phase

Processes Description of practice Reflective Critique of

events analysis against practice
espoused regarding
theories conflicts
distortions and
inconsistencies
Examination of Reflective Engagement in
descriptions for analysis of emancipatory &
genuiness and the situations change process
comprehensiveness
Reflective
analysis of
intentions
Products Descriptive Knowledge Learning and
accounts/narrative about practice change in
processes and practice
applications
Self awareness Self critique and
emancipation

Phases in critical reflective inquiry Kim 1999

 References

Atkins, S & Murphy, K (1994) Reflective Practice Nursing Standard 8 (39) pp49-54

Borton, T (1970) Reach, Teach and Touch. Mc Graw Hill, London.

Boud D, Keogh R & Walker D (1985): Promoting reflection in learning: A model. IN

Reflection: Turing Experience into Learning (Eds: Boud D, Keogh R & Walker D).
Kogan Page, London.

Boyd E & Fales A (1983): Reflective Learning: the key to learning from experience.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology 23 (2) pp99-117

Carper B (1978) Fundamental ways of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing

Science 1 (1) pp13-23

Gibbs G (1988) Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods.

Oxford Further Education Unit, Oxford.

Fitzgerald M (1994): Theories of Reflection for learning IN Reflective Practice in

nursing, A Palmer and S Burns (eds). Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.

Kim HS (1999): Critical Reflective inquiry for Knowledge Development of nursing

practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing 29 (5) 1205-12

Greenwood J (1993): Reflective practice a critique of the work of

Argyris & Schon. Journal of Advanced Nursing 19 1183-1187

Johns C (1995) Framing learning through reflection within Carper’s fundamental

ways of knowing in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 22 226-234

Schon DA (1983): The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, New York.

Smyth J (1989): Developing and sustaining critical reflection in teacher education.

Journal of Teacher Education 40(2) 2-9

Cached at
http://www.communityhealthcarebolton.co.uk/SHA/LLL/resources/reflective/Framew
ork%20for%20Reflection.doc

Although we have made every effort to trace the authors of this document to name
them, we have been unable to find them. If the authors contact us with their details,
we will be very happy to add an acknowledgement to this page.