Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 45 views

    Bucket Elevator

    Uploaded by

    MAHENDRA
    The bucket elevator at the Scoop Bath site was inspected. It was erected on only 6 of the intended 12 foundation bolts due to interference from the adjacent vertical structure. Erecting such a heavy structure on only half the intended bolts presents safety risks. The design department of the vendor is requested to resolve the issue. The painting on the bucket elevator was also found to be rusted. The customer is requested to acknowledge or comment on the observations within 48 hours.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Bucket Elevator

    Uploaded by

    MAHENDRA
    45 views2 pages
    The bucket elevator at the Scoop Bath site was inspected. It was erected on only 6 of the intended 12 foundation bolts due to interference from the adjacent vertical structure. Erecting such a heavy structure on only half the intended bolts presents safety risks. The design department of the vendor is requested to resolve the issue. The painting on the bucket elevator was also found to be rusted. The customer is requested to acknowledge or comment on the observations within 48 hours.

    Original Description:

    M

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The bucket elevator at the Scoop Bath site was inspected. It was erected on only 6 of the intended 12 foundation bolts due to interference from the adjacent vertical structure. Erecting such a heavy structure on only half the intended bolts presents safety risks. The design department of the vendor is requested to resolve the issue. The painting on the bucket elevator was also found to be rusted. The customer is requested to acknowledge or comment on the observations within 48 hours.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    45 views2 pages

    Bucket Elevator

    Uploaded by

    MAHENDRA
    The bucket elevator at the Scoop Bath site was inspected. It was erected on only 6 of the intended 12 foundation bolts due to interference from the adjacent vertical structure. Erecting such a heavy structure on only half the intended bolts presents safety risks. The design department of the vendor is requested to resolve the issue. The painting on the bucket elevator was also found to be rusted. The customer is requested to acknowledge or comment on the observations within 48 hours.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    FIELD INSPECTION REPORT No: VAL/SGS/MECH/BS/No.

    92

    Industry Division File No: IN/KOL/IND/201400172 Date: 05-11-2020

    Projec:Scoop bath site. Client: M/s. VEDANTA, JHARSUGUDA


    Supply intended for: Service Order No/PO No: Dated: 5600001417 Date.05.04.2019
    Inspection ordered by: Placed with: SGS INDIA PVT.LTD.
    Vedanta(Verbally)
    Drawing No: Available

    Name of work: Bucket elevator. QAP NO: Available.

    Details of inspection carried out at site: The items marked offered for inspection at erection site and the offered items
    checked randomly on visually accessible areas. Vendor: M/s.Wevin.
    Completion
    Comments Action By
    Date
    SL.No

    1.

    M/s.Wevin
    Immediate

    SCOOP BATH – Observation-Pre-Fabricated Bucket Elevator:


    The bucket elevator is supposed to be erected on12 no’s foundation
    bolts along with the nuts & washer fixed with it. But as per present
    condition it had been erected on 6 no. foundation bolts along with
    nuts& washer fixed with it only because among 12 no foundation
    bolts at its base frame/plate 6 no bolts are fouling with the adjacent
    vertical portion of the bucket elevator. The gap between those 6
    bolts & edge of the vertical structure is not enough for fixing nut
    along with the washer at those 6 positions. Now since the structure
    of the bucket elevator is heavy so it is very much risky from safety
    point of view to erect such heavy structure on 6 bolts instead of 12.
    In this situation, we need the advice of the design department of
    M/s.Wevin to resolve this issue ASAP. The painting of the bucket
    elevator is found rusted also.
    NOTE: We request the customer to respond/comment upon the doubt/dissatisfaction (if any) vis-à-vis above written observation(s) on or before 48 hours of its issuance, Alternatively, the report will be considered as “acknowledged”.

    Severity Level- Major

    Disclaimer:

    This inspection has been carried out to the best of our knowledge & our responsibility is limited to the exercise of reasonable care. This Report reflects our findings at the time & place of inspection and is not intended to relieve the
    seller from their contractual obligations. “In accordance with Client’s instructions, the Company’s involvement has been limited to witnessing/observing a third party’s intervention(s) at the third party’s laboratory/test house or other
    facilities and installations used for the intervention(s). The Company’s sole responsibility was to be present at the time of the third party’s intervention(s) to forward the results, or confirm the occurrence, of the intervention(s). The
    Company is not responsible for the condition or calibration of apparatus, instruments and measuring devices used, the analysis methods applied the qualifications, actions or omissions of the third party’s personnel or the analysis results.
    This document is issued by the Company under its General Conditions of Service accessible at http://www.sgsgroup.in/en-GB/Terms-and-Conditions.aspx . Attention is drawn to the limitation of liability, indemnification and
    jurisdiction issues defined therein. Any holder of this document is advised that information contained hereon reflects the company’s findings at the time of it’s intervention only and within the limits of client’s instructions, if any. The
    company’s sole responsibility is to its client and this document(s) does not exonerate parties to a transaction from exercising all their rights and obligations under the transaction document. Any unauthorized alteration, forgery or
    falsification of the content or appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.” “The information stated in the Report is derived from the results of inspection or testing
    procedures carried out in accordance with the instruction of our clients and / or our assessment of such results on the basis of any technical standards, trade custom or practice, or other circumstances which should in our professional
    opinion be taken into account”

    BAPI SEN
    05.11.2020
    Client’s Signature & Date Inspector’s Sign & Date

    You might also like