New Buddhism
New Buddhism
New Buddhism
Contents
1Origins
2Doctrines and concepts
o 2.1Core beliefs
o 2.2Buddhism's place within modernism and science
o 2.3Buddhist karma and its misrepresentation by Hindus
o 2.4Ambedkar's 22 vows
3Commencement
4Scripture and practice
5Reception
6Status in India
7Festivals
8See also
9Footnotes
10References
11Further reading
12External links
Origins[edit]
Buddhist flag of Navayana Buddhists
Ambedkar was an Indian leader influential during the colonial era and the early post-independence period of India. He was
the fourteenth child in an impoverished Maharashtra Schedule caste family, who studied abroad, returned to India in the
1920s and joined the political movement. His focus was social and political rights for the Depressed class community.[17] To
free his community from religious prejudice, he concluded that they must leave Hinduism and convert to a different religion.
He chose Buddhism in the form of Navayana.[17][11]
Core beliefs[edit]
In his unpublished editorial of the founding text of the Navayana, Ambedkar writes:
To disarm all criticism I would like to make it clear that I claim no originality for the book. It is a compilation and assembly
plant. The material has been gathered from various books. I would particularly like to mention Ashvaghosha's Buddhavita,
whose poetry no one can excel. In the narrative of certain events I have even borrowed his language.[19]
He goes on further to say that his doctrine simplifies the teachings of Buddhism and clear up the various misconceptions
and possible points of confusion people may have about the faith. He explains
The only originality that I can claim in is the order of presentation of the topics, in which I have tried to introduce simplicity
and clarity. There are certain matters which give headaches to the student of Buddhism.[19]
In addition, he states, that Buddhism is one of the few religions that do not claim their values are derived from a god, and are
therefore innately flexible and capable of withstanding Modernism. Ambedkar writes in the same essay:
[T]he Buddha claimed no such infallibility for what he taught. In the Mahaparinibbana Sutta he told Ananda that his religion
was based on reason and experience and that his followers should not accept his teaching as correct and binding merely
because they emanated from him. Being based on reason and experience they were free to modify or even to abandon any
of his teachings, if it was found that at a given time and in given circumstances they do not apply.[20]