Experiment 7 - 3D
Experiment 7 - 3D
GROUP 3D
Page | 1
TABLE OF CONTENT
Page | 2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Diffusion is a mass transfer phenomenon that happens when a component migrates within
the same phase or between phases as a result of the concentration difference between two points.
When a fluid has two or more components and there is a concentration gradient within the fluid,
one of the components will often flow in a certain direction to lessen the concentration gradient.
This process occurs in either the liquid or gas phases, or both at once. One common illustration of
diffusion occurs when liquid in an open water container evaporates into the air due to the disparity
in water vapour concentration between the surface of the water and the surrounding air.
There are two categories of diffusion which are diffusion in a uniform gradient of
concentration and diffusion in a non-uniform concentration. According to Fick's first law, which
states that diffusivity is dependent on concentration, diffusion occurs in a uniform concentration
gradient. As contrast to this, the diffusion in a gradient of non-uniform concentration follows Fick's
second law, where the diffusivity is unaffected by concentration.
In this experiment, the main aim is to study the diffusivity of vapor of a volatile liquid is
studied. The gas diffusivity coefficient of the volatile liquid is determined by using Stefan-
Winklemann’s method. This method, which is frequently used to determine a volatile liquid's
diffusivity, considers the volatile liquid's rate of evaporation, which is then followed by the rate of
descent of the liquid surface in a glass tube or diffusion cell (Coca et al., 1980). A liquid was kept
at a constant temperature inside a tube with a limited diameter and was circulated through the top
of the tube using air. All of this is done to make sure that the vapour partial pressure is transferred
from the surface of the liquid to the air.
Page | 3
2.0 OBJECTIVES
1. To determine the gas diffusion coefficient of acetone using the established Winkelmann’s
method.
2. To determine the diffusivity of the vapor of a volatile liquid which is acetone
Page | 4
3.0 METHODOLOGY
Start-up Procedure
1. The water bath was filled with clean water to approximately 15 mm from the top.
Figure 3.1: Clean water was filled into the water bath for about 15 mm from the top
2. The mains cable was plugged to the electrical supply. The voltage of the supply was ensured
to be correct to suit the equipment.
3. The main power on the control panel was switched on.
4. The set-point value on the temperature controller was adjusted to 55°C.
5. The heater was switched on. The water temperature was observed until it heated up to 55°C
and remained constant.
6. The air pump was switched on. The needle valve was adjusted so that a steady low velocity
of air stream would be detected at the end of flexible tubing.
7. The equipment was now ready for the experiment.
Page | 5
Figure 3.2: Start-Up Procedure
Page | 6
Experiment Procedure: Determination of the gas diffusion coefficient of acetone using the
established Winkelmann’s method.
Page | 7
4.0 RESULTS
0.01600
0.01400
y = -0.0004x + 0.0153
R² = 0.7813
0.01200
t/ L0-L (ks/mm)
0.01000
0.00800
0.00600
0.00400
0.00200
0.00000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Liquid Fall, L0-L (mm)
Page | 8
The constant temperature of the experiment = 55 °C
From the Figure 4.2, the gradient obtains is −0.0004 ks/𝑚𝑚2 which is the value for the s.
𝜌 𝐶
𝐿
𝑠 = (2𝑀𝐷 ) (𝐶 𝐵𝑀 ) = −0.0004 ks/𝑚𝑚2 = −4 × 105 s/𝑚2
𝐶
𝐴 𝑇
Page | 9
Next, logarithmic mean molecular concentration of vapor, CBm (kmol/m3)
𝑃𝑎𝑡𝑚 − 𝑃𝑉
𝐶 𝐵2 = ( ) 𝐶𝑇
𝑃𝑎𝑡𝑚
101.325 − 97.2487
𝐶 𝐵2 = ( ) (0.03716)
101.325
𝐶 𝐵2 = 0.001495 𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 / 𝑚3
𝐶𝐵1 − 𝐶𝐵2
𝐶𝐵𝑀 =
𝐶
ln (𝐶𝐵1 )
𝐵2
0.03716 − 0.001495
𝐶𝐵𝑀 =
0.03716
ln ( )
0.001495
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 0.01110 𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 / 𝑚3
= −1.416 × 10−4 𝑚2 /𝑠
𝑚2
According to the Youney et al. (2017): 𝐷𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 = 1.215 𝑥 10−5 𝑠
Page | 10
|𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 − 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙|
𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = × 100%
𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙
(−1.416𝑥 10−4 ) − (1.215 𝑥 10−5 )
=
(1.215 𝑥 10−5
= 1265.4321%
Page | 11
5.0 DISCUSSION
Due to the difference of the partial pressure of the acetone between both regions, acetone
liquid evaporated and travelled to the end of the capillary by the mechanism of diffusion. This
phenomenon can be explained by the random molecular movement of acetone down the
concentration gradient (Atkins, de Paula, & Keeler, 2018). Since a large volume of air is passing
by the end of capillary tube, the concentration of acetone at that point was assumed to be negligible.
Besides, the boundary at the liquid surface is impermeable to air as air is insoluble in acetone
liquid. Hence, air cannot diffuse into or away from the liquid surface. This was a case of the
diffusion of acetone through stagnant or non-diffusing air (Geankoplis, Hersel, & Lepek, 2018).
Throughout the experiment, the height of the acetone level in the capillary tube was
measured using ruler for every 15 minutes interval. All data was then tabulated in Table 4.1 to
determine the falling rate of the liquid level in the capillary tube over time, which was used as an
indicator of the evaporation rate of acetone or the diffusion rate of acetone through the air. By
plotting t/(L0 – L) against (L0 – L), a graph with a slope, s of −0.0004 ks/𝑚𝑚2 , as illustrated in
Figure 4.1, was obtained for diffusion coefficient calculation. It was determined that the gas
diffusion coefficient or diffusivity of acetone in air was determined to be −1.416 × 10−4 𝑚2 /𝑠.
To determine the validity of the result, the experimental value of diffusivity was compared
with the theoretical value, 1.215 × 10−5 𝑚2 /𝑠 that was predicted from Modified Maxwell’s
equation by Gililand (Youney et al.,2017). It was found that the percentage error of experimental
result was 1265.4321% which is considered high. The deviation might be due to the certain errors
made during conducting the experiment.
Page | 12
Errors and Modifications
It is believed that some errors had taken place during the experiment as there is some
deviation between the experimental value and the theoretical value. There are two types of errors
that commonly occur in experiments which are random errors and systematic errors. Random
errors cause readings to differ from one another, affecting measurement precision. Hence, the
results may fluctuate slightly from the precise reading. The source of this inaccuracy could be that
the observer's eyes are not aligned with conventional ruler when measure the acetone level in the
capillary tube. To prevent inaccuracy in measurements caused by this error, the observer should
use a cathetometer to measure the falling rate of the acetone level instead of ruler. According to
Hasan (2022), a cathetometer is a device that can accurately and precisely measure minute
variations in the levels of liquid surface such as the distance between the levels of acetone in the
capillary tube. On top of that, to prevent random error or particularly called as parallax error, the
observer can take several measurements to obtain average value. By taking the average reading, it
will minimize the chances of error.
Besides, other possible errors that might happen include air bubbles that escaped into the
capillary tube when filling up the acetone. Hence, when filling the capillary tube with acetone, no
air bubble should be allowed to escape into the capillary tube in order to minimize the error that
might affect the accuracy of data collected. Other than that, during the experiment, it was found
that the cartridge heater fractured and covered in deposits of mineral. This will lead to an uneven
distribution of heat in the water bath and prevented the acetone from diffusing at a set temperature.
Therefore, in order to collect the data with high accuracy, a new cartridge heater should be installed
before conducting the experiment. Lastly, other possible errors that might occur is when the
acetone-filled capillary tube was frequently taken out in order to measure the height or level of
acetone filled (L) for every 15 minutes. As a result, the acetone will immediately be exposed to
the surrounding temperature, which could affect the rate of diffusion. To acquire accurate results,
it is necessary to limit the action of repeatedly removing the capillary tube using the appropriate
measuring equipment. At the end of experiment, this can reduce the error and provide a result with
more accurate data.
Page | 13
6.0 CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the experiment was done to determine the gaseous diffusion coefficient of
air-acetone mixture at the condition of atmospheric pressure and 55 °C (328 K) by the Winkelmann
evaporation tube method. This method, which is frequently used to determine a volatile liquid's
diffusivity, considers the volatile liquid's rate of evaporation, which is then followed by the rate of
descent of the liquid surface in a glass tube or diffusion cell (Coca et al., 1980). From this
experiment, the team members were able to apply the knowledge that has been learned in the Mass
Transfer Principles chapter of the Separation Process I course. Throughout the experiment, the
height of the acetone level in the capillary tube was measured using ruler for every 15 minutes
interval. Based on the findings, the gas diffusion coefficient or diffusivity of acetone in air using
Winkelmann method showed a large deviation from theoretical value, with a 1265.4321% percent
error. This deviation might be due to the certain errors made during conducting the experiment.
For example, parallax error can occur when determining the acetone level in the capillary tube.
Therefore, some precaution measures should be taken into consideration when conducting the
experiment in order to minimize the chances of error. To avoid parallax error, several
measurements should be taken to obtain the average value and use a cathetometer to measure the
falling rate of the acetone level instead of a ruler. To conclude, Winkelmann method is a reliable
approach to determine the gaseous diffusion coefficient of air-acetone mixture.
In short, all objectives of this experiment are successfully achieved and the theories in this
experiment have been proven appropriately.
Page | 14
7.0 REFERENCES
Atkins, P., de Paula, J., & Keeler, J. (2018). Physical Chemistry (11th ed.). Oxford University
Press.
Coca, J., Bueno, J. L., & Alvarez, R. (1980). Gaseous Diffusion Coefficients by the Stefan-
Winkelmann Method Using a Polymer-Solvent Mixture as Evaporation Source. Industrial
& Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 19(2), 219–221.
https://doi.org/10.1021/i160074a016
Geankoplis, C. J., Hersel, A. A., & Lepek, D. H. (2018). Transport Processes and Separation
Process Principles (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Hasan, M. M. (2022, January 1). What is a Cathetometer? How does it Works? Engineers Dream.
https://www.engineers-dream.com/2022/01/what-is-cathetometer.html
Huey, J. (2017, March 30). Vapour diffusion coefficient of acetone in air KEK 150085 sin jia huey.
Academia.edu. Retrieved July 10, 2022, from
https://www.academia.edu/32148628/Vapour_Diffusion_Coefficient_of_Acetone_in_Air_
KEK_150085_Sin_Jia_Huey
Youney, M. Y., Al-haji, H., Mohammad Al-Bajhan, Ahmed Al-Saif, & Al-Abdulaziz, A. (n.d.).
ISSN: 2000-000X vol. 1 issue 10, December 2017, pages: 9-12 integration ... Integration a
Design of Experiment in the Mass Transfer Laboratory to Investigate the Effect of
Temperature Change on Diffusion Coefficient of Acetone in Air. Retrieved December 10,
2017, from http://ijeais.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/IJEAIS171202.pdf
Page | 15