Module 7,8,9 Fair Compensation
Module 7,8,9 Fair Compensation
Module 7,8,9 Fair Compensation
CASE LAW
The Supreme Court in State of Bombay Vs. R.S. Narji has held that in each case all the
facts and circumstances will require to be closely examined in order to determine whether a
public purpose has been established. Public purpose is not capable of precise definition. Each
case has to be considered in the light of the purpose for which acquisition is sought for. It is
to serve the general interest of the community as opposed to the particular interest of the
individual. Public purpose broadly speaking would include the purpose in which the general
interest of the society as opposed to the particular interest of the individual is directly and
vitally concerned. Generally, the executive would be the best judge to determine whether or
not the impugned purpose is a public purpose. Yet it is not beyond the purview of judicial
scrutiny. The interest of a section of the society maybe public purpose when it is benefited by
the acquisition. The acquisition in question must indicate that it was towards the welfare of
the people and not to benefit a private individual or group of individuals joined collectively.
Therefore, acquisition for anything which is not for a public purpose cannot be done
compulsorily - Manimegalai Vs. The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition Officer) Adi
Dravidar Welfare
In Somawanti Vs. State of Punjab the Supreme Court has an occasion to consider the true
import of expression "public purpose" in the context of the provisions of the Land
Acquisition Act. After main a reference to the definition clause where the expression "public
purpose" is defined, the Supreme Court observed as under: “This is an inclusive definition
and not a compendious one and therefore, does not assist us very much in ascertaining the
ambit us very much in ascertaining the ambit of the expression 'public purpose'. Broadly
speaking the expression' public purpose' would, however, include a purpose in which the
general interest of the community, as opposed to the particular interest of individuals, is
directly and vitally concerned.” “Hence the expression "public purpose" would include
purpose in which the general interest of the community as opposed to the particular interest
of the individual is directly or vitally concerned. Whatever furthers the general interest of the
community as opposed to the particular interest of the individual must be regarded as public
purpose. Thus scope of the expression is obviously not static and must change with varying
concept, time, state of society and its needs. Therefore, the proper approach is to consider the
scheme as a whole and then examine whether the entire scheme of acquisition is for a public
purpose of not. It will be an entirely wrong approach to pick up a stray item or clause out of
the scheme and then say that the said clause is not actuated by public purpose. The phrase
"public purpose" will have to be construed according to the spirit of the times and the needs
of the society. The question will have to be decided in each case on the touchstone as to
whether the acquisition is in the interest of community or section of society as distinguished
from private interest of an individual.”
PROCESS FLOW OF SIA
DETERMINATION OF SOCIAL IMPACT AND PUBLIC PURPOSE
A- Preliminary investigation for determination of Social Impact and Public Purpose-
Preparation of Social Impact Assessment Study U/s 4
Government to consult with Municipality, Panchayat, etc in the affected area and carry
out a SIA study Notification to this effect to be made available in local language to the
concerned offices i.e. District Collector, Sub Collector, Tehsil, Municipality, Panchayat
etc.
Study to be completed in six months, team to include adequate representation from panchayat
or municipality i.e. elected representatives of the people
Various parameters to be studied.
The authority conducting the study to prepare a Social Impact Management Plan (SIMP) ,
listing ameliorative measures required to be undertaken for addressing specific components
(these should not be less than other contemporary schemes/plans operational in that area.
Public hearing for Social Impact Assessment U/s 5
Appropriate government to notify, with due time and publicity, for a public hearing to be
conducted in that area, to ascertain views of the affected families to be recorded and included
in the Social Impact Assessment Report
Social Impact Assessment Report U/s 6
Appropriate government to ensure that SIA study report and SIMP are made available in the
local language to the relevant offices and published in the affected areas (locality) and
website of the government in prescribed manner if environmental impact assessment is being
carried out, then a report of the SIA shall be made available to the agency carrying out the
same. (Irrigation projects-Only EIA hence no SIA)
B. Appraisal of Social Impact Assessment report by an Expert Group
Appropriate government to ensure that the SIA report is evaluated by an independent
multidisciplinary expert group U/s 7(1), which maybe constituted as follows-
These above-mentioned recommendations to be made available in the local language to the
panchayat/municipality/municipal corporation and all other relevant government offices as
need be.
Examination of proposals for land acquisition and the Social Impact Assessment Report
by appropriate government
The appropriate government shall ensure that-
1. There is a legitimate and bona fide public purpose for the proposed acquisition which
necessitates the acquisition of the land identified
2. The potential benefits and the public purpose referred to shall outweigh the costs and
adverse social impact as determined by the Social Impact Assessment study carried out
3. Only the bare minimum area of land required for the project is proposed to be acquired
4. There is no unutilized and which has been previously acquired in the area
5. The land, if any, acquired earlier remained unutilized, is used for such public purpose and
make recommendations in respect thereof.
Stage 3: Notification and acquisition
• The government would put in place a preliminary notification in which it would
publish the details of the land acquired. This notification will be made accessible in
local area via various media.
• Once the notification is out, no person of the affected area can sell any land or make
any other land related transactions.
• A draft Rehabilitation and Resettlement scheme is prepared by the Commissioner of
the Rehabilitation and Resettlement.
Stage 4: Rehabilitation and Resettlement Awards
• After the land acquisition is over, the collector shall pass Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Awards for each affected family.
This award will comprise:
• Amount payable to a family
• Bank account number of the person to whom the amount is tranferred
• Particulars of the house site and house to be alloted in case of displacement
• Particulars of land allotted to the displaced families
• Particulars of one time subsistence allowance and transportation allowance in case of
displaced families
• Other such payments and allowances as per the act
RELEVANCE OF SIA
SIA is the only mechanism today to address the impacts of acquisition on livelihoods of all
those who don’t own land but are still dependant on it. It is a prerequisite to formulate
inclusive rehabilitation packages. Together SIA and the public hearing at gram sabhas are
two facets of this act for ensuring a fair “right” to compensation and right to rehabilitation.
THE NEED FOR SIA
First, internationally, there is increased recognition for conducting SIA as a methodology to
review the social impacts of infrastructure and other development interventions. According to
the International Association for Impact Assessment, “Social impact assessment includes the
processes of analysing, monitoring and managing the intended and unintended social
consequences, both positive and negative, of planned interventions (policies, programs, plans,
projects) and any social change processes invoked by those interventions. Its primary purpose
is to bring about a more sustainable and equitable biophysical and human environment.” SIA
originated in the 1970s as a regulatory oversight mechanism, but increasingly, social impact
assessment is being seen not as a regulatory hurdle but an important way of assessing
business risk. SIA is often carried out as part of, or in addition to, environmental impact
assessment. Secondly, even within India, there is growing recognition of the need for SIA
and the existence of policy precedents for the same. Since 2006, some aspects of the SIA as
outlined in the LARR Act were being conducted as part of the environment impact
assessment carried out pursuant to the EIA notification, 2006. Resettlement policies have
lately made social impact assessment a major part of the resettlement planning process. For
instance, in 2006, a provision was included for conducting SIA in the Orissa Rehabilitation
and Resettlement Policy. The National Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy, 2007 has
made a provision for conducting SIA whenever a new project or expansion of an existing
project is undertaken. But this provision is limited only to those cases, which involve
displacement of 400 hundred or more families, en masse in plain areas, or two hundred or
more families en masse in tribal or hilly areas. The LARR Act, further mandates that the
body conducting the SIA should prepare a Social Impact Management Plan, which outlines
how this impact should be countered and addressed. Such a study is important for projects to
be designed efficiently and equitably, and for them to be taken to completion without
opposition from the affected families. Therefore, doing away with SIA completely for the
vast majority of acquisitions may be politically expedient, but not ultimately desirable for
ensuring sustainable, equitable and unopposed development. This is because unless the
people displaced are stakeholders in the development process, they will not co-opt into the
development process and allow it to proceed. After all stalled infrastructural and industrial
activities benefit no one.
HEARING OF OBJECTIONS
Sec.15 of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 envisages hearing of objections of any person who is
interested in any land which has been notified for acquisition.
The Section provides that within 60 days from the date of notification if any person who
is interested in any land which has been notified as being required for any public
purpose is at liberty to raise objections as to:
a) the area and suitability of land proposed to be acquired;
b) justification offered for public purpose;
c) the findings of the SIA
Such objections should be made to the Collector in writing and the Collector is bound to give
a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the person raising such objections or any person
authorised by him in this behalf or his Advocate.
After hearing all such objections and after making such further inquiry the Collector should
make a report in respect of the land which has been notified and send it to the appropriate
Govt. along with his recommendations on the objections so raised and the record of the
proceedings held by him along with a separate report giving therein the approximate cost of
land acquisition, particulars as to the number of affected families likely to be resettled for the
decision of the Govt. The decision of the appropriate Govt. on the objections will be final.
In Navneet Ram Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, it was held by the Supreme Court that where
the land proposed to be acquired is specifically mentioned in the notification it is only the
persons interested in that land who is entitled to be heard under Sec.5-A. Thus a person
having no right, title and interest in the land sought to be acquired has no locus standi to file
an objection and question the validity of the acquisition of the land.
MODULE 8
Rehabilitation & Resettlement Award
Rehabilitation and Resettlement award for affected families by Collector
Sec.31 empowers the Collector to pass Rehabilitation and Resettlement Award for each
family affected by the land acquisition in terms of the entitlements provided in the second
schedule.
Such Rehabilitation and Resettlement award should include the following:
a) rehabilitation and resettlement amount payable to the family;
b) bank account number of the person to which the rehabilitation and resettlement
award amount is to be transferred;
c) particulars of house site and house to be allotted, in case of displaced families;
d) particulars of land allotted to the displaced families;
e) particulars of one time subsistence allowance and transportation allowance in case
of displaced families;
f) particulars of payment for cattle shed and petty shops;
g) particulars of one-time amount to artisans and small traders;
h) details of mandatory employment to be provided to the members of the affected
families;
i) particulars of any fishing rights that may be involved;
j) particulars of annuity and other entitlements to be provided;
k) particulars of special provisions for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
to be provided.
In case any of the matters specified under clauses (a) to (k) are not applicable to any affected
family the same should be indicated as not applicable. Further by way of notification the
appropriate Government has the power to increase the rate of rehabilitation and resettlement
amount payable to the affected families, taking into account the rise in the price index.
Provision of infrastructural amenities in resettlement area
In every resettlement area as defined under this Act, the Collector is entrusted with the duty
to ensure the provision of all infrastructural facilities and basic minimum amenities.
POWERS OF THE COLLECTOR
1. Power to make corrections to awards
Under Sec.33(1) the Collector is empowered to correct any clerical or arithmetical mistakes
in either of the awards or errors either on his own motion or on the application of any person
interested or local Authority. This can be done at any time, but not later than six months from
the date of award or before making reference to the Authority under Sec.64 But any
correction which is likely to affect any person prejudicially should not be made unless such
person has been given a reasonable opportunity of making representation in the matter. The
Collector should give immediate notice of any correction made in the award so corrected to
all the persons interested. Where any excess amount is proved to have been paid to any
person as a result of such correction the excess amount so paid is to be refunded by the
recipient and in the case of any default or refusal to pay, the same may be recovered from
such person.
Once the award is passed, there is no question of any correction in the notification
under Sec.4(1)(Sec.11 in RFCTLARR Act, 2013) or declaration under Sec.6 of the
Act. The Act under Sec.13A(Sec.33 in RFCTLARR Act, 2013) provides for
correction of clerical mistakes in the award and that too only within six months. There
is no question of an award being passed in respect of a property, for which there is no
notification and consequently declaration – State of UP Vs. Abdul Ali
Establishment
Sec.51 envisages the establishment of Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority
By way of a notification the appropriate Government has the power to establish one or more
Authorities to be known as the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority to
exercise jurisdiction, powers and authority conferred on it for the purpose of providing speedy
disposal of disputes relating to:
a) land acquisition
b) compensation
The appropriate Government should specify in the notification the areas within which the Authority
is to exercise jurisdiction for entertaining and deciding the references made to it or applications
made by the applicant.
Composition of Authority
The Authority consists of only one person to be known as the Presiding Officer. The appropriate
Government can authorise the Presiding Officer of one Authority to discharge the functions of the
Presiding Officer of another Authority also.
a) District Judge; or
A Presiding Officer is appointed by the appropriate Government in consultation with the Chief
Justice of a High Court in whose jurisdiction the Authority is proposed to be established.
The Presiding Officer of an Authority will hold the office for a term of three years from the date on
which he enters upon his office or until he attains the age of sixty-five years, whichever is earlier.
The Presiding Officer of an Authority resign his office by giving a notice in writing under his hand and
addressed to the appropriate Government
(b) until a person duly appointed as his successor enters upon his office or
(c) until the expiry of his term of office, whichever is earlier until and unless he is permitted
by the appropriate Government to relinquish his office sooner.
The Presiding Officer of an Authority should not be removed from his office except by an order made
by the appropriate Government on the ground of proven misbehaviour or incapacity after inquiry in
the case of the Presiding Officer of an Authority made by a Judge of a High Court in which the
Presiding Officer concerned has been informed of the charges against him and given a reasonable
opportunity of being heard in respect of these charges.
By way of rules the appropriate Government has the power to regulate the procedure for the
investigation of misbehaviour or incapacity of such Presiding Officer.
For the purposes of its functions the Authority has the same powers as are vested in a civil court
under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) in respect of the following matters, namely:—
(a) summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on oath;
(b) discovery and production of any document or other material object producible as
evidence;
The Authority has original jurisdiction to adjudicate upon every reference made to it The Authority
should not be bound by the procedure laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) but
should be guided by the principles of natural justice and the Authority also has the power to regulate
its own procedure. The Authority after receiving reference and after giving notice of such reference
to all the parties concerned and after affording opportunity of hearing to all parties should dispose
of such reference within a period of six months from the date of receipt of such reference and make
an award accordingly. The Authority should arrange to deliver copies of the award to the parties
concerned within a period of fifteen days from the date of such award.
• market value