The Secrets of Successful Female Networkers
The Secrets of Successful Female Networkers
The Secrets of Successful Female Networkers
Tim Bower
Efficient.
Studies, including the new one, show that women generally
absorb more collaborative demands in the workplace than their
male peers do. But the female managers with the strongest
networks “recognize that every ‘yes’ means a ‘no’ to something
else,” says Babson College’s Rob Cross, one of Carboni’s coauthors.
He notes that one Silicon Valley executive he knows has adopted
that idea as her mantra. Although these successful female
networkers might feel an identity-driven desire and a stereotype-
influenced pressure to help colleagues out and be a team player,
they try to resist. They prune nonessential appointments from
their calendars, deflect low-priority decisions and requests, run
streamlined meetings, insist on efficient email norms, and set
aside time for reflection and high-level thinking. At the same
time, they make the most of their collaborative strengths and
inclinations by working with others in a way that establishes or
enhances key relationships and ups their visibility.
Nimble.
The researchers’ data shows that most women’s relationships,
particularly those with female peers, are stickier than men’s,
growing stronger, more mutual, and more interwoven over time.
Carboni and Cross note that this can occasionally be a positive—
for example, an old contact might offer a new opportunity or
employment prospect. But if you work in a dynamic organization
that requires rapid adjustments to changing demands (and who
doesn’t nowadays?), always relying on the same people can hurt
your performance.
Boundary-spanning.
The highest-ranking, best-networked women connect with people
in a wide variety of functions, geographies, and business units.
Again, less successful female networkers tend to shy away from
the tactic because it feels uncomfortable or overly promotional.
“We heard from women that they liked their own communities,”
Carboni says, whereas spanning boundaries made them wary of
“backlash” and “stressed out.” But that behavior is critical to
accessing new information, leading innovation, and pursuing
advancement, for both women and men. Cross suggests
periodically considering the leaders in your organization and
asking yourself, “Who isn’t in my network but should be?” He
advises approaching them “not with ‘Here’s what I need’ but with
‘Could we grab a coffee and explore ways of working together?’”
Companies including Ford and Booz Allen Hamilton have tried to
institutionalize the practice by setting up cross-functional groups
of female high potentials who meet regularly with C-suite
executives.
“You’re Closer to Everyone Than You Think”
Energy-balanced.
More than two decades’ worth of research shows, perhaps not
surprisingly, that the highest performers are seen as the most
energizing people in their networks—as the type of colleague who
makes the work more engaging, which then drives better
performance. But men and women are expected to bring different
energy to relationships, and this is where effective female
networkers set themselves apart from less successful women:
They demonstrate both competence and warmth, both
intelligence and emotional intelligence, as studies—the
researchers’ and others—suggest they must to build trust. “The
most successful women don’t downplay their knowledge, skills,
and accomplishments; they show evidence that they can do
things,” Cross says. “But they also use humor, presence, and small
gestures to signal caring and positivity, and they employ listening
skills to spur creative thinking among their colleagues.”
The researchers say they hope more women will adapt their
networking behaviors in keeping with these four characteristics.
They add that organizations have a big role to play too. “The goal
is to embed these behaviors and practices so that they’re the norm
for everybody,” Cross says.
About the Research: “How Successful Women Manage Their Networks,” by Inga
Carboni et al. (working paper)
AHarvard
versionBusiness
of this article appeared in the November–December 2019 issue of
Review.