0% found this document useful (0 votes)
331 views17 pages

Riemann Integral Answers

This document contains the answers to tutorial questions for the course Pure Mathematics PMM203G3 - Analysis at the University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka. The questions cover concepts related to Riemann integration including: - The sum of two Riemann integrable functions is Riemann integrable - A constant multiple of a Riemann integrable function is Riemann integrable - If one function is less than or equal to another, the integral of the first is less than or equal to the integral of the second - The absolute value of a Riemann integrable function is Riemann integrable and its integral is less than or equal to the integral

Uploaded by

yfyjjk
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
331 views17 pages

Riemann Integral Answers

This document contains the answers to tutorial questions for the course Pure Mathematics PMM203G3 - Analysis at the University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka. The questions cover concepts related to Riemann integration including: - The sum of two Riemann integrable functions is Riemann integrable - A constant multiple of a Riemann integrable function is Riemann integrable - If one function is less than or equal to another, the integral of the first is less than or equal to the integral of the second - The absolute value of a Riemann integrable function is Riemann integrable and its integral is less than or equal to the integral

Uploaded by

yfyjjk
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka

General Degree Examination in Science - Level 2G - 2018


Pure Mathematics
PMM203G3 - Analysis - Answers

Tutorial No-01

Z b Z b Z b
1. (a) Claim: f + g ∈ R [a, b] and (f + g) dx = f (x)dx + g(x)dx
a a a

Let h = f + g and ε > 0 be arbitrary.

Since f ∈ R [a, b] and g ∈ R [a, b]

ε
∃P1 ∈ P [a, b] such that U (P1 , f ) − L(P1 , f ) < 2 and

ε
∃P2 ∈ P [a, b] such that U (P2 , g) − L(P2 , g) < 2

Put P = P1 ∪ P2

ε ε
Then U (P, f ) − L(P, f ) < 2 and U (P, g) − L(P, g) < 2

⇒ [U (P, f ) + U (P, g)] − [L(P, f ) + L(P, g)] < ε

But U (P, h) ≤ U (P, f ) + U (P, g) and L(P, h) ≥ L(P, f ) + L(P, g)

∴ U (P, h) − L(P, h) < ε

Since ε > 0 is arbitrary,

∀ε > 0, ∃P ∈ P such that U (P, h) − L(P, h) < ε


∴ h ∈ R [a, b]

That is f + g ∈ R [a, b].

1
Z Z
ε
Since f= inf U (P, f ), ∃P1 ∈ P [a, b] such that U (P1 , f ) < f+
P ∈P[a,b] 2
Z Z
ε
Since g = inf U (P, g), ∃P1 ∈ P [a, b] such that U (P1 , g) < g +
P ∈P[a,b] 2

Let P = P1 ∪ P2

Then U (P1 , f ) > U (P, f ) and U (P2 , g) > U (P, g)


Z Z Z
ε ε
f +g ≤ U (P, h) ≤ U (P, f )+U (P, g) < U (P1 , f )+U (P2 , g) < f + + g+
2 2

Z Z Z
∴ f +g < f+ g + ε, ∀ε > 0

Z Z Z
⇒ f +g ≤ f+ g (1)

Similarly, we can obtain


Z Z Z
ε ε
f + g ≥ L(P, h) ≥ L(P, f ) + L(P, g) > f − + g −
2 2

Z Z Z
f +g > f+ g − ε, ∀ε > 0

Z Z Z
⇒ f +g ≥ f+ g (2)
Z Z Z
Now (1), (2) ⇒ f +g = f+ g

2
Z b Z b
(b) Claim: h = λf ∈ R [a, b] and λf = f
a a

Let ε > 0

Since f ∈ R [a, b], we have


ε
∃P ∈ P [a, b] such that U (p, f ) − L(P, f ) < : λ 6= 0
|λ|
Let P = {x0 = a < x1 < x2 < · · · < xi−1 < xi < · · · < xn = b} ∈ P [a, b]
 
Xn 
Then U (P, h) − L(P, h) = sup λf (x) − inf λf (x) 4 xi
i=1
x∈[xi−1,x ] x∈[xi−1,xi ] 
i
 n n
!
 X X
λ sup f (x) 4 xi − inf f (x) 4 xi , if λ ≥ 0



x∈[x ,x
i−1 i ] x∈[x i−1 ,xi ]
i=1 i=1
= n n
!
 X X
λ inf f (x) 4 xi − sup f (x) 4 xi , if λ ≤ 0



x∈[xi−1 ,xi ]
i=1 i=1 x∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

 n n
!
 X X
λ sup f (x) 4 xi − inf f (x) 4 xi , if λ ≥ 0



x∈[xi−1 ,xi ]
i=1 x∈[xi−1 ,xi ] i=1
= n n
!
 X X
−λ sup f (x) 4 xi − inf f (x) 4 xi , if λ ≤ 0



x∈[xi−1 ,xi ]
i=1 x∈[xi−1 ,xi ] i=1

= |λ| (U (P, f ) − L(P, F ))

∴ U (P, h) − L(P, h) = |λ| (U (P, f ) − L(P, F ))

⇒ U (P, h) − L(P, h) < ε

∴ ∀ε > 0, ∃P ∈ P [a, b] such that U (P, h) − L(P, h) < ε

∴ Hence, λf ∈ R [a, b]
Z
λf = inf U (P, λf )
P ∈P[a,b]

3

λU (P, f )
 if λ ≥ 0
= inf
P ∈P[a,b] 
λL(P, f ) if λ ≤ 0


λ inf U (P, f ) if λ ≥ 0
 P ∈P[a,b]


=

λ inf L(P, f ) if λ ≤ 0


P ∈P[a,b]

Z
=λ f

Z Z
Therefore, λf = λ f

Z b Z b
(c) Claim: If f ≤ g then f (x)dx ≤ g(x)dx.
a a

Since f, g ∈ R [a, b], g − f ∈ R [a, b].

But f ≤ g

⇒g−f ≥0
Z b
⇒ (g − f ) dx ≥ 0.
a
Z b Z b
(i.e) f (x)dx ≤ g(x)dx.
a a

Z b Z b

(d) Claim: |f | ∈ R[a, b] and f (x)dx ≤ |f (x)| dx.
a a

Since f ∈ R [a, b]

∀ε > 0, ∃P ∈ P [a, b] such that U (P, f ) − L(P, f ) < ε (3)

Let P = {x0 = a < x1 < x2 < · · · < xi−1 < xi < · · · < xn = b} ∈ P [a, b]

4
Consider

sup |f (x)| − inf |f (y)| = sup (|f (x)| − |f (y)|)


x∈[xi−1 ,xi ] y∈[xi−1 ,xi ] x,y∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

≤ sup (|f (x) − f (y)|)


x∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

= sup f (x) − inf f (y)


x∈[xi−1 ,xi ] y∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

(i.e) sup |f (x)| − inf |f (y)| ≤ sup f (x) − inf f (y)


x∈[xi−1 ,xi ] y∈[xi−1 ,xi ] x∈[xi−1 ,xi ] y∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

⇒ U (P, |f |) − L(P, |f |) ≤ U (P, f ) − L(P, f ) (4)

Equation (3) ⇒ U (P, |f |) − L(P, |f |) < ε

⇒ |f | ∈ < [a, b]

Since f (x) ≤ |f (x)| and −f (x) ≤ |f (x)| ,

Z b Z b Z b Z b
f (x)dx ≤ |f (x)| dx and −f (x)dx ≤ |f (x)| dx,
a a a a

Z b Z b

⇒ f (x)dx ≤ |f (x)| dx.
a a

(e) Claim: If f, g ∈ R[a, b] then f.g ∈ R[a, b].

Since f, g are bounded, ∃M > 0 s.t |f (x)| ≤ M and |g(x)| ≤ M for all
x ∈ [a, b]

Since f ∈ R [a, b] ,

∀ε > 0, ∃P1 ∈ P [a, b] such that U (P1 , f ) − L(P1 , f ) < ε

5
Since g ∈ R [a, b] ,

∀ε > 0, ∃P2 ∈ P [a, b] such that U (P2 , f ) − L(P2 , f ) < ε

Let P = P1 ∪ P2
ε ε
Then U (P, f ) − L(P, f ) < and U (P, g) − L(P, g) < (5)
2M 2M

Let P = {x0 = a < x1 < x2 < · · · < xi−1 < xi < · · · < xn = b} ∈ P [a, b]

Then sup f (x)g(x) − inf f (x)g(x)


x∈[xi−1 ,xi ] x∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

= sup |f (x)g(x) − f (y)g(y)|


x,y∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

= sup |f (x) (g(x) − g(y)) + g(y) (f (x) − f (y))|


x,y∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

= sup {|f (x)| |g(x) − g(y)| + |g(y)| |f (x) − f (y)|}


x,y∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

≤ sup {|f (x)| |g(x) − g(y)| + |g(y)| |f (x) − f (y)|}


x,y∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

≤ sup {M |g(x) − g(y)| + M |f (x) − f (y)|}


x,y∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

( )
≤M sup |g(x) − g(y)| + sup |f (x) − f (y)|
x,y∈[xi−1 ,xi ] x,y∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

( ) ( )
=M sup g(x) − inf g(y) +M sup f (x) − inf f (y)
x,y∈[xi−1 ,xi ] x,y∈[xi−1 ,xi ] x,y∈[xi−1 ,xi ] x,y∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

⇒ U (P, f g)−L(P, f g) ≤ M (U (P, f ) − L(P, f ))+M (U (P, g) − L(P, g)) (6)

6
Equation(5) and Equation(6) ⇒
ε ε
U (P, f g) − L(P, f g) < M. + M. =ε
2M 2M

(i.e) ∀ε > 0, ∃P ∈ P [a, b] s.t U (P, f g) − L(P, f g) < ε

(i.e) f.g ∈ R [a, b] .

(f) Exercise.

2. Assume that lim S(P, f, ξ) = γ.


||p||→0

Let  > 0 be arbitrary.


 
Since S(P, f, ξ) → γ as ||p|| → 0, ∃ δ > 0 s.t γ− < S(P, f, ξ) < γ+ , ∀P with ||p|| < δ
2 2
(7)

Since Mi = sup f (x) and mi = inf f (x), ∃ξi , ηi ∈ [xi−1 , xi ] s.t


x∈[xi−1 ,xi ] x∈[xi−1 ,xi ]

ε ε
f (ξi ) > Mi − and f (ηi ) > Mi +
2(b − a) 2(b − a)
Then
n n n
X X X ε ε
S(P, f, ξ) = f (ξ)∆xi ≥ Mi ∆xi − ∆xi = U (P, f ) −
i=1 i=1 i=i
2(b − a) 2

ε
(i.e) S(P, f, ξ) ≥ U (P, f ) − (8)
2
Similarly,
n n n
X X X ε ε
S(P, f, η) = f (ηi )∆xi ≤ mi ∆xi + ∆xi = L(P, f ) +
i=1 i=1 i=i
2(b − a) 2

ε
(i.e) S(P, f, η) ≤ L(P, f ) + (9)
2

7
Equation(8) and Equation(9) ⇒
ε ε
U (P, f ) − ≤ S(P, f, ξ) < γ +
2 2

⇒ U (P, f ) < γ + ε (10)

Equation(7) and Equation(9) ⇒


ε ε
γ− < S(P, f, η) ≤ L(P, f ) +
2 2

⇒ γ − ε < L(P, f ) (11)

Equation(10) and Equation(11) ⇒

⇒ γ − ε < L(P, f ) ≤ U (P, f ) < γ + ε (12)


But
Z b Z b
f (x)dx ≤ U (P, f ) and f (x)dx ≥ L(P, f ) (13)
a a

Equation(12) and Equation(13) ⇒

Z b Z b
f (x)dx < f (x)dx + 2ε, ∀ε > 0
a a

Z b Z b
⇒ f (x)dx ≤ f (x)dx
a a

But clearly,
Z b Z b
f (x)dx ≤ f (x)dx
a a

8
Hence Z b Z b
f (x)dx = f (x)dx.
a a

∴ f ∈ R[a, b].

Also from Equation(10) and Equation(11), we obtain

Z b
γ−ε< f (x)dx < γ + ε, ∀ ε > 0.
a

Z b
⇒ f (x)dx = γ
a

Note: Assume that f ∈ R[a, b]. Let  > 0 be arbitrary.


Z b Z b
Then ∃ δ > 0 such that f (x)dx − ε < L(P, f ) ≤ U (P, f ) < f (x)dx + ε
a a

for any partition of [a, b] with ||P || < δ.

Since, f ∈ R[a, b] & L(P, f ) ≤ S(P, f, ξ) ≤ U (P, f ), ∀P ∈ P[a, b],

Z b Z b
we have f (x)dx − ε < S(P, f, ξ) < f (x)d(x) + ε, ∀ P with ||P || < δ.
a a

Z b

∴ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0 such that f (x)dx − S(P, f, ξ) < , ∀ P with ||P || < δ
a

Z b
∴ lim S(P, f, ξ) = f (x)dx.
||p||→0 a

9
Z 4
112
x2 + 2x dx =

3. (a)
0 3
Z b n
X b−a
Note that f (x)dx = lim f (ξi )∆x, ∆x = , ξi = a + (∆x)i
a n→∞
i=1
n
Let f (x) = x2 + 2x

b−a 4−0 4
∆x = = =
n n n
 
4 4i
ξi = 0 + i=
n n
 2
16i2 8i
 
4i 4i
f (ξi ) = (ξi )2 + 2(ξi ) = +2 = 2 +
n n n n
Z 4 n 
16i2 8i 4
X 
2

x + 2x dx = lim 2
+
0 n→∞
i=1
n n n
n 
64i2 32i
X 
= lim 3
+ 2
n→∞
i=1
n n
n  2 
X 2i i
= 32 lim 3
+ 2
n→∞ n n
i=1 
2 n(n + 1)(2n + 1) 1 n(n + 1)
= 32 lim + 2
n→∞ n3 6 n 2
1 (2n2 + 3n + 1) (n + 1)
 
= 32 lim +
n→∞ 3 n2 2n
 
2 1
= 32 +
3 2
7
= 32 ×
6
112
=
3

10
Z 3
(b) 2x3 + x − 1 = 42
1

Let f (x) = 2x3 + x − 1


   
b−a 2 2 2i
∆x = = ξi = a + (∆x) i = 1 + i = 1+
n n n n
 3  
2i 2i
f (ξi ) = 2 1 + + 1+ −1
n n
"    2  3 #
2i 2i 2i 2i
=2 1+3 +3 + +
n n n n

16i3 24i2 14i


 
= + 2 + +2
n3 n n
Z 3 n  3 2
 
X 16i 24i 14i 2
2x3 + x − 1 dx = lim

+ + + 2
1 n→∞
i=1
n3 n2 n n

n 
32i3 48i2 28i 4
X 
= lim + 3 + 2 +
n→∞
i=1
n4 n n n

8(n2 + 2n + 1)
 
8 2
 14(n + 1)
= lim + 2n + 3n + 1 + +4
n→∞ n2 n2 n

= 8 + 16 + 14 + 4

= 42

11
Z 1
1
(c) x3 dx =
0 4

Let f (x) = x3

b−a 1 1 i
∆x = = ξi = a + (∆x) i = 0 + i =
n n n n

 3
i i3
f (ξi ) = = 3
n n
Z 1 n  3
X i 1
x3 dx = lim
0 n→∞
i=1
n3 n
n
1 X 3
= lim 4 i
n→∞ n
i=1

1 n2 (n + 1)2
= lim 4
n→∞ n 4
(n + 1)2
= lim
n→∞ 4n2
1
=
4

12
Z b   
1 1 1
(d) dx = −
a x2 a b

Let P = {x0 = a < x1 < x2 < · · · < xi−1 < xi < · · · < xn = b} be a partition
of [a, b]

Choose ξi = xi xi−1 , i = 1, 2, 3, · · · , n

Then ξi ∈ [xi−1 , xi ] , i = 1, 2, 3, · · · , n

Then
n
X
S(P, f, ξ) = f (ξi )∆xi
i=1
n
X 1
= (xi − xi−1 )
i=1
x i xi−1

n  
X 1 1
= −
i=1
x i−1 xi
1 1
= −
x0 xn
1 1
= −
a b

This shows that for each partition, there is an appropriate choice of points
1 1
ξi0 s for which S(P, f, ξ) = −
a b
1 1
Therefore, lim S(P, f, ξ) = −
kpk→0 a b

Z b 
1 1 1
⇒ f ∈ R[a, b] and dx = −
a x2 a b

13
Z b
1 √ √ 
(e) √ dx = 2 b− a
a x

Let P = {x0 = a < x1 < x2 < · · · < xi−1 < xi < · · · < xn = b} be a partition
of [a, b]

xi + xi−1 2
√ 
Choose ξi = , i = 1, 2, 3, · · · , n
2
Then ξi ∈ [xi−1 , xi ] , i = 1, 2, 3, · · · , n

Then
n
X
S(P, f, ξ) = f (ξi )∆xi
i=1
n
X 2
= √ √ (xi − xi−1 )
i=1
xi + xi−1
n
X √ √
= 2 ( xi − xi−1 )
i=1
√ √
= 2 ( xn − x0 )
√ √ 
= 2 b− a

This shows that for each partition,


√ there
 is an appropriate choice of points

ξi0 s for which S(P, f, ξ) = 2 b− a

√ √ 
Therefore, lim S(P, f, ξ) = 2 b− a
kpk→0

Z b
1 √ √ 
⇒ f ∈ R[a, b] and √ dx = 2 b− a
a x

14
4. (a) Exercise

(b) Suppose that f is Riemann integrable. Let


 
1 2 i−1 i
Pn = x0 = 0 < x1 = < x2 = < · · · < xi−1 = < xi = < · · · < xn = 1
n n n n
be a partition of [0, 1]
i
choose ξi = , i = 1, 2, 3, · · · , n
n
Then ξi ∈ [xi−1 , xi ] , i = 1, 2, 3, · · · , n

lim (S, Pn , ξ) = lim f (ξi )∆xi


n→∞ n→∞

n  
X i 1
= lim 1+
n→∞
i=1
n n
n  
X 1 i
= lim +
n→∞
i=1
n n2
 
1 1 n(n + 1)
= lim .n + 2
n→∞ n n 2
 
3n + 1
= lim
n→∞ 2n
3
=
2
i−1
Again choose ξi0 = , i = 1, 2, 3, · · · , n
n
Then ξi0 ∈ [xi−1 , xi ] , i = 1, 2, 3, · · · , n

lim (S, Pn , ξi0 ) = lim f (ξi0 )∆xi


n→∞ n→∞

n   
X i−1 1
= lim 1−
n→∞
i=1
n n

15
n  
X 1 i 1
= lim − 2+ 2
n→∞
i=1
n n n

 
n+1
= lim
n→∞ 2n

1
=
2

This is a Contradiction.

Hence f is not Riemann integrable.

(c) Suppose that f is Riemann integrable. Let


 
1 2 i−1 i
Pn = x0 = 0 < x1 = < x2 = < · · · < xi−1 = < xi = < · · · < xn = 1
n n n n
be a partition of [0, 1]
i
choose ξi = , i = 1, 2, 3, · · · , n
n
Then ξi ∈ [xi−1 , xi ] , i = 1, 2, 3, · · · , n

lim (S, Pn , ξ) = lim f (ξ)∆xi


n→∞ n→∞

n  
X i 1
= lim
n→∞
i=1
n n

1 n(n + 1)
= lim
n→∞ n2 2
 
n+1 1
= lim =
n→∞ 2n 2

lim (S, Pn , ξi0 ) = lim f (ξi0 )∆xi =0


n→∞ n→∞

16
This is a Contradiction.

Hence f is not Riemann integrable.


5. Exercise
6. Exercise

17

You might also like