Qualification of Submerged Arc Welding Consumables and Procedures To ABS Rules
Qualification of Submerged Arc Welding Consumables and Procedures To ABS Rules
Submerged Arc
Welding Consumables
and Procedures to ABS
Rules
Darren Begg
Reference: 6134C.FR
November 14, 2008
6134C.FR
FINAL REPORT
Submitted to:
ATI
5300 International Blvd
North Charleston, S.C.
29418
Submitted by:
BMT Fleet Technology Limited accepts no liability for any errors or omissions or for any loss, damage, claim or other demand in
connection with the usage of this report, insofar as those errors and omissions, claims or other demands are due to any
incomplete or inaccurate information supplied to BMT Fleet Technology Limited for the purpose of preparing this report.
BMT Fleet Technology Limited 6134C.FR
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to thank the following for their contribution and support throughout this
project:
ABBREVIATIONS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................... 1
2. SCOPE OF WORK .................................................................................................................. 2
3. TASKS ..................................................................................................................................... 3
3.1 Task 1: Welding Electrode Qualification ...................................................................... 3
3.2 Task 2: Welding Procedure Qualification ..................................................................... 3
4. RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 4
4.1 Task 1: Welding Electrode Qualification ...................................................................... 4
4.1.1 High Cooling Rate Test (Low Heat Input) ....................................................... 5
4.1.2 Low Cooling Rate Test (High Heat Input) ....................................................... 6
4.2 Task 2: Welding Procedure Qualification ..................................................................... 8
4.2.1 HSLA-65 (1 inch thickness only): ................................................................. 11
4.2.2 EH36 (1/2" and 1 inch Thicknesses): ............................................................. 12
4.2.3 Welding Procedure Testing Results ............................................................... 12
5. SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 26
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Hobart Preliminary Test Results
Appendix B: Welding Electrode Low Heat Input Certification Lab Records
Appendix C: Welding Electrode High Heat Input Certification Lab Records
Appendix D: Welding Electrode Certification Test Results
Appendix E: Mill Test Reports
Appendix F: Lab Records and Welding Procedure Data Sheets
Appendix G: UT Reports
Appendix H: All Weld Metal Tensile Test Reports
Appendix I: Cross Weld Tensile Test Reports
Appendix J: Charpy Impact Test Reports
Appendix K: Hardness Results
Appendix L: Weld Metal Chemical Analysis Results
Appendix M: ABS Statement of Fact
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
1. BACKGROUND
The welding procedures developed under NSRP/ASE Project 2005-386 demonstrated significant
productivity enhancements along with mechanical properties that comfortably met stringent
NAVSEA requirements. Productivity enhancements as high as 1200% were identified with
potential cost reductions approaching 65%, with weld metal deposition rates exceeded 110 lbs/hr,
significantly higher compared to current practice. General Dynamics NASSCO requested that
the results of this recently completed project be used to produce and qualify highly productive
welding procedures under American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) Rules for HSLA-65 and EH36
steels, using variable balance AC (VBAC) submerged arc welding (SAW) and metal cored
electrode technologies. The procedures included the single pass one-sided welding (OSW) onto
flux copper backing (FCB) and one pass per side two sided welding no with backgouging
techniques, both in a tandem arrangement.
2. SCOPE OF WORK
The main deliverables in this project are ABS qualified highly productive welding procedures for
one-sided and two sided welding that will allow shipyards to readily adopt these techniques into
practice. Each shipyard that implements these technologies will expect to significantly reduce
their labor costs per foot of completed weld joint and also decrease their electrode and flux
consumption requirements.
The following welding procedures were qualified and registered under ABS Rules:
• Single pass OSW of ½” and 1 inch thick EH36 and HSLA-65 steels onto a FCB
• Single pass per side two sided welding (no backgouging) of ½ and 1 inch thick EH36 and
HSLA-65 steels
OSW procedures were developed and qualified with Kobelco PFI-50R backing flux to be aligned
with the current production techniques used at GD NASSCO. The welding electrode/flux
combination was also qualified under this testing matrix.
All developmental work, welding of test plates, and mechanical testing of specimens were
performed by BMT FTL, with all welding of test plates and testing of mechanical property
specimens being witnessed by an ABS representative.
3. TASKS
The objectives of this project were met with the completion of the following tasks:
4. RESULTS
The formulation of the welding electrode is provided in Table 4.1. The electrode is classified as
AWS A5.23 ECM3, and the trade name is TriMark Metalloy M3S.
Prior to sending the electrodes to BMT, the electrode manufacture Hobart/Trimark produced a
series of test welds on flat plate in accordance with AWS A5.23 to determine the undiluted
chemistry of the weld deposit using two fluxes, i.e., Hobart/TriMark HN-511 and Lincoln MIL-
800H. The result of this analysis is shown in Table 4.2.
In addition, Hobart conducted some preliminary testing of the electrode with TriMark HN-511
flux in accordance with AWS A5.23 to examine the resulting mechanical properties. The
welding conditions used as well as the results of this testing is given as Appendix A. To
summarize, the weld metal demonstrated the following:
Test plates for the electrode/flux qualification tests were made from 1-inch thick, 40-inch long
HSLA-65 plate. The welds were manufactured using a single electrode with DCEP polarity. The
5/32” diameter Metalloy M3S electrode’s lot number was N812342301611. The Lincoln MIL-
800H flux used for all welding had a stock and lot number of ED020925 and 11471002,
respectively.
Each of the welds fabricated were subjected to 100% visual inspection, as well as Magnetic
Particle Testing (MPT) and Ultrasonic Testing (UT). The welding conditions as witnessed by
ABS were as follows:
The test weld required 13 passes to fill the joint, two passes per fill layer and three cap passes, as
shown in Figure 4.1. The lab records of the parameters as witnessed and signed by ABS are
provided as Appendix B.
The test weld required 6 passes to fill the joint as shown in Figure 4.2. The lab records pf the
parameters as witnessed and signed by ABS are provided as Appendix C.
Visual inspection as well as MPT and UT revealed no flaws within the weld metal. From each of
the test plates fabricated, 2 all weld metal tensile specimens and 5 weld metal notched Charpy V-
notch impact specimens were extracted and tested. The specimens were extracted as per Figure
4.3, at the T/2 location.
The results of the tensile and impact testing are summarized in Tables 4.3 and 4.4, respectively,
and the reports as signed and witnessed by ABS are given as Appendix D.
Table 4.4: High and Low Cooling Rate Weld Metal Impact Test Results
Procedure Location Specimen Temperature Absorbed Energy
ft/lbs
65-CT-HH WM 1 -20°F 85
T/2 2 105
3 105
4 108
5 108
Average 106
65-CT-LH WM 1 -20°F 68
T/2 2 100
3 75
4 78
5 95
Average 83
The results show that the tensile, yield, and impact requirements are comfortably met over the
entire heat input range, however the elongation on the high heat input welds were below
minimum requirements. On the fracture surface of the high heat input tension specimens and
throughout their gauge lengths, there appeared to be evidence of cracking. The surfaces were
bright and had the characteristics of hydrogen embrittlement. None of this cracking was detected
during NDT of the test plates and it is therefore believed the cracking occurred during the low
strain rate tension testing. It is possible that a post weld aging treatment of the tension specimen
would have released all traces of hydrogen in the specimen and thus enhanced the elongation
properties achieved in the results. Regardless, the yield and ultimate tensile properties meet the
minimum requirements.
In addition, diffusible hydrogen tests were conducted on the electrode flux combination using
75% of the highest amperage range used, i.e., 450A. The travel speed and voltage for each test
specimen was held constant at 22ipm and 27V, respectively. Hydrogen analysis was conducted
in accordance with AWS A4.3 using the under mercury method. The results of the hydrogen
analysis in 4 specimens after being held at 45°C for 72 hrs were 2.2, 2.4, 2.4, and 2.5 ml/100g of
weld metal deposited.
The ABS signed lab work sheets along with welding procedure data sheets for each of the welds
fabricated are provided as Appendix F.
The identification system used for each of the welding procedures was as follows:
½” Thickness
• 36-OSW-0.5 = EH36 Base Metal, One Sided Welded
• 36-DS-0.5 = EH36 Base Metal, Two Sided Weld, no backgouging
• 65-OSW-0.5 = HSLA-65 Base Metal, One Sided Weld
• 65-DS-0.5 = HSLA-65 Base Metal, Two Sided Weld, no backgouging
1” Thickness
• 36-OSW-1 = EH36 Base Metal, One Sided Weld
• 36-DS-1 = EH36 Base Metal, Two Sided Weld, no backgouging
• 65-OSW-1 = HSLA-65 Base Metal, One Sided Weld
• 65-DS-1 = HSLA-65 Base Metal, Two Sided Weld, no backgouging
All tandem SAW work was performed using Miller Summit Arc 1000 power sources and
witnessed by ABS. Sample macrosections from ½” and 1” OSW and DS welds are shown in
Figures 4.4 to 4.7.
The mechanical test matrix is described following in Sections 4.2.1 and 4.2.2.
½" Plates
1" Plates
Weld metal chemical analysis samples were also extracted from each fractured all weld metal
tensile specimens from the 1” thick test plates.
* Specimens extracted from run on and run off tab locations and failed due to solidifcation
cracks in specimens.
36 DS ½” WM 1 -4°F 105
2 113
3 108
4 117
5 111
Average 114
6 -40°F 89
7 100
8 100
9 100
10 78
Average 96
5. SUMMARY
A welding electrode formulation was manufactured by Hobart/Trimark as trade name Metalloy
M3S under classification AWS A5.23 ECM3. The electrode was subjected to high and low
cooling rate tests using Lincoln MIL-800H flux. Mechanical test specimens were extracted to
determine all weld metal tension and impact properties under the two cooling rate conditions.
The results show that the yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, and impact properties
comfortably meet minimum requirements. The elongation of the high heat input weld however
did not meet the requirements likely as the result of hydrogen embrittlement.
The electrode flux combination was then used to qualify welding procedures in EH36 and HSLA-
65 steels of 0.5 and 1.0 inch thickness. The procedures consisted of single pass tandem one sided
welding onto Kobelco backing flux as well as tandem two sided welding (one pass per side)
without backgouging. The welds were subjected to cross weld and all weld metal tensile testing,
weld metal and HAZ impact testing, and bend testing. All results met the minimum requirements
for ultimate tensile and yield strength, impact toughness, and ductility. The 1.0 inch thick welds
were further examined for hardness and all weld metal chemical analysis, and the results are
reported.
All welding of test plates and testing of specimens was witnessed by ABS. A copy of ABS’s
Statement of Fact is included as Appendix M.
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
APPENDIX E
APPENDIX F
WPS No.:
Welding Procedure Data __________________________
Welding Process: SAW Electrode Type: Metal Cored Flux: Lincoln MIL-800H
Travel Direction Lead Wire: 0°Drag Travel Direction Trail Wire: 15°Push Angle
In. Wire Side Layer Pass In’s ipm In. A V In. ipm In.
WPS No.:
Welding Procedure Data __________________________
Welding Process: SAW Electrode Type: Metal Cored Flux: Lincoln MIL-800H
Travel Direction Lead Wire: 0°Drag Travel Direction Trail Wire: 15°Push Angle
Single or Multiple Arc: Multiple (Tandem Arc) Weld first side of joint, flip plate and weld side 2.
Rg = 0
Single or Multipass: Single
In. Wire Side Layer Pass In’s ipm In. A V In. ipm In.
WPS No.:
Welding Procedure Data __________________________
Welding Process: SAW Electrode Type: Metal Cored Flux: Lincoln MIL-800H
Travel Direction Lead Wire: 15°Drag Travel Direction Trail Wire: 0°Angle
In. Wire Side Layer Pass In’s ipm In. A V In. ipm In.
WPS No.:
Welding Procedure Data __________________________
Welding Process: SAW Electrode Type: Metal Cored Flux: Lincoln MIL-800H
Travel Direction Lead Wire: 0°Drag Travel Direction Trail Wire: 15°Push Angle
Single or Multiple Arc: Multiple (Tandem Arc) Ө1=70° Included Angle, Ө2=90° Included Angle, Rg = 0, Rf = 5/16,
E1=7/16, E2=1/4
Single or Multipass: Single
In. Wire Side Layer Pass In’s ipm In. A V In. ipm In.
WPS No.:
Welding Procedure Data __________________________
Welding Process: SAW Electrode Type: Metal Cored Flux: Lincoln MIL-800H
Travel Direction Lead Wire: 0°Drag Travel Direction Trail Wire: 15°Push Angle
In. Wire Side Layer Pass In’s ipm In. A V In. ipm In.
WPS No.:
Welding Procedure Data __________________________
Welding Process: SAW Electrode Type: Metal Cored Flux: Lincoln MIL-800H
Travel Direction Lead Wire: 0°Drag Travel Direction Trail Wire: 15°Push Angle
Single or Multiple Arc: Multiple (Tandem Arc) Weld first side of joint, flip plate and weld side 2.
Rg = 0
Single or Multipass: Single
In. Wire Side Layer Pass In’s ipm In. A V In. ipm In.
WPS No.:
Welding Procedure Data __________________________
Welding Process: SAW Electrode Type: Metal Cored Flux: Lincoln MIL-800H
Travel Direction Lead Wire: 15°Drag Travel Direction Trail Wire: 0°Angle
In. Wire Side Layer Pass In’s ipm In. A V In. ipm In.
WPS No.:
Welding Procedure Data __________________________
Welding Process: SAW Electrode Type: Metal Cored Flux: Lincoln MIL-800H
Travel Direction Lead Wire: 0°Drag Travel Direction Trail Wire: 15°Push Angle
Single or Multiple Arc: Multiple (Tandem Arc) Ө1=70° Included Angle, Ө2=90° Included Angle, Rg = 0, Rf = 5/16,
E1=7/16, E2=1/4
Single or Multipass: Single
In. Wire Side Layer Pass In’s ipm In. A V In. ipm In.
APPENDIX G
UT REPORTS
Ultrasonic Examination of Welds Transducer: AWS0256 2.25 MHz 70o July 24 2008
Project: ____6134______________________________ 70o Side 1
Weld Identification: 36-DS-1______________________
Material & Thickness: ____1 inch__________________
Weld Joint Identification:_________________________
680 mm long
Weld Process: ___SAW__________________________ o
Quality Requirements: Section # ABS Guide for NDT_ 60
Side 2
Remarks: Calibration on DSC block, inspected as
AWS D1.1 cyclically loaded non-tubular structural weld. Scanned at +20 dB from both sides of weld, only rejectable reflectors
reported.
Attenuation Factor
Indication Rating
Indication Level
Angular Distance
Line Number
Discontinuity
Sound Path
Evaluation
Length
“A”
Distance
Remarks
From
(All distances are in millimetres)
a b c d X Y
1 No rejectable reflectors found
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Attenuation Factor “c”: subtract 25.4 mm from the sound path distance and divide the remainder by 12.7
Ultrasonic Examination of Welds Transducer: AWS0256 2.25 MHz 70o July 24 2008
Project: ____6134______________________________ CJP Side 1
Weld Identification: 36-DS-1/2____________________
Material & Thickness: ____1/2 inch__________________
Weld Joint Identification:_________________________
623 mm long
Weld Process: ___SAW__________________________ Side 2
Quality Requirements: Section # ABS Guide for NDT_
Remarks: Calibration on DSC block, inspected as
AWS D1.1 cyclically loaded non-tubular structural weld. Scanned at +20 dB from both sides of weld, only rejectable reflectors
reported.
Attenuation Factor
Indication Rating
Indication Level
Angular Distance
Line Number
Discontinuity
Sound Path
Evaluation
Length
“A”
Distance
Remarks
From
(All distances are in millimetres)
a b c d X Y
1 No reportable reflectors found
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Attenuation Factor “c”: subtract 25.4 mm from the sound path distance and divide the remainder by 12.7
Ultrasonic Examination of Welds Transducer: AWS0256 2.25 MHz 70o July 24 2008
Project: ____6134______________________________ 50o Side 1
Weld Identification: 65-OSW-1/2____________________
Material & Thickness: ____1/2 inch__________________
Weld Joint Identification:_________________________ 3 mm
623 mm long
Weld Process: ___SAW__________________________ Welded from Side 1
Quality Requirements: Section # ABS Guide for NDT_
Remarks: Calibration on DSC block, inspected as
AWS D1.1 cyclically loaded non-tubular structural weld. Scanned at +20 dB from both sides of the weld, only rejectable reflectors
reported.
Attenuation Factor
Indication Rating
Indication Level
Angular Distance
Line Number
Discontinuity
Sound Path
Evaluation
Length
“A”
Distance
Remarks
From
(All distances are in millimetres)
a b c d X Y
1 1 70 2 +3.7 57.0 2 +2 28 53 7.3 320 -19 This reflector is 8 mm outside weld
zone in base metal.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Attenuation Factor “c”: subtract 25.4 mm from the sound path distance and divide the remainder by 12.7
Ultrasonic Examination of Welds Transducer: AWS0256 2.25 MHz 70o July 24 2008
Project: ____6134______________________________ 70o Side 1
Weld Identification: 65-DS-1______________________
Material & Thickness: ____1 inch__________________
Weld Joint Identification:_________________________
680 mm long
Weld Process: ___SAW__________________________
Quality Requirements: Section # ABS Guide for NDT_ 60o
Side 2
Remarks: Calibration on DSC block, inspected as
AWS D1.1 cyclically loaded non-tubular structural weld. Scanned at +20 dB from both sides of weld, only rejectable reflectors
reported.
Attenuation Factor
Indication Rating
Reference Level
Indication Number
Angular Distance
Line Number
Discontinuity
Sound Path
Evaluation
Length
“A”
Distance
Remarks
From
(All distances are in millimetres)
a b c d X Y
1 No rejectable reflectors found
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Attenuation Factor “c”: subtract 25.4 mm from the sound path distance and divide the remainder by 12.7
Ultrasonic Examination of Welds Transducer: AWS0256 2.25 MHz 70o July 24 2008
Project: ____6134______________________________ CJP Side 1
Weld Identification: 65-DS-1/2____________________
Material & Thickness: ____1/2 inch__________________
Weld Joint Identification:_________________________
623 mm long
Weld Process: ___SAW__________________________ Side 2
Quality Requirements: Section # ABS Guide for NDT_
Remarks: Calibration on DSC block, inspected as
AWS D1.1 cyclically loaded non-tubular structural weld. Scanned at +20 dB from both sides of the weld, only rejectable reflectors
reported.
Attenuation Factor
Indication Rating
Indication Level
Angular Distance
Line Number
Discontinuity
Sound Path
Evaluation
Length
“A”
Distance
Remarks
From
(All distances are in millimetres)
a b c d X Y
1 No reportable reflectors found
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Attenuation Factor “c”: subtract 25.4 mm from the sound path distance and divide the remainder by 12.7
APPENDIX H
APPENDIX I
APPENDIX J
APPENDIX K
HARDNESS RESULTS
APPENDIX L
APPENDIX M