This rubric outlines the key elements and formatting requirements for a lab report following the IMRaD format. It evaluates sections on the introduction, methods, results, and discussion on elements such as stating objectives and hypotheses, describing procedures and materials, presenting and analyzing data, and drawing appropriate conclusions. Adherence to APA style guidelines and maintenance of a thorough lab notebook are also assessed. Scores on each section are multiplied based on the quality of data in the lab notebook, with poor records reducing the overall grade and exemplary records increasing the grade earned.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
82 views4 pages
AP Lab Report Rubric
This rubric outlines the key elements and formatting requirements for a lab report following the IMRaD format. It evaluates sections on the introduction, methods, results, and discussion on elements such as stating objectives and hypotheses, describing procedures and materials, presenting and analyzing data, and drawing appropriate conclusions. Adherence to APA style guidelines and maintenance of a thorough lab notebook are also assessed. Scores on each section are multiplied based on the quality of data in the lab notebook, with poor records reducing the overall grade and exemplary records increasing the grade earned.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
AP Lab Report Rubric
IMRaD format 5-4 3 2 1-0
Introduction: Background Introduction is thorough, connecting
the material of the course to the and Objectives activity of the lab. The introduction provides the reader with key terms. Appropriate, properly formatted citations are provided. The underlying scientific concept of the lab mentioned and is clearly explained.
Introduction: Research Research Question is stated
Question/Hypothesis Rationale is provided for question. Testable Hypothesis is stated and is justified clearly in an “If...then…” format specifically predicting the relationship between dependent and independent variables that may be supported or rejected. Independent and dependent variables are specific and measurable.. Background research supports the manipulation of variables and indicates that manipulation will address the hypothesis or research question.
Methods: Materials Materials list is complete (according
to lab report guidelines including if possible size, concentration, and quantity). Concentration of chemical reagents used (when known), scientific names of organisms are named, volumes of apparatus, etc. are provided.
Methods: Procedure Procedure is concisely written using
third person past tense. There is an acceptable range of variance in the independent variable. Constants are clearly identified. Control group is identified. Labeled Diagram or photo is provided. Validity measures are addressed. The procedure allows for the collection of “sufficient relevant data” The protocol states that data will be combined (if necessary). Procedure is safe and ethical. At least one, properly formatted citation is provided.
Results: Data Collection Clearly describes how raw data were
calculated and organized for analysis. Raw data is recorded. Processed data is recorded. Both quantitative data and qualitative data are recorded. Data adheres to precision guidelines. Units are present on quantitative data. Results: Data Presentation Report includes at least one graph and two data tables (raw data and processed data) All tables, graphs, drawings, and calculations adhere to lab report guidelines (titles, labels, units present) Relevant statistical analysis of data is demonstrated. Calculations are clearly demonstrated. Data are summarized in a clear, concise, logical manner. Patterns are identified & described, but no conclusions drawn.
Discussion: Conclusions Conclusion is based on reasonable
interpretation of data. Clear connection is made between hypothesis and data collected. Clear connection is made between the lab activity and the understandings of the course. Discussion of limitations of the experiment is provided. Discussion of unexpected results is provided (when applicable). Applicability of the conclusions of this experiment to other situations is provided. Discussion: Experimental Statement of confidence in the experiment is provided and justified. Evaluation Measures to ensure validity are discussed. Recommendations for refining the experiment are provided. Identification and discussion of sources of error is provided. Specific recommendations to address identified weaknesses are provided.
grammar, and consistent design considerations (formatting, spacing, etc.)
Report adheres to APA citation
conventions in-text and in the reference section.
Report is shared correctly, posted
publicly on course blog correctly, and posted in a timely fashion.
Lab Notebook Data The quality and accuracy of your
Verification lab data serves as a score multiplier for your overall grade, ranging from .9 at the low end, to 1.1 at the high end. In other words, if you keep poor records, it can cost you up to 10% of your total grade earned. Likewise, keeping exemplary records in your lab notebook can earn you an additional 10% on your score.