About The Finite Element Analysis For Beam-Hinged Frame
About The Finite Element Analysis For Beam-Hinged Frame
Key words: structural simulation, DOFs coupling, DOFs condensation, finite element method
Abstract: In this paper, the method of DOFs condensation is adopted to simulate hinge node in
finite element analysis. Other than adding additional overlapped nodes for the DOFs coupling
method, the principle idea of DOFs condensation method is that each two elements connected by a
hinge node do have a common node, which is exactly the hinge node, while the non-constrained
DOFs of the hinge node would be condensed into the other constrained DOFs of the element. The
procedure of condensation is much like the condensation of sub-structures. The detailed condensed
stiffness matrices for beam elements is derived in this paper. A numerical example for a hinged
frame is presented. The validity of the present theory would be demonstrated by comparing the
present result and that of ABAQUS software.
Introduction
As a connection mode, hinge is widely used in structural engineering, especially for frame
structures. In commercial software, such as ABAQUS, the most usually method to simulate hinge
node is the coupling of degrees of freedom, or DOFs coupling for simplicity. Its principle idea is
that each two elements connected by a hinge node don’t have a common node while have two
overlapped nodes. The two elements are connected by adding constraint equations for the two
overlapped nodes. In other words, additional element nodes, or degree of freedom (DOF), would be
introduced into the finite element model to simulate the hinge node.
In this paper, the method of DOFs condensation [1-6] is adopted to simulate hinge node in
finite element analysis. Other than adding additional overlapped nodes for the DOFs coupling
method, the principle idea of DOFs condensation method is that each two elements connected by a
hinge node do have a common node, which is exactly the hinge node, while the non-constrained
DOFs of the hinge node would be condensed into the other constrained DOFs of the element. The
procedure of condensation is much like the condensation of sub-structures. The detailed condensed
stiffness matrices for beam elements is derived in this paper. A numerical example for a hinged
frame is presented. The validity of the present theory would be demonstrated by comparing the
present result and that of ABAQUS software.
K ea e = P e (1)
torsional angle, denoted as ai . The latter one usually represents the axial and lateral displacement,
denoted as ab . Decomposing the stiffness matrix K and load vector P according to that of
displacement vector a e , Equation (1) could be transformed into the following one:
K bb K bi ab Pb
=
K K ii ai Pi
(2)
ib
From the second line of above equation, the following could be derived:
ai = K ii−1 ( Pi − K ibab ) (3)
Substituting Equation (2) into Equation (2), the condensed equation could be obtained as
following:
Where
K *bb = K bb − K bi K ii−1K ib (6)
Generally speaking, the stiffness matrix K for a 3d beam element could be represented as
following [1,2]:
(8)
232
Advances in Engineering Research (AER), volume 143
Where I y and I z represent the principle moment of inertia, J represents the torsional moment
of inertia
Substituting Equation (8) into Equation (6), the stiffness matrix for all kinds of hinged-beam
element could be deduced. For example, the stiffness matrix for one lateral displacement angle
hinge could be represented as Equation (9), and the matrix for two lateral displacement angle hinge
could be represented as Equation (9), and the matrix for three dimension angle hinge (3D hinge)
could be represented as Equation (10).
Here it should be pointed out that in coding program the condensation from Equation (2) to
Equation (5) is not according to the Equation (4) while according to the Gauss-Jordan elimination
method [2,7].
(9)
(10)
233
Advances in Engineering Research (AER), volume 143
(11)
Numerical example
To demonstrate the above theory, a numerical example is presented in the following. The
original configuration and deformation of a right-angle-frame with a 3D hinge is shown in Figure 1.
The cross-section of the frame is a circle with a 9mm inner radius and 11mm outer radius. Its
Young’s modulus is 2.0e11 Pa and its Poisson ratio is 0.3. The lateral rod is subjected a 1KN
vertical concentrated load and the vertical rod is subjected a 3KN lateral concentrated load, see
Figure 1. The deformation from the present method, i.e. DOFs condensation method, and from the
ABAQUS software, i.e. DOFs coupling, are presented simultaneously in Figure 1. It is obvious that
the result of the present method is identical with that of ABQUS software.
hinged node
0
1KN
fixed node
-1
axis-y (m)
3KN
the present result
-2
result by ANSYS
the original configuration
fixed node
-3
0 1 2 3 4 5
axis-x (m)
234
Advances in Engineering Research (AER), volume 143
Summary
In this paper, the method of DOFs condensation is adopted to simulate hinge node in finite
element analysis. Other than adding additional overlapped nodes for the DOFs coupling method, the
principle idea of DOFs condensation method is that each two elements connected by a hinge node
do have a common node, which is exactly the hinge node, while the non-constrained DOFs of the
hinge node would be condensed into the other constrained DOFs of the element. The procedure of
condensation is much like the condensation of sub-structures. The detailed condensed stiffness
matrices for beam elements is derived in this paper. A numerical example for a hinged frame is
presented. The validity of the present theory would be demonstrated by comparing the present result
and that of ABAQUS software.
References
[1] Bathe K J. Finite Element Procedures. NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996
[2] Wang X C. Finite Element Method. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press, 2003 (in Chinese)
[3] Oden J T. Finite Element of Nonliear Continua. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972
[4] Simo J C, Hughes T J R. Computational Inelasticity. New York: Springer, 1998
[5] Belytschko T, Liu W K, Moran B. Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures. New York: Wiley,
2000
[6] Yang Y B, Kuo S R. Theory & Analysis of Nonlinear Framed Structures. New York: Prentice Hall, 1994
[7] Guan Z & Chen J L. Numerical Computation Method. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press, 1990 (in
Chinese)
235