Scribd
Upload
210 views

Automated Faculty Evaluation System Using PHP and mySQL

The document describes an automated faculty evaluation system that aims to make the faculty evaluation process paperless and more efficient. The key features of the system include allowing students to evaluate faculty online, automatically calculating results, and generating reports. The system will reduce time spent on manual evaluation and ensure evaluation results are securely stored. It is comprised of modules for administration, students, and faculty with functions like adding/removing users, rating faculty, viewing feedback, and accessing evaluation results.

Uploaded by

Hasnat Akbar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
210 views

Automated Faculty Evaluation System Using PHP and mySQL

The document describes an automated faculty evaluation system that aims to make the faculty evaluation process paperless and more efficient. The key features of the system include allowing students to evaluate faculty online, automatically calculating results, and generating reports. The system will reduce time spent on manual evaluation and ensure evaluation results are securely stored. It is comprised of modules for administration, students, and faculty with functions like adding/removing users, rating faculty, viewing feedback, and accessing evaluation results.

Uploaded by

Hasnat Akbar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Automated Faculty Evaluation System

Session :( )

Group Members

&

BCS

Supervisor

Department of Computer Science


University of Science and Technology
1.1 Abstract
Automated Faculty Evaluation System will give effortless gathering and more accurate data
analysis of faculty evaluation in lesser time. This system is paperless process in which the
evaluator (students, co-teacher, and supervisor) will use the computer to evaluate the teacher
instead of manual. Its purpose is to let your faculty know the effectiveness of the class in
teaching the intended material and value in facilitating your learning using automated faculty
evaluation system for it is designed to identify teaching strength and weaknesses. But with the
rapid growth of students now a days, manual evaluation is causing hard time to the Data Analyst
of Quality Enhancement Cell (QEC) to collect all the results of the said evaluation that’s why
automated faculty evaluation system is being proposed. To secure the system we will be using
PHP Framework that includes security features and form validation.

1.2 Automated Teacher Evaluation System


Automated teacher evaluation system can rate their faculty on basis of questions provided by
administration and also student can give their comment and feedback to that particular faculty. In
admin side admin can add or delete faculty and student. Admin can add the list of questions to
decide the performance of faculty. Admin also give rating to the faculty according to the
question list and performance. Faculty can view their result based on student, co-teachers and
admin rating. Faculty can view any comment or feedback given by their students. Faculty can
give rating to the co-teacher’s based on question provided by administration. Teaching
performance evaluation is a necessary step in ensuring good instruction. Traditionally teaching
performance evaluation is used as a tool to apprise faculty on how they are doing their job.
Performance is defined as a set of outcomes produce during a certain period of time, and does
not refer to the traits, personal characteristics or competencies of the performer. Faculty’s
evaluation is widely understood to the most effective tool to improve the quality of instruction in
Universities and colleges. Timely and accurate information is useful in virtually every stage of
the decision-making process. Problem are identified when information reveals that some aspect
of performance can be place in the hands of decision makers.
1.3 Purpose

The main purpose this system is to make more accurate assessment and reduce the use of papers.

A list of purpose of the system has written bellow:

 To efficiently evaluate the teacher thorough a fully automated evaluation system, not
only saves a lot of time but also give fast and accurate results.
 The Super Admin can enlist the departmental admin and departmental admin can enlist
the teachers and students.
 Time effective system.
 Student will login into the system and evaluate their course teachers.
 Result will be automatically calculated.

1.4 Objectives:

 To reduce time spent in administering of questionnaire to respondents.


 To secure the results of faculty evaluation.
 To generate accurate results.
 To produce on time reports.
 To convert the manual process of faculty evaluation into a computerized faculty
evaluation system.
 This system can be used in schools, colleges and in Higher Education institutions

1.5 Existing System


The Existing System to evaluate is manual. An OMR Sheet is provided to the student and
student fill the teacher’s code, course code etc. Then the fill their answer of the provided
MCQ questions about the course teacher or instructor based on how the course teacher
maintain and teach the course. And then manually go through the answer sheet and manually
calculate the points. We think it is too long process and time consuming.
1.5.1 Disadvantages of the Existing System.

 The existing system is very time consuming.


 It is difficult to analyze the result manually.
 The manual calculation of the result may go wrong.
 Extra pressure for the authority.

1.6 Objective of the Proposed System.


This system allows the Super Admin or we can say super admins as the central admin who can
add, edit and delete the departmental admins. Departmental Admin can add, edit and delete
teachers, students and courses. Teachers can see the result of his evaluation only. Student will
evaluate their course teachers.
The main objective of the Automated Teachers Evaluation System is that it can be used in
educational institutions to provide automated and more accurate experience of evaluating their
course teachers. It reduces the time consumption and workload that exist in the current manual
system.

1.7 Advantages of Automated Faculty Evaluation System

 Reduce the time.


 Result is accurate.
 Time flexible.
 User-friendly interface.
 Easily Accessible.
 Secure because of authentication.
UML Diagrams
The full meaning of UML is Unified Modelling Language. UML is a standardized general
purpose modelling language in the field of software engineering. It is used to modify, visualize,
construct, specify and document the artifacts of an object-oriented system under development.

Use Case Diagram

Figure 1: Use case Diagram of Automated Faculty Evaluation System

1.8 Features

The system comprises of 3 major modules with their sub-modules as follows:


1.8.1 Administration Module:

 Login:
Admin login to the system with valid username and password.
 Student:
Admin keeps all the important information of students and perform following Functions
1)Add Student: Admin can add new student record to the system with their valid
personal details.
2)Update Student: Admin can update the existing personal details of students.
3)Delete Student: Admin have authority to remove data of particular student from
system.

 Faculty:
Admin keeps all the important information of students and perform following Functions
1)Add Faculty: Admin can add new Faculty to the system with their valid personal
details.
2)Update Faculty: Admin can update the record of personal details of faculty.
3)Delete Faculty: Admin have authority to remove data of particular Faculty from
system.
 Question:
The list of questions to decide the performance of faculty inserted by admin.
 Rating:
Admin also give rating to the faculty according to the question list and performance.

 Report:
The performance reports for individual faculty can be generated and print only by admin.

1.8.2 Student Module:

 Login:
Student login to the system with valid username and password provided by admin.
 Rating:
Student can give rating to the faculty basis on question provided by administration.
 Comment/Feedback:
Student can post comment for their faculty.

1.8.3 Faculty Module:

 Login:
Teacher login to the system with valid username and password provided by admin.

 Performance Result:
Faculty can view their result based on student, co-teachers and admin rating.
 View Comment/Feedback:
Faculty can view any comment or feedback given by their students.
 Rating:
Faculty can give rating to the Co-teachers basis on question provided by administration.

1.9 Hardware Requirement:


 i3 Processor Based Computer or higher
 Memory: 1 GB RAM
 Hard Drive: 50 GB
 Monitor

1.10 Software Requirement:


 Windows 7 or higher
 WAMP Server
 Notepad++.
 My SQL 5.6.
 PHP

You might also like