Republic v. Sarenogon

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Republic v.

Sarenogon
G.R. No. 199194 February 10, 2016 Ponente: Mariano C. TOPIC:
Del Castillo Subsequent
Marriage,
upon
reappearance
of absent
spouse
Recit Summary:

Facts:

Respondent Sarenogon filed a Petition for the declaration of presumptive death of his wife
Netchie before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Ozamis. Netchie went to Hongkong as a
domestic helper. For three (3) months, he did not receive any communication from Netchie
and had no idea of her whereabouts. He tried to contact Netchie’s parents, but failed. He
likewise inquired from Netchie’s relatives and friends, but they also do not know where she
was. Because of these, he had to presume that his wife Netchie was already dead. He filed the
Petition so he could contract another marriage. The RTC held that Jose had established by
preponderance of evidence that he is entitled to relief prayed for under Article 41 of the Family
Code. It found that Netchie had disappeared for more than four years, reason enough to
conclude that his wife was indeed already dead.

Republic through the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), elevated the judgment of the RTC
to the CA, however, it perceived no error to the RTC’s judgment.

Issue: Dispositive:

Whether or not the alleged efforts of the WHEREFORE, the Petition is GRANTED.
respondent to locate his wife sufficiently The decision of the Court of Appeals is
supports a well-founded belief that his absent REVERSED and SET ASIDE.
wife is probably dead.
Held:

No. The mere absence of the spouse or lack of news that such absentee is still alive, failure to
communicate by the absentee spouse would not suffice. The Family Code places upon the
present spouse the burden of proving the additional and more stringent requirement of “well-
founded belief” which can only be discharged upon a due showing of proper and honest-to-
goodness inquiries and efforts to ascertain not only the absent spouse’s whereabouts but,
more importantly, that the absent spouse is either still alive or is already dead.

If anything, Jose’s pathetically anemic efforts to locate the missing Netchie are notches below
the required degree of stringent diligence prescribed by jurisprudence. Jose did not call to the
witness stand specific individuals or persons whom he allegedly saw or met in the course of
his search for the allegedly missing Netchie. Neither did he prove that he sought the
assistance of the pertinent government agencies as well as the media.

You might also like