Usp 44
Usp 44
Usp 44
FD
= accumulated destruction
t1 = process start time
t2
= process end time
T = temperature at each time increment
Δt = time interval between temperature measurements
Summing the instantaneous temperature contributions over the entire depyrogenation
process allows for the calculation of
the overall process efficacy or FD delivered over the course of the process. Many
commercial data loggers are equipped with
software that enables them to make this calculation and integrate the total FD
accumulated during a process. The FD calculation
is used during initial validation, validation maintenance, and change control. The
mathematical principles of the FD calculation
are essentially the same as those used to calculate lethality (F0) values in moist heat
sterilization. FD values are used to confirm
process consistency over time as correlation to endotoxin destruction is rarely possible.
VALIDATION
Because dry heat depyrogenation is appropriate only for heat stable materials, a high
margin for safety is always attainable.
Times and temperatures used for the purpose of destroying challenge materials can result
in extreme challenges to material
integrity and stability. Attention to depyrogenation processes, including an understanding
of the resident endotoxin load on
incoming materials and reduction to levels needed to assure patient safety, should take
place during drug product development,
prior to validation.
Equipment Qualification
Equipment Qualification (EQ) is a predefined program that focuses on the processing
equipment to confirm that it has been
properly installed and operates as intended prior to evaluation of the process. In some
companies, EQ may be separated into
installation qualification (IQ) and operational qualification (OQ), or combined together
under a joint terminology of installation operational qualification (I/OQ). Equipment
qualification provides a baseline for preventive maintenance and change control
assuring reproducibility of equipment operation over time.
Empty Chamber Temperature Distribution for Ovens
The oven should be evaluated for empty chamber temperature distribution. This is
assessed by measurement of temperature
at each corner of oven, near the controlling probe(s) and other locations as justified.
Differences in the cycle dwell period can
be discounted in this evaluation, as only the shortest dwell period need be evaluated. The
evaluation is best performed over
the last few minutes of the dwell period once the system has fully stabilized. The
acceptance criteria for this test vary with the
oven’s design and operating conditions; however, temperature distribution is typically
substantially less uniform than observed
in autoclaves and may be ±15° or more. Depyrogenation ovens that are located at floor
level may have even greater ranges in
temperature. The temperature distribution measurement may be of value in the evaluation
of changes to the oven.
Empty Temperature Distribution in Tunnels
While these studies are often done, they are actually of limited value. Unloaded
depyrogenation tunnels will always produce
far more variability in temperature distribution than will a fully loaded tunnel. Therefore,
for depyrogenation tunnels,
temperature studies under fully loaded conditions only are indicated. Important to the
proper operation of the dry heat tunnel
is the establishment of the required air flow balance between the tunnel and the adjoining
areas. Improper air flow can cause
uneven heating across the load being processed. The temperature distribution
measurement may be of value in the evaluation
of changes to the tunnel.
Component Mapping
The ability of dry heat to penetrate load items and to bring them to the required
temperature should be determined.
Load items that are complex, of significant mass, with enclosed volumes and product
contact surfaces that must be
depyrogenated, should be subjected to component mapping to determine internal cold
spots. All load items should be
prepared, wrapped (if that is the practice), and oriented in a manner consistent with how
they will be processed. Glass typically
enters the depyrogenation process (whether tunnel or oven) wet and must be evaluated
wet to properly determine the effect
on overall thermal input. Mapping of glass components to be processed in tunnels is not
necessary; all monitoring of
temperature in tunnels is accomplished with probes in contact with the bottom of the
container.
Load Mapping in Ovens
Fixed loading patterns are necessary in oven depyrogenation because of the limited heat
capacity of the air; fully packed
conditions because of their greater mass ordinarily result in the best process temperature
uniformity. Load mapping assures
that items placed throughout the load attain the desired depyrogenation conditions.
Identification of cold zones within the
oven should be established during depyrogenation cycle development. Information from
the load mapping is used to adjust
cycle timing to assure appropriate efficacy across the entire load. It may be possible to
validate maximum and minimum loads
(as determined by either the number of items or their mass).
F D is calculated from the temperature data at all monitored locations within the load
pattern.
Load Mapping in Tunnels
Load mapping can be assessed using sets of calibrated sensors (i.e., trailing or wireless
temperature sensors) positioned within
the glass pack as it moves through the tunnel. Temperature sensors should be placed into
direct contact with the glass item at
the bottom of the container. Temperature measurements should be made on the leading
edge, the middle (highest density),
and the trailing edge of the glass pack across the width of the conveyor belt. There should
be NLT 5 temperature sensors
positioned across the belt in each section of the load. FD is calculated from the
temperature data at all monitored locations.
Studies should be performed using all container sizes to determine the lowest FD
locations. The FD results can be used to support
the selection of containers/conditions to be evaluated in the confirmation studies (see
below). There is no requirement to
perform temperature heat distribution measurements during these studies.
Confirmation of Depyrogenation
The materials/glass components to be depyrogenated should be assessed for their
incoming endotoxin content prior to the
validation study. This would include glass as received and immediately after washing. All
tested materials should be handled
and prepared using defined procedures. Materials and glass prepared in the same manner
are used in the depyrogenation
validation studies. The addition of challenge material to the load items, including a
requirement to demonstrate a 3-log
reduction, may not be required if time and temperature studies consistently indicate that
depyrogenation conditions are met.
Temperature monitoring as described above must be done simultaneously with the
depyrogenation confirmation studies. The
confirmation studies should be performed at reduced time-temperature conditions from
those utilized in routine processing
and deliver lower FD results when compared to those determined in the mapping studies
and are considered “worst case”
confirmation of depyrogenation process efficacy. There is no requirement to perform
temperature heat distribution
measurements during these studies.
OVENS
A minimum of five (5) samples should be taken in proximity at NLT 10 temperature-
monitored locations (including those
determined to be the coldest from the oven load mapping study) in the oven and tested for
endotoxin content post-processing.
The process is considered acceptable if the amount of endotoxin per sample is NMT 0.1
EU.
TUNNELS
A minimum of five (5) samples should be taken in proximity to each monitored position
within the tunnel load (including
those determined to be the coldest from the tunnel load mapping study) and tested for
endotoxin content post-processing.
The process is considered acceptable if the amount of endotoxin per sample is NMT 0.1
EU.
ROUTINE PROCESS CONTROL
As with all processes, after the dry heat depyrogenation process has been validated, it
must be subject to ongoing controls
that maintain it within the validated state at all times. Temperature and exposure time,
which are the important dry heat
depyrogenation parameters, can be used to confirm performance on a routine basis.
Where direct assessment of FD is not
possible, assuring that the temperature and exposure time conditions were met results in
an equivalent confidence that the
depyrogenation system operated in a validated state of control.
Depyrogenation á1228ñ details the general practices that are appropriate for all
depyrogenation systems. This is accomplished
by a number of related practices that are essential for the continued use of the process
over an extended period of time. The
essential practices to maintain validated status include calibration, physical
measurements, periodic endotoxin assessment on
incoming materials, ongoing process control, change control, preventive maintenance,
and periodic reassessment and training.
APPENDIX
Additional Sources of Information
• Tsuji K, Harrison S. Dry heat destruction of lipopolysaccharide: dry heat destruction
kinetics. Appl Environ Microbio. 1978;
36(5):710–714.
• Ludwig J., Avis KE. Dry heat inactivation of endotoxin on the surface of glass. J
Parenteral Sci Technol. 1990; 44(1):4–12.
• Parenteral Drug Association (PDA), technical report 3, Validation of dry heat processes
used for depyrogenation and
sterilization. 2013.
REFERENCES
1. Tsuji K, Lewis A. Dry heat destruction of lipopolysaccharide: a mathematical
approach to process evaluation. Appl Environ
Microbio. 1978; 36(5):715–719.
2. Akers MJ, Ketron KM, Thompson, BR. F value requirements for the destruction of
endotoxin in the validation of dry-heat
sterilization/depyrogenation cycles. J Parenteral Sci Technol. 1982; (36):12–6.
4
Printed on: Wed Aug 11 2021, 06:04:17 PM
(EST)
Official Status: Currently Official on 11-Aug-2021 DocId: 1_GUID-B1C4ACBB-A2C5-
4298-AD66-23570AACBD27_1_en-US
Printed by: Le Tran Official Date: Official as of 01-Aug-2016 Document Type:
GENERAL CHAPTER @2021 USPC
https://online.uspnf.com/uspnf/document/1_GUID-B1C4ACBB-A2C5-4298-AD66-
23570AACBD27_1_en-US 4/4
Official