Reliability and Lifetime of LEDs
Reliability and Lifetime of LEDs
LEDs
Application Note
Published by ams-OSRAM AG
Tobelbader Strasse 30,
8141 Premstaetten Austria
Phone +43 3136 500-0
ams-osram.com
© All rights reserved
Reliability and lifetime of LEDs https://ams-osram.com/https://
ams-osram.com/https://ams-os-
Abstract
This application note provides a fundamental insight into the topics of “reliability” and “lifetime”. The terms
lifetime and reliability are explained in further detail with respect to light emitting diodes (LEDs) and how
these terms are understood by ams-OSRAM AG. In addition, important factors which influence the lifetime
and reliability of LEDs are described. The appendix provides descriptions of the mathematical foundations
that are needed in practice.
Table of contents
1 Introduction............................................................................................................ 3
2 The concept of reliability at ams-OSRAM AG ..................................................... 4
3 Reliability of LEDs ................................................................................................. 4
3.1 Extrinsic reliability period ................................................................................... 5
3.2 Intrinsic reliability period .................................................................................... 6
4 Validation and confirmation of reliability and lifetime ..................................... 12
5 On-site support regarding reliability and lifetime............................................. 14
6 Appendix .............................................................................................................. 14
6.1 Fundamentals — definition of terms................................................................ 14
6.2 Failure rate ...................................................................................................... 15
6.3 Distributions for reliability analysis................................................................... 17
1 Introduction
With the increasing complexity of technical equipment, modules or even individual components,
the aspects of reliability and lifetime and thus the costs involved with exchange and revision
become increasingly more important for the customer. Here, one must consider an optimization
between requirements, functions and costs over the lifetime of the product.
The single requirement that the device will not fail is no longer sufficient for modern, powerful
components or devices. More often, it is additionally expected that they perform their required
functions without failure. However, it is only possible to make a prognosis (probability) supported
by statistics and experiments as to what extent such requirements can be fulfilled. A direct
answer or statement as to whether an individual device or component will operate without failure
for a certain period of time cannot be given.
Nowadays, modern methods of quality management and reliability modeling are used in order to
investigate and verify these types of questions.
ams-OSRAM AG associates the term reliability with the fulfillment of customer expectations over
the expected lifetime. In other words, the LED does not fail during its lifetime under the given
environmental and functional conditions. The reliability of the products is thus based on the chain
of the materials, the manufacturing process and the function of the component (Figure 1). In
addition, the final application must also be taken into consideration.
High reliability can only be achieved if the changing effects and interdependencies of the
individual components are already taken into account during the development phase.
Neglecting this entirely or only focusing on one or two elements leads to a reduction in the quality
of the product and thus, to a decrease in reliability.
Material
Function
Process
3 Reliability of LEDs
The reliability of a semiconductor element is the property that states how reliable a function
assigned to the product is fulfilled within a period of time. It is subject to a stochastic process and
is described by the probability of survival R(t).
A fault or failure is indicated if the component can no longer fulfill the functionality assigned to it.
1. Early failures
3. Wear-out period
Since the failure rate is especially high at the beginning and end of the product cycle, the failure
rate over time takes the form of a “bathtub” curve (Figure 2). Thereby each single failure
mechanism exhibits its own chronological progression and shows therefore an individual bath-
tub curve.
For each of these phases, many different types of definitions, analysis methods and
mathematical formulas for reliability can be found in the literature. The most important definitions
and methods which apply to LEDs are described in this section and in the appendix.
1. 2. 3.
Time
For the sake of simplicity, the first two phases are combined into a so-called “extrinsic reliability
period”. The third phase, the wear-out period, is correspondingly designated as the “intrinsic
reliability period”.
As a rule, an experimental determination of the middle failure rate is extremely difficult. For this
reason, ams-OSRAM AG uses the SN 29500 standard from Siemens AG, which incorporates
the experience of failures in the field into the typical failure rates for LEDs (Figure 3). In the
process, no distinction is made in regard to the cause of the individual failures.
Figure 3: LED failure rate in the extrinsic period according to Siemens Standard SN29500
12
Random failure rate λ [FIT]
SN 29500-12 (2008)
10 for large power packages
0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Time [h]
During operation, LEDs experience a gradual decrease in luminous flux, measured in Lumens.
As a rule, this is accelerated by the operating current and temperature of the LED and also
appears when the LED is driven within specifications (Figure 4).
The term “Lumen maintenance” (L) is used in connection with the degradation of light in LEDs.
This describes the remaining luminous flux over time, with respect to the original luminous flux
of the LED.
As a rule, the failure criterion is determined by the application. Typical values are 50 % (L50) or
70 % (L70), depending on the market of the LED product.
100
Relative light output [%]
90
80
70
L70
60 100
00
50
40
30
20
10
0
1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000
Time [h]
Since aging is based on a change in the material properties and is therefore subject to statistical
processes, the lifetime values also are based on a statistical distribution.
The percentage of components that have failed is described by the term “mortality” (B). A value
of B50 thus describes the point in time at which 50 % of the components have failed. This value
is generally specified as typical median lifetime, t50 or tml, for LEDs. In addition to the median
value (B50), a value can also be specified when 10 % of the components have failed (B10 value).
This allows one to draw a conclusion about the width of the lifetime distribution (Figure 5).
99 %
Cumulated failure distribution
90 %
50 %
B50
16 %
10 %
B10
1%
0.1 %
100 ppm
10 ppm
1 ppm
t10 t50
Similar to conventional lights, the reliability and lifetime of LED light sources are also dependent
on various factors, or can be influenced by these factors. The most important physical influencing
factors include humidity, temperature, current and voltage, mechanical forces, chemicals and
light radiation (Figure 6).
Humidity
Temperature
Chemicals
LED Reliability
Light
Mechanical forces
Current and voltage
These can even lead, in a worst case situation, to a total failure or influence the aging
characteristics in the long term (e.g. brightness), and thus produce a change in the reliability and
lifetime. Such direct influencing factors are the temperature and resulting junction temperature
Tj(unction) of the LED, for example, but the amount of current used to drive the LED is also an
influencing factor. Under otherwise equal operating conditions, an increase in the ambient
temperature as well as an increase in current produces an increase in the junction temperature.
In general, however, an increase in junction temperature brings about a decrease in lifetime
(Figure 7).
Figure 7: Dependence of lifetime on the junction temperature and solder point temperature
80,000
70,000
TS TJ
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
IF = 1000 mA / L70/B10
10,000
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Temperature [°C]
Another direct influencing factor is mechanical force. If large mechanical forces are applied to
the LED, for example, this generally results in damage which can additionally lead to total failure
of the LED. The origin of the individual factors can be found in different areas such as LED
design, LED processing, the customer application and the environment and from there, can be
traced back to various aspects and parameters (Figure 8). If these four areas are examined in
more detail, it can be determined that three of the four areas can be directly influenced by the
LED manufacturer or the user. The last area, the environment, ultimately cannot be changed and
must be considered as a given in the application.
For example, the source of the influencing factor, temperature, can be assigned to two areas:
LED design and the customer application. In the area of LED design, the source of the
temperature influence lies both with the electrical parameters and with the transfer of heat.
Reliability
Assembly Envirnonment
• storage condition • ambient temperature
• soldering process • temperature cycles
• handling (pick & place; • humidity
ESD) • pollution
• light radiation
Depending on the current applied (IF) and the associated voltage (UF), a power dissipation is
created, which to a large extent, is converted into heat. This leads to an increase in temperature
in the junction of the LED. The amount of power dissipation is proportional to changes in the
junction temperature.
The proportionality factor is the thermal resistance of the housing (Rth, Junction-Solderpoint) of the
LED. This reflects the heat transfer characteristics of the LED. The lower the thermal resistance
of the LED, the better the thermal properties of the LED become. If heat is transfered efficiently
out of the package, the junction temperature increase is not as high. As an example, two
components with differing Rth values (2.5 and 8 K/W) are examined at the same solder point
temperature TS = 100 °C and the same operating conditions (current) (Figure 9).
The junction temperature of the component with low thermal resistance only increases to
~ 115 °C. In contrast, however, the component with the higher thermal resistance exhibits a
junction temperature of > 144 °C. As mentioned previously, the lifetime of an LED is reduced with
an increase in the junction temperature. At the same solder point temperature, the component
with the lower Rth achieves a longer lifetime than the component with the higher Rth. In addition
to an increased lifetime, lower thermal resistance offers an additional advantage: At the same
solder temperature, a component with a low Rth achieves a higher light output. The reason for
this is the decrease in efficiency of an LED with an increase in junction temperature. For the LED
manufacturer, the influencing factors that have a significant influence on lifetime and reliability
can already be taken into consideration in the development phase.
Figure 9: The dependency of lifetime on temperature due to the influence of various Rth values (example)
110,000
Ts Ts TJ/TJ
100,000
90,000 'TJ-S
80,000
Lifetime [h]
70,000
60,000
50,000 'TJ-S
40,000
30,000
Low Rth High Rth
20,000
Ts TJ Ts TJ
10,000
IF = 1000mA / L70/B10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Temperature [°C]
The impacts of these factors can be reduced through the following measures:
• Robust design
• Stable and optimized production processes in order to minimize the risk of spontaneous
failure
In the area of customer applications, the influencing factor of temperature can be traced back to
heat dissipation. Here, the layout and material of the printed circuit board (PCB) play an
important role.
Summarized under the term “thermal management” which among other things, includes the
selection of an appropriate PCB material (e.g. FR4, IMS), the layout of LEDs, the component
density, additional cooling, etc., the user also has the opportunity to specifically target his
application to accommodate for the influencing factors.
An insufficient thermal management directly leads to a reduction of the reliability and lifetime of
the LED. For more information and an exact description on how the thermal resistance is
determined for the individual packaging types at ams-OSRAM AG please refer to the application
note “Package-related thermal resistance of LEDs”.
However, in general it can be ascertained, that in spite of the high reliability of ams-OSRAM AG
LEDs, only through the consideration of all areas and all changing effects and dependencies a
high overall or system reliability can be achieved.
The following Table 1 shows the list of typically performed tests. In addition, the various test
conditions, the test duration and the stress factors involved are listed.
Based on the internal ams-OSRAM AG qualification specification and the requirements profile,
the selection of the test, the test conditions and test duration can be set.
The mechanical stability of an LED is checked by means of a solder heat resistance test as well
as powered and unpowered temperature cycle tests. Here, the cycle count and the temperature
difference serve as measures of stability. These types of tests are also drawn upon to evaluate
the failure rate.
For proof of reliability, the LEDs undergo individual tests of up to 1000 hours in duration. If the
properties and interactions of the integral parts of the LED are known, results can be taken from
already tested products and applied to other types of LEDs with the same material
characteristics. As a result, the general test scope is reduced, since fewer products must be
tested. This allows the test duration of individual products to be increased to a longer period.
At ams-OSRAM AG, tests sequences are carried out for up to 10,000 hours, for example, in
order to investigate general effects. Individual technology platforms are even evaluated for more
than 35,000 hours.
Table 1: Example reliability test matrix for ams-OSRAM AG LEDs
These types of selective, extremely long-term investigations provide a solid basis for calculation
of the lifetime. According to ams-OSRAM AG, however, the resulting test data should not be
“blindly” extrapolated to determine the average lifetime. Rather, this data should make it possible
to understand why the different materials used behave the way they do.
Statements about lifetime that are based on mathematical results without test data and
background knowledge should generally be viewed with caution.
For further information and questions regarding the lifetime and reliability of particular LED
products, our corresponding sales representatives and/or subsidiaries are available to offer
assistance.
6 Appendix
Reliability R(t) states the probability P, that a system or individual component remains functional
during a time-frame t under normal operating and environmental conditions. In complementary
terms, one speaks of the probability of failure F(t) or unreliability.
Thus, if n components are driven under the same conditions and the number of failures is r(t) at
time t, then the following applies:
r t
F t = --------- = 1 – R t
n
At the beginning, all components function properly (time t = 0) and at some point, they all are
defective. That is,
R t = 0 = 1 and R t = 0
This means that the probability of failure F(t) of a component starts at 0 (0 %) and increases to
1 (100 %) over time — an inverse relation to reliability.
Probability of failure density (failure density)
The failure density f(t) states the probability of a failure at a time t, with respect to a time interval
dt. Mathematically, it represents the derivation of the probability of failure.
dF t PT t dR t
f t = -------------- = --------------------- = – ---------------
dt dt dt
Figure 10: Relation between reliability R(t) and probability of failure F(T)
1 F(t)
Probability
0.5
R(t)
0
t
The failure rate states how many units fail on average within a period of time. Usually, failure
rates are given in units of [1/time unit] such as 1 failure per hour (-1/h).
Due to the low failure rate of electronic components, this is often stated as a FIT:
1 failure
FIT = ----------------------------------------------------------
9
10 component hours
In general, the failure rate is not constant. In many cases, the failure rate usually follows the so-
called “bathtub curve” over the entire component life cycle (Figure 11). The chronological
sequence is comprised of three phases.
Failure rate
λ(t)
Economic life
At the beginning of the product lifetime, a higher failure rate can be observed, which quickly falls
off over time. This phase can be described with a Weibull distribution. This is generally caused
by design defects, weakness in the material, quality fluctuations in production or through
application failures (dimensioning, handling, testing, operation, etc.) or unreal, unconfirmed
failures.
Phase II — with constant failure rate
This phase corresponds to the actual period of economic usefulness. In this phase, the failure
rate is constant and can be described with an exponential or Poisson distribution. Here, failures
mostly appear suddenly and purely at random.
Phase III — wearout failures
In this phase, the failure rate increases at a faster rate due to aging, wearout, fatigue, etc. with
continuous operation. This phase also can be described by a Weibull distribution. With the
representation and interpretation of bathtub curves, it should generally be kept in mind that in
most cases, the curve is only based on a few test points. The mathematical description is
therefore somewhat imprecise, due to deviations and test-related scattering. A reliable
representation is therefore only possible if a statistically large quantity of data has been obtained.
In practice, it can also happen that the time periods of the individual phases are significantly
different. Depending on the complexity of the object and the maturity of the manufacturing
process, the initial failure period may not be present at all or may be characterized by a period
of up to a few thousand hours of operation.
In order to minimize the failure rate, specific preventative measures are already carried out by
ams-OSRAM AG during the development phase as well as in the subsequent manufacturing
phase. In addition, the failure rate is strongly influenced by the predominant operating conditions.
For example, for classic semiconductor elements, the failure rate doubles when the junction
temperature increases by 10 to 20 °C.
Due to its flexibility, the Weibull distribution is well suited to statistical analysis of all types (areas
I to III of the bathtub curve). The primary advantage of this function is that the curve can be
adjusted with the shape parameter b. In this way, a large number of well established fixed-form
distributions (such as normal, log, exponential distributions, etc.) can be realized (Figure 12).
Figure 12: Weibull distribution for various shape parameters b and with a characteristic lifetime of T = 1
Failure density f(t)
lifetime t lifetime t
Failure probability F(t)
Reliability R(t)
lifetime t lifetime t
With a shape parameter b < 1, a decreasing failure rate (area I) is described, with b = 1, a
constant failure rate (area II — exponential distribution) is described and with b > 1, an
increasing failure rate (area III) is described.
In the biparametric form of the Weibull distribution, the probability of failure F(t) and its
complement, reliability R(t), become:
t b
– ----
T
F t = 1 – e ,b>0
t b
– ----
T
Rt = e ,b>0
b t b – 1 , b>0
t = ---
- ----
T T
, where b = shape factor and T = characteristic lifetime.
Exponential distribution
The exponential distribution particularly represents the lifetime distribution in Phase II of the
bathtub curve, the area of random failures. The failure rate is assumed to be constant over time.
Probability of failure:
– t
F t = 1 – e , t 0 and > 0
Reliability:
– t
Rt = e , t 0 and > 0
Failure rate:
1 1
t = = ---- = -----------------
T MTTF
In this area and in connection with irreparable systems, the term MTTF (mean time to failure) is
used to describe to average lifetime.
For a lifetime distribution with a constant failure rate, this means that at the MTTF, the probability
of failure is around 63 % or that on average, approximately 2/3 of all components have failed.
– t 1
F t = 1 – e ,where t = MTTF and = -----------------
MTTF
1 MTTF
– ----------------
MTTF-
F MTTF = 1 – e
–1 1
F MTTF = 1 – e = 1 – ---
e
F MTTF = 63.2 %
DISCLAIMER
PLEASE CAREFULLY READ THE BELOW TERMS AND CONDITIONS BEFORE USING THE INFORMATION
SHOWN HEREIN. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH ANY OF THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, DO NOT USE THE
INFORMATION.
The information provided in this general information document was formulated using the utmost care; however, it is provided by
ams-OSRAM AG or its Affiliates* on an “as is” basis. Thus, ams-OSRAM AG or its Affiliates* does not expressly or implicitly assume
any warranty or liability whatsoever in relation to this information, including – but not limited to – warranties for correctness, com-
pleteness, marketability, fitness for any specific purpose, title, or non-infringement of rights. In no event shall ams-OSRAM AG or
its Affiliates* be liable – regardless of the legal theory – for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, exemplary, consequential, or
punitive damages arising from the use of this information. This limitation shall apply even if ams-OSRAM AG or its Affiliates* has
been advised of possible damages. As some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of certain warranties or limitations of liabilities,
the above limitations and exclusions might not apply. In such cases, the liability of ams-OSRAM AG or its Affiliates* is limited to the
greatest extent permitted in law.
ams-OSRAM AG or its Affiliates* may change the provided information at any time without giving notice to users and is not obliged
to provide any maintenance or support related to the provided information. The provided information is based on special conditions,
which means that the possibility of changes cannot be precluded.
Any rights not expressly granted herein are reserved. Other than the right to use the information provided in this document, no other
rights are granted nor shall any obligations requiring the granting of further rights be inferred. Any and all rights and licenses regar-
ding patents and patent applications are expressly excluded.
It is prohibited to reproduce, transfer, distribute, or store all or part of the content of this document in any form without the prior
written permission of ams-OSRAM AG or its Affiliates* unless required to do so in accordance with applicable law..
* ("Affiliate” means any existing or future entity: (i) directly or indirectly controlling a Party; (ii) under the same direct, indirect or joint
ownership or control as a Party; or (iii) directly, indirectly or jointly owned or controlled by a Party. As used herein, the term “control”
(including any variations thereof) means the power or authority, directly or indirectly, to direct or cause the direction of the manage-
ment and policies of such Party or entity, whether through ownership of voting securities or other interests, by contract or otherwise.)