JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

SCHOOL YEAR 2021-2022

COMPUTER THESIS

1. Computer Thesis must have the following parts:

TITLE PAGE
FO 02 SIGNED ADVISER'S ENDORSEMENT FOR ORAL DEFENSE
FO 06 SIGNED ENGLISH EDITING CERTIFICATE
FO 07 APPROVED REVISED MANUSCRIPT
ABSTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study
B. Objective of the Study
C. Statement of the Problem
D. Scope and Delimitation
E. Significance of the Study
F. Conceptual Framework

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

A. Foreign Studies
B. Local Studies
C. Definition of Terms

CHAPTER III EXISTING SYSTEM

A.Departmental Profile
B. Organizational Chart
C. Existing Data Flow Diagram

CHAPTER IV PROPOSED SYSTEM

A. Planning and Requirements
B.Analysis and Design Phase
C. Hardware Specifications
D. Software Specifications
E. Data Flow Diagram
F. Homepage
G. GANTT Chart

CHAPTER IV PRESENTATION,ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

CHAPTER V SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REFERENCES
APPENDICES
 FO 01 Checklist
 FO 03 Evaluation Form
 FO 05 Summary of Recommendations
  Survey Questionnaire
 Respondents Tabulation of Responses
 Students’ Curriculum Vitae
Forms for attachment

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

SCHOOL YEAR 2021-2022

FO 01 SUBMISSION CHECKLIST: RESEARCH PROPOSAL

Instructions:
1. Provide all the necessary information and affix your e-signature
2. Email file to the teacher-in-charge
3. Send soft copy to accompany the checklist of items you will submit for oral defense.
4. Print this form in 8.5x11 letter (short bond paper) in laser or inkjet printer in the best possible print setting

Title of Research:________________________________________________________________________
Research Adviser: ___________________________________
Students Information:
Grade and Section: _______________________
Group No.: _______________________
Group Leader: _______________________ ___________________________ _______
(Surname) (Given name) MI
Group Members: _______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______

SUBMISSION CHECKLIST
1. Soft Manuscript Copy of research _____YES _____NO
2. FO 01 Checklist _____YES _____NO
3. FO 02 Signed Adviser's Endorsement _____YES _____NO
4. FO 03 Evaluation Form for RP/CT/BP _____YES _____NO
5. FO 04 Evaluation Form for BP Oral Defense _____YES _____NO
6. FO 05 Summary of Recommendations _____YES _____NO
7 FO 06 Signed English Editing Certificate _____YES _____NO
8. FO 07 Approved Revised Manuscript _____YES _____NO
9. 2 Soft Bound Approved Manuscript _____YES _____NO
 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
SCHOOL YEAR 2021-2022

FO 02 RESEARCH ADVISER’S ENDORSEMENT FOR ORAL DEFENSE

Title of Research:__________________________________________________________________________
Date of Defense:___________________________
Students Information:
Grade and Section: _______________________
Group No.: _______________________
Group Leader: _______________________ ___________________________ _______
(Surname) (Given name) MI
Group Members: _______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______

To be filled-out by the Teacher-in-Charge/ Research Adviser

We have reviewed and fully endorse the manuscript attached herewith for
evaluation. We look forward to a robust and thorough review of this manuscript
and welcome the necessary changes, if any, to execute receiving proposed study.

_____________________________
Teacher-in-Charge Name and Signature

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

SCHOOL YEAR 2021-2022

FO 03C EVALUATION FORM FOR COMPUTER THESIS

Title of Thesis:__________________________________________________________________________
Date of Defense:___________________________ Time:____________________
Students Information:
Grade and Section: _______________________
Group No.: _______________________
Group Leader: _______________________ ___________________________ _______
(Surname) (Given name) MI
Group Members: _______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______

Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Satisfactory (2) Needs Score

Improvement(
1)
Organization Thesis Thesis Thesis Thesis
30% document is document is document document is
well-organized organized but shows disorganized
and structured lacks certain organization but and the flow of
elements has several information and
portions that are arguments is
not relevant confusing
Accuracy Explanations Explanations Explanations Explanations
30% and facts and facts and facts and facts
presented/cited presented/cited presented/cited presented/cited
are 100% show some show a are all
accurate inaccuracies significant misconceptions
number of
inaccuracies
Presentation of Arguments and Arguments and Arguments and Arguments and
arguments/explanatio explanations explanations explanations explanations
ns presented are presented are presented only presented do
40% clear, valid and clear, valid and partially not in any way
convincing convincing but addressed the address the
has several problem problem
flaws
Rubric Score:

Recommendations (use additional sheet if necessary)

_____________________________________________
Panelist’s Signature over Printed Name and Date Signed

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

SCHOOL YEAR 2021-2022
 FO 05 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
(to be summarized by the Chair)

Title of Research:__________________________________________________________________________
Students Information:
Grade and Section: _______________________
Group No.: _______________________
Group Leader: _______________________ ___________________________ _______
(Surname) (Given name) MI
Group Members: _______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______

Panel members Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5

Panel 1

Panel 2

Chair

Name and Signature:Panel 1 __________________________________ ________________

Panel 1 __________________________________ ________________
Chair __________________________________ ________________

REVISIONS DONE

RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION PAGE REMARKS

TAKEN NO. (by the panelists)
Note: Indicate done, revised, added under action taken
Place the page number where these revisions are seen in your manuscript
Abstract of the paper must include what the study is all about, the system design, the questions, the
result and recommendations in 1 paragraph
submit soft copy of revised manuscript one week after the receipt of these recommendations

_____________________________________
Name and Signature of the leader

Date:________________________

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

SCHOOL YEAR 2021-2022

FO 06 ENGLISH EDITING CERTIFICATION FORM

Title of Research:_______________________________________________________________________
Students Information:
Grade and Section: _______________________
Group No.: _______________________
Group Leader: _______________________ ___________________________ _______
(Surname) (Given name) MI
Group Members: _______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______

This research/thesis/business plan is thorough and acceptable with respect to grammar and composition.

_________________________________
Name of English Editor and Signature

____________________
Date of Completion

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

SCHOOL YEAR 2021-2022

FO 07 COMPUTER THESIS GENERAL COMMENT

TO: Panel 1___________________________

Panel 2___________________________
Chair:____________________________
RE: Revision of Research/Thesis/Business Plan
FROM: Teacher-in-Charge:___________________________
Research Adviser:____________________________
We are enclosing the research/thesis/business plan of Group No.______ Section______________ that you have
recommended for revision. We would like you to please review the revised manuscript.

Please give your recommendations on or before June 30, 2022 to enable the students to proceed in pursuing the
completion of their requirements.

Your support in this endeavor is highly appreciated.

We thank you for your valuable time and expertise.

Title of Research:_______________________________________________________________________
Students Information:
Grade and Section: _______________________
Group No.: _______________________
Group Leader: _______________________ ___________________________ _______
(Surname) (Given name) MI
Group Members: _______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______
_______________________ ___________________________ _______

GENERAL COMMENTS: _______APPROVED

_______DISAPPROVED
_______FOR FURTHER REVISION

COMMENTS:

CONFORME: _____________________________
CHAIR

Sample on how to answer recommendations:

RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION PAGE REMARKS

TAKEN NO. (by the panelist)
Title
Title should bear the proposed system and the target audience and added cover
setting
Chapter 1.Introduction:
Explain what the system is all about and its relevance (add in-text added 3
citation)
A. Background of the Study
Explain the existing system and the problem that still exists on the
existing system

Explain how the study will address the problem

(add in-text citation)
B. Statement of the Problem
Cite the general and specific questions of the study
A. Profile of the respondents
respondents’ age, gender, and educational attainment
B. Assessment based on
1. Maintainability
2. Reliability
3. Usability
4. User-friendly
5. Functionality
C. Recommendations
C. Scope and limitations
Explain how the system works and its limitation
D. Significance of the study
Identify persons who will benefit in the proposed system and how
they will be benefitted
E. Definition of terms
Include only important concepts and give definitions based on
how they are used in the study
F. Conceptual Framework
Use the Input-Process-Output in presenting the concepts of the
study
Chapter 2 Review of Related Literature
A. Foreign Related Literature
B. Local Related Literature
(Mention at least 5-8 related studies and their findings;(use in-text
citations)
Chapter 3Methodology
Present and explain the methodology. Diagram and requirements
for the proposed system
A.Proposed system
Give a short description of the proposed system
B.Planning and requirements
Explain the preparations done prior to the development of the
system
C.Analysis and Design Phase
Explain how the group work on the computer design
D.Testing
Explain the steps done to test the system and to address the
possible problem
E. Evaluation
Explain how the system is evaluated based on its functionality
F. Hardware Requirements
List down the hardware requirements and their descriptions
G. Soft Requirements
List down the software requirements and their descriptions
H. Requirements Specifications
Explain the process involved in the computer system
I.Data Flow Diagram
J.Homepage
K. Gantt Chart
Chapter 4 Presentation,Analysis and Interpretation of Data
A. Profile of the respondents
In tabular form, present and interpret the respondents’ age,
gender, and educational attainment
B. Assessment
1. Maintainability
2. Reliability
3. Usability
4. User-friendly
5. Functionality
(assessment will be based on the result of the survey)
C. Recommendations based on respondents
D. Over-all Assessment
Chapter 5 Summary, Conclusion and Recommendations
A. Summary of Findings
1. Profile of Respondents
2. Assessment
B. Conclusion
C. Recommendations
References
Use APA format for all the references cited

Appendices
Appendix A Questionnaire
Appendix B Tally of the Respondents’ Responses
Appendix C Curriculum Vitae

Note: *Indicate done, revised, added under action taken

*Place the page number where these revisions are seen in your manuscript
*Abstract of the paper must include what the study is all about, the system design, the questions, the
result and recommendations in 1 paragraph
*submit soft copy of revised manuscript one week after the receipt of these recommendations

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

SCHOOL YEAR 2021-2022

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR A PROPOSED COMPUTER SYSTEM

Title of Research:_________________________________________________________

Research Questionnaire:

Dear Respondents,
 The purpose of this questionnaire is to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed (indicate your study)
for (target user) of (place). in terms of its maintainability, reliability, usability, user interface and functionality.
This also aims to collect your recommendations that may improve the level of implementation of the developed
system.
We would like to ask for your cooperation by accomplishing the questionnaire. Rest assured that all the
data gathered will only be used for statistical treatment and will be treated confidentially.

Part 1 Respondent’s Profile

Directions: Please fill-in the necessary information.
Name(optional)__________________________
Age: ___________
Gender: ___________
Grade Level: ___________
Educational Attainment:_______________

Part 2 Questionnaire
Directions:Please tick the box and rate the degree of effectiveness of the proposed system in accordance with
ISO/IEC 25010:2011.

1.Maintainability
5 Very Maintainable
4 Maintainable
3 Moderately maintainable
2 Less maintainable
1 Not Maintainable

Maintainability 5 4 3 2 1
1.1The system maintains up to date information
1.2 The software provides, edits, deletes
information to maintain the organizability of the
data
1.3 The software can be retrieved from a built-in
backup feature

2. Reliability
5 Very reliable
4 Reliable
` 3 Moderately reliable
2.Less Reliable
1 Not Reliable

Reliability 5 4 3 2 1
2.1 The software can handle 1,000+ entries
 2.2 The software meets need for reliability
under normal operation
2.3 The system provides (identify feature of
your system) that the admin can post
announcement anytime

3.Usability
5 Very useful
4 Useful
3 Moderately useful
2 Less Useful
1 Not Useful

Usability 5 4 3 2 1
3.1 The system offers (indicate what your
system can do)
3.2 The system is equipped with edit function
in case of making a mistake in the endoding
3.3 The system is capable to generate (what
information can your system generate)
3.4 The system offers monitoring of (what can
your system monitor)
3.5 The system has (what feature) to notify the
users

4.User Interface
5 Very user-friendly
4 User-friendly
3 Moderately user-friendly
2 Less User-friendly
1 Not User-friendly

User Interface 5 4 3 2 1
4.1 The design of the software is appealing to
the user
4.2 The color combination is pleasing to the
eyes
4.3 The web-page design is appropriate
4.4 The software is easy to navigate

5.Functionality
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Somewhat Agree
2 Disagree
 1 Strongly Disagree

5 4 3 2 1
5.1 The system can print the generated form
5.2 The system offers to add, edit, and delete
the recorded information
5.3 The system has the ability to search and
display specific information
5.4 The system (what is its outstanding feature)

Recommendations:__________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________

Sample for CHAPTER IV PRESENTATION,ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

 RQ1 Respondents’ Profile
Table 1 Respondents Profile
N=30

Demographic profile Number Percentage

1.Age
14-16 15 50%
17-19 10
20-25 5
26-30
31+
2.Grade Level
7
8
9
10 15
SHS 10
College 5
Professional

Table 1 shows the demographic profiles of the respondents. 50% of the respondents belong to
the age group of 14-16….

RQ 2 Evaluation of the Proposed Computer System

Table 2 Summary obtained by the system in terms of Maintainabilty

Descriptors Total Average

1.1The system maintains up to date information 42 4.2
1.2 The software provides, edits, deletes information to 38 3.8
maintain the organizability of the data
1.3 The software can be retrieved from a built-in backup 40 4.0
feature
Total: 4

How to get summary of scores:

1.1 5 5 4 4 5 4 3 5 4 3= 42/10=4.2

Table 2 shows the summary of scores obtained by the proposed system in terms of
maintainability. Descriptor 1.1 receives the highest average of 4.2 which means that the proposed
system contains features that continuously updates information. Descriptor 1.2 receives the lowest
average of 3.8 which would mean that the system needs to add features to properly organized the input
data The over-all result shows that the system is maintainable having an average of 4 which could be
interpreted that the system will be restored or repaired to a specified condition within a specified period
or time when maintenance is performed in accordance with prescribed procedures.

Table 2.1 Summary obtained by the system in terms of Reliability

Descriptors Total Average

 2.1 The software can handle 1,000+ entries
2.2 The software meets need for reliability under normal
operation
2.3 The system provides (identify feature of your
system) that the admin can post announcement anytime

Interpretation:

Table 2.2 Summary obtained by the system in terms of Usability

Descriptors Total Average

3.1 The system offers (indicate what your system can
do)
3.2 The system is equipped with edit function in case of
making a mistake in the endoding
3.3 The system is capable to generate (what information
can your system generate)
3.4 The system offers monitoring of (what can your
system monitor)
3.5 The system has (what feature) to notify the users

Interpretation:

Table 2 3 Summary obtained by the system in terms of User Interface

Descriptors Total Average

4.1 The design of the software is appealing to the user
4.2 The color combination is pleasing to the eyes
4.3 The web-page design is appropriate
4.4 The software is easy to navigate

Interpretation:

Table 2.4 Summary obtained by the system in terms of Functionality

Descriptors Total Average

5.1 The system can print the generated form
5.2 The system offers to add, edit, and delete the
recorded information
5.3 The system has the ability to search and display
specific information
5.4 The system (what is its outstanding feature)

Interpretation:

 Grading your paper:

 Teacher-in-Charge/Adviser 30%
Panelists 60%
Language Editor 10%

 The 2 soft bound approved manuscript (yellow) will be a part of the students’ clearance and will not
affect the submission of grades

 Timetable:
June 6-10 Revision of manuscript, tabulation and interpretation
June 13-17 Evaluation of Manuscripts by the panelists
English Editing by the English Editor
June 27-July 1 Final Revision for soft bounding

 PPT Presentation:

Title

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study
 What is your study all about and its relevance
B. Statement of the Problem
 Indicate the three questions
1. What is the respondents’ demographic profile in terms of:
1.1 Age;
1.2 Gender; and,
1.3 Educational Attainment.
2. What is the respondents’ assessment on the proposed based on:
1. Maintainability;
1. Reliability;
2. Usability;
3. User-friendly; and,
4. Functionality.
3. What are the recommendations given by the respondents to improve the system?

C. Conceptual Framework
Figure 1
 Conceptual Framework of the ___________________________________________

D.
E.
F.
G.

H.
I.
J.
K.

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Foreign Studies
Paper Author Year of Publication Findings

Local Studies

Paper Author Year of Publication Findings

Definition of Terms
Terms General Definition Technical Definition
(Definition is based on how these terms
are used in your study)
Artists A person who produces paintings People who specializes or likes to do
or drawings as a profession or art like drawings or paintings.
hobby.
Code refactoring The process of restructuring The way of reconstructing the code
existing computer code changing without changing the external behavior
the factoring without changing its of the codes for the improvement of the
external behavior. website.

CHAPTER III EXISTING SYSTEM

  Existing Data Flow Diagram

CHAPTER IV PROPOSED SYSTEM

A. Planning and Requirements
B.Analysis and Design Phase
C. Hardware Specifications
D. Software Specifications
E. Data Flow Diagram
F. Homepage

CHAPTER IV PRESENTATION,ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

RQ1
RQ2
RQ3

CHAPTER V SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS