Architecture of Mesopotamia

A restored ziggurat in Iraq

The architecture of Mesopotamia is ancient architecture of the region of the Tigris–Euphrates

river system (also known as Mesopotamia), encompassing several distinct cultures and spanning
a period from the 10th millennium BC, when the first permanent structures were built, to the 6th
century BC. Among the Mesopotamian architectural accomplishments are the development of
urban planning, the courtyard house, and ziggurats. No architectural profession existed in
Mesopotamia; however, scribes drafted and managed construction for the government, nobility,
or royalty. The Mesopotamians regarded 'the craft of building' as a divine gift taught to men by
the gods.

Contents
 1 Building materials
 2 Urban planning
 3 Houses
 4 Palace
 5 Temples
o 5.1 Ziggurats

 6 Design of Assyrian buildings, fortifications and temples

 7 Landscape architecture
 8 See also
 9 References
 10 Further reading
Building materials
Sumerian masonry was usually mortarless although bitumen was sometimes used. Brick styles,
which varied greatly over time, are categorized by period.

 Patzen 80×40×15 cm: Late Uruk period (3600–3200 BC)

 Riemchen 16×16 cm: Late Uruk period (3600–3200 BC)
 Plano-convex 10x19x34 cm: Early Dynastic Period (3100–2300 BC)

The favoured design was rounded bricks, which are somewhat unstable, so Mesopotamian
bricklayers would lay a row of bricks perpendicular to the rest every few rows. The advantages
to plano-convex bricks were the speed of manufacture as well as the irregular surface which held
the finishing plaster coat better than a smooth surface from other brick types.

Bricks were sun baked to harden them. These types of bricks are much less durable than oven-
baked ones so buildings eventually deteriorated. They were periodically destroyed, leveled, and
rebuilt on the same spot. This planned structural life cycle gradually raised the level of cities, so
that they came to be elevated above the surrounding plain. The resulting mounds are known as
tells, and are found throughout the ancient Near East. Civic or public buildings slowed decay by
using cones of colored stone, terracotta panels, and clay nails driven into the adobe-brick to
create a protective sheath that decorated the façade.

Specially prized or valued were imported building materials such as cedar from Lebanon, diorite
from Arabia, and lapis lazuli from India. Mesopotamia is along the border of IRAQ. Babylonian
temples are massive structures of crude brick, supported by buttresses, the rain being carried off
by drains. One such drain at Ur was made of lead. The use of brick led to the early development
of the pilaster and column, and of frescoes and enamelled tiles. The walls were brilliantly
colored, and sometimes plated with zinc or gold, as well as with tiles. Painted terra-cotta cones
for torches were also embedded in the plaster. Assyria, imitating Babylonian architecture, also
built its palaces and temples of brick, even when stone was the natural building material of the
country – faithfully preserving the brick platform, necessary in the marshy soil of Babylonia, but
little needed in the north.
An Assyrian winged bull, also known as a shedu, Bas-relief c. 713–716 BC

As time went on, however, later Assyrian architects began to shake themselves free of
Babylonian influence, and to use stone as well as brick. The walls of Assyrian palaces were lined
with sculptured and coloured slabs of stone, instead of being painted as in Chaldea. Three stages
may be traced in the art of these bas-reliefs: it is vigorous but simple under Ashurnasirpal II,
careful and realistic under Sargon II, and refined but wanting in boldness under Ashurbanipal.

In Babylonia, in place of the bas relief, there is greater use of three-dimensional figures in the
round – the earliest examples being the statues from Girsu, that are realistic if somewhat clumsy.
The paucity of stone in Babylonia made every pebble precious, and led to a high perfection in the
art of gem-cutting. Two seal-cylinders from the age of Sargon of Akkad are among the best
examples of their kind. One of the first remarkable specimens of early metallurgy to be
discovered by archaeologists is the silver vase of Entemena. At a later epoch or stage, great
excellence was attained in the manufacture of such jewellery as earrings and bracelets of gold.
Copper, too, was worked with skill; indeed, it is possible that Babylonia was the original home
of copper-working.

The people were famous at an early date for their embroideries and rugs. The forms of Assyrian
pottery are graceful; the porcelain, like the glass discovered in the palaces of Nineveh, was
derived from Egyptian models. Transparent glass seems to have been first introduced in the reign
of Sargon. Stone, clay and glass were used to make vases, and vases of hard stone have been dug
up at Girsu similar to those of the early dynastic period of Egypt.

The Tigris-Euphrates plain lacked minerals. Sumerian structures were made of plano-convex
mudbrick, not fixed with mortar or cement. Mud-brick buildings eventually deteriorate, so they
were periodically destroyed, leveled, and rebuilt on the same spot. This constant rebuilding
gradually raised the level of cities, which thus came to be elevated above the surrounding plain.
The resultant hills, known as tells, are found throughout the ancient Near East.

The study of ancient Mesopotamian architecture is based on available archaeological evidence,

pictorial representation of buildings, and texts on building practices. According to Archibald
Sayce, the primitive pictograms of the Uruk period era suggest that "Stone was scarce, but was
already cut into blocks and seals. Brick was the ordinary building material, and with it cities,
forts, temples and houses were constructed. The city was provided with towers and stood on an
artificial platform; the house also had a tower-like appearance. It was provided with a door which
turned on a hinge, and could be opened with a sort of key; the city gate was on a larger scale, and
seems to have been double. ... Demons were feared who had wings like a bird, and the
foundation stones – or rather bricks – of a house were consecrated by certain objects that were
deposited under them."

Scholarly literature usually concentrates on the architecture of temples, palaces, city walls and
gates, and other monumental buildings, but occasionally one finds works on residential
architecture as well. Archaeological surface surveys also allowed for the study of urban form in
early Mesopotamian cities.
Urban planning
The Sumerians were the first society to construct the city itself as a built form. They were proud
of this achievement as attested in the Epic of Gilgamesh which opens with a description of Uruk
its walls, streets, markets, temples, and gardens. Uruk itself is significant as the center of an
urban culture which both colonized and urbanized western Asia.

The construction of cities was the end product of trends which began in the Neolithic Revolution.
The growth of the city was partly planned and partly organic. Planning is evident in the walls,
high temple district, main canal with harbor, and main street. The finer structure of residential
and commercial spaces is the reaction of economic forces to the spatial limits imposed by the
planned areas resulting in an irregular design with regular features. Because the Sumerians
recorded real estate transactions it is possible to reconstruct much of the urban growth pattern,
density, property value, and other metrics from cuneiform text sources.

The typical city divided space into residential, mixed use, commercial, and civic spaces. The
residential areas were grouped by profession. At the core of the city was a high temple complex
always sited slightly off of the geographical center. This high temple usually predated the
founding of the city and was the nucleus around which the urban form grew. The districts
adjacent to gates had a special religious and economic function.

The city always included a belt of irrigated agricultural land including small hamlets. A network
of roads and canals connected the city to this land. The transportation network was organized in
three tiers: wide processional streets (Akkadian:sūqu ilāni u šarri), public through streets
(Akkadian:sūqu nišī), and private blind alleys (Akkadian:mūṣû). The public streets that defined a
block varied little over time while the blind-alleys were much more fluid. The current estimate is
10% of the city area was streets and 90% buildings. The canals; however, were more important
than roads for transportation.

Houses
The materials used to build a Mesopotamian house were similar but not exact as those used
today: mud brick, mud plaster and wooden doors, which were all naturally available around the
city, although wood was not common in some cities of Sumer. Most houses had a square center
room with other rooms attached to it, but a great variation in the size and materials used to build
the houses suggest they were built by the inhabitants themselves. The smallest rooms may not
have coincided with the poorest people; in fact, it could be that the poorest people built houses
out of perishable materials such as reeds on the outside of the city, but there is very little direct
evidence for this.

Residential design was a direct development from Ubaid houses. Although Sumerian cylinder
seals depict reed houses, the courtyard house was the predominant typology, which has been
used in Mesopotamia to the present day. This house called e (Cuneiform: 𒂍, E2; Sumerian: e2;
Akkadian: bītu) faced inward toward an open courtyard which provided a cooling effect by
creating convection currents.
This courtyard called tarbaṣu (Akkadian) was the primary organizing feature of the house, all the
rooms opened into it. The external walls were featureless with only a single opening connecting
the house to the street. Movement between the house and street required a 90° turn through a
small antechamber. From the street only the rear wall of the antechamber would be visible
through an open door, likewise there was no view of the street from the courtyard. The
Sumerians had a strict division of public and private spaces. The typical size for a Sumerian
house was 90 m2.

Palace
The palace came into existence during the Early Dynastic I period. From a rather modest
beginning the palace grows in size and complexity as power is increasingly centralized. The
palace is called a 'Big House' (Cuneiform: E2.GAL Sumerian e2-gal Akkdian: ekallu) where the
lugal or ensi lived and worked.

The palaces of the early Mesopotamian elites were large-scale complexes, and were often
lavishly decorated. Earliest known examples are from the Diyala River valley sites such as
Khafajah and Tell Asmar. These third millennium BC palaces functioned as large-scale socio-
economic institutions, and therefore, along with residential and private functions, they housed
craftsmen workshops, food storehouses, ceremonial courtyards, and are often associated with
shrines. For instance, the so-called "giparu" (or Gig-Par-Ku in Sumerian) at Ur where the Moon
god Nanna's priestesses resided was a major complex with multiple courtyards, a number of
sanctuaries, burial chambers for dead priestesses, and a ceremonial banquet hall. A similarly
complex example of a Mesopotamian palace was excavated at Mari in Syria, dating from the Old
Babylonian period.

Assyrian palaces of the Iron Age, especially at Kalhu/Nimrud, Dur Sharrukin/Khorsabad and
Ninuwa/Nineveh, have become famous due to the pictorial and textual narrative programs on
their walls, all carved on stone slabs known as orthostats. These pictorial programs either
incorporated cultic scenes or the narrative accounts of the kings' military and civic
accomplishments. Gates and important passageways were flanked with massive stone sculptures
of apotropaic mythological figures. The architectural arrangements of these Iron Age palaces
were also organized around large and small courtyards. Usually the king's throne room opened to
a massive ceremonial courtyard where important state councils met and state ceremonies were
performed.

Massive amounts of ivory furniture pieces were found in many Assyrian palaces pointing to an
intense trade relationship with North Syrian Neo-Hittite states at the time. Bronze repousse bands
decorated the wooden gates.

Temples
Temples often predated the creation of the urban settlement and grew from small one room
structures to elaborate multi-acre complexes across the 2,500 years of Sumerian history.
Sumerian temples, fortifications, and palaces made use of more advanced materials and
techniques, such as buttresses, recesses, and half columns. Chronologically, Sumerian temples
evolved from earlier Ubaid temples. As the temple decayed it was ritually destroyed and a new
temple built on its foundations. The successor temple was larger and more articulated than its
predecessor temple. The evolution of the E2.abzu temple at Eridu is a frequently cited case-study
of this process. Many temples had inscriptions engraved into them, such as the one at Tell Uqair.
Palaces and city walls came much later after temples in the Early Dynastic Period.
The form of a Sumerian temple is manifestation of Near Eastern cosmology, which described the
world as a disc of land which was surrounded by a salt water ocean, both of which floated on
another sea of fresh water called apsu, above them was a hemispherical firmament which
regulated time. A world mountain formed an axis mundi that joined all three layers. The role of
the temple was to act as that axis mundi, a meeting place between gods and men. The sacredness
of 'high places' as a meeting point between realms is a pre-Ubaid belief well attested in the Near
East back the Neolithic age. The plan of the temple was rectangular with the corners pointing in
cardinal directions to symbolize the four rivers which flow from the mountain to the four world
regions. The orientation also serves a more practical purpose of using the temple roof as an
observatory for Sumerian timekeeping. The temple was built on a low terrace of rammed earth
meant to represent the sacred mound of primordial land which emerged from the water called
dukug, 'pure mound' (Sumerian: du6-ku3 Cuneiform:) during creation.

The doors of the long axis were the entry point for the gods, and the doors of the short axis the
entry point for men. This configuration was called the bent axis approach, as anyone entering
would make a ninety degree turn to face the cult statue at the end of the central hall. The bent
axis approach is an innovation from the Ubaid temples which had a linear axis approach, and is
also a feature of Sumerian houses. An offering table was located in the center of the temple at the
intersection of the axes.

Temples of the Uruk Period divided the temple rectangle into tripartite, T-shaped, or combined
plans. The tripartite plan inherited from the Ubaid had a large central hall with two smaller
flanking halls on either side. The entry was along the short axis and the shrine was at the end of
the long axis. The T-shaped plan, also from the Ubaid period, was identical to the tripartite plan
except for a hall at one end of the rectangle perpendicular to the main hall. Temple C from the
Eanna district of Uruk is a case-study of classical temple form.

There was an explosion of diversity in temple design during the following Early Dynastic Period.
The temples still retained features such as cardinal orientation, rectangular plans, and buttresses.
Now however they took on a variety new configurations including courtyards, walls, basins, and
barracks. The Sin Temple in Khafajah is typical of a this era, it was designed around a series of
courtyards leading to a cella.

The high temple was a special type of temple that was home to the patron god of the city.
Functionally, it served as a storage and distribution center as well as housing the priesthood. The
White Temple of Anu in Uruk is typical of a high temple which was built very high on a
platform of adobe-brick. In the Early Dynastic period high temples began to include a ziggurat, a
series of platforms creating a stepped pyramid. Such ziggurats may have been the inspiration for
the Biblical Tower of Babel.

Ziggurats

Ziggurats were huge pyramidal temple towers which were first built in Sumerian City-States and
then developed in Babylonia and Assyrian cities as well. There are 32 ziggurats known at, or
near, Mesopotamia—28 in Iraq and 4 in Iran. Notable ziggurats include the Great Ziggurat of Ur
near Nasiriyah, Iraq, the Ziggurat of Aqar Quf near Baghdad, Iraq, Chogha Zanbil in Khūzestān,
Iran (the most recent to be discovered), and the Sialk near Kashan, Iran. Ziggurats were built by
the Sumerians, Babylonians, Elamites, and Assyrians as monuments to local religions. The
earliest examples of the ziggurat were raised platforms that date from the Ubaid period during
the fourth millennium BC, and the latest date from the 6th century BC. The top of the ziggurat
was flat, unlike many pyramids. The step pyramid style began near the end of the Early Dynastic
Period.

Built in receding tiers upon a rectangular, oval, or square platform, the ziggurat was a pyramidal
structure. Sun-baked bricks made up the core of the ziggurat with facings of fired bricks on the
outside. The facings were often glazed in different colors and may have had astrological
significance. Kings sometimes had their names engraved on these glazed bricks. The number of
tiers ranged from two to seven, with a shrine or temple at the summit. Access to the shrine was
provided by a series of ramps on one side of the ziggurat or by a spiral ramp from base to
summit. It has been suggested that ziggurats were built to resemble mountains, but there is little
textual or archaeological evidence to support that hypothesis.

Classical ziggurats emerged in the Neo-Sumerian Period with articulated buttresses, vitreous
brick sheathing, and entasis in the elevation. The Ziggurat of Ur is the best example of this style.
Another change in temple design in this period was a straight as opposed to bent-axis approach
to the temple.
Ur-Nammu's ziggurat at Ur was designed as a three-stage construction, but today only two of
these survive. This entire mudbrick core structure was originally given a facing of baked brick
envelope set in bitumen, 2.5 m on the first lowest stage, and 1.15 m on the second. Each of these
baked bricks were stamped with the name of the king. The sloping walls of the stages were
buttressed. The access to the top was by means of a triple monumental staircase, which all
converges at a portal that opened on a landing between the first and second stages. The height of
the first stage was about 11 m while the second stage rose some 5.7 m. Usually, a third stage is
reconstructed by the excavator of the ziggurat (Leonard Woolley), and crowned by a temple. At
the Chogha Zanbil ziggurat, archaeologists have found massive reed ropes that ran across the
core of the ziggurat structure and tied together the mud brick mass.

The most notable architectural remains from early Mesopotamia are the temple complexes at
Uruk from the 4th millennium BC, temples and palaces from the Early Dynastic period sites in
the Diyala River valley such as Khafajah and Tell Asmar, the Third Dynasty of Ur remains at
Nippur (Sanctuary of Enlil) and Ur (Sanctuary of Nanna), Middle Bronze Age remains at Syrian-
Turkish sites of Ebla, Mari, Alalakh, Aleppo and Kultepe, Late Bronze Age palaces at Bogazkoy
(Hattusha), Ugarit, Ashur and Nuzi, Iron Age palaces and temples at Assyrian (Kalhu/Nimrud,
Khorsabad, Nineveh), Babylonian (Babylon), Urartian (Tushpa/Van, Haykaberd, Ayanis,
Armavir, Erebuni, Bastam) and Neo-Hittite sites (Karkamis, Tell Halaf, Karatepe). Houses are
mostly known from Old Babylonian remains at Nippur and Ur. Among the textual sources on
building construction and associated rituals are Gudea's cylinders from the late 3rd millennium
are notable, as well as the Assyrian and Babylonian royal inscriptions from the Iron Age.

The most impressive and famous of Sumerian buildings are the ziggurats, large layered platforms
which supported temples. Some scholars have theorized that these structures might have been the
basis of the Tower of Babel described in Genesis. Sumerian cylinder seals also depict houses
built from reeds not unlike those built by the Marsh Arabs of Southern Iraq until as recently as
400 AD. The Sumerians also developed the arch, which enabled them to develop a strong type of
roof called a dome. They built this by constructing several arches.

Design of Assyrian buildings, fortifications and temples

Tell Asmar "Standing man" votive sculpture 2750-2600 B.C

The plans of all the Assyrian buildings are rectangular, and we know that long ago, as now, the
Eastern architects used this outline almost invariably, and upon it reared some of the most lovely
and varied forms ever devised. They gather over the angles by graceful curves, and on the basis
of an ordinary square hall carry up a minaret or a dome, an octagon or a circle. That this was
sometimes done in Assyria is shown by the sculptures. Slabs from Kouyunjik show domes of
varied form, and tower-like structures, each rising from a square base. The resemblance between
the ancient form of the dome and those still used in the Assyrian villages is very striking.
Whether sloping roofs were used is uncertain. Mr. Bonomi believes that they were, and a few
sculptures seem to support his view. Of the private houses nothing, of course, remains; but they
are represented on the slabs as being of several stories in height, the ground floor as usual having
only a door and no windows. All have flat roofs, and we gather from one of the bas-reliefs,
which represents a town on fire, that these roofs were made, just as they now are, with thick
layers of earth on strong beams. These roofs are well-nigh fireproof, and the flames are
represented as stopped by them, and coming out of the windows. No remains of a window, or, so
far as we are aware, of an internal staircase, have been found.

Of the fortifications we know much more. In the north wall of Nimroud fifty-eight towers have
been traced, and at Kouyunjik there are large remains of three walls, the lower part being of
stone, and the upper of sun-dried bricks. At Khorsabad there are the remains of a wall, still 40
feet (12 m) high, built of blocks of stone 3 to 4 feet (1.2 m) thick, and the evidences wanting as
to finishing of these is completely supplied by the sculptures, which show an extraordinary
resemblance to medieval works of the same class. Tier upon tier of walls are represented,
enclosing a great tower or keep in the centre. The entrances are great arched gateways flanked by
square towers. These and the other towers have overhanging parapets just like the mediaeval
machicolations, and are finished at top with battlements, remains of which have been found at
Nimrud and Kouyunjik, and at Assur, the capital of Assyria before Nineveh.
Of temples distinct from the palace we have a few supposed remains, but little is absolutely
known as to their general form.

But in Chaldea there are some enormous masses of ruins, evidently remains of the vast mounds
which formed the substructure of their temples. The grandest of all these and the most interesting
is the temple of Nabû at Borsippa (now Birs Nimrod), near Babylon, which has been identified
as the temple of the Seven Spheres. This was reconstructed by Nebuchadnezzar, as appears by a
well-known inscription. Another example is at Mugheir, which was 198 feet (60 m) by 133 feet
(41 m) at the base, and is even now 70 feet (21 m) high, and it is clear that both it and the Birs
were built with diminishing stages, presenting a series of grand platforms, decreasing in length as
they ascended, and leaving a comparatively small one at top for the temple cell. This has been
found, it is supposed, at the Birs Nimroud, of vitrified brick made in ancient ovens.

Landscape architecture
Text sources indicate open space planning was a part of the city from the earliest times. The
description of Uruk in the Epic of Gilgamesh tells of one third of that city set aside for orchards.
Similar planned open space is found at the one fifth enclosure of Nippur. Another important
landscape element was the vacant lot (Akkadian: kišubbû).

External to the city, Sumerian irrigation agriculture created some of the first garden forms in
history. The garden (sar) was 144 square cubits with a perimeter canal. This form of the enclosed
quadrangle was the basis for the later paradise gardens of Persia.

In Mesopotamia, the use of fountains date as far back as the 3rd millennium BC. An early
example is preserved in a carved Babylonian basin, dating back to circa 3000 B.C., found at
Girsu, Lagash. An ancient Assyrian fountain "discovered in the gorge of the Comel River
consists of basins cut in solid rock and descending in steps to the stream." The water was led
from small conduits.

References
1. Harmansah, 2007
2. Sayce, Rev. A. H., Professor of Assyriology, Oxford, "The Archaeology of the
Cuneiform Inscriptions", Second Edition-revised, 1908, Society for Promoting Christian
Knowledge, London, Brighton, New York; at pages 98–100 Not in copyright
3. Dunham, Sally (2005). "Ancient Near Eastern architecture". In Daniel Snell. A
Companion to the Ancient Near East. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 266–280. ISBN 0-631-
23293-1.
4. Crawford 2004, p.77
5. Baker, 2009
 6. Nicholas Postgate, J N Postgate (1994). Early Mesopotamia: Society and
Economy at the Dawn of History.
7. "The first cities: Why Settle Down? The Mystery of Communities – Balter 282
(5393): 1442 – Science". Sciencemag.org. doi:10.1126/science.282.5393.1442. Retrieved
2010-04-17.
8. Susan Pollock (1999). Ancient Mesopotamia.
9. Mendenhall, 1983 p205-208
10. Crawford, p. 73
11. Crawford, pp. 73-74
12. Wikipedia, Sumer
13. "fountain". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 2 May 2010.
Retrieved 2010-03-18.

Further reading
 Baker, H.D. "The Urban Landscape in First Millennium BC Babylonia.". forthcoming.
University of Vienna. Check date values in: |access-date= (help);
 Baker, Heather D. "Works of Heather D. Baker at the University of Toronto". Retrieved
19 June 2015.
 Crawford, Harriet E. W. (2004). Sumer and the Sumerians. Cambridge University Press.
p. 252. ISBN 0-521-53338-4.
 Downey, Susan B. (1988). Mesopotamian Religious Architecture: Alexander Through the
Parthians. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 197. ISBN 0-691-03589-X.
 Harmansah, Ömür (2007-12-03). "The Archaeology of Mesopotamia: Ceremonial
centers, urbanization and state formation in Southern Mesopotamia". Retrieved 2008-08-
11.
 Kostof, Spiro (1995). A history of architecture : settings and rituals. New York: Oxford
University Press. p. 792. ISBN 0-19-508378-4.
 Mendenhall, George; Herbert Bardwell Huffmon; Frank A. Spina; Alberto Ravinell
Whitney Green (1983). The Quest for the Kingdom of God: Studies in Honor of George
E. Mendenhall. Eisenbrauns. p. 316. ISBN 0-931464-15-3.
 Pollock, Susan (1999). Ancient Mesopotamia: The Eden that Never was. Cambridge
University Press. p. 259. ISBN 0-521-57568-0.