Session 9
Session 9
Applications
Session 9
2
Quiz
Suppose a firm produces two products X1 and X2. Each unit of
product X1 contributes Rs. 30 to profit and each unit of product
X2 contributes 40 to profits. The production of these products
require inputs A, B and C and their available quantities are 14, 10
and 4 respectively. It is given that production of one unit of
product X1 requires 2 units of input A, 1 unit of input B and does
not require input C. And the production of one unit of product
X2 requires 2 units of input A, 2 units of input B and 4 units of
input C. Formulate the above problem as a linear programming
problem.
3
Quiz - Answer
Suppose a firm produces two products X1 and X2. Each unit of product X1
contributes Rs. 30 to profit and each unit of product X2 contributes 40 to
profits. The production of these products require inputs A, B and C and their
available quantities are 14, 10 and 4 respectively. It is given that production of
one unit of product X1 requires 2 units of input A, 1 unit of input B and does
not require input C. And the production of one unit of product X2 requires 2
units of input A, 2 units of input B and 4 units of input C. Formulate the above
problem as a linear programming problem.
Maximise: π = 30 X1 + 40 X2 (objective function)
Subject to: 2 X1 + 2 X2 ≤ 14 (Input A constraint)
1 X1 + 2 X2 ≤ 10 (Input B constraint)
X2 ≤ 4 (Input C constraint)
X1, X2 > 0 (non-negativity constraint)
4
Case Study: Production of Washing Machines
5
Case Study: Production of Washing Machines ( contd)
6
Case Study: Production of Washing Machines ( contd)
where X1 and X2 represent the decision variables, that is, the number of Arkel
and Kallex units produced, respectively
7
Case Study: Production of Washing Machines ( contd)
• Beacon should produce 122 units of Arkel and 78 units of Kallex washing
machines leading to an optimised profit of $66,100
• An intuitive response might have been to focus all production on the
washing machine that provides the greater profits per unit (ie, Arkel).
• However, because of the resource constraints -> would not have led to a
situation where profits are maximised.
• Linear programming to analyse the business problem leads to a
production mix that definitively maximises profits.
8
Sensitivity analysis
Till now assumed- all the parameters of the LP model are known and
constant so that there is no provision of risk or uncertainty.
However, in reality- not true for eg.
In a production planning problem, changes in availability of resources;
unit profits may change due to changes in selling prices and cost of
production; resource requirements may change in response to changes
in technology and introduction of some new constraints.
So important for a manager- know how optimal solution would be
affected if any changes in input data used for model
Sensitivity analysis- used to analyse consequences of any changes in
the inputs used in optimal solution obtained
Some may not impact optimal solution, some may - a new optimal
solution involving different objective function value- substantial - even
make earlier solution infeasible
9
Sensitivity analysis
• Changes in the coefficients of the objective function
• Changes in the right side constraints of the constraints
• Changes in the left hand side constraints of the constraints
• Addition or deletion of a constraint
10
Case Study: Production of Washing Machines ( contd)
where X1 and X2 represent the decision variables, that is, the number of Arkel
and Kallex units produced, respectively
11
The Stock-Control Problem- Case study –
Computer Repairs company
• Assume that we have been asked to assist the manager of a company with a
stock-control problem. The company specialises in the maintenance and repair
of business PC systems and much of its market consists of local small- and
medium-sized businesses which have taken out an annual contract with the
repair company. Under this contract the repair company guarantees to repair a
customer's PC within 24 hours or to provide an equivalent replacement until
the repair is effected. The company prides itself on customer service, so it is
keen to ensure that its 24-hour target is met wherever possible. No other local
company offers this type of guarantee and the company sees this as a major
part of its competitive advantage in the marketplace. However, in order to
meet this target, the company has to have an efficient and effective stock
system so that adequate supplies of spare parts are readily available. Clearly if
the service engineer finds that a PC requiring repair needs a specific
replacement part - say a new graphics card - then the company cannot afford
to be in the position of having to order this from the supplier and wait for
delivery if it is to meet its guaranteed repair time.
12
The Stock-Control Problem- Case study –
Computer Repairs company
• The company can purchase these from the supplier at £100 each and
anticipates that over the coming 12 months 250 cards will be needed. The
supplier will supply any quantity we require and because the supplier is
local, delivery of the order is immediate. The company, however, also
realises that placing an order incurs certain costs: someone has to find the
time to get the order sent off, when the order is received it has to be
checked to ensure that what was ordered has been supplied, payment
then has to be authorised and so on. The best guess of the company is
that all of this 'costs' the company £50 each time an order is sent. The
basic problem the company currently faces is: how many of these cards
should be ordered now from the supplier?
• Can you advise the company on a suitable decision?
13
The Stock-Control Problem- Case study –
Computer Repairs company
• One approach: order the quantity of cards now require over the next 12
months- guarantee we will have the card in stock when required.
• However, problem- company will have to spend £25 000 (250 x £100) on the
stock now and this capital will be tied up in the stock for most of the year.
• Problem- looking after the stock over this period - costs relating to security,
insurance, obsolescence, etc.
• Alternative: placing several orders throughout the year.
• Now for 50 cards; further order, every 2 months.
• Adv: capital invested in stock lower but increases the chance of not having a
card in stock when needed.
• Classic dilemma of manager with stock-control responsibility: on the one hand
trying to minimise the costs incurred and other trying to ensure that a
'stockout' (running out of stock) does not occur
14
Costs Involved in Stock Control
15
Costs Involved in Stock Control
• Purchase Cost: actual cost of purchasing the stock item from the supplier.
• Simpler stock-control models - assumed to be constant.
• Sophisticated models - build in discount systems, i.e. lower unit purchase
cost with larger orders.
• We shall assume a fixed cost of £100 per item.
• Holding Costs: associated with the company holding a fixed quantity of
stock over a given period of time. Such costs can include the cost of capital
tied,
• one graphics card in stock for one year it would cost £15 (made up of the
opportunity cost of the £100 purchase cost, security costs and the like).
16
Costs Involved in Stock Control
17
The Stock-Control Decision
18
Example
19
Example
Holding costs
• Calculate the average number of items held in stock at any one time and then
multiply this by Ch.
If Q = 10 scenario, 10 items will arrive from the supplier- Gradually over time
used up.
Manager would like to see is that on the day that the last of these 10 items is used
the next order for 10 items arrives from the supplier so that no stockout ever
occurs, while at the same time ensuring we are not carrying too many stock items.
So, at any one time, the average number of items held in stock will be Q/2
- since at the beginning have Q items; at the end have 0 items
• The holding cost:
• Q/2 × Ch= 10/2 × £15 = £75
• So, with an order size of 10 units, OC will be £1250 and HC £75.
20
Example
21
Order costs and holding costs
22
Order costs and holding costs
23
Order costs,
Total holding
Cost costs and Total cost
24
The Economic Order Quantity Model
• Economic order quantity model: establishing the value for Q
that minimises total cost.
• This value for Q is referred to as the economic order quantity
(EOQ).
• To determining the value of Q - EOQ formula-
• Optimum quantity of stock to order where OC = HC.
25
The Economic Order Quantity Model
• The manager to consider trying to minimise the total costs involved both
the order costs and the holding costs.
• Effect of different decisions
• D - the annual demand for the item, here 250
• Co - the cost of placing each order, £50
• Ch - the cost of holding an item for one year, £15
• Q - the size of the order to be placed (currently unknown).
26
Example
• Using the appropriate values for the variables shown, calculate the EOQ for
this problem.
( )
• = 40.82
• So, EOQ = 40.82 units is the order size that will minimise the total costs
involved and balance the conflict between order costs and holding costs.
• Show: these two costs will be equal at this value of Q:
.
• Holding cost: : X £15 = £306.15
27
Project Management
28
Characteristics of a Project
Projects
• have clearly defined aims and objectives- top management
• have a set completion date;
• involve a set of related activities which comprise the project;
• have resources allocated specifically to them in form of a project budget –
financial or resources like manpower
• involve a team of people
• Project management has to be within time limit, within budget and in
terms of aims and objectives and quality
29
Importance of Project Management
30
Business Example
• As part of its new overall corporate strategy, a local authority is keen to ensure
that the services it provides to local citizens match the needs and aspirations
of the local community. As part of this matching process it has been decided to
undertake a survey of citizens' current attitudes to the services provided. This
will enable managers in the local authority to develop a view of customers'
perceptions of current services as well as trying to identify needs not currently
being met. You have been put in charge of the survey and are under pressure
from both senior managers and elected officials to get this 'project' completed
as soon as possible. Naturally, the 'quality' of the information collected must
not be compromised and, understandably, the resource costs of this project
will need to be carefully monitored and controlled.
• A sequence of tasks.
1. Identify the key activities that will make up the project.
2. Determine the estimated time each individual activity will take to complete.
3. Identify the sequencing of activities in terms of their interdependencies.
31
Activities, Time to be taken, Dependencies
32
Simple network diagram
33
Creating a network diagram
34
Stage 1
35
Stage II
37
• m
38
Final Diagram
• At event 1 both B and D start; then At event 4 both are completed and E
can start.
39
Developing network diagram for project
management
40
Calculate Earliest Finish Time (EFT)
41
Calculate latest finish time (LFT)
42
Identify critical path
• With the information of EFT and LFT, we can determine those activities
which are critical and which are non-critical
• Critical - those without which project will not be completed in time
• E.g. Activity A - critical
• Activity B-critical
• Activity C - non-critical - has 2 days extra which is called float time.
• An activity have same EFT and LFT will have no float time
43
Network Diagram for survey question
44
Critical and Non critical Activities
45
Using the Network Diagram
46
Using the Network Diagram- Use Case 1
47
Using the Network Diagram- Use Case 2
48
Gantt Charts
49
Gantt Chart
50