Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 329 views

    Riph Milestone 3

    Uploaded by

    PRECIOUS MAE
    This document summarizes the debate around whether the Cry of Balintawak or the Cry of Pugad Lawin marked the beginning of the Philippine revolution in 1896. It compares the backgrounds and perspectives of two historians, Jim Richardson and Milagros Guerrero, who have differing views on the topic. The document also analyzes the validity and reliability of sources that support each position, such as testimonies of Katipunan veterans, research by the Philippine Historical Committee, and Aguinaldo's memoirs. The debate between Balintawak and Pugad Lawin continues today without definitive resolution.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Riph Milestone 3

    Uploaded by

    PRECIOUS MAE
    329 views4 pages
    This document summarizes the debate around whether the Cry of Balintawak or the Cry of Pugad Lawin marked the beginning of the Philippine revolution in 1896. It compares the backgrounds and perspectives of two historians, Jim Richardson and Milagros Guerrero, who have differing views on the topic. The document also analyzes the validity and reliability of sources that support each position, such as testimonies of Katipunan veterans, research by the Philippine Historical Committee, and Aguinaldo's memoirs. The debate between Balintawak and Pugad Lawin continues today without definitive resolution.

    Original Title

    RIPH-MILESTONE-3

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes the debate around whether the Cry of Balintawak or the Cry of Pugad Lawin marked the beginning of the Philippine revolution in 1896. It compares the backgrounds and perspectives of two historians, Jim Richardson and Milagros Guerrero, who have differing views on the topic. The document also analyzes the validity and reliability of sources that support each position, such as testimonies of Katipunan veterans, research by the Philippine Historical Committee, and Aguinaldo's memoirs. The debate between Balintawak and Pugad Lawin continues today without definitive resolution.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    329 views4 pages

    Riph Milestone 3

    Uploaded by

    PRECIOUS MAE
    This document summarizes the debate around whether the Cry of Balintawak or the Cry of Pugad Lawin marked the beginning of the Philippine revolution in 1896. It compares the backgrounds and perspectives of two historians, Jim Richardson and Milagros Guerrero, who have differing views on the topic. The document also analyzes the validity and reliability of sources that support each position, such as testimonies of Katipunan veterans, research by the Philippine Historical Committee, and Aguinaldo's memoirs. The debate between Balintawak and Pugad Lawin continues today without definitive resolution.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    Milestone 3: MIRROR, MIRROR ON MY MIND, who is valid, reliable, and authentic of

    them all?

    SECTION: 2.1 BEED DATE:

    GROUP MEMBERS (Last Name,


    First Name, Middle Name)
    1. Morallos, Hanna P.

    2
    EVENTS POINT OF SOURCE 1 SOURCE 1 SIMILARITI
    COMPARISON ES
    Cry of Author and the Jim Richardson is a Milagros C. Both articles
    researcher who Guerrero is a co- discussed the
    Pugad background specializes on author of the controversy of
    Lawin or Philippine widely used the “Cry of
    Balintawak nationalism and history book Pugad Lawin”
    radicalism in the “History of the Lacks of positive
    nineteenth and Filipino People”. documentation
    twentieth century’s. A retired history and supporting
    He published Roots professor of the evidence.
    of Dependency: university of the
    Political and Philippines and
    Economic Evolution has served as
    in 19th Century chair of the
    Philippines with Department of
    Jonathan Fast, the history from
    Philippines, 1989 to 1992. A
    Komunista: The former president
    Genesis of the of the Philippines
    Philippine Historical
    Communist Party, Association in
    and The Light of 2007 and
    Liberty: Documents received an
    and Studies on the award from the
    Katipunan. National
    Research Council
    of the Philippines
    in recognition of
    her work in “the
    holistic synthesis
    Of historical
    materials in the
    field of history”.
    Had a
    collaboration
    with Roman
    Villegas a
    historian and a
    collector and
    with Emmanuel
    Encarnacion, a
    historian, an
    antiquarian and a
    holder of some
    original
    Bonifacio
    Documents.
    Date of
    August 2021 June 06, 2003
    narrative
    Source of Notes on the "Cry" of In Focus:
    August 1896 - Balintawak: The
    narrative Katipunan: Documents Cry for a
    and Studies Nationwide
    (kasaysayan- kkk.info) Revolution -
    National
    Commission for
    Culture and the Arts
    (ncca.gov.ph)

    Interpretation On the 26th of The controversy


    August 1896, the among historians
    s anti-social secret continues up to
    organization, present day. Pio
    Katipunan founded Valenzuela,
    by Andres Bonifacio Briccio Pantas
    decided to revolt and Cipriano
    against the Pacheco
    Spaniards after such proclaimed that
    meetings they had “na hindi sa
    that began on the Balintawak
    23rd of August year nangyari ang
    1896. Despite unang sigaw ng
    Rizal's rejection of paghihimagsik na
    their request to join kinalalagian
    the uprising, ngayon ng
    Bonifacio and his bantayog, kung di
    fellow Katipuneros sa pook na kilala
    continued their sa tawag na
    plan. Despite this, in Pugad Lawin.”. In
    August 1896, a 1940 a research
    Spanish priest team of the
    apprehended them Philippines
    Historical
    and detained
    Committee (a
    members in order to
    forerunner of the
    learn their NHI) which include
    identities. They tore Pio Valenzuela
    their cedulas, or identified the
    community tax precise spot of
    certificates, Pugad Lawin as part
    symbolizing war of sitio gulod,
    against Spain, as a Banlat, Kalookan
    City. Government
    result of this
    maps issued in
    predicament.
    1956, 1987 and
    1990 confirm that
    Pugad Lawin is not
    on any of these
    maps. The official
    stand of NHI is
    that Cry took place
    on August 23.
    However, the date
    is still debatable
    until now.

    Validity, -The testimony of -The research of


    Katipunan Veterans the Philippine
    Reliability and -National Historical Historical
    Authenticity Institute Panel Committee in
    Report, 1978,1996 1940.
    and 2011. -President
    -Isang Pagunita by Doisdado
    Briccio Pantas, C. Macapagal
    Pacheco and Pio ordered that the
    Valenzuela. Cry be celebrated
    on 23 August and
    that Pugad Lawin
    be recognized as
    its site.
    -Emilio
    Aguinaldo’s
    memoirs, Mga
    Gunita ng
    HImagsikan
    (1964).

    REFERENCE:
    https://www.sunstar.com.ph/article/408026/Lifestyle/Bunye-Revisiting-Andres-Bonifacio
    https://independent.academia.edu/JimRichardson?fbclid=IwAR31Kj2zD1k-
    l6gKIpB0UibSDnqHKpSQo8alk4jhxVTECF3dG0ZvEQ-xgvA

    You might also like