Lab Report 2
Lab Report 2
Lab Report 2
Shaheer Ahmed Qureshi
Pakistan Institute of Engineering And Applied Science
Department of Electrical Engineering
COURSE INSTRUCTOR: Dr Arif Gilgiti
LAB INSTRUCTOR: Sir Bilal Nadeem
I. A BSTRACT
This document shows how calculate real and reactive power
supplied and received by each source, line losses and complex
power, along with graphs in case when two sources are Fig. 1.
connected by line impedance using MATLAB (Simulink). In
power system analysis, when dealing with complex power
flow, small change in angle (δ1 or δ2 ) will have a significant reactive power at sending and receiving ends will be:
effect on real power flow. When series resistor is present in P12 = |V1Z||V2 | sin∠δ1 − δ2
the circuit; there will be transmission line losses and the real Q12 = |VZ1 | |V1 | − |V2 |cos∠δ1 − δ2
power sent will not be equal to real power received. To analyze Under these circumstances, the real power at the sending end
power systems, MATLAB, a powerful software, is employed. will be equal to at the receiving end. Assuming R = 0, the
To calculate real power, reactive power and line losses; first a theoretical maximum power transfer will take place when
code will be executed and using graphs, required values will δ = δ1 − δ2 = 90◦ . It will be given by
be extracted which then will be used in formulae to obtain Pmax = |V1X ||V2 |
R ESULTS
V. C ONCLUSION
Objectives of this lab were successfully met. By linking
various functional building blocks in the simulation environ-
ment, the simulation approach allows the researcher to design
power system models to simulate power quality disturbances.
These simulation models serve as foundations models for
power quality research and development of power quality
education and learning curricula. Task 1 enabled us to identify
the type of sources; the calculations show that source 1 was
delivering reactive power while source 2 was receiving it. Task
4 displayed a specific scenario which shows that when angle
changes from -30 to 0 P1 lags and P2 leads and vice versa
when angle changes from 0 to +30. Moreover in task 4 the
observation was that the power loss is approximately zero as
seen in Fig 2. Fig 3 which reflects to task 5 of lab report shows
that reactive power in this case can never be equal to zero and
also it indicates that the voltage magnitude difference between
terminal voltages determines the flow of reactive power along
the interconnection.
R EFERENCES
[1] Hadi Saadat, “Power Analysis” Boston : McGraw-Hill, 2004, second
edition, pp. 50–80.
[2] Bergen AR. Power Systems Analysis. Delhi, India: Pearson Education
India; 2009
[3] Glover JD, Sarma MS. Power System Analysis and Design: With
Personal Computer Applications. Toronto, ON, Canada: International
Thomson Publishing Company; 1994
[4] Glover JD, Sarma MS, Overbye T. Power System Analysis Design, SI
Version. Noida, India: Cengage Learning; 2012
[5] Grainger JJ, Stevenson WD, Stevenson WD. Power System Analysis.
New York, USA; 2003
[6] Gross CA. Power System Analysis. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley; 1986