MyPwCUK (BBA) Report

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Profile Report created for:

Dimma

Company: PwC (Middle East)


Date of assessment: 18 Jun 2022

© 2019 Arctic Shores Ltd


Introduction

Thank you for completing our game-based assessment.

At PwC our culture is all about our people. The development of our people is key, and we pride
ourselves on making sure our people continuously give and get, constructive, focused
feedback. We hope this feedback will help you to reflect on your strengths and development
areas and use this understanding to aid your future career plans, irrespective of the outcome of
this application.

Due to the complexity and competitive nature of our career programmes, PwC base
assessment decisions on a combination of criteria which may vary from role-to-role. This
means your specific results from each assessment do not automatically guarantee progression
to the next stage of our recruitment process. The outcome with regard to this stage of the
recruitment process will be provided on a separate email to you.

 
How to Interpret Your Profile
This report was generated by using thousands of data points from your assessment session.
Your game score was not considered for your psychometric profile; it was all about your unique
approach to the scenarios presented. Arctic Shores assessments are grounded in validated
personality and cognitive neuroscience frameworks and use your real behaviours to create a
psychometric profile. Our extensive research has shown this methodology to be a valid and
reliable indicator of how you are likely to behave in the workplace.

There is no one “perfect profile” for all jobs. Each job is different and we support hiring
organisations with extensive analysis to determine which of the psychological characteristics
described in your report are the most important for success in a particular role. Therefore, the
data in this assessment provides a fair and objective set of measures to help organisations
determine your suitability for a role in addition to the rest of your application.

How This Report is Structured

This report is organised into 5 sections that contain a set of unique psychological
characteristics:

• Personal Style
• Cognition
• Drive
• Interpersonal Style
• Thinking Style

Interpreting Radial Results

For each characteristic, the closer the highlighted radial to either end of the scale the stronger
your tendency or ability in that direction. The majority of the population have moderate
tendencies and abilities so fall within the middle radials. In fact, only 1-2% of people fall at the
extreme ends.

Example
You tend to be more likely than others to
seek out social stimulation.
More Reserved More Sociable

In this example, the radial is closer to “more sociable” but this doesn’t mean that you are always
going to behave sociably. Rather, it means that typically, across time and situations, you tend to
behave slightly more sociably than other people in the comparison group. On occasion, you
may want to be left alone!
Things to Remember

• Arctic Shores profiles are very reliable, but they are not infallible. This can be said of any
psychometric test.
• Each psychological characteristic will be valuable in different job roles; there is no right or
wrong, just a measure of suitability for a role.
• This profile report will be considered along with other information about you before a
selection decision is made.
• The report is likely to remain a good reflection of your psychological characteristics for 9-12
months, depending upon personal circumstances.
• These results will be kept confidential but may be used anonymously in aggregation for
analysis and improvement of our products.
Your Profile

Personal Style
The traits below explain your personal preferences in dealing with situations. There is one
indicator for Personal Style.

Relative to the comparison group, your


responses suggest that you tend to
Less accurate emotion More accurate emotion
interpret facial expressions and emotions
recognition recognition extremely accurately.

Cognition
The abilities below affect how you process and use information to perform mental
operations. There are 3 indicators for Cognition.

Relative to the comparison group, your


responses suggest that you tend to be
Tends to process smaller Tends to process larger
much more confident when mentally
amounts of information amounts of information working with large amounts of information.

Your responses suggest that you tend to


process information as fast as most others
Tends to take more time Tends to process information
in the comparison group.
when processing information quickly

The speed and efficiency of your responses


to incoming information are as consistent
More variable in the speed at Information processed at a
as the rest of the comparison group.
which information is consistent speed over time.
processed.

Drive
The traits below influence your drive for delivering results in the workplace. There are 4
indicators for Drive.

Your responses suggest that you are likely


to remain as focused on a goal under
Tends to “bounce back” more Tends to “bounce back” more
adverse circumstances as most other
slowly after set backs quickly after set backs people in the comparison group, and to
recover from set-backs at a similar speed.

Relative to the comparison group, your


responses suggest that your focus tends to
Focus more influenced by Focus more influenced by
be equally influenced by your values, goals,
thoughts & feelings values & goals thoughts, feelings and physiological state.
Relative to the comparison group, your
responses suggest that you tend to be
Less motivated by reward More motivated by reward
slightly less driven by reward.

Shows the same degree of initiative and


independence in organising, consistently
Tends to be more effective at Shows initiative in organising
working on, and completing a large project
completing shorter tasks. and completing longer as most of the comparison group.
projects with a consistent
approach.

Interpersonal Style
The traits below influence your preferred approach to interacting with other people.
There are 5 indicators for Interpersonal Style.

Relative to the comparison group, your


responses suggest that you are very
More focused on personal More focused on needs of
inclined to take action that is aligned with
needs others the needs of others rather than yourself.

Your responses suggest that you tend to


regulate your behaviour in response to
Tends to prefer own style Tends to adjust behaviour to
social cues as much as most other people
context in the comparison group.

Your responses suggest that you are as


inclined as most other people in the
Feels less energised by social Feels more energised by
comparison group to seek out and feel
situations social situations energised by social interactions.

Relative to the comparison group, your


responses suggest that you are slightly
Tends to be more passive & Tends to be more dominant
more inclined to be reserved and
thoughtful and assertive democratic when interacting with people.

Relative to the comparison group, your


responses suggest that you are quite
Willing to create conflict to Seeks to maintain social
willing to openly challenge viewpoints
achieve aims. harmony. where necessary in order to achieve an aim,
for example in debating an issue with
objectivity and without sentiment.

Thinking Style
The traits below shape how you tend to approach and appraise problems and make
decisions. There are 9 indicators for Thinking Style.

Relative to the comparison group, your


responses suggest that you are inclined to
More comfortable with More comfortable with
tolerate a greater degree of uncertainty
certainty & predictability uncertainty & unpredictability when making a decision and tend to feel
more comfortable than others when the
future is unpredictable.
Relative to the comparison group, your
responses suggest that you are quite likely
Prefers tried and tested Prefers new and
to prefer novel and experimental
methods for solving problems experimental ways to solve approaches to solving problems.
problems

Relative to the comparison group, your


responses suggest that you are much more
Tends to think more precisely Tends to think "outside the
disposed towards thinking "outside of the
box" box" and having a free-flowing and abstract
trail of thought.

Your responses suggest that you are as


inclined as most other people in the
Tends to be more realistic Tends to be more optimistic
comparison group to have a positive
outlook on the world and the future. You
tend to balance expectations that your
actions will result in a more or less
favourable outcome.

Your responses suggest that you are as


likely as most other people in the
Prefers familiarity and Prefers variety and regular
comparison group to prefer variety, trying
consistency change new things and regular change.

Relative to the comparison group, your


responses suggest that you prefer to
Tends to have a short-term Tends to have a long-term
balance your focus between the immediate
orientation orientation and future outcomes when making
decisions.

Relative to the comparison group, your


responses suggest that you are quite
Tends to deliberate carefully Tends to trust instincts on
inclined to carefully consider the risk to
on decisions that involve risk decisions that involve risk benefit ratio before making decisions that
involve a degree of risk.

Relative to the comparison group, your


responses suggest that you are fairly
Tends to make decisions Tends to make decisions
disposed towards an intuitive decision-
based on intuition based on rational thought making style that is based on gut instincts
processes and emotions.

Your responses suggest that you are as


inclined as most other people in the
Tends to be more impulsive Tends to be more deliberative
comparison group to carefully consider
your actions before responding.

You might also like