Structures
Structures
Project Detailed Design and Project Management Consultancy for "Construction of 5 Tunnels
(Approx. Total length 7.35 Km) between Digras-Palashi Stations including Construction
of Road Bed, Major Bridges, Minor Bridges, ROBs, RUBs, including road approaches,
Station Buildings, Staff Qtrs, Other Service buildings, HL Platforms, COPs, FOBs, P.Way
Work, General electrical work and S&T Work from Km 157 to Km 225 of Yavatmal-
Maharashtra.”
Code XX-XXX-XXXX-XXXX-XX
Engineer
Date: 03.08.2022
Coordinator
Date:
Date:
Table of Contents
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................................................................... 5
2. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................................................ 7
3.4.1.Purpose......................................................................................................................................................................................... 25
3.4.3.Types of Interfaces................................................................................................................................................................... 26
4.1.1.Team............................................................................................................................................................................................... 27
4.5. Detailed Report on review & Identification of Geological/ Geotechnical data available.......................32
5.1. Survey............................................................................................................................................................................................. 32
5.2. Alignment...................................................................................................................................................................................... 32
5.5. Structures...................................................................................................................................................................................... 42
5.6. Tunnel............................................................................................................................................................................................. 60
5.6.3.Drainage System...................................................................................................................................................................... 64
5.6.4.Geotechnical investigation.................................................................................................................................................. 64
5.6.5.Design methodology.............................................................................................................................................................. 70
5.6.6.Tunnel Portal............................................................................................................................................................................... 74
5.6.7.Seismic design.......................................................................................................................................................................... 81
5.6.8.Materials....................................................................................................................................................................................... 82
5.7. Buildings........................................................................................................................................................................................ 83
7. DELIVERABLES...................................................................................................................................................................................... 127
A highly professional team has already been engaged for an on-time successful delivery of the project.
The Team Leader shall have the overall responsibility of the project for all disciplines and the Design
Coordinator is responsible for overall Interface Management and Project Integration The team
structure for executing the proposed scope of works under the contract are given below:....................130
List of Tables
List of Figures
ACRONYM
S
DEFINITION
ACRONYM
DL DEAD LOAD
IS INDIAN STANDARD
LL LIVE LOAD
Inception Report
The Inception Report is a record and summary of the Consultant’s plan of action with respect to the
project brief as interpreted from TOR along with design concepts for major aspects of the Project that
shall be developed as detailed designs. The Report also identifies the instructions and requirements from
RVNL to be considered as the Basis of Design for the New BG Line Project from Km 157 to Km 225 of
Yavatmal-Nanded se+ction
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RVNL has been granted a stretch of 207km out of the 284km new BG line. The part RVNL holds from
Yavatmal to Nanded consists of 5 packages. Out of this, Yavatmal-Digras Km 78 to Km 157 consists of
2 packages for which the construction work is already under progress. Package 3 & 4 comprises of
the new BG Line from Km 157 to Km 225 along with 5 tunnels between Digras-Palshi, for which
Detailed Design & PMC has been entrusted to TYPSA. The balance portion of the section from Km 225
to Km 278 comprises of the final 5th package.
This 278km project targeting to bless the two backward regions of Maharashtra with a single BG
railway line. The alignment connects Yavatmal to Nanded via Dharwa, Digras, Pusad and Umarkhed.
The proposal aims to ease the moment of local people and also boost the agricultural and
socioeconomic development of the entire region by connecting it with the main railway network.
The alignment from km 157 to 225 has 6 proposed stations, namely Belgaon, Pusad, Harshi, Shilona,
Palsi and Umerkhed of which Belgaon and Shilona have been proposed as Halt stations, while the
remaining four stations are proposed as Crossing stations.
Detailed Topographical Survey of the entire corridor and Geo Technical investigations are collected
from RVNL. A foot-by-foot Reconnaissance survey is at critical locations is carried out along the
proposed alignment, duly checking various geographical features and access modifications, if any on
the alignment as per the site conditions.
The proposed route is having the total length of the alignment is 68kms which includes 5 No of
tunnels, 24 major bridges, 65 minor bridges, 13 ROBs and 29 RUBs. Land required for construction is
…………..Hectares of which (Private Land - …………..Ha and Government land- ………………….Ha). All the
bridges on the proposed new BG line will be of 25 T Axle loading and provided with ballastless deck
as per extant guidelines of Railway Board. Track structure is proposed with 60 Kg / 90 UTS Rails in
main line and 52 kg rails in looplines and sidings. Proposing 1660 Nos. sleepers per Km in the main
line and 1540 nos in the loopline with 300 mm ballast cushion for Main line and 250mm for loopline.
The tunnels in this report are designed to be constructed according to the New Austrian Tunnelling
Method (NATM). The 5 tunnels, comprising a total length of 7.350 km approx. have been proposed of
which the longest single tunnel is 2.7 km long while the shortest tunnel is 350 m long. The maximum
depth of formation of tunnel from GL is 76.60m and the minimum value is 20.49m. Category of rock at
formation level is Vesicular basalt & Hard rock. Single Tube, Single Track, Two Sub-parallel Adits are
proposed for ……………………….. and Single Tube, Single Track, Separate Escape Tunnel, Cross-Passages
for One Adit for Tunnel………………………
The various inputs like proposed/acquired ROW, alternative routes from publicly available, stretches
where proposed alignment alternatives may likely run parallel to existing roads, details of bridges in
the roads and Details of ongoing projects /new sanctioned proposals pertaining to Railways,
roadways, etc., which may come up along/across the proposed alternatives, data obtained as above
shall be analysed in the desktop study along with the three most viable options, to estimate the
tentative length of bridges based on the width of crossing/ constraint identified. Site visits for critical
locations will be carried out by experts along with RVNL officials. To the extent feasible, the bridges
will be planned in straight alignment, considering economics, flow characteristics, etc. When the
proposed alignment alternative is planned near an existing rail or road alignment, the span
configuration of the existing bridge shall also be taken into consideration. All the structures will be
designed as per the latest IS, IRC & RDSO standard guidelines.
Power Supply and System of Traction for this line is proposed to be electrified with 25 KV, single
phase, 50 Hz. The proposed section is having broad gauge (1676 mm) and total length is about 64
Route KM & Over Head Conductor Track Km length is 84 TKM. The proposed Railway Electrification
consists of constructing electric power supply system including 109 LTlines, 42 nos of 11 KV line, 10
nos of 33 KV line, 4 nos of 66KV line, 6 nos of 132 KV line, 5 nos of 220 KV line and 4 nos of 400 KV line.
Stations Electrification- 4 Nos, Platform Lighting- 04 nos. OHE Depot & Tower wagon Shed at……….. for
maintenance.
The Proposal of new BG line between…….. and……….. has the following Signaling system/modifications.
………………………The Signalling system is considered using an electronic interlocking as per the latest
railway board policy. All stations shall be class-B type with standard –III interlocking, In order to
improve system reliability, the provision of integrated power supply system has been considered. This
will have an added advantage of ensuring uninterrupted power supply round the clock, preventing
signal going blank. A UFSBI single line token less block instrument will be provided along with
Electronic Interlocking with standard III Interlocking to work the single line. The block instruments and
EI controlled panel will be located in the present station building and will be operated and maintained
by the existing station staff who are working in the present system. At junction stations where the
proposed line is integrated with the existing line the same system will followed but with necessary
alterations to existing panel.
2. INTRODUCTION
Abstract: TYPSA was appointed by RVNL for Detailed Design and Project Management Consultancy
Services via LOA No. RVNL/MUMBAI/YTL-NED/DD&PMC dt. 25.07.2022
RVNL has been vested by MoR with the responsibility of implementing the project and hence RVNL has
commissioned TYPSA for the “Detailed Design and Project Management Consultancy Services for the
Construction of Five Tunnels (Approx. Total Length 7.35 km) between Digras-Palshi Stations including
Construction Of Roadbed, Major Bridges, minor bridges, ROBs, RUBs, including road approaches, Station
Buildings, Staff Qtrs, Other Service buildings, HL Platforms, COPs, FOBs, P.Way Work, General electrical
work and S&T Work from Km 157 to Km 225 of Yavatmal-Nanded New BG Line Project In Nagpur Division
Of Central Railway In State Of Maharashtra.”
On 25th of July 2022, TYPSA received the LOA (No. RVNL/MUMBAI/YTL-NED/DD&PMC) and on 3 rd of August
2022, Kick-off meeting was held at RVNL office.
The new railway line stretching between Wardha and Nanded via Yavatmal was a long pending demand of
the people. It is considered as one of the most important projects as it will connect the two most backward
districts of Vidarbha and Marathwada namely
Yavatmal and Nanded as it can transform the
economy of both the regions. Firstly, it will provide
support to the local farmers with the provision of
transportation facilities and secondly, the track
passes through 16 villages of Wardha district, 92
villages in Yavatmal district and 30 villages in
Nanded district. One can imagine the economic
revolution these 138 villages would witness when
the railway link comes into existence.
The final alignment and L-sections has already been prepared by RVNL. As understood from the kick off
meeting, private land required for the project has already been acquired and forest land is under stage 1 of
clearance and final clearance is expected in a month.
The services with TYPSA are divided into three phases i.e. Pre-Construction Phase for Detailed Design
including review of investigation for tunnels (6 months), Construction Supervision Stage (42 months) and
Defect Liability Period (6 months).
The project scope broadly consists of Pre-Construction Detailed Design Services and Project Construction
Management Services of various works of the project.
Tunnel works for a length of 7350m approx. long with the works of earthwork
Ballast less Track
Bridges including major bridges, minor bridges, ROBs & RUBs
Station Buildings
P. Way Works
General Electrical work
S&T work
TUNNELS
1 Belgaon Halt
2 Pusad Crossing
3 Harshi Crossing
4 Shilona Halt
5 Palsi Crossing
6 Umerkhed Crossing
Considering the above scope of services, specific tasks to be performed by the consultant in the realisation
of the scope of services as mentioned in the TOR are given below in brief:
The Consultant shall study the available data and reports and propose further investigations
required for the project. A foot-by-foot Reconnaissance survey at critical locations along the
proposed alignment, duly checking various geographical features and access modifications, if any
on the alignment as per the site conditions shall be carried out in the initial stage.
The Consultant shall devise the approach, design criteria and construction methodology and
identify the codes and standards to be followed for the project.
Following up the consultant shall submit an Inception Report for acceptance to RVNL.
The Consultant shall study and finalise the Alignment and L-sections after discussions with the
Client officials and recommend the best option.
The Consultant shall prepare Design Basis Report and conduct Project Risk Assessment along with
management of risk to ensure reduction to a level as low as reasonably practical during planning,
design, procurement and construction stage. Also, preparation of Geotechnical Baseline Report
along with Survey Reports, Validation of Project Control points shall be taken up.
The Consultant shall follow the codes and standards as suggested during the design process.
The Consultant shall submit the Pre-Final design as per the timelines for acceptance to RVNL.
The Consultant shall prepare and submit the tender documents for construction of tunnels, bridges,
formation and associated works, Track work and S&T.
The Consultant shall prepare and submit Quality Plan, Safety Plan, Environmental Mitigation Plan,
Disaster Management Plan specific to the site requirements.
The Consultant shall in detail work on the Tunnels for finalisation of longitudinal profile and cross-
section drawings along with BOQ, detailed rate analysis and specifications for materials and
equipments. Also, preparation of tender documents, specifications and BOQ of Ballast-less track for
all tunnels, bridges etc. shall be taken up.
The Consultant shall prepare detailed design of Tunnels, Bridges, Yard works and other structures
along with Technical Specifications. Also, detailed design of E&M systems design shall be taken up
along with assisting RVNL to obtain clearance from statutory bodies such as Local fire, service,
electrical inspectorate, pollution control boards etc. and coordination with civic bodies for works
related with E&M systems.
Apart from providing design services, the Consultant shall also assist RVNL in the Tendering
process and Bid evaluations till award of contract.
Further, design support during construction phase shall be there by the Consultant wherein Good
for construction drawings shall be provided on time to the successful bidder. Detailed reviewing
and monitoring along with construction supervision of Earthwork, bridges, ROBs, RUBs, Tunnels
and associated structures, TVS, E&M works, Track linking- ballasted & ballast less, S&T and
building structures shall be taken up by the Consultant.
The Consultant shall prepare Project Management Plan and ensure Quality assurance, project
controlling and monitoring, conflict and change management, measurement and payment.
The Consultant shall timely monitor, record & report the progress to RVNL for verification and
further submit the reports and documents. Regular inspection and monitoring of the project will be
an integral part of the process.
At the time of Project handover, As-built drawings shall be collected and checked by Consultant
from the Contractor and any defects and modifications shall be listed out consequently in the post-
Construction phase (DLP).
TYPSA is an independent consulting and engineering services group and a leader in infrastructure,
energy, environmental and city solutions. The Group has over 50 years’ experience supporting public,
private and institutional clients in developing transport, water, buildings, renewable energy, and rural
developments, from concept through to commissioning and operation.
sustainability and integrity standards, which enables it to participate in emblematic projects on the five
continents and has contributed to its long track-record with International Financing Institutions. The Group
is growing through innovation, introducing full potential of BIM and virtual reality across the whole buildings
and infrastructure lifecycle with a circular economy approach, creating asset management platforms and
developing new value-engineering solutions.
Engineering Services
TYPSA offers clients quality and high added value services tailored to meet specific technical, management
or analysis and supervision requirements.
11 viaducts (3500m)
RVNL functions as an extended arm of the Ministry of Railways working for & on behalf of MoR. It is
empowered to act as an Umbrella SPV to undertake project development, resource mobilization etc.
directly or by creating project specific SPVs or by any other financing structure found suitable.
RVNL ANTHEM - The 3 pillars of RVNL – Quality, Speed & Transparency, and the focus of the organisation is
to provide Indian Railways and the country modern infrastructure.
Project development,
financing and
implementation of projects INCEPTION REPORT |PAGE 22 OF 164
related to rail infrastructure
infrastructure assets human resources for
including contractual rights project implementation
Detailed Design and Project
Management Consultancy services for the
and obligations
New BG Line Project from Km 157 to Km 225 of Yavatmal-Nanded
section
RVNL
An infrastructure Project
execution Company committed to Ensure timely execution of
sustainable development and projects with least cost
environment-friendly construction escalation
practices of rail related projects in
the country
Maintain a cost-effective
organizational set-up
This Report is a record and summary of the design concepts for major aspects of the project to be
considered as the basis for the development of further detailed stages. The report also gathers and
identifies instructions and requirements form the Client along with principal concepts and assumptions.
The Inception Report is targeted to be submitted in compliance with the TOR and RFP and is one of the first
submissions of the project. The final copy of the submission is with the timeline, and we appreciate
coordination of RVNL in providing the required data. The report is a part of the first deliverable which is due
on 06.09.2022.
The report should include the following (with necessary maps/figures/diagrams/graphs etc)
An introduction narrating the project background, purpose of study, objective and scope of services
and activities to be performed.
Analysis and findings from reconnaissance survey including problems and possible solutions.
A detailed review of available data and reports which will form the base for moving ahead in the
project. An assessment of all additional data required, and survey works to be carried out for
completion of database for the project.
The Approach and Method statement to meet the requirement of Deliverables and Services as per
Terms of Reference (TOR).
An outline of Design Criteria adopted and Construction Methodology for the project.
Identifications of Design Codes and Standards
A detailed report on review and identification of the possible refinements in the existing alignment
based on techno economic issues, port allocations, geology, and yard layout considerations with
recommendations.
Preparation of detailed work programme of design work identifying key performance indicators, list
of personnel along with role and responsibility.
Refinement of Alignment
Any changes in the Alignment shall be avoided as the land under Forest Department has been
acquired and any proposed changes cannot get approved at this stage.
The starting and end chainage of the tunnels are tentative and shall be finalised by the Consultant
based on the final design of the approaches and an economical and optimum cut-fill approach.
RVNL has been granted the 207km stretch of Yavatmal-Nanded section out of which 68km from Km 157 to
Km 225 has been entrusted to TYPSA for Detailed Design and Project Management Consultancy Services
for “Construction Of Five Tunnels (Approx. Total Length 7.35 km) between Digras-Palshi Stations
including Construction Of Roadbed, Major Bridges, minor bridges, ROBs, RUBs, including road
approaches, Station Buildings, Staff Qtrs, Other Service buildings, HL Platforms, COPs, FOBs, P.Way
Work, General electrical work and S&T Work from Km 157 to Km 225 of Yavatmal-Nanded New BG
Line Project In Nagpur Division Of Central Railway In State Of Maharashtra.”
Our expert Mr. Mahender Kumar Sharma has visited entire Proposed Alignment along with RVNL’s
representative Mr. Nilesh Panwar (Site Supervisor) on 27th & 28th of August 2021 under guidance of
DGM/Civil/RVNL/Nagpur.
DATA COLLECTED
Site Photographs
The proposed alignment passes through five tunnels (Approx. Total Length 7.35km).
TUNNEL – 1:
Alignment close to live Quarry & habitations- we need to comply all safety procedures.
TUNNEL – 2:
Alignment passing through Dense Forest Area - we need to comply all environmental procedures.
TUNNEL – 3:
TUNNEL – 4:
TUNNEL – 5:
It has water bodies nearby alignment, this needs to be thoroughly studied before design.
Kick-off meeting with RVNL was conducted on 03.08.2022 at RVNL’s office, wherein TYPSA’s and RVNL’s
attendees were present, and the meeting was targeted on discussing the base elements of the project and
other project planning activities. RVNL and TYPSA discussed the way forward for the project.
ATTENDEES
TYPSA gave a brief presentation mentioning about the scope of works, team program, work program,
project deliverables, organisation chart during Pre-Construction and Construction Phase, setting up of
Project Office at Nagpur, data collected, and data required from RVNL. RVNL expects TYPSA to work
efficiently during the entire Project lifecycle and come up with innovative designs and strategies in the
Detailed Design as well as Project Management phase adopting the best practices in the world.
Minutes of the Kick-off meeting are given in Annexure-2.
RVNL conveyed to the Consultant that private land required for the project has already been
acquired and Forest land is under stage 1 of clearance which is expected to get in next 1 month,
and final clearance is expected in a month.
Geotechnical Investigations and Geological Surveys have already been done by the Client. RVNL
has a Geotech Agency which can help with any further required data and consultant can intimate
RVNL for further investigations which can be carried out either by TYPSA itself or by RVNL’s
associated Agency and the same shall be financed by RVNL.
RVNL suggested to follow Indian standards and General standard practices involved in other parts.
For tunnel designs, superstructure of non-standard spans, substructure and foundations of major
bridges, the consultant shall support RVNL for getting the designs proof checked by IIT/NITs or
from any independent agency appointed by RVNL. Also, RVNL suggested to adopt RDSO
procedures for superstructure.
RVNL showed keen interest in Innovativeness in Design, Cost Effectiveness, State of the Art and
adopting best practices in the world.
RVNL informed that axle loading of 25tonne shall be adopted for all design works for the project.
In detail minutes of the meeting are attached as Annexure-3. Presentation during the Kick-off meeting is
attached as Annexure-4.
Interface Management is the process that facilitates agreements between different stakeholders of the
Project regarding roles and responsibilities, timing for providing interface information and identification of
critical interfaces early in the project through a structured procedure. The overall goal is to identify in time
those issues which have potential for impact on cost, quality, or schedule, to minimize or remove their
impact and promote clear, accurate, timely and consistent communication between different entities for
exchanging interface information.
Interface management supports project teams to mitigate interface-related risks by controlling interface
issues from an early stage of the project life cycle, as well as by building collaboration and lines of
communication between project participants. Documenting interfaces and providing solid communication
allows different contracting parties to be aligned and helps establish clear lines of responsibility and scope
whilst bridging the space between them.
Coordination with internal/ external bodies applies throughout the whole project life cycle. Considering the
scope of work involved, identifying, and defining interfaces early is crucial to the successful delivery of the
project within the timelines. A separate team for the interface shall specifically task to not only look into
intra-interface requirements but also to have extensive and elaborate stakeholder involved. Interfacing with
other agencies is also envisaged like government/ private agencies, local authorities, statutory bodies etc.
3.4.1.Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to describe the Interface Management practices that shall be adopted by the
General Consultant of RVNL, Consultant, with the objective of ensuring that the designated contractors and
other role-playing participants within and outside the Project understand and discharge their
responsibilities towards each other in a seamless and coordinated manner in order to achieve smooth and
flawless execution of the project
The process of Interface management is applicable to all interface managing activities required to be
performed by the designated Interface Managers, in consent with the Interface Coordinator of the
Consultant and his delegates, through all stages of the Project are as follows:
Pre-final Design
Tender Design
Final Design
Construction Supervision
DLP
3.4.3.Types of Interfaces
External Interface: This refers to any interface between consultant and third parties not directly
engaged in the project.
Project Interface: This refers to any interface between the consultant and any other contractors
engaged in the project.
Internal Interface: This refers to any interface that exists between two or more disciplines within the
scope of work.
Types of Interfaces
The outcome is improved project performance and a reduction in the probability of costly mistakes and
reworks. Successful interface management can lead to avoidance of time-consuming disputes,
guaranteeing complete understanding of, and agreement with, all decisions regarding project interface
issues.
Agreement between the different parties involved in an external interface is essential. Therefore, the
Consultant’s interface meetings must be held periodically and shall be attended by representatives from the
Client and stakeholders responsible for the relevant interfaces. The purpose of meetings and workshops is
to maintain the integrity of the interfaces by ensuring that:
Parties on both sides are working towards the same interface baseline.
All system changes are evaluated for related impact regarding interface(s).
No changes are accepted without formal approval on both sides of the interface.
Before the submission of a documentation package, workshops will be held to create a common
baseline and identify conflicts/clashes and grey areas.
A brief site visit in the pre-inception stage, is executed with a purpose to determine the technical
feasibility of the proposed alignment and its functional constructability. For efficient and plentiful site
reconnaissance, advance preparations are important such as gathering of information about the
terrain, access roads, nearby habitations, socio-economic condition of the area, flood levels and other
relevant information. The following field data is collected during the site visit:
The engineers responsible from various disciplines, based on the above data, prepare a detailed
project report instructing the due further course of action and also describing the additional field
investigations and activities required. The site visit also develops an understanding within the minds
of the engineers to better comprehend the ground conditions which is positively reflected in the
designs.
4.1.1.Team
For the purpose of site visit technical experts from all the major concerned divisions visited the site to
develop a practical understanding and present their individual technical suggestions on terrain,
topology, survey, alignment, tunnel, structural feasibility, project planning and execution and other
similar works.
The site visit team comprised of representatives from RVNL to assist the experts from the consultant
visiting the site:
To carry out the site visit, the entire team was divided into two groups. Group 1 comprised Mr.
Ramanjaneyulu, Mr. Bhudev and Mr. Vijay Kopatta assisted by Mr. Rahul Garg to visit the start and end
approaches of the tunnel locations. The objective of this team was to understand and physically verify
the basic terrain, morphology, soil type, rock type and overburden at the tunnel location, with an
objective to also device the most practical approach methodology for the execution activities.
Group 2 is comprised of Mr. Suhas Deshmukh, Mr. Patra, Mr. Anish Thakur, Mr. Navneet Jassi, Mr.
Malay Sameer Agarwal and Mr. Vijay Kumar to visit the structure locations of major bridges, minor
bridges, RUBs and ROBs. The objective of this team was to visit the important structure locations to
develop an actual understanding of the site. The team focused on taking pictures at the crossing
location and verifying the proposed span in the RFP with the actual site condition. The team also
focused on visiting the existing structures on the proposed crossings for design reference and
spanning details.
A field visit format as attached in Annexure XXX was carried by the team on site to collect the possible
details. Filled in formats with data as collected from the site is attached in the Annexure XXX for
reference.
An important and critical observation made by the design team on site was that the area is prone to
flash floods in monsoons. Picture 1 was captured on 08 Aug 2022 when the water level in Pus River
surpassed the road level of the bridge over Pus River, completely disconnecting the two sides of the
city. The water level was almost 1.5 feet above the road level stagnating traffic for more than 8 hours.
It has been observed by the team to make considerations for flash floods in all its hydraulic designs
and also consider for the debris and erosion material carried by the river during flood.
The data collected from RVNL was analysed and additional data was requested further, as mentioned
in 4.3.
Apart from the initial data collected from RVNL as mentioned in the TOR, a list of additional data was
received as mentioned below.
Alignment from Final location survey report shall be studied in detail and reviewed critically to identify any
technical or feasibility shortcomings in design. The consultant also shall review the proposed, available
ROW and acquired land details based on the latest location survey to develop a clear understanding of the
acquired land.
Consultant shall also re-verify the topography data shared by RVNL which was conducted in 2018-19 to
identify its fineness for the detailed design. Any discrepancy identified in the data shall be reported and
discussed with the client for the most appropriate mitigation method.
The validated survey and land detail data shall hence be used for the detailed design of the alignment.
Understanding the practical constraints in acquiring additional land, the consultant shall attempt to fit the
final detailed alignment within the acquired ROW considering the specifications mentioned in TOR,
approved basic design planning parameters, relevant Indian Railway Standards & codes and other
internationally accepted practices.
The Vertical alignment design which is liable for modifications pertaining to any changes in Horizontal
alignment shall also be redesigned/ adjusted appropriately. In connection to these modifications, the
consultant shall design crossings, stations, tunnels, ROBs, RUBs, FOBs and other structures and
accordingly respective span configurations shall be suggested.
5.1. Survey
5.2. Alignment
The Yavatmal-Nanded New BG Line Project is a 278km project targeting to bless the two backward regions
of Maharashtra with a single BG railway line. The alignment connects Yavatmal to Nanded via Dharwa,
Digras, Pusad and Umarkhed. The proposal aims to ease the moment of local people and also boost the
agricultural and socioeconomic development of the entire region by connecting it with the main railway
network. The scope of this package extends from Km 157 to Km 225 of the entire 278km Project.
The alignment from km 157 to 225 has 6 proposed stations, namely Belgaon, Pusad, Harshi , Shilona, Palsi
and Umerkhed of which Belgaon and Shilona have been proposed as Halt stations, while the remaining
four stations are proposed as Crossing stations. The primary highlight of the package is the proposal of 5
tunnels in the stretch which have been proposed due to the hilly terrain and also to persevere the natural
flora and fauna and to provide safe animal crossing to the wildlife residing in the tropical forest of the
region. The five tunnels, comprising a total length of 7.350 km (approx.) have been proposed of which the
longest single tunnel is 2.7 km long while the shortest tunnel is 350 m long. The details of the tunnel are as:
In addition to the tunnels there are 24 major bridges, 65 minor bridges, 13 ROBs and 29 RUBs in this
package which shall be designed by the consultant as per the predetermined standards, codes and
practices.
The technical design basis for the package has been determined based on the requirements of the RFP
and specifications as per the Indian Railways standards where applicable or as per the internationally
accepted codes of practice and specifications as necessary.
The listed parameters shall be used by the consultant for the detailed design and validation of the
alignment and track design, associated structures, embankment, bridges, utilities and services but shall not
be limited to as mentioned below.
The Parameters for Horizontal Alignment and track design shall be as under:
1 Standard of Construction Formation, Bridge and Track to be designed for 25 MT Axle load.
2 Gauge 1676 mm BG
5 Sleeper density 1660 sleepers per km in the main line and 1540 nos. in the loop line.
6 Ballast cushion Mainline with 300mm and Loop lines with 250 mm.
10 Curve Radius
In isolated & exceptional cases, subject to prior approval of RVNL
(Client) – Not to exceed 3 Degree (583.3 Meter)
Maximum grade on approach As flat as possible, consistent with site conditions and not steeper
15
to main river bridges than 1in 200 compensated.
17
25
- Desirable 50 m
- Allowable 0m
4
- Desirable 755 m (i.e., one train length) As per IR norms
- Allowable NIL
5.2.2.Approach
The consultant will conceptualize the vision of planning and developing the alignment to achieve the
objectives as per the TOR and approved technical parameters from Employer (RVNL) and, based on the
same, requirements of the Employer shall be transformed for development of the best suitable alignment
for the Yavatmal – Nanded project
As part of the Final Location Survey and Preparation of Detailed Design report, the following approach and
methodology is considered for finalizing the alignment design.
5.2.2.1. Inputs
The various inputs for the study and preparation of the Alignment Report are as below.
5.2.2.2. Actvities
The list of activities to be undertaken as a part of detailed alignment design are as shown as under:
The primary stage of Alignment design begins from checking and filtering of 3D topographic survey data
containing 3D polylines of all important existing features and cross-sectional point data. The 3D
topographical data is filtered to remove all the unnecessary data, null points and rouge points, followed by
the triangulation of data to generate a 3D surface mesh in the design software. The triangulated surface is
further reviewed to identify for any improper meshing and is hence rectified. The final file is used as 3D
surface for HAL and VAL design.
The alignment design received from RVNL from the FLS stage is loaded in the design software along with
the Land details and acquired ROW data. The design is reviewed and re-evaluated to meet the technical
and feasibility parameters and fit within the acquired ROW while providing the best engineering solution for
all the major and minor crossing locations. The HAL is designed to avoid any avoidable speed restrictions
while considering a route best suitable for vertical alignment design.
The final horizontal alignment design is used as the parent file for the vertical alignment design. The 3D
surface mesh along with design HAL is loaded in the design software. The Surface profile for the HAL is
generated in the software, on which the proposed formation level is designed as per the technical
parameters and codes of practices. The crossings with minimum required formation levels as per
hydrographic calculations and minimum clearance is marked in the profile. These points serve as
obligatory points for the profile design. The final VAL design is hence done to meet the minimum design
level.
The final HAL and VAL designs are finally submitted as Plan and Profile and other reports. The Deliverables
for Detailed design shall be as listed below:
Final Alignment Design outputs including soft copies of design files in the used software along with
the alignment design outputs such as Index map, Index Plan & L-section, detailed Plan & Profile
drawings including crossing details, station and yard locations and GAD’s.
Feasibility Field Report of Expert Team of various bridges, deep cuttings, high embankments,tunnel
portals, access roads and other structures.
Input/output Data files of alignment design in soft copy used Autodesk 3D Civil/Bentley Rail Track
or similar software for the future use of RVNL.
Geo-referenced Geological maps/ Topographical sheets/ Forest maps etc. with superimposition of
final alignment on them, suitable for GIS application.
Soft copy (editable format) and printed copy of all documents obtained and used by the consultant during
the alignment design such as maps, topo sheets, line maps, DGPS data, DEMs, Bentley Rail or similar
software files, Geological mapping and, geological survey etc. of the study area along with submission of
final report, design and developed level maps shall be handed over to RVNL. Hard copies should be of
manageable size and preferably bound.
The design and execution of all works and estimations shall confirm to the specifications in the below
mentioned codes of practices, until any otherwise specified and provided in written by the client to the
consultant or vice-verse.
Indian Railway Standard Specification for fabrication and erection of steel girders
Guidelines and Specifications for Design of formation for Heavy Axle Loads- GE 14.
The following codes of Practice shall be followed generally unless otherwise specified otherwise. In the
absence of relevant provision of specifications in the under mentioned BIS/IRS/IRC codes, the reference
shall be made to international codes/best available engineering practice but with the approval of Engineer
–in- charge of RVNL.
IS: 4081-1967- Safety Code for Blasting and Related drilling operations.
IS: 823-1964 - Code of procedure for manual metal Arc welding of mild steel.
IS: 816-1969 -Code of practice for use of Metal Arc welding for General Construction in Mild steel.
IS: 1566-1967- Hard Drawn steel wise fabric for Concrete reinforcement.
IS: 1200 (Part-XXV) 1971-- Methods of Measurement of Building and Civil Engineering works.
IS: 800- 1962-Code of Practice for use of Structural steel in General Building Construction.
IS 11384 – Code of Practice for Composite Construction for Structural Steel and Concrete.
IS 2339 for Aluminium Paint ready mix; IS 2062 for Structural Steel
IS 961-1975 Indian Standard Specifications for Structural Steel (High tensile) revised SR-58-HTC
grade with copper content of 0.2 to 0.35 per cent shall be used for the High Tensile steel items.
IS 1149-1973-for High tensile steel rivet bars for structural purpose, with copper content of 0.2 to
0.35 per cent;
As per Annexure 1 to A&C-2 DD & PMC of YTL-NED (Revised), Clause 1.2, the Decision of Engineer
regarding the interpretation of specification shall be final and binding on the contractor.
This section highlights the general requirements, guidelines, design philosophy and parameters to
be adopted while conducting geotechnical and geophysical investigations at the site. Reference
As understood during the site visit that bore-logs for the bridges has been conducted by another
agency. For designing geotechnical interpretative report are required for all bridges. Requesting
RVNL to kindly provide the same for foundation design of the structures.
This section deals with the design basis to be adopted for hydrological and hydraulic calculations. It
highlights the general requirements, guidelines, design philosophy and design parameters for the design of
hydrology & hydraulics for culverts, minor, major & important bridges. In addition to the design data
particulars specified in the RBF-16 documents, key design data extracted from the reference design
Rainfall for designing waterway crossings is taken from isopluvial maps published by CWC in their Flood
Estimation Reports. Isopluvial maps are available in 1 in 25 years, 1 in 50 years and 1 in 100 years.
The catchment areas for all the important and major bridges shall be carried out on 1:50000 scale
topographical maps procured from the Survey of India. The maps shall be georeferenced, and catchments
shall be drawn using AutoCAD. All the catchment properties shall be generated from the drawing.
Catchment is for all minor bridges shall be calculated from field survey data based on block levels taken at
the site. The catchment area will be marked identifying the change in ground levels. Further the discharge
quantities shall be validated considering the opening size of the existing highway bridge and HFL’s if
available.
Discharge calculation
Rational/SUH method – Based on the catchment area, one of the following methods shall be used for
Rational Method – Rational method is a semi deterministic method used for smaller catchments of
The modified rational method as described in RBF-16 issued by RDSO shall be used for the current project.
· SUH method – Synthetic Unit Hydrograph method is used for larger catchments ranging from
25sq.km to 5000sq.km. The flood estimation reports published by CWC based on their research
along with the Ministry of Railways, RDSO, IMD and Ministry of transport. The formulae given in the
subzone manual will be used for determination of peak discharge for the specified return period.
· Scour Calculations
· The scour calculations shall be done based on the hydraulic parameters (like discharge, clear
span, silt factors, linear waterway etc.) available at the bridge location and the type & depth of
· The scour calculations shall be done as per cl. 4.6.3, cl. 4.6.4 and 4.5.3 of IRS Substructure code -
2013. The silt factors for each layer encountered in the geotechnical investigation are generally
given in the GIR reports based on sieve analysis done for each strata. If the silt factors are not
provided in GIR reports, it shall be determined based on the relation given in cl. 4.6.5 of IRS
m = weighted mean diameter of the bed material. In the absence of silt factors in GIR reports, typical values
of silt factors for given bed material can be assumed as given in cl. 4.6.5 of IRS substructure code which is
tabulated below:
Design discharge for foundations and protection works shall be increased to provide adequate margin of
safety against abnormal flood of magnitude higher than design discharge as below as per clause 4.4 of IRS
Catchment more than 500sq.km and up to 30% to 20% (decreasing with increase
5,000sq.km. in
area)
Catchment more than 5,000sq.km. and up to 20% to 10% (decreasing with increase
in
25,000sq.km.
area)
5.5. Structures
This section highlights the general requirements, guidelines, design philosophy and design parameters that
shall be adopted for the designs of railway bridges, culverts, Road Over Bridges, Road Under Bridges, Foot
Over Bridges, Cover Over Platform, Staff Quarters & Stations Buildings. The bridges shall be designed as
per relevant IRS Codes in general. However, reference shall be made to various IRC Codes and other
International Codes (UIC, Euro, etc), if IRS Codes do not adequately address the design-related issues
The Maximum Moving Dimensions (MMD) and Schedule of Dimensions (SOD) to be adopted for a
structure shall be as per the Indian Railways with the following modifications:
As per chapter IV (A) maximum width of overall projection at 102 mm above rail Level, when fully
As per chapter IV (A) maximum width of overall projection at 305 mm above rail Level, when fully
As per Table 16 of SOD, Formation width for the single track (in embankment) shall be considered
As per Table 16 of SOD, minimum width in cutting (excluding side drain) shall be considered as
Typical Maximum Moving Dimensions (MMD) and embankment width details for different cases as per
The minimum vertical clearance for bridges excluding pipe culverts, box culverts, arch bridges, and siphons
from the water level of design discharge shall be in accordance with the Code of Practice for The Design of
0- 30 600
The Free Board from the water level of the design discharge to the formation level of the Railway
Embankment or the type of guide bund shall be not less than 1m as per cl. 4.9.1 if IRS Substructure code.
Vertical Clearance at RUBs shall be at least 5m. However, for national highways, state highways and urban
areas, this should be increased to 5.5m. Lateral and vertical Clearances at RUBs for Vehicular Traffic shall
be as shown below:
As per NHAI Circular dated 20/06/2011, the minimum lateral clearance required for any structure shall be as
follows:
As per IRSOD for the Indian Railways minimum lateral clearance required for any structure (other than
Table 3: Min. Lateral clearance for any structure other than the platform
Minimum horizontal distance from any building on a passenger platform from centre line of track are:
5180 mm increasing
uniformly to 5330 mm
level 5330mm
From 3430mm above rail level to 4115mm above rail level 5330 mm decreasing
in case of existing works uniformly to 3810 mm
From 3430mm above rail level to 4610mm above rail level 5330 mm decreasing
in case of new works or alterations uniformly to 3810 mm
to existing works
Description (mm)
The loads and load combinations which shall be referred to for preliminary designs of all the railway
Permanent and Transient Loads as mentioned in the table below shall be considered for the design of the
bridges based on the provisions given in the relevant codes (mentioned in section 5.4.8).
The Load Combinations for all loads other than Earthquake Loads shall be as per Table 12 of IRS Concrete
Bridge Code – 2014. For Earthquake Load Combinations, Cl 7.0 of IRS Seismic Code shall be referred.
5.5.3.3 Loads and Load Combination for Road Over Bridge Design (ROBs)
All the relevant loads mentioned in IRC 6-2017 shall be considered for the design of Substructure and
Foundations.
5.5.3.3.3 Loads and Load Combination for Station Buildings & Foot Over Bridges (FOBs)
All the relevant loads mentioned in IS 875 Part 1, 2 & 3 shall be considered for the design of station
buildings and Foot Over Bridges.
5.5.3.3.4 Load Combination for Station Buildings & Foot Over Bridges (FOBs)
The load combinations to be followed for the design of station buildings shall be as per table 18 of IS
456:2000.
The load combinations to be followed for the design of Foot Over Bridges (FOBs) shall be as per Table 4 of
IS:800 - 2007.
During the course of finalization of span of bridge data with reference to the GAD provided by client, field
studies shall be carried out by the Bridge Engineer at all-important crossing locations and other proposed
locations requiring field observations and collection of field data and photographs of their surrounding
areas, to the extent required for finalization of the bridge under consideration and checking infringement
For inputs in the estimate, the drawings of box culverts shall be adopted as per available RDSO drawings.
For intervening sizes, if any interpolation based on available RFP and RDSO drawings shall be done and for
For the purpose of estimation of cost, standard RDSO superstructures shall be adopted corresponding to
25T Axle loading (IR Loading). Wherever non-standard Superstructures are required to be provided, the
Sub-structure and Foundation design considerations the drawings available in the database from similar
projects depending on the size of span and type of foundation etc., for estimation purpose.
For the purpose of estimation of cost, the detailed design of the foundation shall not be prepared. However,
The size and type of foundation shall be worked out based on load, bearing capacity and scour
depth etc.
different type of foundation as per the 4GADs and preliminary design of structures.
Reinforced Concrete of grade M-25 to M-50 will be used in different structural elements of Box
culverts, Return walls, Piers, Abutments, Foundations, components of Station buildings {slabs,
beams columns, footings. Modular Ratio in the elastic analysis shall be considered as per Cl 5.2.6 of
5.5.7.1Bearings
The bearings for all the Major Bridges, Major RUBs and ROBs shall be Elastomeric or POT/PTFE type,
shall be used as per the instructions of the Ministry of Railways vide circular no. 2014/CE- III/BR/Bridge
Expansion joints shall be provided (as per Standard RDSO drawings) to be capable of accommodating all
translations and rotations between the adjacent superstructures without damage. They shall be capable of
An inspection platform shall be provided around the piers for inspection of bearings.
Suitable access shall be provided to the top of pier caps at selected locations.
Suitable Inspection arrangements shall be done for access to superstructures, substructures and
5.5.8 Preparation of Bridge list for the finalized alignment and generation of drawings.
5.5.8.1 Inputs
In this stage, bridges and structures required along the selected horizontal alignment will be studied in
detail. Various inputs available from field reconnaissance data, topo sheets, Orthophotos, LiDAR Survey,
ongoing geotechnical investigations and hydrological investigations, like ground levels, HFL details of
major & important bridges, bore log data made available by the geo-tech investigation, etc., shall be
considered.
5.5.8.2 Activities
In this stage, a list of crossings that are required in selected alignment to cross various streams, roads and
highways, other railways, required structures based on topographic details collected during the
reconnaissance survey, will be finalized. Proposed Span configuration and type of superstructure,
substructure and foundation, for each crossing, will also be finalized. The minimum formation level required
for the alignment at bridge locations shall be worked out and shall be given as input for the design of the
vertical alignment.
The following shall be the criteria for working out the minimum formation level for a different type of
openings:
Box culverts (waterway): - HFL + Min. Freeboard + thickness of box as per opening size.
Box culverts (RUBs):- Road level + Min. vertical clearance for road traffic (as per IRC guidelines) +
thickness of box as per opening size.
Waterway bridges: - HFL + Min. Vertical clearance as per the discharge @ Bridge location (as per
Road Over Bridges / Rail Fly Overs: - Min. Vertical clearance above Rail Level (as per SOD of Indian
These minimum formation levels at various locations along the alignment shall be used as input for the
Generally, for small drains, cart roads and balancing culverts, RCC box type bridges (culverts) shall be
recommended. Assessment of scour shall be carried out for major streams and canals accordingly suitable
protection/ openings shall be considered in the estimation. In the case of waterways, the opening sizes
shall be considered as per the hydraulic requirements to cater to the discharge at the bridge location. In the
case of box type bridges (culverts) for cart roads, the opening sizes shall be considered as per the existing
road width, traffic on the road, and type of vehicles to be catered for. In warranting cases, changes likely to
occur in discharge or type of road or vehicles, in the foreseeable future, shall be taken into account.
Standard RDSO drawings shall be adopted for box type bridges (culverts), to the extent feasible. If the width
of the opening required is more than the width mentioned in the standard RDSO drawings, the next higher
available width of the RCC box in the RDSO drawings shall be adopted.
The clear height of the box type bridges shall be calculated based on the difference between formation
level and existing bed level at the bridge location, the depth required as per calculated discharge or
roadway requirement and available standard depths of box culverts as per RDSO drawings.
Wherever non-standard box type bridges are anticipated, preliminary sizes of structural elements (slabs
and wall thickness) shall be ascertained based on relevant RDSO drawings with similar or next higher size.
The embankment fill, wherever provided, shall be considered in a slope of 2H:1V and the barrel length of
the box culvert shall be provided, accordingly. At locations where poor soil conditions are met with low
Box culverts shall be proposed with square return walls, as the same cause the least infringement with
existing infrastructure and would be advantageous particularly when the proposed alignment is running
parallel to the existing rail track. The cross-section of return walls shall be finalised based on preliminary
calculations, duly considering the Safe Bearing Capacity of soil available at the respective bridge location.
Stone pitching shall be provided for the fill outside the return wall. A Toe wall shall be proposed at the end
of the stone pitching to avoid slippage of soil from the embankment.
Clause No. 205 of IRS Bridge Manual 2020. The typical cross-section of the toe wall along with stone
Drop wall and Curtainwall of appropriate design shall be provided on the downstream and upstream sides
of the bridge to avoid scour at the proposed bridge location. Stone flooring shall be provided between the
box and drop/curtain wall to protect the box against the scouring action. In case the load at the bottom of
the box exceeds the safe bearing capacity of soil available at the bridge location, suitable ground
improvement shall be recommended to disperse the load from the bottom of the box to a wider area.
5.5.9.1 Superstructure
standard spans available from RDSO drawings, available topographic, hydrological and geotechnical data.
The superstructure shall be considered as per standard RDSO drawings corresponding to IR loading (25T
axle load), RDSO standard span of 6.1m, 9.15m, 12.2m, 18.3m & 24.4m are available and shall be composite
Girders, PSC Slab or PSC Girders (based on preliminary design) shall be recommended. Composite girders
and PSC girders allow the ballasted track to be provided on the deck with LWR and are also suitable for the
track on curves. However, where sufficient vertical clearance to facilitate the provision of this type of girders
is not available, steel plate girders as per RDSO Standard drawings with open deck shall be considered.
5.5.9.2 Substructure
Substructures shall be of Reinforced cement concrete with a grade of concrete varying from M30 to M50.
Considering the economy of substructures, the type of abutments shall vary as per the height available at
the bridge location. For heights of the abutment (from FL to top of foundation) up to 10m (approximate),
cantilever type abutments shall be followed. For larger heights of counterfort type abutments / Spill through
abutments shall be adopted. The Length of abutment shall be greater than or equal to the formation width
to retain the embankment fill. Square return walls shall be proposed behind the abutments. The length of
the return wall shall depend on the height of the embankment and the slope of pitching.
Piers shall be of oblong type (rectangular pier with semi-circular ends) with a uniform cross-section
throughout the height / multiple columns shall be proposed. The dimensions of the pier cap shall be so
fixed that it caters for the provision of the seismic restrainer, OHE mast and space for the Trolley refuge
5.5.9.3 Foundation
Type of foundations to be adopted shall depend on the scour depths and the nature of substrata available
at the bridge location. Accordingly, the foundations may vary from open foundations, pile foundations or
well foundations. Generally, for major bridges, pile foundations are envisaged. Piles of 1.2m / 1.5m dia shall
be generally proposed. Where scour depths are high and for large spans, well foundations shall be
proposed. Wells shall be of Circular / Double-D type based on the condition to be provided on the bridge
The results of tests shall be interpreted and decision on types and size of foundations shall be taken as per
Type of
below the bed surface provided there is a good bearing stratum is available,
and the foundation is protected against scour. The minimum depth of open
Open
foundations shall be up to stratum having safe bearing capacity but not less
1 Foundation
than 1.75 m below the anticipated scour level or the protected bed level.
2 Pile The minimum diameter of piles shall be 1.0m. In soil, the minimum depth of
Foundation foundations below the point of fixity should be the minimum length required
for developing full fixity. In rocks, the pile should be taken down to rock strata
devoid of any likely extension of erosion and properly socketed as required by
the design.
The outer sides of the well should preferably be vertical. In special cases,
small offsets may be allowed. The horizontal cross-section should satisfy the
following requirements:
also provide the necessary weight for sinking and adequate strength
against forces acting on the steining, both during the sinking of the
3 Well
Foundation
c. It should accommodate the base of the substructure and not cause
d. The overall size should be sufficient to transmit the loads to the soil
and
e. It should allow for the permissible tilt and shift of the well.
The depth of foundations shall be decided with respect to scour and stability.
The depth of the foundation shall not be less than 1.33 times the deepest
scour below HFL. This may however be reduced wherever unerodable strata,
such as rock is available at a lesser depth. The depth of the foundation shall
be so selected that it provides necessary stability with respect to overturning
and sliding.
The span configurations of foot over bridges on platforms shall be finalized considering economics,
construction feasibility, standard spans available from RDSO drawings. For clearances of FOB’s IRSOD will
be referred.
Design of foot over bridge shall be carried as per the IR manual and for RCC columns and ramps IRS
Concrete Bridge Code will be followed.
The dimension of the cover over platform shall be finalized considering the type of stations, length of the
platform and the standard drawings of RDSO for COP’s shall be referred. The clearances of COP’s will be
followed as per IRSOD.
This section briefly describes the activities involved and procedure that shall be adopted for the preparation
of General Arrangement Drawings (GADs) for Culverts, Minor, Major & Important Bridges, Road Over / Road
Under Bridges, Foot Over Bridges, etc. and preliminary design of these structures.
After arriving at the type and form of Bridge shall be recommended and finalization of the span
configuration and structural elements to be provided for a bridge crossing at each location. The
Collection of data from alignment design/report (Formation Level, Ground & Bed Levels, no. of
Correlate Hydrological data (Discharge, HFL, cross-section and bed slope of the drain, etc.).
Study of Geotechnical data and its interpretation.
Study of existing bridge data if any (when proposed alignment is passing close to existing
track/highway, etc.).
Span configuration, type of superstructure, substructure and foundation details for every individual bridge
shall be finalized, considering the inputs available as in the above paragraph, at each bridge/crossing
location.
General Arrangement drawings of Bridges will be prepared for all bridges and crossings.
While preparing and reviewing the GADs, a standard checklist shall be used for every bridge to maintain
uniformity in each bridge and avoid missing any details in the GADs.
Minor and major bridge of similar span configuration shall be clubbed in the single drawing and shall be
submitted accordingly. Exclusive drawing for the important bridge shall be submitted.
Detailed Bridge estimates will be prepared based on the finalized bridge details and analysis of rates.
Design criteria to be adopted for different bridges in the detail design stage for execution / EPC works will
be prepared.
Cost economics:
Comparison of the bridge with respect to options of bridge or embankment, where embankment
height is large.
Comparison of different Span arrangements, type and form of Superstructure and foundation, etc.
Bridge design and Alignment Design are interdependent. Inputs of recommended bridge data shall be
required at different stages of alignment finalization. Also, finalization of bridge configuration and
preparation of GADs shall be carried out after finalization of alignment design. Accordingly, the bridge
design work shall be carried out in stages, along with finalization of alignment to gradually evolve at the
economic design of bridge and alignment. Different stages of the workflow, along with various inputs that
will be considered for bridge design, activities performed in bridge design and outputs generated in each
General Arrangement Drawings for Bridges, Tunnels, ROBs, FOBs, COP’s, Staff Quarters, Station
Buildings and yards.
5.5.12.1 Bridges:
Quantities of Minor Bridges, RUB’s, Major Waterway Bridges, Important Bridges, ROBs, etc. will be
estimated as per the General Arrangement Drawings and relevant RDSO drawings. Reinforcement for
Substructure shall be estimated as per the reinforcement coefficients (Kg/Cum) provided by the structures
team.
5.5.12.2 Stations:
The cost of Stations shall be estimated based on the types of stations proposed and shall include Platforms
Station Building including general electrification, air-conditioning and ventilation, cover over Platform, foot
over bridges wherever required, IMD, IMSD, water supply and drainage arrangements and other facilities.
The cost of Staff quarter shall be estimated based on the types of quarter proposed and shall cover
electrification, ventilation, air condition, etc. the type of quarters are Type II, Type III and Type IV shall be
followed accordingly. The quantities will be calculated as per standard RDSO drawings.
Standard item of works and rates shall be considered from Indian Railway USSOR and the last accepted
rates from the Contract agreements (RVNL Projects etc. in the vicinity) to arrive at the cost of the Stations.
These rates shall be escalated to the year 2022 level as per the latest available Wholesale Price Index of All
Commodities.
Once the GAD has been prepared the same shall be submitted for further approval from the concern
Authority.
The following codes shall be referred to design the bridge Substructure and foundations.
stresses.
IRC-78:2014-Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges -Section VII –
Foundations and Substructure.
IRC-22:2008-Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges -Section VI –Composite
Construction.
IS 875 (P-1)-Code of practice for design loads (other than Earthquake) For Buildings and Structures
IS 875 (P-3)-2015 - Code of practice for design loads (other than Earthquake) For Buildings and
UIC-774-3R-Track/Bridge Interactions.
UIC - 772 - 2R - Code for the use of rubber bearings for rail bridges
IRC-112: 2020 Concrete Bridge Code
5.6. Tunnel
The alignment from km 157 to 225 has five tunnels, comprising a total length of 7350 m have been
proposed of which the longest single tunnel is 2700m long while the shortest tunnel is 350 m long. The
Construction Methods:
a. Cut and Cover Tunnelling - It is well-proven technique for constructing shallow tunnels. The method can
accommodate changes in tunnel width and non-uniform shapes and is often adopted in construction of
underground stations. Several overlapping works are required to be carried out in using this Cut and cover
tunnelling method.
b. Drill and Blast – This tunnelling method involves the use of explosives. Drilling rigs are used to drill blast
holes on the proposed tunnel surface to a designated depth for blasting. Explosives and timed detonators
are then placed in the blast holes. Once blasting is carried out, waste rocks and soils are transported out of
the tunnel before further blasting. Most tunnelling construction in rock involves ground that is somewhere
between two extreme conditions of hard rock and soft ground. Hence adequate structural support
c. Bored Tunnelling by Tunnel Boring Machines (TBM) – Bored tunnelling by using a Tunnel Boring
Machine (TBM) is often used for excavating long tunnels. An effective TBM method requires the selection of
appropriate equipment for different rock mass and geological conditions. The TBM may be suitable for
excavating tunnels which contain competent rocks that can provide adequate geological stability for boring
a long section tunnel without structural support. However, extremely hard rock can cause significant wear
of the TBM rock cutter and may slow down the progress of the tunnelling works to the point where TBM
becomes inefficient and uneconomical and may take longer time than the drill-and-blast tunnelling
method.
d. Sequential Excavation Method – At the 13th symposium of the International Society of Rock Mechanics
(ISRM) hosted in Salzburg, Austria in 1962, Rabcewics presented the basis of New Austrian Tunnelling
Method, known worldwide by its acronym NATM. The excavation location of a proposed tunnel is divided
into segments first. The segments are then mined sequentially with supports. Some mining equipment's
such as road-headers and backhoes are commonly used for the tunnel excavation. The ground for
excavation must be fully dry for applying the NATM and ground dewatering is also an essential process
before the excavation. Another process relates to the ground modifications such as grouting and ground
freezing is also common with this method in order to stabilize the soil for tunnelling.
The tunnels in this report are designed to be constructed according to the New Austrian Tunnelling Method
(NATM). It is based on the concept that the ground around the tunnel not only acts as a load, but also as a
load-bearing element. Typically, the excavation and support activities are continuously adjusted to suit the
ground conditions, always considering the technical/design requirements. The ground reaction, in the form
of lining displacements is measured in order to check the stability of the opening and to optimize
The typical support elements in NATM are sprayed concrete and rock bolts. Steel ribs or lattice girders
provide limited early support before the sprayed concrete hardens and ensure correct profile geometry. If
ground conditions require support at or ahead of the excavation face, face bolts sprayed concrete, spiles or
Advantages of NATM:
The excavation cross-section may be subdivided into top heading, side slashing, bench and invert
depending on both ground conditions and logistical requirements (i.e., to facilitate the use of standard plant
and machinery).
Limitations of NATM:
In order to use this technique, the ground has to be capable of supporting itself over the length of each
advance section, which means that the ground must have sufficient stand-up time. The limit of this
construction technique can overcome if it is possible to enhance the stand-up time of the ground by
The geometry of the tunnels mainly depends on the ground conditions and the usage of the tunnel. The
tunnel is typically advanced by drill and blast following a sequential excavation method (top heading with
multi stages and benching depending upon the geological conditions and logistic requirements)
The bench is excavated simultaneously to the top heading, up to a few hundred meters behind the
excavation face, providing a ramp for access to the heading. The excavation sequence for the proposed
Figure 5: Schematic construction sequence of a typical NATM tunnel in Hard rock [x]
Excavated
Area =
58.45 m2
Single Tube, Single
A
Track
Two Sub-parallel
Adits
Excavated
Area =
69.24 m2
Single Tube, Single
B Track, Motorable
Way
Two Sub-parallel
Adits
Excavated
Area (MT)
= 58.45 m2
Excavated
Area (ET) =
18.5 m2
Single
Tube,
C
Single
Track,
Separate
Escape
Tunnel
Cross-
Passages
One Adit
Excavated
Area (MT)
= 116.90 m2
Double
D Tube,
Single
Track
Cross-
Passages
One Adit
Excavated
E Area (MT)
= 97.50 m2
Single
Tube,
Double
Track
Two Sub-
parallel
Adits
A mixed approach giving a very high weightage to safety aspects but also considering construction, cost and
future expansion has been adopted for the selection of the geometric configuration of tunnel # 2 and 5, being
similar in length. The ideal tool for this kind of analysis is the Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) method, described in
the following paragraph.
Five possible options have been compared. Option A: Single tube-Single track tunnel including pedestrian
escape way with two sub-parallel adits; Option B: Single tube-Single track tunnel including motorable escape
way with two sub-parallel adits; Option C: Single tube-Single track tunnel including pedestrian escape way with
safety parallel escape tunnel with one intermediate adit and seven cross-passages connecting the main tunnel
and escape tunnel; Option D: Double tube-Single track tunnels including pedestrian escape way with
intermediate adit and seven cross-passages connecting the two tunnels and Option E: Single-tube Double track
tunnel with two sub-parallel adits. The five proposed options are given below [*]
Table
Safety 25.0%
Cost 25.0%
Safety 16.7%
Cost 16.7%
Safety 50.0%
Cost 16.7%
Safety 16.7%
Cost 50.0%
Safety 16.7%
Cost 16.7%
1. With equal weightage assigned for construction time, safety, cost and future expansion, maximum score
is for option B whereas minimum score is for option A.
2. While giving importance for construction time, the maximum score is for option B and minimum score is
for option D.
3. While giving importance for safety, the maximum score is for option D and minimum score is for option
A.
4. While giving importance for cost, the maximum score is for option A and minimum score is for option D.
5. While giving importance for future expansion, the maximum score is for option D and minimum score is
for option A.
6. The overall maximum score is for option D and minimum score is for option A
1. The acquired land width is 20 m only. Accommodating twin tunnels within 20 m with stress overlapping
is not advisable.
2. Most of the adjacent land of tunnel # 2 and 5 belongs to the Forest department and hence acquiring
additional land to accommodate the twin tunnels is a time-consuming process and hence not feasible.
Considering the above points, option C and D are ruled out, even though they have fourth and first ranks
respectively in MCA.
The remaining options are E, B and A with second, third and fifth ranks respectively in MCA. The final selection of
an option depends on the requirements of RVNL and will be done after the discussions with them prior to
preliminary design stage for tunnels. In order to achieve consistency, the same cross section selected for Tunnel
# 2 and 5 can be adopted for Tunnel # 1,3 and 4.
The tunnel drainage for keeping off and removing of water has been envisaged in the following categories:
· Permanent drainage (Tunnel seepage through lining, weep holes, from open
The geological investigations form the basis for developing a geological model. MNEC Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
has carried out the Geo-technical investigations based on the investigation plan, specifications, and data
requirements of RVNL. The fieldwork has been executed under the guidelines and direct supervision of
senior technical personnel and Engineers of RVNL. The following sub surface data methods are primarily
Following are the tests conducted on the Core Samples obtained from the boreholes.
· Density
· Specific Gravity
· Water Absorption
· Uniaxial Compressive strength
· Tensile Strength (Brazilian Test)
· Hardness
· Abrasiveness
· Youngs Modulus
· Modulus of Deformability
· Petrographic
All investigated data (geological, hydrogeological, geotechnical) will be processed and summarized which
forms the basis for the further tunnel design.
One of the essential principles of the new Austrian tunnelling method (NATM) geotechnical design
procedure (rock mass classification) is to identify hazards, which might arise during excavation of an
underground structure, then devise methods to mitigate those hazards, and arrive at a safe and economical
construction. To be able to identify the potential hazards (or modes of failure), a geological model must be
established, including distinguishing rock types as well as structural characteristics and singularities (joint
setup, faults, etc.), and the determination of factors influencing the behaviour (stresses, water, size and
shape of underground opening, etc.). In a next step, analyses for an unsupported tunnel are done to identify
the potential hazards. Depending on the type of potential failure mode of the unsupported tunnel a
construction concept is devised with the aim of optimally applying construction measures to mitigate the
expected hazards. This allows addressing local and project or site-specific problems and requirements.
The flow chart in Figure [*] shows the basic procedure to develop the geotechnical design, beginning with
the determination of the ground types and ending with the definition of excavation classes and support
categories respectively.
The first step starts with the establishment of the geologic model and proceeds by defining geotechnically
relevant parameters for each Ground Type. The key parameters values and distributions are determined
from available information and/or estimated with engineering and geological judgment. Ground with
similar properties is classified into Ground Types (GT). The number of Ground Types elaborated depends
on the project specific geological conditions.
The second step involves evaluating the potential ground behaviours considering each Ground Type and
local influencing factors, including the relative orientation of relevant discontinuities to the excavation,
ground water conditions, stress situation, etc. For each section, which has similar ground properties and
influencing factors, the Behaviour Type is determined.
The ground behaviour has to be evaluated for the full cross-sectional area without considering any
modifications including the excavation method or sequence and support or other auxiliary measures.
The evaluated project specific ground behaviours shall be assigned to basic Ground Behaviour Types
(Table). Project specific conditions may require a further subdivision of the Ground Behaviour Types as well
as a detailed description of the single expected behaviours.
Basically, this step shall identify potential hazards, like type of possible failure mode, magnitude and
characteristics of displacements, amount of water inflows and its effects on ground stability. The
knowledge of the potential hazards is an important basis for the selection of the construction concept.
1 Stable Stable ground with the potential of small local gravity induced
3 Shallow failure Shallow stress induced failure incombination with discontinuity and
gravity-controlled failure
4 Voluminous stress Stress induced failure involving large ground volumes and large
5 Rock burst Sudden and violent failure of the rock mass, caused by highly stressed
7 Crown failure Voluminous over-breaks in the crown with progressive shear failure
9 Flowing ground Flow of intensely fractured, poorly interlocked rocks or soil with high
water content
10 Swelling ground Time dependent volume increase of the ground caused by physical-
deformation melanges)
Characteristics
A feasible construction concept is chosen based on the ground characteristics and the determined ground
behaviour for each characteristic situation, consisting of excavation method, sequence of excavation
(subdivision of excavation phases), support and auxiliary methods. The target of the selected construction
concept is to mitigate the hazards identified in step 2 in an efficient and economical way.
Under consideration of the construction concept, including sequence of construction, stability of the face
and perimeter, and the spatial stress distribution, the ground behaviour in the excavation area is assessed.
Step 5 – Detailed determination of the excavation and support method and evaluation of ground
behaviour in the supported area
The excavation and support measures are fixed in quality and quantity, considering probable further
excavation steps, and the system behaviour is determined. The support measures include bolts (frictional
bolts, grouted bolts and self-drilling bolts), shotcrete with one or two layers of wire mesh and lattice girder if
required as circumferential excavation support system. Forepoling with grouted steel bars or with pipe
umbrella as support ahead of the tunnel excavation face as well as face support (shotcrete and/or grouted
or self-drilling face-anchors) will be designed if required according to the predicted ground and behaviour
types.
The ground behaviour is assessed with convergence-confinement analyses based on the ground reaction
curve model. The evaluated ground behaviour is then compared to the requirements. The support
measures will be designed in such way that the assessed ground behaviour is in compliance with the
requirements.
Based on steps 1 through 5 the alignment is divided into sections with similar excavation and support
requirements. The baseline construction plan (e.g., geotechnical longitudinal section) indicates the
excavation and support methods recommended for each section and contains limits and criteria for
In the final step of the design process excavation classes are defined, based on the evaluation of the
The geological investigation is addressed to test the soil and rock samples at above and below the
formation level and as wherever required and to collect the information from the boreholes in proposed
tunnel alignment at site along with physical, mechanical and chemical laboratory test results.
5.6.5.Design methodology
Empirical method based on Q-SystemThe development of empirical support design methods for the
stability of underground project aim to include the experience gained from similar projects, in similar
circumstances, in its construction. The main characteristic of these methods is the breakdown of a wider
range of rock mass quality by matching each of these categories with various support measures. The
empirical methods recommend the utilization of bolt, steel ribs or lattice girder and sprayed concrete as
primary support elements. Moreover, in those support measures, the stages of excavation, as well as
stresses developed, are also taken into account. Empirical method for primary support for the Tunnels
The initial lining is the instant support of the ground after excavation. It has a thickness ranging from 50 mm
to 300 mm depending on the ground conditions and size of the tunnel opening.
b) Rock bolts,
c) Steel ribs,
d) Tie rods,
e) Lagging, and
Appropriate combination of these supports shall be arrived by referring standard geotechnical charts.
The Q-system proposed by Barton et al. (1974) [*], was developed specifically for the design of tunnel
a. RQD
e. Water inflow
f. Stress condition
IS: 13365: Part 2: 2019 [*] can be referred for the classification of rock masses, support pressure, support
Barton et al. defined a parameter called Equivalent Dimension, De, of the excavation. This dimension is
obtained by dividing the span, diameter, or wall height of the excavation by a quantity called the
Excavation Support Ratio, ESR. Steps adopted for arriving the required preliminary supports are as follows:
Step-1: Value of ESR can be obtained from IS: 13365: Part 2: 2019 [*]
The ESR value for railway tunnel from the referred code is taken as 1.30
Step-3: From the chart given above [*], find the supports category required based on the Q values and
equivalent dimension.
The other empirical method that can be used is based on Rock Mass Rating (RMR). Graph for estimating
To apply the stress-strain analysis in tunnel design, a numerical model is prepared including the ground
surrounding the tunnel of the region to be analysed. In such models, all types of ground can be included
with or without ground water with the desired excavation shapes and considering any kind of rock
reinforcement or support. After applying the initial boundary conditions, these models are divided into
Numerical analysis will be performed on RS2, a finite element program for soil and rock applications,
developed by rocscience Inc. It is used for 2-dimensional analysis and design of underground excavations
and other geotechnical area. It can be used with Mohr-Coulomb and Generalized Hoek-Brown failure
· The geometry of the tunnel is the same along the tunnel length, permitting the three-dimensional
· The rock mass surrounding the tunnel is homogenous, isotropic in all directions.
· In FEM analysis rock mass is subjected to Hoek-Brown yield criterion and all the input shear
· Parameters and soil behaviour: The geologic layers will be modelled with Mohr- Coulomb strength
criterion.
· Boundary conditions: The upper boundary is kept free to simulate the tunnel under gravity loading.
The geometrical dimensions of the model will be chosen in order to minimize the boundary
conditions influence on the analyses results in the proximities of the excavated sections.
The final permanent lining for tunnel consists of cast-in-place concrete. Cast-in-place concrete can be un-
reinforced or reinforced. Requirement of reinforcement in inner lining shall be at few critical locations i.e., at
The software used for the numerical analysis would be the two-dimensional finite element software RS2
from Rocscience. This software is intended for 2D elasto-plastic finite element stress analysis for
underground excavations in rock or soil. Usually, the tunnel excavation process is simulated step by step
with FEM modelling. In these analyses, 2D finite element models with the capability of simulating the
5.6.6.The maximum axial forces and bending moments calculated from the numerical analyses and
the resulting values including safety factors would be checked with structural capacity curve (M-N
interaction curve) of Reinforced concrete for final/secondary lining support.Tunnel Portal
Open excavation would be done at portal faces to get the necessary rock cover before beginning tunneling.
The geological map of the tunnel portal areas and the details of the joint sets are yet to be prepared or
made available. In this regard, additional field and laboratory tests will be proposed in a separate report.
The function of the portal frame is essentially to form a face to the tunnel which initially may lie in a reach
of shallow rock or soil cover. A superimposed load of 2.0 m height of soil-rock debris over portal beam has
to be considered to account for impact load due to sliding of rock mass if any. The stress condition at the
state of impending collapse of the structure can be analysed by Staad Pro software package developed by
Bentley Systems, Inc [*]. Appropriate partial load factors are to be considered to suit the practical conditions
that may exist at the site. The section of structural elements would be designed on the basis of the most
critical limit state of collapse. Flexural reinforcements would be provided practically considering the
envelope of Bending Moments. Shear reinforcements would also be provided as per the provisions
stipulated in the relevant Indian standards. Control of crack-width and protection of reinforcement is
ensured by adequate cover. The area of the footings is to be fixed on the basis of the allowable bearing
pressure and the applied loads and moments under service load conditions. At the same time, if hard rock
is encountered at the proposed portal locations, the portal beam can be avoided.
The stability of rock slopes is essentially governed by the orientation of joint sets, joint characteristics,
seepage pressure, depth and steepness of the excavated slope face and its orientation with respect to the
joint sets.
a. Circular slip
b. Planar sliding
c. Wedge sliding
d. Topping
The design principle is based on these four failure modes and each of these has to be investigated in detail.
For each failure mode an appropriate support system has been determined and the most suitable support
I. Analysis Methods
Analyses of the cut slopes have been described in two categories as limit equilibrium method and
numerical analysis. Limit equilibrium method assumes an infinite failure plane based on Mohr- Coulomb
failure Criteria. The stability of the cut slope is determined by considering the Factor of Safety (FOS) of the
final cut slope. For this case, the FOS is defined as the ratio of the resisting forces to disturbing forces.
Following analyses methods are used to check the stability of cut slope in rock
The software Dips developed by Rocscience Inc. Canada [*] is used to prepare pi diagram to predict
Sliding on a joint/weak plane dipping into excavation, often termed as a planar failure. The resisting and
disturbing forces are resolved using limiting equilibrium and modelling a plane wedge with vertical lateral
release planes. As per IS 14448: 1997 (Reaffirmed 2022) [*], the allowable factor of safety of a Plane wedge
analysis under static condition is 1.2 and under seismic condition the factor of safety is 1.0. Accordingly,
analysis has to be carried out in RocPlane software developed by Rocscience Inc. Canada [*] to check the
adequate factor of safety of cut slope. The optimization of rock anchors, under various conditions has to be
calculated. For planner failure Mohr-Coulomb criteria or Barton-Bandis criteria has to be adopted
depending upon the availability of joint details. Sensitivity Analysis can also be carried out to determine the
The software Swedge developed by Rocscience Inc. Canada [*] is proposed to be used to analyze the
stability of surface wedges in rock slopes, defined by two intersecting planes, the slope surface and an
optional tension crack. In all cases, the assumed failure mode of wedge is translational slip. The stability of
each batter was evaluated to obtain the safety factor of wedges formed on slopes for both the condition
static as well as seismic condition. Swedge computes the factor of safety for translational slip of a
c. Discontinuities
e. A tension cracks
In case of instability of slope against wedge failure the optimized rock anchor provision is also to be
checked.
The global stability analysis is to be carried out for critical section using slope stability software SLOPE/W,
distributed by GEO-SLOPE International Limited. This uses the limit equilibrium method to determine the
factor of safety on circular failure surfaces. Limit equilibrium method assumes an infinite failure plane based
on the Mohr- Coulomb criterion. The results of the analysis are expressed as a factor of safety, which is
defined as the ratio of available shear strength to that required for equilibrium. Inherent in limit equilibrium
stability analysis is the requirement to analyze many trial slip surfaces and find the slip surface that gives
Usually, four different methods are used to calculate the factor of safety for both static as well as for seismic
condition. These methods are: 1) Ordinary Bishop, 2) Simplified Bishop, 3) Janbu and 4) Morgenstern &
Price. The difference in these methods lies in assumptions only. In the below table a comparison of different
methods is shown.
Table:
Bishop 2. Each slip surface is subdivided the base of each slice is zero.
Simplified 1. Slip surface is circular. 1. ∑ Moment of all the forces about the
considered.
Janbu 1. Slip surface is circular. 1. ∑ Moment of all the forces about the
3. Only inter-slice normal forces are the base of each slice is zero.
Morgenste 1. Slip surface is circular. 1. ∑ Moment of all the forces about the
3. Inter slice shear forces (X) are the base of each slice is zero.
(E) by a half sine function as, X = l the base of each slice is zero.
f (X)
Based on the scale effects and geological conditions, it can be understood that the sliding surfaces can
form either along discontinuity surfaces or through the rock mass. On a bench scale, structurally controlled
failures such as plane shear and wedge failures are common. Infinite slope failure is assumed to take place
along a simple circular arc, and this is used to approximate step-path planar failures heavily fractured
slopes with no long persistence of discontinuities. Hence in all slopes for stability analysis it is necessary to
use the shear strength properties of either the discontinuities or of the rock mass.
a. Planar Failure
A plane failure is a comparatively rare sight in rock slopes because it is only occasionally that all the
geometric conditions required to produce such a failure occur in an actual slope. However, it would not be
right to ignore the two-dimensional case because there are many valuable lessons to be learned from a
consideration of the mechanics of this simple failure mode. Plane failure is particularly useful for
demonstrating the sensitivity of the slope to changes in shear strength and ground water conditions-
changes that are less obvious when dealing with the more complex mechanics of a three-dimensional
slope failure. Figure [*] show a typical plane failure in a rock slope where a block of rock has slid on a
ingle=plane dipping out of the face. In order for this type of failure to occur, the following geometrical
a.The plane on which sliding occurs must strike parallel or nearly parallel (within approximately ±20) to the
slope face.
b.The sliding plane must “daylight” in the slope face, which means that the dip of the plane must be less
c. The dip of the sliding plane must be greater than the angle of friction of this plane, that is, ψp > φ.
d. The upper end of the sliding surface either intersects the upper slope, or terminates in a tension crack.
e. Release surfaces that provide negligible resistance to sliding must be present in the rock mass to define
the lateral boundaries of the slide. Alternatively, failure can occur on a sliding plane passing through the
b. Wedge Failure
This failure occurs when slopes containing discontinuities striking obliquely to the slope face and sliding of
a wedge of rock takes place along the line of intersection of two such planes. Wedge failures can occur
over a much wider range of geologic and geometric conditions than plane failures, so the study of wedge
stability is an important component. The geometry of the wedge for analyzing the basic mechanics of
sliding is defined in Figure [*]. Based on this geometry, the general conditions for wedge failure are as
follows:
a.Two planes will always intersect in a line. On the stereonet, the line of intersection is represented by the
point where the two great circles of the planes intersect, and the orientation of the line is defined by its
b. The plunge of the line of intersection must be flatter than the dip of the face, and steeper than the
average friction angle of the two slide planes, that is ψfi > ψi > φ. The inclination of the slope face ψfi is
measured in the view at right angles to the line of intersection. Note the ψfi would only be the same as ψf,
the true dip of the slope face, if the dip direction of the line of intersection were the same as the dip
c. The line of intersection must dip in a direction out of the face for sliding to be feasible; the possible range
c. Circular Failure
In plane or wedge failure, the failure of rock slopes is controlled by geological features such as bedding
planes and joints that divide the rock into a discontinuous mass. Under these conditions, one or more of the
discontinuities normally defines the slide surface. However, in the case of a closely fractured or highly
weathered rock, a strongly defined structural pattern no longer exists, and the slide surface is free to find
Observations of slope failures in these materials suggest that this slide surface generally takes the form of a
circle, and most stability theories are based upon this observation. Figure [*] shows a typical circular failure
in a highly weathered rock slope. The conditions under which circular failure will occur arise when the
individual particles in a soil or rock mass are very small compared with the size of the slope. Hence, broken
rock in a fill will tend to behave as a “soil” and fail in a circular mode when the slope dimensions are
Similarly, soil consisting of sand, silt and smaller particle sizes will exhibit circular slide surfaces, even in
slopes only a few meters in height. Highly altered and weathered rocks, as well as rock with closely spaced,
randomly oriented discontinuities will also tend to fail in this manner. It is appropriate to design slopes in
these materials on the assumption that a circular failure process will develop.
As per IS 15026 [*] Clause 4, a tunnel in a seismic area is likely to be affected near the portals and in
neighbourhood of faults and thrusts. The effect is observed to be up to a distance along tunnel within + Bg
on both sides of the faults/thrusts, where B is span/size of the opening. Horizontal and vertical seismic
5.6.8. Materials
5.6.8.1. Cement
Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) of 43 grade and/or 53 grade conforming to IS: 269: 2015
(Reaffirmed 2020) [*] 8112- 1989 and IS: 12269-1987 shall be used.
Portland Pozzolana Cement (PPC) conforming to IS:1489: Part 1: 2015 (Reaffirmed 2020) [*] and IS:
1489: Part 2 (Reaffirmed 2020) [*] may also be used.
The Employer’s representative may give notice for the usage of Sulphate-Resistant Portland
Cement conforming to IS:12330: 1988 (Reaffirmed 2019) [*] for concrete structural elements
exposed to soil.
5.6.8.3. Concrete
24 kN/m3 for reinforced concrete with 2% or less reinforcement (IS:875 Part 1: 1987
(Reaffirmed 2018) [*] (Value rationalized).
25 kN/m3 for reinforced concrete with above 2% reinforcement (IS:875 Part 1: 1987 (Reaffirmed
2018 ) [*] (Value rationalized).23 kN/m3 for plane concrete (IS:875 Part 1: 1987 (Reaffirmed 2018 ) [*] (Value
rationalized
Short-term Modulus of Elasticity Ec, shall be 5000* Sqrt(fck) and short-term Modular Ratio shall be Es/Ec
and long-term Modular Ratio shall be 280/3σcbc as per IS456: 2000 (Reaffirmed 2021) [*]
Minimum grade of concrete shall be M30 for Tunnel inner lining and M20 for Tunnel portal beams
according to IS456: 2000 (Reaffirmed 2021) [*]
The coefficient of thermal expansion shall be 0.90 x 10-5/o C (Value rationalized) according to IS456: 2000
(Reaffirmed 2021) [*] assuming available Basaltic aggregate at the site will be used
Poisson’s Ratio 0.20 shall be considered in the design for all concretes [*]
Minimum cement content and maximum water -cement ratio shall be as per IS:456: 2000 (Reaffirmed
2021) [*].
Nominal concrete cover shall be as per IS:456: 2000 (Reaffirmed 2021) [*].
5.6.8.4. Reinforcement
Reinforcement bars conforming to IS:1786: 2008 (Reaffirmed 2018) [*] shall be adopted.
Lattice girders shall be fabricated with reinforcing steel bars of minimum yield strength of 500 N/mm2 conforming
to IS: 1786: 2008 (Reaffirmed 2018 ) [*].
5.6.8.7. Forepoling
For forepoling, steel bars of minimum diameter 25 mm conforming to IS: 1786: 2008 (Reaffirmed 2018 ) [*]
shall be used. The characteristic yield strength of steel shall not be less than 500 N/mm 2.
5.7. Buildings
"Power line crossing" means an electrical overhead line or under-ground cable placed across railway
track(s) for the transmission and/or distribution of electrical energy. It may also be referred to as a
"Crossing" in these Regulations. Number of electrical power lines of transmission, distribution authorities
and other agencies are passing in section. In many locations electrical power lines are crossing the
proposed line section and these lines either to be removed or shifted to avoid electrical infringements or
electrical interference and electrical safety for existing power lines and proposed lines. Details of power line
crossing with voltage level mentioned in Annexure – A
1 LT Line 109
2 11 kV Line 42
3 33 kV Line 10
4 66 kV Line 4
5 132 kV Line 6
6 220 kV Line 5
7 400 kV Line 4
Preparation of Report in Tabular Format for All EHT, HT, LT Power Line
Crossings
Voltage Levels:
As per the site visit, we have identified the voltage levels for all the power line crossing.
SR DESCRIPTION OF VERTICAL
CHAINAGE (M)
NO. CROSSING CLEARANCE (M)
SR DESCRIPTION OF VERTICAL
CHAINAGE (M)
NO. CROSSING CLEARANCE (M)
SR DESCRIPTION OF VERTICAL
CHAINAGE (M)
NO. CROSSING CLEARANCE (M)
SR DESCRIPTION OF VERTICAL
CHAINAGE (M)
NO. CROSSING CLEARANCE (M)
SR DESCRIPTION OF VERTICAL
CHAINAGE (M)
NO. CROSSING CLEARANCE (M)
An overhead line crossing over railway tracks already electrified shall be located at the middle of
overhead equipment span supported by two adjacent traction masts/structures. The distance
between any of the crossing conductors and the nearest traction mast or structure under the most
adverse conditions shall not be less than 6m.
Note: If, in unavoidable circumstances, the crossing span cannot be so located, the minimum
clearance between any of the crossing conductors of the crossing and the nearest traction mast or
structure shall be not less than that specified for buildings in Rule 80 of the Indian Electricity Rules,
1956 (as amended upto November 1984).
No overhead line crossing shall be located over a booster transformer, traction switching station,
traction sub-station or a track cabin location in an electrified area.
The minimum height above rail level of the lowest portion of any conductor of a crossing, including
guard wire, under conditions of maximum sag shall be as follows: -
Type of Structure:
We have to check the condition of the existing H type structure for power line crossing. If the
existing structure is in good condition, then we have to use the same structure for cable termination
& if the condition of the structure is not good then we can propose the new H type structure for the
cable termination.
Steel poles/masts fabricated steel structures or reinforced or pre-stressed concrete poles either of
the self-supporting type or guyed type conforming in all respects to the Indian electricity Rules, 1956
(as amended, upto November 1984) and complying with the latest editions of Codes of Practice,
IS:800-1962 for "Code of Practice for use of structural steel in general building construction, IS:875-
1964 for "Code of Practice for structural safety of buildings; loading standards" and IS:456-1978 for
"Code of Practice for plain and reinforced concrete" shall be used on either side of the track to
support the crossing span. These structures shall be of the terminal type. For arriving at the
crippling load, the wind loads as detailed in the latest edition of 1S.802 (Part-I)-1977 for "Loads and
permissible stresses" shall be adopted. The steel structures shall normally be galvanised in
accordance with IS:2629-1966 for "Recommended practice for hot-dip galvanising of iron and
steel."
The minimum distance of the structures (supporting the crossing span) from the center of the
nearest railway track shall be equal to the height of the structure in metres above normal ground
level plus 6 metres. In special circumstances, the Electrical Inspector may permit a lesser distance
being adopted subject to any conditions he deems fit to impose.
The crossing span shall be restricted to 300 m or to 80% of the normal span for which the
structures are designed, whichever is less.
Where the ends of a cable of an underground crossing are terminated on structures for connection
to an overhead line, such structures shall comply with the Regulations in so far as they are
applicable to overhead line crossings in respect of structures.
Earthing:
Each structure on either side of the crossing span supporting the transmission/distribution line
conductors shall be earthed effectively by two separate and distinct earths and connections. At
least one separate earth electrode shall be provided for each earth connection.
All guard and stay wires shall be properly clamped to the structures connected to earth so as to
maintain proper electrical continuity to earth.
Where struts are provided, they shall also be effectively connected to earth separately as well as to
the main structure earths.
Where the earth resistance of the independent tower/structure is higher than 10 ohms, the owner
shall take necessary steps to improve the earth resistance either by providing multiple earth
electrodes or by suitably treating the soil surrounding the earth electrode or by resorting to
counterpoise earthing. The method of earthing the transmission/distribution line structures etc. for
the crossing span shall be approved by the Railway.
The earths shall be inspected and tested annually on a hot dry day and results thereof furnished to
the Railway for verification and record. If the earth resistance is found to be high, i.e., above 10
ohms, steps shall be taken to reduce it and an advice given to the Railway.
The cross-section of the earth conductor/connections for the earthing system shall be adequate for
the application. They shall not be damaged or overheated or melt while carrying the short circuit
current.
Power supply and distribution arrangement, scale of fittings, electrical wiring scheme of Operation
Control Center, Traction Power Control Center, crew booking lobbies, running rooms, station
Buildings, service Buildings, staff Quarters, tower car sheds, locomotive service canters, signalling
cabins etc. Air conditioning of OCC Centers, signal cabins and all vital installations, shall be
prepared based on GAD and floor plans of these buildings. The necessary scale of fitting and
relevant NBC codes will be adhered to while preparing the same. Considering energy efficiency by
use of BEE star rating equipment, LED lighting, GRIHA, TERI guidelines and IGBC guidelines. The
power requirements of all service buildings, stations and commercial buildings will be assessed
taking into consideration reliability of supply and the SEB/DISCOM tariffs so as to arrive at overall
economic project cost.
According to the function and operation requirements of the corridor stations and depot, the
electrical and mechanical installation shall at least include the following subsystem
Electrical system
LT panels
Distribution boards
MV cabling and bus ducts
Conduit wiring
Indoor lighting and fans
External lighting
Protective earthing
Lightning protection
UPS system
DG set
Solar system
Fire system
Fire alarm and annunciation system
Fire hydrant system
Sprinkler system
Portable fire extinguishers
Panel flooding system
Air conditioning and ventilation system
Incoming Supply is received at Main Distribution Board (MDB) through transformers at the Auxiliary
Sub Station (ASS) located at the station building. This power supply is further distributed from MDB
to all distribution panels including Sub Main Distribution Boards (SMDB) / Distribution Boards
(DB) / Power Distribution Boards (PDB) etc. The power distribution system provides power to the
various electrical loads i.e., Signalling, Telecommunication, Fire pumps, Air conditioning and
ventilation, Elevator, Escalator, Water pumps, small power system, lighting system, commercial
(property development), etc. Figure shows the 33kV/11kV HT panel, Transformer and Main
Distribution Board arrangement in the Auxiliary substation
b) Transformer
All medium voltage switchboards shall be suitable for operation at three-phase/three phases 4
wire, 415-volt, 50 Hz, a neutral grounded system with a symmetrical short circuit level. All
panels/boards shall be front operated, dust, vermin proof, extensible, top/bottom cable entry,
compartmentalized with lockable hinged doors. The maximum overall height of panels and the
maximum/minimum height of the operating handles from floor level shall be as per standard
norms. Ventilating louvers where required shall be provided on the sides of the panels and shall be
of the approved design to suit local conditions.
Lighting system shall be installed throughout all stations areas, tunnel area, parking areas, auto/taxi
bus drop off points and relocated / new access roads. The lighting shall be designed to achieve a
bright look, avoid any dark patches, and afford easy and safe access to all other areas. The lighting
shall be enough to avoid an unsafe situation under any normal or abnormal conditions. All station
premises shall have adequate lighting, including footbridges and under passages, stairways, steps,
ramps, escalators, equipment room, etc during operation and maintenance time. The illumination
level in stations shall satisfy comfort level and safety to the commuters. The height of lighting
fixtures shall be adequate to provide effective illumination and thus enable passengers and staff to
have a good visual view. The number of luminaires shall be calculated based on the lux level
calculation (using Dialux or any other lighting software) to achieve the required illumination level
and uniformity. Various types of luminaires will be used depending upon usage, the height of the
area and hazards present in the room.
Following points shall be considered for the selection/design of indoor /outdoor light fittings:
All lighting fixtures shall be LED type to reduce the energy consumption.
All fixtures shall be complete with accessories and fixings necessary for installation.
Fixture housing, frame or canopy shall provide a suitable cover for the fixture outlet box or
fixture opening.
Fixtures and/or fixture outlet boxes shall be provided with hangers to adequately support the
complete weight of the fixture tightly secured to a fixture stud in the outlet box.
Lighting for stairs and escalators shall be designed to emphasize illumination on the top and
bottom steps and landings.
Tunnel lights shall be of IP65 weatherproof type with housing material compliance SFSRTS,
Industrial Type and NFPA 130.
Tunnel lights shall be provided at 6.8 to 9 mtr interval with a minimum illumination level as
stipulated in the Standard for Fire Safety in Rapid Transit Systems (SFSRTS).
The alternate Tunnel Luminaries shall be fed from Emergency power source to ensure
availability of the lighting in the event of failure of Raw Power source.
Emergency lighting is provided to ensure that during failure of a building's main lighting
system there remains a level of artificial illumination which will allow safe and unambiguous
egress from the stations and tunnels.
The power socket outlets for maintenance purpose in Tunnels shall be supplied at 16A, 240V,
1-phase 50 Hz. The socket outlets shall be rated to IP65 for Tunnels, external use or in wet
environment locations.
All FOBs & Platform shall be provided with IP65 weatherproof light fixtures.
Lighting system requirements associated with electrical systems and equipment shall comply with
the relevant latest version of the requirements of IS-3646(all 3 parts), IS-1913, IS-1777, IS-374, IS-
10322(ALL parts), BS-5266, BS-5489, BS-8206, BS/EN 60598, IEC-60598, IEC -62031, LM -79, NFPA -
130, NFPA -101.
Tunnel Emin.
2.7Lux
Emergency lighting system shall be installed to ensure that all the escape routes, including tunnels,
trainway, walkway, from the various areas, shall be safely and effectively identified in an
emergency. Emergency lighting shall be supplied from UPS, designed to meet the requirements of
illumination.
Emergency lighting shall be in accordance with the firefighting Code and building code (NFPA
130, NFPA 101, NFPA 70, NBC latest etc).
Emergency lights shall be installed in all areas of the station. The emergency illumination shall
provide the following features.
At least 25% of the illumination provided by emergency light fixtures.
Emergency light fixtures at critical locations along the exit direction inside the station should be
used as escape lights. They should be equipped with batteries.
Un-interrupted power supply system (UPS) is required to ensure that there is no total darkness at
the station under any circumstances. Following points shall be considered for the selection of UPS.
The UPS shall be a true parallel redundant, online input 3-phase 415 V & output 1-ph 230 V
complete with all modules like converter, inverter, bypass modules with battery backup with
charging arrangement and other standard accessories.
UPS shall be provided with suitable communication interface for remote monitoring from
Operation Control Centre.
Emergency lighting
Emergency signage
Public Announcement (PA)system
Fire command centre
Gas flooding system in electric panels
Protective signalling system
A DG set of suitable capacity shall provide the back-up power to emergency & essential categories
of loads. The starting of DG set shall be controlled through an automatic mains failure panel (AMF).
The supply from the DG set shall be received at LV switchboard provided in ASS and the DG set
supply shall be extended to essential Power Panel (EPP). The generator set shall be able to start
automatically even in cold conditions and shall take full rated load within predefined time of failure
of the normal supply through an automatic changeover switch. Figure shows the arrangement of a
DG set in the DG room of stations.
DG room
All DG sets in accordance with the requirements of BS-5514, BS-649, IS-4722, IS-8183, BS-4552, BS-
7226, IS-3043, ISO -8528, NFPA -130, Latest CPCB norms for noise level, Height of stack/chimney
and emission levels as per the latest standards.
24-hour air conditioning shall be provided to critical equipment rooms such as signalling, and
telecommunications. The air conditioning system shall be designed in such a way to maintain the
required temperature and humidity in the equipment and operational room. The following rooms of
the stations and Depot will be generally airconditioned.
Station
To achieve the above stated inside conditions, it is proposed to use the Variable refrigerant volume
(VRV)/Variable refrigerant flow (VRF) air conditioning system and five star rated split type AC system
into Stations and Depot.
Heat load calculation shall be prepared to select the appropriate refrigeration capacity of air
conditioners for various rooms. The air-conditioning system shall be in accordance with the
requirements of ASHRAE /ISHRAE standard.
The Variable Refrigerant Volume VRV / Variable Refrigerant Flow VRF- R-410A refrigerant system
should be air-cooled, air conditioning systems shall be consisting of modular condensing units
connected to multiple indoor units, each having the capability of individual setpoint control. Figure
10-47 shows the VRF arrangement in Station and Depot.
The indoor units shall be provided with corded remote control as a standard accessory. The VRV /
VRF units shall be capable of operating within a wide range of ambient temperatures.
The split Air conditioner system with a 5-star rating shall be provided if required.
Panel mounted air conditioner may be provided to cool only the panel and not the entire room,
wherever possible.
The Building Management System consolidates the monitoring and control functions of all auxiliary
subsystems in common operation terminal, providing a user platform that can be operated through
an integrated human–machine interface (HMI). The building management system consolidates all
information and control of the electromechanical equipment of Station, Depot and Tunnel. All
electrical equipment will be provided with monitoring facilities for interconnection to the BMS
system. The main components shall be
The BMS system must handle all the monitoring and control of electromechanical equipment in
each Station, Depot and Tunnel.
The BMS shall be integrated with Fire Alarm System (FAS) at stations, for detection and notification
of fire conditions in the station area.
The BMS system at the Operation Control Centre (OCC) provides overall monitoring of all the
stations along the corridor.
The BMS shall perform the control, monitoring and supervision of Tunnel ventilation systems, Air
Conditioning System, Low Voltage Power & Distribution System, Fire Alarm System, Hydraulic System
(Seepage, Sewage, Bore Well Pumps etc.), and other nominated Building Services (escalators, elevators).
The BMS shall help in energy conservation, planning and executing various energy conservation
control schemes.
The architecture of a typical BMS system is provided in Figure below
The fire detection and suppression system shall consist of fire control panels, fire detectors, and
suppression monitoring devices.
Fire alarms, fire alarm control panel and associated fire detector device status, fire suppression
system equipment status, and suppression system alarms shall be enunciated at central control.
NFPA 130 shall be used as the guiding standard for the fire detection and alarm system. The
system shall be designed in an integrated manner in accordance with NFPA-72D, BS-5839, BS/EN-
54, ISO-7240, as appropriate or other Internationally recognized or local code. The requirements of
the Fire Service Department shall be incorporated into the system.
Fire Detection System: The fire detection system for each station, depot building, and other
structure shall include but not limited to.
The fire alarm panel shall be provided at the station controller room and the repeater panel can be
placed at the security control room. Figure shows the fire alarm panel.
The optical detector shall work on a light scattering principle and capable of responding to any
heavy smoke particles. The detector shall have LED at the base to indicate visually in case of a fire.
Figure shows the smoke detector arrangement.
Smoke detector
Heat detector shall be thermistor type, working on rate of rising and fixed temperature principle. The
detector shall be suitably protected against dust accumulation/ingress and it shall be free from
maintenance and functional test at intervals. Figure shows the heat detector arrangement.
Heat detector
Manual call points shall consist of a push-button switch housed in a dust-tight sheet steel enclosure
to manually initiate audio-visual alarms. The front shall be sealed with a breakable glass cover fixed
in such a way that the actuating push button is kept depressed if the glass is intact and released
automatically when the glass is broken. Figure shows the manual call box arrangement.
Hooter cum speaker will be provided in operational area, Service areas and exit areas in public
spaces near Hose Reel Stations. Dual Tone hooter shall be of an electronic type and shall give
discontinuous/intermittent audible alarm automatically whenever a smoke detector or heat
detector operates. The hooter should also have facilities for speaker announcement. Hooter should
also have the capability of adjusting the sound output. Figure shows the hooter cum speaker
arrangement.
The Response Indicator shall glow clearly in case the detector to which it is connected gives an
alarm signal. There shall be two numbers of red LEDs to compensate for fusing of either LED.
Figure shows the response indicator arrangement.
Response Indicator
An emergency voice alarm system shall be installed to meet the requirements of the following
standards, BS 5839-9:2003, BS 5839-8:2008, BS EN 54-24:2008, BS EN 60849, BS EN 54-3:2001
Annex C, BS EN 54-16:2008.
The hydrant system shall manually operate a firefighting facility. In the event of a fire, the fire hoses
are coupled to hydrant valves through the instantaneous couplings and the jet of water is directed
towards the seat of the fire. When water is discharged through hydrant valves header pressure falls
and hydrant pumps are started automatically through pressure switches.
The wet main system shall comprise fire service breeching inlets, fire pump sets, water tank with
level switches, all necessary valves, pipework, hydrants, hose reels, pump motors with starter
panels and all controls. The design, supply, and installation of Wet mains system shall be based on
National Building code, BS-9990 & BS-9999 and NFPA -14/20. The hydrant system will cover the
station buildings and areas through underground/over ground pipework hydrant pumps. The
hydrant system in street level shall be provided with external hydrants. External hydrants shall be
furnished with instantaneous couplings and instantaneous pattern branch pipes. Hoses, branch
pipes, and nozzles for external hydrants will be stored in hose boxes near external hydrants.
Hydrant risers will be provided for the storied station with landing valves at each landing. All risers
shall terminate at the highest point with an air release valve. Hose boxes complete with hoses
branch pipes and nozzles shall be provided alongside landing valves.
The fire pump shall be started automatically on loss of pressure. Two numbers of AC electric motor
driven fire pump for the hydrant system (one working and one standby) shall be provided, which
shall cater to the water requirements of the firefighting system. The complete piping network for the
hydrant system will be kept pressurized. To cater to minor system leakages and to maintain system
pressures a pressurization system consisting of 1 no. Jockey pump shall be provided. These pumps
will be in the fire pump room. Pumps of the hydrant system are sized confirming to NFPA-14 and
National Building Code (NBC). Arrangement of fire pumps in the pump room is provided in figure
below
Fire Hose Cabinet (FHC) with hose reels shall be provided within the stations and depot to ensure
that all floor areas within the stations /depot are reachable by the water jet. The provision and
installation of the fire-fighting hose reels shall be in accordance with NFPA 130, BS EN 671-1, BS
5306-1, BS 5306-3, BS 5306-8, and BS EN 3-7 and National Building Code.
An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in each station/depot and shall comprise of fire
service inlets, pump sets, pump controls, sprinkler heads, pipework, and associated valves, flow-
switches, pressure switches, water motor alarm gong, the water tank, and level switches. The
sprinkler system shall be designed as per NFPA16/ BS EN12845. In the event of fire in rooms, the
sprinkler heads in the area of fire should sense the high temperature and should burst and
discharge water on to the affected area.
All the areas of the station/depot shall be protected with portable Fire Extinguishers in accordance
with the requirements of NFPA-10 and NBC. Fire extinguishers shall be provided and installed as
per BS EN 3-8:2006, BS 5306-3:2009 Code of practice for fire extinguishing installations and
equipment on premises - Commissioning and maintenance of portable fire extinguishers; and BS
5306-8:2000 Code of practice for fire extinguishing installations and equipment on premises;
Selection and installation of portable fire extinguishers. Figure shows the fire extinguisher
arrangement in stations.
All automatic clean gas suppression systems shall be installed to BS EN 15004 & BS EN 10294 and
fully integrated into the main alarm panel. A combination of total flood or localized panel flood
systems shall be employed within the following areas: transformers, switchgear, UPS and DC
Battery System, signalling and communications equipment rooms.
It is necessary to ensure that the toxic gases and other pollutants generated beyond acceptable
limit do not take place and the thermal environment inside the tunnel at all the time is within
tolerable limits for the passenger inside the tunnel. During the emergency of any fire or any train
stalled condition inside the tunnel, the ventilation system provided inside the tunnel helps to
evacuate the passengers safely.
It shall ensure enough airflow relative to moving the train, to keep the concentration of
pollutant gases inside the tunnel within permissible limits
It shall ensure enough airflow to prevent locomotives from overheating and to keep thermal
effects within desirable limits
It shall ensure that pressure transient is within acceptable limits
It should provide a tenable environment along the path of egress from a fire incident in
enclosed train ways
It should produce airflow rates enough to prevent back layering of smoke in the path of egress
within enclosed train ways
It should accommodate the maximum number of trains that could be between ventilation
shafts during an emergency.
The amount of airflow and type of ventilation arrangement required depends upon the level of
concentration of pollutants and maximum temperature likely to be attained inside the tunnel due to
the movement of the train. Level of concentration of pollutants and maximum temperature to be
attained inside tunnel depends upon the following factors
Type of locomotive
Gradient inside tunnel
Length of train
Speed of train
The time interval between two train
Ambient temperature
Length of tunnel
Cross section of tunnel
The direction of prevailing winds etc
TVS is provided in rail tunnel essentially to carry out the following functions:
d) Providing fresh air supply to tunnel and maintenance of smoke free evacuation route during fire
related emergencies.
There are various operating modes (scenarios) for the Tunnel Ventilation System.
Normal operation
The normal condition is when the trains are operating according to timetable throughout the
system, at prescribed headways and dwell times, within given tolerances. The primary source of
ventilation during normal conditions is generated by the movement of trains operating within the
system. The vent shafts to the surface will enable the tunnel heat to be removed due to train
movements.
In the case of shorter tunnels, vent shafts may not be necessary and air exchange between tunnel
and ambient can happen through portals.
Piston effect and therefore natural ventilation is enhanced in twin-tube single-track tunnels while it
is lesser in single-tube twin track tunnels.
Generally, one-dimensional modelling and simulation are performed to assess the effectiveness of
natural ventilation of the tunnel in maintaining acceptable level of temperature.
Congested operation
Congested conditions occur when delays disrupt the movement of trains. Delays may result in
idling of a train in a tunnel section. Occasionally trains need to stop due to track blockage, power
cut off or other reasons. Staying stationary for several minutes or even hours might lead to an
unacceptable temperature rise and pollution level because of releases of waste heat (air-
conditioning, cooling facilities, etc.). Without forced ventilation, excessive tunnel temperatures may
result in reduced performance of coach air conditioners that may lead to passenger discomfort.
During congested operations, the tunnel ventilation system is operated to maintain a specific
temperature in the vicinity of the car air-conditioner condenser coils. The ventilation strategy shall
be such that fresh air will be supplied over stalled train to remove the excessive heat build-up near
air-conditioners condensers and discharged via portal or vent shaft.
Emergency Conditions
When the train catches fire inside a tunnel, the major objective is to drive the train outside of the
tunnel. Evacuation of passengers and firefighting is very much challenging inside a tunnel than
outside.
If the fire incident occurs train is disabled in the tunnel, it is much important to control the
dispersion of smoke to allow for the safe egress of passengers. The tunnel ventilation system may
be required for most of the cases to control the movement of smoke and to provide a smoke-free
path for the evacuation of passengers.
Generally, the design of the tunnel ventilation system worldwide follows NFPA 130 standard
criteria. According to section 7.1.2 of NFPA 130-17,
• The mechanical ventilation system shall not be required if the tunnel length is less than or equal
to 61m.
• The mechanical ventilation system shall be provided if the tunnel length is greater than 305m.
• For the tunnel length between 61m to 305m, an engineering analysis should be done to assess
the feasibility of a non-mechanical ventilation system. If engineering analysis isn’t performed, then
a mechanical ventilation system shall be provided.
➢ Longitudinal flow of air/smoke in incident tunnel: The objective is to achieve the critical
velocity across the annulus (at the location of a train inside the tunnel). The critical velocity is the
minimum velocity required to avoid back layering of smoke (i.e., to push the smoke on one side of
fire) which will protect the evacuating passengers upstream of the fire from the effects of the smoke
shown in Figure and which provides defined access for rescue and firefighting services.
The critical velocity through a tunnel during a fire is defined by the fire size, the tunnel area, height
and gradient of the tunnel. The worst-case conditions are selected and applied uniformly across all
the emergency responses for a tunnel with an appropriate safety factor. A velocity in the order of
three meters per second would suffice but is subject to tunnel conditions.
In the case of twin tube tunnels, the non-incident tube can be used for safe evacuation. Both tubes
are connected by cross-passages. Whenever, a non-incident tube/tunnel is used for evacuation,
fresh air is also supplied to pressurize the non-incident tunnel to prevent the smoke migration via
open cross passages.
Longitudinal ventilation inherently implies the risk of moving smoke in the direction of escaping
passengers and rescue services. Even if the position of fire is known exactly, e.g. in the middle of a
train, this dilemma cannot be eliminated unless local smoke extraction is applied. However,
properly operating the ventilation system can moderate the harmful effects of this ventilation
principle. For example, moderate air velocity at the beginning of an incident will support the smoke
stratification. The advantage of providing defined conditions outweighs by far the disadvantages of
longitudinal ventilation.
Shorter tunnels may be ventilated with impulse-type ventilation systems. These include either jet
fans or Saccardo nozzles. Jet fans or Saccardo nozzles are suited to the shorter tunnels as only a
small pressure head is generated by moving airflows at the critical velocity. For longer tunnels, a
significant amount of airflow will escape out of the local portal making the system more akin to a
push and pull ventilation system.
Longer tunnels require more pressure head that can be delivered by an appropriate number of jet
fans or Saccardo nozzle plant. In these tunnels, push and pull ventilation is required with a
minimum of one ventilation building. This building is usually located at the center of the tunnel or
biased towards the portal that requires a higher critical velocity. In this instance, slightly more than
twice the quantity of air needed to achieve critical velocity is required to be handled by the building.
• Jet fans - May be installed within the rail tunnel; however, the jet fans will be subjected to sonic
waves with high differential pressures generated by the trains moving at high speed. These
differential pressures provide significant shock loads drastically reducing the life of the equipment
and increasing the cost of maintenance.
• Push and pull ventilation - Ventilation stations may be installed on the surface along the route of
urban rail tunnels for longer tunnels. Each building will be configured to supply or exhaust airflows
to generate critical airflows across the train. Each ventilation building shall be required to supply or
exhaust more than twice the required critical airflows to prevent smoke back layering in the tunnel,
allowing for air movement in both directions along the tunnel. Typically, two to four bi-directional
axial fans (with one standby) may be installed in a surface-mounted building with only the
ventilation shaft required to be excavated to the track way. Additionally, intermediate relief air shafts
can be incorporated with little extra cost. Instead of directing airflows through the fans at the
surface level, a damper can be opened to allow air to vent straight into the atmosphere. Figure
shows the Push and pull type ventilation arrangement.
Control
The control of ventilation systems shall be primarily from the Operation Control Centre (OCC)
through the building management system. A set of ventilation scenario shall be developed so that
the operator need only select the appropriate ventilation scenario and the fans will automatically be
correctly configured. Figure shows the control and monitoring of tunnel ventilation equipment from
OCC
On single line sections, tunnels having length up to 1 kms, may not require provision of artificial
ventilation but it should be ensured that levels of concentration of pollutants during passage of
trains are not likely to exceed threshold levels. Tunnels having length more than 2 kms may require
provisions of artificial ventilation, by means of shaft with or without provision of fans, depending
upon results of simulation studies.
Railway applications fixed installations electric traction overhead contact line EN - 50119
Railway application Power supply and rolling stock technical criteria for the EN - 50388
coordination between power supply and rolling stock to achieve
interoperability
Insulators for overhead lines with nominal voltage above 1 kV - insulator EN 60305
units of ceramic material or glass for ac systems - Characteristics of insulator
units lid type and rod type
Specifications of the technical quality of Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) for use in EN 60376
electrical devices
Railway applications - Fixed installations - Electrical safety, provisions for the EN 50122-3
return currents and earthing - Part 3: interactions between traction
systems for alternating current and direct current
Hot Rolled Steel Equal Flange Tees with Radiused Root and Toes EN 10055
Dimensions and Tolerances on Shape and Dimensions
Standards for power transformer’s part 3: Insulation levels, dielectric tests EN 60076-3
and external insulation clearances in air.
Standards for power transformer’s part 4: A Guide for lightning impulse tests EN 60076-4
and operating shock - Power transformers and reactors
Standards for power transformer’s part 10: Determination of noise levels EN 60076-10
Standards for power transformer’s part 12: Loading guide for transfomer EN 60076-12
Power Dry type
Railway applications - power and control cables with fire behaviour EN 50264-1
specify for railway rolling stock - Part 1: General requirements
Railway applications - power and control cables with fire behaviour EN 50264-2
specify for railway rolling stock - Part 2: Single- conductor cable
earthing;
current transformer
EMC - Part 4: technical Testing and measurement - Section 12: immunity EN 61000-4
tests with oscillatory - Basic publication in EMC;
Non-linear resistor type gapped surge arresters for A.C. system IEC 60099-1 & 4
/Metal oxide surge arrester without gaps for a.c. systems
Dimensions of mechanical structures of the 482.6 mm (19 in) series IEC 297-3
A.C. metal enclosed switchgear and control gear for rated voltages IEC 298
above 1 kV and up to and including 72,5 kV
Insulators and fittings for overhead lines. Insulators of ceramic material or IEC 383-1 & 2
glass for overhead line with nominal voltage higher than 1000 V.
Requirements
Extruded solid dielectric insulated power cables and their accessories for IEC 502-2
rated voltage from 6 kV (Um = 7,2 kV) up to 30 kV (Um = 36 kV)
Graphical symbols for diagrams. Part 2: symbol elements, qualifying IEC 617-2
symbols and other symbols having general application.
Common specifications for high-voltage switchgear and control gear IEC 694
standards
Power cables with extruded insulation and their accessories for rated IEC 840
voltage above 30kV (Um = 36 kV) up to 100 kV. Test methods and
requirements.
Earth mesh and earth procedure code IEC 865, IEEE - 80, IS
3043
High Voltage test, definitions and Requirements for on-site testing IEC 60060-3
High Voltage test; Application guide for measuring devices IEC 60060-4
Testing of insulating materials for interior and exterior, ceramic or glass for IEC 60168
systems with a nominal voltage above 1000 V;
Electrical measuring equipment with direct acting records and their IEC 60258
accessories
High-voltage switches. Part 1: Switches for rated voltages above 1 kV and IEC 60265-1
under 52 kV
Dimensions of Indoor and Outdoor Post Insulators and Post Insulator IEC 60273
Units for Systems with Nominal Voltages greater than 1000 V
Electric cables - Calculation of current rating - Part 2-1: Thermal resistance - IEC 60287-2-1, 2-
Calculation of thermal resistance Part 2: Thermal resistance - Section 2: 2
calculation of coefficients for reducing the current carrying capacity for
groups of cables in the open air and protected from direct sunlight
Locking Devices for Ball and Socket Couplings of String Insulator Units IEC 60372
Dimensions and Tests
Insulators for Overhead Lines with a nominal Voltage above 1000 V IEC 60383
Sampling Rules and Acceptance Criteria when applying Statistical IEC 60591
Control Methods for Mechanical and Electromechanical Tests on
Insulators of Ceramic Material or Glass for Overhead Lines with a Nominal
Voltage greater than 1000 V
Test methods for evaluating resistance to tracking and erosion of electrical IEC 60587
insulating materials used in harsh environments, ac systems
Insulating materials based on ceramic or glass - Part 1: Definitions and IEC 60672-1
classification;
Residual strength of string insulator units of glass or ceramic material for IEC 60797
overhead lines after mechanical damage of the dielectric
Control equipment and systems General principles- Power supply and IEC 60870-1-1, 2-
environment conditions Interfaces (electrical characteristics) 1, 3, 4, 5
Performance requirements Transmission protocol
Composite insulators for AC overhead lines of nominal voltage above 1000 IEC 61109
volts. Definitions test methods and acceptance criteria;
Railway applications - Fixed installations - Part 1: protection measures in IEC 62128-1 & 3-1
relation to electrical safety and earthing- Part 3-1: Measurement, control
and protection for specific use in systems AC drive - Application guide
Code of practise for electrical maintenance and supervision of mineral IEC 60422
insulating oil in equipment
This project will run from section Wardha to Yelegaon in Nagpur Division of Central Railway. This
package starts from Belgaon station (CH.163077) to Umarked station (CH. 224003) and project
length is 60.926Kms approximately including the tunnel section.
The Belgaon – Umarkhed section will be single line track with 6 new stations and all stations are
crossing stations provided with 3 lines, out of which one is main line and 2 loop lines.
OBJECTIVES:
To provide the signalling for safe working of trains and to improve the line capacity between The
Belgaon – Umarkhed section.
OVERVIEW:
The Belgaon – Umarkhed section shall be provided by single line with bi-directional signalling
system. Absolute block working shall be considered for block sections.
List of Stations:
1. Belgaon at CH.163077
2. Pusad at CH.179477
3. Harshi at CH.188203
4. Shelona at CH.196828
5. Palshi at CH.208908 and
6. Umarkhed at CH.224003
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS:
All Stations between The Belgaon – Umarkhed section shall be provided with Electronic
Interlocking with Centralized architecture. Electronic Interlocking shall be meet the requirement of
the RDSO specification No: RDSO/SPN/192/2019 Ver. 2.0 OR Latest and shall be procured from the
RDSO approved vendor.
Stations shall be provided with dual VDUs to perform the operations within the station limit.
And also, All stations between The Belgaon – Umarkhed section shall be provided with KAVACH
including Remote interface unit and Onboard KAVACH as per the RDSO Spec.No:
RDSO/SPN/196/2020 Ver. 4.0 or latest. KAVACH has to be interface with Electronic interlocking and
necessary protocols shall be followed to ensuring the safety.
All block sections between The Belgaon – Umarkhed section shall work under absolute block
system.
POWER SUPPLY:
Power supply arrangement shall be provided with Integrated Power supply as per RDSO
Specification RDSO/SPN/165/2012 Rev-3.0 or latest in all stations. Battery bank of 110v/200AH shall
be provided including 5 spare cells along with IPS.
Power supply arrangement shall also require at way side stations AT supply 10KVA, Local supply
compatible for 10KVA and 15KVA DG set green suitable for outdoor installations
SIGNALS:
Multi aspect color light signals shall be provided in The Belgaon – Umarkhed section. LED lamps for
main signals shall confirms to RDSO Spec.No:RDSO/SPN/199/2010 and Subsidiary
signals(shunt/co-on/route indicator) shall confirms to RDSO Spec.no: RDSO/SPN/153/2011 with
latest amendments.
Calling on signals shall be provided on home signals. Independent shunt signals shall be provided
for shunting purpose.
POINT MACHINE:
Electrical point machines IRS type 220mm throw, High thrust (AC immunity 160V AC), non-trailable
to operate on 110v DC complete with Lock & Detector slides, cable termination box and clamp lock
& Ground connections for 60Kg rail confirming to IRS: S24/2002 & Assy Drg. No: RDSO/S/11000 &
for motor IRS: S37/82 shall be provided in all stations.
Crank handles shall be provided for manual operation of point machines during operation failure
from VDU. Key Lock Checking Relays shall be used to interlock the crank handles. KLCR shall be
operate with 24v DC and has to confirm RDSO spec.No. RDSO/SPN/219/2016 with latest
amendments. Crank handles shall be placed at station building.
Train Detection system shall primarily be provided by using DC- track circuits in station section. DC
track circuits has to be provided for entire station area excluding the sidings/ shunting necks.
110v AC power supply shall be used for track feed chargers,which shall confirms Spec. IRS:S-
89/2013 with latest amendments. Choke coil as per RDSO Spec. No: IRS: S-65/83 or latest has to be
provided on relay end.
Track feed Resistance of 30ohms (with tapings at 2,6.8 &16ohms) shall be provided at relay end.
Track lead junction box made of fiber reinforced plastic Drg.SI-10272 Alt. B as per specification No.
IRS: S-I0/78. This included 4 no. of PBT terminals.
BLOCK WORKING:
All block sections between The Belgaon – Umarkhed section shall work under absolute block
system.
It shall not be possible to take off Advanced starter, unless the line clear is received from the station
ahead.
It shall not be possible to give the line clear to the station in rear unless the block section and
overlap beyond the home signal is clear, home signal/advanced starter signal controls are in
normal.
Absolute block system shall be provided by using Universal Fail Safe Block Instrument as per
RDSO Spec.No: IRS:S-104/2012 OR LATEST with Block proving Axle Counter system, RDSO
Spec.No: RDSO/SPN/175/2005 or latest.
Block Instrument function shall work on both OFC and quad cables.
SIGNALLING CABLES:
Underground cables shall be used for signalling purposes. All signalling cables has to be used with
1. sqmm copper cable with 6/12/19/24/30 cores configuration based on the system requirement.
2Cx25 Sq.mm aluminium cables shall be used as power cables for outdoor equipment’s.
4-Quad/6Quad cables may be used for BPAC and one 6 Quad cables has to laid between the
stations for block working. Quad cable shall confirm to IRS:TC 30/2005 with latest amendments.
2x 24 core fiber cable also shall be laid in block section, in which one will work as main and other
one as Redundant to improve the system availability. OFC cables shall be supplied as per RDSO
Specification No. RDSO/SPN/TC/110/2020.
S&D Equipment’s:
Datalogger shall be provided as per RDSO specification NO: IRS: S-99/2006 with latest
Amendments, Earth Leakage Detector shall also be provided as per Spec.No: RDSO/SPN/197 with
latest amendments in all stations.
The status of IPS and ELD shall be monitored in Datalogger by using Potential free contacts.
All input and output relays and repeaters relays in indoor shall be connected to datalogger.
All signalling works including Survey, design, supply, installation, testing and commissioning shall
be executed in accordance with provisions of the Indian Railway standards/Signal Engineering
manual.
DESIGN:
TCAS System:
Proposed section is of single line which shall be used for train movement in both directions
(UP&DN) and hence meticulous monitoring and controlling of train movement is required for safe
movement of rail traffic. Safety movement of train traffic shall be achieved by implementing
indigenously developed TCAS (Train Collision Avoiding System or Kavach) in section. TCAS is an
Automatic Train Protection (ATP) system meant to provide protection to trains against excessive
speed, Signal passing at danger (SPAD) and collision. TCAS provides continuous update of train
movement, during unsafe situations it applies train brake to stop the train even crew failed or not in
position to do so. TCAS also provide moving train information like speed, location, distance signal
ahead, signal aspects and it also has facility send auto or manual distress messages from loco in
case of emergency.
TCAS Overview:
TCAS system consists of stationary, moving components, radio towers and integration elements
with station electronic interlocking. TCAS components –
On Board equipment
On track
The track side sub system of TCAS consists of RFID tags installed on track in both block and station
area for giving information track information to on board TCAS installed in the loco. Track portion
including berthing tracks, points, block section are assigned unique ID called TIN (Track
Identification Number)
Stationary TCAS installed at station with radio tower to communicate with locomotives in station
area also part of TCAS system.
TCAS system proposed to be implemented along the 67km entire stretch which consists of 6
stations and the block sections.
All Subsystem and Components are considered in the TCAS solution, the BOQ shall be prepared
accordingly.
Telecommunication system provides connectivity from OCC (Operational Control Centre) to various
stations and other installations to be monitored/ controlled. Minimum following subsystems will be
part of Telecommunication.
• SDH based OFC network with 2X24 fibre connecting Stations to Stations and 24 fibre connecting
other activity centres with route diversity.
• OFC network will be on STM-16 with PD Mux at every activity centre i.e., Stations, Maintenance
depots, ALH, TSS, SP/SSP, LC gate.
• PBX based Administrative Telephone Network and Direct Line Telephone Network
• Data Networking system of minimum 10GB capacity to support IP based Communication Network
suitable for Voice, Data & Video.
• Wi-Fi at every activity centre i.e., Station, Maintenance depot, TSS, SSP/SP, ALH, LC gate etc.
• Video surveillance & recording system through a network of CCTVs provided at every activity centre
i.e., Station, Maintenance depot, TSS, SSP/SP, ALH, LC gate, Warehouse etc.
• Air-Conditioning of all Telecom Equipment Room (TER) for improving the reliability of equipment.
The Railway Line shall be integrated with Indian Railway Network at multiple layers, and the
communication portion shall provide connectivity for FOIS, Crew Management, other CRIS managed
systems, as and if required, integration with TMS of the Zonal railways to give the information to IR
controllers.
Signalling & Telecom System shall be connected with the IR network using single Line connectivity
With a Fixed block system/ Slot workings.
Apart from the above technical requirement the following are the general requirements that Signalling
and Telecom designs will cater to while designing/ Executing, this includes interfacing with various
other systems and with the following steps/ method.
a. Location survey for the installation of Signalling and Telecom gears for working in all terrains
including tunnels.
b. Minimum distance between Track centres should be adequate such that Signals Posts with
Direction type Route Indicators can be placed in between tracks at the Eye level of Loco Pilots without
infringement of SOD, Route indicators will be generally in the approach or in the station yards
c. For Cable route diversity, sufficient space (ROW) shall be made available during alignment
finalization for laying cable on both sides of railway tracks considering Water drains etc. necessary
interface will be done
d. Provision of RCC structures with fencing arrangement for all Signal & Telecom huts (ALH, TH etc) at
Rail Formation level for Security of safety-critical S&T equipment.
e. Cable laying through Culverts/Bridges should be through concrete ducts/channels provided by Civil
Dept.
The above points will be interfaced with Civil/Alignment/Track experts during the alignment finalization
stage, all basic S&T drawings will be prepared during the DPR stage to ensure that alignment or Civil
design does not overlook S&T requirements.
All design activities and construction work of the tunnel shall conform to the specifications and latest
standards and codes of practice mentioned in this section. The following codes and standards of practice
Request for Proposal (RFP) for Detailed Design and Project Management Consultancy for
Tunnelling Works “Construction of Five Tunnels (Approx. Total Length 7.35 km) between Digras-
Palshi Stations including Construction of Roadbed, Major Bridges, Minor Bridges, ROBs, RUBs,
including Road Approaches, Station Buildings, Staff Qtrs., Other Service buildings, HL Platforms,
COPs, FOBs, P.Way Work, General Electrical Work and S&T Work from Km 157 to Km 225 of
Maharashtra".
Approved Plan & L-Section drawings of Warda- Nanded new BG line via Pusad dated 15-03-2016
MNEC Consultants Pvt. Ltd. has carried out the Geo-technical investigations based on the
investigation plan, specifications and data requirements of RVNL. The fieldwork has been executed
under the guidelines and direct supervision of senior technical personnel and Engineers of RVNL .
1. RDSO/2012/GE:G-0017: June 2012: Ministry of Railways – RDSO Guidelines for Design &
construction of Tunnels.
2019.
11. Indian Railway Standard Specification for fabrication and erection of steel girders March, 2016.
13. Guidelines and Specifications for Design of formation for Heavy Axle Loads- GE 14 July, 2014.
15. IS: 3764: 1966 (Reaffirmed 2022): Code of safety for excavation work
16. IS: 4081: 2013 (Reaffirmed 2018): Blasting and related drilling operations – Code of Safety.
17. IS: 4350: 1967 (Reaffirmed 2022): Concrete porous pipes for under-drainage.
18. IS: 4410: Part 20:1983 (Reaffirmed 2020): Glossary of terms relating to river valley projects, Tunnels
19. IS: 4756: 1978 (Reaffirmed 2022): Safety code for tunneling work
20. IS: 4880: Part 1:1987 (Reaffirmed 2013): Code of practice for design of tunnels conveying water,
General Design.
21. IS: 4880: Part 2:1976 (Reaffirmed 2020): Code of practice for design of tunnels conveying water,
Geometric Design.
22. IS: 4880: Part 3:1976 (Reaffirmed 2020): Code of practice for design of tunnels conveying water,
Hydraulic Design.
23. IS: 4880: Part 4:1971 (Reaffirmed 2020): Code of practice for design of tunnels conveying water,
24. IS: 4880: Part 5:1972 (Reaffirmed 2020): Code of practice for design of tunnels conveying water,
25. IS: 4880: Part 6:1971 (Reaffirmed 2020): Code of Practice for design of tunnels conveying water,
Tunnel Supports.
26. IS: 4991: 1991 (Reaffirmed 2013): Recommendations for grouting of pervious soils.
27. IS: 5878: Part 1:1971 (Reaffirmed 2013): Code of practice for construction of tunnels, Precision
28. IS: 5878: Part 2: Section 1:1970 (Reaffirmed 2020): Code of practice for construction of tunnels,
29. IS: 5878: Part 2: Section 2:1970 (Reaffirmed 2020): Code of practice for construction of tunnels,
30. IS: 5878: Part 2: Section 3:1971 (Reaffirmed 2020): Code of practice for construction of tunnels
conveying water, Underground Excavation in Rock, Tunneling Method for Steeply Inclined Tunnels,
31. IS: 5878: Part 3:1972 (Reaffirmed 2020): Code of practice for construction of tunnels conveying
32. IS: 5878: Part 4:1971 (Reaffirmed 2020): Code of practice for construction of tunnels conveying
33. IS: 5878: Part 5:1976 (Reaffirmed 2020): Code of practice for construction of tunnels conveying
34. IS: 5878: Part 7:1972 (Reaffirmed 2020): Code of practice for construction of tunnels conveying
water, Grouting.
35. IS: 6922: 1973 (Reaffirmed 2018): Criteria for safety and design of structures subject to underground
blasts.
36. IS: 9012: 1978 (Reaffirmed 2021): Recommended practice for shotcreting.
37. IS: 10386: Part 8:1995 (Reaffirmed 2020): Safety Code for Construction, Operation and Maintenance
38. IS: 10386: Part 11:2012 (Reaffirmed 2022): Safety Code for Construction, Operation and Maintenance
39. IS: 11105: 2004 (Reaffirmed 2020): Design and Construction of Tunnel Plugs - Code of Practice
40. IS: 11309: 1985 (Reaffirmed 2021): Method of conducting pull-out test on anchor bars and rock
bolts.
41. IS: 11358: 1987 (Reaffirmed 2020): Glossary of terms and symbols relating to rock mechanics.
42. IS: 12070: 1987 (Reaffirmed 2020): Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Shallow
Foundations on Rocks.
43. IS: 13219: 1992 (Reaffirmed 2018): Rock Bolts for Mines (Cement Grouted) – General Requirements.
44. IS: 13365: Part 1:1998 (Reaffirmed 2021): Quantitative Classification System of Rock Mass
45. IS: 13365: Part 2:2019: Quantitative Classification System of Rock Mass Guidelines, Rock Mass
Quality (Q) for Prediction of Support Pressure, Support System and Engineering Properties in
Underground Openings.
46. IS: 13365: Part 4:2014 (Reaffirmed 2019): Quantitative Classification System of Rock Mass
47. IS: 13517: 1992 (Reaffirmed 2018): Rock bolts - Resin type
48. IS: 14448: 1997 (Reaffirmed 2022): Code of practice for reinforcement of rock slopes with plane
wedge failure.
49. IS: 14458: Part 1: 1998 (Reaffirmed 2017): Guidelines for retaining wall for hill area, Selection of type
of wall.
50. IS: 14458: Part 2: 1997 (Reaffirmed 2017): Guidelines for retaining wall for hill area, Design of
retaining/breast walls.
51. IS: 14458: Part 3: 1998 (Reaffirmed 2017): Guidelines for retaining wall for hill area, Guidelines for
52. IS: 14458: Part 4: 2018: Retaining wall for hill area, Construction of Banded Dry Stone Masonry Walls.
53. IS: 14458: Part 5: 2018: Retaining Wall for Hill Areas - Guidelines, Construction of Cement Stone
Masonry Walls.
54. IS: 14458: Part 6: 2020: Retaining Wall for Hill Areas - Guidelines, Construction of Gabion Walls.
55. IS: 15026: 2002 (Reaffirmed 2022): Tunneling methods in Rock Masses Guidelines.
56. IS: 17446: 2020: Observational Method for Tunnelling in Rock Masses – Guidelines
58. IS: 269: 2015 (Reaffirmed 2020): Ordinary Portland Cement – Specification
59. IS: 383: 2016: Coarse and Fine Aggregate for Concrete - Specification
60. IS: 456: 2000 (Reaffirmed 2021): Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice.
61. IS:875 Part 1: 1987 (Reaffirmed 2018): Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake)
For Buildings and Structures, Dead Loads - Unit Weights of Building Material and Stored Materials.
62. IS: 800: 2007 (Reaffirmed 2017): General Construction in Steel - Code of Practice
63. IS:1489: Part 1: 2015 (Reaffirmed 2020): Portland Pozzolana Cement – Specification, Fly Ash Based.
64. IS:1489: Part 2: 2015 (Reaffirmed 2020): Portland Pozzolana Cement – Specification, Calcined Clay
Based.
65. IS:1566: 1982 (Reaffirmed 2020): Hard-drawn Steel Wire Fabric for Concrete Reinforcement.
66. IS: 1786: 2008 (Reaffirmed 2018): High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete
reinforcement.
67. IS: 1893: 1984 (Reaffirmed 2018): Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures.
68. IS: 1893: Part 1:2016: Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures - General Provisions and
Buildings.
69. IS: 1893: Part 3:2014: (Reaffirmed 2019): Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures -
70. IS: 2062: 2011 (Reaffirmed 2021): Hot Rolled Medium and High Tensile Structural Steel
71. IS: 9103: 1979 (Reaffirmed 2018): Specification for Admixtures for Concrete.
72. IS:12330: 1988 (Reaffirmed 2019): Specification for Sulphate Resisting Portland cement
73. IS: 13920: 2016 (Reaffirmed 2021): Ductile Design and Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures
74. IS: 4138: 1977 (Reaffirmed 2022): Safety Code for Working on Compressed Air.
75. IS:7293: 1974 (Reaffirmed 2022): Safety Code for working with construction Machinery.
76. IS: 823-1964 - Code of procedure for manual metal Arc welding of mild steel.
77. IS: 816-1969 -Code of practice for use of Metal Arc welding for General Construction in Mild steel.
78. IS: 1200 (Part-XXV) 1971-- Methods of Measurement of Building and Civil Engineering works.
81. IS: 458: 2021: Precast Concrete Pipes (with and without reinforcement).
82. IS 11384 – Code of Practice for Composite Construction for Structural Steel and Concrete.
84. IS: 1929: 1961 (Reaffirmed 2021): Specification for Hot Forged Steel Rivets for Hot Closing (12 to 36
mm Diameter)
85. IS: 2155: -1982 (Reaffirmed 2021): Cold Forged Solid Steel Rivets for Hot Closing (6 to 16 mm
Diameter)
87. IS 102-1962 for Paint ready mixed red lead, non- setting.
88. IS: 1367: Part 1: 2014 (Reaffirmed 2019): Technical Supply Conditions for Threaded Steel Fasteners
89. SP 7: 2016: National Building Code of India 2016 (Vol I and II)
1. ÖGG (2014): Geotechnical Monitoring in Conventional Tunnelling, Handbook, Austrian Society for
2. ÖGG (2010): Guideline for the geotechnical design of underground structures with conventional
excavation - Ground characterization and coherent procedure for the determination of excavation
and support during design and construction, Austrian Society for Geomechanics, 2010, Salzburg.
6. Standard for Fixed Guideway Transit and Passenger Rail Systems, NFPA 130, 2020
8. Guide for the application of the SRT TSI, European Union Agency for Railways
6.4. Textbooks
2. Tunnel Engineering Handbook, John O. Bickel, Thomas R. Kuesel, Elwyn H. King 2004
5. Design and Construction of Pavements and Rail Tracks - Geotechnical Aspects and Processed
10. Engineering Rock Mass Classification - Tunnelling, Foundations and Landslides, Bhawani Singh,
2011
12. Design of Underground Structures, Cui, Z.D., Zhang, Z-L., Yuan, L., Zhan, Z.X., Zhang, W.K, 2020.
13. Ground Characterization and Structural Analyses for Tunnel Design, Benjamín Celada, Z.T.
Bieniawski, 2019
14. Reliability-Based Design in Soil and Rock Engineering: Enhancing Partial Factor Design
17. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis - Methods and Software, Alessio Ishizaka, 2013
19. Rock mechanics and the design of structures in rock, L Overt and W. I. Duval, 1967
20. Rock Mechanics for Underground Mining, Brady, and Brown, 2006
23. Hoek E, Kaiser P. K, Bawden W.F (1995): Support of Underground Excavations in Hard Rock
24. Reinforced Concrete Design, S. Unnikrishna Pillai and Devdas Menon, 2009
6.5. Literatures
2. OGG (2010): The Austrian practice of Convectional Tunneling NATM, Austrian Society for
Geomechanics, 2010.
4. PIRAC Guidelines.
7. Important design aspects of Railway Tunnel – World Tunnel Congress 2013 Geneva Under Ground-
8. Barton, N., Bieniawski, Z.T., “RMR and Q: Setting the Record Straight”, Tunnels and Tunnelling
9. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures” by YMA Hashash, JJ Hook, Birger Schmidt
and John I-Chiang Yao (ref Tunneling and Underground Space Technology 16 (2001) 247-293)
6.6. Software
Sl.
Name of the Software Developer Remarks
#
PLAXIS 2D CONNECT
2 Bentley
Edition
PLAXIS 3D CONNECT
4 Bentley
Edition
7. DELIVERABLES
8. PROJECT SCHEDULE
A detailed Work Programme of the Design Stage has been drafted of the TOR and Key Deliverables, The
workflow of the project has been ensured and linking dependencies have been drafted for stage-wise and
discipline-wise submissions and approvals.
The Consultant is a certified firm, committed to project quality assurance and implementing quality
assurance management systems. The purpose of this quality plan is to outline procedures, processes and
management systems for fulfilling its services and contractual responsibilities in the best possible manner.
The Consultant’s quality policy is to provide reliable, consistent, high quality and cost-effective services to its
clients.
Consistency
Quality
Completeness Control Accuracy
Objectives
Reliable
Providing adequate resources to achieve this policy and the company’s quality objectives
Regularly review the quality policy and objectives for continuing suitability
The Consultant works on sound quality control and quality assurance procedures. The quality of
deliverables is ensured by the originator, checker and approver mechanism internally, that ensures the
deliverables are of highest standards.
Project control shall be achieved by the effective use of the Consultant’s project management tools, which
shall provide the key to meeting project schedule milestones. A simple 4-step management framework is
proposed for smooth delivery of the project.
The Consultant shall establish a project-specific Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) and set up a system of
internal audit and approval of all designs, including calculations, drawings and other documents prepared
for submission to the Client. The project Team Leader shall be responsible for initiating and implementing
QAP with a focus on design organisation, responsibilities, methods/procedures, design check, verification,
and approval. The QAP shall be submitted by the Consultant to the Client for approval before any
implementation.
To ensure quality, reviews shall be undertaken at each stage of the design process. A multiple review
process is proposed to ensure quality by allowing for internal technical and commercial reviews before
issuing for a broader team review. The broader review allows for the cross-discipline review, with a parallel
focus on safety, risk, value and constructability. Feedback from the review process is incorporated into the
design which then undergoes a series of cross-checks to ensure that all the comments have been closed
and the scope of works have been complied with.
A Quality Assurance Checklist shall accompany each work package through the review process to
demonstrate the capture and closure of the review comments. All relevant checklists shall be maintained
for each design and drawing generated in accordance with ISO documentation. All the check prints and
checklists shall be reviewed periodically by the Team Leader and maintained till the end of the project.
The process of Quality control for various disciplines of work is illustrated below, Flow process for Quality
Control.
Peer Review
Report Discipline Lead Review
Preparation Independent Review by Quality Team
Peer Review
Output to
Discipline Lead Review
Discipline 2
Input to Discipline Independent Review by Quality Team
3 and so on
All works will be undertaken in accordance with relevant policies and procedures followed by the
consultant in its projects. The requirements of Quality Management are addressed by the formats and
checklists that are followed in-house design processes to enhance the quality of the projects delivered.
The Project Coordinator may arrange in audits of any part of the project delivery process to ensure
compliance with QAP.
Team Leader shall ensure that any submission to the Client shall be done only if it passed through the
following review process:
Peer Review: detailed first level check to ensure that there are no calculation or concept errors
Discipline Lead review – overall check to ensure adherence to relevant codes, design criteria and
project objectives
Interdisciplinary review – detailed check to ensure compatibility with each design/concept of each
discipline
Independent Verification review – a separate quality control team within the design team shall
check the designs and drawings as a third-party check
Project Design Coordinator shall ensure that the check process is being followed as structured above by
periodic review of the documents.
To ensure quality in the submissions, Design Management works in step-by-step manner as described in
the Flowchart below:
For a project of this scope and magnitude, it is imperative that a Document Control Management Plan be
established to lay the foundation for quality, traceability, retrievability and history for complete project
documentation.
All deliverables of the project shall be listed in the Drawing and Design register. Each drawing and
document shall be uniquely referenced by a number and shall define both the current status and revision of
the drawing and the date of revision. Internal and external revisions shall be specifically highlighted. All
submissions made to the Client shall have a transmittal notes and compliance sheet for comments.
In addition to the document register, the following documents shall also be maintained and reviewed and
updated on regular basis during the execution of the project:
Progress reports
Change Register
Risk Register
In this section monitoring of Safety, Health & Environment aspects during the execution of project as per
supplement EIA and EMP is elaborated.
The Consultant is responsible for the implementation of the requirements of the contract in accordance
with the RVNL Safety Occupational Health and Environment manual. This section describes the
methodology proposed for Monitoring of Safety, Health, and Environment aspects during the execution of
project as per supplement Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Mitigation Plan
(EMP).
The Consultant is responsible through Health, Safety & Environment Expert for supervision and reporting of
the Safety, Health and Environmental related activities to RVNL to apprehend any untoward incident
towards Health & Safety,
A highly professional team has already been engaged for an on-time successful delivery of the project. The
Team Leader shall have the overall responsibility of the project for all disciplines and the Design
Coordinator is responsible for overall Interface Management and Project Integration The team structure for
executing the proposed scope of works under the contract are given below:
Vamsi Bankuru
Design
Coordinator
Ramirez Pedro
Team Leader- Chief Tunnel
Design Engineer
Project Communication Management essentially entails keeping the right people informed of the right
information in a timely manner, ensuring that all parties to the project are kept informed of the project
status on a timely basis. It ensures a quality framework and develops critical links among people, ideas,
and information that are necessary for Project success.
Project coordination meetings will be arranged as required, which shall include meetings with the
team members and other inter-disciplinary integration. The coordinator will be responsible for ensuring the
recording and distributing Minutes of each meeting. Project records will be retained on Project files.
As we understand communication, there are two different but interrelated levels of communication. The first
level being Internal Communication and the second External Communication.
All technical discussions and submissions corresponding to each discipline shall take place between the
Discipline lead, Engineers, and Project Design Coordinator. All technical submissions, discipline-wise, shall
be submitted by the Discipline lead after due approval from the Design Coordinator and Team Leader.
Input to and Output from each discipline for the design process shall be received by the Design
Coordinator before transfer to the respective team with proper documentation. The Project Manager shall
check for integration issues, if any, with other disciplines.
The channel proposed for internal communications of the project is illustrated in Figure XXX Internal
Communications Channel.
Discipline 1
Discipline 1
Design/ CAD
Lead
Engineer
Sub
Design Project
Team Leader Consultants/
Coordinator Coordinator
Agencies
Discipline 2
Discipline 2
Design/ CAD
Lead
Engineer
The Design Coordinator shall liaise with the Client for all the communications. Formal communication shall
only be in the form of emails or letters. Communication over any other media shall be ratified over email
within 24 hours of such interaction. Day to day communications shall be handled by phone calls and
emails. To strictly control the proper flow of information and correct communication, all emails shall be
addressed to or copied to Design Coordinator. Regular coordination meetings shall be initiated to keep the
Client up to date regarding the progress of work and bottlenecks faced. The Consultant shall attend
progress meetings called for by the Client. All queries or comments issued by the Client shall also be duly
responded.
The channel proposed for external communications of the project is illustrated below.
Project
Coordinator
Design
Client
Coordinator
Discipline Lead
There are two more very important aspects within the communication management to be considered:
Confidentiality of communications must be clearly and precisely defined by the consultant as confidentiality
is a key issue to be taken into account. It is necessary to distinguish between non-official communication
and official communication. Therefore, official channels of communication and non-official
communications are defined, and their validity limits established.
Progress shall be reviewed on a planned vs actual basis. Weekly/Monthly/Quarterly progress review shall
be done at the Team Leader level with Design Coordinator/ Project Coordinator, Discipline Leads, Interface
Managers, and supervisors. Mobilization, progress of activities, Interface elements, Quality, Safety, and other
crucial parameters shall be regularly reviewed. During the review, the Consultant shall discuss the support
required from the Client to overcome the hinderances caused in the project and for quick resolution of
issues. Catch-up plans shall be decided to achieve targets based on the decisions made in the meeting.
Minutes of meeting shall be prepared including the actions items with responsibilities and way forward
discussions and circulated to all attendees and concerned for necessary action.
Consultant shall submit daily report including significant events, if any, on the previous day and shall submit
Monthly progress reports within 7 days of the end of each month, considering the progress of the month
mentioning cumulative progress and details on progress of checking designs/ drawings/ approval of
drawings and specifications for construction, deployment of technical and supervisory staff by the
Contractor and progress of construction work with reference to targets. The consultant shall hold meetings
and propose recovery plans if applicable, upon client’s request.
Consultant shall also submit Quarterly Reports within 14 days of the end of each quarter. Quarterly reports
shall include a description of project activities illustrated by progress/completion photographs, status of any
delays and detailed plan to make up any shortfall or deficiency, status of contractual claims and details of
all latest financial projections.
Proforma of the weekly, monthly, and quarterly reports attached as Annexure 01.
14. APPENDICES
The Kick-off meeting was held at RVNL’s Delhi Office on 3 rd Aug 22. Minutes of Meeting (MOM) and
presentation shown during the meeting are attached as Annexure XX & XX respectively.