Kering Group Global Strategy Paper
Kering Group Global Strategy Paper
Kering Group Global Strategy Paper
Strategy is
at the heart of an organization, determining the direction the company follows and how they
plan to differentiate themselves in the long run from competition, to create a sustainable
competitive advantage. Throughout this course, we had the opportunity to reflect on various
strategic decisions multinationals face, however, the prime one that stood out to me the most
were on how to develop competitive advantages, global/ localization strategies as well as the
During the first session, the focus was on introducing the concept of strategy and the framework
discussing the importance of using internal as well as external analysis tools to set goals and
form a strategy accordingly. Knowing who a company is and what they stand for is important
for any global manager. Internal appraisal using the “resource-based model” can help build this
awareness of what differentiates us as well as how to leverage and expand our core
competencies or resources to make them valuable, rare and imitable whilst implementing them
effectively to capture value, creating a long-term competitive edge. This is important for any
future manager as this influences the entire strategic direction of a company in order to ensure
there is this cohesive “fit” between the company’s resources or capabilities with their strategic
goals and the way the company is marketed to consumers. Class discussions really emphasized
that any mismatch in strategy can negatively affect consumer perceptions about the company,
From the readings it was also evident that we cannot only assess a firm from an internal
perspective, but it is also important to consider the external forces that can influence and
challenge the strategic goals of a company. To obtain the full picture, external analysis tools
such as Pestel, Porters 5 forces, CAGE can provide managers with an understanding of why
certain firms succeed in the industry, what macroeconomic changes either provide
opportunities or can threaten their competitive position and can act as a driving force for
change. Managers will only be able to build a competitive edge and make effective strategic
choices if both the internal analysis and external analysis are aligned with the overarching
strategy. This is important learning for me as an aspirational future manager, which I got to
truly understand by conducting the MNC individual paper. My strategic analysis on Kering
provided the opportunity for practical application of the various frameworks to truly
conceptualize the class learnings. This practical application was very insightful as it helped to
build awareness and provided practice in analysing and identifying a firm’s business model
and resources/capabilities to really pinpoint what makes a company unique and the different
external forces that can harm their competitive edge, which is a key task and challenge faced
Another key learning was the importance of effectively deciding which parts of a strategy to
localize and which can be globally integrated whilst balancing the trade-offs of both. Trade-
offs arise with every decision; hence, it is very important for manager to have a deep
understanding of their industry and the market they are targeting to effectively adapt their
strategy accordingly. I was never fully aware of the implications that can arise from a conflict
in strategy where the corporate strategy is misaligned with the market they are targeting. The
Lundbeck Korea case highlighted the importance for managers to gain local insights and
countries/regions. For instance, some countries have more prominent and rigid tastes and social
norms, in turn, demanding more localized approach which requires adaptation to local
preferences.
A key topic that stuck with me throughout the course and really intrigued me was sustainability.
Sustainability regulations and demands from consumers are rising; however, they are still
nowhere close to where they need to be. As a result, companies are found in a position where
they are not actively pursuing an ethical strategy or supply chain as often the legal limit lay
below what is good for society and the environment and it is simply not seen as a ‘must’. The
Sobeys case pinpointed the role of consumers as a key barrier to making sustainability a priority
within firms, which provided a new viewpoint on the matter for me. Before I always considered
the legal side of things in the sense that firms will ensure they only meet the legal requirements
unless it is one of the firm’s core values. However, here it emphasized that since consumers
are not actively demanding it, the majority are not willing to pay a premium for it, placing firms
Similarly, the class debate about the H&M case study really emphasized that cultures influence
an individual’s ethics and perceptions on topics and explains why it has been so hard to make
sustainability a norm. For example, many students had opposing views when discussing how
workers are being exploited by companies with terrible working conditions and low wages.
Where some considered it a huge scandal others perceived it as a means for economic
development and that having a low underpaid job is better than no job at all. I recognize the
value from discussing these topics and I believe sustainability is unquestionably the way to go
for the future. As consumer awareness grows, it will start enforcing change as consumers will
start questioning the type of products they buy and from which companies, ultimately forcing
insightful as it offered a wide range of unique perspectives and viewpoints on global strategic
issues multinational face by using articles, class discussions and real-life case analysis which
truly allowed to apply knowledge and gain a deeper understanding of the topics at hand.