0% found this document useful (0 votes)
129 views8 pages

Mark Sanders (STEM)

The document discusses the origins and evolution of the term STEM and STEM education. It traces how STEM initially referred to the individual fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics but has grown in popularity and ambiguity over the past two decades. The author advocates for an approach called integrative STEM education that purposefully combines technological design and scientific inquiry by engaging students in problem-solving contexts. This represents a new frontier compared to traditional disconnected STEM subject education.

Uploaded by

elefantemartinez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
129 views8 pages

Mark Sanders (STEM)

The document discusses the origins and evolution of the term STEM and STEM education. It traces how STEM initially referred to the individual fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics but has grown in popularity and ambiguity over the past two decades. The author advocates for an approach called integrative STEM education that purposefully combines technological design and scientific inquiry by engaging students in problem-solving contexts. This represents a new frontier compared to traditional disconnected STEM subject education.

Uploaded by

elefantemartinez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania

9pDXibJXe[\ij

I
OUIFT UIF/BUJPOBM4DJFODF'PVOEBUJPO /4'

A series of circumstances CFHBOVTJOHi4.&5wBTTIPSUIBOEGPSiTDJFODF NBUI
FNBUJDT FOHJOFFSJOH BOEUFDIOPMPHZw8IFOBO/4'
has once more created an QSPHSBNPĊDFSDPNQMBJOFEUIBUi4.&5wTPVOEFE
UPPNVDIMJLFiTNVU wUIFi45&.wBDSPOZNXBTCPSO"T
opportunity for technology SFDFOUMZBT SFMBUJWFMZGFXLOFXXIBUJUNFBOU.BOZ
UIBUZFBSBTLFEJGUIF45&.&EVDBUJPOHSBEVBUFQSPHSBN*
educators to develop and was beginning to envision had something to do with stem
DFMMSFTFBSDIͳBUXBTTUJMMWFSZNVDIUIFDBTFJO'BMM 
implement new integrative XIFOXF‰UIF5FDIOPMPHZ&EVDBUJPO1SPHSBNGBDVMUZBU
7JSHJOJB5FDI‰MBVODIFEPVS45&.&EVDBUJPOHSBEVBUF
approaches to STEM education program. 1 But when Americans learned the world was flat
'SJFENBO 
UIFZRVJDLMZHSFXUPCFMJFWF$IJOBBOE
championed by STEM education India were on course to bypass America in the global econ
PNZCZPVU45&.NJOHVT'VOEJOHCFHBOUPnPXUPXBSEBMM
reform doctrine over the past two UIJOHT45&. BOE45&.NBOJBTFUJO/PX OFBSMZFWFSZPOF
TFFNTTPNFXIBUGBNJMJBSXJUIUIF45&.BDSPOZN
decades.
And yet, it remains a source of ambiguity. Technology edu
DBUPSTQSPVEMZMBZDMBJNUPUIF5BOE&JO45&.#VUTP UPP 
EP$BSFFSBOE5FDIOJDBMFEVDBUPST XIP JONZIPNFTUBUF 
BUMFBTU
TFFNUPIBWFDMBJNFEUIFi&wBTUIFJSPXO.PTU 
FWFOUIPTFJOFEVDBUJPO TBZi45&.wXIFOUIFZTIPVMECF
TBZJOHi45&.FEVDBUJPO wPWFSMPPLJOHUIBU45&.XJUIPVU
education is a reference to the fields in which scientists,
FOHJOFFST BOENBUIFNBUJDJBOTUPJM4DJFODF NBUIFNBUJDT 
and technology teachersBSF45&.educators working in
45&.education. It’s an important distinction. In addition,
UIFSFJTUIFDPNNPONJTDPODFQUJPOUIBUUIFi5w GPSUFDI
OPMPHZ
NFBOTDPNQVUJOH UIFSFCZEJTUPSUJOHUIFJOUFOEFE
NFBOJOHPGUIF45&.BDSPOZN4VĊDFJUUPTBZ 45&.JT
often an ambiguous acronym, even to those who employ it.

ͳF/BUJPOBM4DJFODF'PVOEBUJPOLOPXTXIBUJUNFBOT'PS
OFBSMZUXPEFDBEFT /4'IBTVTFE45&.TJNQMZUPSFGFS
to the four separate and distinct fields we know as science,
technology, engineering, and/or mathematics. Yet, some

1
8FBEEFEUIJTBTOFXHSBEVBUFQSPHSBNBU7JSHJOJB5FDI 
complementing our Technology Education graduate program,
which we have no intention of relinquishing.

20 t THE TE C HNOLO GY TE AC HER t December/Januar y 2009


IBWFTVHHFTUFEUIBU45&.FEVDBUJPOJNQMJFTJOUFSBDUJPO A pedagogy we refer to as “purposeful design and inquiry”
among the stakeholders. It doesn’t. For a century, science, 1%*
JTBTFNJOBMDPNQPOFOUPGJOUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDB
technology, engineering, and mathematics education have UJPO1%*QFEBHPHZQVSQPTFGVMMZDPNCJOFTUFDIOPMPHJDBM
established and steadfastly defended their sovereign territo design with scientific inquiry, engaging students or teams
SJFT*UXJMMUBLFBMPUNPSFUIBOBGPVSMFUUFSXPSEUPCSJOH of students in scientific inquiry situated in the context of
them together. UFDIOPMPHJDBMQSPCMFNTPMWJOH‰BSPCVTUMFBSOJOHFOWJSPO
ment. Over the past two decades of educational reform,
'PSUIPTFSFBTPOT *BNTLFQUJDBMXIFO*IFBS45&.FEVDB technology education has focused on technological design,
tion used to imply something new and exciting in education. while science education has focused on inquiry. Following
Upon close inspection, those practices usually appear sus UIF1%*BQQSPBDI TUVEFOUTFOWJTJPOJOHBOEEFWFMPQJOH
piciously like the status quo educational practices that have solutions to a design challenge might, for example, wish
NPOPQPMJ[FEUIFMBOETDBQFGPSBDFOUVSZ1FOEJOHFWJEFODF to test their ideas about various materials and designs, or
UPUIFDPOUSBSZ *UIJOLPG45&.FEVDBUJPOBTBSFGFSFODF UIFJNQBDUPGFYUFSOBMGBDUPST FH BJS XBUFS UFNQFSBUVSF 
to business as usual—the universal practice in American GSJDUJPO FUD
VQPOUIPTFNBUFSJBMTBOEEFTJHOT*OUIBU
schools of disconnected science, mathematics, and technol way, authentic inquiry is embedded in the design challenge.
PHZFEVDBUJPOyBDPOEJUJPOUIBUNBOZCFMJFWFJTOPMPOHFS ͳJTJTQSPCMFNCBTFEMFBSOJOHUIBUQVSQPTFGVMMZTJUVBUFT
serving America as well as it should/might. scientific inquiry and the application of mathematics in the
context of technological designing/problem solving. Inquiry
Introducing…Integrative STEM Education of that sort rarely occurs in a technology education lab, and
*O'BMM  XFSFBMJ[FEUIFBDSPOZNTBNCJHVJUJFTXFSF technological design rarely occurs in the science classroom.
JOFTDBQBCMF BOEUIVTSFUJUMFEPVSOFX(SBEVBUF1SPHSBN But in the world outside of schools, design and scientific
i*OUFHSBUJWF45&.&EVDBUJPOwͳBUXBTJNQPSUBOUUPVT inquiry are routinely employed concurrently in the engi
because, from the onset, we intended the program to focus OFFSJOHPGTPMVUJPOTUPSFBMXPSMEQSPCMFNT
TRVBSFMZVQPOOFXJOUFHSBUJWFBQQSPBDIFTUP45&.FEVDB
tion and to investigate those new integrative approaches Many technology teachers are fond of saying they teach
4BOEFST 4BOEFST8FMMT 
2 Our notion of inte science and math in their technology education programs.
HSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPOJODMVEFTBQQSPBDIFTUIBUFYQMPSF In truth, it is exceedingly rare for a technology teacher to
teaching and learning between/among any two or more of explicitly identify a specific science or mathematics concept
UIF45&.TVCKFDUBSFBT BOEPSCFUXFFOB45&.TVCKFDU or process as a desired learning outcome and even rarer
BOEPOFPSNPSFPUIFSTDIPPMTVCKFDUT+VTUBTUFDIOPMPHJDBM for technology teachers to assess a science or mathematics
endeavor, for example, cannot be separated from social and learning outcome. Technology education students might
aesthetic contexts, neither should the study of technology be very well do some arithmetic or recognize a scientific prin
disconnected from the study of the social studies, arts, and ciple at play en route to completing a design challenge, but
IVNBOJUJFT0VS*OUFHSBUJWF45&.&EVDBUJPOHSBEVBUFQSP those design challenges are almost never conceived to pur-
HSBNFODPVSBHFTBOEQSFQBSFT45&.FEVDBUPST BENJOJT posefully teach a desired science or mathematics learning
trators, and elementary educators to explore and implement outcome. Thought of in this way, the notion of “purposeful
JOUFHSBUJWFBMUFSOBUJWFTUPUSBEJUJPOBM EJTDPOOFDUFE45&. design and inquiry” represents a new frontier in education—
education. BGSPOUJFSUPXBSEXIJDIJOUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPO
research and practice are targeted.

*OUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPOJTOPUJOUFOEFEBTBOFXTUBOE
BMPOFTVCKFDUBSFBJOUIFTDIPPMTBDDPNQBOJFECZOFX
2
'SPNUIFPOTFUJO 7JSHJOJB5FDIT*OUFHSBUJWF45&.&EVDB iJOUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPOwMJDFOTVSFSFHVMBUJPOT BTTPNF
UJPO(SBEVBUF1SPHSBNIBTPĉFSFEUIF."&% &E4 &E% BOE NJHIUTVTQFDU(JWFOUIFBNPVOUPGDPOUFOULOPXMFEHFOFD
1I%EFHSFFPQUJPOT*O'BMM XFBEEFEBTFNFTUFSIPVS FTTBSZUPCFBOFĉFDUJWFTDJFODF NBUIFNBUJDT PSUFDIOPM
*OUFHSBUJWF45&.&EVDBUJPO(SBEVBUF$FSUJmDBUF1SPHSBN"MMPG ogy educator, it’s very difficult to imagine a new teaching/
UIF*OUFHSBUJWF45&.&EVDBUJPODPVSTFXPSLXBTOFXMZDPODFQUV MJDFOTVSFQSPHSBNUIBUXPVMEQSFQBSFJOEJWJEVBMQSFBOE
BMJ[FEBOEEFWFMPQFEFYQMJDJUMZGPSUIFTFOFXEFHSFFPQUJPOT BOE
PSJOTFSWJDFUFBDIFSTXJUITVĊDJFOUTDJFODF NBUIFNBUJDT 
JTBWBJMBCMFPOMJOF1SPHSBNTJOPUIFSVOJWFSTJUJFTXJMM JODSFBTJOHMZ 
DBSSZUIFi45&.&EVDBUJPOwNPOJLFS#VUUPEBUF XFBSFBXBSFPG
and technology content expertise—and the pedagogical
no other programs—graduate or undergraduate—that focus spe content knowledge—to teach all three bodies of knowledge
DJmDBMMZVQPOJOUFHSBUJWFBQQSPBDIFTUP45&.FEVDBUJPO FĉFDUJWFMZ

21 t THE TE C HNOLO GY TE AC HER t December/Januar y 2009


3BUIFS 7JSHJOJB5FDIT*OUFHSBUJWF45&.&EVDBUJPOHSBEV Why Integrative STEM Education?
BUFQSPHSBNPĉFSTBOFXCPEZPGLOPXMFEHFGPSDVSSFOUBOE
Conventional STEM Education Leaves too Many
QSFTFSWJDF45&.FEVDBUPST JOUSPEVDJOHUIFNUPUIFGPVO
Students Behind
dations, pedagogies, curriculum, research, and contempo
SBSZJTTVFTPGFBDIPGUIF45&.FEVDBUJPOEJTDJQMJOFT BOE ͳFGBDUUIBUFBDIPGUIFGPVS45&.FEVDBUJPODPNNVOJUJFT
to new integrative ideas, approaches, instructional materials, has engaged in massive and ongoing educational reform
and curriculum. In doing so, the program prepares/enables FĉPSUTPWFSUIFQBTUZFBST FH """4  "#&5 
them to better understand and integrate complementary *5&"  /$5. /3$ 
JT
DPOUFOUBOEQSPDFTTGSPN45&.EJTDJQMJOFTPUIFSUIBOUIFJS DPOWJODJOHFWJEFODFPGUIFTFSJPVT45&.FEVDBUJPODIBM
PXO*OUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPOJTJNQMFNFOUFEJOWBSJPVT MFOHFTUPCFBEESFTTFEͳF45&.FEVDBUJPOFTUBCMJTINFOU
XBZT*OTPNFDBTFT 45&.FEVDBUPSTJNQMFNFOUJOUFHSBUJWF IBTMPOHCFMJFWFE45&.FEVDBUJPOIBTOUCFFOXPSLJOHBT
BQQSPBDIFTXJUIJOUIFJSPXO45&.DPVSTFTGBDJMJUJFT*O well as it should, and has been toiling steadfastly to make
TPNFDBTFT 45&.FEVDBUPSTCFHJOXPSLJOHUPHFUIFSBDSPTT improvements. But instead of praising their successes,
their disciplines in pairs or teams. In some cases, school QVCMJDDPODFSOIBTFTDBMBUFE*OSFDFOUZFBST UIFi45&.
divisions are beginning to think about systemic changes to pipeline” problem—the decrease in the number of students
45&.FEVDBUJPOUIBUJODPSQPSBUFJOUFHSBUJWFBQQSPBDIFTUP QVSTVJOH45&.mFMET QBSUJDVMBSMZUIPTFGSPNIJTUPSJDBMMZ
45&.FEVDBUJPO VOEFSSFQSFTFOUFEQPQVMBUJPOT‰IBTCFFOXJEFMZQVCMJDJ[FE
Much of the attention has focused on addressing the short
Two progressive school divisions in Virginia—Arlington age of qualified science and mathematics teachers, a prob
$PVOUZBOE-PVEPVO$PVOUZQVCMJDTDIPPMT‰IBWF DPN MFNUIF/P$IJME-FGU#FIJOE"DU 
IBTUBSHFUFEͳF
CJOFE
FOSPMMFENPSFUIBOIJHITDIPPMUFBDIFSTBOE /$-#MFHJTMBUJPOIBTSFTVMUFEJOJODSFBTFEBUUFOUJPOUPTDJ
BENJOJTUSBUPSTJOPVSPOMJOF*OUFHSBUJWF45&.&EVDBUJPO ence and mathematics teacher education, alternative routes
courses/certificate program this semester, to assist them in to licensure, and new avenues for attaining “highly qualified”
USBOTGPSNJOHUIFDVMUVSFPG45&.FEVDBUJPOJOUIFJSTDIPPM teaching status.
EJWJTJPOT*OUIJTXBZ PVSJOUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPO
courses represent a robust professional development oppor Less attention has been paid to the infrastructure and peda
tunity, wholly consistent with a new body of research that HPHZPGDPOWFOUJPOBM45&.FEVDBUJPO*OUFHSBUJWF45&.
DPODMVEFTQSPGFTTJPOBMEFWFMPQNFOUJTNPTUFĉFDUJWFXIFO FEVDBUJPODIBMMFOHFTUIFBTTVNQUJPOUIBUNPSF45&.
TJUFCBTFEBOETVTUBJOFEPWFSBOFYUFOEFEQFSJPEPGUJNF educators prepared in conventional ways to teach in con
*OFĉFDU PVSDPVSTFTFOHBHF45&.FEVDBUPSTJOSFnFDUJOH ventional settings is the best way to approach the problems
upon integrative practice continuously from one semester PG45&.FEVDBUJPO5PPNBOZTUVEFOUTMPTFJOUFSFTUJO
to the next. Moreover, they introduce45&.FEVDBUPSTUP science and mathematics at an early age, and thus make an
one another across disciplines through course assignments FBSMZFYJUGSPNUIFTPDBMMFEi45&.QJQFMJOFw$POWFOUJPOBM
UIBUSFRVJSFDSPTTEJTDJQMJOFDPMMBCPSBUJPO4FWFSBMPSNPSF approaches to science and mathematics education have,
TFNFTUFSTXPSLJOHXJUI45&.FEVDBUPSTbeyond one’s own in fact, prepared some students to be as capable in science
discipline is a powerful means of facilitating new integrative and mathematics as any in the world. But, at the same time,
alliances and approaches, and for developing understanding there is widespread concern regarding the large percentage
PGPUIFS45&.FEVDBUJPODVMUVSFT45&.BENJOJTUSBUPST of students who opt out of “rigorous” science and math
and elementary educators are also enrolling in our online ematics middle and high school courses, and for the many
courses/programs. This is exciting to us because elementary students who graduate high school with relatively low sci
HSBEFTPĉFSVOJRVFPQQPSUVOJUJFTGPSJOUFHSBUJWFBQQSPBDIFT ence and/or mathematics ability.
UP45&.FEVDBUJPOBOEBSFBCTPMVUFMZUIFQMBDFUPCFHJO
UIFTFJOUFHSBUJWFBQQSPBDIFT*G"NFSJDBIPQFTUPFĉFDUJWFMZ There is sufficient evidence with regard to achievement,
BEESFTTUIFi45&.QJQFMJOFwQSPCMFN XFNVTUmOEXBZTPG interest, and motivation benefits associated with new inte
EFWFMPQJOHZPVOHMFBSOFSTJOUFSFTUJO45&.FEVDBUJPOBOE HSBUJWF45&.JOTUSVDUJPOBMBQQSPBDIFTUPXBSSBOUGVSUIFS
must sustain that interest throughout their remaining school implementation and investigation of those new approaches.
years. Therein lies the real potential and promise of integra 4FBTPOFEFEVDBUPSTVOEFSTUBOEUIFJNQPSUBODFPGJOUFSFTU
UJWF45&.FEVDBUJPO and motivation to learning, constructs validated by the find
ings of cognitive scientists over the past three decades. It
GPMMPXT UIFSFGPSF UIBUJOUFHSBUJWF45&.JOTUSVDUJPO JNQMF
NFOUFEUISPVHIPVUUIF1DVSSJDVMVN IBTQPUFOUJBMGPS

22 t THE TE C HNOLO GY TE AC HER t December/Januar y 2009


greatly increasing the percentage of students who become 4JNJMBSMZ UIFUFDIOPMPHZFEVDBUJPODPNNVOJUZIBT 
JOUFSFTUFEJO45&.TVCKFDUTBOE45&.mFMETͳFSFJTBEJT throughout its history, promoted curricular connections
UJODUQPTTJCJMJUZUIBUi45&.MJUFSBDZGPSBMMwNBZQBZHSFBUFS XJUITDJFODFBOENBUIFNBUJDTFEVDBUJPOͳFTFi54.
EJWJEFOETJOUIFMPOHSVOUIBOi45&.QSFQBSFEOFTTGPSDPM connections” became a primary focus for technology
lege entrance examinations.” FEVDBUPSTJOUIFT FH -B1PSUF4BOEFST 
4BOEFST#JOEFSVQ 
BOENBOJGFTUFEJO4UBOEBSE
Exemplar of STEM Education Reform #3 of Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the
ͳFJNQMFNFOUBUJPOPGOFXJOUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPO Study of Technology *5&" 
XIJDISFBET
approaches is a logical extension of the past two decades i4UVEFOUTXJMMEFWFMPQBOVOEFSTUBOEJOHPGUIFSFMBUJPOTIJQT
PG45&.FEVDBUJPOSFGPSNFĉPSUTͳFcentral theme among technologies and the connections between technol
of Science for All Americans """4 
XIJDIXBT ogy and other fields of study,” with subtext that focuses spe
EFTJHOFEUPHVJEFFEVDBUJPOBMSFGPSNUISPVHI JTUIF cifically upon connections with science and mathematics.
critical importance of addressing the inherent connections
among science, mathematics, and technology. Benchmarks ͳFnBWPSPGJOUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPOSFTPOBUFTJOTFW
for Science Literacy """4 
SFXSPUFUIPTFJEFBTJO eral of the engineering accreditation standards that grew out
terms that provide the fundamental rationale for integra PGUIFFOHJOFFSJOHFEVDBUJPOSFGPSNFĉPSUTi B
BOBCJMJUZ
UJWF45&.FEVDBUJPOiThe basic point is that the ideas to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineer
and practice of science, mathematics, and technology are so JOH  C
BOBCJMJUZUPEFTJHOBOEDPOEVDUFYQFSJNFOUT BT
closely intertwined that we do not see how education in any XFMMBTUPBOBMZ[FBOEJOUFSQSFUEBUB BOE E
BOBCJMJUZUP
one of them can be undertaken well in isolation from the GVODUJPOPONVMUJEJTDJQMJOBSZUFBNTw "#&5 
ͳF
othersw<JUBMJDTBEEFE>ͳFTFJEFBTMFEUPUIFi4DJFODFBOE national mathematics standards—Principles and Standards
Technology” standard in the National Science Education for School Mathematics /$5. 
‰BSFOUBTFYQMJDJU
Standards /3$ 
XIJDIWFSZDMFBSMZTUJQVMBUFTUIBU with regard to “integrative” approaches as are science, tech
“technological design” be taught in the science curriculum nology, and engineering education, but language through
UISPVHIPVUHSBEFT,BTBXBZPGBDRVJSJOHiBCJMJUJFTPG out the mathematics standards encourages the teaching
UFDIOPMPHJDBMEFTJHOw4PNF JODMVEJOHNF NJHIUDIBMMFOHF BOEMFBSOJOHPGNBUIFNBUJDTJOUIFDPOUFYUPGSFBMXPSME
the idea of technology as science, but there can be no doubt QSPCMFNT-PPLJOHCFZPOE45&.FEVDBUJPOSFGPSN UIF
that the ideals underlying science education reform promote i4DJFODF 5FDIOPMPHZ BOE4PDJFUZwTUBOEBSEJOUIFOBUJPOBM
JOUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPO social studies standards also very clearly supports connec
UJPOTXJUICPUITDJFODFBOEUFDIOPMPHZFEVDBUJPO /$44 



Grounded in the Findings of the Learning Sciences


*OUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPOJTHSPVOEFEJOUIFUFOFUTPG
constructivism and the findings of three decades of cogni
UJWFTDJFODF#SVOJOH 4DISBX /PSCZ BOE3POOJOH 

identified the following set of cognitive themes that resonate
XJUIJOUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPO
t -FBSOJOHJTBDPOTUSVDUJWF OPUBSFDFQUJWF QSPDFTT
t .PUJWBUJPOBOECFMJFGTBSFJOUFHSBMUPDPHOJUJPO.
t 4PDJBMJOUFSBDUJPOJTGVOEBNFOUBMUPDPHOJUJWF
development.
t ,OPXMFEHF TUSBUFHJFT BOEFYQFSUJTFBSFDPOUFYUVBM
In accordance with these cognitive themes growing from the
MFBSOJOHTDJFODFT JOUFHSBUJWF45&. FH 1%*
BDUJWJUJFT
are exemplars of constructivist practice in education. They
QSPWJEFBDPOUFYUBOEGSBNFXPSLGPSPSHBOJ[JOHBCTUSBDU
understandings of science and mathematics and encourage
TUVEFOUTUPBDUJWFMZDPOTUSVDUDPOUFYUVBMJ[FELOPXMFEHF
of science and mathematics, thereby promoting recall and
Standards for Technological Literacy. MFBSOJOHUSBOTGFS*OUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPOQFEBHPHZ

23 t THE TE C HNOLO GY TE AC HER t December/Januar y 2009


JTJOIFSFOUMZMFBSOFSDFOUFSFEBOELOPXMFEHFDFOUFSFE references, resources, materials, tools, and equipment so
#SBOTGPSE #SPXO $PDLJOH 
BOEXIFOVTFEXJUI DMPTFMZSFTFNCMJOHTPDJFUZPVUTJEFUIFTDIPPM
groups of learners, provides a remarkably robust environ Maley responded to the opportunity by developing his
ment for the social interaction so critical to the learning i3FTFBSDIBOE&YQFSJNFOUBUJPOwDPVSTF XIJDITJUVBUFE
process. mathematics and science in the context of technological
activity, while most of the field then, as now, focused their
Moreover, there is growing evidence that integrative FOFSHJFTPOSFEFmOJOHJUTFMGBTBTUBOEBMPOFEJTDJQMJOF JO
JOTUSVDUJPOFOIBODFTMFBSOJOH)BSU[MFS 
DPOEVDUFE SFMBUJWFJTPMBUJPOGSPNUIFSFTUPGFEVDBUJPO )FSTDICBDI 
BNFUBBOBMZTJTBDSPTTJOEJWJEVBMTUVEJFTPGUIFFĉFDUT 

PGJOUFHSBUFEJOTUSVDUJPOPOTUVEFOUBDIJFWFNFOU)FS
DPODMVTJPOTJODMVEFE 
TUVEFOUTJOJOUFHSBUFEDVSSJDVMBS )FSFXFBSFBHBJO"TFSJFTPGDJSDVNTUBODFTIBWFPODF
programs consistently outperformed students in traditional more created an opportunity for technology educators
DMBTTFTPOOBUJPOBMTUBOEBSEJ[FEUFTUT JOTUBUFXJEFUFTUJOH to develop and implement new integrative approaches to
QSPHSBNT BOEPOQSPHSBNEFWFMPQFEBTTFTTNFOUT BOE 
 45&.FEVDBUJPODIBNQJPOFECZ45&.FEVDBUJPOSFGPSN
integrated curricular programs were successful for teach doctrine over the past two decades. Is this opportunity
ing science and mathematics across all grade levels and TPNFIPXEJĉFSFOUGSPNUIFQSFWJPVTPQQPSUVOJUJFT *TUIFSF
XFSFFTQFDJBMMZCFOFmDJBMGPSTUVEFOUTXJUICFMPXBWFSBHF BOZSFBTPOUPCFMJFWFJOUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPOQSBDUJDFT
BDIJFWFNFOUMFWFMT4JNJMBSMZ TUVEJFTPGTDJFODFBOEPS NJHIUFNFSHFJOUIFEFDBEFTBIFBE
mathematics taught in the context of design have been
shown to improve achievement, interest, motivation, and Absolutely. First, “technological literacy for all” has begun
TFMGFĊDBDZ UPSFTPOBUFXJEFMZUISPVHIPVU45&.FEVDBUJPO4DJFODF
FEVDBUJPOJTMPPLJOHGPSXBZTUPBEESFTTUIFJSi4DJFODFBOE
Consistent with Technology Education’s General 5FDIOPMPHZwTUBOEBSE*O UIFNational Assessment
Education Philosophy of Educational Progress /"&1
XJMMCFHJOUPBTTFTTUFDI
The ideology of the field now called technology education OPMPHJDBMMJUFSBDZBDSPTTUIF64GPSUIFmSTUUJNFͳF
IBTBMXBZTCFFOHSPVOEFEJOHFOFSBMFEVDBUJPO #POTFS
.PTTNBO *5&"  3JDIBSET 4BWBHF
4UFSSZ 8BSOFS FUBM 8JMCFS 8PPEXBSE 

*OUFSFTUJODVSSJDVMBSDPOOFDUJPOTXJUITDJFODF NBUI
FNBUJDT BOEFOHJOFFSJOHEBUFTUPUIFT XIFO$BMWJO
8PPEXBSE‰BNBUIFNBUJDTQSPGFTTPS‰CFHBOFNQMPZJOH
manual training methods with mathematics and engineer
ing students. The field’s mantra—“technological literacy for
all”—clearly reflects its general education philosophy. For
UIFTFSFBTPOT JOUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPO XIJDIQSPNPUFT
learning through connections among science, mathematics,
UFDIOPMPHZFEVDBUJPO BOEPUIFSHFOFSBMFEVDBUJPOTVCKFDUT 
is wholly consistent with the ideology of the profession.

The Zeitgeist is Right for Integrative STEM Education


)BMGBDFOUVSZBHP UIFMBVODIPG4QVUOJLQSFDJQJUBUFENBKPS
FEVDBUJPOBMSFGPSNBDSPTTBMMPGFEVDBUJPO.BMFZ 

SFDPHOJ[FEUIFPQQPSUVOJUZGPSUIFQSPGFTTJPOUPCFNPSF
integrative:
It is at this point as never before in the history of educa
tion that industrial arts can enter into its own with one
PGJUTUSVFWBMVFTSFDPHOJ[FE8IFSFFMTFJOUIFTDIPPMJT
there the possibility for the interaction and application
of mathematical, scientific, creative, and manipulative
abilities of youngsters to be applied in an atmosphere of 4QVUOJL

24 t THE TE C HNOLO GY TE AC HER t December/Januar y 2009


/BUJPOBM"DBEFNZPG&OHJOFFSJOH /"&
UIPVHIUFOPVHIPG POMZUFDIOPMPHZFEVDBUJPODSFEJUTJOIJHITDIPPM
the Standards for Technological Literacy content standards DPNQBSFEUPJONBUIFNBUJDTBOEJOTDJFODF
ͳF
UPFOEPSTFUIFNFOUIVTJBTUJDBMMZJOUIF'PSFXPSEiy*5&" /BUJPOBM"DBEFNZPG&OHJOFFSJOHT3FQPSU Technically
has successfully distilled an essential core of knowledge and Speaking, recommended that federal and state educational
TLJMMTXFNJHIUXJTIBMM,TUVEFOUTUPBDRVJSFw.PSFPWFS  policymakers “encourage the integration of technology con
NAE produced “Technically Speaking: Why All Americans UFOUyin non-technology subject areasw<JUBMJDTBEEFE>ͳF
/FFEUP,OPX.PSFBCPVU5FDIOPMPHZ 1FBSTPO:PVOH  i4DJFODFBOE5FDIOPMPHZwTUBOEBSEPGUIF National Science

BOEDPOEVDUFEBUXPZFBSTUVEZUIBUDVMNJOBUFE Education Standards /3$ 
QSPNPUFTUIFUFBDIJOHPG
in the publication of Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing UFDIOPMPHJDBMEFTJHOJOTDJFODFDMBTTGSPN(SBEFT,
Technological Literacy /"& 
'PVSZFBSTBHP BGUFS
ZFBSTPGPQFSBUJOH UIF"NFSJDBO4PDJFUZPG&OHJOFFSJOH Technology education’s future in American education will
&EVDBUJPOFTUBCMJTIFEBOFX,&OHJOFFSJOH%JWJTJPO  depend upon its ability to demonstrate relevance to the
which passed a resolution two years ago expressing its inter school curriculum. I believe “technological literacy” will
est in collaborating with the technology education commu mOEBIPNFJOUIFUXFOUZmSTUDFOUVSZTDIPPMDVSSJDVMVN
OJUZJO,FEVDBUJPO ͳFRVFTUJPOJT8IBUSPMFXJMMUFDIOPMPHZFEVDBUJPOQMBZ
XJUISFHBSEUPiUFDIOPMPHJDBMMJUFSBDZGPSBMMw 4PNFCFMJFWF
But far more powerful than these “shared interests” among QSFFOHJOFFSJOHDPVSTFTIBWFBCSJHIUGVUVSFJOUIF,
UIF45&.FEVDBUJPOmFMETJTUIFSBQJEMZFNFSHJOHBXBSF DVSSJDVMVN*UTNPSFMJLFMZUIBUQSFFOHJOFFSJOHDPVSTFTXJMM
OFTTJO"NFSJDBUIBUUFDIOPMPHZJTOPUKVTUBVCJRVJUPVT CFQFSDFJWFEBTUPPiWPDBUJPOBMwGPS(SBEFT,.PSFPWFS 
component of contemporary culture, but also one of the QSFFOHJOFFSJOHDPVSTFTJO(SBEFTBOEBEESFMBUJWFMZ
critical keys to global competitiveness. The publication little to American education, simply because most of those
The World is Flat 'SJFENBO 
DPOWJODFE"NFSJDBOT enrolling in such courses have already chosen the engineer
UIBUUIF64JTMPTJOHHSPVOEUP$IJOBBOE*OEJBJOUIF ing pathway.
global economy. Friedman pointed squarely at the roles
UIBU45&.BOE45&.FEVDBUJPOQMBZJOUIFHMPCBMDPN In contrast, “technological literacy” delivered through inte
QFUJUJPOGPSXFBMUIBOEQPXFS$PSQPSBUF"NFSJDBIFBSE HSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPOPĉFSFOPSNPVTQPUFOUJBMGPSBMM
the message, and political machinery began to grind. The TUVEFOUTUISPVHIPVU,FEVDBUJPO*OBEEJUJPOUPBEESFTT
/BUJPOBM4DJFODF#PBSET0DUPCFSSFQPSU‰A National ing the “technological literacy for all” challenge, it has the
Action Plan for Addressing the Critical Needs of the Science, potential to motivate young learners with regard to the
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education System 45&.TVCKFDUTBTOFWFSCFGPSFBOEUIFQPUFOUJBMUPNBJOUBJO
SFGFSFODFTi45&.wUJNFTBTPGUFOBTJUSFGFSFODFTiTDJFODF UIFJSJOUFSFTUJO45&.TVCKFDUTUISPVHIPVUUIFNJEEMFBOE
BOENBUIFNBUJDTw PSiNBUIFNBUJDTBOETDJFODFw
4JNJMBSMZ IJHITDIPPMZFBST*GTP JOUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPOXPVME
UIFi"NFSJDB$PNQFUFT"DUwGPDVTFTBUUFOUJPOPOUIF5 add enormously to American education, culture, and global
BOE&JO45&. BTTVHHFTUFECZJUTGPSNBMUJUMFi"NFSJDB competitiveness. Technology education has a key role to
$SFBUJOH0QQPSUVOJUJFTUP.FBOJOHGVMMZ1SPNPUF&YDFMMFODF QMBZJOJOUFHSBUJWF45&.FEVDBUJPO BOEDPVMEQMBZBTJH
JO5FDIOPMPHZ &EVDBUJPO BOE4DJFODF"DUw*O UIF OJmDBOUSPMFJOUXFOUZmSTUDFOUVSZ"NFSJDBOFEVDBUJPOJGJU
/BUJPOBM(PWFSOPST"TTPDJBUJPOUBSHFUFE45&.FEVDBUJPO can demonstrate relevance in this way.
for funding. And so on and so forth.
References
"NJETUUIFSFBMJ[BUJPOUIBUUIF5BOE&XJMMQMBZBDSJUJDBM "#&5&OHJOFFSJOH"DDSFEJUBUJPO$PNNJTTJPO 

SPMFXJUISFHBSEUPPVSXFMGBSFJOUIFUXFOUZmSTUDFOUVSZ  ABET criteria for accrediting engineering programs.
the call for support has shifted from “science and mathemat #BMUJNPSF .%"#&5 *OD"VUIPS
JDTwUPi45&.BOE45&.FEVDBUJPOwThat’sXIBUJTEJĉFSFOU "NFSJDBO"TTPDJBUJPOGPSUIF"EWBODFNFOUPG4DJFODF
BCPVUUIFUXFOUZmSTUDFOUVSZ BOEUIBUJTXIZJOUFHSBUJWF 
Benchmarks for science literacy, Project 2061.
8BTIJOHUPO %$"VUIPS
45&.FEVDBUJPOJTNPSFDPNQFMMJOHUPEBZUIBOJOEFDBEFT
"NFSJDBO"TTPDJBUJPOGPSUIF"EWBODFNFOUPG4DJFODF
past. 
Science for all Americans. 8BTIJOHUPO %$
Author.
Relevance to 21st Century Education #POTFS '(.PTTNBO -$ 
. Industrial arts for
5FDIOPMPHZFEVDBUJPOJTOPOFYJTUFOUJOUIF,DVSSJDVMVN elementary schools. New York: Macmillan.
#SBOTGPSE +% #SPXO "- $PDLJOH 33 &ET

The National Center for Educational Statistics /$&4 


How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and
SFQPSUTUIBUUIFBWFSBHFIJHITDIPPMHSBEVBUFFBSOFE school.8BTIJOHUPO %$/BUJPOBM"DBEFNZ1SFTT

25 t THE TE C HNOLO GY TE AC HER t December/Januar y 2009


#SVOJOH 3) 4DISBX +( /PSCZ .. 3POOJOH  4BOEFST .&#JOEFSVQ , 
Integrating technology
33 
Cognitive psychology and instruction. education across the curriculum."NPOPHSBQI3FTUPO 
$PMVNCVT 0)1FBSTPO VA: International Technology Education Association.
'SJFENBO 
The world is flat. A brief history of the 4BWBHF &4UFSSZ - &ET
 
A conceptual frame-
twenty-first century/FX:PSL'BSSBS 4USBVTBOE(JSPVY work for technology education3FTUPO 7"*OUFSOBUJPOBM
(BSNJSF &1FBSTPO ( &ET
Tech tally: Technology Education Association.
Approaches to assessing technological literacy. 8BSOFS 8& (BSZ +& (FSCSBDIU $+ (JMCFSU )( 
8BTIJOHUPO %$/BUJPOBM"DBEFNZ1SFTT -JTBDL +1 ,MFJOUKFT 1- 1IJMMJQT ,  

)BSU[MFS %4 
A meta-analysis of studies conducted A curriculum to reflect technology3FQSJOUPGBQBQFS
on integrated curriculum programs and their effects on presented at the annual conference of the American
student achievement%PDUPSBMEJTTFSUBUJPO*OEJBOB *OEVTUSJBM"SUT"TTPDJBUJPO 
&QTJMPO1J5BV
University. 8JMCFS (0 
Industrial arts in general education.
)FSTDICBDI %3 
8IBUJTQBTUJTQSPMPHVF 4DSBOUPO 1"*OUFSOBUJPOBM5FYUCPPL$PNQBOZ
Industrial arts and technology education. Journal of 8PPEXBSE $. 
Manual training in education.
Technology Studies, 22 
 /FX:PSL4DSJCOFS8FMGPSE
International Technology Education Association.

Standards for technological literacy:
Content for the study of technology.3FTUPO 7""VUIPS Mark Sanders is Professor and Program
*OUFSOBUJPOBM5FDIOPMPHZ&EVDBUJPO"TTPDJBUJPO 
 Leader, Technology Education, at Virginia
Technology for all Americans: A rationale and structure Polytechnic Institute and State University,
for the study of technology.3FTUPO 7""VUIPS Blacksburg, VA. He can be reached via
-B1PSUF +4BOEFST . 
5FDIOPMPHZ TDJFODF NBUI email at [email protected].
FNBUJDTJOUFHSBUJPO*O&.BSUJO &E
Foundations
of technology education: Yearbook #44 of the council
on technology teacher education1FPSJB *-(MFODPF
.D(SBX)JMM
.BMFZ % 
3FTFBSDIBOEFYQFSJNFOUBUJPOJOUIF
KVOJPSIJHITDIPPMThe Industrial Arts Teacher, 18, pp.
3FQSJOUFEJO-FF 3BOE4NBMMFZ -) 

4FMFDUFE3FBEJOHTJO*OEVTUSJBM"SUT#MPPNJOHUPO *-
.D,OJHIU.D,OJHIU 
/BUJPOBM$FOUFSGPS&EVDBUJPOBM4UBUJTUJDT 
Career
and technical education in the United States: 1990 to
20053FUSJFWFE4FQUFNCFS  GSPNODFTFEHPW
QVCTQEG
/BUJPOBM$PVODJMGPSUIF4PDJBM4UVEJFT 
Expectations
of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies
teachers4JMWFS4QSJOH .BSZMBOE"VUIPS
/BUJPOBM$PVODJMPG5FBDIFSTPG.BUIFNBUJDT 

Principles and standards for school mathematics. 3FTUPO 
VA: Author.
/BUJPOBM$PVODJMPG5FBDIFSTPG.BUIFNBUJDT 

Curriculum and evaluation standards for school math-
ematics3FTUPO 7""VUIPS
/BUJPOBM3FTFBSDI$PVODJM 
National science educa-
tion standards8BTIJOHUPO %$/BUJPOBM"DBEFNZ1SFTT
1FBSTPO (:PVOH "5 &ET
 
Technically speak-
ing: Why all Americans need to know more about tech-
nology.8BTIJOHUPO %$/BUJPOBM"DBEFNZ1SFTT
3JDIBSET $  0DUPCFS
"OFXOBNFManual Training
Magazine, 

4BOEFST .  /PWFNCFS
A rationale for new
approaches to STEM education and STEM educa-
tion graduate programs.1BQFSQSFTFOUFEBUUIFSE
Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education
$POGFSFODF /BTIWJMMF 5/
4BOEFST .8FMMT +  4FQUFNCFS
STEM gradu-
ate education/research collaboratory1BQFSQSFTFOUFE
to the Virginia Tech faculty, Virginia Tech.

26 t THE TE C HNOLO GY TE AC HER t December/Januar y 2009


Integrative STEM Education
300 War Memorial Hall (0313)
Liberal Arts
College of Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
540-231-5598
and Human Sciences
http://www.soe.vt.edu/istemed/

Integrative STEM Education refers to technological / engineering design-based learning


approaches that intentionally integrate content and process of science and/or mathematics education with
content and processes of technology / engineering education. Integrative STEM education may be
enhanced through further integration with other school subjects, such as language arts, social studies, art,
etc.” (Sanders, M. E. & Wells, J.G., 2006-2011).

References Sanders, M. E. (December 2008). STEM, STEM


Education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher,
Sanders, M. E., Lee, H., & Kwon, H. (2011). pp. 20-26.
Integrative stem education: Contemporary trends
and Issues. Korean Journal of Secondary Education Sanders, M. E. & Wells, J. G. (2007, March 16).
Research, 59(3), 729-762. Virginia Tech’s STEM Education Graduate Degree
Options. Paper presented at the ITEA Conference.
Sanders, M. E. (2011, June). Introduction to Integrative San Antonio, TX.
STEM Education. Invited paper presented in Seoul
and Daegu, Korea, June Sanders, M. E. & Wells, J. G. 2007). “New ‘Integrative
STEM Education’” Program: Courses & Degree
Sanders, M. E., & Wells, J. G. (2010, October 1). Options” http://www.soe.vt.edu/istemed/. Retrieved
Integrative STEM Education: Virginia Tech 10/07.
Response to National STEM Education Reform
Effort. Paper presented at the Southeast Technology Sanders, M. E. (2006, November 3). A Rationale for
Education Conf, Blacksburg, VA. New Approaches to STEM Education & STEM
Education Graduate Programs. Paper presented at
Sanders, 2011, Sanders, M. E. (2010, September). the 93rd Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher
Integrative STEM Education & Career Readiness. Education Conference, Nashville, TN.
Invited Talk Presented to the New York State Board
of Regents, Albany, NY. Sanders, M. E. (2006-2011). Integrative STEM
Education Course Syllabi & Instructional
Sanders, M. & Wells, J. G. (2010, February 12). Materials: STEM Education Foundations; STEM
Integrative STEM Education. Paper presented at the Education Trends & Issues, STEM Education
Virginia Department of Education Webinar, Seminar. http://www.soe.vt.edu/istemed/
Integrative STEM/Service-learning.
Sanders, M. E. & Wells, J. G. (2005, September 16).
Sanders, M. E. (2009, November 6). STEMmania: STEM Graduate Education / Research
Wither Technology Education? Paper presented at Collaboratory. Proposal presented to the School of
the Technology Education Association of Education, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Pennsylvania Conference.
Sanders, M. E. (2004). Integrated STEM Education Lab
Sanders, M. E. (2009, February 23). Integrative STEM design. Presented to VT School of Education ($1
Education for PK-12 Education. Paper presented at million lab completed August, 2011).
the Triangle Coalition Conference, Washington,
DC. Wells, J. G. (2006-2011). Integrative STEM Education
Course Syllabi & Instructional Materials: STEM
Sanders, M. E. (2009, March 27). Beyond Engineering Education Pedagogy; STEM Education Research;
Education: Integrative STEM Education. Paper STEM Education Seminar; Biotechnology Literacy
presented at the ITEA Conference, Louisville, KY. by Design; STEM Education Field Study;
Sanders, M. E. (2008, November 14). Integrative STEM http://www.soe.vt.edu/istemed/
Education. Paper presented to the ITEA Wells, J. G. (2008, November). STEM Education: The
Technology Education Advisory Council. Charlotte, Potential of Technology Education. Paper presented
NC. at the 95th Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher
Education Conference, St. Louis, MO.

Invent the Future


V I R G I N I A P O L Y T E C H N I C I N S T I T U T E A N D S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y
An equal opportunity, affirmative action institution

You might also like