Editorial Manager Reviewer Tutorial
Editorial Manager Reviewer Tutorial
This document is the confidential and proprietary information of Aries Systems Corporation, and may not be disseminated or
copied without the express written permission of Aries Systems Corporation. The information contained in this document is
tentative, and is provided solely for planning purposes of the recipient. The features described for this software release are likely
to change before the release design and content are finalized. Aries Systems Corporation assumes no liability or responsibility for
decisions made by third parties based upon the contents of this document, and shall in no way be bound to performance therefore.
Editorial Manager is a registered trademark and the property of Aries Systems Corporation.
Reviewer Tutorial
Reviewer Software Requirements
Registering with EM
Duplicate Registration check
Possible Outcome of Duplicate User Test
Registration Process
Custom Registration Questions
Multiple E-mail Address Request
Logging In
Changing a password
Submitting a review
Reviewer Attachments
Uploading Files as Part of a Review (Reviewer Attachments)
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html
Difficulties with installing or using this Acrobat Reader should be reported to the publication’s IT department for
assistance. Adobe also offers a help database for the free Reader at this address:
http://www.adobe.com/support/products/acrreader.html
For general Software and Hardware requirements when using EM, please use the following link:
http://www.editorialmanager.com/homepage/homefaq10.html
A pop-up alert box is displayed if a user accesses the system with an unsupported browser.
If the Publication Office has registered for a Reviewer, the first time the user logs in to the system, he or she will be
prompted to enter more information.
Registering with EM
The ‘Register’ option is found in the main toolbar for a Publication’s EM site. New users simply click on
‘REGISTER’.
Note: It is important that a new user enters his or her name exactly as he or she is known. It is not unusual
for variations of spelling to cause duplicate entries into the database.
If a user may already be registered, he or she should click on ‘Yes.’ If he or she is certain that he/she is not already
registered, then he/she should click on ‘No’. The system will now present the user with the registration page, where
the First Name, Last Name, or E-mail address may be changed.
If no matches are found (i.e., no duplicates), then the user will proceed to the second step in the Registration process.
Note: Information fields marked with asterisks (*) cannot be left empty.
If the Publication does not use this feature, and a new user would like the Editorial Office to know that he or she is
available as a Reviewer, he or she can set the Option “Available as a Reviewer?” to ‘Yes’. This means that when an
Editor is searching for Reviewers, this user’s name will appear in a list of possible Reviewers. However, a new
registrant simply stating that he or she is available to review does not assign a ‘Reviewer’ role. The Editorial Office
must then designate the user as a Reviewer in the EM System.
If the Publication is using classifications, the Reviewer may also select personal classifications from the predefined
list. This will give the Editorial Office the ability to match personal areas of expertise to manuscripts with the same
classifications.
Note: If the Editorial Office has set up classifications as a required field, users must select areas of expertise from
this predefined list.
The predefined list can be expanded or collapsed by clicking the [+] or [-] checkboxes. To select, check the
appropriate classification, and click on the ‘Select’ button. The number of Personal Classifications allowed is
determined by the Publication. When the appropriate areas of expertise have been selected, click on the ‘Submit´
button on the bottom of the page.
If the Publication is using Personal Keywords, users may enter free-form Keywords that identify areas of expertise
not included in the predefined Personal Classifications list.
Note: If the Editorial Office has set up Personal Keywords as a requirement, users must enter the minimum number
of Keywords indicated.
A preferred username must be entered at the bottom of the form. Failure to enter a username or any other required
information for registration will result in the display of the following warning:
When all information has been provided, click the ‘Continue >>’ button at the bottom to proceed.
A ‘Registration Confirmation’ page will appear, allowing users to ensure that the correct information has been
entered.
If all fields are correct, click on ‘Continue >>’.The registration process is now complete, and the user may close the
browser to check e-mail for the password that has been sent by the system.
If the Publication has opted to require that users respond to registration questions, the following step will appear
before the registration process can be completed. A box with an asterisk next to it indicates required information.
The questions are completely configurable by the Editorial Office. Once the necessary information has been
provided, click on the Continue button to proceed.
Go to the Publication’s EM website. A set of menu options are available from the main navigation menu at the top
of the screen. Click on ‘LOGIN’ as shown below:
The Editorial Manager Login screen (see below) will be displayed. The Reviewer enters a username and password
in the appropriate fields. If asked to review a paper, the user should click on the tab labeled ‘Reviewer Login’.
This will display the ‘Reviewer Main Menu’, which will contain a list of functions that the Reviewer role has been
given permission to perform on the system.
Within EM there are ‘ROLE’ families to which users belong. Each role is given a set of permissions and a user can
have multiple roles on the Publication. When a user is first registered they will, by default, belong to the
‘AUTHOR’ family. If asked to review a paper, the Reviewer then clicks on the button labeled ‘Reviewer Login’.
However, if at any time in the future, a Reviewer would like to submit a paper to the Publication, he or she would
need to click on the button labeled ‘Author Login’.
Once successfully logged in, the Reviewer will be brought to the Main Menu, which will display any New Reviewer
Invitations, Pending or Completed assignments – these links are also referred to as ‘Folders’. The number of
assignments within each folder will be displayed by the side of the entry.
The ‘Update My Information’ page dialog boxes will be displayed (see below):
The user will then be redirected to the Reviewer Registration screens where he or she may look at all of the
information currently available to the Publication, and may update fields as appropriate.
Once changes have been made, the user clicks on the button labeled ‘Submit’. EM will check to see if all of the
required fields have been completed – if not, the following warning will be displayed:
The user may return to the information pages (click on the ‘<< Previous Page’ button), or can simply click on the
button labeled ‘Continue >>’.
By clicking ‘Agree to Review’, the submission will move from the ‘New Reviewer Invitations’ folder and to the
‘Pending Assignments’ folder, where the Reviewer can begin the review process. Reviewers will also be given
confirmation that an invitation has been accepted, as follows:
Clicking ‘Decline to Review’ will alert the Editorial Office that the Reviewer will not be reviewing the paper. The
system will ask for the reason why he or she is unable to review and will also ask the Reviewer to suggest other
potential Reviewers.
Deep Links
Deep Links are hyperlinks that the Editorial Office may include in any e-mail notification that they send or that are
sent as part of the automated invitation element of EM. E-mail deep links are available for the following Reviewer
actions:
• Accept a review invitation - The Reviewer will be able to click on the link to trigger the ‘Agree to
Review’ function. If a Reviewer ‘Agrees’ to do the review assignment in this manner, he or she will
be fully logged in and will be able to access the submission from the Main Menu.
• Decline a review invitation - The Reviewer will be able to click on the link to trigger the ‘Decline to
Review’ function. If a Reviewer ‘Declines’ the review assignment in this manner, he or she will
still be delivered to the ‘Decline to Review’ page, where he/she will be asked to state a reason for
declining the assignment and suggest other qualified Reviewers.
• View Reviewer version of the PDF – This link is available if the Editorial Office configures the
invitation e-mail to include it in the notification to the invited Reviewer. The Reviewer will be able
to click on the hyperlink to download the Reviewer version of the PDF.
• Update Unavailable Dates – This link is available if the Editorial Office includes in the e-mail
correspondence to Reviewers. Clicking the link automatically logs the Reviewer into the system
and brings him or her directly to the ‘Edit Unavailable Dates’ page.
Note: In order for the links in the e-mail to work, a user must NOT be logged into EM. Clicking on the link
will open the user’s default browser and will take him or her to the appropriate screen in EM.
Submitting a review
Once a Reviewer has agreed to a review assignment, he or she can access the manuscript by clicking on ‘Pending
Assignments’ on the Reviewer Main Menu as shown below.
There are several actions that can be performed from this menu:
Reviewers may search online databases, such as MEDLINE, to view articles that may be similar to a particular
manuscript by using Similar Articles in MEDLINE. Clicking this link displays a new browser window featuring the
Knowledge Finder® MEDLINE search engine. Other bibliographic search engines work in a similar fashion.
When ready to submit a review, the Reviewer clicks ‘Submit Recommendation’. This will bring him or her to the
‘Reviewer Recommendation and Comments’ screen.
Reviewers can choose a recommendation term (Accept, Reject, Revise etc.) via the pull-down menu for
‘Recommendation’.
On the ‘Submit Reviewer Recommendation and Comments’ page, the Reviewer Instructions and Review Form text
will be displayed in the comments box.
The Publication can choose which questions to apply to each Article Type/Reviewer Role combination, and indicate
whether each question is required or optional. If the submission being reviewed is a new, rather than revised
submission, the Publication may also request that an overall rating to the manuscript (1–100) be assigned.
Each Publication provides specific instructions for review of a submission – users can access these instructions by
clicking the button labeled ‘Reviewer Instructions’ at the top of the review fields.
Reviewers may enter comments to the Author and Editor in the fields provided. For convenience, Reviewers may
use a regular word processing program (e.g., Microsoft Word, WordPerfect) when typing a review. Reviewers
should then ‘copy’ and ‘paste’ the comments into the boxes provided. Click the ‘Save & Submit Later’ button to
save comments and continue working. Clicking the ‘Open in New Window’ button at the top right of the data
entry fields will open the field in a new browser window, providing the user with a larger view of the review field.
Clicking ‘Proof & Print’ will open a window containing all of the review information, as a way to make a printout
of the review.
The Reviewer must click ‘Submit Now’ to proceed. This will bring up a screen that allows the Reviewer to
proofread before sending it to the Publication Office. If further edits are needed, click ‘Edit Review’. If satisfied
with the review, click ‘Submit Review to Journal Office’.
Reviewer Attachments
If the Editorial Office has enabled this feature, Reviewers may upload files into the system as part of the ‘Submit
Recommendation’ process. Reviewers may want to upload annotated manuscripts, non-manuscript files such as
images or related materials.
Reviewers may provide a description before attaching any files and can attach single or multiple files to the review.
Each file is listed separately, and the ability to Download and Remove is available for each uploaded file.
• Care should be taken as some attachments may contain information revealing the originator's
identity, including information that appears in a file's 'Properties' (on Windows) and 'Get Info'
(on Macintosh).
• Authors and Reviewers are not sent these attachments via e-mail. The attachments made via the
Reviewers recommendation process can only be accessed via the EM site.
• Reviewer attachments, including edited versions of the attachment, can only be accessed by the
Reviewer who attached the file. This means that Reviewers cannot access other Reviewer’s
attachments.
• This function does not affect the PDF, nor does it add or edit files of the actual submission.
When review files have been uploaded, the Reviewer must click on the button labeled ‘Proceed with
Recommendation’. If changes need to be made, click on the button labeled ‘Back’. If no files have been attached,
the following warning will be displayed:
Click ‘Ok’ to proceed without adding a file or press ‘Cancel’ to go back and attach one.
The Reviewer will be returned to the main ‘Submit Recommendation’ screen. If all required information has been
completed, press the button labeled ‘Proceed’.
A summary screen will be displayed. This information should be checked for accuracy and edited if necessary. If
all of the information is correct, click on the button labeled ‘Submit Review to Journal Office’.
Once the review has been successfully submitted, the Reviewer will receive a screen thanking him or her for the
review and will see a button to return to the main menu.
When the Reviewer clicks on this link, the Author’s response to all of the reviewer comments will be listed: