Ijcsi 2021 - v10 n4 p3

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/355981308

Corrosion inhibitors. A review

Article  in  International Journal of Corrosion and Scale Inhibition · January 2021

CITATIONS READS
3 1,749

1 author:

Moafaq Kaseim Al-Ghezi


University of Technology - Iraq
17 PUBLICATIONS   52 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Calculate the Reflected Hourly Solar Radiation by Mirror Surfaces of Solar Concentrators Parabolic Trough View project

the corrosion View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Moafaq Kaseim Al-Ghezi on 07 November 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 54

Corrosion inhibitors. A review


A. Kadhim,1 A.A. Al-Amiery,2 * R. Alazawi,1 M.K.S. Al-Ghezi2
and R.H. Abass1
1
Laser and Optoelectronic Engineering Department, University of Technology, Baghdad,
10001 Iraq
2
Energy and renewable energies technology center, University of Technology, Baghdad,
10001 Iraq
*E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract
This review provides an outline of related literatures in which scientists and researchers used
different types and procedure of corrosion inhibitors to reduce corrosion that takes place in
various equipment made of alloys or metals. Different chemical inhibitors were used to reduce
the rate of corrosion in various alloys. The inhibition rates ranged between 30-80% in acidic
environments with different molar concentrations. The second part of this article, the laser was
used as a tool to inhibit the corrosion of some alloys and under various conditions without used
chemical inhibitors as an auxiliary agent. The effect of the laser pulses on the material leads to
an increase in its hardness and thus its corrosion resistance. We found that the rate of inhibition
reaches about 80%.

Keywords: corrosion, inhibitor, review.


Received: October 16, 2020. Published: January 17, 2021 doi: 10.17675/2305-6894-2021-10-1-3

Introduction
Corrosion is defined as the damage of metals and alloys through chemical or electrochemical
interaction with their surrounding environment [1]. In the classification of corrosion
reactions according to the nature of corrosive environments, they are divided into wet and
dry corrosion [2, 3]. Depending on the morphology of metal damage, the corrosion can be
classified into general corrosion, pitting corrosion, crevice corrosion, intergranular
corrosion, environmentally induced fracture, de-alloying; galvanic, and erosion-corrosion
[4, 5]. There are certain ways to protect the metal from corrosion such as coating, alloying,
cathodic protection, anodic protection and recently been using the laser for this purpose by
surface treatment of metal is considered as the way to improve the properties of metals like
roughness, hardness, the resistance of corrosion, etc. [6, 7]. Corrosion inhibitors are of
considerable practical importance, as they are extensively employed in reducing metallic
waste during production and In reducing the risk of material failure, both of which can lead
to the sudden closure of industrial processes, which in turn leads to additional costs. It is also
important to use corrosion inhibitors to prevent the dissolution of minerals and reduce acid
consumption [8, 9]. There are two types of corrosion reactions according to the nature of the
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 55

corrosive environments: wet and dry corrosion [10]. These types of corrosion can be
classified into general corrosion; pitting corrosion; crevice corrosion; Inter-granular
corrosion; environmentally induced fracture; de-alloying; galvanic, and erosion-corrosion;
this depends on the morphology of metal’s damage [11–13]. Several techniques, such as
coating, alloying, cathodic protection, anodic protection, and laser treatment are used to
protect metals from corrosion [14]. The use of laser technology in surface treatment of
materials represents the main areas in which looks set special features enjoyed by the laser
beam, which distinguish it from other energy sources and make it more than traditional
technologies are all (even modern ones) in this type of heat treatments [15–17]. The
increasing utilization of laser in material processing can be contributed to many unique
advantages of laser called, high productivity, automation worthiness, non-contact
processing, removal of finishing operation, decreased processing cost, improved product
quality, maximum material utilization, and minimum HAZ [18, 19]. The process of laser-
material interaction is considered as a very complex thermos-physical process under the
interaction between temperature, phase transformation, and stress-strain [20]. The use of
laser shock peening (LSP) is a new method used as a surface treatment; it is used to reduce
metal corrosion. LSP is defined as residual mechanical stress that is introduced as deep
pressure by generating shock waves by laser pulses with a high energy density to the target
surface [21]. There are methods to reduce metal wear by using modern alloys, thin films,
and coatings deposited on the surface of the metal and recently laser is used for this purpose
by surface treatment of metals and is a method for improving mental properties such as
roughness, hardness, wear resistance, etc. [22]. Herein, we investigate the classification,
synthesis, and applications of some synthesized inhibitors for the corrosion inhibition of
metals in corrosive solutions [23–42].

Classification of corrosion inhibitors


Organic Corrosion Inhibitors are an attractive area of research because of their usefulness
in various industries. The efficiency of the inhibitor depends on the stability of the formed
chelate, and the inhibitor molecule must have centers capable of forming bonds with the
metal surface by electron transport. Most organic inhibitors are absorbed onto the metal
surface by displacing water molecules on the surface and forming a pressurized barrier. The
availability of non-bonding electrons (a single pair) and p electrons in the inhibitor molecules
facilitate the transfer of the electron from the inhibitor to the metal. The efficiency of the
inhibitor depends on the stability of the chelate formed, so it mainly depends on the type and
nature of the alternatives present in the inhibitor molecule [43]. I.O. Ogunleye et al. in the
same year 2011 [44] investigated the effect of grapefruit juice in different concentrations on
the corrosion rate of mild steel in different acidic media (HCl and H2SO4) with the utilization
of the weight-loss method, this research used grapefruit juice in concentrations from 0% to
5% weight for each acidic solution and found the corrosion rates for HCl (0.694×10–7 to
0.378×10–7) g/cm2/sec and for H2SO4 (4.782×10–7 to 1.157×10–7) g/cm2/sec. It’s observed
that the addition of grapefruit juice reduced the corrosion rate of mild steel, the inhibitor
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 56

efficiency was measured at grapefruit juice concentration of 5% for HCl and H2SO4
respectively 94.6%, 75.8% that means grapefruit juice is the better corrosion inhibitor in HCl
acidic than H2SO4 acid. N.S. Patel et al. [45] in 2013 used corrosion inhibitor from leaves of
plants to decrease the corrosion rate of mild steel in 0.5 M of H2SO4 by using different
techniques (weight-loss method and electrochemical polarization) it was showed the extract
of leaves plants are excellent corrosion inhibitors. The scanning electron microscope shows
the surface of mild steel has become more resistant to corrosion as a result of a protective
layer that is formed on the surface due to the adsorption of active molecules. A. Kadhim
examined the anti-corrosion activity of mild steel corrosion in hydrochloric acid (1 M) media
caused by the Schiff base 3-[(5-phenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)imino]-2-oxoindoline. Weight-
loss measurements and scanning electron microscopy were performed during the
investigation. The measurements showed that the inhibition efficiency of the chemical
compound increased with its increasing concentration. This inhibitor functioned through
adsorption following the Langmuir isotherm and the electronic properties obtained through
the Austin Model 1. The semi-empirical method was found to be correlated with the
inhibitor’s experimental efficiency by the nonlinear regression method. The organic
compound was synthesized effectively through a reaction between indoline-2,3-dione and
5-amino-2-phenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol [46]. Al-Amery and Kadihum have invented a coating
composition for inhibiting corrosion named 1,5-dimethyl-4-((2-methyl benzylidene)amino)-
2-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-3(2H)-one (Figure 1), on mild steel metal surface. This inhibitor was
synthesized with an excellent yield by refluxing ο-tolualdehyde, 4-aminoantipyrine, and a
polar solvent. This new inhibitor can reduce the corrosion rate on metal surfaces [47].
Figure 2 shows the corrosion rate per year as a function of the time with organic inhibitor.

Figure 1. 1,5-Dimethyl-4-((2-methylbenzylidene)amino)-2-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-3(2H)-one.
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 57

250 0.5 mM

200 0.25
mM
CR (mpy)
150 0.15
mM
100

50

0
1 2 3 4 5 10
Time (hours)

Figure 2. Corrosion rate per year as a function of time period with organic inhibitor for
different acid molarity.

The laser is characterized by providing large amounts of energy in the confined areas
of the material to reach the required reaction, and this energy will be absorbed by a nearby
metal surface and the surface chemistry will be treated [48]. The laser surface processing
can be classified according to the change in surface material synthesis into two kinds:
First thermal process: this process doesn’t cause any change in the composition of
material surface like laser cutting, welding, tempering, annealing, melting, and
transformation hardening. And the second kind is the thermo-chemical process: in this
process, the metal will have a change in metallic structure by adding another material so the
surface composition changes, like laser cladding, alloying. Furthermore, the advantages of
these surface treatments include flexibility and the possibility of treating small areas, leaving
the other parts unaffected [49]. Laser shock peening represents a modern method used in
surface treatment can be defined as a mechanical process based on the introduction of
residual pressure of deep pressure by shock waves that are generated by the disposal of laser
pulses with a high energy density on the surface target [50, 51]. In 2004, Ocana et al.
presented a summary providing various experimental results obtained from the latest LSP
experiments conducted by the authors along with the conclusions. They rated LSP as a
profitable way to extend the life of fatigue in critical components. In particular, an initial
display of the frequency power multiplier was obtained [52]. The laser shock peening
technique (Figure 3) is a good technique to modify the surface properties and improve the
corrosion resistance thus the corrosion rate decreased from 7.7210 mm/y before LSP
treatment to 1.0716 mm/y after LSP treatment at the optimum thickness of the confining
layer (4 mm). Q-switching Nd:YAG laser is an efficient corrosion inhibitor for an St-37 alloy
on immersion in 1 M HCl, the maximum inhibitor efficiency is 85.59%. Polarization curve
results show that shifting occurs in the potential to more positive region after applying LSP,
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 58

while the corrosion current is reduced from 958.02 μA/cm2 to 138.17 μA/cm2 after using
Nd:Yag laser as a corrosion inhibitor [53].

Figure 3. Laser shock peening technique.

Nd:YAG lasers to the remaining residual stresses are stimulated in a highly deformed
material such as aluminum. Although there are reasonable doubts about their ability to cause
these tensions overextended depths or in less deformed materials (i.e. stainless steel).
Janez Grum et al. [54] investigated improving corrosion resistance by LSP for
aluminum alloys (AlMgSiPb and AlSi1MgMn) in the same year (2010). Nd:YAG laser used
(1064 nm) with a pulse duration of 10ns, pulse repetition rate of 10 Hz, and the pulse density
was changed. From the polarization tests after increasing the laser pulse density it has been
found the potential increased with the increasing of laser pulse density, for AlSi1MgMn the
increase occurred in the pitting potential equal to 120 mV and for AlMgSiPb equal to
267 mV so bigger corrosion resistance was obtained with increasing laser pulse density. In
2012, Subhasisa Nath [55] studied laser surface alloying of aluminum with WC+CO+NiCr
for improved wear resistance. Laser surface alloying of aluminum with WC+CO+NiCr (in
the ratio of 70:15:15) has been conducted using a 5 kW continuous wave (CW) Nd:YAG
laser (at a beam diameter of 0.003 m). The output power used was ranging from 3 to 3.5 kW
and 0.012 m/s to 0.04 m/s scan speed by simultaneous feeding of precursor powder (at a
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 59

flow rate of 1×10−5 kg/s) and using He shroud at a gas flow rate of 3×10−6 m3/s. Laser surface
alloying leads to the development of fine-grained aluminum with the dispersion of WC,
W2C, Al4C3, Al9CO2, Al3Ni, Cr23C6, and CO6W6C. Figure 4 represents the effect of laser
shock on sample surface before and after treatment.

Figure 4. The microstructures of metal’s surface before laser treatment and right after laser
treatment.

Chemical compounds Added in small quantities to reduce the wear rate. The presence
of these compounds delays the corrosion process and keeps its rate to a minimum, thus
preventing economic losses caused by mineral corrosion. Chemicals that can act as corrosion
inhibitors may be inorganic or organic.
M. Sivaraju and K. Kannan, 2010 [44] studied the effect of Acalypha Indica L.
alcoholic extract (AIAE) as inhibitor material on mild steel that corrodes in 1 N phosphoric
acid by two techniques mass loss and polarization techniques at different temperatures. They
found when increasing the concentration of plant extract, the inhibition efficiency increased,
also this study showed direct proportionality between the corrosion rate and temperature and
reverse proportionality between the concentration of inhibitor and corrosion rate. At 303 K
in 1 N phosphoric acid at 5 mg of the inhibitor, the maximum inhibition efficiency from
mass loss studies was equal to 95.21% and from polarization measurement it was equal to
90.38%. In 2011 Shylesha B.S. et al. [56] used 2-methyl-3-aniline as a corrosion inhibitor
for mild steel in different corrosive media (1 M HCl and 0.5 M H2SO4) by using mass loss
and electrochemical studies. The concentration of inhibitor was changed (0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.10,
0.15, 0.20 M) then the inhibition efficiencies were calculated. The maximum IE was
obtained with higher concentration from mass loss measurements, IE=81.7% in H2SO4 and
IE=84.2% in HCl, and from polarization studies IE=81.9% in H2SO4 and IE=82.1% in HCl.
An increase in concentrations led to an increase in inhibition efficiency.
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 60

Makanjuola Oki et al. [57] in 2011 used tannin, tannin:H3PO4, and H3PO4 as inhibitor
materials for mild steel in hydrochloric acid with the use of weight loss measurements that
indicated the efficiency of inhibitor was 72% for tannin at a maximum concentration of
140 ppm and with the same concentration of tannin:H3PO4 in ratio 1:1 the inhibition
efficiency was 61%, while the efficiency of H3PO4 was 55%. At inhibitor concentrations of
140 ppm for 6 hour exposure in 1 M HCl solution, the corrosion rate for tannin was
2 mA/cm2, 2.4 mA/cm2 for tannin/H3PO4, H3PO4-inhibited 2.6 mA/cm2, and 6 mA/cm2 for
uninhibited sample
Sutiana Junaedi et al. [58] used 1,5-dimethy1-4-(2-methylbenzylidene)amino-2-
phenyl-1H-pyrazol-3(2H)-one (DMPO) with different concentrations (0 to 0.5×10–3 M) to
protect mild steel that was immersed in 1 M HCl and the impacting of DMPO into corrosion,
from polarization measurement at a higher value of inhibitor concentration, it was found the
maximum was IE=87.7% with icorr =39.6 μA cm–2 and Ecorr =–479 mV/sec.
In 2014 S.I. Durowaye et al. [69] studied the effect of Methyl red (2,4-dimethylamino-
2´-carboxylazobenzene) with different concentrations (1,2,3,4,5 and 6%)as an inhibitor on
the corrosion rate of mild steel in 1 M H2SO4. The results showed a decrease in corrosion
rate as the concentration of the organic compound increased, with the maximum IE=87.3%
and with the lowest CR=0.352 mpy. In 2015, AL-Amery, Kadhim, et al. [60] used the power
of creatinine as an inhibitor. Metals in 1 M corrosive acid solution (hydrochloric acid) were
investigated utilizing a weight loss technique. Results demonstrated that the inhibition
occurs through adsorption of the creatinine molecules on the surface of the metal and the
efficiencies were improved with an increment in creatinine concentration and diminished at
higher temperature degrees. SEM was done for the metal surface to examine it. The highest
occupied molecular orbital energy, lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy, and dipole
moment were theoretically calculated utilizing Density Function theory.
Anti-corrosion coatings are generally used to prevent average wear and increase the
longevity of mild steel. A wide range of organic adsorption inhibitors is currently applied in
the area of expensive corrosion. Pairs of electrons and negative ions are transferred from the
inhibitors to the metal orbitals d, which leads to the formation of coordination complexes
with a specific geometry, such as planar, quadrilateral, or octahedral [61]. Thus, the barrier
particles improve the mild steel’s resistance to corrosive solutions by absorbing it onto the
metal surface and forming a barrier that prevents the active sites of mild steel. Adsorption
on slight steel is affected by the nature of mild steel, the type of electrolyte, and the molecular
structure of the inhibitor [62].

Nanoparticles coating
The use of nano-coatings is one of the most effective methods for preventing and postponing
corrosion. Nano-coatings have a higher thermal expansion coefficient, higher hardness and
toughness, and more resistance to corrosion, abrasion, and erosion. The effect of TiO2 nano-
particle coating on the construction of corrosion-resistant blades of centrifugal pumps. Thin
layers of titanium dioxide nano-particles were created in two separate steps on GG25 gray
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 61

cast iron samples with specific dimensions and characteristics using the sol-gel process and
immersion method. After each step, heat treatment was performed to stabilize the nano-
coating. The thickness of applied coatings was measured by scanning electron microscopy
(SEM). To measure the corrosion rate, the samples were exposed to petrochemical
wastewater. The corrosion rate was measured by the atomic absorption spectrometry
method. The experiments were carried out in a factorial arrangement in a completely
randomized design with three temperature levels of 40, 50, and 60°C and four thicknesses.
The results showed that the coating of titanium dioxide nano-particles increased the
corrosion resistance of GG25 gray cast iron. With an increase in temperature from 40 to
60°C, the corrosion rate of all samples increased by 46.6%. Coated samples with thicknesses
of 440–550, 840–970, and 1030–1330 nm reduced the corrosion rates by 39.1%, 67.8% and
73.6%, respectively [63].
In some circumstances, the nano-coating may not act as protective surfaces. Nano
coating is an effective physical barrier in high-temperature applications, as its high grain
density provides fast diffusion paths for passive ions and better adhesion to the protective
oxide layer on the substrate surface [64]. However, the higher boundary portion of the grain
provides more anode locations, making the surface more vulnerable to corrosion attack.
Moreover, the nano-coating forms a defensive structure by including them in vacant
positions, dislocation, and grain- interpolation limits. These features have the advantage of
forming a more effective passivation layer, as the inert ions spread will be faster. On the
other hand, the agglomeration of these nanomaterials may occur due to the accelerated
proliferation of aggressive ions, causing non-uniform surfaces. It increases the ability to form
active sites, thereby reducing wear resistance as shown in Figure 5 [65].

Figure 5. SEM graphs of corrosion samples (left: without nanocoating) & with nanocoating.

Such a discrepancy urges the need to study the corrosion behavior of each nanoparticle,
taking into account all the surrounding conditions involved [66].
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 62

Zinc oxide nanopowder was studied as an agent to achieve anti-corrosion properties of


a coating. The research project discusses the corrosion behavior of epoxy zinc oxide in
various media by measuring the wear rate. Mild carbon steel was used as a substrate for
epoxy and zinc oxide coating. The corrosion behavior of mild steel has been examined in
various modes, freshwater, NaCl solution, HCl solution, and NaOH solution. The immersion
test was done and studied for 60 days, with daily and weekly weight and immersion [67].

Conclusions
All types of inhibitors which were used lead to reduced the rate of corrosion, but in varying
degrees. When using the organic compound, we observed an improvement in corrosion
resistance of up to 80 percent. Laser treatment leads to a reduction in the corrosion rate by a
lot of times after applying laser shock processing than without laser treatment. When using
a nanocoating layer the corrosion rate was reduced more than upon laser treatment and an
organic compound.
References
1. P. Maaß, Corrosion And Corrosion Protection, Wiley-Vch Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA,
2011.
2. G.V. Redkina, A.S. Sergienko and Yu.I. Kuznetsov, Hydrophobic and anticorrosion
properties of thin phosphonate–siloxane films formed on a laser textured zinc surface,
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2020, 9, no. 4, 1550–1563. doi: 10.17675/2305-6894-2020-
9-4-23
3. A.I. Biryukov, O.A. Kozaderov, R.G. Galin, D.A. Zakharyevich and V.E. Zhivulin,
Details of the mechanism of dissolution of iron–zinc coatings based on the δ-phase in
acidic media, Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2020, 9, no. 4, 1477–1489. doi:
10.17675/2305-6894-2020-9-4-18
4. Yu.I. Kuznetsov, Triazoles as a class of multifunctional corrosion inhibitors. Review.
Part II. 1,2,3-Benzotriazole and its derivatives. Iron and steels, Int. J. Corros. Scale
Inhib., 2020, 9, no. 3, 780–811. doi: 10.17675/2305-6894-2020-9-3-1
5. A. Kadihum, Improvement the fatigue resistance and increase its life of specimens of
naval brass alloy using laser shock wave processing, J. Nanosci. Technol., 2016, 2, no. 1,
69–726.
6. A. Kadhim, R.S. Jawad, N.H. Numan and R.J. Al-Azawi, Determination the wear rate
by using XRF technique for Kovar alloy under lubricated condition, Int. J. Comput. Appl.
Sci. (IJOCAAS), 2017, 2, no. 1, 1–5.
7. M. Hanoon, D.S. Zinad, A.M. Resen and A.A. Al-Amiery, Gravimetrical and surface
morphology studies of corrosion inhibition effects of a 4-aminoantipyrine derivative on
mild steel in a corrosive solution, Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2020, 9, no. 3, 953–966.
doi: 10.17675/2305-6894-2020-9-3-10
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 63

8. A.A. Al-Amiery, A.A.H. Kadhum, A.B. Mohamad, A.Y. Musa and C.J. Li,
Electrochemical study on newly synthesized chlorocurcumin as an inhibitor for mild
steel corrosion in hydrochloric acid, Materials, 2013, 6, no. 12, 5466–5477. doi:
10.3390/ma6125466
9. A.A. Al-Amiery, A.A.H. Kadhum, A.B. Mohamad and S. Junaedi, A novel
hydrazinecarbothioamide as a potential corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in HCl,
Materials, 2013, 6, no. 4, 1420–1431. doi: 10.3390/ma6041420
10. H. Herbert, H. Uhlig and R. Revie, Corrosion and Corrosion Control: An Introduction
to Corrosion Science And Engineering, 4th edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
11. A. Kadihum and S.J. Raid, Spectral study of some pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, Eng.
Techol. J., 2015, 33, no. 2, 172–177.
12. M. Hashim, A. Kadhim and R.J. Al Azawi, Effect of laser Peening on the Microhardness
and Roughness of Al-7277 alloy, Eng. Techol. J., 2019, 37, no. 10A, 404–407.
13. M. Hashim, R. Al-Azawi and A. Kadhim, The Q-switched Nd:YAG laser shock
processing effects on mechanical properties of C86400 Cu-Zn alloy, Iraqi J. Phys. (IJP),
2019, 17, no. 42, 136–140.
14. A. Kadhim, S.M. Kadhim and H. Abdul Elah, Enhancement of the corrosion resistance
for 6009 aluminum alloy by laser treatment, Kufa J. Eng., 2018, 9, no. 2, 202–214.
15. J.R. Davies, Surface Engineering for Corrosion and Wear Resistance, ASM
International, 2001.
16. H. Ruaa, A. Azhar, M. Haleem, M.K. Hamid, A. Kadhim and R.S. Jawad, Antimicrobial
Activity of TiO2 NPs against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus
ATCC 25923, Int. J. Comp. Appl. Sci. (IJOCAAS), 2017, 2, no. 1, 2399–4509.
17. K. Emregu and E.D. Atakol, The application of some polydentate Schiff base
compounds containing aminic nitrogens as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in acidic
media, Corros. Sci., 2006, 48, 3243–3260.
18. A. Kadhim, S.M. Kadhim and H.A. Abduljalil, A study of LSP technique effect on the
wear resistance for aluminum and copper alloy, 4th Electronic and Green Materials
International Conference 2018 , AIP Publishing.
19. E.V. Kharanzhevskiy, S.M. Reshetnikov, A.V. Efimov, F.Z. Gil’mutdinov and
M.D. Krivilev, Application of some inhibitors for improving the corrosion resistance of
ceramic coatings deposited on non-alloy steel by short-pulse laser treatment, Int. J.
Corros. Scale Inhib., 2020, 9, no. 1, 44–55. doi: 10.17675/2305-6894-2020-9-1-3
20. S.M. Reshetnikov, T.A. Pisareva, E.V. Kharanzhevsky, F.Z. Gil’mutdinov and
E.M. Borisova, Effect of laser treatment of unalloyed steel on the efficiency of
benzotriazole as a corrosion inhibitor in a neutral medium, Int. J. Corros. Scale
Inhib., 2020, 9, no. 3, 1113–1120. doi: 10.17675/2305-6894-2020-9-3-21
21. A.Y. El-Etre, Inhibition of acid corrosion of carbon steel using aqueous extract of olive
leaves, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2007, 314, 578–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.05.077
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 64

22. D.E. Arthur and S.E. Abechi, Corrosion inhibition studies of mild steel using Acalypha
chamaedrifolia leaves extract in hydrochloric acid medium, SN Appl. Sci., 2019, 1, no. 9,
1089. doi: 10.1007/s42452-019-1138-4
23. A.A. Al-Amiery and L.M. Shaker, Corrosion inhibition of mild steel using novel
pyridine derivative in 1 M hydrochloric acid, Koroze Ochr. Mater., 2020, 64, no. 2, 59–
64. 10.2478/kom-2020-0009
24. A.J. Braihi, A.J. Jawad, A.A. Kadhum, H.S. Aljibori and A.A. Al-Amiery, Chemical
resistance of NR/SBR rubber blends for surfaces corrosion protection of metallic tanks
in petrochemical industries, Koroze Ochr. Mater., 2020, 64, no. 2, 65–71. doi:
10.2478/kom-2020-0010
25. A.A.H. Kadhum, A.B. Mohamad, L.A. Hammed, A.A. Al-Amiery, N.H. San and
A.Y. Musa, Inhibition of mild steel corrosion in hydrochloric acid solution by new
coumarin, Materials, 2014, 7, no. 6, 4335–4348. doi: 10.3390/ma7064335
26. A.A. Al-Amiery, A.A.H. Kadhum, A. Kadihum, A.B. Mohamad, C.K. How and
S. Junaedi, Inhibition of mild steel corrosion in sulfuric acid solution by new Schiff base,
Materials, 2014, 7, no. 2, 787–804. doi: 10.3390/ma7020787
27. A.A. Al-Amiery, A.A.H. Kadhum, A.H.M. Alobaidy, A.B. Mohamad and P.S. Hoon,
Novel corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in HCl, Materials, 2014, 7, no. 2, 662–672. doi:
10.3390/ma7020662
28. S.B. Al-Baghdadi, F.G. Hashim, A.Q. Salam, T.K. Abed, T.S. Gaaz, A.A. Al-Amiery,
A.A.H. Kadhum, K.S. Reda and W.K. Ahmed, Synthesis and corrosion inhibition
application of NATN on mild steel surface in acidic media complemented with DFT
studies, Results Phys., 2018, 8, 1178–1184. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.02.007
29. H.J. Habeeb, H.M. Luaibi, R.M. Dakhil, A.A.H. Kadhum, A.A. Al-Amiery and
T.S. Gaaz, Development of new corrosion inhibitor tested on mild steel supported by
electrochemical study, Results Phys., 2018, 8, 1260–1267. doi:
10.1016/j.rinp.2018.02.015
30. K.F. Al-Azawi, I.M. Mohammed, S.B. Al-Baghdadi, T.A. Salman, H.A. Issa, A.A. Al-
Amiery, T.S. Gaaz and A.A.H. Kadhum, Experimental and quantum chemical
simulations on the corrosion inhibition of mild steel by 3-((5-(3,5-dinitrophenyl)-1,3,4-
thiadiazol-2-yl)imino)indolin-2-one, Results Phys., 2018, 9, 278–283. doi:
10.1016/j.rinp.2018.02.055
31. A.B. Mohamad, A.A.H. Kadhum, A.A. Al-Amiery, L.C. Ying and A.Y. Musa,
Synergistic of a coumarin derivative with potassium iodide on the corrosion inhibition
of aluminum alloy in 1.0 M H2SO4, Met. Mater. Int., 2014, 20, 459–467. doi:
10.1007/s12540-014-3008-3
32. H.R. Obayes, G.H. Alwan, A.H.MJ. Alobaidy, A.A. Al-Amiery, A.A.H. Kadhum and
A.B. Mohamad, Quantum chemical assessment of benzimidazole derivatives as
corrosion inhibitors, Chem. Cent. J., 2014, 8, no. 21, 1–8. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-8-
21
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 65

33. A.A. Al-Amiery, Y.K. Al-Majedy, A.A.H. Kadhum and A.B. Mohamad, New coumarin
derivative as an eco-friendly inhibitor of corrosion of mild steel in acid medium,
Molecules, 2015, 20, no. 1, 366–383. doi: 10.3390/molecules20010366
34. E. Yousif, Y.F. Win, A.H. Al-Hamadani, A. Al-Amiery, A.A.H. Kadhum and
A.B. Mohamad, Furosemide as an environmental-friendly inhibitor of corrosion of zinc
metal in acid medium: Experimental and theoretical studies, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.,
2015, 10, 1708–1718.
35. S.B. Al-Baghdadi, F.T.M. Noori, W.K. Ahmed and A.A. Al-Amiery, Thiadiazole as a
potential corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in 1 M HCl, J. Adv. Electrochem., 2016, 2,
67–69.
36. A.A. Al-Amiery, F.A.B. Kassim, A.A.H. Kadhum and A.B. Mohamad, Synthesis and
characterization of a novel eco-friendly corrosion inhibition for mild steel in 1 M
hydrochloric acid, Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, 19890. doi: 10.1038/srep19890
37. A. Kadhim, A.K. Al-Okbi, D.M. Jamil, A. Qussay, A.A. Al-Amiery, T.S. Gaas,
A.A.H. Kadhum, A.B. Mohamad and M.H. Nassir, Experimental and theoretical studies
of benzoxazines corrosion inhibitors, Results Phys., 2017, 7, 4013–4019. doi:
10.1016/j.rinp.2017.10.027
38. H.R. Obayes, A.A. Al-Amiery, G.H. Alwan, T.A. Abdullah, A.A.H. Kadhum and
A.B. Mohamad, Sulphonamides as corrosion inhibitor: experimental and DFT studies,
J. Mol. Struct., 2017, 1138, 27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.02.100
39. D.M. Jamil, A.K. Al-Okbi, S.B. Al-Baghdadi, A.A. Al-Amiery, A. Kadhim and
T.S. Gaaz, Experimental and theoretical studies of Schiff bases as corrosion inhibitors,
Chem. Cent. J., 2018, 12, no. 7, 1–7. doi: 10.1186/s13065-018-0376-7
40. M.H.O. Ahmed, A.A. Al-Amiery, Y.K. Al-Majedy, A.A.H. Kadhum, A.B. Mohamad
and T.S. Gaaz, Synthesis and characterization of a novel organic corrosion inhibitor for
mild steel in 1 M hydrochloric acid, Results Phys., 2018, 8, 728–733. doi:
10.1016/j.rinp.2017.12.039
41. T.A. Salman, D.S. Zinad, S.H. Jaber, M. Shayaa, A. Mahal, M.S. Takriff and A.A. Al-
Amiery, Effect of 1,3,4 thiadiazole scafold on the corrosion inhibition of mild steel in
acidic medium: an experimental and computational study, J. Bio Tribo-Corros., 2019, 5,
48, 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s40735-019-0243-7
42. D. Mahmood, A.K. Al-Okbi, M.M. Hanon, K.S. Rida, A.F. Alkaim, A.A. Al-Amiery,
A. Kadhum and A.A.H. Kadhum, Carbethoxythiazole corrosion inhibitor: as an
experimentally model and DFT theory, J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 2018, 13, 3952–3959. doi:
10.3923/jeasci.2018.3952.3959
43. A. Kadhim, R.S. Jawad, N.H. Numan and R.J. Al-Azawi, Determination the wear rate
by using XRF technique for Kovar alloy under lubricated condition, Int. J. Comp. Appl.
Sci. (IJOCAAS), 2017, 2, 93–102.
44. I. Ogunleye, G. Adeyemi and A. Oyegoke, Effect of grape fruit juice on the corrosion
behaviour of mild steel in acidic medium, Am. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 2011, 2, 611–615.
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 66

45. N.S. Patel, S. Jauhariand, G.N. Mehta, S.S. Al-Deyab, I.Warad and B. Hammouti, Mild
Steel Corrosion Inhibition by Various Plant Extracts in 0.5 M Sulphuric acid, Int. J.
Electrochem. Sci., 2013, 8, 2635–2655.
46. A. Kadhim, Experimental investigation for corrosion inhibition of mild steel in
hydrochloric acid bath by 3-[(5-phenyl-1,3,-thiadiazol-2-yl)imino]-2-oxoindoline, J.
Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron., 2018, 29, 4683–4688. doi: 10.1007/s10854-017-8420-2
47. A. Al-Amiery and A. Kadihum, The Using of ο-Tolualdehyde as Corrosion Inhibitor,
Iraqi patent No. 4991, C07C45/72, 2017.
48. S. Brown and C.B. Arnold, Fundamentals of Laser Material Interaction And Application
To Multiscale Surface Modification, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.
49. Y. Xiong, T. He, Z. Guo, H. He, F. Ren and A. Volinsky, Effects Of Laser Shock
Processing On Surface Microstructure And Mechanical Properties Of Ultrafine- Grained
High Carbon Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, 570, 82–86.
50. S. Shivalingappa, B. Kubsad, B. Siddeswarappa and R. Sridhar, Effect Of Shock Waves
on Wear Behavior of Few Metallic Materials, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. (IJEST), 2012,
4, 2425–2431.
51. A. Kadhim, E.T. Salim, S.M. Fayadh, A.A. Al-Amiery, A.A.H. Kadhum and
A. Mohamad, Effect of Multipath Laser Shock Processing on Microhardness, Surface
Roughness And Wear Resistance of 2024-T3 Al Alloy, Sci. World J., 2014, 2014, 1–6.
doi: 10.1155/2014/490951
52. J. Ocaña, C. Molpeceres, J. Porro, G. Gómez and M. Morales, Experimental assessment
of the influence of irradiation parameters on surface deformation and residual stresses in
laser shock processed metallic alloys, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2004, 238, 501–505.
53. W.M. Shakier, A. Kadhim and A.Z. Mohammed, Corrosion inhibitor for St-37 Alloy by
Laser Shoch Peenine, J. Adv. Electrochem., 2016, 2, 56–59.
54. U. Trdan, J. Ocaña and J. Grum, Surface Modification of Aluminium Alloys with Laser
Shock Processing, J. Mech. Eng., 2011, 57, 385–393.
55. S. Nath, S. Pityana and J.D. Majumdar, Laser surface alloying of aluminium with WC+
Co+ NiCr for improved wear resistance, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2012, 206, 3333–3341.
56. B.S. Shylesha, T.V. Venkatesha and B.M. Praveen, Corrosion Inhibition Studies of Mild
Steel by New Inhibitor in Different Corrosive Medium, Res. J. Chem. Sci., 2011, 7, 46–
50.
57. M. Oki, E. Charles, C. Alaka and T. Oki, Corrosion Inhibition of Mild Steel in
Hydrochloric Acid by Tannins from Rhizophora Racemosa, Mater. Sci. Appl., 2011, 2,
592–595.
58. S. Junaedi, A. Al-Amiery, A. Kadihum, A.H. Kadhum and A. Mohamad, Inhibition
Effects of a Synthesized Novel 4-Aminoantipyrine Derivative on the Corrosion of Mild
Steel in Hydrochloric Acid Solution together with Quantum Chemical Studies. Int. J.
Mol. Sci., 2013, 14, 11915–11928. doi: 10.3390/ijms140611915
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2021, 10, no. 1, 54–67 67

59. S.I. Durowaye, V.O. Durowaye and B.M. Begusa, Corrosion Inhibition of Mild Steel in
Acidic Medium by Methyl Red (2,4-Dimethylamino-2´-carboxylazobenzene), Int. J.
Eng. Technol., 2014, 4, 469–475.
60. A. Alobaidy, A. Kadhum, S. Al-Baghdadi, A. Al-Amiery, A. Kadhum, E. Yousif et al.,
Eco-friendly corrosion inhibitor: experimental studies on the corrosion inhibition
performance of creatinine for mild steel in HCl complemented with quantum chemical
calculations, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 2015, 10, 3961–3972.
61. S. Junaedi, A.A.H. Kadhum, A. Al-Amiery, A.B. Mohamad and M.S. Takriff, Synthesis
and characterization of novel corrosion inhibitor derived from oleic acid: 2-Amino-5-
Oleyl 1,3,4-Thiadiazol (AOT), Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 2012, 7, 3543–3554.
62. S.R. Paital, A. Bhattacharya, M. Moncayo, Y.H. Ho, K. Mahdak, S. Nag et al.,
Improved corrosion and wear resistance of Mg alloys via laser surface modification of
Al on AZ31B, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2012, 206, 2308–2315.
63. S. Kouhi, B. Ghamari and R. Yeganeh, The Effect of NanoParticle Coating on
Anticorrosion Performance of Centrifugal Pump Blades, Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng.,
2018, 12, no. 2, 117–122.
64. A.Y.I. Rubaye, K.S. Rida, A.Q. Salam and A. Al-Amiery, Acetamidocoumarin as a
based eco-friendly corrosion inhibitor, Int. J. ChemTech Res., 2016, 9, 39–47.
65. H.J. Habeeb, H.M. Luaibi, T.A. Abdullah, R.M. Dakhil, A.A.H. Kadhum and A.A. Al-
Amiery, Case study on thermal impact of novel corrosion inhibitor on mild steel, Case
Stud. Therm. Eng., 2018, 12, 64–68. doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2018.03.005
66. S.S. Al-Taweel, K.W.S. Al-Janabi, H.M. Luaibi, A.A. Al-Amiery and T.S. Gaaz,
Evaluation and characterization of the symbiotic effect of benzylidene derivative with
titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the inhibition of the chemical corrosion of mild steel,
Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhib., 2019, 8, no. 4, 1149–1169. doi: 10.17675/2305-6894-2019-
8-4-21
67. J.N. Hasnidawani and H.N. Azlina, ZnO Nanoparticles for Anti-Corrosion Nanocoating
of Carbon Steel, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2017, 894, 76–80.



View publication stats

You might also like