Iso14064 1 2018
Iso14064 1 2018
Iso14064 1 2018
STANDARD 14064-1
Second edition
2018-12
Greenhouse gases —
Part 1:
Specification with guidance at the
organization level for quantification
and reporting of greenhouse gas
emissions and removals
Gaz à effet de serre —
Partie 1: Spécifications et lignes directrices, au niveau des organismes,
pour la quantification et la déclaration des émissions et des
suppressions des gaz à effet de serre
Reference number
ISO 14064-1:2018(E)
© ISO 2018
ISO 14064-1:2018(E)
Contents Page
Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................... v
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... vi
1 Scope .....................................................................................................................................................................1
2 Normative references ......................................................................................................................... 1
3 Terms and definitions ........................................................................................................................ 1
3.1 Terms relating to greenhouse gases............................................................................................................ 1
3.2 Terms relating to the GHG inventory process ......................................................................... 3
3.3 Terms relating to biogenic material and land use ................................................................................. 5
3.4 Terms relating to organizations, interested parties and verification ................................... 5
4 Principles .............................................................................................................................................. 7
4.1 General ....................................................................................................................................... 7
4.2 Relevance................................................................................................................................................................ 7
4.3 Completeness ........................................................................................................................................................ 7
4.4 Consistency ................................................................................................................................ 7
4.5 Accuracy ..................................................................................................................................... 7
4.6 Transparency ............................................................................................................................. 7
5 GHG inventory boundaries ................................................................................................................ 7
5.1 Organizational boundaries .............................................................................................................................. 7
5.2 Reporting boundaries........................................................................................................................................ 8
5.2.1 Establishing reporting boundaries ............................................................................................. 8
5.2.2 Direct GHG emissions and removals ......................................................................... 8
5.2.3 Indirect GHG emissions .............................................................................................. 8
5.2.4 GHG inventory categories........................................................................................... 8
6 Quantification of GHG emissions and removals ............................................................................ 9
6.1 Identification of GHG sources and sinks .................................................................................. 9
6.2 Selection of quantification approach ....................................................................................... 9
6.2.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 9
6.2.2 Data selection and collection used for quantification .............................................. 9
6.2.3 Selection or development of GHG quantification model ........................................ 10
6.3 Calculation of GHG emissions and removals ......................................................................... 10
6.4 Base-year GHG inventory........................................................................................................ 10
6.4.1 Selection and establishment of base year ............................................................... 10
6.4.2 Review of base-year GHG inventory ........................................................................ 11
7 Mitigation activities .......................................................................................................................... 11
7.1 GHG emission reduction and removal enhancement initiatives ......................................... 11
7.2 GHG emission reduction or removal enhancement projects ............................................... 12
7.3 GHG emission reduction or removal enhancement targets ................................................. 12
8 GHG inventory quality management ............................................................................................. 12
8.1 GHG information management............................................................................................... 12
8.2 Document retention and record keeping .............................................................................. 13
8.3 Assessing uncertainty ............................................................................................................. 13
9 GHG reporting .................................................................................................................................... 14
9.1 General ..................................................................................................................................... 14
9.2 Planning the GHG report ......................................................................................................... 14
9.3 GHG report content ................................................................................................................. 14
9.3.1 Required information ............................................................................................... 14
9.3.2 Recommended information........................................................................................................ 15
9.3.3 Optional information and associated requirements .............................................. 16
10 Organization’s role in verification activities................................................................................ 16
Annex A (informative) Process to consolidate data ................................................................................. 17
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the
World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see www.iso
.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 207, Environmental management,
Subcommittee SC 7, Greenhouse gas management and related activities.
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 14064-1:2006), which has been
technically revised.
The main changes compared to the previous edition are as follows.
— A new approach has been introduced to reporting boundaries, facilitating the inclusion and
expansion of indirect emissions. This change is a response to a growing number of organizations
that are recognizing the importance and significance of indirect emissions and are developing GHG
inventories that include more types of indirect emissions across the value chain.
— The GHG emissions category “other indirect GHG emissions” has been renamed “indirect GHG
emissions.” Requirements and guidance have been provided for classification of indirect GHG
emissions into five specific categories. “Operational boundaries” has been renamed “reporting
boundaries” for clarification and simplicity.
— New requirements and guidance for GHG quantification and reporting of specific items, such as
the treatment of biogenic carbon and GHG emissions related to electricity, have been added for
clarification.
A list of all parts in the ISO 14064 series can be found on the ISO website.
This document is the generic standard for the quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emission
and removals at an organizational level.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.
Introduction
0.1 Background
Climate change arising from anthropogenic activity has been identified as one of the greatest challenges
facing the world and will continue to affect business and citizens over future decades.
Climate change has implications for both human and natural systems and could lead to significant
impacts on resource availability, economic activity and human wellbeing. In response, international,
regional, national and local initiatives are being developed and implemented by public and private
sectors to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations in the Earth’s atmosphere, as well as to
facilitate adaptation to climate change.
There is a need for an effective and progressive response to the urgent threat of climate change
on the basis of the best available scientific knowledge. ISO produces documents that support the
transformation of scientific knowledge into tools that will help address climate change.
GHG initiatives on mitigation rely on the quantification, monitoring, reporting and verification of GHG
emissions and/or removals.
The ISO 14060 family provides clarity and consistency for quantifying, monitoring, reporting and
validating or verifying GHG emissions and removals to support sustainable development through a low-
carbon economy and to benefit organizations, project proponents and interested parties worldwide.
Specifically, the use of the ISO 14060 family:
— enhances the environmental integrity of GHG quantification;
— enhances the credibility, consistency and transparency of GHG quantification, monitoring, reporting,
verification and validation;
— facilitates the development and implementation of GHG management strategies and plans;
— facilitates the development and implementation of mitigation actions through emission reductions
or removal enhancements;
— facilitates the ability to track performance and progress in the reduction of GHG emissions and/or
increase in GHG removals.
Applications of the ISO 14060 family include:
— corporate decisions, such as identifying emission reduction opportunities and increasing
profitability by reducing energy consumption;
— risks and opportunities management, such as climate-related risks, including financial, regulatory,
supply chain, product and customer, litigation, reputational risks and its opportunity for business
(e.g. new market, new business model);
— voluntary initiatives, such as participation in voluntary GHG registries or sustainability reporting
initiatives;
— GHG markets, such as the buying and selling of GHG allowances or credits;
— regulatory/government GHG programmes, such as credit for early action, agreements or national
and local reporting initiatives.
This document details principles and requirements for designing, developing, managing and reporting
organization-level GHG inventories. It includes requirements for determining GHG emission and removal
boundaries, quantifying an organization’s GHG emissions and removals, and identifying specific
company actions or activities aimed at improving GHG management. It also includes requirements
and guidance on inventory quality management, reporting, internal auditing and the organization’s
responsibilities in verification activities.
ISO 14064-2 details principles and requirements for determining baselines, and monitoring, quantifying
and reporting of project emissions. It focuses on GHG projects or project-based activities specifically
designed to reduce GHG emissions and/or enhance GHG removals. It provides the basis for GHG projects
to be verified and validated.
ISO 14064-3 details requirements for verifying GHG statements related to GHG inventories, GHG projects,
and carbon footprints of products. It describes the process for verification or validation, including
verification or validation planning, assessment procedures, and the evaluation of organizational,
project and product GHG statements.
ISO 14065 defines requirements for bodies that validate and verify GHG statements. Its requirements
cover impartiality, competence, communication, validation and verification processes, appeals,
complaints and the management system of validation and verification bodies. It can be used as a
basis for accreditation and other forms of recognition in relation to the impartiality, competence and
consistency of validation and verification bodies.
ISO 14066 specifies competence requirements for validation teams and verification teams. It includes
principles and specifies competence requirements based on the tasks that validation teams or
verification teams have to be able to perform.
ISO 14067 defines the principles, requirements and guidelines for the quantification of the carbon
footprint of products. The aim of ISO 14067 is to quantify GHG emissions associated with the life cycle
stages of a product, beginning with resource extraction and raw material sourcing and extending
through the production, use and end-of-life phases of the product.
ISO/TR 14069 assists users in the application of this document, providing guidelines and examples
for improving transparency in the quantification of emissions and their reporting. It does not provide
additional guidance to this document.
Figure 1 illustrates the relationship among the ISO 14060 family of GHG standards.
Greenhouse gases —
Part 1:
Specification with guidance at the organization level for
quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions
and removals
1 Scope
This document specifies principles and requirements at the organization level for the quantification
and reporting of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals. It includes requirements for the design,
development, management, reporting and verification of an organization’s GHG inventory.
The ISO 14064 series is GHG programme neutral. If a GHG programme is applicable, requirements of
that GHG programme are additional to the requirements of the ISO 14064 series.
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
Note 2 to entry: Water vapour and ozone are anthropogenic as well as natural GHGs, but are not included as
recognized GHGs due to difficulties, in most cases, in isolating the human-induced component of global warming
attributable to their presence in the atmosphere.
3.1.2
greenhouse gas source
GHG source
process that releases a GHG (3.1.1) into the atmosphere
3.1.3
greenhouse gas sink
GHG sink
process that removes a GHG (3.1.1) from the atmosphere
3.1.4
greenhouse gas reservoir
GHG reservoir
component, other than the atmosphere, that has the capacity to accumulate GHGs (3.1.1), and to store
and release them
Note 1 to entry: Oceans, soils and forests are examples of components that can act as reservoirs.
Note 2 to entry: GHG capture and storage is one of the processes that results in a GHG reservoir.
3.1.5
greenhouse gas emission
GHG emission
release of a GHG (3.1.1) into the atmosphere
3.1.6
greenhouse gas removal
GHG removal
withdrawal of a GHG (3.1.1) from the atmosphere by GHG sinks (3.1.3)
3.1.7
greenhouse gas emission factor
GHG emission factor
coefficient relating GHG activity data (3.2.1) with the GHG emission (3.1.5)
Note 1 to entry: A GHG emission factor could include an oxidation component.
3.1.8
greenhouse gas removal factor
GHG removal factor
coefficient relating GHG activity data (3.2.1) with the GHG removal (3.1.6)
Note 1 to entry: A GHG removal factor could include an oxidation component.
3.1.9
direct greenhouse gas emission
direct GHG emission
GHG emission (3.1.5) from GHG sources (3.1.2) owned or controlled by the organization (3.4.2)
Note 1 to entry: This document uses the concepts of equity share or control (financial or operational control) to
establish organizational boundaries.
3.1.10
direct greenhouse gas removal
direct GHG removal
GHG removal (3.1.6) from GHG sinks (3.1.3) owned or controlled by the organization (3.4.2)
3.1.11
indirect greenhouse gas emission
indirect GHG emission
GHG emission (3.1.5) that is a consequence of an organization’s (3.4.2) operations and activities, but that
arises from GHG sources (3.1.2) that are not owned or controlled by the organization
Note 1 to entry: These emissions occur generally in the upstream and/or downstream chain.
3.1.12
global warming potential
GWP
index, based on radiative properties of GHGs (3.1.1), measuring the radiative forcing following a pulse
emission of a unit mass of a given GHG in the present-day atmosphere integrated over a chosen time
horizon, relative to that of carbon dioxide (CO2)
3.1.13
carbon dioxide equivalent
CO2e
unit for comparing the radiative forcing of a GHG (3.1.1) to that of carbon dioxide
Note 1 to entry: The carbon dioxide equivalent is calculated using the mass of a given GHG multiplied by its global
warming potential (3.1.12).
3.2.2
primary data
quantified value of a process or an activity obtained from a direct measurement or a calculation based
on direct measurements
Note 1 to entry: Primary data can include GHG emission factors (3.1.7) or GHG removal factors (3.1.8) and/or GHG
activity data (3.2.1).
3.2.3
site-specific data
primary data (3.2.2) obtained within the organizational boundary (3.4.7)
Note 1 to entry: All site-specific data are primary data, but not all primary data are site-specific data.
3.2.4
secondary data
data obtained from sources other than primary data (3.2.2)
Note 1 to entry: Such sources can include databases and published literature validated by competent authorities.
3.2.5
greenhouse gas statement
GHG statement
DEPRECATED: GHG assertion
factual and objective declaration that provides the subject matter for the verification (3.4.9) or validation
(3.4.10)
Note 1 to entry: The GHG statement could be presented at a point in time or could cover a period of time.
Note 2 to entry: The GHG statement provided by the responsible party (3.4.3) should be clearly identifiable, capable
of consistent evaluation or measurement against suitable criteria by a verifier (3.4.11) or validator (3.4.12).
Note 3 to entry: The GHG statement could be provided in a GHG report (3.2.9) or GHG project (3.2.7) plan.
3.2.6
greenhouse gas inventory
GHG inventory
list of GHG sources (3.1.2) and GHG sinks (3.1.3), and their quantified GHG emissions (3.1.5) and GHG
removals (3.1.6)
3.2.7
greenhouse gas project
GHG project
activity or activities that alter the conditions of a GHG baseline and which cause GHG emission (3.1.5)
reductions or GHG removal (3.1.6) enhancements
Note 1 to entry: ISO 14064-2 provides information on how to determine and use GHG baselines.
3.2.8
greenhouse gas programme
GHG programme
voluntary or mandatory international, national or subnational system or scheme that registers,
accounts or manages GHG emissions (3.1.5), GHG removals (3.1.6), GHG emission reductions or GHG
removal enhancements outside the organization (3.4.2) or GHG project (3.2.7)
3.2.9
greenhouse gas report
GHG report
standalone document intended to communicate an organization’s (3.4.2) or GHG project’s (3.2.7) GHG-
related information to its intended users (3.4.4)
Note 1 to entry: A GHG report can include a GHG statement (3.2.5).
3.2.10
base year
specific, historical period identified for the purpose of comparing GHG emissions (3.1.5) or GHG removals
(3.1.6) or other GHG-related information over time
3.2.11
greenhouse gas reduction initiative
GHG reduction initiative
specific activity or initiative, not organized as a GHG project (3.2.7), implemented by an organization
(3.4.2) on a discrete or continuous basis, to reduce or prevent direct or indirect GHG emissions (3.1.5) or
enhance direct or indirect GHG removals (3.1.6)
3.2.12
monitoring
continuous or periodic assessment of GHG emissions (3.1.5), GHG removals (3.1.6) or other GHG-
related data
3.2.13
uncertainty
parameter associated with the result of quantification that characterizes the dispersion of the values
that could be reasonably attributed to the quantified amount
Note 1 to entry: Uncertainty information typically specifies quantitative estimates of the likely dispersion of
values and a qualitative description of the likely causes of the dispersion.
3.2.14
significant indirect greenhouse gas emission
significant indirect GHG emission
organization’s (3.4.2) quantified and reported GHG emissions (3.1.5) complying with the significance
criteria set by the organization
3.3.2
biogenic carbon
carbon derived from biomass (3.3.1)
3.3.3
biogenic CO2
CO2 obtained by the oxidation of biogenic carbon (3.3.2)
3.3.4
anthropogenic biogenic GHG emission
GHG emission (3.1.5) from biogenic material as a result of human activities
3.3.5
direct land use change
dLUC
change in the human use of land within the relevant boundary
Note 1 to entry: Relevant boundary is the reporting boundary (3.4.8).
3.3.6
land use
human use or management of land within the relevant boundary
Note 1 to entry: Relevant boundary is the reporting boundary (3.4.8).
3.3.7
non-anthropogenic biogenic GHG emission
GHG emission (3.1.5) from biogenic material caused by natural disasters (e.g. wildfire or infestation by
insects) or natural evolution (e.g. growth, decomposition)
3.4.3
responsible party
person or persons responsible for the provision of the GHG statement (3.2.5) and the supporting GHG
(3.1.1) information
Note 1 to entry: The responsible party can be either individuals or representatives of an organization (3.4.2) or
project, and can be the party who engages the verifier (3.4.11) or validator (3.4.12).
3.4.4
intended user
individual or organization (3.4.2) identified by those reporting GHG-related information as being the
one who relies on that information to make decisions
Note 1 to entry: The intended user can be the client (3.4.5), the responsible party (3.4.3), the organization itself,
GHG programme (3.2.8) administrators, regulators, the financial community or other affected interested parties,
such as local communities, government departments, general public or non-governmental organizations.
3.4.5
client
organization (3.4.2) or person requesting verification (3.4.9) or validation (3.4.10)
3.4.6
intended use of the GHG inventory
main purpose set by the organization (3.4.2), or a programme, to quantify its GHG emissions (3.1.5) and
GHG removals (3.1.6) consistent with the needs of the intended user (3.4.4)
3.4.7
organizational boundary
grouping of activities or facilities in which an organization (3.4.2) exercises operational or financial
control or has an equity share
3.4.8
reporting boundary
grouping of GHG emission (3.1.5) or GHG removals (3.1.6) reported from within the organizational
boundary (3.4.7), as well as those significant indirect emissions that are a consequence of the
organization’s (3.4.2) operations and activities
3.4.9
verification
process for evaluating a statement of historical data and information to determine if the statement is
materially correct and conforms to criteria
3.4.10
validation
process for evaluating the reasonableness of the assumptions, limitations and methods that support a
statement about the outcome of future activities
3.4.11
verifier
competent and impartial person with responsibility for performing and reporting on a verification (3.4.9)
3.4.12
validator
competent and impartial person with responsibility for performing and reporting on a validation
(3.4.10)
3.4.13
level of assurance
degree of confidence in the GHG statement (3.2.5)
4 Principles
4.1 General
The application of principles is fundamental to ensure that GHG-related information is a true and fair
account. The principles are the basis for, and will guide the application of, the requirements in this
document.
4.2 Relevance
Select the GHG sources, GHG sinks, GHG reservoirs, data and methodologies appropriate to the needs of
the intended user.
4.3 Completeness
Include all relevant GHG emissions and removals.
4.4 Consistency
Enable meaningful comparisons in GHG-related information.
4.5 Accuracy
Reduce bias and uncertainties as far as is practical.
4.6 Transparency
Disclose sufficient and appropriate GHG-related information to allow intended users to make decisions
with reasonable confidence.
The organization may use different consolidation approaches in the case of multiple reporting goals
and requirements defined, for example, by the GHG programme, legal contract or different types of
intended users.
NOTE 2 An organization’s GHG emissions and removals are aggregated from facility-level quantification of
GHG sources and sinks.
NOTE 3 A GHG sink in one period might become a GHG source in another period or vice versa.
When a facility is owned or controlled by several organizations, these organizations should adopt
the same consolidation approach for that facility. The organization shall document and report which
consolidation approach it applies.
The organization shall establish and document its reporting boundaries, including the identification of
direct and indirect GHG emissions and removals associated with the organization’s operations.
6.2.1 General
The organization shall select and use quantification methodologies that minimize uncertainty and yield
accurate, consistent and reproducible results.
The quantification approach should also consider technical feasibility and cost.
NOTE Quantification approach is the process of obtaining data and determining the emissions or removals
from a source or sink. GHG emissions or removals can be obtained through measurement or modelling.
The organization shall explain and document its quantification approach and any changes in
quantification approach.
EXAMPLE Data used for quantification may include the average of truck fuel consumption and its
characteristics as the standard to determine fuel consumption.
NOTE 2 In the case of GHG programmes, characteristics of data used for quantification are usually determined
by the programme operator.
Annex C provides guidance on the selection and collection of data used for quantification.
Except in the case of measurement of emissions and removals, the organization shall select or develop
models for the quantification approach.
A model is a representation of how the source or sink data used for quantification are converted into
emissions or removals. A model is a simplification of physical processes that has assumptions and
limitations.
The organization shall explain and document the justification for the selection or development of the
model, considering the following model characteristics:
a) how the model accurately represents the emissions and removals;
b) its limits of application;
c) its uncertainty and rigour;
d) the reproducibility of results;
e) the acceptability of the model;
f) the origin and level of recognition of the model;
g) the consistency with the intended use.
NOTE Several types of models make use of activity data multiplied by emission factors.
The organization shall quantify biogenic emissions or removals in accordance with Annex D.
The organization shall quantify emissions or removals from imported electricity that is consumed by
the organization, and of exported electricity generated by the organization, in accordance with Annex E.
Specific guidance concerning emissions or removals from agriculture is provided in Annex G.
Base-year emissions or removals may be quantified based on a specific period (e.g. a year or part of a
year where seasonality is a feature of the organization’s activity) or averaged from several periods (e.g.
several years).
If sufficient information on historical GHG emissions or removals is not available, the organization may
use its first GHG inventory period as the base year.
In establishing the base year, the organization:
a) shall quantify base-year GHG emissions and removals using data representative of the
organization’s current reporting boundary, typically single-year data, a consecutive multi-year
average or a rolling average;
b) shall select a base year for which verifiable GHG emissions or removals data are available;
c) shall explain the selection of the base year;
d) shall develop a GHG inventory for the base year consistent with the provisions of this document.
The organization may change its base year, but shall justify any change to the base year.
7 Mitigation activities
If quantified and reported, the organization shall document GHG reduction initiatives and associated
GHG emission or removal differences separately, and shall describe:
a) the GHG reduction initiatives;
b) the spatial and temporal boundaries of the GHG reduction initiatives;
c) the approach (appropriate indicators) used to quantify GHG emission or removal differences;
d) the determination and classification of GHG emission or removal differences attributable to GHG
reduction initiatives as direct or indirect GHG emissions or removals.
EXAMPLE GHG reduction initiatives might include the following:
— energy efficiency;
— afforestation;
— waste minimization;
— alternative fuels and raw materials (AFR) use to avoid landfilling or incinerating the wastes;
— refrigerant management.
8.1.1 The organization shall establish and maintain GHG information management procedures that:
c) provide routine and consistent checks to ensure accuracy and completeness of the GHG inventory;
d) identify and address errors and omissions;
e) document and archive relevant GHG inventory records, including information management
activities and GWPs.
8.1.2 The organization’s GHG information management procedures shall document their consideration
of the following:
a) identification and review of the responsibility and authority of those responsible for GHG inventory
development;
b) identification, implementation and review of appropriate training for members of the inventory
development team;
c) identification and review of organizational boundaries;
d) identification and review of GHG sources and sinks;
e) selection and review of quantification approaches, including data used for quantification and GHG
quantification models that are consistent with the intended use of the GHG inventory;
f) review of the application of quantification approaches to ensure consistency across multiple
facilities;
g) use, maintenance and calibration of measurement equipment (if applicable);
h) development and maintenance of a robust data-collection system;
i) regular accuracy checks;
j) periodic internal audits and technical reviews;
k) periodic review of opportunities to improve information management processes.
9 GHG reporting
9.1 General
The organization should prepare a GHG report, consistent with the intended uses of the GHG inventory,
to facilitate GHG inventory verification. For example, a GHG report may be necessary for participation
in a GHG programme or to inform external or internal users.
A GHG report shall be prepared if the organization chooses to have its GHG inventory verified or makes
a public GHG statement claiming conformity with this document.
GHG reports shall be complete, consistent, accurate, relevant, transparent and planned in accordance
with 9.2.
If the organization’s GHG statement has been independently (third-party) verified, the verification
statement shall be made available to intended users.
If confidential data are withheld from inclusion in a GHG report, this shall be justified.
If the organization decides to prepare a GHG report, 9.2 and 9.3 apply.
g) a description of how biogenic CO2 emissions and removals are treated in the GHG inventory and
the relevant biogenic CO2 emissions and removals quantified separately in tonnes of CO2e (see
Annex D);
h) if quantified, direct GHG removals, in tonnes of CO2e (5.2.2);
i) explanation of the exclusion of any significant GHG sources or sinks from the quantification (5.2.3);
j) quantified indirect GHG emissions separated by category in tonnes of CO2e (5.2.4);
k) the historical base year selected and the base-year GHG inventory (6.4.1);
l) explanation of any change to the base year or other historical GHG data or categorization and any
recalculation of the base year or other historical GHG inventory (6.4.1), and documentation of any
limitations to comparability resulting from such recalculation;
m) reference to, or description of, quantification approaches, including reasons for their selection (6.2);
n) explanation of any change to quantification approaches previously used (6.2);
o) reference to, or documentation of, GHG emission or removal factors used (6.2);
p) description of the impact of uncertainties on the accuracy of the GHG emissions and removals data
per category (8.3);
q) uncertainty assessment description and results (8.3);
r) a statement that the GHG report has been prepared in accordance with this document;
s) a disclosure describing whether the GHG inventory, report or statement has been verified, including
the type of verification and level of assurance achieved;
t) the GWP values used in the calculation, as well as their source. If the GWP values are not taken
from the latest IPCC report, include the emissions factors or the database reference used in the
calculation, as well as their source.
k) if appropriate, explanation of GHG emissions differences between the present inventory and the
previous one.
The organization may aggregate direct emissions and direct removals.
The organization may report optional information separately from the required information and the
recommended information. Each type of optional information described below should be reported
separately from the others.
The organization may report the results of contractual instruments for GHG attributes (market
based approach), expressed in GHG emissions (tCO2e) as well as in the unit of transfer (e.g. kWh). The
organization may report the amount purchased compared to the amount consumed.
The organization may report offsets or other types of carbon credits. If so, the organization:
— shall disclose the GHG scheme under which they were generated;
— may add offsets or other types of carbon credits together if they originate from the same GHG
scheme and are of appropriate vintage;
— shall not add or subtract offsets or other types of carbon credits from the organization’s inventory
of its direct or indirect emissions.
The organization may report GHGs stored in GHG reservoirs.
Annex A
(informative)
A.1 General
Organizations are encouraged to refer to ISO/TR 14069 for additional guidance in applying consolidation
approaches and dealing with double counting.
An organization engaged in setting its organizational boundaries should first define the intended uses
of its GHG inventory by considering its GHG policies, strategies or programmes, operations and facilities
to determine the GHG sources which it can control and those which it may influence.
The intended use of the inventory can help to determine the organizational boundaries (see H.1). In
developing its GHG quantification and reporting system, an organization should ensure that the data
system can meet a range of reporting requirements. GHG data should be recorded and quantified by
source, sink and type, at least to the facility level. Such data should be retained in its disaggregated
form to provide maximum flexibility in meeting a range of reporting requirements. Consolidation of the
information can then be carried out as required.
If the GHG emissions and removals are quantified at the facility level, and according to the intended use
of the GHG inventory, one of the two approaches outlined in A.2 and A.3 should be selected to guide and
assist in the consolidation of facility data to the organization level.
Where possible, organizations should follow the organizational boundaries already in place for their
financial accounting, provided these are explicitly explained and followed consistently. When applying
these concepts, the underlying assumption of “substance over form” should be followed. That is, GHG
emissions and removals should be quantified and reported in accordance with the organization’s
substance and economic reality and not merely its legal form.
Consolidating to the organizational level based on equity share requires establishing the ownership
percentage of each facility, and accounting for that percentage of GHG emissions or removals from
respective facilities, including using production share agreements.
Annex B
(informative)
B.1 General
GHG emissions are aggregated to assist in identifying sources and providing consistency in reporting
GHG inventories.
Each category may be further subdivided, depending on the intended user or other factors.
NOTE 3 Emissions from flaring or venting are quantified as “direct emissions”. Emissions from flaring
and venting could be unintentional or intentional. Examples include: designed releases of CH4 or CO2
containing natural gas or hydrocarbon gas (not including stationary combustion flue gas) to the atmosphere
through seals or vent pipes; equipment blowdown for maintenance; and direct venting of gas used to power
equipment (such as pneumatic devices).
NOTE 4 Intentional reversals of carbon removals, such as back burning to prevent future forest fires,
are quantified as anthropogenic biogenic emissions (negative removal) and reported in accordance with
Annex D.
e) Direct emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF), which
covers all GHGs, from living biomass to organic matter in soils. According to IPCC guidelines[15],
emissions can be assessed in six main land-use categories (forest land, cropland, grassland,
wetland, settlement, other land) and several carbon reservoirs (living above-ground biomass,
living underground biomass, deadwood, leaf litter, soil organic matter). A change in carbon stock
can occur when land use change from one category to another (e.g. converting forest to crop land)
or within a land use category (e.g. converting a natural forest to a managed forest, converting
from till to no-till). Removals occur when there is an increase of carbon stock in the reservoirs.
Emissions occur when there is a decrease and when N2O is emitted.
Options for quantification methodologies: CO2e emissions associated with LULUCF occur after
actions have been undertaken which generate differences in carbon stocks. The period of time
after this action is generally set as 20 years. Thus, organizations may quantify either all emissions
associated with the action (total carbon stock differences) or annual emissions (1/20 of total
carbon stocks differences). If the second option is chosen, emissions should be reported “each time”
during a 20-year period.
NOTE 5 With respect to GHG emissions and removals connected to marine areas, only very limited
information is available.
B.3.1 Summary
This category includes only GHG emissions due to the fuel combustion associated with the production
of final energy and utilities, such as electricity, heat, steam, cooling and compressed air. It excludes
all upstream emissions (from cradle to power plant gate) associated with fuel, emissions due to the
construction of the power plant, and emissions allocated to transport and distribution losses.
NOTE Annex E describes requirements for the treatment of imported and exported electricity.
B.4.1 Summary
GHG emissions occur from sources located outside the organizational boundaries. Those sources are
mobile and are mostly due to fuel burnt in transport equipment. If relevant, the category also includes
emissions associated with:
— refrigeration gas leaks (e.g. chilled transport, air conditioner);
— upstream emissions arising from fuel generation and fuel transportation/distribution;
— construction of the transport equipment (vehicle and infrastructure).
This category includes transport for persons and goods, and for all modes (rail, maritime, air and road).
If transport equipment is owned or controlled by the organization, the emissions shall be taken into
account in category 1 (B.2) as direct emissions.
Options for quantification methodologies: According to the consolidation approach chosen by the
organization, emissions from leased vehicles could be reported either in this category or in the category
for indirect GHG emissions from services used by an organization (B.5.3).
EXAMPLE When the reporting organization is leasing the fleet (as the lessee):
— if financial control approach is chosen, then fleet emissions are reported as indirect;
— if operational control approach is chosen, then fleet emissions are reported as direct.
In respect to which option is chosen, attention should be paid to omission or double counting issues.
NOTE Aircraft GHG emissions under certain circumstances in high altitudes have additional climate impacts
as a result of physical and chemical reactions with the atmosphere. For more information on GHG emissions from
aircraft, see IPCC guidelines[15].
b) Emissions from downstream transport and distribution for goods are emissions from freight
services that are due to the first purchasers or other purchasers throughout the supply chain but
not paid for by the organization.
As for upstream transport and distribution for goods, the same options for quantification
methodologies apply.
c) Emissions from employee commuting, including emissions related to the transportation of
employees from their homes to their workplaces. Telecommuting may incur a greater use of energy
for heating or cooling from part of the employee’s energy consumption at home and thus could be
considered in this subcategory.
d) Emissions from client and visitor transport, including emissions associated with the travel of
clients and visitors to the reporting company’s facility.
e) Emissions from business travel mainly due to fuel burnt in mobile sources of combustion. Hotel
nights might be included when linked to the business travel, i.e. a stay over for flight connections,
when attending a conference or for other business purposes. The indirect emissions generated
during the journey should also be included, if such data are available and significant.
Options for quantification methodologies: Emissions within this subcategory could include either
the total of emissions associated with the production of the capital good or an amortized part of
the total (based on accounting rules or life time duration). If the second option is chosen, emissions
should be reported pro-rata during the amortization period.
When CO2 is stored as carbon in goods for a specified time, this carbon storage should be treated
according to the methodology defined in ISO 14067.
c) Emissions from the use of services that are not described in the above subcategories include
consulting, cleaning, maintenance, mail delivery, bank, etc.
B.6 Category 5: Indirect GHG emissions associated with the use of products from
the organization
B.6.1 Summary
GHG emissions or removals associated with the use of products from the organization result from
products sold by the organization during life stages occurring after the organization’s production
process. Those emissions or removals might cover a very wide range of services and associated
processes.
In most cases, the organization does not know the product’s exact destiny through its life stages and,
thus, should define plausible scenarios for each life stage.
The scenarios should be clearly explained in the report.
b) Emissions from downstream leased assets include those from the operation of assets that are
owned by the reporting organization and leased to other entities during the reporting year. This
subcategory is applicable to the lessors (i.e. an organization that receives payments from lessees).
c) Emissions from end of life stage of the product include the emissions associated with the end of life
of all products sold by the reporting organization in the reporting year. Generally, the emissions
sources and sinks are those concerned with disposal of solid and liquid waste (B.4.1). However,
for the use stage of the product (B.5.1), the organization should define “end of life scenarios”.
Consequently, the emissions from this subcategory are closely linked to these scenarios.
d) Emissions from investments are mainly targeting private or public financial institutions. Emissions
could result from four types of operations: equity debt, investment debt, project finance and others.
Annex C
(informative)
C.1 General
According to the requirements in Clause 6, this annex describes several approaches focusing on how to
quantify direct emissions (see Figure C.1). Examples are provided to illustrate a wide range of practices
usually implemented by organizations.
Data can be classified as primary or secondary data (depending on who has originally collected it) and
site-specific or not site-specific (depending on if it has been obtained from the original source or sink).
The type of data that needs to be collected depends on the specific GHG’s model, which depends on
requirements such as the final admissible uncertainty, data availability, costs, pre-existence of other
data or other reasons. The type of data that is generally used as input to different quantification
methods includes, but is not limited to:
a) activity data, such as mass, volume, energy or monetary value;
b) calorific values: net or gross, often used as input for higher accuracy combustion and primary and
site-specific activity data calculations;
c) emission factor, usually expressed as tCO2e/quantity of activity data;
d) composition data, usually expressed as carbon content, often used for higher accuracy and primary
and site-specific emission factor calculations;
e) oxidation factors;
f) conversion factors;
g) emissions, usually on a mass basis per a reference period (e.g. hourly);
h) monetary values, usually amounts spent on certain products, materials or services.
Often some of these data are embedded within model assumptions. Sometimes data have to be collected
on site as primary data. This will depend on the admissible uncertainty requirements, which might be
reflected in different tiers of application of the model (see Box 1 for an example).
To determine the relevance of sources, an organization should consider each of the principles found in
Clause 4. Affirmative answers to the following questions should indicate that a GHG source is relevant.
— Relevance: Does the source/sink need to be quantified and reported in order to meet the needs of
the intended user(s) either on its own or in combination with other sources?
— Completeness: Does the source/sink need to be included in the inventory for the inventory to include
all relevant sources?
Site-specific data can be collected from a facility/equipment or can be averaged across facilities/
equipment that have similar functions. They can be measured or modelled.
C.4.3 Laboratories
The organization should ensure that laboratories used to carry out analyses for the determination of site-
specific data are accredited in accordance with associated norms for the pertinent analytical methods.
Sometimes the use of fully accredited laboratories under specific norms might not be possible or would
incur unreasonable costs, in which case it is recommended to demonstrate that the chosen laboratory
has the specific technical competence to carry out accurate analyses for the site-specific data.
C.4.4 Calibration
The organization should ensure that measuring instruments are calibrated at least within the minimum
frequency specified by the manufacturer, in order to operate free of error and within the required
uncertainty range.
by experts and deemed to strike an appropriate balance between local industrial practices and the
necessary accuracy for GHG emissions and removals quantification in the local context.
However, it is possible that industrial systems might have been set in ways, such as for process control
purposes or health and safety reasons, that do not fit with local standard regulatory practice. In
this case, there might be a need to investigate the robustness of the existing practice and to assess
the uncertainty of the specific quantification approach in order to determine its equivalence to
recognized and/or regulatory quantification approaches. In doing so, the organization may apply the
principles and methodologies of ISO/IEC Guide 98-3 in completing the uncertainty assessment. Higher
levels of precision are generally acceptable but lower levels should be justified. For example, a typical
justification is consideration of unreasonable costs.
The model selection should take into consideration quantitative and qualitative aspects of its data
inputs, namely:
— accuracy: the accuracy of the data collected should reflect the GHG model and the final uncertainty
required for the quantification approach;
— frequency: data should be collected at the appropriate frequency, being able to capture process
variability that might lead to differences in emissions;
— timeliness: data should represent the reality of the time period for which they are being used to
characterize emissions; otherwise, that should be noted as an assumption or estimation;
— completeness: the data series for the period in question should be complete, attending to the
specified frequency of collection;
— control: whether the user is in control of the measurement devices and, if not, whether it is possible
to obtain information about these devices;
— validity: the data are valid if they conform to specified requirements. The validity of data could
be subject to an external verification. For example, a specified meter will produce reliable results
only within its applicability range. If operated outside that range, its data output might not be
considered valid.
All the aspects listed above have an impact on the accuracy, cost, technical feasibility and reproducibility
of the quantification approach.
For example, in many cases for relatively small sources, it may be sufficient to document activity data
through receipts that specify the physical amounts of fuel. In this case, the operator of the source may
not control the measuring devices being used to monitor its activity data. Control of measuring devices
would be the responsibility of the supplier or the actual producer of the fuel. Provided the transactions
are done legally, one would assume that any metering involved would respect standardized and
minimum practices in terms of measurement uncertainty, calibration, stability, etc. within the given
jurisdiction. This practice relies on the supplier measurement system and considerably decreases the
costs and enhances the technical feasibility of GHG quantification and reporting.
Other situations where issues of cost and feasibility might need to be considered include:
— switching from default calculation values to site-specific values;
— increasing the frequency of data collection and analyses per source/sink;
— where the specific measuring task does not fall under national legal metrological control, the
substitution of measuring instruments with instruments complying with the requirements of legal
metrological control of the given jurisdiction in similar applications;
— shortening of calibration and maintenance intervals of measuring instruments;
— for the determination of site-specific data, the use of laboratories that can demonstrate competence
and ability to generate technically valid and accurate results or the use of external laboratories that
are accredited for the determination of site-specific data;
— improvement of data flow activities and control activities reducing the inherent or control risk
significantly.
Annex D
(normative)
This annex provides requirements and guidance for the treatment of biogenic GHG emissions and CO2
removals.
Anthropogenic biogenic GHG emissions and removals are a result of human activity. Anthropogenic
biogenic GHG emissions (e.g. CO2, CH4 and N2O) may result from biomass combustion as well as other
processes (e.g. aerobic and anaerobic decomposition of biomass and soil organic matter).
Anthropogenic biogenic CO2 emissions and removals shall be quantified and reported separately from
anthropogenic emissions. Anthropogenic biogenic emissions and removals of other GHGs (e.g. CH4 and
N2O) shall be quantified and reported as anthropogenic.
Non-anthropogenic biogenic GHG emissions and CO2 removals caused by natural disasters (e.g. wildfire
or infestation by insects) or natural evolution (e.g. growth, decomposition) may be quantified and, if so,
shall be reported separately.
Annex B provides specific/sectorial guidance on GHG emission quantification.
Annex E
(normative)
Treatment of electricity
E.1 General
This annex provides requirements and guidance for the treatment of imported electricity consumed by
the organization and of exported electricity generated by the organization.
The requirements and guidance described below for electricity also apply to imported and exported
heating, steam, cooling and compressed air.
E.2.1 General
Emissions from imported electricity consumed by the organization shall be quantified by the
organization using the location-based approach by applying the emission factor that best characterizes
the pertinent grid, i.e. dedicated transmission line, local, regional or national grid-average emission
factor. Grid-average emission factors should be from the emissions year being reported, if available, or
from the most recent year if not. Grid-average emission factors for imported consumed electricity shall
be based on the average consumption mix of the grid from which electricity is consumed.
Emission factors may also include other indirect emissions associated with generation of electricity,
such as:
— transmission and distribution losses;
— other life cycle processes used in generating the electricity such as extracting, transporting and
processing the fuel, and/or the processes used in producing the capital equipment for generating
the electricity.
The inclusion of those indirect emissions should be quantified, documented and reported separately
(see B.4.1).
NOTE The location-based approach is a method to quantify indirect emissions from energy based on average
energy generation emission factors for defined geographic locations, including local, subnational or national
boundaries.
— is produced within the country, or within the market boundaries where consumption occurs if the
grid is interconnected.
For operations located in small island developing states (SIDS), a market-based approach may be used
to quantify GHG emissions related to electricity consumption for such processes, irrespective of grid
inter-connectivity.
NOTE 1 SIDS are defined by the United Nations[22].
When the organization uses those contractual instruments for GHG emission attributes, including
renewable energy certificates, these transactions shall be documented and reported separately (see
Clause 9).
NOTE 2 Contractual instruments are any type of contract between two parties for the sale and purchase of
energy bundled with attributes about the energy generation, or for unbundled attribute claims.
EXAMPLE Contractual instruments can include energy attribute certificates, RECs, GOs, PPAs, green energy
certificates, supplier specific emission rates, etc.
NOTE 3 The market-based approach is a method to quantify the indirect emissions from energy of
a reporting organization based on GHG emissions emitted by the generators from which the reporting
organization contractually purchases electricity bundled with contractual instruments, or contractual
instruments on their own.
Annex F
(informative)
To encourage completeness, consistency and readability, the organization should consider organizing
the GHG report according to the following chapters.
a) Chapter 1: General description of the organization goals and inventory objectives.
This chapter includes the description of the reporting organization, persons responsible, purpose
of the report, intended users, dissemination policy, reporting period and frequency of reporting,
data and information included in the report (list of GHGs taken into account and explained), and
statements by the organization about verification.
b) Chapter 2: Organizational boundaries.
This chapter includes the description and explanation of boundaries and consolidation
methodologies.
c) Chapter 3: Reporting boundaries.
This chapter includes the description and explanation of emissions categories that are considered.
d) Chapter 4: Quantified GHG inventory of emissions and removals.
This chapter includes the quantified data results by emission or removal category, description of
methodologies and activity data used, references and/or explanation and/or documentation of
emission and removal factors, uncertainties and accuracy impacts on results (disaggregated by
category), and description of planned actions for reducing uncertainty for the future inventory.
e) Chapter 5: GHG reduction initiative and internal performance tracking.
The organization may report its GHG reduction initiatives and the results of its internal performance
tracking.
An example of an illustrative template to provide a framework for reporting is given in Figure F.1.
Key
(1) Category 1 (direct emission) is subdivided in accordance with the recommendations of Annex B.
(2) Indirect emissions are subdivided in accordance with the recommendations of Annex B and are fully compatible
with standards requirements.
NOTE These are the only fixed parts of the framework. The labelling of entries under each of these categories
is a matter of choice by the reporting organization, although adherence to International Standards and good
accounting practices is encouraged.
Annex G
(informative)
G.1 General
Globally, agriculture and food production activities are responsible for a significant portion of annual
GHG emissions. The major sources of agricultural emissions include: enteric fermentation (CH4),
application of nitrogenous fertilisers (N2O), manure management (CH4) and (N2O), and rice cultivation
(CH4). Agriculture involves the production of crops, livestock, poultry, fungi, insects and other inputs
for industry.
This annex is intended to assist crop and livestock producers and related farm-level organizations to
quantify and report their direct, indirect and biogenic GHG emissions and removals. This guidance will
also be helpful to upstream or downstream organizations that seek to understand their value chain
GHG impacts from agriculture. To achieve harmonization, this annex incorporates information from
Reference [13]. The topics described follow the clauses in this document. Refer to Clause 1 for the Scope,
Clause 3 for terms and definitions, and Clause 4 for the principles.
There may be some cases when carbon stocks can change due to natural disturbances, payments for
environmental services (PESs) and changes in areas set for conservation. In cases such as these, the
CO2 fluxes should be accounted for in the same way as agricultural activities.
— wetlands to cropland
Organizational (upstream/downstream) emissions from agriculture, as shown in Table G.3, are optional
but encouraged.
For natural disturbances, the GHG fluxes may be reported in a line item separate from the direct,
indirect, and biogenic carbon categories.
Companies should not report the information shown in Table G.5.
— it does not include methods for product-level GHG accounting (e.g. product category rules);
NOTE 2 For guidance on these areas, see ISO 14067.
— it does not provide accounting methods for indirect land use change (iLUC);
— it does not address the accounting steps needed to create offset credits from soils, biomass or other
sources located on farms, reforestation or restoration of degraded lands, or changes in fertilizer
management;
— it does not consider agricultural offset and renewable energy projects that are potential sources of
offset credits:
— wind turbines, solar panels, solar water heating, anaerobic digesters for CHP, micro-scale
hydroelectricity (typically less than ~100 kW);
— growing trees, short rotation woodland, other sources of biomass fuel stock;
— installing anaerobic digesters to produce methane as fuel for electricity or heat;
— it does not address environmental impacts other than GHG fluxes, such as emissions of air pollutants,
water impacts and use, eutrophication, health and other environmental impacts. Consequently, the
guidance in this annex cannot be used by itself to evaluate the possible trade-offs between GHG
emissions reductions and other environmental impacts of a given farming practice.
Indirect land use change (iLUC) should be considered in carbon footprint (CFP) studies, once an
internationally agreed procedure exists. All choices and assumptions shall be justified and documented.
NOTE 3 There is ongoing research to develop methodology and data for the inclusion of iLUC in GHG reporting.
Annex H
(informative)
H.1 General
See 5.2.3. Organizations should use the following process to identify, evaluate and select significant
indirect emissions.
H.3.1 Consider the way the principles may apply to determine criteria.
— Relevance: Consider which indirect emissions or removals need to be selected in order to meet the
needs of the intended user(s) (e.g. customers, suppliers, investors, governments, NGOs) either on
their own or in combination with other sources.
— Completeness: Consider which indirect emissions and removals need to be included in the inventory
for the inventory to include all relevant sources.
— Consistency: Consider whether inclusion of the indirect emissions and removals is necessary for a
user to make meaningful comparisons (e.g. GHG-related information within the inventory).
— Accuracy: Consider whether the inclusion of the indirect emissions and removals, on their own or
in combination with other sources, is necessary for the inventory totals to be reasonably free from
uncertainty.
— Transparency: Consider whether exclusion of the indirect emissions and removals, without
disclosure and justification, impedes intended users from making decisions with reasonable
confidence.
H.3.2 Criteria used to evaluate significance of indirect emissions may include the following.
— Magnitude: The indirect emissions or removals that are assumed to be quantitatively substantial.
— Level of influence: The extent to which the organization has the ability to monitor and reduce
emission and removals (e.g. energy efficiency, eco-design, customer engagement, terms of reference).
— Risk or opportunity: The indirect emissions or removals that contribute to the organization’s
exposure to risk (e.g. climate-related risks such as financial, regulatory, supply chain, product
and customer, litigation, reputational risks) or its opportunity for business (e.g. new market, new
business model).
— Sector-specific guidance: The GHG emissions deemed as significant by the business sector, as
provided by sector-specific guidance.
— Outsourcing: The indirect emissions and removals resulting from outsourced activities that are
typically core business activities.
— Employee engagement: The indirect emissions that could motivate employees to reduce energy use
or that federate team spirit around climate change (e.g. energy conservation incentives, carpooling,
internal carbon pricing).
Organizations may map their value chain in order to identify indirect emissions within the categories
defined in 5.2.4 and the subcategories defined in Annex B.
The organization should balance the criteria of estimated magnitude with the accuracy and cost of
obtaining the data, as well as other criteria (e.g. risk and opportunity, needs of intended users) in order
to determine whether the indirect emissions source is significant or not.
The organization should justify its determination of whether indirect emissions and removals are
significant.
Bibliography
[20] Basic Guidelines on Accounting for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Throughout the Supply Chain.
Ver. 1.0, March 2012. Ministry of the Environment and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry,
Government of Japan
[21] Canada Facility Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Program. Technical Guidance on Reporting
Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Environment Canada, November 2013
[22] Small Island Developing States. United Nations. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment
.un.org/topics/sids/list
ICS 13.020.40
Price based on 47 pages