This document provides an introduction to the study of history and historiography. It discusses key concepts like primary and secondary sources, different schools of thought in history including positivism and postcolonialism, and the subjectivity and interpretation involved in the writing of history. The methodology of history is also examined, including the importance of rigorously analyzing sources and employing historical methods to validate claims and reconstruct the past based on available evidence.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
82 views4 pages
Ghist Reviewer
This document provides an introduction to the study of history and historiography. It discusses key concepts like primary and secondary sources, different schools of thought in history including positivism and postcolonialism, and the subjectivity and interpretation involved in the writing of history. The methodology of history is also examined, including the importance of rigorously analyzing sources and employing historical methods to validate claims and reconstruct the past based on available evidence.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
Introduction to History - Archeology; artifacts
- Linguistics; tracing culture and
Primary sources history - Bridge between past and present - Science; DNA patterns - Studying primary sources connects The dynamism inevitability produced the students to the historians, various perspective resulting to richer experience of understanding and appreciation - What is history - Why study history Historia- knowledge acquired through - History for whom inquiry or investigation All can be answered by; Historiography Has existed around 2400 years ago, same with mathematics and philosophy History Historia became known as account of past - Study of the past persons through written documents and - Event historical evidence - Causes of events - Historians’ duty to document Historiography important individuals (monarch, - Study the history heroes, saints) - How was a certain historical text - Wars, revolutions, and important written? breakthroughs - Who wrote the document? No document no history - What as the context? - What historical method was History progressed and accepted employed? possibilities of valid historical sources Question and issues in history - Government records, chroniclers accounts, personal letters - State use history to unite a nation - Legitimize regimes and forget a Historical sources are exclusive sense of collective identity through - Historical documents may be lost collective memory burned or destroyed - History that has been taught and - Elite vs commoners written is always intended for a certain group of people reformists; This historical loopholes in historical Spain, white man’s burden sources were recognized by historians, not written but the same time School of thoughts in history
- Oral traditions like epic and song. Positivism
Because of this breakthrough - 18th – 19th century
- Empirical evidence History starts collaborating with other - No document, no history disciplines - Historian were required to shoe - Subjectivity= process of historical evidence. research, the research methodology; selection and presentation of facts Postcolonialism History is always subjective - Early 20th century - Colonies go away from the shadows - Can history still be considered as an of their colonial past academic and scientific history - 2 things Historical research - Tell their own history, highlights identity of free from colonial powers - Requires rigor and technicalities - Criticize the methods, and effects of - Historical methodology comprises colonialism certain techniques historians follow - To properly utilize sources and History is always written by victors historical evidence More dominant player - There are historical methods applied in writing history Ex. Us is always hero during WWII and - Historical claims shall be validated Filipinos who collaborated with Japanese are e.g., triangulation technique traitors The methodology of History HISTORY History as reconstruction - If history is written with agenda or heavily influenced by the historians, - Only a part of what was observed in will there be absolute historical truth the past was remembered by those - Is history an objective discipline? who observed it; only a part of what - If not, is it still worthwhile to study? was remembered was recorded; only - An exact and accurate account of the a part of what was recorded has past is impossible survived; only a part of what has - It is therefore the historian’s job not survived has come to the historian’s only to seek historical facts but also attention “only a part of what is to interpret them. credible has been grasped and only a - The historian is not a blank paper part of what has been grasped can be that mechanically interprets and expounded or narrated by the analyzes historical facts historian - He is a person of his own, influences What is historical method by his context, environment, ideology, education, and influences - Historians have to verify sources to among others date them, locate their place, or - Thus, his interpretation might have origin and identify their intended affected by any of the functions aforementioned - The process of critically examining and analyzing the records and survivals of the past Sources they are available in original format, in microfilm/microfiche in digital - An object from the past or testimony format or in published format concerning the past on which historians depend in order to create Four main categories of primary sources their own depiction of the past 1. Written sources Tangible 2. Images 3. Artifacts - Remain of the past 4. Oral testimony Written sources What are secondary sources 1. Published materials A secondary source interprets and analyzes - Books, magazines, journals, primary sources. These sources are one or travelogue more steps removes from the event - Transcription of speech 2. Manuscript (any handwritten or Secondary sources may have pictures, typed record that has not been quotes or graphics or primary sources in printed them. - Archival materials What are secondary sources - Memoirs, diary Examples Non written sources - History textbook - Oral history - Printed materials - Artifacts - Serials - Ruins - Periodicals which interprets previous - Fossils research - Art works - Videorecording Practical example - Audio recording Topic; Tejeros Convention What are primary sources? Primary source; Santiago Alvarez Account - Testimony of an eyewitness - A primary source must have been Secondary Sources; Teodoro Agoncillo’s produced by a contemporary of the Revolt of the masses event it narrates What is historical/ source criticism - A primary source is a document or physical object which was written or - In order for a source to be used as created during the time under study evidence in history, basic matters - These sources were present during an about its form and content must be experience or time period and offer settled and inside view of a particular event - External criticism - Primary sources are characterized by - Internal criticism their content, regardless of whatever External criticism - The trustworthiness or the observer; is the author lying or telling what he Primary document or she believes is truth? - When written External criticism - Where was it written - Why did it survive - The problem of authenticity - Who was the real author? - To spot fabricated, forged, faked, - Authentic documents - To distinguish a hoax or Internal criticism misrepresentation Primary document Test of authenticity - Eyewitness or secondhand account 1. Determine the date of document to - Why was it written see whether they are anachronistic - Literal meaning ex. Pencil did not exist before the - Internal consistency 16th century - Connotations 2. Determine the author ex. Howell and prevenier enumerate the chief Handwriting, signature, seal elements of service 3. Anachronistic style 4. Anachronistic reference to events ex. - The genealogy of the document Too early, too late, to remote whether it is original, a copy, or a 5. Provenance or custody ex. copy, copy of a copy Determines its genuineness - The genesis of the document, the 6. Semantics- determining the meaning circumstances authority, and events of a text or word in or under which it was produced 7. Hermeneutics- determining - The originality of the document, ambiguities whether it is innovating or merely passing on already current Internal criticism information The problem of credibility relevant - The interpretation of the document, particular in the document is credible the extraction of some kind of meaning from it. Verisimilar- as close as what really - The authorial authority of the happened from a critical examination of best document, the relation of its author available sources to the subject matter, whether, 1. Identification of the author ex. To eyewitness, earwitness or even determine his reliability; mental further removed processes, personal attitudes - The competence of the observer; is 2. Determination of the approximate the author qualified to repost and date ex. Handwriting, signature, seal capable of reporting critically and 3. Ability to tell the truth with comprehension 4. Willingness to tell the truth 5. Corroboration