Collection Development Theory
Collection Development Theory
In building library collections that are right on target for the community, according to G.
Edward Evans, collection development is one of the processes that can be used. Where this process
can identify library materials based on user needs and community resources by detailing their
weaknesses and strengths. In this process, user community information is needed to be able to
develop collection development.
Collection development is the process of making certain the library meets the information
needs of its service population in a timely and economical manner, using information resources
produced both inside and outside the organization.
The main purpose of libraries and other information units is to assist in the transfer of
information and the development of knowledge
Collection development, to be effective, must be responsive to the total community’s needs,
not just to those of the current or the most active users.
Allocation of right budget to the right department for the right material is one of the major
components in collection management. Besides the above factors, kind of library, size of library,
specialization areas of library, intellectual level of users, and the merit of the individual book and
the frequency of use of the existing collection are a few important factors in collection management.
Collection development was, is, and always will be subjective, biased work. A periodic
review of the selector’s personal biases and their effects on the selection process is the best check
against developing a collection that reflects personal interests rather than user interests. Collection
development is not learned entirely in the classroom or from reading. Only through practice, taking
risks, and learning from mistakes will a person become proficient in the process of developing a
collection.
Collection Assesment
In order to provide appropriate collection to the community, a library or information center
needs to learn what information the community needs. This is done by colllecting data through
analysis. The data about users collected from the analysis are valuable in policy formulation,
selection activities, and evaluation projects. Selection officers should base policy formulation and
modification on the data collected. Any assessment of the collection should include a consideration
of how well it meets the expectations and needs of the users.
Effective collection development is possible only when it is based on sound knowledge of
the service community. All types of libraries should engage in needs assessment. Though
emphasizing the public library environment because of its complex service population, can be
modified for use in any type of library or information center environment.
When viewed from the format of its contents, the library collection consists of the following:
1. Reference collection;
2. Teaching materials;
3. Serial issue;
4. Government publications;
5. Local content;
6. Reading material for intellectual recreation.
Evaluation
Collection evaluation is an activity of correcting, assessing library materials by going through
various stages in their activities, the form of progress and development of procurement and
correction of library collections. Evaluation of collections in a library is a mandatory activity and
must be carried out for service and user satisfaction with library collections/information, with
library evaluation it can be known and measure the needs and feasibility or benefits of a collection.
Internal Reasons
Collection development needs
• What is the true scope of the collections (i.e., what is the subject
coverage)?
• What is the depth of the collections (i.e., what amount and type of
material constitute the collection)?
• How does the service community use the collection (i.e., what are
the circulation and use within the library)?
• What is the collection’s monetary value? (This must be known for
insurance and capital assessment reasons.)
• What are the strong areas of the collection (in quantitative and
qualitative terms)?
• What are the weak areas of the collection (in quantitative and qual¬
itative terms)?
• What problems exist in the collection policy and program?
• What changes should be made in the existing program?
• How well are collection development officers carrying out their du¬
ties?
• Provide data for possible cooperative collection development pro¬
grams.
• Provide data for deselection (weeding) projects.
• Provide data for formal cancellation projects.
• Provide data to determine the need for a full inventory.
Budgetary needs
• Assist in determining allocations needed to strengthen weak areas.
• Assist in determining allocations needed to maintain areas of
strength.
• Assist in determining allocations needed for retrospective collection
development.
• Assist in determining overall allocations.
External Reasons
Local institutional needs
• Is the library’s performance marginal, adequate, or above average?
• Is the budget request for materials reasonable?
• Does the budget provide the appropriate level of support?
• Is the library comparable to others serving similar communities?
• Are there alternatives to space expansion (e.g., weeding)?
• Is the collection outdated?
• Is there sufficient coordination in the collection program (i.e., does
the library really need all those separate collections)?
• Is the level of duplication appropriate?
• Is the cost/benefit ratio reasonable?
Extraorganizational needs
• Provide data for accreditation groups.
• Provide data for funding agencies.
• Provide data for various networks, consortia, and other cooperative
programs.
• Provide data to donors about collection needs.
Conclusion
Collection development should be geared primarily to identify needs of the readers.
Collection development should be carried out in a participatory mode. Organizing
exhibitions and involving the internal and external members of the library in book
selection can fulfill this objective. Collection development was, is, and always be a
subjective, biased work. The interventions of selectors’ personal values into the process
can not be entirely avoided.
Collection development was, is, and always will be subjective, biased work. A
periodic review of the selector’s personal biases and their effects on the selection process
is the best check against developing a collection that reflects personal interests rather
than user interests. Collection development is not learned entirely in the classroom or
from reading. Only through practice, taking risks, and learning from mistakes will a
person become proficient in the process of developing a collection.