Chapter 11
Chapter 11
Chapter 11
Massimiliano Landi
Outline
• Definition of Monopolist.
• Multi-Plant Monopoly.
• Welfare Implications.
2
Outline
• Definition of Monopsony
• Welfare implications
3
Monopolist
• Monopolist: A single firm that has market power:
B. Natural Monopoly.
C. Network Externalities.
E. Government Contracting.
4
Profit Maximisation
• The monopolist faces no competition.
5
Profit Maximisation
6
Explain P′(Q)Q + P(Q)
P
Initial TR
Final TR
P
ΔTR = ΔQ(P + ΔP) + QΔP
P + ΔP
ΔTR ΔP
= P + ΔP + Q
ΔQ ΔQ
Q Q + ΔQ Q
Profit Maximisation
• A single price monopolist with non zero marginal
costs chooses a point on the elastic portion of the
demand curve.
8
Profit Maximisation
Remember the
definition of PED
which I denote
here by ϵ
9
Optimal price
• The profit maximising price is therefore a multiple of
MC(Q), as follows (from MR(Q) = MC(Q))
|ϵ|
P= MC(Q)
|ϵ| − 1
• Common practice is to set a price that is a multiple
of MC(Q) but the multiplying factor is not estimated
from the demand (and probably the marginal cost
is computed differently)
10
Markup
• Markup: Difference between P and MC(Q) relative
to P.
P − MC(Q)
Markup =
P
11
Comparative Statics (Meta
learning moment)
Discuss with your classmates what happens to the
monopolist best price and best quantity when
1. Demand increases
12
Cartels (Collusion)
13
Cartels (Collusion)
14
TR
As MC ↑, TR ↓
P, MR, MC
MC+T
MC
15
Q
Multi Plant Monopolist
16
Multi Plant Monopolist
• Logic: Suppose for given total output marginal costs in the
two plants differ. Say MC1(Q1) > MC2(Q2)
17
Multi Plant Monopolist
Profit maximisation shows the result too
18
Back to Cartels
19
Multi Market Monopolist
20
Multi Market Monopolist
• Logic: suppose at the current production marginal revenue in
one market is greater. Example, MR1(Q1) > MR2(Q2)
21
Multi Market Monopolist
Profit maximisation shows the result too
22
Welfare Analysis
• As anticipated, a Single Price Monopolist is
inefficient.
23
Monopsony
24
Monopsony
• Labor market application: one big firm hiring workers
26
Profit maximisation
max Pf(L) − w(L)L − FC
L
27
Profit maximisation
w w(L) + w′(L)L
w(L)
we DWL
w*
pf′(L)
L* Le 28 L
Monopsony
29