2-Computing Limits
2-Computing Limits
2-Computing Limits
MAC 2311
In this section we will discuss techniques for computing limits for different types of functions and
present a few basic rules to help us simplify the computation of limits.
1 Limit Laws
Assuming the limits lim f (x) and lim g(x) both exist, then:
x→a x→a
n
mn
• Power: lim (f (x)) m = lim f (x) , where n, m are integers with no common factors and m 6= 0
x→a x→a
Note: These laws are also true for one-sided limits as x → a− and x → a+ .
f (x)2
Example 1: Given lim f (x) = 5, lim g(x) = 8, lim h(x) = 2, compute lim . In your
x→2 x→2 x→2 x→2 g(x) − 3h(x)
work, be sure to indicate each use of a limit law.
f (x)2
lim =
x→2 g(x) − 3h(x)
1
2 Common Limits
• The limit for a constant function, f (x) = c, for any constant c:
p(x) p(a)
lim =
x→a q(x) q(a)
if q(a) 6= 0.
• lim ex = e0 = 1
x→0
• limπ cos(2x)
x→ 2
x
• lim
x→1 x + 2
• lim 100
x→3
2
3.2 Evaluating Limits of Functions as Quotients
Just as any other type of limit, when evaluating a limit that contains a quotient, trying direct substi-
tution is the first step. If you substitute in the x-value that is being approached and the result is a
real number, then you are done. However, in the event that the result of direct substitution yields an
invalid output, there are some algebraic techniques we can use to determine the value of the limit, if
it exists.
0
For rational functions, if after trying direct substitution you get a result of (an indeterminate form),
0
then try factoring the numerator and/or denominator or try simplifying in order to find a common
factor that can be canceled before trying direct substitution again.
x2 + x − 2
Example 3: Evaluate the following: lim
x→1 x2 − x
12 + 1 − 2 0
Let’s try direct substitution first: 2
→
1 −1 0
0
Since direct substitution results in the indeterminate form of , let’s try factoring the expression and
0
canceling before utilizing direct substitution again.
x2 + x − 2 (x − 1)(x + 2)
lim 2
= lim
x→1 x −x x→1 x(x − 1)
x+2
= lim
x→1 x
1+2
=
1
= 3
1
− 13 x
Example 4: Evaluate the following: lim
x→3 x − 3
1
− 31
3 0
Direct substitution: → Simplify/factor expression:
3−3 0
1
x
− 31 3
3x
x
− 3x
lim = lim
x→3 x − 3 x→3 x − 3
3−x
3x
= lim
x→3 x−3
3−x
= lim
x→3 3x(x − 3)
−1(x − 3)
= lim
x→3 3x(x − 3)
−1
= lim
x→3 3x
−1
=
3·3
1
= −
9
3
x2 + 4x + 3
Example 5: Evaluate the following: lim
x→−3 2x + 6
x3 − 8
Example 6: Evaluate the following: lim
x→2 x2 − 4
1 − x4
Example 7: Evaluate the following: lim
x→4 4 − x
4
For limits of quotient functions involving a square root in the numerator or denominator, if direct
0
substitution leads to the indeterminate form of , then we should try using the conjugate to rationalize
0
the expression in order to find a common factor to cancel before utilizing direct substitution again.
x−4
Example 8: Evaluate the following: lim √
x→4 x−2
4−4 0
Direct substitution: √ →
4−2 0
Let’s try using the conjugate to rationalize the expression, cancel a common factor, and then direct
substitution.
√
x−4 x−4 x+2
lim √ = lim √ ·√
x→4 x−2 x→4 x−2 x+2
√
(x − 4)( x + 2)
= lim
√ x−4
x→4
= lim ( x + 2)
x→4
√
= 4+2
= 4
√
x+8−3
Example 9: Evaluate the following: lim
x→1 x−1