CRITERIA 2 P

S.No: Sub-Criteria Sub-Criteria & Marks

Program Curriculum
1 2.1
(30)
 Teaching-Learning
2 2.2.
Processes (70)
 CRITERIA 2 Program Curriculum and Teaching –Lea
Descrition

2.1.1. State the process for designing the program

curriculum (10)

2.1.2. Structure of the Curriculum (5)

2.1.3. State the components of the curriculum (5)

2.1.4. State the process used to identify extent of

compliance of the curriculum for attaining the
Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes
as mentioned in Annexure I (10)

2.2.1. Describe Processes followed to improve

quality of Teaching & Learning (15)

2.2.2. Quality of end semester examination, internal

semester question papers, assignments and
evaluation (15)
2.2.3. Quality of student projects (20)

2.2.4. Initiatives related to industry interaction (10)

2.2.5. Initiatives related to industry

internship/summer training (10)
TERIA 2 Program Curriculum and Teaching –Learning Processes (100)
Evaluation Guidelines

Process used to demonstrate how the program curriculum is

evolved and periodically reviewed considering the POs and
PSOs. Also consider the involvement of the Industry (10)

The curriculum is well balanced structure & appropriate for a

degree program(5)

The curriculum is well balanced structure & appropriate for a

degree program(5)

Process used to identify extent of compliance of

curriculum for attaining POs & PSOs (10)

Adherence to Academic Calendar (2)

Use of various instructional methods and pedagogical

initiatives (2)

Methodologies to support weak students and encourage

bright students (2)

Quality of classroom teaching (Observation in a Class) (2)

Conduct of experiments (Observation in Lab) (2)

Continuous Assessment in the laboratory (3)

Student feedback of teaching learning process and action

taken (2)
Process for internal semester question paper setting and
evaluation and effective process implementation (3)
Process to ensure questions from outcomes / learning levels
perspective (2)

Evidence of COs coverage in class test / mid-term tests (5)

Quality of Assignment and its relevance to COs (5)

Identification of projects and allocation methodology to

Faculty Members(2)
Types and relevance of the projects and their contribution
towards attainment of POs and PSOs (2)

Project related to Industry (3)

Process for monitoring and evaluation (2)

Process to assess individual and team performance (3)

Quality of completed projects/working prototypes (5)

Evidences of papers published /Awards received by projects,

etc. (3)

Industry supported laboratories (2)

Industry involvement in the program design and Curriculum

(3)

Industry involvement in partial delivery of any regular

courses for students (3)

Impact analysis of industry institute interaction and actions

taken thereof (2)

Industrial training/tours for students (2)

Industrial /internship /summer training of more than

two weeks and post training Assessment (3)

Impact analysis of industrial training (2)

Student feedback on initiative (3)

g –Learning Processes (100)
Data/Files Required

Documentary evidence to indicate the process which demonstrate how the program
curriculum is evolved and periodically reviewed considering the POs and PSOs.

Syllubus book (Regulation wise)

Syllubus book (Regulation wise)

Documentary evidence to indicate the process which ensures mapping/compliance

of Curriculum with the POs & PSOs.

Availability of Academic Calendar based on University academic calendar and its

effective compliance
Documentary evidence to support implementation of pedagogical initiatives such as
real life examples, collaborative learning, ICT supported learning, interactive class
rooms, etc.

Guidelines to identify weak and bright students; post identification actions taken;
impact observed.

Class room ambience; efforts to keep students engaged (also to be verified during
interaction with the students) (Self - explanatory)
Quality of laboratory experience with respect to conducting, recording
observations, analysis etc.(also to be verified during interaction with the students)
(Self - explanatory)
Internal Semester examination and internal marks thereof, Practical record books,
each experiment assessment, final marks based on assessment of all the
experiments and other assessments, if any
Feedback format, frequency, analysis and actions taken (also to be verified during
interaction with students) 3.3.6/SADN/SAD/FB Feedback Form
Process of internal semester question paper setting, model answers, evaluation and
its compliance
Question paper validation to ensure desired standard from outcome attainment
perspective as well as learning levels perspective

Mapping of questions with the Course outcomes

Assignments to promote self-learning, survey of contents from multiple sources,

assignment evaluation and feedback to the students, mapping with the COs

Projects identification and guide allocation process

Projects classification (application, product, research, review etc.) consideration to
factors such as environment, safety, ethics, cost, standards and mapping with
program outcomes and program specific outcomes

Continuous monitoring mechanism and evaluation

Methodology (appropriately documented) to assess individual contribution /

understanding of the project as well as collective contribution/understanding

Based on Projects demonstration

Quality of place (host) where the paper has been published /quality of competition
in which award has been won

Type of industries, type of labs, objectives, utilization and effectiveness

Documentary evidence

Analysis and actions taken thereof

Type of Industries, planned or non-planned activity, objectives clearly defined, no.

of students participated,relevant area oftraining, visitreport documented

Impact analysis and feedback format, analysis and actions taken (also to be verified
during interaction with students)
 Finalized File Names/Remarks

(Board of studies members for

approval file, Academic council
meeting file)

AR-17, AR-19, AR-20 Syllabus

AR-17, AR-19, AR-20 Syllabus

(Direct and Indirect attainment

files) - Feedback form - action
taken

Academic Calendar (UG) & (PG)

Internal Assesement Test

(Question paper with key) file

Question Paper File

6.1.5/ACM/IF/SP Student
Projects 6.1.5.2/ACM/IF/SP/PL
List of Student Projects

6.1.5.1/ACM/IF/SP/PRC Project
Review Committee

6.4.9/ACM/EC&CA/PP Students
Paper Publications
6.4.1/ACM/EC&CA/IP Students
Innovative Projects

Guest Lectures Conducted for

students

6.4.6/ACM/EC&CA/IVRL
Industrial Visits &
Recommendation Letters
6.4.7/ACM/EC&CA/INT
Students Internships

Training program feedback

format, analysis and actions taken
report file
 CRITERIA 6 Facilities and Technical Supp
S.No: Sub-Criteria Sub-Criteria & Marks

Adequate and well

1 6.1 equipped laboratories, and
technical manpower (40)

Laboratories maintenance
2 6.2
and overall ambiance (10)

Safety measures in
3 6.3
laboratories (10)

4 6.4 Project laboratory (20)

All criteria
CRITERIA 6 Facilities and Technical Support (80)
Evaluation Guidelines Data/Files Required
Adequate well-equipped laboratories to run all the Adequacy; well-equipped
program-specific curriculum (25) laboratories; utilization
Availability of adequate and qualified technical
Self - explanatory
supporting staff (15)

Maintenance and overall ambience (10) Self-explanatory

Safety measures in laboratories (10) Self-explanatory

Facilities & Utilization (20) Self-explanatory

6.2/ACM/LBF LABORATORY FILES

 Finalized File Names/Remarks
6.2.1/ACM/LBF/LD
List of Labs & Details
6.2.2/ACM/LBF/IC
Details of Lab In-charge
6.2.13/ACM/LBF/RM
Repairs/Maintenance/Verification
Reports

Self Explaination

6.2.3/ACM/LBF/OT
Lab Occupancy Time Tables