Asymptotic High Frequency Methods: Ching-Min Lien 2005.04.18
Asymptotic High Frequency Methods: Ching-Min Lien 2005.04.18
Introduction
Asymptotic High Frequency Methods
Geometrical Optics (GO) Physical Optics (PO) Geometrical Theory of Diffraction (GTD)
Uniform Geometrical Theory of Diffraction (UTD)
The length of propagation ray path is stationary and minimized. In particular, the ray path in a homogeneous medium is a straight line.
To satisfy the zeroth-order transport equation the leading term above can be solved as
: radii of principal and orthogonal wavefront curvatures. The Gaussian curvatures can be represented as
Furthermore,
where The EM field will satisfy the following relations since a GO fields are locally plane.
Spherical wave
finite,
Cylindrical wave Plane wave
A phase jump of occurs while the propagation path crosses a ray caustic.
where
(1) can work with any two orthogonal directions transversal to In general, (1) is not diagonal unless planes of principal wavefront curvature are selected.
With a point source assumption, where can be chosen arbitrarily, and thus one may simply set
where
Similarly,
where H-field can be founded with similar procedure. The power density of the EM wave is .
The phases are matches in both linear and quadratic terms. The linear condition is Snells law applied to the axial ray. The quadratic condition is
When , it can be reduced.
are the transformation matrix between the coordinate system of incident/reflection GO rays and that of the local surface.
where
and
are
The Fresnel reflection coefficients of the TE and TM modes. The hard and soft reflection coefficients. 1 and -1 (?)
is determined by the ISB is determined by the RSB It shows discontinuities across the incident and reflection shadow boundaries.
Represent the source radiation in terms of discrete ray tubes. Then trace each ray tube independently. Each ray tube represent a pulse function that has uniform amplitude and quadratic phase variation over its cross section.
Represent the source radiation in terms of ray tubes, and the directions can be determined. Determine the shape of ray cross section.
Circular, triangular or quadratic shapes are polular.
Trace each ray propagating path and its associated shape of cross section.
The shapes of ray tubes are determined by corner rays, power conservation is assumed to be satisfied.
Only central rays are traced. The shapes of tubes are assumed to be circular.
Each ray is traced inside the cavity until it hits the open-end aperture again.
A set of equivalent currents are defined on the aperture. The scattering field are radiated from equivalent currents.
Errors begin to increase with wider angles. Errors increase in longer cavity in which more bounces of rays occur.
A set of equivalent currents are defined by the EM fields radiated from original sources. Ray expansion is performed on the field radiated from
The ray paths launched from the locations of remain the same regardless of the variation of original sources.
Physical Optics
Physical optics (PO) is an equivalent current method based on GO approximation and extend its applications, only in the lit regions.
Lit region: Illuminated by a given field. Shadow region: Not illuminated by the field.
where
Null tangential electric field on its surface. Magnetic current vanishes. Electrical current With image theory on a local planar surface, the scattering field outside the object
which is valid for a large surface radii of curvature compared with wavelength.
Section 3
Image Theory
The PEC can be assumed as an infinite plane. To calculate the field generated according to the monopole. (a), (b) (c), (d)
Edge diffraction
The current distributions in PO approximation do not include any effect caused by edges of region surfaces.
PO can only predict accurate fields in the specular regions where reflection contributions dominate. However, PO provides uniform field distributions and transitions at any place, potentially extending the applicability of GO.
Discontinuous fields across the ISB and RSB. Null fields in the shadow regions. First introduced by Keller. Modified by Pathak and Kouyoumjian later (UTD) Correct the GO based on interpretation of diffraction mechanisms.
A diffracted ray and the corresponding incident ray make equal angles with the edge at the point of diffraction
If the incident ray is perpendicular to the edge, the diffraction cone degenerate to a disk. In two-dimensional case, all rays are by definition perpendicular to the edge.
The diffracted field not only provides contribution in the shadow region, but also provides uniform field distribution across ISB/RSB.
: Diffraction coefficient, depending on the local nature. : Divergence factor due to ray propagation.
The dyadic edge diffraction coefficient can be determined as and the divergence factor is hence
Renders uniform total field distribution while the field point moves across ISB/RSB.
and
Upper/Lower sign applies on the lit/shadow region. The diffracted field is added to the incident/reflected field to result in , and ensure the continuity of fields at ISB/RSB.
Pattern analysis of large aperture antennas, like pyramidal horn and reflector antennas. Antennas near complicated structures like ships, satellites or buildings.
In the E-plane,
Total field:
Region I : GO and two diffracted fields. Region II, IV and VI : Only two diffracted fields. Region III and V : Only one diffracted field.
For GO, only the first term is retained. Hence, the wavelength could not be too large. The wave front is locally plane.
For small x, higher order terms are neglected.
Paraboloids - direct-fed systems and as the main reflector in dual-reflector systems. Hyperboloids - subreflector in the Cassegrain systems. Ellipsoids - subreflector in the Gregorian systems. Main beam and the first few sidelobes
PO and aperture integration (AI) (Close to or within reflection caustics)
Electrically large The radiation directions of interest are near and within the specular reflection region.
Incident megnetic fields can be found by ray tracing. High accuracy in the main beam and near sidelobes. Poor accuracy at wide angles.
UTD Analysis
Accurate sidelobes and wide angles and back lobes. Scattered field For parabolic reflector,
Main beam : PO Side lobes at wide angles : Edge diffracted fields only.
PO and AI do not predict correct sidelobes at wide angles and back lobes.
PO is more effective in predicting the pattern where the reflection dominates.
UTD is used to predict accurate values at these regions. UTD has been used to predict full pattern.
Interaction between antennas and their surrounding structures. The only feasible approach
Use UTD to include all possible ray paths. Direct line-of-sight, reflection, diffraction and multiple bounces.
MoM, FDTD, FEM Reduce the number of unknown required in MoM. Near the edges,
Regular MoM basis, such as pulse functions, are not valid. UTD-Type of solutions as basis.
Hybrid UTD-MoM
is defined as
: unknown coefficients. : related to excitation or incident fields matrix consisting of mutual impedances.
Interior region
HF solutions are valid. Currents can be represented by the UTD-type of basis.
Exterior region
Regular MoM basis.
can be approximated
(a) where are the distances measured from the nth pulse basis to the left and right edges, respectively.
: deduced from (a). N linear equations to be solved. M<<N unknowns. One may randomly select M equations or apply least squares method to solve for the unknowns.
Width of the strip: Regular MoM: 100 basis. Hybrid method: 14 basis
5 pulses in each edge. 4 GTD basis.
Use the results conducted by GTD to calculate the error made by PO. Hence, an equivalent current can be generated. Equivalent current method (ECM)
Future Developments
Most techniques based on GTD/UTD. Other GTD/UTD type of solutions
Typical diffraction mechanisms in radiation Mutual coupling Problems as well as their time domain versions Uniform asymptotic theory (UAT) Spectral theory of diffraction (STD) Incremental theory of diffraction (ITD)
Other solutions
Reference
G. A. Deschamps, Ray Techniques in Electromagnetics, Proc. IEEE, vol.60, pp.1022-1035, 1972. R. Kouyoumjian and P. Pathak, A uniform geometrical theory of diffraction for an edge of a perfectly conducting surface, Proc. IEEE, vol.62, pp.1448-1461, 1974. D. A. McNamara, C. W. I. Pistorius and J. A. G. Malherbe, Introduction to the uniform geometrical theory of diffraction, Artech House, 1990.