2013 Sspa Highlights 58
2013 Sspa Highlights 58
2013 Sspa Highlights 58
Issue 58/2013
Highlights 58.
Susanne Abrahamsson
President
Ports prepare for SECA 2015
in LNG infrastructure project
In line with the IMO’s decision on Sulphur Emission Control Areas to be
established by 1 January 2015, the Baltic Ports Organization has initiated
Long-term relationships the “LNG in Baltic Sea Ports” project, co-financed by the EU TEN-T Multi-
Annual Programme, with the aim of finding the prerequisites for a harmonised
As a company SSPA is growing, both in size
and in adding new knowledge. Our main focus approach on LNG bunker filling infrastructure in the Baltic Sea Area. On the
areas are: basis of SSPA’s extensive involvement as experts in the introduction of LNG,
SSPA has been commissioned to analyse the best options for locations of
• acting as a bridge between research and
implementation in the maritime industry LNG terminals in Scandinavian ports.
• optimising for energy efficiency while
keeping environmental, financial, human
and technological factors in mind and Major role enables a validation including a risk analysis, and furthermore
• ensuring sustainable development through platform developing a pre-design and subsequent design
proper risk management. Of seven ports involved, SSPA Sweden AB is
of the planned infrastructure. For Stockholm
the initial feasibility study was followed by the
Our vision remains unchanged as we strive to responsible for carrying out the pre-investment
preparation of plans on how to arrange LNG
be recognised as your most rewarding partner studies on behalf of Copenhagen – Malmö,
bunkering at Stadsgården, in the passenger
for innovative and sustainable maritime Stockholm and Aarhus, and thus plays a major
area. The final part of the Stockholm activity
development. In order to achieve this vision role in the BPO project. The studies of the two
is to prepare a safety manual for bunkering and
we have defined four core values that we as a former ports are expected to be finalised by Q4
use of LNG in port areas.
company believe in and live by. One of them 2013, while the study of the latter continues
until the end of 2014. For each of the ports the The scope of each port activity has
is long-term relationships, which is why our
expected deliverables is a report functioning as differed and running three separate studies
clients’ aims and visions are important to us.
a decision support, in order to be able to decide within a larger project frame has added to the
Ever since SSPA was founded in 1940, if further measures need to be taken for an LNG SSPA in-house expertise in the field of LNG-
we have supported our clients with services infrastructure. The studies for each of the ports related projects and provided the opportunity
and expertise in the hydrodynamic sphere. have varied in extent, from a feasibility study of setting up a validation platform for methods
Over the years, the scope of our services has with a first step market analysis, localisation used in these kinds of projects. For the ports
increased and now covers most facets of study and investment analysis for Copenhagen involved this means the project set up and
maritime technology. We believe that long- Malmö Port to a more extensive study for Aarhus, methods have been subject to a constant review,
term relationships, in combination with a high that, above the feasibility study, also includes which in turn has enabled cross-checking and
level of integrity, are the most solid founda- getting approval from the authorities, a process validating results.
tion for gaining clients’ trust. A client must be
able to confidently realise its visions with us. Methods used
New technologies need to be tested, new ideas All of the feasibility studies started with market
demonstrated and validated, and SSPA offers studies and volume estimations, where the use
the arena, tools and methods to do this. SSPA of AIS data for traffic flows in a certain area has
acts as a bridge between theory and practice, given the chance to isolate facts needed for
research and implementation, the present and volume estimations. By looking at the number
the future. of passages, number of individual vessels and
In this issue of Highlights you will find a type of vessels, it is possible to gather valid
selection of articles describing some of our data on traffic patterns. Furthermore, gathering
on-going projects. Do not hesitate to contact statistics on vessel segments and age structures,
us, with feedback, comments or questions. combined with outlooks on new building schemes
We hope you enjoy issue 58 of SSPA Highlights. from shipyard order books, makes it possible to
predict future changes in certain fleets or traffic
I would also like to pass on Seasons Greetings flows in various areas.
and my best wishes for a Happy New Year to
Sensitivity analysis is used as a validation
all of SSPA’s clients, partners and colleagues
tool for predicting volume estimations, formula-
in the maritime society. Thank you all for the
ting high and low LNG scenarios for each indi-
opportunities given and the confidence shown
Density plot of ship traffic in the Kattegat. vidual port, with short- and long-term perspec-
in 2013.
The plot is created in IWRAP with AIS-data tives included, relieving final findings or scenario
Susanne Abrahamsson from the Swedish Maritime Administration. layouts, also weighing in scenarios of LNG
Maria Bännstrand
Project Manager.
She has an M.Sc.
in Shipping Systems
and Technology with
a Major in Shipping
Residential buildings
Management and Logistics from
Chalmers University of Technology from
2003. She also graduated as a Master
Mariner in 1999. She has been employed
at SSPA since April 2012, working
primarily with simulation studies and with
Max radius of heat radiation
from fire scenario projects linked to alternative fuels.
Previous employments includes working
at sea and as a ship’s operations manager
Bunkering safety zone
and as a hull insurance underwriter.
Contact information
LNG vessel
G bunker ves
sssel
E-mail: maria.bannstrand@sspa.se
Ex-zone
Ex
E
Ex-z
x zzo
x-z o
one
Heatt radiation
H di tii barrier
b i
Ulrika Roupé
Project Manager.
LNG fuelled vessel
She has an MBA in
Potential
Po
ote zone
ential conflict zo
one Environmental Economics,
Ove
Overlapping
Over zones
safety zone
n
nes
Bunkering safety zone
Bun
Bu and graduated from
protected
protecte
cted from heat radiation
cte Public terminal area
Public access OK
Gothenburg University
during LNG bunkering in 1995. She joined SSPA in 1999 where
Hazardouss iindustry
ndustry Terminal area
she works as project manager in environ-
safety zone with
h restricted access mental, development co-operation and
transport development projects, both in
Sweden and internationally. She mainly
works with environmental projects on
Public road
transports and shipping, environmental
Hazardous industrial Otherr industrial business economic analysis, risk analysis, coastal
activity Restricted
Restri
iicted access
zone management, and international
cooperation.
Risk analysis based on case by case.
Contact information
E-mail: ulrika.roupe@sspa.se
price development. Methodology for localiza- it is vital to follow relevant regulations and laws.
tion studies typically includes acquiring For LNG implementation these laws differ
infrastructure data, e.g. on land-based users, between countries. In the main, specific national
industries, possibilities of accessing a future laws apply for the Port of Aarhus, apart from Harmonisation and dissemination
terminal with various means of transport and relevant international laws and directives, such
interviews with strategic partners and regional In the “LNG in Baltic Sea Ports” project, the
as the Seveso EU directive.
planning authorities. Combining estimated harmonisation and dissemination of results will
volumes with costs of the various ways of be secured via a stakeholder platform where key
storage, distribution and means of transporta- players will be gathered from both the Baltic
tion, gives clear indications about suitable ports and outside the region. Another important
locations and choice of terminal from a cost step in the dissemination process is to develop
EU -
and market analysis perspective. Regulations an LNG handbook, which will include a
suggested approach for LNG bunkering infra-
When it comes to risk analysis methods,
structure and guidelines on how to set up LNG
SSPA follows the FSA methodology (Formal EU directive Parliament - Law
infrastructure in a port.
Safety Assessment, adopted and approved by
the UN International Maritime Organization).
Since, for the Port of Aarhus, the approval Government - Regulations
process included carrying out a risk analysis,
the scope of this risk analysis was based on the
legal requirements of the authorities and the Authorities - Regulations
EIA procedure. The risk analysis focused on the
facility, the terminal and the operational
situation, specifically the bunkering procedure. Rules and regulations process from an EU
For approval processes, in an overall perspective, perspective.
4 Highlights 58/ 2013 – Voyage optimisation on the shallow waters of the Baltic Sea
Lars Markström
Project Manager.
He graduated from
Chalmers Technical
University with an M.Sc.
in Mechanical Engine-
ering and later gained a B.Sc. in Nautical
Science. He has several years’ experience
from R&D in the automotive industry. He
joined SSPA in 2012 and manages research
projects in the e-navigation field and related
risk analysis.
Contact information
E-mail: lars.markstrom@sspa.se
Henrik Holm
Project Manager.
He studied the Masters
program Complex
Adaptive Systems, in
the Engineering Physics
Department, at Chalmers University of
Technology. Previously he worked as Product
Manager at Playscan AB and as Software
Architect at Avail Intelligence, both in
Gothenburg, Sweden. Since starting at SSPA
in January 2013, he has been involved in
various research projects developing route Density plot for the current main transit traffic Density plot for the optimised routes. Carried
optimisation and mathematical modelling. through the Kattegat. Carried out with the IWRAP out with the IWRAP risk assessment tool,
risk assessment tool, based on Helcom’s AIS based on SSPA’s simulated AIS traffic data from
Contact information data for January 2012. (Recalculated to one year.) optimised routes. (Recalculated to one year.)
E-mail: henrik.holm@sspa.se
The chart above depicts the relative importance and performance improvement possible at each individual step in the design process. The first step of
selecting the ship’s basic characteristics and form – where the funnel’s diameter is greatest – is also the step in the design process that has the greatest
impact towards improving (and impairing) the ship’s overall performance. As the design progresses through each successive step the funnel grows
increasingly narrow as more and more of the design is finalized and the performance improvement and impairment potential similarly decreases.
Identifying the big gains saving as well as the application of state-of- This way of working requires a huge amount
One of the common problems in naval archi- the-art energy saving devices, but neither can of information available from other ships and
tecture and ship design is that the main deci- provide the larger gains that can be achieved the opportunity of using state-of-the-art tools
sions, those that have the most influence on by optimising the main dimensions. for hull design and evaluation, but will ensure
what the ship will look like and how it will an optimised result with fewer working steps
perform, are made at a point in time where Hull designers workbench by making the necessary information available
almost no knowledge of the design’s behaviour, The previously mentioned problems can be when the important decisions have to be made.
appearance, and characteristics are available. solved in two ways. The first is to adopt the Having a database with several thousand
The more time spent on the project, the more traditional and well-known design spiral, i.e. ships’ hulls of varying size, shape and type,
knowledge is gathered but less room is available repeating every step and every decision until SSPA can easily predict the performance of a
for changes and improvements. the results are sufficient. This way of working ship with certain dimensions using in-house
A ship’s power consumption, for example, requires a lot of time and money since every theoretical prediction programs. Additionally,
is primarily influenced by the main dimensions step in the design process is repeated several SSPA recently introduced simulation-driven
selected, which is done at a very early stage times. Finally the optimal result will only be design to commercial design projects. The
of the project and mainly driven by financial reached if every decision is questioned after close coupling of various in-house tools,
constraints and the dimensions of existing every single design loop. parametric geometry modelling, and SSPA’s
vessels. A commonly carried out hull form The second way is to gather as much know- main CFD tool SHIPFLOW, through the
optimisation might gain some 5% in power ledge as possible at the very start of the project. cutting edge CAE program FRIENDSHIP-
Highlights 58/ 2013 – Cutting edge tanker design requires out of the box thinking 7
Transport efficiency
opportunity for large energy savings even before
designing the hull lines.
Ship A
Future design target
Only a few months ago ships’ performances Ship B
were measured by their speed at a certain power Ship C
or a power at a certain speed. The class’s best
Fleet average
ship was the fastest. With the introduction of
the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI)
Block coefficient
the measure of a ship’s performance is about to
change. Reduced to its absolute simplest form The picture shows the transport efficiency (defined by DWTD* VS /PDT) of three single ships
and assuming that the quality of the engines and and the fleet average as a function of the block coefficient. The graphic shows, that a ship with
the required auxiliary engines are the same for comparably poor hull lines (Ship B) can be as good as a ship with superb hull lines (Ship C), if the
several ships, the EEDI is defined as the main dimensions are selected in a better way. Ship A combines favourable main dimensions
installed power divided by the transported and high quality hull lines and turns out to be outstanding with regard to transport efficiency.
cargo, which is represented by speed times
deadweight.
Jim Sandkvist
The test channel of approximately ½ nm in the port of Luleå. Inserted is a general example of channel profile. Channel edge depths up to
several meters were measured.
55
50
45
40 Channel [%]
Engine load for each channel passage and corresponding reference tests in level ice and ice free water. Note where channel load crosses the level ice
load, hence a parallel channel favourable.
10 Highlights 58/ 2013 – A proposed design methodology for successfully developing ESDs
In order to test and evaluate the proposed design methodology two generic research devices have been created: Generic Device GD-OK and GD-GK.
Most feasible ESDs to be selected Even though there is a lack of validation studies optimisation of the ESD should be carried out
Most ESDs are used to enhance the flow into of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) RANS for full scale performance from the beginning. A
propulsion devices, and aimed at increasing simulations for full scale ship flow and the results wide range of design parameter variation studies
propulsive efficiency as well as reducing are not yet reliable enough to fully predict global are performed using full scale CFD simulation.
energy loss. The ESD should be designed based quantities, CFD codes can still be used to under- Typical design adjustments can be dimensioning,
on optimum trade-off between power reduction stand the full scale flow and thereby provide positioning and shaping parameters of the ESD.
(favourable effect) and maximum allowable means for better ESD optimisation. Step 2: Confirmation by model testing
resistance increase/cavitation risk (unfavourable As CFD simulations can be conducted at full Based on the evaluation of power gain and
effect). SSPA’s experience has shown that the scale, the scaling problem inherent in model tests detailed analysis of flow characteristics, the most
design of ESDs is specific for a given ship and can be avoided and the prediction of full scale promising ESDs will be selected and tested for
that the best gain can be reached if the hull/ performance of ESDs can be improved by a confirmation.
propeller/ESD is optimised together for each combination of model tests and CFD prediction. As the ESD has been designed in full scale,
specific ship. it cannot be expected that it will perform too well
It is a well-known phenomenon that the Proposed design methodology in model scale. Normal towing tank testing is
flow characteristics in model scale differ from In order to achieve the best possible result, SSPA necessary though, both for baseline performance
the full scale flow field in the wake. This has proposes a design methodology that makes use without ESD, but also for validation of the CFD
been taken into consideration for long time in of all available technical resources in the most in model scale (to be compared to model scale
an experience-based manner by e.g. propeller effective way to its full extent, but within the CFD simulations of the proposed ESD).
designers, working both for design, evaluation limits of its capabilities. The methodology is Step 3: Full scale wake dummy hull
and extrapolation. presented in three steps below. As the flow characteristics in model scale differ
Today it is common practice that the perfor- Step 1: Optimisation of ESD in full scale from actual flow fields around the ship in full
mance of ESDs is measured in the towing tank The optimum configuration obtained from scale in the wake region, the efficiency gain
and evaluated with standard extrapolation model tests/model scale CFD simulation might prediction from model tests is not sufficient for
methods developed for hulls and propellers. not be the optimum in full scale. Therefore, the reliable correlations of power saving between
Highlights 58/ 2013 – A proposed design methodology for successfully developing ESDs 11
Y Y
VelocityX VelocityX
1 1
0.95 0.95
0.9 0.9
0.85 0.85
0.8 0.8
0.75 0.75
0.7 0.7
0.65 0.65
0.6 0.6
0.55 0.55
0.5 0.5
0.45 0.45
0.4 0.4
0.35 0.35
0.3 0.3
model and full scale. On the other hand, the confidence in the design, both for full scale perfor-
absolute accuracy by CFD computation is still mance prediction and possible cavitation/vibration Keunjae Kim
limited, particularly for predicting global quanti- risks. Substantial work has been conducted for
Project Manager.
ties such as speed power performance. the first two steps described above. In order to He graduated from
To address these issues, and to bridge the investigate full potential of the proposed design Chalmers University of
Reynolds number range, an additional step intro- methodology, a research initiative is ongoing in Technology in 1989 with
duced is the design of a full scale wake dummy which the method will be applied to the two test a Ph.D. in Naval
hull, which can create a wake which resembles examples. This will investigate the complete Architecture. Before joining SSPA in 2002
the full scale wake (non-dimensionally). This design methodology and its potential for the future. he had more than 20 years’ experience in ship
idea allows for model testing aiming at higher design at the DSME (Daewoo Shipbuilding &
Marine Engineering Co., Ltd.) in South Korea.
He coordinates large research projects at
Model Tests´ full scale prediction SSPA and is currently leading the CFD
SHIPFLOW model scale working group at SSPA Research.
SHIPFLOW full scale
12 Contact information
E-mail: keunjae.kim@sspa.se
10
Power reduction [%]
6 Michael Leer-
Andersen
4 Project Manager.
He received his M.Sc in
2
Naval Architecture from
0 Denmark’s Technical
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 University in 1996. He started at SSPA in
-2 1997 at Research, and has mainly worked
-4 in the area of CFD, specifically optimisation,
Case No. wash wave prediction and friction on rough
surfaces, including code development.
The figure above indicates that an approximate 5~6% power reduction can be achieved by different Contact information
types of ESDs in model scale as compared to the baseline design. SHIPFLOW computations were E-mail: michael.leer-andersen@sspa.se
able to correctly predict the relative ranking for the ESDs tested. Test cases investigated so far
indicates that full scale CFD predicts lower power gains than model test full scale predictions.
12 Highlights 58/2013 – Ship traffic scheduling in the Göta River
Evolutionary algorithms
An evolutionary algorithm is an optimisation
technique based on Darwinian principles, i.e.
Pilot user interface in the GOTRIS prototype. survival of the fittest. For a given problem, the
input values are expressed as a genome with a
fitness function constructed for evaluating the
problem with the genome input. If it’s a maximisa-
GOTRIS project Testing the prototype system tion problem then the higher the value returned
The GOTRIS project includes a number of The prototype will be tested on pilots, bridge from the fitness function the better that set of
partners, with Viktoria Swedish ICT, The Swedish supervisors and rail traffic control. They will genes solves the problem.
Transport Administration (Trafikverket), InPort each be given a tablet computer with a graphical A large population of input values, i.e. indivi-
and SSPA being the main players in the process interface, see figure above. The interface shows duals, are created and in each generation all
of the prototype system development. Viktoria estimated arrival times along the river as well as individuals are tested with the fitness function. The
Swedish ICT handles project management, InPort bookings for bridges. This will give the actors best ones continue to the next generation, hence
handles the compilation of vessel routes from Safe more advance notice, thus better ability to plan Darwinian. The task for the evolutionary algorithm
Sea Net Sweden as well as the graphical user ahead for incoming traffic. is to find the individual (in our case the vessel) that
interface for pilots and rail traffic control. either maximises or minimises the fitness,
The Swedish Transport Administration’s main Scheduling algorithm depending on the type of problem being solved.
responsibility is to act as a centre for all data The Swedish Transport Administration’s server Evolutionary algorithms have their advantages.
sources, such as train timetables, AIS data and delivers all input data to the SSPA scheduling They are well-suited when the problem at hand
more. SSPA’s role is to develop a scheduling module. Data consists of train timetables, weather has many viable solutions and a large number
module that can handle the many constraints information, pilot bookings, departure times from of variables and in the case when there is no deter-
imposed on traffic on the river. Ideally the ports etc. The module schedules all traffic and for ministic algorithm that solves the task optimally.
algorithm would give each ship a scheduled route each ship it returns a list of holding times at a In more casual terms they are usually a good
from its current position to the next port and also number of positions along the river. approach when the solution is more easily defined
continue to schedule routes to all ports listed in the The scheduling module consists of two in terms of what it shouldn’t be than how it’s
Safe Sea Net Sweden’s list of ports for the ship. chained algorithms. The first one is a basic supposed to be.
The GOTRIS project is funded by
Peter Grundevik
Vice President, Head
of SSPA Research.
He received his Ph.D.
in physics from the
University of Göteborg/
Chalmers University of Technology in 1982.
He then worked at Ericsson Radio Systems
developing sensor techniques. In 1993 he
became president of Dyning Utveckling,
developing communication systems.
He joined SSPA in 1997 and has worked
with telematics, navigation technologies,
and intermodal transport as well as project
co-ordination.
Contact information
Schematic of the GOTRIS area. Graphic: Viktoria Swedish ICT E-mail: peter.grundevik@sspa.se
14 Highlights 58/2013 – City planning using the SEAMAN simulation tool
Is the manoeuvre possible and is it safe? Different situation alternatives were created on the SEAMAN simulator at SSPA.
Screenshot from the simulation. Before the final design of the Hisingsbron will be decided, every measure will be taken to ensure that the guards can pass
scenarios like the one described in the article.
Götaälvbron in the City of Gothenburg as it is today. Hisingsbron will replace the existing bridge around 2020.
around 2020. The project’s total construction hazardous situations during construction and All has been done to maintain safe and effective
period is planned to be approximately five years. operation. In this specific project SSPA worked vessel traffic during the construction and during
A program outline was drafted and consultations closely with COWI and the Municipality of operation.
were held in autumn 2009. The height of the new Gothenburg to evaluate maritime risks and the
bridge will be 13 meters and it will be located just nautical effects of the new bridge’s design.
The simulations
upstream of the existing Götaälvbron. To start
with, at least 80,000 public transport users, 5,000 The main parts of the mission were: SEAMAN is a simulation framework designed
cyclists and pedestrians, and 30,000 drivers will • To verify safe ship passage of the new bridge in-house at SSPA. It draws upon SSPA’s 70 years
be using the bridge on a daily basis. • During construction work: of experience of hydrodynamics and ship
• To verify safe passage of the construction manoeuvring. Through SEAMAN and SSPA’s
site and old bridge. manoeuvring experts that knowledge is brought
The challenge to clients in a way that answers the questions that
SSPA continually works as a partner with large • To eliminate or reduce risks introduced to
each specific client may have. Since each client is
design and construction companies, as well as shipping during all stages of construction,
unique, and each question is unique, SEAMAN
municipalities in city planning. SSPA’s contribu- which was done by simulating identified
is designed from the start to be flexible. In this
tion in the close cooperation with clients is usually critical steps in construction.
particular case the visual cues gained from the
to provide logistic best practice, design collision • To form a documentation to enhance existing bridge opening and closing was important for the
avoidance measurements, ice management, risk analysis focusing on injuries onboard client. SSPA modelled the bridge so that the
evaluate maritime risks and simulate vital passing vessels.
16 Highlights 58/2013 – City planning using the SEAMAN simulation tool
Linus Aldebjer
Project Manager.
He studied Engineering
Physics at Chalmers
University of Technology.
Previously he worked as
Software Architect at
Saab Underwater Systems, Motala,
Sweden. Since he was employed at SSPA
in January 2011, he has been leading the
work to upgrade SSPA’s simulation tool,
SEAMAN. He has also been involved in
various research projects developing route
optimisation and mathematical modeling.
Contact information
E-mail: linus.aldebjer@sspa.se
Johan Gahnström
Senior Project Manager
and Business Developer.
He has a B.Sc. Nautical
Science from 1987 and
65 scenarios were simulated, discussed by the pilots and SSPA’s manoeuvering experts, and then holds an unrestricted
graded for safety. This will help ensure that there will be fewer surprises once the bridge is actually built.
master license. Captain Gahnström recently
rejoined SSPA again after having started up
opening times were close to those in reality, which pilots and SSPA’s maneuvering experts, and then a new gas and chemical terminal as CEO/
enabled the previously described simulation to be graded for safety. This will help ensure that there harbor master. Previous experience range
carried out realistically. will be fewer surprises once the bridge is actually from setup of a new LNG terminal in Soyo,
built. Considering that the bridge is expected to Angola, work in Ras Laffan, Qatar and
last for 120 years, those days in the Seaman Swedish Maritime Administration. His
The results
simulator can be considered time well spent. background includes work with LNG, VTS,
What happened with the pilot and the malfunctio- marine piloting, management, ISPS and
ning bridge in the situation? The pilot successfully cargo control.
manoeuvered the ship to the bridge guard, from
which he could proceed once the bridge was Contact information
functioning again. The bridge design proved E-mail: johan.gahnstrom@sspa.se
sound, at least for this scenario. During the two
days when the simulations were conducted, 64
other scenarios were simulated, discussed by the
SSPA’s vision is to be recognised as the most rewarding partner for Our three focus areas are:
innovative and sustainable maritime development. To always offer the
• SSPA acts as a bridge between theory and practice, research and imple
latest knowledge and best practices, about 20 per cent of the compa-
mentation, the present and the future. The foundation is the ability to
ny’s resources are engaged in research and development. The Swedish
provide unbiased expertise, advice, and services to our customers and
government founded SSPA in 1940 and in 1984 it was established as the
other stakeholders.
limited company SSPA Sweden AB. The company has been owned by
the Foundation Chalmers University of Technology since 1994. • SSPA ensures sustainable development through proper risk management
in close cooperation with the customer.
SSPA offers a wide range of maritime services, including ship design,
• SSPA has the financial, environmental, human and technological factors
energy optimisation, finding the most effective ways to interact with
in mind for optimal energy efficiency.
other types of transportation, and conducting maritime infrastructure
studies together with safety and environmental risk assessments. Our Our head office is located in Gothenburg and we have a branch office
customers include shipowners, ports, shipyards, manufacturers and in Stockholm.
maritime authorities worldwide.