Kelly Isccs Analysis
Kelly Isccs Analysis
Kelly Isccs Analysis
Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Systems Bruce Kelly Nexant Inc., A Bechtel Technology & Consulting Company San Francisco, California Ulf Herrmann FLABEG Solar International GmbH Kln, Germany
Thermodynamic Benefit
Solar conversion efficiencies are higher than conventional plants, yet Brayton and Rankine cycle conditions remain unchanged Thermodynamic availability is improved by reducing temperature difference in heat transfer Largest Rankine cycle temperature differences occur in high pressure evaporator of the heat recovery steam generator
Thermodynamic Benefit
The most efficient use of solar energy is displacing saturated steam production Corollary: Sensible heat transfer has the smallest temperature differences; thus, the least efficient use of solar energy is feedwater preheating and steam superheating
Inherent Limits
If solar conversion efficiencies are to match or exceed SEGS plants, annual solar contributions are limited to 2 to 7 percent Annual contributions above 10 percent can be easily achieved without the use of thermal storage, but net solar-to-electric conversion efficiencies will be below 30 percent
Rankine cycle penalties during majority of operating hours can be very small
Design Recommendations
For F series gas turbines and 3 pressure heat recovery steam generators, solar thermal inputs should be limited to 100 to 300 percent of high pressure evaporator duty Thermal inputs to low pressure evaporator, intermediate pressure evaporator, feedwater preheater, superheater, and reheater are thermodynamically much less efficient
Design Recommendations
Variable pressure/variable temperature designs offer reasonable efficiencies, less complex operating procedures, reduced water consumption, and improved availability To maintain reasonable conversion efficiencies, solar contributions above 10 percent are best provided through the use of thermal storage