Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 100 views

    Case Problem LAWSUIT DEFENSE STRATEGY

    Uploaded by

    Harshit Gupta
    John Campbell is suing Doug Reynolds for $1.5 million after injuring his back falling from a rotten roof while working for Manhattan Construction. Allied Insurance must defend Reynolds. John offered to settle for $750,000. Allied is considering countering with $400,000, but thinks John has a strong case and may reject it and request a trial. Allied's lawyers analyzed John's possible reactions and three trial outcomes with associated probabilities. Allied will use this information to determine its strategy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Case Problem LAWSUIT DEFENSE STRATEGY

    Uploaded by

    Harshit Gupta
    100 views2 pages
    John Campbell is suing Doug Reynolds for $1.5 million after injuring his back falling from a rotten roof while working for Manhattan Construction. Allied Insurance must defend Reynolds. John offered to settle for $750,000. Allied is considering countering with $400,000, but thinks John has a strong case and may reject it and request a trial. Allied's lawyers analyzed John's possible reactions and three trial outcomes with associated probabilities. Allied will use this information to determine its strategy.

    Original Title

    Case Problem LAWSUIT DEFENSE STRATEGY

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    John Campbell is suing Doug Reynolds for $1.5 million after injuring his back falling from a rotten roof while working for Manhattan Construction. Allied Insurance must defend Reynolds. John offered to settle for $750,000. Allied is considering countering with $400,000, but thinks John has a strong case and may reject it and request a trial. Allied's lawyers analyzed John's possible reactions and three trial outcomes with associated probabilities. Allied will use this information to determine its strategy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    100 views2 pages

    Case Problem LAWSUIT DEFENSE STRATEGY

    Uploaded by

    Harshit Gupta
    John Campbell is suing Doug Reynolds for $1.5 million after injuring his back falling from a rotten roof while working for Manhattan Construction. Allied Insurance must defend Reynolds. John offered to settle for $750,000. Allied is considering countering with $400,000, but thinks John has a strong case and may reject it and request a trial. Allied's lawyers analyzed John's possible reactions and three trial outcomes with associated probabilities. Allied will use this information to determine its strategy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Case Problem LAWSUIT DEFENSE STRATEGY

    John Campbell, an employee of Manhattan Construction Company, claims to have injured his
    back as a result of a fall while repairing the roof at one of the Eastview apartment buildings. He
    has filed a lawsuit against Doug Reynolds, the owner of Eastview Apartments, asking for
    damages of $1,500,000. John claims that the roof had rotten sections and that this fall could have
    been prevented if Mr. Reynolds had told Manhattan Construction about the problem. Mr.
    Reynolds has notified his insurance company, Allied Insurance, of the lawsuit. Allied must
    defend Mr. Reynolds and decide what action to take regarding the lawsuit.

    Some depositions have been taken, and a series of discussions have taken place between both
    sides. As a result, John Campbell has offered to accept a settlement of $750,000. Thus, one
    option is for Allied to pay John $750,000 to settle the claim. Allied is also considering making
    John a counteroffer of $400,000 in the hope that he will accept a lesser amount to avoid the time
    and cost of going to trial. But Allied’s preliminary investigation has shown that John has a strong
    case; Allied is concerned that John may reject their counteroffer and request a jury trial. Allied’s
    lawyers have spent some time exploring John’s likely reaction if they make a counteroffer of
    $400,000.

    The lawyers have concluded that it is adequate to consider three possible outcomes to represent
    John’s possible reaction to a counteroffer of $400,000: (1) John will accept the counteroffer and
    the case will be closed; (2) John will reject the counteroffer and elect to have a jury decide the
    settlement amount; or (3) John will make a counteroffer to Allied of $600,000. If John does
    make a counteroffer, Allied has decided that they will not make additional counteroffers. They
    will either accept John’s counteroffer of 600,000 or go to trial.

    If the case goes to a jury trial, Allied has decided that it should be adequate to consider three
    possible outcomes: (1) the jury may reject John’s claim and Allied will not be required to pay
    any damages; (2) the jury will find in favor of John and award him $750,000 in damages; or (3)
    the jury will conclude that John has a strong case and award him the full amount that he sued for,
    $1,500,000.
    Key considerations as Allied develops its strategy for disposing of the case are the probabilities
    associated with John’s response to an Allied counteroffer of $400,000, and the probabilities
    associated with the three possible trial outcomes. Allied’s lawyers believe the probability that
    John will accept a counteroffer of $400,000 is 0.10, the probability that John will reject a
    counteroffer of $400,000 is 0.40, and the probability that John will, himself, make a counteroffer
    to Allied of $600,000 is 0.50. If the case goes to court, they believe that the probability the jury
    will award John damages of $1,500,000 is 0.30, the probability that the jury will award John
    damages of $750,000 is 0.50, and the probability that the jury will award John nothing is 0.20.

    Managerial Report

    Perform an analysis of the problem facing Allied Insurance and prepare a report that summarizes
    your findings and recommendations. Be sure to include the following items:

    1. A decision tree
    2. A recommendation regarding whether Allied should accept John’s initial offer to settle
    the claim for $750,000
    3. A decision strategy that Allied should follow if they decide to make John a counteroffer
    of $400,000
    4. A risk profile for your recommended strategy.

    You might also like