Assignment - Management Accounting
Assignment - Management Accounting
Cost Accounting is all about the Cost and it includes things like Cost control, Cost
computation and Cost reduction. Whereas Management Accounting is about managing
the organization and making effective decisions.
Cost Accounting has a narrow scope whereas Management Accounting has much broader
scope.
Cost Accounting helps the Business in preventing irrelevant spending which sometimes
goes beyond the budget. Whereas Management Accounting gives an idea about how
Management should strategize.
Cost Accounting is quantitative in nature whereas Management Accounting is both
quantitative and qualitative in nature.
Cost Accounting is used for shareholders, Management and vendors whereas
Management Accounting is only used for Management of the Business.
(2) BEP Chart, Assumptions of BEP Analysis
Hence it is also known as “cost-volume-profit analysis”. It helps to know the operating condition
that exists when a company ‘breaks-even’, that is when sales reach a point equal to all expenses
incurred in attaining that level of sales.
(i) The total costs may be classified into fixed and variable costs. It ignores semi-variable cost.
(v) The fixed costs remain constant over the volume under consideration.
Marginal cost of a product represents the minimum price for that product and any sale below the
marginal cost would entail a cash loss. The price for the product should be fixed at a level which
not only covers the marginal cost but also makes a reasonable contribution towards the common
fund to cover fixed overheads. The fixation of such a price for a product would be easier if its
marginal cost and overall profitability of the concern is known.
The industry has to cut prices of its products from time to time on account of competition,
government regulations and other compelling reasons. The contribution per unit on account of
such cutting is reduced while the industry is interested in maintaining a minimum level of its
profits. In case the demand for the company’s products is elastic, the minimum level of profits
can be maintained by pushing up the sales. The volume of such sales can be found out by the
marginal costing technique.
Sometimes prices have to be fixed below the total cost of the product. This becomes necessary to
meet the situation arising during trade depression. It will be enough in such periods if the
marginal cost is recovered. The selling price may be fixed at a level above this cost though it
may not be enough to cover the total cost. This is because in such periods any marginal
contribution towards recovery of fixed cost is good enough rather than not to have any
contribution at all.
A price less than the total cost but above marginal cost may be acceptable when a specific order
has been received and it shall not affect the home market. The additional sales revenue should be
compared with the additional costs (which are only marginal costs generally) and if the net
revenue is greater, the order should be accepted. In case the market is competitive and there is a
fear of adverse impact on existing sales in the long run, the decision should be taken after careful
study.
(4) Explain: Fixed Budget & Flexible Budget & Master
Budget
Fixed Budget
Definition: A fixed budget, also called a static budget, is financial plan based on the assumption
of selling specific amounts of goods during a period. In other words, fixed budgets are based on
a set volume of sales or revenues. This is an easy way for management to plan out expenses and
operations when they assume that sales volume and total revenues will be a set amount during a
period.
There are, however, many shortfalls to using a fixed budget. For example, management’s
estimates of revenues are rarely accurate. It’s extremely difficult to predict future demand and
growth of an industry; so predicted values rarely match the actual numbers for a period.
Unfortunately, if the predicted numbers are not accurate enough, evaluations of performance,
capacity, and profits can’t be used to compare the actual results with the budgeted expectations.
Example
For example, some industries rarely change and customer demand has been the same for the past
10 years. Companies in this type of industry can reliability use a set volume amount based on
prior periods and still maintain accuracy.
Flexible Budget
A flexible budget adjusts to changes in actual revenue levels. Actual revenues or other
activity measures are entered into the flexible budget once an accounting period has been
completed, and it generates a budget that is specific to the inputs. The budget is then
compared to actual expenses for control purposes. The steps needed to construct a flexible
budget are:
1. Identify all fixed costs and segregate them in the budget model.
2. Determine the extent to which all variable costs change as activity measures change.
3. Create the budget model, where fixed costs are “hard coded” into the model, and variable
costs are stated as a percentage of the relevant activity measures or as a cost per unit of
activity measure.
4. Enter actual activity measures into the model after an accounting period has been
completed. This updates the variable costs in the flexible budget.
5. Enter the resulting flexible budget for the completed period into the accounting system for
comparison to actual expenses.
This approach varies from the more common static budget, which contains nothing but fixed
amounts that do not vary with actual revenue levels. Budget versus actual reports under a
flexible budget tend to yield variances that are much more relevant than those generated
under a static budget, since both the budgeted and actual expenses are based on the same
activity measure. This means that the variances will likely be smaller than under a static
budget, and will also be highly actionable.
A flexible budget can be created that ranges in level of sophistication. Several variations on
the concept are noted below. In short, a flexible budget gives a company a tool for
comparing actual to budgeted performance at many levels of activity.
Basic Flexible Budget
At its simplest, the flexible budget alters those expenses that vary directly with revenues.
There is typically a percentage built into the model that is multiplied by actual revenues to
arrive at what expenses should be at a stated revenue level. In the case of the cost of goods
sold, a cost per unit may be used, rather than a percentage of sales.
Some expenditures vary with other activity measures than revenue. For example, telephone
expenses may vary with changes in headcount. If so, one can integrate these other activity
measures into the flexible budget model.
Expenditures may only vary within certain ranges of revenue or other activities; outside of
those ranges, a different proportion of expenditures may apply. A sophisticated flexible
budget will change the proportions for these expenditures if the measurements they are
based on exceed their target ranges.
The flexible budget is an appealing concept. Several advantages are noted below.
The flexible budget is especially useful in businesses where costs are closely aligned
with the level of business activity, such as a retail environment where overhead can
be segregated and treated as a fixed cost, while the cost of merchandise is directly
linked to revenues.
Performance Measurement
Master Budget
The master budget is the aggregation of all lower-level budgets produced by a company's
various functional areas, and also includes budgeted financial statements, a cash forecast,
and a financing plan. The master budget is typically presented in either a monthly or
quarterly format, and usually covers a company's entire fiscal year. An explanatory text may
be included with the master budget, which explains the company's strategic direction, how
the master budget will assist in accomplishing specific goals, and the management actions
needed to achieve the budget. There may also be a discussion of the headcount changes that
are required to achieve the budget.
A master budget is the central planning tool that a management team uses to direct the
activities of a corporation, as well as to judge the performance of its various responsibility
centers. It is customary for the senior management team to review a number of iterations of
the master budget and incorporate modifications until it arrives at a budget that allocates
funds to achieve the desired results. Hopefully, a company uses participative budgeting to
arrive at this final budget, but it may also be imposed on the organization by senior
management, with little input from other employees.
Production budget
Sales budget
Once the master budget has been finalized, the accounting staff may enter it into the
company's accounting software, so that the software can issue financial reports comparing
budgeted and actual results.
Smaller organizations usually construct their master budgets using electronic spreadsheets.
However, spreadsheets may contain formula errors, and also have a difficult time
constructing a budgeted balance sheet. Larger organizations use budget-specific software,
which does not have these two problems.
When a company implements a master budget, there is a strong tendency for senior
management to force the organization to closely adhere to it by including budget goals in
employee compensation plans. Doing so has the following effects:
When compiling the budget, employees tend to estimate low sales and high expenses, so
that they can easily meet the budget and achieve their compensation plans.
Forcing the organization to follow the budget requires a group of financial analysts who
track down and report on variances from the plan. This adds unnecessary overhead expense
to the business.
Managers tend to ignore new business opportunities, because all resources are already
allocated toward attaining the budget, and their personal incentives are tied to the budget.
Thus, enforcing a master budget can skew the operational performance of a business.
Because of this problem, it may be better to employ the master budget as just a rough
guideline for management's near-term expectations for the business.
(5) Explain: Net Present Value & I.R.R.
Net Present Value (NPV) is the value of all future cash flows (positive and negative) over the
entire life of an investment discounted to the present. NPV analysis is a form of intrinsic
valuation and is used extensively across finance and accounting for determining the value of a
business, investment security, capital project, new venture, cost reduction program, and anything
that involves cash flow.
NPV Formula
Where:
NPV analysis is used to help determine how much an investment, project, or any series of cash
flows is worth. It is an all-encompassing metric, as it takes into account all revenues, expenses,
and capital costs associated with an investment in its Free Cash Flow (FCF).
In addition to factoring all revenues and costs, it also takes into account the timing of each cash
flow that can result in a large impact on the present value of an investment. For example, it’s
better to see cash inflows sooner and cash outflows later, compared to the opposite.
Why Are Cash Flows Discounted?
The cash flows in net present value analysis are discounted for two main reasons, (1) to adjust
for the risk of an investment opportunity, and (2) to account for the time value of money (TVM).
If the net present value of a project or investment, is negative it means the expected rate of return
that will be earned on it is less than the discount rate (required rate of return or hurdle rate). This
doesn’t necessarily mean the project will “lose money.” It may very well generate accounting
profit (net income), but since the rate of return generated is less than the discount rate, it is
considered to destroy value. If the NPV is positive, it creates value.
While net present value (NPV) is the most commonly used method for evaluating investment
opportunities, it does have some drawbacks that should be carefully considered.
Introduction
The internal rate of return (IRR) is a discounting cash flow technique which gives a rate of return
earned by a project. The internal rate of return is the discounting rate where the total of initial
cash outlay and discounted cash inflows are equal to zero. In other words, it is the discounting
rate at which the net present value (NPV) is equal to zero.
For the computation of the internal rate of return, we use the same formula as NPV. To derive
the IRR, an analyst has to rely on trial and error method and cannot use analytical methods. With
automation, various software (like Microsoft Excel) is also available to calculate IRR. In Excel,
there is a financial function that uses cash flows at regular intervals for calculation.
The rate at which the cost of investment and the present value of future cash flows match will be
considered as the ideal rate of return. A project that can achieve this is a profitable project. In
other words, at this rate the cash outflows and the present value of inflows are equal, making the
project attractive.
How is IRR used for capital budgeting?
If the same costs apply for different projects, then the project with the highest IRR will be
selected. If an organization needs to choose between multiple investment options wherein the
cost of investment remains constant, then IRR will be used to rank the projects and select the
most profitable one. Ideally, the IRR higher than the cost of capital is selected.
In real life scenarios, since the investment in any project will be huge and will have a long-term
effect, an organization uses a combination of various techniques of capital budgeting like NPV,
IRR and payback period to select the best project.
What are the shortcomings of the method?
As mentioned earlier, IRR is widely used and adopted by many companies in combination with
other techniques for capital budgeting. However, this method has some shortcomings.
IRR does not take into consideration the duration of the project.
Example, if the company has to choose between two projects – Project A with IRR 15%
and duration is one year and Project B with IRR 20% and project duration is 5 years and
the cost of capital of the company is 10% – both the projects are profitable. If the
company selects Project B because it has a higher IRR it would be incorrect as the
duration of Project B is longer.
IRR assumes that the cash flows are reinvested at the same rate as the project, instead of
the cost of capital. Hence, IRR may not give a true picture of the profitability.
(6) Responsibility Acoounting
This center consists of individuals responsible only for cost control. A person responsible for a
particular cost center is held accountable only for controllable expenses. Therefore, it is essential
to differentiate this center’s controllable and uncontrollable costs. The performance of each
center is evaluated by comparing the actual vs targeted price.
#2 – Revenue Center
The revenue center takes care of revenue, with the company’s sales teams being mainly
responsible.
#3 – Profit Center
A profit center refers to a center whose performance is measured in cost and revenue. Generally,
the company’s factory is treated as a profit center where raw material consumption is a cost and
finished product sold to other departments is revenue.
#4 – Investment Center
A manager responsible for this center is responsible for utilizing the company’s assets in the best
manner to earn a good return on capital employed.
Advantages of Responsibility Accounting
Conclusion
The responsibility accounting system is a mechanism by which costs and revenue are
accumulated and reported to the top management to make an effective decision. In addition, it
gives freedom to individuals to amplify their skills to reduce the cost and increase the
organization’s revenue.