Music Theory - From Beginner To Expert - The Ultimate Step-By-Step Guide To Understanding and Learning Music Theory Effortlessly (With Audio Examples Book 1) (PDFDrive)
Music Theory - From Beginner To Expert - The Ultimate Step-By-Step Guide To Understanding and Learning Music Theory Effortlessly (With Audio Examples Book 1) (PDFDrive)
Music Theory - From Beginner To Expert - The Ultimate Step-By-Step Guide To Understanding and Learning Music Theory Effortlessly (With Audio Examples Book 1) (PDFDrive)
This document is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. It is geared toward providing
exact and reliable information in regard to the covered topic. The presentation of the
information is without contract or any type of guarantee assurance.
Except for the quotation of small passages for the purposes of criticism or review, no part of
this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or
by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, without
the permission in writing of the author.
guitaryourday.com
Third edition
Cover by Emir @Pulp Studio
Cheat Sheet
Introduction
* * *
The aim of this book is to help you learn music theory in a structured way that is
easy to follow and understand. Music theory is universal and applies to all
instruments. Since piano is music theory heavily oriented instrument (one can
play as much as 10 notes simultaneously) all key concepts are usually best
explained on a piano keyboard — which I will do whenever there is something
important to demonstrate visually. So don’t worry if you’re not a piano player,
you’ll see just how applicable music theory is on any instrument and why it is an
essential means of communication between all kinds of musicians.
www.amazon.com/dp/B071J4HNR5
With this book you’ll easily learn the fundamentals of the notation system and
key signatures, clefs, staff elements, notes, how rhythms are written, solfege and
much more. There are also progressive exercises at the end in which you’ll be
required to apply everything you’ve learned in the book and actually sightread a
musical piece. It will also be very exciting to see how it all relates to what you
learn here and how many concepts complement each other.
Music as a Language
It is sometimes useful to think of music as a calculus, as a rigid system of
numerical relationships. It seems, when you think about the fact that everything
reduces to intervals and their relations, that fundamentally music theory is
mathematical. It is sometimes useful, but it isn’t entirely accurate to think about
music that way.
Music isn’t a calculus, music isn’t an abstract system of numbers, music is an
expression. It is creative in the same way that painting a portrait is creative, and
the difference between creative musical meaning and representing music
mathematically is the difference between painting deeply and creatively and
painting by numbers.
All of this is to say that music isn’t math, music is a language. And just like our
ordinary language, it is messy, subtle, complicated, expressive, nuanced and
sometimes difficult. There are things you can learn, rules if you like, that make
up the grammar of music. This is the system of notes, intervals, scales, chords
(which we will learn in this book), etc. But to make use of theory it is always
important to remember the way language works — you can’t learn a language by
learning a set of rules, you have to learn it by immersing yourself in it and
getting a sense of its practices.
To understand music as a language means to always make theory come alive,
never to let it sit and become stale. To live it and practice it by listening, playing,
singing, expressing, writing and thinking it. Intervals are only as good as the real
notes that compose them, and music is only as good as the linguistic expressions
that it comprises.
In Part 1 of this book we will setup the fundamental framework that constitutes
music language, namely notes and intervals.
In Parts 2 and 3 we’ll see how notes and intervals are used to create more
complicated structures, such as scales and chords.
Just like a language music doesn’t happen without time, which is why Part 4 is all
about time and rhythm, and how to understand this crucial component of music.
In Parts 5 and 6 you will learn about the types of harmony, how to approach
composing and manipulating musical structures, and how to be more expressive
musically—which goes beyond merely playing the notes or chords.
Finally, in Part 7 we will dive deep into harmony and examine some advanced
musical concepts that will give you a grander perspective about the wide scope of
music, and the possibilities you may not have even considered or knew they exist.
Notes in Music
When we see music as a language it is easy to realize that the notes in music are
like the alphabet of a language. The notes are simply the foundation of all music.
There are only 12 notes in Western music, which is historically derived from the
European music and is by far the most common music system that we hear
today. There are other music “systems” out there, like Indian, African, Chinese
and other traditional folk music, which are all different and make use of different
scales.
The 12 notes in Western music are as follows:
A, A# or Bb, B, C, C# or Db, D, D# or Eb, E, F, F# or Gb, G, G# or Ab
Here are those notes laid out on a piano keyboard:
In previous section it was mentioned that the term ‘tone’ is sometimes used as a
name for a particular music interval. This is that case—oftentimes the term
semitone (S) is used instead of the half-step, and tone (T) instead of the whole
step. These are just different names for the same thing. Half-steps or semitones
are equal to the distance from one piano key to the next, or one fret on guitar to
the next (which is why there are 12 keys or 12 frets per octave on those
instruments).
Whenever you’re moving clockwise on the note circle (from left to right on
piano keyboard), you are ascending and the notes are becoming higher in pitch.
That’s the situation in which we would use ‘#’ symbol; for example, we would
use C# instead of Db to indicate that we’re ascending.
On the opposite, whenever you’re moving counter-clockwise (from right to left
on piano) the notes are becoming lower in pitch and hence we would use ‘b’
symbol — Db instead of C#, to indicate that we’re descending.
Figure 3: An octave with the middle C is called the Middle octave—it’s the 4th octave on a full
size piano keyboard
You may have seen before a note with a number next to it and wondered what
that number means. Unless we’re talking about a particular chord, that number
tells us what kind of registry range the note is in. Looking at the figure 4, you
can see that there are eight C notes on piano, and this number (1-8) tells us
exactly which C to play (in what registry/octave range). Same goes for any other
note; for example, D3 means that this D note is in the C3-C4 range, or the third
range. This is especially important when writing down music using notation
because it determines what kind of clefs we will use to best cover the range of a
piece, and minimize the use of ledger lines (this is explained thoroughly in How
to Read Music for Beginners book).
Octave Subdivision
One octave consists of 6 whole steps, one step consists of 2 half-steps, and one
half-step consists of up to 100 cents. What that means is that, for example, D
and D# are one half-step apart but between them there are up to 100 cents. Cents
in music are typically used to express microtones, which are very small
intervals—smaller than a half-step (which you can also call a semitone).
Figure 4: Most software programs that work with sound files allow you to change the pitch in
octaves, semitones and even cents
Beyond one semitone, rather than using hertz as a frequency measure unit
(which if you remember shows the amount of air pressure waves produced in a
given amount of time), we more often use cents which are a logarithmic measure
used for musical intervals. It is enough to say that they are simply more
convenient and easier to use for musicians. Human ear is very sensitive as it can
recognize up to only a few cent difference between two successive notes
(pitches), but the interval of one cent is too small to be heard between two
successive notes.
Your instrument can be in tune and still sound a little bit off, and that’s the case
when there’s a small pitch difference that can only be measured in cents.
Correcting these small differences is sometimes called fine-tuning and the tuners
that you can find today allow for this kind of super-accurate tuning (with even
less than one cent accuracy). The more “exactly” in tune your instrument is, the
better it will sound, especially on the recording. That’s why it is important to
keep it in tune.
We’ve now covered the notes and the note circle. Before we dive any further, it
is essential that you understand and learn the intervals in music.
1. Major
2. minor
3. Perfect
Major and minor intervals are used a lot in Western music, while Perfect
intervals are generally used more in ethnic music all around the world.
1. First we have C to C.
Yes, there’s an interval between the Root and the Root (the exact same note played
two times), and it’s called Perfect Unison.
2. The next note, C#/Db, is a minor 2nd above C (and also a major 7th below it). This is
also the equivalent of one semitone (S).
3. D is a Major 2nd above C (and a minor 7th below). Also the equivalent of one tone
(T).
4. D#/Eb is a minor 3rd above C (and a major 6th below).
5. E is a Major 3rd above C (and a minor 6th below).
6. F is a Perfect 4th above C (and a Perfect 5th below).
Fourths and fifths are said to be “perfect” rather than major or minor because they
are the same in the major and minor scales, as well as most other diatonic scales
(don’t worry if you don’t understand this right now).
7. F#/Gb is Augmented 4th — also called a Tritone — above C (and a Tritone below
it). Or diminished 5th
This is a strange interval. It is highly dissonant and often avoided. It sometimes
functions as a sharp 4th, and other times it is a flat 5th. The tritone is also the only
interval that is the inversion of itself — if a note is a tritone up from another note,
then it is a tritone down from it as well. Tritone is three tones away from the root
1. Ascending (lower note in pitch going to a higher note, for example C to D#)
2. Descending (higher note in pitch going to a lower note; for example, B to Ab)
3. Harmonic (when two or more notes are played simultaneously)
4. Played in Unison (the same note played twice)
You can say that B is a Major 3rd interval up from G, but that Eb is a Major third
down from G. So that means that intervals can be inverted — if B is a Major 3rd
up from G, then it is also a different interval — in this case, a minor 6th — down
from the G of the next octave.
In this way, intervals come in pairs. Every relationship can be defined by two
different intervals, one up and one down. That should explain the intervals in
parenthesis from the intervals list.
To explain it further, interval is a relative property of notes. For example, we
want to figure out what interval it is from A to C. We have 2 possible solutions.
C note is a particular interval away from A. If the C note is higher in pitch than
A, then this interval is ascending. So we can say that C is a minor 3rd up from A,
and that C is A’s minor 3rd interval. Because it is a semitone away
Understanding intervals — truly understanding them and how they relate to one
another and learning to hear and use them — takes a lifetime. In a sense, all of
the other learning about scales and keys and chords is a way to make sense of the
wide-open space of the network of intervals in the 12-tone system. It is very well
worth always keeping an eye on your comfort level with this idea and training
your ear to recognize them.
1. Harmony,
2. Melody and
3. Rhythm.
Harmony and melody both describe the relationship between pitches (although
differently) without respect to their duration, whereas rhythm describes the
relationship between sounds and their durations without respect to their pitches.
Harmony is what happens when we combine notes in music. If you add one or
more notes to another note, and you play them at the same time or in a sequence,
then you’ve added harmony to the original note. This is one way to think about
the harmony.
Harmony is the vertical relationship between pitches. It is a structure, like a
lattice; a network. When you understand the relationship between two or more
notes harmonically, you are treating them as though they were happening at the
same time (even if they are happening one after another). It is possible in this
way to think about the way the overall harmonic structure of a piece moves and
changes. Harmony is the thing that most people mean when they talk about
theory.
Melody is like harmony in that it describes the relationship between pitches, but
it is a horizontal rather than vertical understanding. While still a matter of
relative structure, melody is all about the way that notes act in sequence, so that
the same 4 notes played in different orders have different melodic values, even if
those 4 notes taken together might have the same harmonic structure.
Melody could be considered simply as part of the harmony which focuses on
how notes sound together in a sequence. Usually we add harmony to a melody
line (which puts the melody in a certain context and makes it sound richer), or
we may add melody to the existing harmony.
Rhythm is the relationship, in time, between notes (or sounds in general)
regardless of pitch relationships. Rhythm describes the way sounds pulse (or
don’t pulse), their speed and regularity. Rhythmic structures describe the way a
piece moves according to a particular kind of time-based division. While not
generally the focus of as much theoretical attention, rhythm is equally as
important. An understanding of the role of time and duration in music is
essential since music is, after all, a time-based art form. That’s why there is a
whole section dedicated to rhythm in this book.
Mastering
Scales and Modes
Types of Scales
There are basically only a few types of scales. One of them we have just covered
— the chromatic scale. The chromatic scale is the set of all other scales. It is the
master scale. But it doesn’t define a distinct harmonic space beyond the division
of harmony into 12 equal parts. For that, you need scales with fewer than 12
notes in them.
Commonly, there are 2 other scale types that make the foundation of harmony,
and those 2 types break up into a few others.
1. First, there are 5-note scales. These are called “pentatonic” scales, meaning “5-per-
octave.” The variations of those simple scales are enough to produce a rich landscape
all by themselves. While there are a variety of different note patterns that can make
up pentatonic scales, there is one in particular, which define the minor pentatonic
scale as well as the major pentatonic scale, that is most often used.
These scales are found in blues and rock music, and variations of those simple scales
are enough to produce a rich landscape all by themselves. There’s a reason why
they’re called “minor” and “major” and it’s because they originate from the 7-note
scales that bear the same name.
There are also other pentatonic scales, especially in non-western music, which are
rarer but still sometimes useful. For example, Chinese scale used to compose
traditional Chinese folk music is a pentatonic (5-note) scale.
2. Then there are 7-note scales. 7-note scales have many forms, the most basic of which
are called “diatonic scales” (more on this later). The most common Major scale
(do-re-me…) and Natural minor scale are both 7-note diatonic scales.
The words “minor” and “major” refer to something like the mood of the scale, with
minor scales in general sounding sad, dark and thoughtful and major scales in
general sounding happy, bright, and lively (like minor and major chords).
Most blues, for instance, is played in a minor key, which means that it makes use of a
minor scale quite often, whereas most pop is played in a major key, which means it
makes use of a major scale.
There are two other varieties of 7-note scales that are used in classical music,
neo-classical, advanced rock, and jazz, and they are the harmonic minor scale
and the melodic minor scale (and their variations).
Beyond 5-note and 7-note scales, there are a few specialized 8-note jazz scales
(called bebop scales). Otherwise, it is always possible to produce new scales by
adding notes from the chromatic scale to an existing scale, resulting in scales
with as many as 11 notes (this is most often done in jazz).
It is also possible to create new scales by altering an existing scale
chromatically. In general, creating new scales by this chromatic alteration and/or
addition results in what we call “synthetic” scales or modes.
Keep in mind that there are 12 notes in music, so there are 12 harmonic centers
(or root notes) that a scale can start on. This goes for any kind of scale no matter
the number of notes it contains.
Minor Pentatonic Scale
While there are many different kinds of pentatonic scales that can be assembled,
there is really only one pentatonic structure that is used commonly in western
music. This structure has 2 variations in particular that are ubiquitous in blues,
rock, pop, country, jazz and bluegrass. Those two scales are the minor pentatonic
(which is the most familiar) and the major pentatonic.
The minor pentatonic scale is the foundation of most of the blues and rock that
most of us have heard. It is a simple, easy to remember scale with a very distinct
sound. It connotes a soulful, deep affect and can be made to sound quite sad.
This scale consists of notes that are all found in the natural minor scale, and so it
is of use any time the minor scale is called for.
It is possible to make an entire career out of this one harmonic collection, as
many blues, folk, bluegrass, funk and rock musicians have. Outside of the
Western world, this and similar scales are common in traditional Asian and
African music (the latter being the historical source of the minor pentatonic scale
in the American Folk tradition).
*NOTE: These are the 5 notes of the minor pentatonic scales. The distance between the last
note (the minor 7th) and the first note in the next octave is one full step.
Now check what is underlined above. These distances (intervals) can be used to
describe the scale in another, simpler, way:
WH W W WH W
or (same thing)
TS T T TS T
This is called a scale formula. In this case it’s the minor pentatonic scale
formula. A scale formula simply represents a unique set of intervals found
within each scale. It is written by using tones and semitones (and a combination
of the two — TS).
Just by knowing a scale formula you can start on any of the 12 notes on any
instrument, apply the formula, and easily figure out how to play any scale.
When put in context:
R — TS — minor 3rd — T — Perfect 4th — T — Perfect 5th —
— TS — minor 7th — T — R
For example, if we start from an A note we can then apply the formula: TS — T
— T — TS — T, and easily figure out the rest of the notes of the A minor
pentatonic scale. The notes would be:
A — TS — C — T — D — T — E — TS — G — T — A
A is the Root
C is the minor 3rd (above A)
D is the Perfect 4th (above A)
E is the Perfect 5th (above A)
G is the minor 7th (above A)
and lastly A is the Perfect 8th — Octave (O)
When applying a scale formula you can follow the note circle to find out the
notes easier.
What Is a Mode?
It is worth using the minor pentatonic scale to demonstrate an important concept.
We saw that this scale consists of a collection of 5 notes, and that when they are
oriented around the root, there is a particular set of intervals that define the scale.
But what if we take those same exact 5 notes — for instance, the A minor
pentatonic scale (A, C, D, E and G) — and re-orient them. In other words,
what if rather than calling A the root, we treat this same collection of notes as a
C scale, treating C as the root.
Now the notes have different names:
What we have created by re-orienting the scale is called a “mode”. We can say
that the major pentatonic scale is a mode of the minor pentatonic scale, or that
the minor pentatonic scale is a mode of the major pentatonic scale (we usually
say the major pentatonic is derived from the minor pentatonic because it is the
most used one in virtually all blues and rock).
So major pentatonic scale is derived from the minor pentatonic structure, only it
begins on what was the 2nd note of the minor pentatonic.
Like the minor pentatonic scale, the major pentatonic scale is simple and
recognizable, and most of us know it without realizing it. Because of the
different set of intervals, this scale sounds different — it has a brighter, happier
sound than its minor cousin, which is a result of the fact it being a “major” scale.
The notes of the major pentatonic scale are all contained in the major scale, and
so it is useful whenever that scale can be used.
Because there are 5 notes in the minor pentatonic scale, there are 5 different
notes that can act as the root of different modes. For each note in the collection,
there is a different mode, in which that note is the root and the 4 other notes are
defined with respect to it, resulting in 5 different sets of intervals with each note.
This is a very basic understanding of modes. As your understanding and
application in playing deepens, you will start seeing them as completely separate
scales rather than simple note re-orientations of the parent scales (that’s why you
can sometimes use the terms ‘scale’ and ‘mode’ interchangeably).
On a deeper level, modes show the relationships between chords and scales, and
they are completely relative to the chords that are playing underneath in the
background, or on the backing track. This concept will be extremely
important when it comes to 7-note scales, But first, let’s tackle the minor
pentatonic scale modes.
1. Scale tones played up and down (starting and ending on the Root note) — this will
help to establish the scale’s tonal center in our ears.
2. A series of chords that belong to that scale. Since at this point in the book you may
not be familiar with how chords are built and generated by scales, just focus on the
sound of the chords, and notice how everything relates to the first chord that is
played. After you go through the chord section later in the book you can come back
to these scale audios again and it will be clear why those chords are played.
3. An improvisation excerpt over a drone note (a note, usually a low bass note, that is
sustained or is constantly sounding throughout the excerpt in the background). The
following example will be in A, so we’ll be using A note as the drone note over
which we’ll be playing scale tones for each mode separately, in a musical way
(improvise basically).
Hearing, distinguishing and using modes is a process that will take some time,
but once you do it, most of the things in theory will start to make much more
sense, the dots will be connected, and it will make you a much better musician.
So be patient and take your time with this. Let’s get to the modes.
Minor Pentatonic Mode 1 – Minor
Pentatonic Scale
The first mode of the minor pentatonic scale is just the minor pentatonic scale. It
consists of a:
Root, minor 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, minor 7th
In A, the scale is: A, C, D, E, G. Here’s how this scale, or mode 1, sounds:
Minor Pentatonic Scale Mode 1 audio example in A -> http://goo.gl/ixb9BQ
Pay close attention how each of the notes played sound against the backing
drone note. Some will add tension, some will feel more pleasant and some will
provide resolution.
Try to do this for modes 4 and 5 by yourself when we get to them, it will be a
nice little mental workout.
Now again, D minor pentatonic mode 3 is relative mode to the A minor
pentatonic because they share the same notes, and A minor pentatonic is its
parent scale. But since our backing drone note is still A (in the audio example),
in order to hear the characteristic sound of this mode we need to use minor
pentatonic mode 3 in A.
So we just take the mode 3’s interval structure with the scale formula and apply
it starting from the A note again. This will give us the following notes:
A(R) – T – B(M2) – TS – D(P4) – T – E(P5) – TS – G(m7) – T – A(O)
Playing this set of notes and intervals in A, over the A backing drone note will
give us the sound of the mode 3 of the minor pentatonic scale.
Minor Pentatonic Mode 3 audio example in A -> http://goo.gl/1aQJcV
If you want a good workout you can try to fill out this table in a different key,
for example C (you would start with C as the Root note in the top left corner).
Table 3: Minor Pentatonic Interval Comparison
Notice on Table 3 how notes and their functions change with different modes.
Notice for example how modes 2 and 5 are similar — Mode 2 has a Major 3rd (3)
and Mode 5 has Perfect 4th (4). Look for patterns and notice the differences.
We will now move on to 7-note scales, but first...
The distance between the 7th note and the first note of the next octave is a half-
step, and the overall structure of the scale (you can also say ‘scale formula’) is:
whole, whole, half, whole, whole, whole, half
W W H W W W H
or:
Tone, Tone, Semitone, Tone, Tone, Tone, Semitone
T T S T T T S
Figure 7: Major scale structure
So we have:
R — T — M2 — T — M3 — S — P4 — T — P5 —
— T — M6 — T — M7 — S — R (Octave)
This is the form of all diatonic scales (only since they’re modes of each other
they begin at different points in the structure).
Each scale has a starting note — called the Root note (R), which gives the scale
its name. Root note can be any of the 12 notes from the note circle.
If we say: “In the key of A major” (or you can just say “in A”, if it’s a major
key), it means we use A note as the root note and then apply from it the major
scale structure (T T S T T T S).
So “in A” the notes would be:
A — T — B — T — C# — S — D — T — E — T — F# — T — G# — S — A
Notice the similarities between this A minor scale and its relative major — C
major scale (It’s the same structure only the notes are re-oriented so that now A
is the starting note). Because of this, key of A minor is also without sharps or
flats. This goes for any mode of the C major key.
Also notice the similarities between this minor scale and minor pentatonic and
major and major pentatonic scale. Can you figure out which notes are left out?
Refer to the scale comparison chart should you have any trouble with this.
As an exercise you can try to figure out the relative minor scales of the following
major keys: G, D, A, E, B, F.
There are 12 notes in music, so there must be 12 Major scales — each starting
from a different note, right? Well, yes, but in music theory it’s not that simple.
We have to deal with both #’s and b’s.
In order to fill out the entire table correctly you have to follow a simple rule in
music theory which says that there can’t be two side by side notes with the
same name. In other words, you need to have each letter of the alphabet in a
scale key only once, and you just add #’s or b’s as necessary. A good practice
when figuring out the notes of a scale then is to first just write out the alphabet
letters from the starting note.
Let’s check out the key of A# as an example – a purely theoretical key and a
hard one to figure out. One tone after A# is C, one tone after C is D, and one
semitone after D is D#, etc. But we can’t have A# – C – D – D# because this
breaks the rule: B letter is missing and two D’s are side by side. That’s why we
use double sharps (or flats for flat keys) and we write this key in the following
way:
A# — T — B# — T — C## — S — D# — T — E# — T — F## — T — G## — S — A#
On the table the first 7-8 keys are very commonly used in music. I’ve left the
theoretical keys like A# for you as a challenge and practice. Try to figure them
out and you’ll gain a much better understanding of major scale keys.
Note that for the keys starting on a note with sharp (#) you would use #’s, and if
the key starts on a note with flat (b), you need to use b’s. I’ve provided a
complete list of all notes in all keys at the end of this book so that you can
double check your work.
Relative Modes
Relative modes are what most of us think about when we think about “the
modes”, and it is the way the modes have been presented thus far. Relative
modes are scales that contain all of the same notes but begin at different
places. C major and A minor are relative scales, same as G major and E minor.
Coming back to the minor pentatonic modes, it was said that all of the modes of
the minor pentatonic are relative to one another because they share the same
notes, as we’ve seen: for example, A minor pentatonic and C major pentatonic
are relative scales, same as the mode 3 of A minor pentatonic in D and A minor
pentatonic, and so on.
Relative modes are useful when extending the range of a piece up or down the
harmonic space, on a guitar fretboard for instance. They are also useful when
figuring out which chords will substitute best for other chords, but we’ll get to
that later in the book.
Parent scales
This is the scale that other modes are derived from. As we’ve seen, for all 5
modes of the minor pentatonic, the first mode — the minor pentatonic, is
considered the Parent minor scale, since other modes are derived from it.
It is important to be able to tell quickly what is the parent scale of each mode
that you encounter. For example, can you figure out what is the parent scale of
minor pentatonic mode 4 in C#?
You would need to list out the notes first by applying the minor pentatonic mode
4 formula starting from C#:
C#(R) – TS – E(m3) – T – F#(P4) – TS – A(m6) – T – B(m7)
We know that relative modes are just re-orientations of the parent scale, so after
which note C# comes as the 4th?
It’s F# (F#, A, B, C#, E). So the parent minor scale of the minor pentatonic
mode 4 in C#, is F# minor pentatonic.
There are quicker methods to figure out the parent scales which usually involve
using your instrument, although this is something that will come naturally with
time as you continue to use modes in your playing. On guitar fretboard for
instance, there are physical shapes you can derive from the notes and their
positions relative to one another, and you can visualize this shape anytime you
want to recall the Parent scale and other relative modes of a mode, quickly.
Tonal center
Tonal center is like the center of gravity – it is usually the chord or a note (as in
our case with audio examples) that the mode is played over. When we use a
mode, there are some notes that will help define the tonal center in our solo.
These are the good notes, or you could also call them the home notes. These
notes are usually the notes of the chord that is playing in the background at the
moment, and the strongest of them is the Root note (it is usually the safest one to
land on during playing).
Then, there are some notes that pull away from the tonal center, establishing a
movement, and there are some that will add lots of tension which tends to be
resolved to a home note. There are also bad notes, which can really clash with
the tonal center or other notes playing in the background, and they usually won’t
sound good at all.
Parallel Modes
A parallel mode or scale is simply a scale that shares its root with the original
scale in question. In other words, the modes that share the same tonal center
are parallel modes. For instance, A major and A minor are parallel modes, B
minor pentatonic and B major pentatonic are parallel modes, same as E Locrian
and E Lydian (don’t worry about the fancy names for now), or any other
mode/scale with the same starting note. In audio examples for the minor
pentatonic modes we played parallel modes against the A drone note.
Relative modes share the same parent scale — they have the same notes, ordered
differently, but they have different Roots, which means they have different tonal
centers. Parallel modes on the other hand share the same root — the same tonal
center, but they have different Parent scale. This distinction is important to
understand and remember.
Parallel modes are quite useful in modal harmony, when it is not uncommon to
alter the harmony of a piece by substituting one parallel mode for another. This
is called modal interchange. More on this much later in the book.
The key we’ll be using is C Major and all of the improvisation excerpts will be
played over C drone note.
Ionian Mode
The first mode is the normal Major scale. This is called the Ionian mode. In C,
its notes are: C, D, E, F, G, A, B.
It consists of a:
Root, Major 2nd, Major 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, Major 6th, Major 7th
This mode has a happy, melodic, consonant sound. We have already examined
this scale/mode in the previous sections. In the improvisation excerpt we will
play this mode over C drone note so we will use C Ionian mode, you could just
say regular C major scale.
Ionian mode audio example in C -> http://goo.gl/szNpFJ
Dorian Mode
The 2nd mode of the Major scale is the Dorian mode. It starts on the 2nd note of
the Major scale. The Dorian mode is a minor mode (though it is not “the minor
scale”) since its 3rd is minor and not major (this is how scales are divided
between major and minor in general).
In D, its notes are: D, E, F, G, A, B, C.
It has a:
Root, Major 2nd, minor 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, Major 6th, minor 7th
How did we get this intervals? Easy, just for this mode let’s do a quick recap.
D Dorian is relative to C Major scale because, as we can see, they share the same
notes but have different tonal centers. Since we know the notes in C Major, we
know them in D Dorian as well, and it’s easy to figure out the intervals from
there:
D is the Root
E is the Major 2nd up from D
F is the minor 3rd up from D
G is the Perfect 4th up from D
A is the Perfect 5th up from D
B is the Major 6th up from D
C is the minor 7th up from D
Another way to get to this interval structure without the tonal center, is to take
the major scale formula:
T T S T T T S
— and re-orient it like we did with the notes. Since this mode starts on the 2nd
note of the Major scale, we start on 2nd ‘T’ (bolded).
So the scale formula for Dorian mode is:
T S T T T S T
Now we just start from the Root (which could be any note) and continue from
there:
R – T – M2 – S – m3 – T – P4 – T – P5 – T – M6 – S – m7 – T – R (O)
The Dorian mode is darker than the Ionian mode because of the minor 3rd, but it
sounds a little brighter than the minor scale because of the Major 6th. It is a
common scale in jazz and especially blues. Make sure to consult the Scale
Comparison Charts afterwards to look for these differences.
Now like with the pentatonic modes, we will play this mode in parallel since our
drone note is C. That means that we will play C Dorian mode over C in the
improvisation excerpt.
First we need to figure out the notes in C Dorian, which is super easy because
we can just apply its Dorian scale formula or its interval structure, both of which
we’re familiar with:
C – T – D – S – Eb – T – F – T – G – T – A – S – Bb – T – C (O)
Can you explain why we used b’s to write out these notes and not #’s?
Phrygian Mode
The third mode is the Phrygian mode. It starts on the 3rd note of the Major
scale. It is a minor mode (because of the minor 3rd), though again it is not the
natural minor scale. In E, its notes are: E, F, G, A, B, C, D.
It has a:
Root, minor 2nd, minor 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, minor 6th, minor 7th.
The Phrygian mode is dark sounding and due to its minor 2nd, is very exotic
sounding. The minor 2nd note is just a half-step above the Root, so this note adds
a lot of dissonance because it naturally wants to resolve to the nearest tonic (the
Root). This mode is used in some jazz, metal, as well as Latin and Indian-
influenced music.
In the audio example we use C Phrygian over the C drone note. The notes in C
Phrygian are:
C (R) – Db (m2) – Eb (m3) – F (P4) – G (P5) – Ab (m6) – Bb (m7)
Phrygian mode audio example in C -> http://goo.gl/dvr2ke
Lydian Mode
The fourth mode is the Lydian mode. It starts on the 4th note of the Major scale.
This is a major scale because it’s 3rd is major, and its notes in F are: F, G, A, B,
C, D, E.
It has a:
Root, Major 2nd, Major 3rd, Augmented 4th (Tritone), Perfect 5th, Major 6th, Major 7th
The Lydian mode is a very pleasant sounding mode — similar to the major scale
(it differs from it only by one note: the Tritone), only slightly more exotic. There
is a subtle dissonance in this mode, though it is a major mode, and so it tends to
sound rather complex, even sophisticated. It is widely used in jazz in place of a
major scale and over certain jazz chords.
Since we’ll be using C Lydian mode to play over the C drone note, we’ll need
the notes of the C Lydian scale:
C (R) – D (M2) – E (M3) – F# (Aug4) – G (P5) – A (M6) – B (M7)
Lydian mode audio example in C -> http://goo.gl/YtV1MW
Mixolydian Mode
The fifth mode is the Mixolydian mode. It starts on the 5th note of the Major
scale. It is a major mode and its notes in G are: G, A, B, C, D, E, F.
It consists of a:
Root, Major 2nd, Major 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, Major 6th, minor 7th
The Mixolydian mode is a great blues scale and has a round, stable sound. Like
with the Lydian mode, the only difference to the Major scale is one note — the
minor 7th.
In the audio example we will use C Mixolydian to play over C note. Its notes
are:
C (R) – D (M2) – E (M3) – F (P4) – G (P5) – A (M6) – Bb (m7)
Mixolydian mode audio example in C -> http://goo.gl/nKAPRv
Aeolian Mode
The sixth mode is the Aeolian mode. This is the Natural minor scale. In A, its
notes are: A, B, C, D, E, F, G. The interval names are all named in relation to the number of steps
taken from the root, not the number of steps that are between the
It has a: notes before and after
Root, Major 2nd, minor 3rd, Perfect 4th, Perfect 5th, minor 6th, minor 7th
The Aeolian mode is quite dark, even sad sounding, though it is not altogether
dissonant, and it is widely used in virtually all types of music. We have
examined this scale in the minor scale section.
In the improvisation excerpt we will use C Aeolian mode, or C Natural minor
scale. Its notes are:
C (R) – D (M2) – Eb (m3) – F (P4) – G (P5) – Ab (m6) – Bb (m7)
Aeolian mode audio example in C -> http://goo.gl/kkGZLh
Locrian mode
The seventh and the final mode is the Locrian mode. It starts on the 7th note of
the Major scale. In the case of C Major, it starts on B; so in B, its notes are: B,
C, D, E, F, G, A.
It contains a:
Root, minor 2nd, minor 3rd, Perfect 4th, diminished 5th (Tritone), minor 6th, minor 7th
This mode is strange, and rarely used. It is a minor scale, but both its 2nd and 5th
notes are flat. It is the only diatonic mode without a Perfect 5th, the Locrian
mode thus is highly unstable. Historically, this scale was avoided altogether. Its
sound is heavy, dissonant and unstable.
We’ll be using C Locrian in the improvisation excerpt over the C drone note.
The notes in C Locrian are:
C (R) – Db (m2) – Eb (m3) – F (P4) – Gb (dim5) – Ab (m6) – Bb (m7)
Locrian mode audio example in C -> http://goo.gl/i6DVRG
Diatonic Modes Comparison Charts (Plus
PMS Exercise)
I hope that you can see by now how modes are easy once you understand them
fundamentally.
To sum up, here’s a table showing the diatonic modes:
And here’s a table showing all modes with their respective intervals and notes.
Table 5: Diatonic modes with their intervals and notes.
Study this chart. It is very important chart for the diatonic modes and you will
need to memorize it if you want to use modes in your playing efficiently. Also,
take some time to answer the following questions:
How b’s appear after the Ionian mode? Notice that Dorian adds b’s on the 3rd and
the 7th, and Phrygian adds flats just behind those — on the 2nd and the 6th.
What is the only mode with a ‘#’ and where?
What is the mode with only one ‘b’ and where?
What is the mode with the most flats and where are they located?
What is the one big difference between Aeolian and Phrygian modes and why?
Why does Locrian mode sound obscure and why is it difficult to use?
Why have we written b5 for the Locrian mode instead of #4?
Dorian is just one whole step up from its relative PMS Root, or 10 half-steps down
from the root octave. So in any Dorian key you can just count two half-steps or
semitones back in your head. For example, PMS of D# Dorian is C# Major scale.
Phrygian is two whole steps up from the PMS root or 4 half-steps. In the opposite
direction, it is 8 half-steps down from the root octave.
Lydian is 5 half-steps up from the root, or 7 half-steps down from the root octave.
Mixolydian is 7 half-steps up from the root, or 5 half-steps down from the root
octave.
Aeolian is 9 half-steps up from the root, or 3 half-steps down from the root octave.
Locrian is 11 half-steps up from the root, or 1 half-step down from the octave.
Ionian is zero half-steps up or down from the root.
But what if we have a mode that is in the middle of the PMS, namely: Phrygian,
Lydian, Mixolydian or Aeolian, and we don’t want to bother with counting the
half-steps?
For that, let’s determine the PMS of F Lydian. The process which can be done
for any mode, is as follows (it was described briefly earlier in the Parent scale
section):
First, we list out the notes of F Lydian (you can use Table 4 – Diatonic modes
with their intervals, for this):
F (R) – G (M2) – A (M3) – B (#4) – C (P5) – D (M6) – E (M7) – F (O)
Since we know that Lydian is the 4th mode of its PMS, we look at the notes and
see to which note the F comes as the 4th?
It’s C.
C (1), D (2), E (3), F (4), G(5), A(6), B(7).
So PMS of F Lydian is C Major scale.
As an exercise try to figure out the Parent Major scale of the following modes:
1. G Dorian?
2. F# Mixolydian?
3. E Phrygian?
4. A# Aeolian?
5. G Lydian?
6. D Locrian?
7. B Ionian?
8. Db Mixolydian?
There will be answers provided at the end of the book in the Cheat Sheet section.
1. Play a drone note (on guitar, the E string would be most natural), which will establish
your key, your tonal center. Then you can play various scales and modes in that key.
So play an E note for example and let it drone (sustain), and then play an E Ionian,
and then an E Dorian, and then an E Phrygian, and so on. Play all of the modes that
share the same tonal center. This is what we have done for the Pentatonic and
Diatonic modes’ audio examples, but you should be able to do it on your own now.
Try it. Listen for differences in harmonic effect and feel for differences in overall
affect.
2. Once you have done this, it is useful to move on to playing over a single chord or
entire chord progressions. Make or find a backing track for each mode and play over
those progressions using those modes. You will develop a sense for the differences
between scales. However, if you’re not familiar with chords and chord progressions
yet, you will be able to do this after you go through the Chord section later in the
book.
3. Finally, begin substituting scales and modes for each other over the same chord or
progression. If you are playing over a minor progression, for instance in A minor,
you can perhaps begin by playing in A Aeolian (natural minor scale) and end by
playing in A Phrygian. This takes time to truly understand and be able to do, but it is
well worth the effort! By the end of this book you will have a much better
understanding of how to go about this.
You might also choose a single chord: a Major 7th chord for instance, and play
by cycling through all of the various modes of the pentatonic, diatonic, harmonic
minor and melodic minor scales. You can even use scales that don’t make any
natural sense — like a Dorian over a Major 7th chord — just to hear what it
sounds like. Doing this sort of substitution will help you really learn to feel the
differences between scales and will encourage you to remember certain
harmonic techniques and exotic sounds that you enjoy and want to incorporate in
your style.
Because of the structure like this (step and a half between 6th and 7th note)
harmonic minor scale is not a diatonic scale.
Why are we comparing the Harmonic minor modes to the diatonic major scale modes and not the
natural minor modes?
Diatonic Locrian: 1 – b2 – b3 – 4 – b5 – b6 – b7
Locrian #6: 1 – b2 – b3 – 4 – b5 – 6 – b7
This mode is sometimes also called Locrian natural because the 6th is no longer
flattened.
In B, HMM 2 or Locrian #6 notes are: B, C, D, E, F, G#, A.
In the improvisation excerpt this mode will be played over A note, so in order to
hear its characteristic sound we need to use A Locrian #6.
In A Locrian #6 the notes are: A, Bb, C, D, Eb, F#, G, and those are the notes
we’ll be using to improvise over A drone note. Note that this is a rare instance
where we have to use both sharps and flats because of the rule in music theory
we talked about — the rule which says that alphabet letters should not be
skipped when writing out the notes of a key.
Harmonic minor mode 2 –
Locrian #6 audio example in A -> http://goo.gl/LY6Vav
In A Dorian #4 the notes are: A, B, C, D#, E, F#, G, and these are the notes
we’ll be using to play over A note.
Harmonic minor mode 4 –
Dorian #4 audio example in A -> http://goo.gl/3YbEBr
In A Phrygian #3, the notes are: A, Bb, C#, D, E, F, G, and these are the notes
we’ll be using to play over A note.
Harmonic minor mode 5 –
Phrygian #3 audio example in A -> http://goo.gl/zaHsHv
1. It is sometimes called an Altered scale, since it is the Major scale with each of the
scale degrees flatted (altered). Though this is not the real Altered scale since we have
bb7. The Altered scale is actually the 7th mode of the Melodic minor scale and we’ll
get to that soon.
Regular Major scale: 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7.
Harmonic minor mode 7: 1 – b2 – b3 – b4 – b5 – b6 – bb7.
2. It is also sometimes called Super Locrian which is a fancy name but that’s because
it is the same as diatonic Locrian, but it goes one step further. Locrian has the Perfect
4th, while in Super Locrian that note is flatted (diminished 4th) and the b7 note is
flatted once again.
Diatonic Locrian: 1 – b2 – b3 – 4 – b5 – b6 – b7.
Super Locrian: 1 – b2 – b3 – b4 – b5 – b6 – bb7.
3. It is also sometimes called Mixolydian #1, but why?
Let’s take our G Major scale and G Mixolydian scale (whose Parent Major scale is
C), and list out their notes.
G Major has: G(1) – A(2) – B(3) – C(4) – D(5) – E(6) – F#(7)
G Mixolydian has: G(1) – A(2) – B(3) – C(4) – D(5) – E(6) – F(b7)
Now the 7th mode of the harmonic minor scale in this context (when compared
against G Mixolydian) looks like this:
G Mixolydian #1: G#(1) – A(2) – B(3) – C(4) – D(5) – E(6) – F(bb7)
The problem here is that there is one extra flat on the 7th, making it function as the
Major 6th in this context.
So we have three different names for the same thing. It’s important to understand
each name and its context (what is it telling you?), because as we said, the names
describe a mode’s relationship to other scales. Knowing these relationships is
what will help you with understanding and using modes in your playing. You
can use any name that you like just as long as you know how it’s related to other
scales and modes. In my opinion the best name to use here would be Super
Locrian.
In A, the notes of this mode are: A, Bb, C, Db, Eb, F, Gb, and these are the notes
we’ll be using to play over A drone note in the backing track.
Harmonic minor mode 7 –
Super Locrian audio example in A -> http://goo.gl/3u9yuv
Note that HM modes can have different names depending on their context, this is
something that is open to interpretation. What I’m presenting here is the most
logical way that these modes are (usually) named by.
And here’s a table showing all harmonic minor modes with their respective
intervals and notes.
Table 7: Harmonic minor modes interval structure.
As with the diatonic and harmonic minor modes this structure defines a series of
scales (modes), each with one of the seven notes as the root. Some of these
scales are used widely in jazz, and their sound is, while not as exotic as the
harmonic minor modes, still quite pronounced.
What is a Chord?
Some instruments are single-note instruments, capable of only playing one note
at a time. Other instruments, however, like guitars and pianos, are capable of
playing chords.
A chord, at its most basic, is simply a music unit consisting of more than one
note being played at the same time. In other words, it is the sound we get when
we combine any two (or more) notes and play them at the same time.
Chords come from scales. In fact, they are made up from notes in a scale. Each
scale implies a certain list of chords; once you have a scale in mind, it is easy to
produce chords that are contained in that scale. We’ll get to this soon.
Chords are, like scales, defined by a set of intervals relative to the root note. This
is how chords are named — the name of a chord tells us what kind of notes it
contains; it tells us what is the root note (could be any of the 12 notes), and from
which intervals that chord is made of. The intervallic structure of a chord — the
way the notes in the chord relate back to its root note — is called the “spelling”
of that chord, and if you know the name of the chord then you know, because of
its spelling, the notes that are contained in it.
If we have a Major 7th chord, for instance, then by the end of this chapter you
will learn how it consists of some Root, a Major 3rd, a Perfect 5th and a Major 7th
note (all relative to the root). This is the spelling of a Major 7th chord. If we
assign this chord a specific root note, for example G note, then the name of this
chord would be: G Major 7th; and if we then look at the G major scale, we would
know that the other notes in the chord, because of its spelling, are: G (R) B (M3)
D (P5) F# (M7).
It is possible, simply by naming the intervals contained in the chord, to create
highly complex chords (such as a Major 13 flat 9 chord). These chords are most
often used in jazz and they create sophisticated harmonic spaces. Their use is
highly specialized, with certain chords only being played in very specific
situations.
This is why C major 7th chord consists of the notes: C (Root — gives the chord
its name), E (Major 3rd), G (Perfect 5th) and B (Major 7th). Chord formulas and
chord spelling are very similar and useful concepts that give us a way of
analyzing the chords. We’ll explore this a lot more in further sections.
It is possible, and not uncommon, to alter chords that have been built by stacking
thirds — by moving one or more of the notes up or down, by inverting the
chords (rearranging their notes) so that a new chord is produced, or by adding a
note from the scale you’re working with to a pre-existing chord. It is also
possible to create chords by stacking intervals other than thirds — for instance,
fourths or fifths, although this is far less common. Generally speaking, however,
chords are generated in the way we have described — by stacking thirds above a
root note according to a particular scale.
In the case of triads (which are most used chord-types in rock, pop and other
genres) and quadads, it is usually the case that the chords are built of stacked
thirds (as previously discussed).
In the case of dyads, however, any interval can be used. In fact, any Chromatic
interval (see Table 1) is also a dyad chord; so they can be any kind of: major,
minor, perfect, augmented or diminished dyads. The most common dyads in
rock, are dyads produced by playing two notes a 5th apart — Root and the
Perfect 5th (sometimes followed by another Root — an Octave, on top). These
are usually called “Power chords”, and are commonly used by guitarists in rock
and metal genres.
It is possible to play a chord consisting of only 2 notes (and even of only 2
tones) and also of more than 4 notes. It is not uncommon for a jazz musician to
play chords consisting of 5 or 6 different notes, and piano players have the
ability to play as many as 10 distinct notes at one time. In most cases this is
avoided because the more distinct notes are added to a chord the more they will
clash with each other, and the chord will sound more and more dissonant. Most
pop songs have very simple harmony consisting of simple chords with very few
notes, whereas jazz on the other spectrum is usually very advanced harmony
with more complex chords.
Triad Chords
We’ll start with 3-note chords first because they are the simplest and easiest to
understand. They’re the most common chords today. It is worth repeating that
generally, when we talk about triads, we are talking about those triads that are
composed of two 3rds (usually either major 3rd or minor 3rd interval) stacked on
top of one another, or that are simple modifications of those stacked-3rd triads.
Triad chords are as follows:
Major triads — these chords consist of a: Root, a Major 3rd and a Perfect 5th.
This means that they are composed of a root, a major 3rd above that root and a
minor 3rd above that second note. Notice here that the distance from a Major 3rd
to a Perfect 5th is 3 semitones — which is a minor 3rd interval.
The chord formula for a major triad is: 1 3 5.
In C, the C major triad would be: C E G.
Minor triads — these are composed of a minor 3rd interval and a major 3rd
interval stacked on top of that (the inverse of the composition of major triads).
That means that they consist of a Root, a minor 3rd and a Perfect 5th.
As for the minor triad chord formula — first we have a root — 1, then we have
minor 3rd instead of a major 3rd. These two intervals are one semitone apart, so
that means in order to get the minor 3rd we just have to flatten the major 3rd note
by a semitone, so we simply write: b3. And then we have a perfect 5th as usual.
Also, note that the distance between the minor 3rd and perfect 5th is 4 semitones,
which is a major 3rd interval.
So a minor triad chord formula is simply: 1 b3 5, and from our C major chord
consisting of notes: C E G, we would get C minor with the notes: C Eb G.
You can see here how only one note difference as little as one semitone apart
changes the mood of the chord dramatically. It goes from happy sounding
(major) to sad sounding (minor). We can conclude that 3rd in a chord is a very
important note that makes a huge difference to its sound.
When it comes to triads, there are also:
Augmented triads — these are major triads with a sharp 5th. That means they
are built from two major thirds stacked on top of one another and contain the
notes: Root, Major 3rd, Augmented 5th (same as minor 6th). Their sound is jarring
(sometimes a good thing) and these are rarely played.
The augmented triad chord formula is: 1 3 #5.
#5 tells that we simply have to raise the perfect 5th note by one semitone.
As for the notes, C Augmented, or just Caug, would be: C E G#.
Diminished triads — these are minor triads with a flat 5th (Tritone). They are
composed of two minor thirds stacked on one another, which means they consist
of a Root, a minor 3rd and a diminished 5th.
The diminished chord formula is: 1 b3 b5, which tells that we have to flatten
both 3rd and 5th note of the parent scale.
The C diminished chord, or just Cdim, would then be: C Eb Gb.
All of these four basic triads are composed of two intervals — major and
minor 3rds — stacked on top of one another in various permutations.
Suspended Chords
It is common, however, to alter those triads slightly and arrive at chords that are
derived from stacked 3rds but that contain other intervals. This is done by altering
the second note in those triads — the 3rd, whether it is a major 3rd or a minor 3rd.
These new chords are called Suspensions, and there are two types of them. First,
there are suspended chords in which the 3rd is lowered to a 2nd. These are called
Suspended 2nd chords, or just sus2.
Suspended 2nd triads — If you begin with a major or minor triad and lower the
3rd to a major 2nd, then you will have a sus2 triad. It consists of a Root, a Major
2nd and a Perfect 5th, and it is built from a perfect 4th stacked on top of a major
2nd interval.
The chord formula for a sus2 chord is: 1 2 5.
This means that the notes of Csus2 chord would be: C D G (we just take the 2nd
note instead of the 3rd from the C major scale).
Suspended 4th triads — The second kind of suspended triad is one in which the
3rd is raised to a 4th (rather than lowered to a 2nd). These are called: Suspended 4th
chords, and are commonly used in jazz as well as in rock and pop to add specific
color to major and minor triad progressions, that is neither major nor minor.
Beginning with a major or minor triad, Sus4’s are derived by raising the second
note in the chord (major or minor 3rd) up to a perfect 4th. It is built from a major
2nd interval stacked on top of a perfect 4th (the opposite of sus2), and it is
composed of a Root, a Perfect 4th and a Perfect 5th.
The chord formula for a sus4 chord is: 1 4 5.
The notes of Csus4 chord would be: C F G.
This concludes all forms of triad chords... Almost.
It is also possible to talk about suspensions of diminished and augmented
chords — although these are very rarely used. In these cases, the suspended
chords have the same qualities as before, only the fifth is either flatted (in the
case of a suspension of a diminished chord) or sharped (in the case of a
suspension of an augmented chord).
These chords are shown in the following way:
dimsus4 (1 4 b5),
dimsus2 (1 2 b5),
augsus4 (1 4 #5),
augsus2 (1 2 #5).
Out of these chords the dimsus4 is extremely dissonant because there is only a
half-step difference between the Perfect 4th and diminished 5th.
Take a look at this table for a clear overview of all the chords so far.
This concludes all chord triads. They are the most basic chords of the harmony
built in thirds – called: Tertian harmony – which vast majority of chords that
we hear today are based on. They are not hard to learn and should be
memorized. There are also the 1st and 2nd inversions for each of these triad
chords, but we have yet to go over the inversions.
This concludes the main quadad chords. These of course are not all possible
combinations of intervals that quadads can consist of, there are quite a few more
you can make, for instance: Dominant 7 chord with a flat 5th (1 3 b5 b7). These
may or may not sound good in different situations, so always use your ear as a
guide and remember the golden rule: “If it sounds good, it is good”.
1. Major chords
2. Minor chords
3. Dominant chords
Here are some rules and guidelines to know which family a chord belongs to:
If a chord has a Major 3rd and a Major 7th then it is definitely in the Major family.
These chords are generally happy sounding, and generally speaking their function is
to provide stability in a major key and give context for melodic direction in a chord
progression.
If a chord has a minor 3rd note in it, then it is considered to be a part of the minor
family. These chords are generally sad sounding, the opposite of Major, and their
function generally speaking is also to provide stability, but in a minor key.
If a chord has a Major 3rd along with a minor 7th, then it is definitely in the dominant
family. Dominant chords are usually used as quadads — they are major triads with
the addition of a minor 7th. These chords are used in all blues and many other genres
— they create a lot of tension which tends to be resolved in a chord progression.
From these three basic chords, all other chords can be attained. By altering notes
of those chords or adding notes to them (usually in the form of “extensions” —
thirds stacked on top of the chords), and then by subtracting other notes away
from the resulting chords, it is possible to generate every other chord that can be
used. For all these reasons, many musicians, even in jazz, consider every chord a
member of either the major, minor or dominant family.
When extending chords, we first look at the scale and extend its notes beyond
the octave. We can simply write this as:
The octave is the eight note in a 7-note scale. So when a scale starts again at 1,
we can write the number 8 instead indicating that this is the octave with which
the scale starts again — only an octave higher. Then we just continue writing the
numbers in order from there. This means that the 9th note will be the same as the
2nd, 10th will be the same as the 3rd, 11th same as 4th, 13th same as 6th, etc.
If we have our usual 1 3 5 7 chord, and extend it by a third, we would land on
the 9th; if we extend that by another third we would get to the 11th, and if extend
that by a third we would get to the 13th.
So the order in which the chords extend is:
Triads (1 3 5) -> 7th chords (most often as quadads) 1 3 5 7 -> 9’s (1 3 5 7 9) -> 11’s (1 3 5
7 9 11) -> 13’s (1 3 5 7 9 11 13).
To sum up so far:
Adding 3rds to 3rd-based triads gives us 7th chords. Because these chords (usually)
contain four notes, they’re now quadads. With triads, 7th chords form the foundation
of the 3rd-based (Tertian) harmony. 7th chords are not considered “extended chords”,
but they are viewed as triad extensions.
For a chord to be an extended chord, it has to contain the notes that are beyond the
octave.
Adding 3rds to 7’s gives us 9’s. These can be 5-note chords but usually some non-
essential notes of a chord that don’t affect the sound much are omitted. This also
goes for 11’s and 13’s.
Adding 3rds to 9’s gives us 11’s.
And adding 3rds to 11’s gives us 13’s, which are now fully extended chords because
they contain 7 distinct notes in them.
It’s important to know that in practice, not all chords are played, or voiced, with
all of these notes being included — so that it is possible to play a 7th chord for
instance (which consists of a root, a 3rd, a 5th and a 7th) by playing only a root, a
3rd and a 7th, and leave out the 5th. It is very common for notes to be left out of
the chord in this way, and there are different reasons for doing so. Sometimes it
is physically impossible to play all the notes in a chord, but also sometimes
leaving out the notes that are not crucial will make the chord sound clearer and
more pronounced. Having too many notes in a chord makes it sound crowded,
unclear, and confusing. So removing these non-essential notes and reducing the
chord to a quadad (or even triad) is favorable because it makes the chord sound
more focused, clearer, and simply better, because there are less notes clashing
with one another. There are certain “rules” about which notes can be left out of a
chord and which cannot, we’ll get to them in a bit.
Note that we stop at the 13th note because If we were to add another third to our
extended chord, we would land on the 15th note, and this note is the same as the
1st first note of the chord only two octaves higher. What this means is that
stacking thirds after the 13th would only get us the same notes we had in our 1 3
5 7 chord. Since this wouldn’t give us any new notes there is no point in
extending any further.
Another important thing to know is that the core part of the chord is up to the
7th note. There are many variations of these chords, as we’ve seen, and each has
a name. Any further extensions beyond the 7th are handled and treated
differently. This is done in a way so that there are only three basic variations
of each extended chord: Major, minor and Dominant.
The extended chords are as follows:
Major 9 – these are very cool, dreamy sounding chords. They consist of a Root,
Major 3rd, Perfect 5th, Major 7th, Major 9th (same note as the Major 2nd only an
octave higher). They are composed of intervals like a Major 7 chord (major 3rd
– minor 3rd – major 3rd), with another minor 3rd added on top.
Chord formula is: 1 3 5 7 9.
C Major 9, or CMaj9, would have the notes: C E G B D; although the 5th note (G
in this case) is often left out of this chord (as well as all other extended chords).
Minor 9 – similarly to Minor 7 chords these share the same intervals; we just
have to add another major 3rd on top.
They consist of a Root, minor 3rd, Perfect 5th, minor 7th, Major 9th.
Chord formula is: 1 b3 5 b7 9.
C minor 9, or just Cm9, would be: C, Eb, G, Bb, D.
Dominant 9 – these chords are used often in funk (dominant 9 is sometimes
referred to as the ‘funk chord’), and of course, jazz. Here, again, we’re just
adding an interval – major 3rd in this case – on top of a dominant 7 chord (to get
to the 9th from the minor 7th).
These chords consist of a Root, Major 3rd, Perfect 5th, minor 7th and a Major 9th.
Chord formula is: 1 3 5 b7 9.
C dominant 9, or just C9, would be: C E G Bb D.
Personally, all 9’s are some of my favorite chords to play on guitar.
Major 11 – these chords consist of a Root, Major 3rd, Perfect 5th, Major 7th,
Major 9th and Perfect 11th (same as the Perfect 4th).
Chord formula is: 1 3 5 7 9 11.
CMaj11 would be: C E G B D F.
Minor 11 – these contain a Root, minor 3rd, Perfect 5th, minor 7th, Major 9th,
Perfect 11th.
Chord formula is: 1 b3 5 b7 9 11.
Cm11 would be: C Eb G Bb D F.
Dominant 11 – these contain a Root, Major 3rd, Perfect 5th, minor 7th, Major 9th,
Perfect 11th.
Chord formula is: 1 3 5 b7 9 11.
C11, would be: C E G Bb D F.
Because 11’s are 6-note chords they can be very impractical and difficult to play,
but they can be reduced to 4-note chords simply by leaving out the 5th and the
9th, which are (usually) non-crucial notes for these chords.
Major 13 – these contain a Root, Major 3rd, Perfect 5th, Major 7th, Major 9th,
Perfect 11th, Major 13th (same as Major 6th). That was a lot of notes.
Chord formula is: 1 3 5 7 9 11 13.
CMaj13 has the notes: C E G B D F A.
Minor 13 – contain a Root, minor 3rd, Perfect 5th, minor 7th, Major 9th, Perfect
11th, Major 13th.
Chord formula is: 1 b3 5 b7 9 11 13.
Cm13 has the notes: C Eb G Bb D F A.
Dominant 13 – lastly, these chords contain a Root, Major 3rd, Perfect 5th, minor
7th, Major 9th, Perfect 11th, Major 13th.
Chord formula is: 1 3 5 b7 9 11 13.
C13 has the notes: C E G Bb D F A.
13’s are often difficult chords to use and play. It’s like you’re playing a full scale
as a chord. They occur with less frequency (usually with one or more notes
omitted), but when they do they can spice up any progression, sometimes with a
startling effect.
* NOTE that after the first octave (P8) all intervales are the same only higher by an octave
(to any number you just add 7). These intervals that are larger than one octave are called
Compound intervals, and the 15th note (P15) is called a Double Octave.
Looking at the Table 16 you can see how the 9th, 11th and 13th, are “fixed” to
being: Major 9th, Perfect 11th and Major 13th note, no matter whether the
extended chord is major, minor or dominant. Since extensions after the 7th are
always these notes, we just call them: 9th, 11th and 13th. If any of these extended
notes is changed by a half-step up or down, then what we have is something that
is called an Altered chord. Those can really make the head hurt, but we’ll deal
with them in a separate section.
Rules for Leaving Out the Notes in
Extended Chords
As we’ve said, some of the notes in complex chords like 9’s, 11’s and 13’s,
could be (and are most often) omitted while still retaining the distinctive quality
of a 9th, 11th or 13th chord. The following rules are more like guidelines and less
like the rules. You can really use any combination of notes that you want as long
as it sounds good to you. In fact, any rule in music can be broken if it sounds
good.
The most important notes in a chord are its Root, 3rd and 7th — these notes have to be
present most of the time (no 7th in a triad of course).
Having said that, the 3rd can be excluded when there is some clashing between the
notes. This would create a suspended type of chord.
Strangely, the root note also doesn’t have to be played under some circumstances.
For instance, since Root is the lowest note in a chord it can be left out in a band
situation where you have a bass player or someone else who is playing the root.
Otherwise, the chords sound better and less messy with it.
If you leave out the 7th, it will result in getting different kind of chords, called:
Added tone chords (more on them in the next section).
5th note in a chord can be left out most of the time, unless it is one its characteristic
notes.
9th chords should have: 1 3 7 9. The 5th note can be easily left out here.
13th chord should have at least: 1 3 7 13 — we can exclude the 5th, 9th and 11th.
11th chords should have at least: 1 3 7 11 — we can eliminate both the 5th and the 9th.
b9 and #9
Dominant 7 chord consists of the notes: R M3 P5 m7.
b9 note is equal to a minor 2nd. The name of this chord is 7b9. C7b9 would be: C
E G Bb Db.
On the other side, #9 on top of the dominant 7 is special because it is one of the
most popular altered chords used in funk, blues, rock and jazz. It is commonly
referred to as the Hendrix chord (specifically E7#9 because of the open E string
on guitar). #9 is equal to a minor 3rd, and having this note along with a Major 3rd
and minor 7th produces a really funky sounding chord. In C, the notes of this
chord are: C E G Bb Eb.
To summarize:
There is no b11 alteration on a Major type chord because that note is already a part of
the chord.
There are no #9 and #13 alterations on a minor type chord, and
There are no b11 and #13 alterations on a Dominant type chord, for the same reason.
Now we’re going to add all of the altered notes that are possible for a dominant 7
chord: b9, #9, b5 (same as #11), #5 (same as b13). Note that we exclude the 5th
(G in this case) because that is one of the notes we’re going to alter with b5 and
#5.
Now we have:
Now the scale we got by adding the altered notes looks very messy. We will tidy
it up using enharmonic equivalents so that we can arrange all notes in
alphabetical order.
What we have created now essentially is the C altered scale. Since this scale is
the 7th mode of the melodic minor scale, we know that it is only a semitone
below the parent melodic minor scale of this mode. This means that the parent
melodic minor scale of an altered scale is found on its 2nd degree. In the key of
C, that would be Db. So the parent melodic minor scale of C altered is Db
melodic minor, and C altered is the 7th mode of Db melodic minor.
Parent melodic minor scale is very easy to figure out in this case – you just have
to look one semitone above the root of a dominant 7 chord to find it. For
example, parent melodic minor scale of G altered scale (built out of G7 chord) is
Ab melodic minor. Why would you want to do this? Well, this is very
convenient because it is usually easier to think and visualize the scale in the
context of a melodic minor rather than an altered scale.
Note that this is only done in practice on dominant type chords because they a
have specific function in a progression, which is to build up tension right before
it gets resolved.
Have you noticed which notes were left unchanged by the alterations we had
above? It’s the M3 (E) and b7 (Bb). If we had all notes unaltered we would get:
Chords, as we know by now, are most often built in thirds so we will simply
begin by stacking thirds just as before. We will start by adding the 3rd and the 5th
note on each scale degree.
This will result in getting 7 different sets of 3 notes, and then we have to analyze
what chord those notes make up. For example, first note in C major scale is C.
When you add the 3rd and the 5th note to it, you get the notes: C E G. Second
note in C major is D, after adding the 3rd and the 5th (counting from D as the first
note), you get: D F A, etc.
Now we need to analyze these groups of 3 notes and see which chord quality
they make up.
Now we can see that D is the Root note and A is the 5th note, but F – the 3rd note in our
chord – is not found in a D major scale.
Instead we have F#. This tells us that our note (F) is flatted by a semitone (a half-step
down on the note circle). When we stack thirds (1 3 5) in a D major scale, we get the
notes of a D major chord: D F# A, but since our 3rd note is F, it means that our chord
formula sequence is actually: 1 b3 5.
And what kind of chord has a formula: 1 b3 5?
Minor chord, of course. So this must be D minor then.
3. Next group of notes is: E, G, B;
We check the E major scale and repeat exactly the same process. In E major the
1 3 5 notes are: E G# B. Since our 3rd is G, it means that, again, this note is
flatted by a semitone, and the formula sequence for E G B is: 1 b3 5. This tells
us that the 3rd chord is another minor chord, and it’s E minor (in the key of C
major).
I’ll let you figure out the chord for the next three note groups: F A C; G B D; A
C E;
You just have to follow the same process as described for the first two note
groups.
If you have any trouble, a little bit further in this section there will be a complete
list with all C major scale chords so you can check to make sure you got it right.
I just wanted to explain the last group of 3 notes starting on the 7th degree of the
C major scale — B D F.
When we check the major scale of the bottom note:
— we can see that both the 3rd (D) and the 5th (F) in our note group are a
semitone lower than the 3rd and the 5th in the B major scale. This means that
instead of 1 3 5, we have 1 b3 b5.
Do you remember what type of chord has this kind of formula?
You’ve guessed it — it’s a diminished one!
Each key of the major scale produces 3 Major chords, 3 minor chords, and has
one diminished chord which starts on the 7th scale degree!
There is really only one difficulty with all this and it’s that in the real world the
notes are not always given in this correct triad order.
Sometimes a chord inversion is used (we talk about those next) where the root
note is not the lowest note in a chord.
For example, you can have notes: F A D, and it might seem confusing to figure
out the chord. It can be many different things, but this is simply the inversion of
D minor (D F A).
Here’s another example: B G# E. Can you guess this chord? It’s E major, but
with the reverse note order.
Recognizing these chords by their notes even when they’re in an inversion is
something you’re going to become better at as you gain more experience playing
and figuring stuff out by yourself.
Good start is to get used to the common chord note groups so that when you see
one with a different note order you can instantly remember what chord that is.
The common ones are: CEG (C chord), GBD (G), FAC (F), ACE (Am), EGB
(Em), DF#A (D), AC#E (A), BD#F# (B), EG#B (E), BbDF (Bb), BDF# (Bm),
DFA (Dm).
In a more advanced harmony where more complex chords (with more notes) are
used, it will be harder to do this because some notes can be left out. This can
create a lot of confusion as to what type of a chord it is, but there are methods to
figure out even those, it’s just a little bit more complicated.
Coming back to our scale chord, you have to remember that every major scale
key will produce this same sequence of chord qualities.
Here is the major scale triad chord sequence:
This sequence needs to be memorized. Each major key will produce this same
sequence of triad chords.
Note that scale degrees are usually written in roman numerals. This is important
because of the chord progressions we’re going to talk about later.
The diatonic quadads chord sequence is similar, but with a little bit different
chord qualities:
We know that these 7th quadads are the chords you get after adding another third
on top of triad chords. You can easily figure out the diatonic quadads on your
own and come up with the same chords as in this sequence. Just in case, if you
need any help, let’s do it together for the V chord (Dominant 7) and for the vii
chord (min7b5), because we haven’t had them in diatonic triads.
Dominant 7 chord is the chord we get if stack the thirds starting from the 5th
scale degree. In the case of C Major scale, the 5th degree is G, so we build our
dominant chord on top of this note. We take the 1st, 3rd, 5th and a 7th (four notes
because it is a quadad chord), but starting from the G note. We get the notes: G,
B, D and F. Then we check the G major scale and see that G is the Root, B is the
Major 3rd, D is the Perfect 5th, but the 7th note is F#, and we have F. This means
that the 7th note is flatted by a semitone, and what we have is the chord formula
for a Dominant 7 chord: 1 3 5 b7.
In quadad form, min7b5 is the chord we get when we stack the thirds starting
from the 7th major scale degree. If we do this in the key of C major we get the
notes: B, D, F and A. Then we check these notes in B major scale – B is the
Root, D# the third (we have D), F# is the 5th (we have F), and A# is the 7th (we
have A). So all notes after the root have been flatted by a semitone. This means
that the chord formula for this chord is: 1 b3 b5 and b7. In triad form this was a
diminished chord (or half-diminished to be precise), but when we add another
third on top it becomes min7b5.
Note that our diminished 7th, or full diminished chord, with the formula: 1 b3 b5
bb7, is not a diatonic chord because it doesn’t appear in this diatonic sequence of
4-note chords.
We can do this exact process to figure out the chords that are found in a minor
Scale, but we don’t have to. We know that minor scale is simply the 6th mode of
a major scale, so all we have to do is take the major scale chord sequence and re-
orient it so that we start from the vi chord.
By doing so we get the minor scale triad chord sequence:
In the key of A minor (the 6th mode of C major) that would be:
A min (i), B dim (ii), C Maj (III), D min (iv), E min (v), F Maj (VI), G Maj (VII).
You can apply this minor chord sequence to any natural minor key and you
would get the chords in that key.
Minor quadads sequence follows the same logic:
Lastly, keep in mind that this is not the only way to assemble chords that sound
good together, and very often improvisors and composers use chords that are not
related diatonically or not generated by a diatonic scale, but it is one easy way to
know and ensure that what you play will sound good.
These triad inversions — in the case of major and minor triads — have special
names:
The first inversion of a major or minor triad is called a “6” chord. As we have seen
this is because its bass note is the 3rd of the original triad and it contains, relative to
the new bass note, a 3rd (Major 3rd in a minor chord inversion, and minor 3rd in a
major chord inversion) and a 6th (Major 6th in a minor chord inversion and minor 6th
in a major chord inversion).
The second inversion of a major or minor triad is called a “6/4” chord, since this
chord, whose bass note is a 5th, contains a 4th and a 6th above that bass note. This
inversion essentially gives us a 6sus4 chord (R, P4, M6) in the case of a major
inversion, and augmented sus4 triad (R, P4, Aug5 – same as m6) in the case of a
minor inversion.
1. First we recognize that there are only three distinct notes in this chord, so this must
be a triad of some kind. We also disregard any #’s or b’s because we just want to
figure out the thirds alphabetically.
2. Then we stack a third on top of each note, starting from the lowest, which in this case
is A.
A third up from A if we count alphabetically (A, B, C – 1, 2, 3) is the C note. We
check if this note matches the note next to A in our chord. It doesn’t since the next
note is F#.
3. Then we move on to the next note – F#.
We disregard the sharp; so a third up from F (F, G, A – 1, 2, 3) is A note. This is
good because A matches the next note in our chord. This means that F# could be the
starting note.
Then we add a third up from A, which, again, is the C note, and it doesn’t match the
next note, which is D. It seems that F# is not the root note.
4. Then we move on to D.
A third up from D is F. It matches. We add a third to F, and get A note. Match again.
Since this is a triad it is enough to get two matches in row (for quadads you
would need three matches). Now we just take back the sharps or flats to all notes
that had them. In this case, only F had a sharp. The notes we got by rearranging
them in thirds are: D F# A, and these are the notes of a D Major chord. Since A
note was at the bottom as the lowest note, it means that this is the 2nd inversion
of D Major chord.
This process is quite straightforward and you can use it anytime you’re unsure
what chord you’re facing. When it comes to triads you just have to watch out for
those suspensions (2nd and 4th). If any of the notes with a stacked third doesn’t
match, try to count up alphabetically by a second and a fourth. For a sus2 chord
first find a note match with the stacked second and then with a stacked fourth
note. For a sus4 chord first find a match with the stacked fourth and then with
stacked second note.
As the number of the notes in a chord increases it gets progressively more
difficult to figure out the chord, plus a chord can sometimes have several
different names – the choice of which will depend on the overall harmony you’re
given (or not).
Slash Chords
Slash chords are simply the method we use to notate inverted chords.
They look as two letter names separated by a forward slash, for example:
Here, the note on the top left represents the chord, and the note on the bottom
right represents the chord note that is in the bass as the lowest note. In this case,
G is in the bass of the C Major7 chord. This chord has the notes: C(1), E(3),
G(5), B(7), so what we have is the 2nd inversion of the CMaj7 chord.
In a band situation bass player usually covers the lowest note of slash chords;
and then a chord player can just play a regular non-inverted chord.
Slash chords are not just used for notating inverted chords. They are most of the
time, but they can have other uses as well.
One such instance is when we have a slash chord in which the bottom right note
is not a part of the chord on the top left. For example, G/F# is telling us that we
have to play a G major triad on top of the F# note in the bass. This is usually
regarded as bad notation practice because you don’t actually realize at first what
chord it is that you’re playing in a chord progression. This limits your options as
a performer, and makes it harder to make good decisions when it comes to voice
leading and how to move from one chord to the next.
Voice Leading
With all the chords we had so far you might wonder what is the purpose of chord
inversions, and rightfully so. But there is one main reason why musicians use
them, and it comes down to voice leading.
Voice leading is an older term that comes from choral music. This is the music
written for choirs – a musical ensemble consisting of only singers. In this type of
music, each voice (singer) has a unique melody line, and the way this melody
line moves and interacts with other voices in a choir is called voice leading.
What’s interesting is that this translates to other concepts in music. For example,
if instead of singers we had four different instruments each playing a unique
melody line, those melodies – consisting of individual notes – would line up to
create and outline chords. Voice leading would be the process by which those
melodies move in harmony.
Voice leading also translates to playing chords on a single instrument. Here, it is
all about how we connect chords together one after another to create smooth
melodic lines for each note in a chord as it moves to the next chord.
Let’s say we play a couple of 4-note chords in a chord progression. We can think
of each note as a separate melody line that moves as one chord changes to
another chord. The point of voice leading is to create melodic lines for each of
the chord notes that are smooth, easy to play and good sounding, so that the
overall chord progression sounds better and more appealing to our ears. In order
to do this, we have to pay attention what each of the chord notes are doing.
In the early days, composers noticed that moving between the notes that are
closer to each other sounds better. So generally, when composing or arranging
harmony we want to avoid awkward intervals and jumps that are difficult to play
and don’t sound as good.
From this comes the main principle of voice leading which states that as the
harmony changes, each voice (chord note for example) should ideally move no
more than one whole step up or down in pitch. A note can remain the same
between two chords, or it can move by a half-step or a whole step, but no more
than that. This is considered a good voice leading practice. This would produce
smooth sounding chord changes that are more melodic, and easier to play and
listen to. A good analogy for this would be rhyming of the lyrics in a song – the
words that rhyme are like the chord notes that move no more than a whole step
as the chord harmony changes.
Let’s say that we have a very popular chord sequence, called 12-Bar Blues. This
sequence, consisting of only 3 chords – I, IV, and V in any key – is based on one
of the most familiar sounding chord progressions. One of the main reasons this
progression sounds so memorable is because of good voice leading. Let’s
analyze what the chord notes are doing as they change throughout the
progression. We will do this in the key of E.
I chord in the key of E is E, with the notes: E G# B
IV chord is A, with the notes A C# E
V chord is B, with the notes: B D# F#
In a 12-Bar Blues sequence, these chords move in the following way:
E – A – E – B – A – E – B – E.
(Note that these chords are played for different periods of time – we’re just
looking at the changes here).
In the first change (E to A) E note remains the same, G# goes a half-step up to
A, and B moves by a whole step up to C#.
In the second change (A to E) it’s all the same just in reverse.
In the third change (E to B) E goes a half-step down to D# (it is also a whole
step down from F#), G# goes a whole step down to F#, and B remains the same.
In the fourth change (B to A) B note moves a whole step down to A (it is also a
whole step down from C#), D# moves a half-step down to C# (it is also a half-
step down from E), and F# moves a whole tone back to E note.
In the second to last change (E to B) in this sequence, if we were to introduce an
A note to a B chord, which is a minor 7th – thus getting the B7 chord (this is
often done in on the V chord to provide stronger resolution to the I chord); A
would resolve nicely on the final change (B to E) to G# and B notes in the E
chord.
We can see that there isn’t a single interval between the notes in these chords
that is larger than one whole step. But what if we want to create descending or
ascending bass lines (which is often done in voice leading), or to create specific
melodies within the chords as they change; or even to have a pedal note – which
is a single note played in one place that sustains consonantly and dissonantly
throughout the chord progression? This is where chord inversions and different
chord voicings come into play.
In order to effectively voice lead, you often need to invert chords and use
voicings that allow you to follow voice leading principles. For example, if you
want to have a descending bass line, you can invert the chords so that the lowest
note of each is no more than a whole step away from the bass note of the last
played chord. Chord inversions can also be used if you want to remain in one
position on your instrument and play all your chords there without jumping up or
down with your hand. This is very useful for playing a pedal note – you would
need to invert all chords so that you remain in one position on your instrument
throughout the progression.
For all these reasons, studying voice leading and inversions is incredibly useful
to any musician, especially to composers and arrangers.
Polychords
it is possible to combine chords to produce new chords. These are usually called
polychords. Often, these chords are complex and difficult to play over, but they
are useful to some improvisors and composers for a variety of reasons.
Polychords, as the name implies, represent two chords played at the same time,
with one being played on top of the other. They are very similar to slash chords,
but different in a few important ways.
Instead of with a forward slash, polychords are notated as a fraction with one
chord on top and the other on the bottom. The chord that’s on the bottom is the
lower part of the polychord. In other words, the top chord is played on top of the
bottom chord.
Here’s how a notated polychord usually looks like:
Here we have a G Major 7 chord played on top of A minor chord. When we list
out their notes together:
– What we essentially get is the A minor13 chord, and this is because the notes
of G major 7 (G, B, D, M13), are the minor 7th, Major 9th, Perfect 11th and Major
13th in the key of A.
Let’s check out a harder example:
In this case we have a G Major chord played on top of D minor chord. Let’s list
out the notes of both chords and analyze them.
Dm has notes: D F A, and Gmaj has: G B D. If we group them together we get:
D F A G B.
All of the notes are stacked in thirds alphabetically (we leave out the last D
because it is repeated), but A to G is a weird jump. We check the G note in the
key of D major (we always check the key of the bottom note) and see that it is
the Perfect 4th. In extended chord harmony, Perfect 4th an octave up becomes a
Perfect 11th. B note in the key of D is Major 6th, and that is equal to a Major 13th.
What we have is: D as the Root, F is the minor 3rd, A is the Perfect 5th, G is the
Perfect 11th, and B is the Major 13th.
Since we have a minor triad, no 7th, and two added notes – this is an added tone
chord with two added tones; you can write it like this: Dm(add11 add13).
We can conclude that polychords are just a shorter way of writing long and
complex extended chords of any kind – including the altered ones. Although this
presents a problem because when we see a polychord we don’t know at first
what kind of chord we’re really dealing with. In other words, we usually don’t
know the relationship of the notes in the top chord to the key of the bottom
chord, unless we analyze the notes. Like with the slash chords that have a non-
chord bass note, using polychords like this makes it more difficult to figure out
the harmony and make good decisions when playing.
Polychords actually make much more sense in the context of polytonal music
where you have two or more tonal centers happening at the same time and
you’re trying to create two separate harmonies. More on that later in the book.
1. There is a chord (or chords) that is the center of the progression, called the tonic.
This chord (or chords) is often played first and it is always the center of gravity of
the progression — everything else wants to resolve to a tonic in way or another.
2. Then there is the part of the progression that moves away from the tonic, which
involves playing one or more “subdominant” chords.
3. And there is the part of the progression that moves back toward the tonic in which
“dominant” chords are played. These chords have the strongest pull to the tonic
because they add lots of tension.
The most basic unit of a chord progression is the resolution: the movement from one
chord that is not a tonic chord to a tonic chord, establishing and resolving tension,
creating movement and producing a harmonic direction.
A resolution like this — two chords, resolving to the tonic — is called a cadence.
A special instance of this is the movement from a major chord on the fifth to the
tonic: a V-I (in a major key) or V-i (in a minor key). If neither of those chords is an
inversion, then the resolution is called a Perfect cadence, and it is the foundation of
most of the basic chord progressions in Western music. Whether the progression is in
a major key (in which case the tonic chord is major (I) and the diatonic chords of that
key are indexed to the major scale of that root), or in a minor key (in which case the
tonic chord is minor (i) and the diatonic chords of that key are indexed to the minor
scale of that root), the chord built on the fifth (the dominant chord) is major.
This is because in order for the resolution from the V chord to the tonic to be
strong, the 3rd of the V chord needs to be major so that it can resolve up to the 5th
of the tonic chord. This may sound complicated but take some time with it.
Often times, these dominant chords are played as 7th chords (dominant 7th
quadads), in which a minor 7th is added to a major triad, thus adding more
tension. Chord progressions are written (like chords) using roman numerals with
dashes in between. Numerals for major and dominant chords are capitalized,
while the minor ones aren’t.
1. I — vi — IV — V
2. I — V — vi — IV
3. I — V — IV — V
4. I — IV — V
5. iii — vi — ii — V
6. I — IV — I — V
7. I — V — ii — IV
8. I — vi — ii — V
9. I — V — vi — iii
10. I — iii — IV — V
You can just pick a key and play any of these chord progression and it will
sound great.
More complicated progressions include, for example, iii-vi-ii-V-I (in which
diatonic chords are played on the 3rd, 6th, 2nd, 5th and tonic of a major key), I-vii-
vi-V, and iii-vi-V-I, among others.
Notice that in all of these cases, movement is established away from some tonic
chord (usually to some sub-dominant chord) and then, passing through a
dominant chord (usually the V chord), a cadence is produced as the progression
resolves back to the tonic.
Diatonic chords that could act as tonic, and are therefore in the “tonic family” are:
1st, 3rd and 6th chords.
2nd and 4th chords are both in the “sub-dominant family”.
5th and 7th chords are both in the “dominant family”.
Chord Arpeggios
Chords are made up of different notes; we usually play these notes at the same
time, but we can also play them individually, and that’s when we’re playing
arpeggios. Arpeggios are simply the notes of a chord played one at a time, in any
order, rather than all at the same time.
Arpeggios are similar to scales in a way because when we learn a scale we learn
a bunch of notes that fit over a sequence of chords in some key. When we play
these scale notes they will sound pleasant over those chords. On the other hand,
when we learn arpeggios we learn a bunch of notes that fit usually over a single
chord in a chord sequence. So generally we play arpeggios over a single chord in
a chord progression, and we change arpeggios whenever a chord changes.
Arpeggios are very useful when we improvise a melody over a chord
progression. We may use a particular scale for this progression and then if at any
point a chord comes up that doesn’t fit the key of the chord progression, our
scale notes would not fit over that chord and will sound unpleasant. In such
instance we can switch to playing arpeggios just for that single chord that
doesn’t fit the key, and it will sound really good.
One such example would be if you had a progression, let’s say: i — VII — VI
— V7 (which is a common progression used in flamenco music, also called:
Andalusian cadence). In the key of Am the chords would be: Am — G — F —
E7.
Here you can use A minor scale to solo and it would fit perfectly over Am, G
and F chords; but when E7 comes, just for that one chord you would switch to
playing E dominant 7 arpeggio — meaning the notes of E7 chord: E G# B D, in
any combination.
This is another, more beginnery, way to use arpeggios. The general tendency
however is to gradually move on to thinking and playing more chordally — to
treat each chord in a progression separately and play more chord notes in your
solos. This way your solos will sound more appropriate, more melodic, more
unique and less generic. Jazz players do this all the time.
If you think about it and analyze some of the most famous solos in history, for
example those in songs like: Hotel California, Stairway to Heaven or Sultans of
Swing, you will notice that one of the things that makes these solos so
captivating comes down to the note choices that are mostly arpeggios of the
chords playing in the background.
Arpeggios are also used to outline the harmony of a song in a way so that you
don’t have to play chords in the usual sense (all notes at the same time). You can
just pick out individual chord notes and play them as the progression moves,
usually in a certain pattern. This will make it sound almost as if you’re playing
the chords even though you’re just playing their notes individually. Another
good thing about arpeggios is that you can often get away with playing dissonant
chords that would otherwise sound awful if all their notes were played at the
same time.
In conclusion, learn how to use arpeggios on your instrument; learn where are
the notes and how to find them quickly, learn cool rhythmic patterns by which
you can play individual chord notes, and use them in your playing. When it
comes to soloing and improvisation, study the chords that you’re playing over,
analyze the context and the effect that each note has over a chord that is playing.
Notice how by focusing more on the chord notes your solos start to sound more
enticing and captivating.
Part 4
Whole note (a note held for the length of a standard bar in common time – more on
this soon)
Half note (held for half as long as a whole note)
Quarter note (held for a quarter of a whole note, or half of the half note)
Eighth note (an 8th of a whole note, or half of the quarter note)
Sixteenth note (a 16th of a whole note, or half of the 8th note).
These are the most common note values. There are also notes that are longer
than whole notes (but rarely used):
Double whole notes (held for the length of two bars in common time)
Longa (a note held for the length of four bars in common time)
Maxima (a note held for a total length of eight bars in common time)
And there are notes that are shorter than 16ths. Those are:
32nd note (a note with the value equal to the half of the 16th note)
64th note (half of 32nd)
128th note (half of 64th)
256th note (half of 128th)
It is not very common to encounter notes such as longa or maxima, or notes any
shorter than 16ths or 32nds except for sometimes in compositions played at a
slower tempo but with very fast runs.
At any point in a musical piece it is possible to play lots of notes (16th’s and
32nd’s) that sound really fast while still keeping time and retaining the slow
tempo of the piece (60 bpm or less). It is also possible to play only a few notes
(whole and half notes for example) even though the tempo of the tune is really
fast (120+ bpm). In both cases the tempo gives the overall subjective feel for the
speed of the tune.
In addition to basic divisions, any of these notes can become a dotted note (a
note with a simple dot ‘.’ next to it), which indicate that the length of the note is
1.5 times the normal length. For example:
Dotted whole note is one whole note + one half notes (or three half notes)
Dotted half note is one half note + one quarter note (or three quarter notes).
Dotted quarter note is one quarter note + one eight note (or three eight notes).
Dotted eight note is one eight note + one sixteenth note (or three 16ths).
Dotted sixteenth note is one sixteenth note + one 32nd note, etc.
There are also n-tuplets, such as triplets and pentuplets (or quintuplets), in which
some number of notes are fit evenly into a given amount of time. 8th note triplets,
for instance, fit 3 notes where there are usually two 8th notes (we’ll get to them
in a bit).
4/4 Time
In essence, 4/4 time tells us that there are four quarter notes in one bar. Here it is
represented visually:
Figure 16: In this time the beats have a value of one quarter note
Figure 17: Here the beats are still quarter notes — we’re just sub-dividing them by playing the
and’s in between
‘and’ or ‘+’ is how we pronounce the off-beats — which are notes in-between
the regular main beats.
And into sixteenth notes:
We have now subdivided the beat into four notes per beat, or sixteen notes per
one bar, in 4/4 time.
‘e’ is how we pronounce the off-beat between the main beat and the following
‘and’.
‘a’ is how we pronounce the off-beat between the ‘and’ and the following main
beat.
So we read like this: one ee and ah two ee and ah three ee and ah four ee and
ah, (new bar starts) one ee and ah two ee and ah, and so on.
To put this into practice and get a sense of it, here’s a very basic exercise you
can do. It starts very simple but it can get as complex as you want.
You’ll need a metronome for this. There are free digital app versions online if
you don’t have a physical one. First, choose a speed on the metronome, let’s say
60 bpm, and then play this exercise at an even tempo along with the metronome
click (which represents the beat). You can simply clap your hands at first or
make any percussive sound, or if you prefer you can play a single note or a
chord on your instrument.
If possible, use a metronome that has ‘accent’ feature. The accent will indicate
the start of each bar with a different ‘click’ sound. This will make it easier to
understand bars. Metronome click is there to help you notice whenever you fall
of the beat. You need to make sure that you’re playing on the beat and really
lock in with the metronome. The main benefit of the following practice is that it
helps you to understand how beat is divided, and you learn how to feel the pulse
and internalize time.
(I) First, here’s what you’re going to play:
1. Whole notes — clap once on the first beat of each bar. Do this for up to 4 bars.
2. Half notes — two claps per bar, one on beat 1 and the second on beat 3
3. Quarter notes — four claps per bar, one on every single beat (playing quarter
notes). See fig 16.
4. Eight notes — eight claps per bar, one on every beat plus on the “and’s” which are
in-between notes. See fig 17.
5. Sixteenth notes — sixteen claps per bar, which means four claps per every beat
(playing sixteenth notes). See fig 18.
1. Play a quarter note (one clap on beat 1), then two eight notes (two claps – one on
beat 2 and the second on the ‘and’ after the beat 2), four sixteenth notes (4 claps –
one on beat 3, second on ‘e’, third on ‘and’, fourth on ‘a’, and finally two eight notes
on beat 4.
1 2 and 3 e and a 4 and … and repeat for four bars.
2. Half note (beat 1 and 2), eight note (beat 3), quarter note (beat 4).
6/8 Time
6/8 is another very popular time signature. It tells the performer that there are 6
eight notes in one bar, or six beats per measure. Unlike 4/4 which is a simple
time, this is a compound time (more on this in the next section).
Figure 20: In this time a beat has a value of one eight note
This time signature has now defined the bar in a different way. Now there are 6
beats (6 evenly spaced metronome clicks in one bar), or six eight notes in one
bar. In other words, one beat is now an eight note and there are six of them in a
bar. This gives us the sense of the length of one bar and the overall feel of the
pulse – it’s pulsed in 8th notes.
How to Count in 6/8
Because of the different beat value, the notes are now counted in a different way.
Eight note — has a value of one beat and it is the basic unit for counting:
1 2 3 4 5 6, 1 2 3 4 5 6, 1 2 3 4 5 6, 1 2 3 4 5 6, etc.
(one two three four five six…)
If you play a note (or tap) on all six beats in a measure, you’re playing eight
notes. As you try this you can count (say out loud) each of the beats. You can
also accent beat 1 in each measure to get a better feel where the bar starts and
ends.
Dotted quarter note – We know that this note equals three 8th notes. Since
notes in 6/8 are grouped in two groups of three eight notes, you can count them
easily with dotted quarter notes.
1 2 3 4 5 6, 1 2 3 4 5 6, 1 2 3 4 5 6, 1 2 3 4 5 6, etc.
(one two three four five six…)
This means playing only on beats 1 and 4 as you count all the beats. So it would
be something like: Tap two three tap five six, Tap two three tap five six, etc.
Dotted half note – this note has a value of three quarter notes, which is six eight
notes, and that fills up our bar in 6/8. In other words, a dotted half note now fills
up the whole bar.
1 2 3 4 5 6, 1 2 3 4 5 6, 1 2 3 4 5 6, 1 2 3 4 5 6. etc.
(one two three four five six…)
You can practice it by counting each beat but playing only on beat 1 of each bar.
Sixteenth notes in 6/8 – On the other (shorter than one beat — spectrum, we
know that one eight can be divided into 2 sixteenth notes. So having 16th notes in
6/8 simply means adding the ands between each of the beats.
1 and 2 and 3 and 4 and 5 and 6 and, etc.
(one and two and three and four and five and six and…)
32nd notes in 6/8 – to divide even further is simple. We just add ‘e’ and ‘a’ like
with the 16th notes in 4/4.
1 e and a 2 e and a 3 e and a 4 e and a 5 e and a 6 e and a
Simple, Compound and Complex Time
Signatures
There are 3 most common types of time signatures:
1. Simple
2. Compound
3. Complex.
Simple time is the name given to musical time that is divisible by units of 2. In
other words, any time you are tempted to count “one two one two” you are
dealing with simple time. This includes time signatures such as 4/4 and 2/4.
For example, take a 4/4 measure. The measure has 4 beats, and they are divided
into two groups — each with a strong beat and a weak beat.
So the measure contains, in order, the following beats: strong, weak, strong,
weak.
When we count the measure, and clap our hands to it, we clap or put an accent
on the strong beats, and so the measure as a whole is divided into two parts. That
makes 4/4 an example of simple time.
Compound time is the name given to music time that is divisible by 3.
Whenever you count to a piece “one two three one two three” you are counting
to compound time. This includes time signatures such as 3/4 and 9/8.
Take for example 3/4 time. In 3/4, there are three beats in one measure —
Strong, weak, weak.
When we count it, we count it in 3, like a waltz — 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3. This makes
3/4 an example of a compound time.
This also includes 6/8 time, which we’ve already looked at. Both 6/8 and 3/4
time are very similar. The main difference is that in 6/8 you are playing two
groups of triplets, making it closer to 2/4 (where there are two quarter notes).
There will also be a difference in strong and weak beats.
In 6/8 there are 6 beats: Strong, weak, weak, strong, weak, weak.
Unlike 3/4, in 6/8 measure the second strong beat (underscored) you can say is
‘less strong’ than the first strong beat.
In this sense, 3/4 is closer to 9/8, which has 9 beats in one measure (three groups
of three) with the first beat being the strongest: Strong, weak, weak, strong,
weak, weak, strong, weak, weak.
Complex time is, simply, any time not divisible by 2 or 3. This includes time
signatures such as 5/4, 7/4 or 7/8.
Take, as an example, 5/4. This time signature is often viewed as: Strong, weak,
weak, strong, weak. This way it is divided into two parts: Strong, weak, weak
(3/4), and strong, weak (2/4).
3/4 + 2/4 equals 5/4, which is why this is a complex time signature— it consists
of 2 parts (two time signatures), that are unequal, and the measure is counted
first as a group of 3 and then as a group of 2. The first number—5, is neither
divisible by 3 nor 2.
In 7/8, there are seven eight notes usually subdivided into three parts: Strong,
weak, weak, strong, weak, strong, weak. Again, this is a complex time simply
because it consists of 3 time signatures (can you tell which ones?) that are
unequal, and the first number (7) is not divisible by 3 nor 2.
Musicians use different time signatures in all sorts of songs. Pop music is
generally in 3, 4, or 6. Jazz players, classical composers, and math rock players
use most all of them at different times. Time signatures essentially, are just
different ways that music arranges itself according to what is called for —
sometimes you play an ascending triad, sometimes descending; sometimes you
play in 4, sometimes in 7.
Accents, Syncopations,
Dynamics, Tempo Changes…
Once you know about the time of a piece, you need to know how to play with it.
It isn’t possible, not often, to make something interesting happen if all you’re
doing is playing the exact pulse of the music. Sometimes some notes are
intentionally missed out and off-beats are played to produce a compelling
rhythmic structure. This is where syncopation comes in.
Syncopation means simply playing in between the spaces that the time suggests
(we’ve already seen this in the previous exercise). Playing for longer or shorter,
taking rests, skipping beats, etc. This is the first step toward feeling and
expressing the groove of a song (even if that song is loosely organized).
It is also possible to create n-tuplets, polyrhythms and polymeters on the fly.
This takes more skill, and a great intuitive understanding of time, but the results
are worth the work it takes to be able to execute them — any drummer will tell
you that.
A player can adjust the speed or volume of the song, speeding up, slowing down
(either by fitting more notes into the same space or by adjusting the tempo of the
piece). This can be done compositionally or improvisationally.
Finally, a performer or composer can use dynamics to accent various parts of a
measure. This is often done in funk, blues, and jazz to highlight parts of the
measure that would otherwise fade to the background.
By drawing attention to dark parts of a measure, players can expose the groove
of the song for all that it implies — all of the false starts and half-resolutions, the
stutters, the hiccups, ghost notes, the things that make a groove groove.
So now we play an eight note which is then followed by two 16th notes (and a).
Adding Syncopation
Going one step further, we will now add syncopation, which is denoted by rests. By
incorporating rests into previous rhythmic blocks we get more fundamental rhythm units.
Rests in music are spaces of time during which there is an absolute silence – no note or
any percussive sound is being heard. There is a rest equivalent for all of the notes shown
so far: whole note rest, half note rest, quarter note rest, etc. (we talk more about rests in
my How to Read Music for Beginners book).
These examples are a little bit trickier to play and master mainly because we may not be
used to playing or accenting off-beats, but with some practice and patience they will
present no problem.
8th note rest – 16th note – 16th note audio example -> http://goo.gl/Gyt2Hx
13. 16th note rest, 16th note, and an 8th note
The opposite of the previous pattern. It is counted like this:
|1| e and (a) |2| e and (a) |3| e and (a) |4| e and (a)
Beat 1 is skipped (not heard or played), you play ‘e’ and ‘and’. The ‘and’ is an eight note
so it is held for the duration of (a) if you’re playing a pitched note. If you’re clapping or
tapping all this, then (a) is treated the same way as |1| — it’s not played.
16th note rest – 16th note – 8th note audio example -> http://goo.gl/si5qG2
14. 16th note rest, eight and a 16th note
A little bit trickier than the previous ones. We have a 16th note rest (25%) followed by an
8th note (50%) and a 16th note (25%). It is counted like this:
|1| e (and) a |2| e (and) a |3| e (and) a |4| e (and) a
‘e’ is an eight note here and if you’re playing a pitched note it needs to last until ‘a’.
16th note rest – 8th note – 16th note audio example -> http://goo.gl/5FeUXG
15. Dotted 8th note rest and a 16th note
Now we have a dotted 8th note rest and a 16th note. So we’re just playing on the last off-
beat ‘a’. It is counted like this:
|1| |e| |and| a |2| |e| |and| a |3| |e| |and| a |4| |e| |and| a
8th note rest . – 16th note audio example -> http://goo.gl/owmMgr
16. 16th note rest and a dotted 8th
The opposite of the previous one. Now a 16th rest is followed by a dotted 8th. It is
counted like this:
|1| e (and) (a) |2| e (and) (a) |3| e (and) (a) |4| e (and) (a)
In this bar the ‘e’ note is held for 75% of the bar while 1, 2, 3 and 4 are not played or
heard at all. If you’re playing a note with a pitch on ‘e’ then this note (since it is a dotted
eight note) is held for the duration of ‘and’ and ‘a’.
Here we have 8th note triplets but with an 8th note triplet rest on the main beats (1
2 3 4). It is counted like this:
|1| trip let |2| trip let |3| trip let |4| trip let
Note that like an 8th note triplet, one 8th note triplet rest is also 33,3333…% of
the beat. In music notation and on the staff 8th note triplet rest has the same
symbol as the regular 8th note rest but it is contained within the brackets denoting
triplets.
Also notice the subtle difference between this pattern, and pattern 12 and 13, and
how beat subdivisions are spaced out differently. This one sounds more like a
waltz:
Syncopated 8th note triplets audio example -> http://goo.gl/1RWGze
Timbre/Tone
A composer or performer can use note selection to build and release tension, to
create movement. They can also use, as we have seen, note duration — by
manipulating time, they are able to achieve all manner of complications. There
are, however, other ways of moving through musical space, other axes, other
tools, other vehicles. One of these is timbre or tone color.
Timbre and tone refer not to the pitch of a sound, and not to its volume, but to
what the sound sounds like. They are the character or the form of a sound, the
color or quality of a sound.
Though they are often used interchangeably, “timbre” and “tone” are sometimes
used to refer to different features of a sounds color.
In these cases, the timbre of a sound is indexed to whatever instrument the sound
is produced with — a violin’s A note is different from a saxophone’s A, and the
difference between those two sounds is the timbre.
The tone, on the other hand, is the specific tonal quality of the sound coming out
of that instrument, affected by the composition of the instrument, the technique,
the amplification and any effects used.
In general, the timbre or the tone of a sound (and here we are imagining that
those two things are the same) is one of the ways a composer or performer can
control the way a piece of music feels. Tension is built and released by way of
timbre just as much as by way of pitch or duration.
Dynamics
Dynamics refer to the volume of a sound, as well as to how that volume is
expressed (does it come on quickly, does it linger, etc.).
The dynamic movement in a piece of music — getting louder getting softer,
increasing or decreasing the sustain, attack or decay of the tones in that piece —
contribute to the overall sense of drama and tension, the propagate musical
movement, in just as profound a way as the timbre, the duration and the pitch of
the sounds do.
Playing with dynamics and phrasing (the physical way in which a music line is
phrased/played) is intrinsically related to what many call “playing with the feel”.
Drama
Music is a language, and a piece of music is a narrative. There is change, rising
and falling action. There are climaxes. There is development. There are periods
of tension and periods of release. There is drama.
It is necessary to use all of the tools at your disposal to create whatever kind of
drama you are trying to create. It is possible to remain mostly at the level of
harmony and melody, creating movement with note selection, moving and
changing harmonic material, even perhaps abandoning harmonic structures all
together (as in some free improvisation and modern classical music).
But it is also possible to use time, tone, timbre and dynamics to tell a story, to
move an audience by moving the sound — pushing air, pushing waves, pushing
feelings... Moving, changing, dramatizing.
Extended Techniques
It is worth mentioning, briefly, that there are ways of creating drama that go
beyond traditional techniques. It is always possible to play your instrument (or to
compose for an instrument) in ways that are non-standard, that were never in the
beginning intended for that instrument.
A saxophone player can play artificially high or can produce rich harmonics,
they can over-blow, they can breathe and whisper, they can speak or yell. A
guitarist can use a bow, can play muted notes or harmonics, can scrape the
strings (even using a tremolo bar is a kind of extended technique), can play
drums on guitar (check out some Tommy Emmanuel drum solos) or guitar like
piano. A piano player can insert objects into their strings, changing the timbre of
their instrument. There are always possibilities.
In some forms of music, most notably avant-garde, experimental, and “free”
music, extended techniques are used to manipulate the story that a piece of
music tells. But some of these techniques, such as (on the guitar) tremolo bar
use, effect use, and artificial harmonics are deeply a part of mainstream music,
and whatever the music or the instrument you play, understanding extended
techniques means having one more way of telling a story.
Part 6
That second task is what this section is about: letting you in on some of the
secrets of musical systems; showing you how musical elements and structures
make sense together; and getting you ready for the next step, which is a broader
perspective — a more advanced conversation about how to manipulate
theoretical structures in your own playing and writing. The point of this section
is not to get you the whole way there, only to get you moving in the right
direction.
To that end, we will discuss, first, a broad distinction between improvisation and
composition (with an eye toward thinking about how improvisers and composers
use music theory), second, a general taxonomy of music theory (or at least of
harmony as it is understood theoretically), and third, a set of musical ideas and
structures that are indispensable in your journey toward theoretical mastery.
What is a Composition?
We practicing musicians take for granted so many theoretical objects, and none
perhaps more than this one — composition. We assume that we know what it
means to compose something, and that what we think of as composition is what
everyone else thinks of as composition. We think there is an easy answer to the
question “What is a composer?” and that we know just how composers make use
of music theory.
It’s worth beginning with something simple. What is composition? What does it
mean to be a composer? At first glance, it looks like it’s just a matter of willful
creation: to compose is to create intentionally. And so, composing music (being
a composer) is just a matter of being someone who intentionally creates sound.
That, however, doesn’t really cover it.
First, there is non-compositional music (such as improvisation), which is also,
presumably created intentionally. And second, there is sound that is created
intentionally — such as honking a car horn — that we would never call music.
So there has to be two things added to what we have already said: 1. that
composers write things that are meant to be repeated, more or less exactly as
they are written; and 2. that compositions are more than mere sound.
The first of these things is simple enough — compositions are repeatable — and
at least at first blush this is what separates composers from improvisers. But the
second thing — that composed music is more than mere sound — is a little more
complicated.
And here is where music theory enters. Music, it is said, is not simply sound, but
organized sound. And while this definition is in some cases too simple to be true,
it serves here as a general guide. When we talk about the organization of sound
in a musical sense, what we are talking about is theoretical structures — most
basically, harmony, melody, and rhythm. These are the things that musicians
create, and are not simply sounds. We create organizations and structural
arrangements of sounds that are consonant or dissonant, that follow some
melodic order (however complex) and that occur in time (most often of a regular
pulse).
So this is what composers do — intentionally create repeatable musical
structures. And those structures can be discussed, analyzed, and even generated
by music theory.
Improvisation as Instantaneous
Composition
If composition is the intentional creation of repeatable musical structures, then it
should be easy enough to know how to think about improvisation. It should be
the same thing, only now, rather than being repeatable, it is meant to be played
only once.
But this is too easy. Surely, we can imagine a composer writing a piece that is
only meant to be played once; and this wouldn’t be improvisation. And all of
this takes for granted the idea that the music that improvisers improvise is the
same thing, or more or less the same, as the music that composers compose.
Improvisation, in general, resists the kind of theoretical analysis that was
designed for centuries for composition. This isn’t because improvised music
doesn’t have harmony, melody, and rhythm, but because it uses those things
differently than composition. The difference is all about time.
A composer has time — time to think, time to write, time to arrange and
rearrange, edit and re-edit. And this changes the way they work with music
theory. It’s like painting a portrait from a picture, which will never change and
never go away — composers can work and rework the very same parts of a piece
until what is left is a reflection of, in general, richly complex theoretical
structures.
But an improviser does not have time. Improvisation is often said to be
instantaneous composition, and while, as we are saying, it may be misleading to
call it a kind of composition, it certainly is instantaneous. This means that the
way an improviser works with theory is different. Rather than painting from a
photo, they are painting from a brief memory — a quick image that passes by
their mind. This means that they cannot pause and reflect on the way they’re
using theory; they simply have to use it, and they’ve got one chance to do so.
An improviser used theory in shorthand and mnemonic devices. What we mean
by that is that they have memorized various harmonic devices (and other
theoretical structures) and they know just how to use them, apply them, alter
them, and combine them. Much of the theoretical work in improvisation is done
behind the scenes and well beforehand — in the years or decades of practice and
study. This means that theory for improvisation isn’t quite the same animal as
theory for composition. It consists of all the same structures, but its use is
different.
Note Relativism
A rose may be a rose may be a rose, but a note is not a note. Not merely, that is.
There is so much more to an A440 than being a tone that sounds at 440 hertz. In
music, what matters far more than a tone’s absolute pitch is its relative value.
What that means is that an A may be different in this case than in that case. It
may, and likely will, serve different functions. And that is what makes a note —
its function, not its definition. Note relativism means that what a note is, what it
really is, is something that relies on other notes, and that its value is always
relative.
Let’s take an example. Let’s say I am playing in the key of E minor, and I play
an A minor chord. The A of that A minor is serving multiple purposes: it is the 1
note of the chord I am playing, which is a minor chord; it is the bass note of that
chord, against which all of the other notes I am playing are defined; and it is the
4th note in the E minor scale. All of these things define what that A is at that
particular time.
But now imagine that I am playing in Bb major, and I am playing a Dm7 chord.
I am still playing an A, only now it is different. It is the 5 note of the chord I am
playing, which is a min7 chord; it is not the bass note of that chord; and it is the
seventh note in the Bb major scale. It is entirely different and therefore its
function in these musical structures is fundamentally different.
The point is that notes are relative, and that this is the foundational truth of
harmony. To study music theory is not to study a system of immovable objects,
but to study a system that is always in movement, that is changing and becoming
new at each moment. That’s one of the things that makes it so hard to be a music
theorist — you are trying to capture something that fundamentally wants to
elude capture.
In the process of learning theory, one of the most important things you can
realize is that music is moving and that harmony is relative. Once you begin to
see that notes are different depending on their changing functions, it will be
easier to put yourself in the correct headspace.
1. Tonal
2. Modal
3. Polytonal
4. Atonal
Tonal Harmony
Most of the music in the West is what is called “Tonal” music, and it is in the
province of tonal harmony. Tonal music is music that has a tonic, or a key center
— a note that acts as the center of gravity for the piece or for the part of the
piece you’re talking about. And tonal harmony is how we understand the
harmony of tonal music — it makes sense of chords and scales relative to some
key center or tonic. Tonal harmony can be either: chordal, scalar or chromatic.
Chordal
Chordal music is music whose primary harmonic vehicle is the chord. We
analyze it by analyzing the way that the chords move and interact with one
another. The most basic unit in chordal music is the chord, and generally this
means that we are talking about triads and their relationships.
Scalar
Scalar music is music whose primary harmonic vehicle is the scale. We
understand this music by analyzing the way that notes and chords are derived
from the scales that contain them. The most basic unit of harmonic in scalar
music is a scale rather than a chord, the latter being derived as a member of the
former. This means that generally we are talking about some scale or mode (or
series of scales and modes) rather than some set of triads.
Chromatic
Chromatic music is similar in principle to scalar music, only the scale that is
used is the 12-tone chromatic scale. This means, in theory, that the music is free
to leave the space of tonality and move into atonal harmony (see atonal section
below), but in practice it is often tied to some center of gravity.
Polytonality
Polytonal harmony can be either tonal or modal. In polytonality, more than one
key center is established at a given time. This can occur tonally, as when more
than one note is used as a center of gravity, or it can be done with modal
harmony, when more than one mode is used at one time. In either case, the
resulting harmony is complex and often quite dissonant.
Atonal Harmony
In atonal harmony, there is no key center. This music, popularized in the west in
the 20th century by composers such as Arnold Schoenberg and Anton Von
Webern, treats all 12 tones as though they were centers of gravity. Privilege is
given to tones, not as they interact with some key center, but as they interact
with one another. This music is often difficult to listen to, but some of it is quite
beautiful.
Questions to Ponder
Now that we have begun to assemble the blocks of musical structures, it is time
to move to the next step. It is time to move toward the manipulation of those
structures. This is what advanced music theory is — a way of thinking about the
manipulation of musical structures. You already know the names of things; you
already know the beginnings of how they fit together; now it is time to take the
next and biggest step toward mastering those structures. This is a never-ending
process and will continue for the rest of your life.
While you begin this process, here are two things to think about: where harmony
begins; and the depth of the chromatic scale.
This is for intermediate and advanced players who want to learn to think
differently about music, with wider perspective.
While geared toward improvisation, it is certainly useful for the composing
artist. While derived largely from the history of jazz from 1959 forward, it also
provides suitable means to analyzing the harmonic structure of some of the most
important classical pieces from the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
We will begin by discussing and revising chord progressions, understood as the
activity and application of individual chords. We will then quickly move toward
discusses the principles of chord substitutions and reharmonization before
pausing for a lengthy conversation about improvising over chord progressions
(including, but not limited to, the relationship between chords and scales and the
chord-scale system of improvisation, now widely taught at universities such as
Berkelee).
That will end the conversation about what is generally known as “tonal
harmony”, and the final chapters will be dedicated to understanding ways of
moving beyond simple tonality — first, in terms of modal harmony as
pioneered by Miles Davis in jazz and Debussy in classical music; and second, in
terms of atonal music as pioneered by Ornette Coleman.
Special treatment will be given to what is sometimes called “free music”, which
is a form of improvisation inspired most often by the modal harmony of late
John Coltrane recordings and the atonal harmony of Ornette Coleman.
Finally, the chapter on atonality will close with a section on playing beyond
traditional musical categories (by focusing on timbre, volume, speed, density,
etc., rather than on harmony, melody, and rhythm) and a section on the spiritual
aspects of modal and atonal music.
Few things can give more lasting joy than the sustained meditation on advanced
music theory. Unlike basic theory, the world of advanced harmony is one of
interpretation and creativity. There are no clear answers, and there are very few
simple ways of understanding any of what we will discuss. Everything here
exists in shades of perspective.
What I am presenting here is one way of understanding the progression beyond
simple music theory, one way of thinking about how to move forward and
beyond the same musical patterns you have been practicing for what likely
seems like forever. This is the path to true creation, and it is paved with
uncertainty. For that reason, it is sometimes hard to make sense of where to go,
what to think. But if you allow yourself to become immersed in the stuff of
advanced music theory, than you will be rewarded with a lifetime of rich
creation. I invite you to put in the effort. It is worth it.
1. First, you begin with a progression — for instance, a ii-V-I in A Major. Those chords
are Bm-E7-AMaj.
2. Then, a progression is chosen, from which we will borrow the mathematical
structure. Let’s say we use another ii-V-I. We use the structure of that progression (a
fourth up and then a fifth down) to start on the iii of A major and end on the ii, which
will be the beginning of the first ii-V-I.
3. So the full progression will be iii-vi-ii-V-I, or C#m-F#m-Bm-E7-A Maj. More
complex progressions, such as this one, can be further combined with other
progressions by using it (or another progression) as the basis for extending
progressions (just like the ii-V-I here was used as the basis for extended the
progression we started with).
Chord Substitutions
When composers work with progressions, or when improvisers play over them,
they are generally thinking in terms of chord substitutions. A chord substitution
is when one chord is replaced by another, and it allows us to extend a
progression indefinitely.
Chord substitutions are at once the easiest thing to think about and the most
complicated. In the most basic sense, what a chord substitution is is a
reharmonization, and since reharmonizations are the foundations for melodic
variation, chord substitutions are the most basic way of generating new ideas
(both on the fly and in a composition). But they are also sometimes terribly
complicated, and performing them improvisationally can be extremely
challenging. Most of what advanced players think about when they are thinking
about improvising with a chord progression is something having to do with
chord substitutions.
We have already said that a chord substitution happens when we replace one
chord with another, different, chord that serves a similar function in the
progression. One very basic way of doing this is, as we have seen, to replace a
chord in a progression with another chord of the same family — a tonic for a
tonic, a dominant for a dominant, a subdominant for a subdominant. But there
are many other ways of substituting chords, some of which are much more
advanced.
For each way of substituting a chord, there is an opportunity to both extend a
progression compositionally (as we generate new progressions from an existing
progression) and a way to reharmonize a substitution improvisationally (as we
come up with new chords and melody lines to play over existing chord
progressions).
Beyond chord family substitution, there are a few other basic ways to substitute
chords. One of them we have already mentioned: tritone substitution. This is
when a dominant seventh chord is substituted a tritone apart from an existing
dominant seventh chord.
There is no tritone substitution equivalent for major and minor seventh chords,
but there is something that works for those chords in a similar way: A minor
triad or minor seventh can be substituted three half steps below a major triad or
major seventh, and a major triad or seventh can be substituted three half steps
above a minor triad or seventh. This is sometimes called a relative minor (or
major) substitution, and it almost always works well.
Beyond those simple methods of substituting chords, there are almost limitless
options. There are, however, a few basic rules. In essence, an easier way to show
chord substitutions methods is by dividing them into those that change and don’t
change the chord’s root.
Quality Subtraction
Another easy way to alter a chord without, usually, changing its root is to
subtract a quality from it. A min7 chord can become a min (triad), a 5 chord, or a
min7 chord with the 5th omitted. If you are dealing with an extended chord, then
you can always remove the extensions and end up with a 7th chord.
To summarize: the simplest kind of chord substitution is through quality addition
and subtraction. In essence or more qualities are added to or taken away from a
chord, and the resulting chord is put in place of the original. Another example, a
C7 can become a C9, or a C13 can become a Cadd13.
Quality Alteration
It is also possible to generate a new chord by altering the qualities that are
already in it. Notes can be raised or lowered, generally by a half-step. A 13
chord can become a 9(#11)(13) by raising the 11, or a min9 can become a
min7b9 by lowering the 9.
Family Alteration
The last way to change a chord without changing its root is to alter its family. In
general, as stated before, there are three families of chords — major chords,
minor chords, dominant chords.
You know which family you’re dealing with by looking at the 3 and the 7:
When it isn’t clear just think of the scale that includes that chord — if it has a
major 3rd and a minor 7th then it’s a dominant chord, etc..
A Maj6 chord is the only time things get confusing — this can be either major or
dominant, which just means you have more options when dealing with that chord.
Something similar is sometimes true of stacked fourth chords, but that is for another
day.
When we alter the family of a chord, we change it from major to minor, from
minor to dominant, or in any other way to move between families. The chord
stays the same except for the notes that would make it belong to a certain family.
For instance, a min9 becomes a 9 or a Maj9. In those cases, the root and the 5
stay the same.
Changing the Root
Inversion
You don’t always want the bass note of your chord to stay the same. Sometimes,
often times, the reason you’re substituting is to create new bass movement. In
these cases, you need to move the chord completely. The simplest way of doing
this is to invert it. You end up with all of the same notes only in a different order
and with a different bass note. Put the 3 on the bass end, for instance. This will
give you an entirely new chord to work with. For example, a CMaj7 can become
a Emb9.
It is worth pausing here for a moment. Between quality addition and subtraction,
quality alteration, family alteration, and inversion, there is a vast array of
possibilities. If you combine these techniques, you can generate almost limitless
new chords to work with. And this is almost always going to sound good.
The general rule when working with chord substitutions (at least the traditional
rule) is to make sure that the new chord has at least 2 notes that the old chord
had. If you do that, you can’t really go wrong. Even if you don’t do that, there
are plenty of cases where what you play will sound good.
It isn’t altogether uncommon for players to add and alter multiple qualities,
invert the resulting chord, and then subtract some qualities from that chord,
ending up with a sub chord that is completely different than the original (having
only 1, or sometimes no notes in common with it). Doing this can still sound
great, it just means you have to listen carefully and know when to reel it in and
come back to the original progression. As always with theory you have to learn
to use your ears as a guide.
Slash Chords
Similar in notation to inversions, slash chords are a great tool for chord
substitution. Whereas the inversions are written like this — Am7/C — denoting
in this case, C as the bass note, slash chords are written like this — Am7/Cm —
denoting in this case that an Am7 chord is being combined with a Cm chord so
that the Cm chord is on the “bottom.”
This way of combining chords is important for polytonality, and will be
discussed again later. For now we can rest at saying that it is possible to add a
chord to a pre-existing chord and end up with a chord substitution that is a slash
chord. This is a way of altering a chord without adding, subtracting, or changing
any of its qualities, although it can be combined with any of those techniques.
Tritone Substitution
A special kind of substitution is the tritone substitution. In this case, a dominant
chord is replaced by another dominant chord a tritone away. For example, a C7
becomes an F#7.
Chord Addition
Rather than alter or add to an existing chord, it is possible to simply add chords
to a progression to achieve a result similar to straight forward substitution. This
is still a form of substitution, only it is a progression substitution rather than a
chord-by-chord substitution.
The chord or chords that are chosen to be added are generally ones that help
bridge between one chord and another, but it is possible to add chords that serve
their own distinct harmonic purposes and even temporarily change the key
center of the song.
An example of a simple chord addition is as follows: given a iv-V-I in G major,
you can simply add a ii chord at the beginning, leading into the iv chord with
another subdominant chord. Or, alternatively, you could add a tonic chord at the
beginning — for instance, a vi chord. You could also choose to add a tritone sub
between the V and the I, ending up with something like this: vi-iv-V7-bII7-I,
playing the first four chords twice as quickly as originally written to be sure to
take up the same amount of time.
Chord Subtraction
The opposite of chord addition, but cousin to it in principle, is chord subtraction.
With subtraction, we again replace one progression (or section of a progression)
with a new one. We can, if we choose, keep the chords unaltered, so that the
only change we are making is that we are eliminating certain chords from the
progression.
This is usually done so that what remains are the most important chords
harmonically — the I and i chords, the V chords, etc. It is possible, however, to
retain only subdominant chords and non-I tonic chords. This makes the
progression far less stable and far more harmonically ambiguous, which is
sometimes desirable as it leaves more to the listener’s imagination and provides
more room for interpretation on the part of a soloist.
Series Substitution
A special case of progression substitution is series substitution, in which a
specific harmonic series or cycle is substituted for another, usually more
common, series. For instance, there may be a longer, quicker, more complicated
series that replaces a ii-V-I.
A famous example of this is the Coltrane cycle. In the Coltrane cycle, pioneered
by John Coltrane on his “Giant Steps” album, a ii-V-I is replaced by a series that
moves quickly through three tonal centers, each a major third apart. For instance,
a ii-V-I in C major (Dm-G7-CMaj) is replaced with: Dm-Eb7-AbMaj-B7-EMaj-
G7-CMaj.
In that progression, the tonic chords are AbMaj, EMaj, and CMaj. These three
tonal centers are cycled through quickly in the same time it takes normally to
move through a ii-V-I in one tonal center. In general, these types of progression
substitutions are used to add complexity to a piece, although that isn’t always
true.
Modal Reduction
Modal reduction, pioneered by Miles Davis, is a special kind of chord
subtraction in which all of the chords are subtracted except the ones needed to
define the modal centers of the piece. A modal center is different from a tonal
center in that rather than identifying the root or tonic of a chord progression it
identifies the harmonic center of a scale.
So the chords Bm, DMaj, E7, and AMaj all share the same modal center, not
because AMaj is the tonic chord, but because they all contain notes that are
found in the A major scale. In this case, those chords might all be eliminated
except for the AMaj chord. Alternatively, if they were all eliminated except for
the Bm, then the modal center would be the B minor scale or perhaps the B
dorian mode. In this way, reducing a progression modally can encourage the
soloists to play and think in certain ways.
In a modal reduction, it is common for all of the chords except the I and V
chords (and sometimes just the I chords) to be eliminated, so that what is left is
simply a skeleton that can be filled in by a scale. The point here is not to create
harmonic movement with a chord progression, which moves away from and
back toward a tonic chord, but to allow the players a maximum amount of
freedom within a particular key by establishing a modal center that can be filled
in, changed, and stretched in a variety of ways.
This is the foundation of modal harmony, which will be discussed later. For now
it is important only to know that by reducing a chord progression to its essential
skeleton, a new kind of harmonic freedom and looseness can be achieved. This
was the way of modal jazz in the 1950s, and it changed the way jazz players
thought about chords and solos forever.
Modal Substitution
Once you have established a progression as a series of modal centers rather than
tonal centers, the possibilities for chord substitution open up dramatically. Modal
substitution is a way of substituting one chord for another when both of those
chords are contained in the same scale or mode.
There will be more to say about this later, in the chapter on modal harmony, but
just now it is easy to see how this works in principle — one chord, for example a
Cm7, is understood relative to some modal center, for instance D Phrygian, and
so any chord contained in D Phrygian is allowable as a substitution chord for
Cm7. Each time this happens, it is as though a modal center is being “cut” and
inverted — some notes of the scale are being eliminated and what is left is
rearranged into some new chord.
The possibilities for reharmonization here are nearly endless, particularly when
you start to consider the different ways a single progression can be harmonized
modally (for instance, that same Cm7 chord can be seen as part of C Phrygian or
B Aeolian rather than D Phrygian).
Modal Interchange
Finally, there is modal interchange. This is not so much a technique for chord
substitution as it is for modal center substitution, but the result is still that one
chord or set of chords is replaced by another. What we mean by modal center
substitution is that rather than using a new chord that shares the same modal
center as the old one, we replace the modal center completely, even sometimes
in a way that makes the music altogether dissonant, and then generate a chord
based on that new modal center.
We will cover this again soon, but for now you can see the way that doing this
opens up the harmony of a song completely to its limit. There is virtually
nowhere you cannot go with Interchange and modal substitution when they are
combined.
Polytonal Substitutions
A polytonal substitution occurs when a chord or part of a chord from some other
key center is used in a progression. This is often done by way of slash chords.
For instance, a C7 becomes a C7/DMaj
A Word on Chromaticism
Chromaticism is an important concept in modern composition and
improvisation. It is essential to understanding both jazz and classical music since
the second half of the 20th Century. There are many applications of
chromaticism, and we will speak of it again when we talk about improvising
over a chord progression, but here — with respect to chord substitutions — it
plays a role as well.
Chromaticism, simply and generally, is the introduction of the 12-tone scale into
the harmony of a song, chord, scale, etc. In general, this means altering notes,
scales, or chords by a half-step up or down.
In the case of chord substitution, this can take the form of quality alteration in which
one or more of the qualities of a diatonic chord are altered chromatically.
In the case of chord addition, it can take the case of adding a chord a half-step above
or below an existing chord.
In the case of modal substitutions, you can sometimes move an entire chord
(contained in the scale being used) up or down chromatically. This is a version of
what is called “sliding,” which will be discussed later.
Inversions
You may want to change the bass movement of the progression by altering the
bass notes of one or more chords through inversion. This is not as difficult as it
seems, in practice. It is just a matter of taking one of the notes in the chord that
isn’t the root and putting it in the bass.
Beginning where we left off in the last example: Am9 becomes Am9/C, which is
CMaj7add13, or if you like, CMaj13 (picking up a 9 and 11).
Tritone Substitution
To perform a tritone substitution, simply replace a dominant chord with the same
chord a tritone above or below it. B7 becomes F7.
Modal Substitution
Modal substitution can be a little tricky to figure out, but once you do it is as
simple as the rest. First, you pick a scale — in this case, we will assume A
Dorian. Then, you derive a chord from that scale — we might pick D7sus4 —
and replace some chord in the progression with that one. A natural choice might
be D7, but it can be any of them, for instance, the F#.
Polytonal Substitution
With polytonal substitution, we begin with the key of the song and then add
another key, taking some of the notes of that new key and adding them to the
progression.
Taking E Minor as the key, we can add another key — G Minor — and add
notes from that key to the chords: Am becomes perhaps Amb9, or maybe even
Cm/Am, a polychord.
Chromatic substitution
To substitute using all 12 tones, just take some notes from outside of the scale
and add them to the progression.
GMaj7 becomes G#m9b5 (still containing, in this case, the B and D from the
original chord, but adding G# and A#).
Series Substitution
To substitute with a series, replace perhaps the first ii-V7-I with some other
series, maybe IV-V-I, iii-vi-ii-V-I, the Coltrane cycle, or some less common
series such as iiim13-IV7b5-bii7-IMaj7.
Improvising Over Chord
Progressions
Once you understand how to apply harmonic theory to extend and manipulate
the harmony (the chord structure) of a piece, the next step is to learn to use those
harmonic manipulations to generate melody lines in and over that piece. This
can be done either compositionally, but the way we are introducing it here is the
way that jazz improvisers think about the issue. We will discuss it here in terms
of improvisation, but know that it is possible to apply all of the same principles
to composition.
Chord Tones
The foundation of traditional jazz improvisation (think bebop) is chord tones.
Chord tones are, simply, the notes of a 7th chord. Each degree of a scale has a 7th
chord attached to it, and each 7th chord has four chord tones (the four notes of
that chord). These 4 notes, which will change depending on the chord you are
playing over, are the basis for the melodies that you create over that chord. In the
case of a 6th chord (or any other chord that doesn’t contain a 7th chord) the chord
tones are simply the notes of that chord.
Chord tones are used to create improvised or composed melodies over a set of
chord changes. In pre-modal jazz in particular, the lines that are played in a song
are tied directly to the movement of its chords — for each new chord, there is a
new set of chord tones, and those are the notes that are used to create melodies.
This is akin to arpeggiating the chords of a song as they pass in different ways to
create novel melodies.
Joe Pass was known to have said “when the chord changes, you change,” and
that has always been the rule of (a certain kind of) jazz improvisation and
composition, as well as a technique used by classical composers, rock players,
country players, and virtually all modern western musicians.
Arpeggiating the chords in a progression is the foundation of melody as we now
know it in the west, and it is responsible for everything from the most complex
tonal jazz arrangements to the simplest, catchiest pop songs.
Playing the chord tones of 7th chords is the way that jazz players understand the
root of tonal improvisation. It is not the only technique they use, not at least all
by itself, and certainly not in modern jazz (after Miles Davis), but it accounts for
the basic understanding of single-note harmony in jazz.
Extensions
You may be thinking that chord-tone-based melodies seem too easy and simple,
even to the point of being reductive. You may hear what, for instance, Charlie
Parker did, and know that he wasn’t just focusing all of his energy on four tones
for each chord. This is of course true. There are many ways great players achieve
color and variation, even if they are using the traditional method of
improvisation that tells them to focus on chord tones. One of them is chord
substitutions, which we will discuss again next. Another is chromaticism, which
will be discussed later in this chapter.
But maybe the simplest thing improvisers can do is play the extensions of
whatever chord they are playing over. When you’re assembling a chord, an
extension is, as you likely know, any of the notes beyond the 7th that you get to
by ascending some scale in 3rds. In other words, they are the 9th, the 11th, the 13th,
and their alterations.
By playing an extension, you are playing a note that isn’t a chord tone but that is
a tone in a chord of that same root that contains those chord tones. In other
words, you are playing a note that is in an extended chord based on the same
note that the 7th chord you are playing over is based on. There are multiple ways
of doing this, each with different effects, but the general idea is the same — by
opening up the extensions of a chord you allow yourself more melodic freedom
and open the door to subtler and complex harmonic colors. If you have ever
listened to Bill Evans, he was a master of this.
One way of playing extensions is to use them to get from one chord tone to
another. This is a more traditional way, and it was used in jazz as early as the
bop years. This way of using extensions treats them as tones to pass through
rather than to land on, and so it still treats the chord tones as primitive. The other
way of seeing and playing extensions is to open them up fully, allowing yourself
to begin and end phrases on extensions.
This is a way of doing away with the old method of treating chord tones as the
essential building blocks of all melody, and it is decidedly modern (hitting its
stride in the late 50s). Opening chord tones up completely was in many ways an
invention of John Coltrane, and it led him in some respects to his modal and free
jazz periods.
Chord-Scales
When you are trying to move beyond chord tones and into a vaster, more wide
open, even more ambiguous harmonic space, there are two basic ways of
proceeding.
As we have seen, you can:
1. Play extensions of the chords in the progression, allowing you to move beyond the
(usually) four chord tones for each chord.
2. You can substitute chords, allowing you to open new chord tones (and extensions)
that were previously unavailable.
Both of these methods, however, even when they are combined, represent only
one way of thinking about moving beyond chord tones. They are both chordal in
nature, by which I mean they are both treating the chords of the progression as
isolable, fundamental, immutable units, which can be altered, extended, and
even substituted for, but which are still the sole foundations for your melodic
improvisation or composition.
This way of thinking about a chord progression is old (hundreds of years old in
classical music and as old as the earliest bebop in jazz) and it is therefore time-
tested. But it is limiting. At its core, it consists of the idea that to play over a set
of chords means basically arpeggiating those chords (playing chord tones) or
their substitutions and extensions. And that is more or less the foundation of
what we think of as melody, or at least it has been for most of the modern era.
There is, however, another way of seeing things. Rather than treating a chord as
an immutable object, it is possible to see that chord as a member of something
larger. In modal music, this means seeing it as nothing but a cutting of a larger
scale, and so often times the chord indicates nothing but a particular scale or
mode to be played (paying no attention to specific chord tones).
We will have more to say about pure modal harmony later, but even in tonal
harmony (chord-based harmony) it is possible to move in this direction. It is
possible to see a scale as part of a chord that is being written down or played. To
use a scale in this way means getting past seeing a chord as a map that you have
to follow and beginning to see it as an indicator of a larger harmonic structure.
Enter chord-scales. A chord-scale is a scale that is mapped to a chord (and a
chord that is then mapped to a scale). Playing a chord scale is a way of playing a
chord by playing a larger harmonic structure (a scale, usually consisting of seven
notes), and that means that it extends the harmony of the chord, but without
thinking about an extension and not necessarily thinking about a substitution.
A chord-scale extends the harmony of a chord in any number of directions by
finding a scale that includes all of the notes of the notated chord and then
mapping that scale onto the chord, giving the player or composer all of the notes
of the scale to work with. The chord is no longer thought of in isolation, but is
now part of something larger. The harmonic landscape is freer than in strict
chordal harmony, since there are more notes to choose from at any given time.
This allows for more melodic variation. Since there are multiple chord-scales
available for most chords (due to the fact that most chords can “fit” into the
notes of more than one scale), there is even more variety.
You come to a chord — an FMaj7 for instance. Rather than seeing the four notes of
that chord (F, A, C, E) as the foundation for your melody line, you go in search of a
chord-scale.
You find a scale (or scales) that contains FMaj7. Even if we limit ourselves to scales
whose root is F, there is more than one option. For instance, F Ionian contains those
notes. F Lydian also contains them. The 7th mode of the harmonic minor scale, F
Lydian #2, also contains those notes.
You can also produce any number of synthetic scales by taking one of those three
scales and altering the second, fourth, or sixth notes of them. You are left with
multiple scales to choose from.
You will, depending on how long you have to sit on this one chord, potentially play
more than one of them. Assuming that you only have a beat or two, however, you
will likely choose one of those scales and use it to create a melody.
By doing that, you will have chosen a chord-scale, a unit formed by the mapping
of, for instance, an F Lydian scale onto an FMaj7 chord. While you are on the
FMaj7 chord, you can then play any of the notes of the F Lydian scale — F, G,
A, B, C, D, E. And that’s how it works.
The magic of chord-scales is most evident in two cases:
1. When the chords are moving quickly and thinking about chord tones, extensions,
leading tones, and substitutions is made difficult (or impossible). In these cases,
having memories a few chord scales for each common chord makes playing through
the changes breezy.
2. When the chords are moving slowly enough that it is possible to use more than one
chord-scale over a single chord. In these cases, a tremendous amount of tonal
variation can be achieved without ever having to do very much in the way of
calculation.
1. Using the 12-tone chromatic scale to alter a chord or a scale to achieve some kind of
variation.
2. It can also mean discarding chords and scales altogether to play as outside as
possible.
The first of these two uses is common in tonal music, and the second is common
in atonal music. Tonal chromaticism is in some sense less pure form of
chromaticism than atonal chromaticism — in the way that it is still tied to a
chord or scale that is more restrictive than the 12 tone scale. But that doesn’t
mean it isn’t a powerful tool.
A rather conservative way to use chromaticism in tonal music is the way
chromatics were used in bop. In the heyday of bebop, it was quite common to
use a chromatic run to get from one place to another, in between arpeggios of
chords. In a similar vein, a chromatic addition can be used as a passing or
leading tone before or in between notes of an arpeggio or chord. This amounts to
adding a note above or below (by a half-step) a note in the scale or chord you are
using.
Bop players also made synthetic scales consisting of more than 7 notes, now
called bebop scales. These scales were designed to allow the player to play
ascending or descending and end up playing a chord tone on every strong beat
while playing other notes, sometimes chromatic notes, in between them. They
would often begin with a diatonic scale, such as a major scale, and add one
chromatic note in between two of the existing notes of that scale, such as
between the major 6th and major 7th, or between the major 2nd and major 3rd.
It is possible to use some of these bebop techniques to achieve more “outside”
harmonic effects. Beginning with a chord sub, for instance, that already contains
non-diatonic notes, and then altering or adding to that chord or its extensions
chromatically, allows you to end up with an arpeggio that is far-from-intuitive
but that may still sound great.
It is also a common practice to begin with a common chord-scale (a C Ionian
mapped onto a CMaj chord for instance) and then add to and alter that chord-
scale chromatically (perhaps flattening the 9th and adding a note between the 5th
and 6th notes of the scale, ending up with a synthetic scale that “works” with a
CMaj chord but sounds quite exotic).
In general, few things in music are more powerful than the chromatic scale. It is
so powerful that we have invented seven-note scales to restrain us and reign in
the chromatic scale, in a way. It would be easy enough to say “play one of these
12 notes” at every point in time, but most of us would be entirely lost by this.
However, the judicious use of chromaticism to alter, add to, and even
temporarily replace a chord or chord-scale can be the difference between staying
indoors and feeling the fresh breeze.
Polytonality
A conclusion which we can draw so far is that Tonal harmony itself can be:
1. Chordal
2. Scalar
3. Chromatic in nature
Modal Substitutions
We have already mentioned modal substitutions. These are part of the heart of
modal music. When there is a chord progression, the traditional method for
harmonic substitution is to alter, add to, and invert the existing chords, resulting
in new chords that share important chord tones with the old ones. In this way, we
are sure to end up with a set of changes that functions in the same way, or in
much the same way, as the old one — functions, that is, tonally. That way of
substituting chords is based on the function of a chord within tonal harmony (vis
a vis a tonal center). The idea is that the new chord has a similar function as the
old one.
There is, however, another way of going about substituting a chord. If, rather
than seeing each chord as having a particular function with respect to a tonic,
and each note of each chord having a particular function with respect to a root,
we see instead all of the notes as being inside (or outside) of some scale or series
of scales, then the game is different. We can now, since the chords are simply
cuttings of a larger scale or mode, replace that chord with any other chord that is
also a cutting from that same scale or mode. If we see an Am7 chord, and we
assume for the time being that it is part of a G Dorian scale (or A Phrygian) then
we can replace it with any chord also contained in that G Dorian scale (such as,
for instance, a Gm13sus4 chord.
The artistry of this sort of substitution is in two things:
1. The choice of modal center (the scale being used). At any given time, there are
multiple scales that include the chord written down, either in isolation or including
the chords around it in the progression, and so deciding which scales to use at that
point in the progression is a matter of taste.
2. The choice of a chord to be used within that scale. I chose, in the example above, a
Gm13sus4 chord, but I could have just as easily chosen an FMaj11 chord, or any one
of a number of other chords. Deciding which one to use is a matter of overall
harmonic color, and is often done by listening to the melodic content of the music as
one chord moves to the next one.
Modal Interchange
Modal substitution is the way that a modal player or composer opens the
harmony of a song to allow for maximum harmonic freedom (and melodic
variation). Playing single note lines over modal chords is as easy as playing any
of the notes in the scale you have chosen at that time (and again involves a
certain amount of artistry in making judicious decisions about which notes to
select — Miles Davis was the master of this). But sometimes a player or
composer wants even more flexibility. Enter modal interchange.
Modal interchange is a kind of substitution whereby the scale being used is
swapped out for another scale — any other scale — of the same root. And since
every seven-note scale has seven modes, each with their own roots, there are
theoretically seven different notes for each scale that can be used to anchor a
new set of scales. All you need to do is pick one of those roots and play a scale
— any scale you choose — beginning with that note. Then, new chords can be
introduced based on that new scale (and its available modes). Modal interchange
was used to great effect by John Coltrane on the album “A Love Supreme”.
Chromatic Sliding
Miles Davis was known for a particular kind of scalar substitution in modal
music. The technique is called “sliding,” and it involves playing the exact scale
you are using currently, only one half-step up or down, and then returning to the
scale you were using. It is a useful technique for generating tension and creating
novel melodic ideas.
Polymodality
What polytonal music is to tonal music, polymodal music is to modal music.
Polymodality is the use of more than one scale at the same time to anchor the
harmony of the piece. One example comes from John Coltrane: a scale (F major
for instance) is used as the modal center of an improvisation, but at the very
same time, two other scales a major 3rd above and below that scale are also used
(in this case, A major and C# major). The scales are all used to create melodies,
sometimes one after another and sometimes within the same phrase. Chords are
borrowed from all of the scales, resulting in a harmonic network that is complex
and ambiguous.
Atonality
Finally, we arrive at atonal music. Atonal music can be seen as one of two
things:
1. The natural extension of tonal harmony, in which polytonality is taken to its limit;
2. The most complete version of modal harmony, in which the 12-tone scale is the
“mode” being used.
In the first way of looking at it, atonality is the denial of tonality by way of its
multiplication. “Atonal” means “without a key center,” but it is impossible to
conceive of music that is without harmonic organization in the strictest sense.
The limit of polytonality, however, approaches the lack of a key center by
establishing so many small centers that the music never has a change to congeal
around a single tonic (or even a set of tonics).
The second way of seeing atonality is simpler — it is modal music in which all
12 tones are used to define the scale being used. On this model, atonal harmony
simply treats all 12 tones equally and democratically, allowing relationships to
emerge between them as the music progresses.
It is important to note that atonal does not mean without rules. There is such a
thing as free music (to be discussed briefly) but, for instance, the through-
composed atonal music of the early-to-mid 20th Century (often called “serialism”
and pioneered by Schoenberg and Weber, among others) was a rule-governed as
Baroque music (and perhaps as mathematical as well!).
Chromatic Playing
The easiest way for most people to approach atonal playing and composing is to
think of it through the chromatic scale. Seeing the chromatic scale as the
foundation of the music (rather than any 5 or 7-note scale) is a way of treating all
12 tones democratically. What emerges out of a space such as this is very many
smaller relationships between notes and chords — relationships that can be seen
either as polytonal or as modal in the most absolute sense.
It is worth practicing this kind of playing, in which the harmony of the music is
restrained only by one scale and includes all of the notes of Western harmony. It
sounds as though this sort of music is easier to compose or improvise, but doing
so with any kind of lyricism requires great skill (and an impressive ear), and
demands practice.
A Simple and Effective Guide to Understanding and Reading Music with Ease
(Music Theory Mastery Book 2)
www.amazon.com/dp/B071J4HNR5
Guitar for Beginners
PMS Exercise
1. G Dorian – PMS is F Major
2. F# Mixolydian – PMS is B Major
3. E Phrygian – PMS is C Major
4. A# Aeolian – PMS is C# Major
5. G Lydian – PMS is D Major
6. D Locrian – PMS is Eb Major
7. B Ionian – PMS is B Major
8. Db Mixolydian – PMS is Gb Major