This document discusses political behavior and impression management in organizations. It identifies several techniques for impression management, such as conformity, favors, excuses, apologies, self-promotion, enhancement, flattery, and exemplification. While some politicking can help managers get things done, behaviors should be evaluated on whether they are ethical, serve utility, and conform to standards of equity and justice. Powerful individuals are more vulnerable to unethical behavior as they are better able to justify self-serving actions. Managers should develop expert power through competence to gain influence and avoid disempowering employees. Politically astute individuals tend to be more successful in organizations.
This document discusses political behavior and impression management in organizations. It identifies several techniques for impression management, such as conformity, favors, excuses, apologies, self-promotion, enhancement, flattery, and exemplification. While some politicking can help managers get things done, behaviors should be evaluated on whether they are ethical, serve utility, and conform to standards of equity and justice. Powerful individuals are more vulnerable to unethical behavior as they are better able to justify self-serving actions. Managers should develop expert power through competence to gain influence and avoid disempowering employees. Politically astute individuals tend to be more successful in organizations.
This document discusses political behavior and impression management in organizations. It identifies several techniques for impression management, such as conformity, favors, excuses, apologies, self-promotion, enhancement, flattery, and exemplification. While some politicking can help managers get things done, behaviors should be evaluated on whether they are ethical, serve utility, and conform to standards of equity and justice. Powerful individuals are more vulnerable to unethical behavior as they are better able to justify self-serving actions. Managers should develop expert power through competence to gain influence and avoid disempowering employees. Politically astute individuals tend to be more successful in organizations.
This document discusses political behavior and impression management in organizations. It identifies several techniques for impression management, such as conformity, favors, excuses, apologies, self-promotion, enhancement, flattery, and exemplification. While some politicking can help managers get things done, behaviors should be evaluated on whether they are ethical, serve utility, and conform to standards of equity and justice. Powerful individuals are more vulnerable to unethical behavior as they are better able to justify self-serving actions. Managers should develop expert power through competence to gain influence and avoid disempowering employees. Politically astute individuals tend to be more successful in organizations.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
Causes and Consequences of Political Behavior
Factors Contributing to Political Behavior
How Good Am I at Playing Politics?
Impression Management Conformity Agreeing with someone else’s opinion to gain his or her approval is a form of ingratiation. Example: A manager tells his boss, “You’re absolutely right on your reorganization plan for the western regional office. I couldn’t agree with you more.” Favors Doing something nice for someone to gain that person’s approval is a form of ingratiation. Example: A salesperson says to a prospective client, “I’ve got two tickets to the theater tonight that I can’t use. Take them. Consider it a thank-you for taking the time to talk with me.” Excuses Explanations of a predicament-creating event aimed at minimizing the apparent severity of the predicament is a defensive IM technique. Example: A sales manager says to her boss, “We failed to get the ad in the paper on time, but no one responds to those ads anyway.” Apologies Admitting responsibility for an undesirable event and simultaneously seeking to get a pardon for the action is a defensive IM technique. Example: An employee says to his boss, “I’m sorry I made a mistake on the report. Please forgive me.” Self-Promotion Highlighting one’s best qualities, downplaying one’s deficits, and calling attention to one’s achievements is a self-focused IM technique. Example: A salesperson tells his boss, “Matt worked unsuccessfully for three years to try to get that account. I sewed it up in six weeks. I’m the best closer this company has.” Enhancement Claiming that something you did is more valuable than most other members of the organizations would think is a self-focused IM technique. Example: A journalist tells his editor, “My work on this celebrity divorce story was really a major boost to our sales” (even though the story only made it to page 3 in the entertainment section). Flattery Complimenting others about their virtues in an effort to make oneself appear perceptive and likeable is an assertive IM technique. Example: A new sales trainee says to her peer, “You handled that client’s complaint so tactfully! I could never have handled that as well as you did.” Exemplification Doing more than you need to in an effort to show how dedicated and hard working you are is an assertive IM technique. Example: An employee sends e- mails from his work computer when he works late so that his supervisor will know how long he’s been working.
The Ethics of Behaving Politically
Although there are no clear-cut ways to differentiate ethical from unethical
politicking, there are some questions you should consider. For example, what is the utility of engaging in politicking? Sometimes we do it for little good reason. Finally, does the political activity conform to standards of equity and justice? Sometimes it is difficult to weigh the costs and benefits of a political action, but its ethicality is clear. Unfortunately, powerful people can become very good at explaining selfserving behaviors in terms of the organization’s best interests. They can persuasively argue that unfair actions are really fair and just. Our point is that immoral people can justify almost any behavior. Those who are powerful, articulate, and persuasive are most vulnerable to ethical lapses because they are likely to be able to get away with unethical practices successfully. When faced with an ethical dilemma regarding organizational politics, try to consider whether playing politics is worth the risk and whether others might be harmed in the process.
Summary and Implications for Managers
If you want to get things done in a group or an organization, it helps to have
power. Here are several suggestions for how to deal with power in your own work life: ● As a manager who wants to maximize your power, you will want to increase others’ dependence on you. You can, for instance, increase your power in relation to your boss by developing knowledge or a skill she needs and for which she perceives no ready substitute. But you will not be alone in attempting to build your power bases. Others, particularly employees and peers, will be seeking to increase your dependence on them, while you are trying to minimize it and increase their dependence on you. The result is a continual battle. ● Few employees relish being powerless in their job and organization. Try to avoid putting others in a position where they feel they have no power. ● People respond differently to the various power bases. Expert and referent power are derived from an individual’s personal qualities. In contrast, coercion, reward, and legitimate power are essentially organizationally derived. Competence especially appears to offer wide appeal, and its use as a power base results in high performance by group members. The message for managers seems to be “Develop and use your expert power base!” ● An effective manager accepts the political nature of organizations. By assessing behavior in a political framework, you can better predict the actions of others and use that information to formulate political strategies that will gain advantages for you and your work unit. ● Some people are significantly more politically astute than others, meaning that they are aware of the underlying politics and can manage impressions. Those who are good at playing politics can be expected to get higher performance evaluations and, hence, larger salary increases and more promotions than the politically naïve or inept. The politically astute are also likely to exhibit higher job satisfaction and be better able to neutralize job stressors. ● Employees who have poor political skills or are unwilling to play the politics game generally relate perceived organizational politics to lower job satisfaction and self-reported performance, increased anxiety, and higher turnover