Clean Air Plan of Cambodia-Eng
Clean Air Plan of Cambodia-Eng
PREFACE ........................................................................................................................................ i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................ii
LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................... v
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................vii
ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................. ix
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. x
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Air Quality Management in Cambodia ............................................................................. 2
1.2 Health Impacts from Air Pollution.................................................................................... 5
1.3 Air pollution and the Multiple Benefits of Mitigation ...................................................... 6
1.4 Objective of Developing the Clean Air Plan of Cambodia ............................................... 7
1.5 Methodology for Developing the National Clean Air Plan .............................................. 8
1.6 Stakeholder Engagement................................................................................................... 9
1.7 Challenges identified during the formulation of the Clean Air Plan ................................ 9
2. STATUS OF AIR QUALITY AND SOURCES OF EMISSIONS ....................................... 10
2.1 Status of Air Quality in Cambodia .................................................................................. 10
2.2 National Total Emission.................................................................................................. 12
2.3 Air Pollution .................................................................................................................... 14
2.3.1 Particulate Matter .................................................................................................... 14
2.3.2 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) ............................................................................................... 16
2.3.3 Nitrogen Dioxide (NOx) .......................................................................................... 17
2.3.4 Carbon Monoxide (CO) .......................................................................................... 19
2.3.5 Ammonia (NH3) ..................................................................................................... 20
2.4 Short-Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCPs) ........................................................................ 21
2.4.1 Black Carbon ........................................................................................................... 21
2.4.2 Methane ................................................................................................................... 23
2.4.3 Non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) ........................................... 24
2.5 Green House Gases (GHGs) ........................................................................................... 26
2.5.1 Carbon Dioxide (CO2) ............................................................................................. 26
2.6 Emission Source Sectors ................................................................................................. 28
2.6.1 Transportation ......................................................................................................... 28
2.6.2 Electricity Generation ............................................................................................. 29
2.6.3 Industry.................................................................................................................... 31
2.6.4 Residential ............................................................................................................... 33
2.6.5 Other Contributing Sector ....................................................................................... 36
Clean Air Plan of Cambodia iii
3. MEASURES TO REDUCE EMISSIONS ............................................................................. 42
3.1 The Government Circular on Measures to Prevent and Reduce the Ambient Air Pollution ..... 42
3.2 Sub Decree on Control of Air Pollution and Noise Disturbance .................................... 46
3.3 Cambodia Climate Change Strategic Plan (CCCSP) 2014-2023.................................... 46
3.4 Cambodia’s Updated Nationally Determined Contribution............................................ 48
3.5 Emission Reduction from Priority Air Pollution Measures ............................................ 49
3.6 Expected changes in air pollution concentration and impacts ........................................ 52
3.7 Air Pollution Human Health Benefits ............................................................................. 53
4. ACTION PLAN TO REDUCE AIR POLLUTION .............................................................. 60
4.1 Emission Control from Transportation ........................................................................... 60
4.2 Emission Control from Industries and Handicrafts......................................................... 63
4.3 Emission Control from Electricity Generation ............................................................... 65
4.4 Emission Control from Residential Sector...................................................................... 67
4.5 Emission Control from other sources .............................................................................. 69
4.5.1 Emission Control from Construction Sites.............................................................. 71
4.5.2 Emission Control from Open Waste Burning ......................................................... 73
5. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING THE MEASURES ........................................ 76
5.1 Characterizing the nature of the air pollution problem ................................................... 76
5.2 Developing an emission inventory .................................................................................. 76
5.3 Identifying the air quality goal and timeframe for achievement ..................................... 76
5.4 Conducting air quality modelling and identifying new emission reduction strategies in
order to achieve the air quality goal .......................................................................................... 76
5.5 Formulating and adopting the requirements ................................................................... 77
5.6 Implementing effective programs for permitting and enforcement ................................ 77
5.7 Monitor implementation of air pollution mitigation measures identified in this plan .... 77
5.8 Public participation ......................................................................................................... 77
5.9 Review and update Air Pollution Action Plan ................................................................ 77
Figure 2.1 Graph of average of PM2.5 in Phnom Penh City from 2017 to 2020 ......................... 11
Figure 2.2 Map of Air Quality Monitoring Station ....................................................................... 12
Figure 2.3 Summary of pollutants that are classified as air pollutants, short-lived climate
pollutants and greenhouse gases (Source: CCAC SNAP, 2019) .................................................. 14
Figure 2.4 Share of PM2.5 emissions by sector in 2015 ............................................................... 15
Figure 2.5 Total PM2.5 Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030 ..................................... 15
Figure 2.6 Share of Sulphur Dioxide emission by sector in 2015................................................. 16
Figure 2.7 Total Sulpur Dioxide (SO2) Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030 ............. 17
Figure 2.8 Share of Nitrogen Dioxide emission by sector in 2015 ............................................... 18
Figure 2.9 Total Nitrogen Dioxide Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030 ................... 18
Figure 2.10 Share of Carbon Monoxide emission by sector in 2015 ............................................ 19
Figure 2.11 Total Carbon Monoxide Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030 ................ 19
Figure 2.12 Share of Ammonia emission by sector in 2015 ......................................................... 20
Figure 2.13 Total Ammonia Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030 ............................. 21
Figure 2.14 Share of Black Carbon emission by sector in 2015 ................................................... 22
Figure 2.15 Total Black Carbon Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030 ....................... 22
Figure 2.16 Share of Methane emission by sector in 2015 ........................................................... 23
Figure 2.17 Total Methane Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030 ............................... 24
Figure 2.18 Share of NMVOCs emission by sector in 2015 ......................................................... 25
Figure 2.19 Total NMVOC Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030............................... 26
Figure 2.20 Share of Carbon Dioxide emission by sector in 2015 ............................................... 27
Figure 2.21 Total Carbon Dioxide Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030 .................... 27
Figure 2.22 Contribution of transport sectors to total transport emissions in Cambodia in 2010 ............. 28
Figure 2.23 Progression of PM2.5 emissions from the transport sector between 2010 and 2030 ............ 29
Figure 2.24 Share of Carbon Dioxide emission by Fuel type in 2010 (%) ................................... 30
Figure 2.25 Progression of Carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation between 2010-2030...... 30
Figure 2.26 Contribution of Electricity generation sectors to total electricity generation emissions
in Cambodia in 2015 ..................................................................................................................... 31
Figure 2.27 Share of Carbon Dioxide emission by industry sector in 2010, (%) ......................... 32
Figure 2.28 Progression of Carbon dioxide emissions from industry sector between 2010-2030......... 33
Figure 2.29 Contribution of industry sectors to total industry emissions in Cambodia in 2015 ......... 33
Figure 2.30 Share of Carbon Monoxide emission by type of zone in 2015, (%) .......................... 34
Figure 2.31 Progression of carbon monoxide emissions from the residential between 2010-2030.... 35
Figure 2.32 Contribution of residential sectors to total residential emissions in Cambodia in 2015 .......... 36
Figure 2.33Progression of PM2.5 emission from construction sector between 2010-2030 ......... 39
Clean Air Plan of Cambodia v
Figure 3.1 Reduction of national PM2.5 emissions from measures.............................................. 50
Figure 3.2 Reduction of national black carbon emissions from measures .................................... 50
Figure 3.3 Reductions of national nitrogen oxide emissions from measures ............................... 51
Figure 3.4 Reduction of carbon dioxide from measures ............................................................... 51
Figure 3.5 Reduction of methane from measures ......................................................................... 52
Figure 3.6 Overview of LEAP-IBC calculation framework for air pollution health impact assessment... 54
Figure 3.7 Population-weighted PM2.5 concentrations for Cambodia from LEAP-IBC for 2010-
2030 for the baseline scenario ....................................................................................................... 57
Figure 3.8 Reduction in population-weighted PM2.5 concentrations for Cambodia from LEAP-
IBC for 2010-2030 ........................................................................................................................ 58
Figure 3.9 Premature deaths attributable to ambient PM2.5 exposure in Cambodia from LEAP-
IBC for 2010-2030 for the baseline scenario ................................................................................ 58
Figure 3.10 Premature deaths attributable to ambient PM2.5 exposure in Cambodia from LEAP-
IBC for 2010-2030 ........................................................................................................................ 59
Figure 4.1 PM2.5 reductions from transport measures ................................................................. 62
Figure 4.2 Carbon dioxide reductions from transport measures ................................................... 62
Figure 4.3 PM2.5 reductions from industry measures .................................................................. 64
Figure 4.4 CO2 reductions from industry measures ...................................................................... 64
Figure 4.5 CO2 reductions from electricity generation measures ................................................. 66
Figure 4.6 SO2 reductions from electricity generation measures .................................................. 67
Figure 4.7 PM2.5 reductions from residential measures ............................................................... 68
Figure 4.8 CO2 reductions from residential measures................................................................... 69
Figure 4.9 PM10 reductions from construction measures ............................................................. 73
Figure 4.10 PM2.5 reductions from open waste burning mitigation measures............................. 74
Figure 4.11 CO reduction from open waste burning mitigation measures ................................... 75
Table 1.1 The existing framework for air quality management in Cambodia ............................ 3
Table 1.2 WHO Air Quality Guideline (WHO, 2006) .................................................................... 6
Table 1.3 Pollutants exposure and health impact ............................................................................ 6
Table 2.1 Overview of air quality status in Cambodia .............................................................. 10
Table 2.2 Total emissions from 2010 to 2030 ............................................................................ 13
Table 2.3 National total emission of air pollutants, short-lived climate pollutants and
greenhouse gases in 2015 in the Cambodia by sector (Thousand MT). .................................... 13
Table 2.4 Electricity Generation by Fuel Types (GWh) ............................................................... 29
Table 2.5 Total Energy Consumption in Industry Sector (ktons) ................................................. 32
Table 2.6 Energy Consumption for Residential Sector (ktons) .................................................... 34
Table 2.7 Total Firewood Supplied for Charcoal Making and Charcoal Produced (ktons) .......... 36
Table 2.8 Charcoal Making emission by pollutants types between 2010-2030 ............................ 36
Table 2.9 Energy Consumption for Agriculture............................................................................ 37
Table 2.10 Agriculture (use energy) emission by pollutants types between 2010-2030 .............. 37
Table 2.11 Subsidiaries and industry crop production in Cambodia 2010-2015, (tons) ............... 38
Table 2.12 Agriculture (Non energy) emission by pollutants types between 2010-2030 ............. 38
Table 2.13 Construction projects in Cambodia between 2009-2019 ............................................ 39
Table 2.14 Waste Generation and Estimated Uncollected Waste in Cambodia, (Tonnes/Year) .. 40
Table 2.15 Waste sector emission by pollutants types between 2010-2030 ................................. 41
Table 3.1 Matrix of mitigation measures from Circular #01 in use for Development of Clean Air Plan ..... 43
Table 3.2 Matrix of mitigation measures from the sub decree in use for Development of Clean Air Plan ...... 46
Table 3.3 Matrix of mitigation measures from CCCSP in use for Development of Clean Air Plan ..... 47
Table 3.4 Matrix of recommended mitigation measures in use for Development of Clean Air Plan ....... 47
Table 3.5 Matrix of mitigation measures from NDC in use for Development of Clean Air Plan .................. 48
Table 3.6 Summary of baseline and nationally avoided emission ................................................ 49
Table 4.1 Mitigation measures apply for transportation sector ..................................................... 60
Table 4.2 Emission reductions for transport mitigation measures by pollutant ............................ 61
Table 4.3 Mitigation measures apply for industry sector .............................................................. 63
Table 4.4 Emission reductions for industry mitigation measures by pollutant ............................. 63
Table 4.5 Mitigation measures apply for electricity generation .................................................... 65
Table 4.6 Emission reductions for electricity generation by pollutant ......................................... 66
Table 4.7 Mitigation measures apply for residential sector .......................................................... 67
Table 4.8 Emission reductions for residential mitigation measures by pollutant ......................... 68
Table 4.9 Mitigation measures apply for construction sector ....................................................... 72
Table 4.10 Emission reductions for construction mitigation measures by pollutant .................... 72
Clean Air Plan of Cambodia vii
Table 4.11 Mitigation measures apply for open waste burning .................................................... 73
Table 4.12 Emission reductions for open waste burning mitigation measures by pollutant ................ 74
Table 5.1 Air Pollution Action Plan Roadmap: Activities, Organizations and time line ............. 78
The development of the Clean Air Plan of Cambodia is the first time that the emissions of
key health-damaging air pollutants have been quantified nationally, and the reduction in air
pollution from the implementation of mitigation measures that aim to improve air quality for the
sake of environmental and public health protection have been quantified. In the document, the
detail of pollutants is described based on their emission levels in Cambodia not only for historical
years, but also their expected pathway trend in the future while the mitigation measures are
exanimated.
The relevant data from the transport sector, agriculture, construction, energy consumption,
waste and other related emission sources sectors are collected and with the assistance from the
LEAP-IBC application, the current emission state of all major air pollutants such as nitrogen
oxides, fine particulate matter, short-lived climate pollutants (black carbon and methane) and
greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide) are quantified, as is their likely progression in the future.
In general, the largest sources of air pollutants and short-lived climate pollutants in
Cambodia are transport, electricity generation, industrial process and residential sectors. Tracking
to the source of specifically main air pollutants, it shows that residential sector is the largest source
of PM2.5 and black carbon, following by charcoal making and transport. While the transport sector
is highly contributed to emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide,
the electricity generation is the second contributor of CO2 following by industrial process sector.
The main source of SO2 is from electricity generation and Industry. The project of total emission
illustrates that in 2030, PM2.5 will reach 98.5 Thousand MT, 14.6 Thousand MT (Black carbon),
70 Thousand MT (SO2), 329 Thousand MT (NOx) and 40,150.8 Thousand MT (CO2).
The several air pollutants and SLCPs have common sources, therefore designing mitigation
strategies has the potential to lead to the simultaneous reduction of multiple pollutants, and also
greenhouse gases like methane and carbon dioxide. The potential emissions reduction is examined
with the implementation of key existing government regulations, policies and strategies related to
emission reduction. To implement air pollution measures according to the circular no.01on
“Measures to Prevent and Reduce the Ambient Air Pollution, the air pollutant emission can reduce
dramatically. Especially, for PM2.5, PM10 and CO, where the implementation of the mitigation
measures in the circular could cut emissions of these pollutants by halve in 2030 compared to a
baseline scenario. For all measures combined, air pollutant emission is cut significantly over the
next 9 years compared to a baseline scenario, with a reduction in emissions in 2030 of 59.8
Thousand MT (60.71%) for PM2.5, 73 Thousand MT (55.1%) for PM10, 9.3 Thousand MT
(63.69%) for Black Carbon, 36.5 Thousand MT (52.14%) for SO2, 158 Thousand MT (48.02%)
for NO2 and 7,461.7 Thousand MT (18.58%) for CO2.
The Kingdom of Cambodia is located in the southwest of the Indochinese peninsular and
has a rich culture that dates back 2,000 years ago. The country has a land area of 181,035
square kilometers and population of 16 million people (2017). Like in the rest of Southeast
Asia, Cambodia’s climate is characterized by two main seasons: the monsoon, which brings
rain from mid-May to October, and dry season from November to April. Cambodia is
recognized as a country with rich natural and cultural resources. Environment and natural
resources are the foundation of economic, social, cultural and well-being of the Cambodian people.
Economically, Cambodia has enjoyed strong growth rates during the past decade.
Economic performance had positive statistics with an average Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
growth of 6.98% between 2010-2015, and 7.1% from 2015-2019 (Cambodia Economic
Update, World Bank (WB). 2019). GDP per capita is US$1,641 in 2019 (WB, 2019) compared
to approximately US$1,215 in 2016 (MEF, 2016). With its rapidly growing economy,
Cambodia is not immune to rapidly rising air pollution levels. Urban Cambodians, in
particular, have observed a deterioration in the quality of the air they breathe and rural
Cambodians are not immune to breathing high levels of air pollutions, especially the 80% of
rural population who continue to rely on wood for cooking. Increasing industrial processes; a
growing fuel-intensive vehicle fleet; wildfires, open field burning of solid waste, and
construction sites, are seen as the main contributors to this decline in air quality.
Cambodia has an opportunity to curb the trend of rising air pollution. To do this,
significant effort in monitoring, enforcement of Cambodia’s ambitious and innovative new air
quality regulation is needed. Additional priority mitigation measures could also be identified
to complement existing air quality regulations and help achieve national ambient air quality
standards. Within the effort to reduce air pollution in Cambodia, the nation received financial
and technical support from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)’s Asia
Pacific Clean Air Partnership (APCAP) and the Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC) to
develop an important strategic document tilted “Clean Air Plan of Cambodia”. This important
Air pollution causes a series of significant adverse impacts to public health, environment,
and the economic development. Although effects are experienced locally, air pollution is also
a transboundary problem: while most air pollutants, for example oxides of nitrogen, directly
impact air quality proximate to their emission source, other pollutants such as Sulphur dioxide
can also travel long distances to affect air quality hundreds or even thousands of kilometers
away.
Since 2000, the Government of Cambodia began to address air and noise pollution at the
national level with the Sub-decree No. 42 on Air Pollution Control and Noise Disturbance.
The Sub-decree outlines the general purpose which is to “protect the quality of the environment
and public health from air pollution… through monitoring, curbing and mitigation activities.”
Table 1.1 provides an overview of the existing framework for air quality management in
Cambodia.
The Department of Air Quality and Noise Management (DAQNM) under the supervision
of the General Directorate of Environmental Protection of the Ministry of Environment of
Cambodia is the main government agency assigned in monitoring and controlling air pollution
from all sources (area, stationary, and mobile sources). The DAQNM’s mandate is to develop
policies, strategies, regulations, and action plans to prevent air pollution and improve the air
quality for public health and environment protection. Moreover, DAQNM has duties to control
emissions from stationary sources, such as factories, to ensure the emissions from pollution
sources are in compliance with the national emission standard. Part of the responsibilities of
the DAQNM is to study, research, evaluate, and disseminate new and emerging technology on
monitoring, prevention, and control of air pollutant emissions, noise, or vibration from mobile
and stationary sources and to act as the focal institution/partner to implement the
international/regional conventions, protocols and agreements related to air pollution.
Air pollution has no boundary and the exposure to air pollutants, both short- and long-term
exposure, can affect human health. Particulate matter (PM) containing a complex mixture of
organic and inorganic particles suspended in the air which the major components are sulphates,
nitrates, ammonia, black carbon etc. Particles with the diameter of 2.5 μm or less are the most
health-damaging as it can penetrate and lodge deep inside the lungs. There are some diseases
associated with long-term exposure to PM such as adverse birth outcomes, childhood respiratory
disease, diabetes, atherosclerosis, and neurodevelopment and cognitive function. It is reported by
World Health Organization (WHO) that about 91% of people globally breathe air that exceed the
WHO Air Quality Guidelines (Table 1.2) and that ambient air pollution has killed about 4.2 million
people annually worldwide where Western Pacific and South East Asia are the most affected
(WHO, 2016).
Clean Air Plan of Cambodia 5
Table 1.2 WHO Air Quality Guideline (WHO, 2006)
Differences variety of air pollution sources associated with different types of health effects. There
are several studies including Toxicological, Epidemiological, Clinical, Toxicological studies
regarding to on health impact due to air pollutants has been conducted and there were evidences
on effect of pollutants and diseases associated.
Table 1.3 Pollutants exposure and health impact
The emissions of pollutants to the atmosphere can cause a variety of adverse impacts
including human health, climate, and environmental impacts. Air pollution reduction has been
identified as a global health priority which has been reflected in the sustainable development goal
(SDG) as following: urban sustainable development as SDG 11 indicates air pollution levels in
cities, sustainable energy as SDG 7 indicates the access to clean energy), health as SDG 3 indicates
reduction of mortality due to air pollution (WHO, 2016). Thus, mitigation for emission reduction
is significant and in general, the implementation of these mitigation measures can also contribute
to sustainable development benefits.
The purpose of the Clean Air Plan of Cambodia is to outline a set of priority policies and
measures to reduce the key sources of air pollution in the country and lead to improvement of
air quality levels for public health protection. It also identifies the effectiveness of the planned
The priority mitigation measures identified in this plan are aligned and complementary
to the Air Pollution Circular mitigation measures. In addition, the Clean Air Plan proposes
additional measures relevant for the Cambodia based on the recommended 25 clean air
measures from the UNEP and CCAC 2018 Report “Air Pollution in Asia Pacific: Science -
Based Solutions.”
The overall objectives of the Plan and the planning process are:
An integrated emissions and scenario analysis for air pollutants, greenhouse gases and
short-lived climate pollutants estimates the current and future national trends in air quality.
Followed by the air pollution, GHG and SLCP emission reductions could result from the full
implementation of the identified air pollution mitigation measures. Finally, specific actions to
increase implementation of these air pollution mitigation measures are identi fied, as well as
actions to improve air quality management in general in Cambodia.
The Plan was developed by a technical working group established in December 2020 on
a decision of the Ministry of Environment in charge of developing and executing the mitigation
measures. The technical working group comprises of representatives from inter-ministerial
agencies, academic institutes, and other relevant sectors. The members of the technical
working group coming from relevant line ministries and research academia such as Minis try
of Environment, Ministry of Industry Science Technology and Innovation, Ministry Mine and
Energy, Ministry of Public Work and Transportation, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and
Fishery, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Education Youth and Sports, Ministry of Foreign
Affairs and International Cooperation, Ministry of Water Resources and Meteorology,
Ministry of Information, Ministry of Labor and Vocational Training, Ministry of Health,
Ministry of Commerce, General Department of Customs and Excise, Council Development of
Cambodia, Royal University of Phnom Penh and Institute of Technology of Cambodia. The
terms of reference for the working group is provided as Annex 1.
1.7 Challenges identified during the formulation of the Clean Air Plan
The following challenges were identified during the development of this plan:
• Limited data on pollutant sources, emissions and levels of air quality to subsequently
identify measures to mitigate concentrations. Therefore, international default data in air
pollution emission factors were employed in the absence of certain local data.
• Lack of human resources and technical expertise within the government with regards to
air quality management.
• Difficulty in securing commitment from stakeholders in developing and implementing
new actions for the Plan. Even though air quality management is a crosscutting issue,
many stakeholders do not see the benefits of air quality in contributing towards their
development goals. (Formulation of new actions without support may also lead to an
absence of ownership by the lead stakeholders. This would hinder the Plan from being
adopted and implemented.)
Clean Air Plan of Cambodia 9
2. STATUS OF AIR QUALITY AND SOURCES OF EMISSIONS
This chapter describes the state of air quality in the country. It discusses the pollutants
in detail, including the magnitude of emissions of different pollutants in the Cambodia
currently, and their likely progression into the future. The major sources sectors of emissions
of each pollutant in the Cambodia such as residential, transport, waste, agriculture, and
electricity generation are also identified.
Air quality monitoring has been in place since 1999 and from 2017 air quality have been
further strengthen by installing the first equipment for PM2.5 monitor in Phnom Penh. Later,
in 2018, air quality monitoring were installed in Phnom Penh and other provinces. For
monitoring the current air quality, so far, the DAQNM has installed 44 units of low-cost air
quality monitoring equipment across the provinces of Cambodia. The equipment mainly
monitors key parameters including PM2.5, PM10, CO, NO2, SO2 and O3. The data from the
air quality monitoring equipment have been recorded and daily posted in MOE Facebook
page and LED Screen in front of the MOE building in Phnom Penh. Air Quality Index (AQI)
is developed to better communicate with the public. AQI results for stations throughout the
country have been published daily through the social media page of the Ministry of
Environment. For better management of air pollution sources, MoE was provided with the
first mobile air quality monitoring vehicle with which 16 parameters and positive inert
particles with the diameter of 1 micrometer can be detected. This mobile air quality monitor
was inaugurated in 2020.
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2017 (Average =13.59 µg/m3) 2018 (Average =19.26 µg/m3)
2019 (Average =21.12 µg/m3) 2020 (Average =19.69 µg/m3)
Figure 2.1 Graph of average of PM2.5 in Phnom Penh City from 2017 to 2020
Reporting of AQ information
The data from the air quality monitoring equipment have been recorded and daily posted in
MOE Facebook page and LED Screen in front of the MOE building. Air Quality Index (AQI)
is developed to better communicate with the public. AQI results for stations throughout the
country have been published daily through the social media page of the Ministry of
Environment.
The levels of air pollution in the atmosphere are determined by i) the emissions of air
pollutants from different sources in Cambodia, ii) weather patterns that disperse and transport
air pollutants from one location to another, and iii) emissions of air pollutants in other countries
that are transported to Cambodia. This Clean Air Action Plan of Cambodia focuses on
assessing the emissions of air pollutants that occur within Cambodia, as it is those sources
within the country that it is possible to take action and implement mitigation measures to
reduce the magnitude of air pollutant emissions, and improve air quality for Cambodians.
National total emissions were estimated from all major energy and non-energy sectors
for the Cambodia for all major air pollutants (nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds,
ammonia, fine particulate matter (PM2.5), organic carbon and carbon monoxide), short-lived
climate pollutants (black carbon and methane), and greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide). More
information on these individual air pollutants is included in Section 2.3. Table 2.2 displays
how the national emissions of these pollutants were projected to progress over the years from
2010 until 2030 under a baseline scenario taking into account future projections of population
and economic growth in Cambodia. Table 2.3 shows, for the base year 2010, the pollutant
emissions split by major source sectors.
Volatile Organic
Organic Carbon
Carbon Dioxide
Nitrogen-Oxide
Sulfur-Dioxide
Black Carbon
Non-Methane
Compounds
Monoxide
Ammonia
Methane
Carbon
PM2.5
PM10
2010 28.69 7.21 61.44 74.03 138.08 63.71 83.57 346.38 347.36 978.49 9,161.76
2015 31.85 8.46 68.14 83.85 124.91 32.93 127.03 462.16 304.39 1,234.18 13,608.09
2020 34.04 9.35 72.88 92.50 114.04 40.97 158.00 578.95 260.26 1,492.55 18,444.60
2025 38.58 11.37 83.33 107.85 109.95 52.18 221.38 778.54 234.10 1,952.94 26,438.60
2030 44.97 14.57 98.50 132.42 112.00 70.05 328.96 1,119.21 218.22 2,725.61 40,150.82
Table 2.3 National total emission of air pollutants, short-lived climate pollutants and
greenhouse gases in 2015 in the Cambodia by sector (Thousand MT).
Carbon Monoxide
Volatile Organic
Organic Carbon
Carbon Dioxide
Nitrogen-Oxide
Sulfur-Dioxide
Black Carbon
Non-Methane
Compounds
Ammonia
Branches
Methane
PM2.5
PM10
Residential 12.726 3.842 29.325 36.539 3.972 3.631 9.917 117.983 22.163 371.972 14.891
Commercial and Public Services 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.005 0.001 0.297 0.113 0.020 0.005 0.039 59.439
Industry 0.975 0.567 1.980 2.024 0.004 2.658 3.652 4.084 0.411 8.259 402.524
Agriculture 0.045 0.064 0.153 0.153 0.000 0.037 1.499 0.080 0.005 0.207 117.892
Energy Industry Own Use 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.000 0.015 0.044 0.001 0.002 0.011 49.450
Transport 2.295 1.868 6.151 6.151 0.188 2.398 90.485 189.469 2.084 437.511 8233.438
Electricity Generation 0.010 0.008 0.192 0.397 0.009 20.756 10.200 0.063 0.050 0.394 4043.851
Charcoal Making 4.151 0.611 8.366 8.366 1.191 1.852 0.579 105.544 43.119 311.483 -
Industrial Process Emissions - 0.001 0.218 0.370 - 0.153 0.077 0.153 - 0.421 686.601
Agriculture (Non-Energy) 1.742 0.264 2.886 3.044 117.434 0.190 1.249 2.296 229.671 32.478 -
Waste 9.904 1.229 18.423 22.361 2.106 0.941 9.215 42.467 6.879 71.401
In general, the largest sources of air pollutants and short-lived climate pollutants in the
Cambodia are the transport, industry, residential and waste sectors, and electricity generation,
industrial process emissions and charcoal making also contribute the pollution for some
specific pollutants e.g. PM2.5, SO2, NOx, and greenhouse gases like CO 2. This shows that
several air pollutants and SLCPs have common sources, therefore designing mitigation
strategies has the potential to lead to the simultaneous reduction of multiple pollutants, and
also greenhouse gases like methane and carbon dioxide. Between now and 2030, emissions of
key pollutants are expected to increase substantially if policy measures to reduce emissions
are not implemented (under baseline scenario), due to the growth of population and the Gross
Domestic Product (GDP).
Clean Air Plan of Cambodia 13
The following sections describe in detail the major sources, and future projections of
each air pollutant and SLCPs.
Figure 2.3 Summary of pollutants that are classified as air pollutants, short-lived climate
pollutants and greenhouse gases (Source: CCAC SNAP, 2019)
The classification of particles in air by size and composition are known as particulate matter
or PM. It is not a single pollutant, but made of multiple components and is produced from
emissions from multiple emission sources. The different sizes of aerosols are:
The PM size affects its lifetime in the atmosphere, distribution, and indoor-outdoor ratio.
PM2.5 is extremely harmful to human health at high levels of short-term exposure and from
prolonged exposure even to low concentrations.
In 2015, the total emission of PM2.5 in Cambodia was about 68.14 Thousand MT. The
Residential sector dominated the share of about 43.03% and followed by 27.04% from Waste,
12.28% from Charcoal Making, 9.03% from transport, 2.91% from industry, and other sources
merged only about 5.72%), Figure 2.4. The main reason that causes the PM2.5 have a highest share
because number of people living in rural area (about 80%) use wood as fuel for cooking stove.
Emissions from charcoal making comes from open waste burning.
12.28%
Industry
Charcoal Making
9.03%
Transport
43.03% Waste
Residential
27.04%
Other
80 Transport
70 Charcoal Making
PM2.5 Emission
60 Industry
50 Agriculture (Non
Energy)
40 Construction
Industrial Process
30
Emissions
Electricity Generation
20
Agriculture
10
Commercial and
0 Public Services
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Energy Industry Own
Use
Figure 2.5 Total PM2.5 Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030
In 2030, the largest emission source of direct PM2.5 emissions is still projected to come
from the residential sector (wood burning mostly from rural areas) with the total emission of 98.5
SO2 is a colorless gas that easy to dissolve in water droplet to form sulfuric acid and later
developed to be acid rain. It has been known as a potential pollutant which can damage building,
reduce crop production, and harmful to human health as well as the natural ecosystem. SO2 is
primarily produced when burning fossil fuel in power plants, charcoal transformation, combustion
in vehicle engine and other source sector which activities consumed fuel oils.
The figure 2.6 is show that electricity generation is main SO2 emissions contributor
responsible for about 64.88% in 2015, and residential (11.35%), industry (8.31%), transport
(7.50%), charcoal making (5.79%), and the remaining 2.17% were from combined sources (waste,
Commercial and Public Services, Agriculture (Non-Energy), Industrial Process Emissions,
Agriculture, and Energy Industry Own Use).
The total emission of SO2 from 2010-2030, Figure 2.7, were declined due to the reduction
of fuel-based electricity generation in relation to the increase of coal thermal power plant. As of
2010, the total emission was about 63.71 Thousand MT and dropped to about 32.93 Thousand MT
in 2015, the estimated decrease rate was about 8.2% per year. SO2 emission in 2015 from
electricity generation reduced by two times from 62.85 Thousand MT in 2010 to about 32
Thousand MT in 2015, it is caused by the changing fuel consumption in electricity generation from
heavy fuel oil to sub bituminous coal. Similar trend was observed in the industry sector.
Nevertheless, an increasing trend start from 2015 to 2030 of SO2 emissions were applied to
70 Industry
Residential
60
Emission of SO2
Charcoal Making
50
Transport
Industrial Process
20 Emissions
Agriculture
10 Waste
Figure 2.7 Total Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030
Oxides of Nitrogen are released from vehicle emissions, burning of biomass and forests.
High levels of nitrogen oxides contribute to the formation of acid rain, which in turn damages
vegetation, buildings and pollute water bodies. Nitrogen oxides at high concentrations are also
harmful lung irritants and can cause respiratory diseases including bronchitis and wheezing. They
also react with volatile organic compounds to form tropospheric ozone, which is toxic to human health.
Nitrogen oxides are also a key precursor to the formation of secondary particulate matter in the
atmosphere, contributing to the levels of PM2.5 that people are exposed to and that cause negative
health impacts.
In Cambodia, transport was the major source of NOx emissions which contribute about
71.23% and electricity generation (8.03%), residential (7.81%), waste (7.25%), industry (2.87%),
agriculture (1.18%) and other merge source (1.62%) were the remaining (Agriculture (Non-
Energy), Charcoal Making, Commercial and Public Services, Industrial Process Emissions,
Energy Industry Own Use), Figure 2.8.
Electricity Generation
300
Industry
250
Emission of NOx
Waste
200 Residential
Agriculture
150
Agriculture (Non Energy)
Industrial Process
50 Emissions
Commercial and Public
Services
0 Energy Industry Own Use
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Figure 2.9 Total Nitrogen Dioxide Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030
Figure 2.9 above displays the trend of NOx emissions by source sector between 2010 and
2030 under the baseline scenario, which the total NOx reaches 329 Thousand TM in 2030. The
highest emissions of NOx was observed from the transport sector, with a significant projected
increase because of the emission from the freight (land) and Passenger (land) in transport sector
accounted for 75.65% and 24.35%, respectively. Electricity generation is also a large source of
NOx that is projected to increase in the future. Residential and industry sector are also the major
source of NOx that increase in following year.
CO is an odorless and colorless gas, the product of incomplete combustion of fossil fuels
and other biomass. In Cambodia, transport sector was the main CO emissions contributor
responsible for about 35.45% and residential almost 30.14%, charcoal making (25.24%), waste
(579%), and the remaining 3.39% were from combined sources (agriculture, industry, electricity
generation, industrial process emissions, commercial and public services and energy industry own
use), Figure 2.10.
3.39% 5.79%
Waste
25.24% Charcoal Making
35.45%
Residential
Transport
Other
30.14%
Residential
Carbon Monoxides Emission
2500
Charcoal Making
2000 Waste
Industrial Process
1000 Emissions
Electricity Generation
500 Agriculture
Figure 2.11 Total Carbon Monoxide Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030
NH3 is commonly known occurred naturally in the environment including soil, air, and the
plant also animal and the human body. Exposure to a high concentration of NH3 can pose negative
impacts on human health which influence the cardiovascular and respiratory system. NH3 released
to atmospheric environment can bind with other gaseous pollutants which are later detrimental to
the natural environment.
The total emission of NH3 in 2015 was about 124.90 Thousand MT with largely contributed
by Agriculture in non-energy sector about 94.02% (117.43 Thousand MT), follow by 3.18%
(almost 4.00 Thousand MT) in residential sector and 2.80% (3.50 Thousand MT) combine sector
that have shown in Figure 2.12.
2.80% 3.18%
Other
Residential
Agriculture (Non Energy)
94.02%
Figure 2.13 below is presented about the total annual emission from 2010-2030. The
overall trend was downtrend as higher emission of NH3 happened in 2015 (about 138.8 Thousand
MT) as compared to the 2030 emission of about 112 Thousand MT. The major influential factor
was mainly from the livestock sector where the decrease the population of livestock feeding at
both household and farming.
Waste
100
Emission Ammonia
Charcoal Making
80
Transport
60 Electricity Generation
40 Industry
Figure 2.13 Total Ammonia Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030
Black carbon or soot, is a component of particulate matter (PM) and, therefore, behaves
much differently than GHGs. It does not mix well in the atmosphere; therefore, its particles remain
suspended in the air until they settle back on the surface, or become washed out by rain, or
contribute to cloud formation. The average atmospheric lifetime of a single soot particle is only a
few days. As a dark mass, black carbon particles absorb abundant amounts of energy, trapping
heat and warming the climate. Like methane, for the equivalent mass emission, black carbon
warms the climate more intensely than CO2 over a short time frame, and to greater extremes.
Despite lasting in the atmosphere for a few days, one ton of black carbon has a warming effect
equal to 1,000 -2,000 tons of CO2 over a 100 –year period.
Figure 2.14 shows that residential sector was the main black carbon contributor shared
about 53.10% and followed by transport (25.82%), waste (16.98%), charcoal making (8.44%),
industry (7.84%), agriculture in non-energy sector (3.65%) and the remaining 1.06% were from
combined sources (agriculture, electricity generation, commercial and public services, and
industrial process emissions).
8.44%
Agriculture (Non Energy)
25.82% Charcoal Making
16.98% Waste
Industry
7.84%
Residential
Transport
53.10% Other
Residential
Black Carbon Emission
Industry
10 Waste
Charcoal Making
Agriculture (Non
Energy)
5 Agriculture
Electricity Generation
Figure 2.15 Total Black Carbon Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030
Black carbon emissions are the result of incomplete combustion of biomass or fossil fuels.
Major sources of black carbon include biomass cooking stoves, diesel and two-stroke engines, and
open-air-burning of waste. Figure 2.15 displays the trend in emissions of black carbon by their
source sectors between 2010 and 2030 under the baseline scenario. Black carbon mission increased
annually with an average rate of 2.7% with the total emission reaching 14.6 Thousand TM in 2030.
2.4.2 Methane
Methane (CH4) is a colorless, odorless, and highly flammable gas composed of one carbon
atom and four hydrogen atoms. It can be produced naturally and synthetically, and when burned
in the presence of oxygen, it produces carbon dioxide and water vapor. The gas is also known as
a significant contributor to climate change.
CH4 has an atmospheric lifetime of 12 years, but it has significant warming potential
during that time. The Global Warming Potential or GWP of one ton of methane is equivalent to
21 tons of CO2 over 100 years and equivalent to 75 tons of CO2 over 20 years. GWPs allow
comparisons of the warming impacts of different gases by measuring how much energy 1 ton of
any given gas absorbs over a period of time, compared to 1 ton of carbon dioxide. Besides having
a high warming impact of its own, methane also serves as a major contributor to the production of
tropospheric ozone, (which is also a short-lived climate pollutant, and warms the atmosphere).
7.28%
Waste
14.17%
Residential
Charcoal Making
Agriculture (Non Energy)
75.45% Other
Figure 2.16 above shows the largest contributor to methane emissions is the agriculture in
non-energy sector. The total annual CH4 emission in 2015 was 304.39 Thousand MT and livestock
source was dominated with a share of about 75.45% follow by charcoal making is 14.17%,
residential is 7.28%, waste is 2.26% and the remaining sources contributed about 0.86 collectively.
For the emission from livestock, cows accounted for the largest emissions of about 80% among
other species.
Residential
250
Methane Emission
Waste
200
Transport
150 Industry
Figure 2.17 Total Methane Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030
The total annual CH4 emission from 2010-2030 in agriculture (Non-Energy) shows an
inconsistency pattern in emissions as downtrend as a highest emission of methane in happen in
2010 (about 347.36Thousand MT) as compare to 2030 emission about 218.2 Thousand MT
(Figure 2.17), these could be explained by the decrease of domestic feeding at both households
and farming. The emission of methane were remain steady from 2010-2030 in charcoal making
and residential sector.
Apart from affecting global warming, tropospheric ozone affects impacts evaporation rates,
cloud formation, precipitation levels, and wind patterns. It also impairs the ability of plants to
absorb carbon, thereby suppressing crop yields and subsequently harming ecosystems. These
impacts mainly occur within the regions where tropospheric ozone precursors are emitted.
Unlike the other GHGs, tropospheric or ground level ozone (a primary component of smog)
is not directly emitted. Instead, it is the product of the atmospheric reaction of a number of
precursor pollutants, including methane, nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), and carbon monoxide (CO). Tropospheric ozone has an atmospheric lifetime of
approximately 3 weeks. The major emission sources of ozone precursors methane and NOx were
discussed in earlier sections. Figure 2.16 shows that for VOCs, which also contribute to ozone
formation, the major source is the transport sector.
1.45%
9.19%
Waste
22.84% Charcoal Making
41.00%
Residential
Transport
Other
25.53%
Between 2010-2030, Figure 2.19, the NMVOCs leveled up from 346.37 Thousand MT to
1119.21 Thousand MT in 2030 with an estimated average growth rate of 3.45% per year.
Residential and Charcoal making sources show an increasing trend that aligned with the population
growth and the demand for solid fuels for daily cooking. Moreover, transport sector also increases
dramatically from 85.85 Thousand MT in 2010 to 805.42 Thousand MT in 2030 with an estimate
average growth rate of 41.91% per annual. It is because of the passenger car increase from 2010-
2030 that is further described in transport section (Section 2.6.1).
Residential
1000
Charcoal Making
Emission of NMVOC
800 Waste
Industry
600
Agriculture (NonEnergy)
Industrial Process
400 Emissions
Electricity Generation
200 Agriculture
Figure 2.19 Total NMVOC Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030
GHGs, which trap heat in the atmosphere, are the principal cause of climate change. Carbon
dioxide (CO2) makes up for an estimated 76 percent of anthropogenic GHG emissions globally,
followed by methane and nitrous oxide. Methane emissions in the Cambodia are described above
as it is also a short-lived climate pollutant. CO2 has a much longer lifetime than Methane, and
remains in the atmosphere for around a hundred years.
In Cambodia, the analysis has shown that the major sources of greenhouse gases are also
major sources of air pollutants. Transport is the major source of CO2, and is simultaneously a
major source of NOx. Electricity generation and Waste is the major source of SOx and methane,
and is also a major source of many other air pollutants. Therefore, there is a large potential for
developing integrated strategies to simultaneously improve air quality and reduce the Cambodia’s
very small contribution to global warming. Like air pollutants and SLCPs, emissions of GHGs are
also projected to grow substantially in the future due to increase in population, and demand for
energy.
Industry
Industrial Process Emissions
29.72% Electricity Generation
60.50% Transport
Other
Figure 2.20 shows that the largest CO2 emission come from the transport of 60.50%. The
second largest emission of CO2 was electricity generation of 29.72%, followed by industrial
process emission and industry was 5.05% and 2.96%. For the emission from 2010-2030 in figure
2.21 below shows that increasing bar from 9161.76 Thousand MT to 40150,86 Thousand MT with annual
increase rate 3.86%.
Generation
0 Energy Industry
Own Use
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Figure 2.21 Total Carbon Dioxide Emission in Cambodia between 2010 and 2030
Having described the main pollutants considered in this plan in Sections 2.2-2.4 above, the
major source sectors identified, specifically transport, electricity generation, industry, residential,
charcoal making and other contribute sector, are now considered in more detail in turn in the sub-
sections below.
2.6.1 Transportation
Transport is one of the major sources of atmospheric pollutions. The transport sector covers
on-road transport, waterway, railway, and aviation. However, railway and aviation were not
considered in this estimation due to lacking reliable data. Thus, only on-road transport and
waterways were considered. Following the growth in population and urbanization, there has been
a rapid increase in the number of vehicles imported into Cambodia. According to the annual report
of Ministry of Public Works and Transport, the total registered vehicles have increased more than
52.70% from 2010 to 2015. The total number of vehicles registered had increased from 398,502
in 2015 to 646,073 in 2019 by approximately 62% (MoPWnT, 2019).
PM10
Black Carbon
NMVOCs
Organic Carbon
Carbon monoxide
Carbon Dioxide
Ammonia
Nitogen Oxides
Sulfur Dioxide
Figure 2.22 Contribution of transport sectors to total transport emissions in the Cambodia in 2010
The figure 2.22 shows how the different transport sectors contribute to emissions of
different pollutants in the base year 2010. For instance, the highest share of direct PM2.5 emissions
were contributed from the road transport of freight (40%), followed by passenger of road transport
emissions (38%). Note that shipping also contribute about 21% share of PM2.5 by transport goods
or passengers. The reason of this significant increase was the increasing of the huge number of
vehicles in Cambodia with the annual increase rate of 12.43% in the last 5 years.
Clean Air Plan of Cambodia 28
Particulate Matter PM2.5 in Thousand MT: Baseline
25
20
PM2.5 Emission
15
10
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Passenger: Land Passenger: Shipping Freight: Land Freight: Shipping
Figure 2.23 Progression of PM2.5 emissions from the transport sector between 2010 and 2030
Two important variables (inputs) to estimate the emissions from the electricity generation
are process share and process efficiency. The National Energy Statistics for Cambodia offered the
historical data from 2010-2015 that could serve the purpose of having the process share (%), Table
2.4 estimated using the electricity production from a sum of different fuel types. The economic
development and population growth affect electricity consumption. The electricity generation
increased almost 5 times between 2010 and 2015 and above 2 times higher in 2015 as compared
to 2014 (of 2,981 GWh). The electricity generation (GWh) was converted to ktons of electricity
generation by each fuel type.
2.89 %
10.62 %
86.49 %
Figure 2.24 Share of Carbon Dioxide emission by Fuel type in 2010, (%)
Figure 2.24 above shows the carbon dioxide emission by percent of fuel type in 2010. The
largest share of carbon dioxide emission about 86.49% by heavy fuel oil. The second largest of
carbon dioxide emission share about 10.62% by sub bituminous coal and follow by diesel is about
2.89% in 2010.
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Sub Bituminous Coal Heavy Fuel Oil Diesel
Figure 2.25 Progression of Carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation between 2010-2030
Figure 2.25 above focuses on carbon dioxide emissions and the emission trend for the fuel
type in electricity generation between 2010 and 2030 under baseline scenario. Due to expected
increases in economic growth and population, emission of carbon dioxide from heavy fuel oil was
Figure 2.26 Contribution of Electricity generation sectors to total electricity generation emissions
in the Cambodia in 2015
The figure 2.26 shows how the different electricity generation sectors contribute to
emissions of different pollutants in the base year 2015. For example, the highest share of ammonia
was contributed from the heavy fuel oil (90%) and from other pollution were contributed by sub
bituminous coal about (70%-80%)
2.6.3 Industry
Several fuel types (coal, petroleum products, biomass, and electricity) were reported in the
MME & ERIA (2016) and is used for the industrial sector (such as Food, beverages, and tobacco,
Paper, pulp, and printing, Construction, Textile and Leather, Garment and other industry);
however, the detailed process disaggregation was not available. The coal consumption is an
increasing trend over time in which 13 ktons in 2015 as compared to 5 ktons in 2010 due to the
investment on the thermal coal power plant in Cambodia and expecting in a growing trend in the
future. In the same period, petroleum products are in declining trend i.e., a total of 192 ktons in
2010 dropped to 112 ktons in 2015. Both biomass and electricity consumption are steadily
increasing over the same period. The total energy consumption in the industry sector is summarized
in Table 2.5.
Figure 2.27 shows that the largest carbon dioxide emitter was from the Industrial Process
Emissions (51.92%), followed by about 48.08% from industry sector in 2010. For figure 2.28
shows about the overall trend of carbon dioxide emission from 2010 to 2030. It was downtrend as
higher emission in industry sector happened in 2010 (about 1322.43 Thousand MT) as compared
to the 2015 emission of about 1089.13 Thousand MT. The major changes was mainly from the
heavy fuel oil were replaced by sub bituminous coal similar case to the electricity generation as
well.
Industry
48.08 %
51.92 % Industrial Process Emissions
3500
Emission (kMT)
3000
2500
Industry
2000
Industrial Process
1500
Emissions
1000
500
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Figure 2.28 Progression of Carbon dioxide emissions from industry sector between 2010-2030
The figure 2.29 shows how the different industry sectors contribute to emissions of
different pollutants in the base year 2015. For instance, the highest share of all pollution emissions
was contributed from the industry (80%-90%) except the carbon dioxide the highest share is from
industrial Process Emissions about 63%.
Figure 2.29 Contribution of industry sectors to total industry emissions in Cambodia in 2015
2.6.4 Residential
Key activity data for energy consumption in the residential sector (in ktons) for lighting
and cooking purposes is presented in Table 2.6. These data were derived from the Cambodia
Clean Air Plan of Cambodia 33
National Energy Statistics 2016 for the period 2010-2015 (MME & CERIA, 2016). The data from
ERIA for the period of 2010 to 2015 was used to estimate emission from residential and
commercial sectors. Energy for cooking and lighting was split based on fuel types. The
consumption of the electricity as the lighting source at households was increased gradually from
75 ktons in 2010 to 131 ktons in 2015 while the no more kerosene being used since 2014. For
cooking, solid fuels (firewood and charcoal) remained shared the largest fuel mixed in Cambodia
and followed by LPG. Biogas statistics from 2010-2015 reported by the National Biodigester
Programme were included.
3.09 %
8.59 %
Phnom Penh
Other Urban
Rural
88.32 %
Figure 2.30 Share of Carbon Monoxide emission by type of zone in 2015, (%)
The total emission of carbon monoxide by residential sector in 2015 was about 371.97
Thousand MT, the main emitter were from rural area about 88.32%, other urban area was about
8.59%, and Phnom Penh city was about 3.09%, Figure 2.30.
300
Kerosene
250
LPG
200
Charcoal
150
Wood
100
50
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Figure 2.31 Progression of carbon monoxide emissions from the residential between 2010-2030
The total annual carbon monoxide emissions from 2010-2030 in residential sector are
presented in figure 2.31. It clearly shows the carbon monoxides emission in residential sector
mainly increase from 2010-2030 by wood in rural area. The second contribute of carbon
monoxides in residential sector from 2010-2030 by charcoal and the remaining of carbon
monoxides from residential was LPG and Kerosene. According to the graph its shows that from
2010-2020 the emissions is almost stay still; however, carbon monoxide starts to increase slightly
from 2020-2030.
The figure 2.32 shows how the different residential sectors contribute to emissions of
different pollutants in the base year 2015. For instance, the highest share of carbon dioxide was
contributing in Phnom Penh area (48.76%), follow by rural area (32%) and other urban area. For
other pollution such as organic carbon, black carbon, PM2.5, PM10, ammonia, Sulfur Dioxide,
Nitrogen Oxides, NMVOCs, and Methane, the highest share was contributing by rural area about
80% to 90% and the rest were Phnom Penh area and other urban area.
Figure 2.32 Contribution of residential sectors to total residential emissions in Cambodia in 2015
Table 2.7 shows the total amount of wood consumed for charcoal production and charcoal
produced for the period of 2010 to 2015. The data derived from ERIA was used to calculate
emissions from this sector. In Cambodia, charcoal making was assumed still processed in
traditional kilns and only firewood was used for transformation. Of each year estimation, the
process efficiency of this method is only 11.43%.
Table 2.7 Total Firewood Supplied for Charcoal Making and Charcoal Produced (ktons)
Year
No Pollutants
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
1 Black Carbon 0.60 0.61 0.60 0.64 0.68
2 Ammonia 1.18 1.19 1.17 1.25 1.32
3 Sulfur-Dioxide 1.83 1.85 1.82 1.94 2.05
4 Organic Carbon 4.10 4.15 4.09 4.35 4.59
5 PM2.5 8.26 8.37 8.23 8.77 9.25
6 PM10 8.26 8.37 8.23 8.77 9.25
7 Methane 42.58 43.12 42.43 45.19 47.66
8 Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds 104.22 105.54 103.86 110.61 116.67
9 Carbon Monoxide 307.59 311.48 306.51 326.44 344.32
As reported in the Cambodia National Energy Statistics (MME & ERIA, 2016), the most
dominant fuel used for the agricultural purpose is diesel oil (DO). Cambodia is an agricultural
country, the utilization of mechanical machinery for agricultural purposes is important. From the
statistics, 2010-2015 indicated the increasing trend from 2010-2014 and slightly declined in 2015
(38 ktoe as compared to 2014 (50 ktoe).
Table 2.9 below display the projection trend in pollutions emission from agriculture (Use
Energy) sector between 2010-2030 in baseline scenario. According to the table, carbon monoxides
is a dominant pollution in agriculture and it increase over the years.
Table 2.10 Agriculture (use energy) emission by pollutants types between 2010-2030
Year
No Pollutants
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
1 Organic Carbon 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06
2 Black Carbon 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08
3 PM2.5 0.13 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.19
4 PM10 0.13 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.19
5 Sulfur-Dioxide 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05
6 Nitrogen-Oxide 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10
8 Methane 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
9 Carbon Monoxide 0.17 0.21 0.22 0.24 0.26
10 Carbon Dioxide 99.28 117.89 123.30 134.33 146.81
b) Agriculture (Non-Energy)
For the Agriculture in non-energy sector, the annual agricultural subsidiaries and industrial
crop productions from 2010-2015 compiled by the MAFF is presented in Table 2.10. Default
values of the fraction burnt (25% of each crop production) built-in LEAP for non-energy were
adopted directly for all of crop categories/species except the fraction burnt for the rice straw
Table 2.11 Subsidiaries and industry crop production in Cambodia 2010-2015, (tons)
Table 2.12 Agriculture (Non energy) emission by pollutants types between 2010-2030
Year
No Pollutants
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
1 Organic Carbon 1.41 1.74 1.85 2.01 2.20
2 Black Carbon 0.21 0.26 0.28 0.31 0.33
3 PM2.5 2.33 2.89 3.06 3.33 3.64
4 PM10 2.46 3.04 3.23 3.51 3.84
5 Ammonia 130.94 117.43 106.46 101.77 103.19
6 Sulfur-Dioxide 0.15 0.19 0.20 0.22 0.24
7 Non Methane Volatile Organic Compounds 2.04 2.30 2.45 2.67 2.91
8 Methane 275.91 229.67 185.11 152.31 128.71
9 Carbon Monoxide 25.97 32.48 34.39 37.47 40.95
The total pollution emission in agriculture (non energy) from 2010-2030, Table 2.12, were
declined due to the reduction of dairy cattle (cow) have been decrease annually. As of 2010, the
total methane emission was about 275.91 Thousand MT and dropped to about 128.71 Thousand
MT according to the projection. For other pollution its almost stay still between 2010-2030.
c) Construction
Emissions from the construction sector are caused by activities involved in the construction
phase, which are usually short-lived or temporary. These activities include concrete batching plant,
production sites, the use of heavy equipment on the roads, lack of control over the transportation
Whole of Cambodia
Building type
Non-Residential Residential Industrial Commercial
Year (m2) (m2) (m2) (m2)
2000
1500
1000
500
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Non Residentail Commercial Industrial Residentail
Figure 2.33 Progression of PM2.5 emission from construction sector between 2010-2030
Clean Air Plan of Cambodia 39
Figure 2.33 above present about progression of PM2.5 emission from construction sector
between 2010-2030. The main sources of PM2.5 emission was from Residential and it increase
every year according to the projection of LEAP analysis.
d) Waste
For the waste sector, the sources of emissions are originating from the point of generation,
waste management process and final disposal. By following the 2006 IPCC guideline, the sources
of emissions are categorized into:
Table 2.14 Waste Generation and Estimated Uncollected Waste in Cambodia, (Tonnes/Year)
The waste generation and uncollected waste estimation were prepared using the number of
population and waste generation per capita. The solid waste generation per capita was estimated
at around 0.5 kg/day and roughly to be about 4 million tonnes as of 2015 and the uncollected
wastes were estimated at about 87% of the total waste generation. From the National Institute of
Statistics, the population in Cambodia are classified as Urban and suburban/rural area, the waste
generation and uncollected waste are presented in Table 2.14. The amount of uncollected solid
waste in suburban areas of Phnom Penh was calculated based on the percentage of collection
coverage (83.3%) in Phnom Penh city reported in (IGES & UNEP, 2018). The waste disposal at
the landfill for some provinces were reported in Sethy (2017) were used to justify the uncollected
wastes in those provinces while the rest assumed all wastes are burnt after subtracting the
incombustible compositions.
Table 2.15 below shows the trend in methane emission from waste sector between 2010-
2030 in baseline scenario. Without any mitigation measure, there is a steady increase in methane
emission estimated over the year especially from municipal waste burning in Cambodia. Figure
2.35 demonstrates the progression of the direct PM2.5 emission from uncontrolled waste burning
The potential emissions reduction with the implementation of key existing government
regulations, policies and strategies related to emission reduction were estimated using the LEAP-
IBC tool. It is important that potential air pollution reduction are quantified for the mitigation
measures in order to visualize the pollution scenario for developing effective actions. In particular,
the Circular #01on “Measures to Prevent and Reduce the Ambient Air Pollution”, the sub decree
no.42 on “Control Air Pollution and Noise Disturbance”, Climate Change Strategic Plan 2014-
2023 and Cambodia’s Updated Nationally Determined Contribution are the main existing
government regulations and policies on emission reduction that are examined in this report.
Moreover, additional essential clean air measures are also analyzed to visualize the potential
emission reduction as for policy recommendation.
3.1 The Government Circular on Measures to Prevent and Reduce the Ambient Air Pollution
The circular on “Measures to Prevent and Reduce the Ambient Air Pollution” was issued in
early 2020. The circular was developed to support the government goal on reducing air pollution
in Cambodia for reflecting the recent increase of the Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in
urban areas of the country which poses a risk to the health of population. In the circular contains
strategic measurements on reducing air pollution from the major sources and activities that led to
the increasing of the concentration of Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5) including the release
of emissions from industrial, the uses of diesel-powered vehicles and other combustion fuels,
wildfires, forest fires lawns, yard burning, garbage burning, open field burning of solid waste,
waste landfills and construction sites. To be specific, there are 7 strategic measures including in
this circular as following.
- The Administration of Construction Sites focuses on reinforcing the management of dust
or particulate matter into the air and other discharges from pollutant sources such as
construction sites, concrete production sites, transport of pebble sand, cement or other
construction materials by means to require prior tire cleaning from the production sites
- The Quality Management of High Sulfur Content on Fuel focuses on promoting the
implementation of sulfur standard level which contained in fuel for compliance with EURO
standard (EURO III, IV, V).
- The Administration of Air Pollutants from Vehicles focuses on promoting the
implementation of the emission standard on air pollutants from vehicles for compliance
with EURO standard (EURO III, IV, V). Strengthening the traffic management in the
capital, provinces, cities and towns through improving the efficiency of urban planning and
reducing congestion and implementing prioritized strategies, public transportation and
Table 3.1 Matrix of mitigation measures from Circular N. 01 in use for Development of Clean Air Plan
The government strategic document “Cambodia Climate Change Strategic Plan 2014-2023”
was issued in 2013. This document was developed with vision “Cambodia develops towards a
green, low-carbon, climate-resilient, equitable, sustainable and knowledge-based society”. The
strategy document determines 3 goals including:
- Reducing vulnerability to climate change impacts of people, in particular the most
vulnerable, and critical systems (natural and societal);
- Shifting towards a green development path by promoting low-carbon development and
technologies;
- Promoting public awareness and participation in climate change response actions.
The CCCSP 2014-2023 outlines 8 strategic objectives including:
- Promote climate resilience through improving food, water and energy security
- Reduce sectoral, regional, gender vulnerability and health risk to climate change impacts
Table 3.3 Matrix of mitigation measures from CCCSP in use for Development of Clean Air Plan
Table 3.4 Matrix of recommended mitigation measures in use for Development of Clean Air Plan
Table 3.5 Matrix of mitigation measures from NDC in use for Development of Clean Air Plan
Organic Compounds
Carbon Monoxide
Organic Carbon
Carbon Dioxide
Nitrogen-Oxide
Sulfur-Dioxide
Black Carbon
Non-Methane
Ammonia
Methane
Volatile
PM2.5
PM10
Baseline
emissions 44.97 14.57 98.50 132.42 112.00 70.05 328.96 1,119.21 218.22 2,725.61 40,150.82
2030/Unit
Air Pollution
Circular
21.98 9.26 53.19 74.18 108.13 59.00 286.36 315.91 194.95 1,127.17 39,420.31
Measures
2030/Unit
All Measures
17.20 5.33 38.71 59.36 107.31 33.55 171.04 230.75 165.28 878.98 32,689.07
2030/Unit
Total Emission
Reduction
(Baseline
Emission - Air 23.00 5.31 45.31 58.24 3.87 11.05 42.60 803.30 23.27 1,598.45 730.51
Pollution
Circular
Measures)
% Reduction 51.14 36.43 46.00 43.98 3.45 15.78 12.95 71.77 10.66 58.65 1.82
Total Emission
Reduction
(Baseline 27.77 9.24 59.80 73.06 4.69 36.50 157.92 888.46 52.94 1,846.63 7,461.75
Emission - All
Measure)
% Reduction 61.75 63.43 60.71 55.17 4.19 52.10 48.01 79.38 24.26 67.75 18.58
By applying LEAP-IBC calculation based on the best available data, the estimation of air
pollutant emission scenario in 2030 and the potential emission reduction through implementing
measures are illustrated. According to the above table, the baseline emission in 2030 (Business as
Usual Scenario) are highlighted summary, the highest air pollutants emitting in 2030 is CO2
(40,150.82Thousand MT) following by CO (2,725.61Thousand MT). For particular matter PM2.5
and PM10 are estimated increasing up to 98.5Thousand MT and 132.42Thousand MT, respectively.
Other key air pollutants are also presented such as Black Carbon = 14.57 Thousand MT, SO2 = 70.05
Thousand MT, NO2 = 328.96 Thousand MT.
100
PM2.5 Emission
80
60
40
20
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Baseline Air Pollution Circular All Measure
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Baseline Air Pollution Circular All Measure
250
200
150
100
50
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Baseline Air Pollution Circular All Measure
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Baseline Air Pollution Circular All Measure
350
300
Methane Emission
250
200
150
100
50
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Baseline Air Pollution Circular All Measure
According to the table “Summary of baseline and nationally avoided emission” above, the
implementation of the mitigation measures as targeted in the plan could make a significant
reduction in emission of air pollutants, short-lived climate pollutants and greenhouse gases. The
effect that these emission reductions would have on the concentration of fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) in Cambodia, and the health impacts associated with exposure to PM2.5 depends on
several factors.
The first factor is the contribution of emissions from activities to PM2.5 concentrations in
Cambodia. Besides, the human and economic activities within the country the source of emission
pollutants can contribute from international shipping, natural sources and the transport of
emissions from other countries. Meanwhile, the implementation of emission reduction measures
in Cambodia can lead to a substantial contribution to reducing PM2.5 and other air pollutants;
regional emission reductions can also make a significant contribution to achieving this as well if
according to WHO air quality guidelines.
To monitor air quality and especially PM2.5 concentration in ambient air, Cambodia is
installing air quality monitoring equipment. Although the installation of air quality equipment and
stations is still a need of the government, so far Cambodia installed 44 air quality monitoring
equipment across cities central of all provinces. According to 2019 annual report from General
The second factor that determines how the implementation of those measures will affect
PM2.5 concentration in Cambodia is the contribution that emissions of black carbon, organic
carbon, NOx, SO2, NH3 and natural sources make to PM2.5 concentration in the nation. Presently,
there is no study of the composition of PM2.5 to understand this contribution. Yet, the calculation
from LEAP-IBC shows that each of these air pollutants would be significantly reduced (10-60%
in 2030 compared to the baseline scenario) by executing these measures, and therefore a reduction
in PM2.5 concentration would be expected.
Finally, the third factor that determines the effectiveness of these measures is the relationship
between exposure to air pollution and negative health impacts in Cambodia. Although there is
limitation of research on the linkage between air pollution and public health in Cambodia.
However, according to WHO there is evidence of harmful health effects at even very low levels
of PM2.5 exposure; and that in the absence of a threshold for harmful health effects, public health
will benefit from any reduction in PM2.5 concentrations (The Regional Office for Europe of the
World Health Organization, 2013). This refers that by implementing all emission reduction
measures will improve public health in Cambodia.
Exposure to air pollution, in particular fine particulate matter (PM2.5), is associated with
substantial health impacts, primarily through respiratory and cardiovascular diseases (Murray et
al., 2020). PM2.5 air pollution is both directly emitted to the atmosphere, in the form of black
carbon, organic carbon, and dust particulates, and is also formed in the atmosphere from the
emission of gaseous air pollutants including Nitrogen Oxides, Sulphur Dioxide, Ammonia and
NMVOCs. Long-term exposure to elevated PM2.5 concentration significantly increases the risk
of premature death. As a consequence of the emission reductions shown in Section X from the
implementation of the mitigation measures included in Cambodia’s Clean Air Plan, the exposure
of Cambodians to health-damaging levels of air pollutants would be decreased.
To quantify the health benefits that could result from the implementation of the mitigation
measures included in Cambodia’s Clean Air Plan, an air pollution health impact assessment was
undertaken. In the ambient air pollution health impact assessment methods implemented in the
LEAP tool (explained in detail in Kuylenstierna et al., 2020), the health endpoint for which the
impact of ambient (i.e. outdoor) PM2.5 exposure is estimated is premature mortality. Premature
mortality attributable to PM2.5 exposure is estimated for children (less than 5 years) and adults
(>30 years) in − 5- year age groups (30–34, 35-39…75-79, >80 years) from 5 disease categories
Figure 3.6 Overview of LEAP-IBC calculation framework for air pollution health impact
assessment (source: Kuylenstierna et al. 2020).
Where zcf is the PM2.5 low concentration cut-off, z is the PM2.5 concentration that a
population is exposed to, and α, δ, and γ are IER-specific parameters (Burnett et al., 2014; Cohen
et al., 2017). The RR derived from the IER function for a particular disease and age group, is then
used in combination with the baseline mortality rate for that disease for the population in the target
country, and the exposed population in the age category in the target country to estimate the
number of premature deaths attributable to ambient PM2.5 exposure from the particular disease in
that age group (Equation 2).
𝑅𝑅𝐼𝐸𝑅 −1
ΔMort = 𝑦0 ( ) 𝑃𝑜𝑝 Eq. 2
𝑅𝑅𝐼𝐸𝑅
Here y0 is the baseline mortality rate for each disease category, and Pop is the exposed
population for each child or adult age category. Baseline mortality rates for each disease category
were taken from the Global Burden of Disease Results tool (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-
results-tool).
Adjoint coefficients were produced for each pollutant that contributes to population-
weighted annual average PM2.5 concentrations, namely, BC, OC, NOx, SO2, NH3 and other PM
(in this case, predominantly mineral dust), reflecting their different reactivity and formation
pathways in the atmosphere. The adjoint coefficients are applied by multiplying, in each grid and
for each pollutant, the coefficient by emissions, and summing across all grids to estimate the
change in PM2.5PW for a particular year for a particular scenario.
The full implementation of Cambodia’s Clean Air Plan was estimated to reduce population-
weighted PM2.5 concentrations by 4 µg m-3 in 2030 compared to the baseline scenario, a 17%
reduction in total population-weighted PM2.5 concentrations in 2030 compared to the baseline
scenario. This reduction is also a 57% reduction in the contribution of Cambodia’s emissions to
PM2.5 concentrations in Cambodia. This reduction in PM2.5 concentrations across Cambodia
would avoid almost 900 (878) premature deaths per year, 15% of the total health burden from air
pollution, and 57% of the health burden caused by emissions from Cambodia itself.
30.
PM2.5 concentration (µg m -3)
25.
20.
15.
10.
5.
-
Figure 3.7 Population-weighted PM2.5 concentrations for Cambodia from LEAP-IBC for 2010-
2030 for the baseline scenario
20.
15.
10.
5.
Figure 3.8 Reduction in population-weighted PM2.5 concentrations for Cambodia from LEAP-
IBC for 2010-2030 from the implementation of all measures included in Cambodia’s Clean Air
Plan, compared to the baseline scenario
6,000.
5,000.
Premature Deaths
4,000.
3,000.
2,000.
1,000.
-
2013
2015
2017
2019
2010
2011
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
Figure 3.9 Premature deaths attributable to ambient PM2.5 exposure in Cambodia from LEAP-
IBC for 2010-2030 for the baseline scenario
5000
Premature Deaths
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
2012
2022
2029
2010
2011
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2030
Age 30 to 50 years Age 50 to 70 years Less than 5 years
Over 70 years Avoided vs. Baseline
Figure 3.10 Premature deaths attributable to ambient PM2.5 exposure in Cambodia from LEAP-
IBC for 2010-2030 from the implementation of all measures included in Cambodia’s Clean Air
Plan, compared to the baseline scenario
In this section, the implementation of mitigation measures is broken down into several
sectorial actions to tell in what extent the measures could contribute to the reduction of emission,
including the emissions of air pollutants, short-lived climate pollutants and/or greenhouse gases.
Each measure focus on the main sources of pollution such as transport and industrial, residential,
construction and waste sectors. In Air Pollution Circular Measure, there is a measure for an
alternative energy option. However, there appear to be some challenges due to insufficient of
resource, both human and financial resource.
The emission is associated with a wide range of negative health effects, including premature
mortality due to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and lung cancer, and non-fatal health
outcomes including asthma and other respiratory conditions in adults and children. In their most
recent comprehensive review of health effects of air pollution. To cope with this, the
administration of air pollutants from vehicles, fuel quality is required.
Carbon Dioxide
Nitrogen Oxide
Volatile Organic
Sulfur-Dioxide
Black Carbon
Non-Methane
Compounds
Ammonia
Branches
Methane
PM2.5
PM10
Baseline
emissions 9.07 5.93 21.35 21.35 0.57 8.15 268.50 805.42 7.87 1818.19 27497.56
(2030)
20
15
10
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Baseline Air Pollution Circular All Measure
Cambodia is not heavily industrialized country and most of the industries are garment
factories. There is also light industry such as food and beverages, wood products, rubber
manufacturing, etc. and by 2020, the 796 factories in Phnom Penh. Several fuel types (coal, petroleum
products, biomass, and electricity) is used for the industrial sector. The coal consumption is an
increasing trend over time due to the investment on the thermal coal power plant in Cambodia and
expecting in a growing trend in the future. Industrial development is one of the key factors for
economic development of Cambodia which is, to some extent, leading to increase the level of air
pollution such as SOx, NOx, CO etc.
In order to protect the human health and minimize the impact on the environment, emission
control from the industrial sector is required, thus the prevention and end-of-pipe control is needed.
The prevention focuses on minimizing all possible emissions in place through modifying the
manufacturing processes while the control focus on the technic to trap or destroy the pollutants. It
is mentioned in article 24 of sub-degree on The Control of Air Pollution and Noise Disturbance
about role and responsibility of the pollution source owners to control the pollution in place.
Industry
Organic Carbon (MT)
Non-Methane Volatile
Nitrogen Oxide (MT)
Organic Compounds
Sulfur-Dioxide (MT)
Black Carbon (MT)
Carbon Monoxide
(Thousand MT)
(Thousand MT)
(Thousand MT)
Carbon Dioxide
Ammonia (MT)
Methane (MT)
PM2.5 (MT)
PM10 (MT)
Branches
Baseline
emissions 3,167.97 1,843.90 6,433.66 6,576.93 11.48 8,637.63 11,866.26 13.27 1,336.38 26.84 1,308.05
(2030)
Implementation
of all
mitigation 1,547.59 900.75 3,142.95 3,212.93 12.22 8,438.96 5,806.40 12.97 1,305.64 26.22 1,277.96
measures
(2030)
Emission
reduction
(Baseline
1,620.38 943.15 3,290.71 3,364.00 -0.74 198.67 6,059.86 0.30 30.74 0.62 30.09
emissions - all
mitigation
measures)
% Reduction 51.14 51.14 51.14 51.14 -6.45 2.30 51.07 2.26 2.30 2.31 2.30
The economic development and population growth affect on electricity consumption. The
electricity generation increased almost 5 times between 2010 and 2015 and above 2 times higher
in 2015 as compared to 2014 (of 2,981 GWh). For electricity generation, the energy for lighting,
cooling and for equipment is the main source emitting air pollutants. In order to protect the human
health and minimize the impact on the environment, emission control from residential sector is
required. The mitigation measures focus on minimizing all possible emissions in place through
improving energy efficiency.
Electricity Generation
Non-Methane Volatile
Black Carbon (MT)
Ammonia (MT)
Methane (MT)
PM2.5 (MT)
PM10 (MT)
Branches
MT)
MT)
MT)
Baseline
emissions 20.74 16.29 412.14 853.05 19.67 44.65 21.94 135.31 106.59 846.76 8,698.47
(2030)
Implementation
of all
mitigation 8.78 8.98 209.75 390.38 14.73 20.94 8.54 56.89 48.34 358.08 3,447.86
measures
(2030)
Emission
reduction
(Baseline
11.96 7.31 202.39 462.67 4.94 23.71 13.40 78.42 58.25 488.68 5,250.61
emissions - all
mitigation
measures)
% Reduction 57.67 44.87 49.11 54.24 25.11 53.10 61.08 57.96 54.65 57.71 60.36
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Baseline All Mesure
40
30
20
10
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Baseline All Mesure
For residential sector, the energy for cooking and lighting is the main source emitting air
pollutants. The consumption of the electricity as the lighting source at households was increased
gradually from 75 ktoe in 2010 to 131 ktoe in 2015. For cooking, solid fuels (firewood and
charcoal) remained shared the largest fuel mixed in Cambodia and followed by LPG. In order to
protect the human health and minimize the impact on the environment, emission control from
residential sector is required. The mitigation measures focus on minimizing all possible emissions
in place through improving cooking stove and shifting from bio-mass to bio-gas.
Non-Methane Volatile
Organic Compounds
Carbon Monoxide
Organic Carbon
Carbon Dioxide
Nitrogen-Oxide
Sulfur-Dioxide
Black Carbon
Ammonia
Methane
PM2.5
PM10
Baseline
emissions 13.89 4.19 32.00 39.86 4.34 3.96 10.83 128.78 24.19 406.34 24.20
2030/Unit
Air Pollution
Circular
4.24 1.42 9.84 12.16 1.43 1.30 3.59 39.60 7.97 149.54 69.14
Measures
2030/Unit
Total
Emission
Reduction
9.65 2.77 22.16 27.70 2.90 2.67 7.24 89.17 16.22 256.80 -44.94
(Baseline
Emission -
All Measure)
% Reduction 69.47 66.05 69.26 69.49 66.99 67.32 66.87 69.25 67.05 63.20 -185.71
30
25
20
15
10
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Baseline Air Pollution Circular
In Cambodia, charcoal making was assumed still processed in traditional kilns with very
low efficiency (11.43%) was used for transformation wood to charcoal. This traditional method of
charcoal making shows the largest pollution was carbon monoxides. There is currently no
regulation in place to address emissions from charcoal making. In order to alleviate the air
pollution emission from this source for public health and environmental sake, improving efficiency
of charcoal production through enhancing charcoal kiln efficiency is required.
Table 4.10 Emission reductions for charcoal making mitigation measures by pollutant
Clean Air Plan of Cambodia 69
Charcoal Making
Non-Methane Volatile
Organic Compounds
Carbon Monoxide
Organic Carbon
Sulfur-Dioxide
Black Carbon
Ammonia
Methane
PM2.5
PM10
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
Baseline emissions
4,589 676 9,248 9,248 1,316 2,047 116,670 47,664 344,318
2030/Unit
All Measures 2030/Unit 1,748 257 3,524 3,524 501 780 44,451 18,160 131,185
Total Emission
Reduction (Baseline 2,841 419 5,724 5,724 815 1,267 72,219 29,504 213,133
Emission - All Measure)
% Reduction 61.91 61.98 61.89 61.89 61.93 61.90 61.90 61.90 61.90
The implementation of the mitigation measures in charcoal making, in particular the implement
of controlling pollution sources as stated in the mitigation measures suggested by expert from
Stockholm University could lead to significantly decrease of 61.91% of organic carbon, 61.98%
of black carbon, 61.89% of PM 2.5,61.93 of ammonia, and 61.90% of sulfur dioxide, NMVOC,
methane and carbon monoxides.
Within the processes, include earthmovings, tunnel and bridge works, transportation of
materials, concrete production, and operation of machines and equipment generate wastes and
pollution. Minimizing the impacts to the environmental is a challenging task to achieve. Among
those impacts, emissions of particulate matter, such as particulate matter with a particle size that
is less than ten microns in size (PM10), and gases released by the machineries and equipment used
during construction play a significant role to lower air quality. Even though the emissions are
temporary, significant impact is still there and thus, properly measure and mitigation are needed.
There shall be a reinforcement on the management of dust or particulate matter into the air and
other discharges from pollutant sources, such as construction sites, concrete production sites,
transport of pebble sand, cement or other construction materials by means to require prior tire
cleaning from the production sites, installation of high pressure steam spray, and apply the proper
tire cover before leaving out from the business sites in order to avoid any spills or crumbs and
dusty or particulate matter in to the roads. On the other hand, there shall be a reinforcement on
the inspection and strengthening the education to all construction site owners.
Construction
Non-Methane Volatile
Organic Compounds
Carbon Monoxide
Organic Carbon
Carbon Dioxide
Nitrogen Oxide
Sulfur-Dioxide
Black Carbon
Ammonia
Branches
Methane
(TMT)
PM2.5
PM10
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
(MT)
Baseline
emissions - - 2222.5 22225 - - - - - - -
(2030)
Air circular
measures - - 1666.9 16669 - - - - - - -
(2030)
Emission
reduction
(Baseline
emissions - - - 555.62 5556.4 - - - - - - -
all
mitigation
measures)
% Reduction - - 25 25 - - - - - - -
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Baseline emissions (2030) Air circular measures (2030) Implementation of all mitigation measures
Emissions from open burning are typically affected by many variables including wind,
ambient temperature, moisture content of the debris burned, composition and compactness of the
pile. Generally, the relatively low temperatures burning, for instance open burning, increase
emissions of particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and hydrocarbons and suppress emissions of
nitrogen oxides. The open burning can be categorized as open burning of biomass fuel (agricultural
residue wastes, forest fire, etc.) and solid anthrophonic fuel open burning (for example, household
solid waste). The open burning, which is not an ideal combustion, generally produces soot and
particulate matter (PM) that can be found in form of smoke plume, carbon monoxide (CO),
methane (CH4) and other light hydrocarbons etc. Open burning emissions are troubling from a
public health perspective because during open burning, the emissions are not released through tall
stacks which aid dispersion, but it stays at or near the ground level. It is not spread evenly
throughout the year but they are typically episodic in time or season and also
localized/regionalized.
Nitrogen-Oxide
Sulfur-Dioxide
Black Carbon
Non-Methane
Compounds
Ammonia
Branches
Methane
PM2.5
PM10
Baseline
emissions 11.98 1.49 22.29 27.06 2.55 1.14 11.15 51.38 8.32 86.4 -
(2030)
Air circular
measures 5.99 0.75 11.15 13.53 1.28 0.57 5.58 25.69 4.16 43.2 -
(2030)
Emission
reduction
(Baseline
emissions - 5.99 0.74 11.14 13.53 1.27 0.57 5.57 25.69 4.16 43.2 -
all
mitigation
measure)
20
15
10
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Baseline Air Pollution Circular
Figure 4.12 PM2.5 reductions from open waste burning mitigation measures
80
60
40
20
0
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Baseline Air Pollution Circular
Through the implementation of the mitigation measures in the waste sector, the emissions
reduction from waste sector by 2030 will be 50% for Methane, 50% for Carbon Monoxide, 50%
for PM10 and 49.98 % for PM 2.5. There reduction in of pollutants is observed after in 2020 due
to the implementation of a measure that would stop burning of municipal waste. This is will be an
effective measure which provide immediate results in reducing emissions in this sector.
Appropriate ambient air quality monitoring is required to tell the nature of the air pollution
using air quality index and make good quality data available to the public. With real-time ambient
air quality monitoring, the information on pollution compositions, concentration, source sector
will be known. The data from the monitoring are of important to map the trends and seasonal
variations in air quality, to alert to public to take action on days with high levels of pollution, and
to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of mitigation measures.
Air pollutant emission inventory, an indispensable tool for a wide range of environmental
measures, is a scientific tool available for the management of the atmospheric environment. With
the inventory, the types of activities that cause emissions, the chemical or physical identity of
the pollutants included and the quantity thereof, the geographic area covered, the time period over
which emissions are estimated and the methodology used are determined. The inventory, which is
developed within the national planning process, is of critical important in the process of
monitoring, evaluating, reviewing and updating the air quality plan. The inventory development
process will be updated every 5 years to allow the implementation of the plan to be tracked.
5.3 Identifying the air quality goal and timeframe for achievement
It is essential to establish specific air quality goals. The emission inventory is an important
baseline information for estimating future emissions by projection based on the changes in socio-
economic indices (e.g. economic growth, population growth, changes in energy use…), emission
factors (e.g. after the introduction of better control measures), fuel substitution and so on. The
estimation of future emissions provides important information for setting emissions targets and
time needed to achieve the target, for example, a reduction of 35 % of PM 2.5 by 2030 in Phnom Penh.
5.4 Conducting air quality modelling and identifying new emission reduction strategies in
order to achieve the air quality goal
Existing technology is accessed to improve and maintain air pollution, GHG emission
inventory and projections. Data on emissions play a role as the input for atmospheric transport and
deposition models. The concentration and deposition can be estimated by modeling, in comparison
with the monitoring data on the ground and/or from satellite, will be of important information for
decision-making regarding to air quality management. The air quality modelling, like the
mentioned in this document, will enable to understand how the implementation of programs will
contribute to achieving the air quality goal.
Other than to setting an emission standard, regulations should reflect the country’s context
after have been oversaw from different point of view, best match to available technology, and
needs to include source monitoring and reporting requirements. Proposed regulations should
undergo a reasonable commenting period with approval from relevant stakeholders.
Permit is an effective tool to ensure that the emission source owner have enough knowledge
and understanding regarding to air pollution control requirements they have to fulfill. For example,
renewing permits for vehicles that comply with the national vehicle emission standards, the
renewing of air emission from manufacturing, the implementation of monitoring plan or spot check
the see if the pollution source owners have really complied with the existing frameworks they are
supposed to fulfill.
5.7 Monitor implementation of air pollution mitigation measures identified in this plan
An emission inventory provides the baseline information that enables the likely effects of
introducing of various prevention and control measures with several sectors to be assessed and
compared between now and what it supposes to be in the future. Based on knowledge on costs of
each options, decision-maker will be able to select the most the effective and efficiency emission
reduction measures. The emission inventory data play a role as an index which share some
similarities to those used in economic trend. The trend allows us to judge whether we should
introduce or reinforce regulations, economic measures or technical measures to control air
pollutant emissions.
Review and update Air Pollution Action Plan every 5 years to ensure that all relevant
corporate strategies and policies and the implemented mitigation measures reflect the importance
of improving local air quality and reducing exposure in the country.
Continue to trial low and • Take all opportunities to trial • Ministry of Ongoing
zero emission and evaluate new low and zero Environment
technology emission • Ministry of
• Promote new low and zero Industry, Science,
emission among sectors Technology and
Innovation
• Ministry of
Agriculture
Forestry and
Fishery
• Academic
institutions/environ
mental companies
Burnett, R.T., Pope C. Arden, I.I.I., et al, 2014. An Integrated Risk Function for Estimating the
Global Burden of Disease Attributable to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Exposure.
Environ. Health Perspect. 122, 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307049
Cohen, A.J., Brauer, M., Burnett, R.T., 2017. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden
of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: An analysis of data from the Global burden
of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet In press, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-
6736(17)30505-6
EDC. (2010-2015). Annual Report. Electricite Du Cambodge (EDC).
Heaps, C.G., 2016. Long-range Energy Alternatives Planning (LEAP) system. [Software version:
2018.1.38] Stockholm Environment Institute. Somerville, MA, USA.
https://www.energycommunity.org
IGES & UNEP. (2018). State of Waste Management in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. United
Kuylenstierna, J.C.I., Heaps, C.G., Ahmed, T., Vallack, H.W., Hicks, W.K., Ashmore, M.R.,
Malley, C.S., Wang, G., Lefèvre, E.N., Anenberg, S.C., Lacey, F., Shindell, D.T.,
Bhattacharjee, U., Henze, D.K., 2020. Development of the Low Emissions Analysis
Platform – Integrated Benefits Calculator (LEAP-IBC) tool to assess air quality and
climate co-benefits: Application for Bangladesh. Environ. Int. 145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106155
MAFF. (2011-2016). Annual Summary Report of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing. Ministry of
Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing.
MLMUPC. (2009-2019). Annual Summary Report of Land Management, Urban Planning and
Construction. Ministry of Land Management, Urban Planning and Construction.
MME & CERIA. (2016). Cambodia Nation Energy Statistics. National Library of Indonesia
Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. 62
MOP. (2013). Economic Census of Cambodia 2011: 12 Phnom Penh Municipality, Provincial
Report. Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC).
Murray, C.J.L., Aravkin, A.Y., Zheng, et al., 2020. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204
countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of
Disease Study 2019. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2
NIS & MOP. (2013). Cambodia Inter-censal Population Survey 2013.
https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/content/air-pollution-measures-asia-and-pacific
The UNEP (2018) Report ’Air Pollution in Asia and the Pacific: Science-based Solutions’ 25
policy and technology clean air measures that could help achieve safe air quality levels for 1 billion
people by 2030 – with numerous benefits for public health, economic development and the climate.
https://ccacoalition.org/en/solutions
The technical working group has duty to perform the task as follow:
1. Participating in activities that are essential to run the project implementation smoothly
2. Establishing an inter-ministerial SLCP working group including terms of reference of the
working group and operational modality
3. Establishing communication network and information sharing mechanisms including
development of national knowledge exchange network platform on CCAC/SLCPs
4. Conducting consultation workshops, awareness workshop and public campaigns on SLCPs
for the stakeholders
5. Develop training materials, leaflet, and brochure on SLCPs and its implications, benefits
of reductions
6. Developing national framework and guideline/guidance on CCAC initiatives, SLCPs
mitigation strategy and action plans
7. Conducting an assessment on status of knowledge and level of recognition of stakeholders
on SLCPs
8. Identify potential sectors and list of actions to reduce short-lived climate pollutants
9. Participating in LEAP IBC training and developing a national black carbon inventory
covering key sectors
10. Mainstreaming CCAC initiatives including SLCPs mitigation strategy and plans into
sectoral/ national strategy and action plans of government institution/ ministries.
Aviation
Number of
domestic and
international flights
per year
Total fuel used (or
fuel sold) for
domestic and
international
flights.
Fraction of waste
collected disposed
in landfill
Fraction of waste
that is organic
Carbon Monoxide
Volatile Organic
Organic Carbon
Nitrogen Oxides
Carbon Dioxide
Sulfur Dioxide
Black Carbon
Non Methane
Compounds
Ammonia
Methane
PM2.5
PM10
Scenario
2015 31.8 8.5 68.1 124.9 32.9 83.9 127.0 462.2 304.4 1234.2 13608.1
Baseline 2030 45.0 14.6 98.5 112.0 70.0 132.4 329.0 1,119.2 218.2 2,725.6 40,150.8
Construction Controls 45.0 14.6 97.9 112.0 70.0 126.9 329.0 1,119.2 218.2 2,725.6 40,150.8
Euro 4 Buses 45.0 14.0 97.4 112.0 70.0 131.3 314.8 1,116.7 218.2 2,718.6 39,884.1
Euro 4 Freight 44.7 12.6 94.5 112.0 69.7 128.4 249.2 1,109.4 218.2 2,699.4 39,047.6
Euro 4 cars 44.8 14.4 98.1 112.4 69.9 132.0 306.5 1,092.9 218.0 2,521.4 39,715.1
Euro III Motorcycles 37.8 12.9 87.4 112.0 70.0 121.3 319.2 457.6 215.6 1,637.1 39,983.3
Improved Charcoal 42.1 14.2 92.8 111.2 68.8 126.7 328.6 1,047.0 188.7 2,512.5 40,150.8
Industrial Emission Controls 43.4 13.6 95.3 112.0 70.0 129.1 323.0 1,119.2 218.2 2,725.6 40,150.8
More efficient biomass stoves 45.0 14.6 98.5 112.0 70.0 132.4 329.0 1,119.2 218.2 2,725.6 40,150.8
NDC Energy Efficiency 44.9 14.5 98.3 112.0 59.5 132.1 323.6 1,118.9 218.2 2,724.8 38,110.4
NDC Renewable Electricity Generation 45.0 14.6 98.4 112.0 52.4 132.1 318.0 1,119.1 218.2 2,725.2 35,900.6
Open Waste Burning 39.0 13.8 87.4 110.7 69.5 118.9 323.4 1,093.5 214.1 2,682.4 40,150.8
Sulphur Fuel Quality 45.0 14.6 98.5 112.0 62.2 132.4 329.0 1,119.2 218.2 2,725.6 40,150.8
Switch biomass to gas stoves 35.3 11.8 76.3 109.1 67.4 104.7 321.7 1,030.0 202.0 2,468.8 40,195.8
Switch to public transport 45.0 14.6 98.6 112.0 70.0 132.5 329.1 1,116.1 218.1 2,699.5 39,935.0
Tour bus standards 45.0 14.6 98.5 112.0 70.0 132.4 329.0 1,119.2 218.2 2,725.6 40,150.8
Air Pollution Circular 22.0 9.3 53.2 108.1 59.0 74.2 286.4 315.9 195.0 1,127.2 39,420.3
All Measures 17.2 5.3 38.7 107.3 33.5 59.4 171.0 230.7 165.3 879.0 32,689.1
Carbon Monoxide
Volatile Organic
Organic Carbon
Nitrogen Oxides
Carbon Dioxide
Sulfur Dioxide
Black Carbon
Non Methane
Compounds
Ammonia
Methane
PM2.5
PM10
Scenario
2015
Baseline 2030
Construction Controls - - 0.6 - - 4.2 - - - - -
Euro 4 Buses -0.0 3.7 1.1 - 0.1 0.8 4.3 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.7
Euro 4 Freight 0.7 13.5 4.1 - 0.5 3.1 24.3 0.9 0.0 1.0 2.7
Euro 4 cars 0.4 1.4 0.4 -0.3 0.2 0.3 6.8 2.4 0.1 7.5 1.1
Euro III Motorcycles 16.0 11.3 11.3 0.0 0.1 8.4 3.0 59.1 1.2 39.9 0.4
Improved Charcoal 6.3 2.9 5.8 0.7 1.8 4.3 0.1 6.5 13.5 7.8 -
Industrial Emission Controls 3.5 6.3 3.3 - - 2.5 1.8 - - - -
More efficient biomass stoves - - - - - - - - - - -
NDC Energy Efficiency 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 15.0 0.3 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1
NDC Renewable Electricity Generation 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 25.2 0.3 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6
Open Waste Burning 13.3 5.1 11.3 1.1 0.8 10.2 1.7 2.3 1.9 1.6 -
Sulphur Fuel Quality - - - - 11.1 - - - - - -
Switch biomass to gas stoves 21.4 19.0 22.5 2.6 3.8 20.9 2.2 8.0 7.4 9.4 -0.1
Switch to public transport 0.0 -0.3 -0.1 0.0 0.1 -0.1 -0.1 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.5
Tour bus standards - - - - - - - - - - -
Air Pollution Circular 51.1 36.4 46.0 3.5 15.8 44.0 12.9 71.8 10.7 58.6 1.8
All Measures 61.7 63.4 60.7 4.2 52.1 55.1 48.0 79.4 24.3 67.8 18.6