MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: JEWEN L. ALIMEN Name of Rater: NEVILLA S. SISON

Position: TEACHER II Position: HEAD TEACHER II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content Applied 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educati Knowledge knowledge of Tool (COT) rating sheet or
on and content within Inter-Observer Agreement
Service Pedagogy and across Form from an online
s curriculum observation of online
teaching areas synchronous teaching (online
teaching or two-way radio
instruction)

2. If option 1 is not possible,

video or audio lesson that is
Efficiency
SLM-base or aligned with
MELC

3. If option 1 & 2 are not

possible, go for observation
on demonstration teaching
via LAC Session

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used One (1) lesson plan with Quality
Educati research-based annotations in learning
on knowledge and objectives, activities, and
Service principles of assessments explaining how
s teaching and they reflect teaching
learning to principles.
enhance
professional NOTE: Cite sources and
practice references in LP and not the
activity of the learner

Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic Displayed 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educati Proficient use of Tool (COT) rating sheet or
on Mother Tongue, Inter-Observer Agreement
Service Filipino and Form from an online
s English to observation of online
facilitate synchronous teaching (online
teaching and teaching or two-way radio
learning instruction)
2. If option 1 is not possible,
video or audio lesson that is
SLM-base or aligned with
MELC
3. If option 1 & 2 are not
possible, go for observation
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
on demonstration teaching via Efficiency
LAC Session

Timeliness
Basic 4.Used effective 1. 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educati verbal and non- Tool (COT) rating sheet or
on verbal Inter-Observer Agreement
Service classroom Form from an online
s communication observation of online
strategies to synchronous teaching
support learner
(online teaching or two- Efficiency
understanding,
way radio instruction)
participation,
engagement, 2. 2. If option 1 is not
and achievement possible, video or audio
lesson that is SLM-base or
aligned with MELC
3. 3. If option 1 & 2 are not
possible, go for
observation on Timeliness
demonstration teaching
via LAC Session

Basic Established safe 1. Classroom Observation Quality

Educati 2. Learning and secure Tool (COT) rating sheet or
on Environment learning Inter-Observer Agreement
Service and Diversity environments to Form from an online
s of Learners enhance observation of online
learning through synchronous teaching (online
the consistent teaching or two-way radio
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
implementation instruction) Efficiency
of policies, 2. If option 1 is not possible,
guidelines, and video or audio lesson that is
procedure. SLM-base or aligned with
MELC
1. 3. If option 1 & 2 are not
possible, go for
observation on
demonstration teaching
via LAC Session

Timeliness
Basic 6. Maintained 1. 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educati learning Tool (COT) rating sheet or
on environments Inter-Observer Agreement
Service that promote Form from an online
s fairness, observation of online
respect, and synchronous teaching
care to
(online teaching or two-
encourage
way radio instruction)
learning
2. 2. If option 1 is not
possible, video or audio Efficiency
lesson that is SLM-base or
aligned with MELC
3. 3. If option 1 & 2 are not
possible, go for
observation on
demonstration teaching
via LAC Session

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 7. Maintained 1. 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educati learning Tool (COT) rating sheet or
on environments Inter-Observer Agreement
Service that nurture and Form from an online
s inspire learners observation of online
to participate, synchronous teaching
cooperate and (online teaching or two-
collaborate in way radio instruction)
continued 2. 2. If option 1 is not
learning possible, video or audio
lesson that is SLM-base or
aligned with MELC Efficiency
3. 3. If option 1 & 2 are not
possible, go for
observation on
demonstration teaching
via LAC Session

Timeliness
8.Applied a 1. 1. Classroom Observation Quality
range of Tool (COT) rating sheet or
successful Inter-Observer Agreement
strategies that Form from an online
maintain observation of online
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
learning synchronous teaching Efficiency
environments (online teaching or two-
that motivate way radio instruction)
learners to work 2. 2. If option 1 is not
productively by possible, video or audio
assuming lesson that is SLM-base or
responsibility for
aligned with MELC
their own Timeliness
3. 3. If option 1 & 2 are not
3. Curriculum learning
and Planning possible, go for
observation on
demonstration teaching
via LAC Session

Basic 9. Designed, 1. 2 Teachers Reflection Quality

Educati adapted and Forms
on implemented 2. 2 Certification from the
Service teaching School Head
s strategies that 3. (No identified
are responsive learners with
to learners disabilities nor
with disabilities, giftedness)
giftedness, and Efficiency
talents

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 10. Adapted and Quality
Educati used culturally
on appropriate 2 Teachers Reflection Forms
Service teaching
2 Certification from the School
s strategies to
address Head

( No identified learners
belonging to Indigenous
Groups)

Efficiency

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 11. Adapted and ALL MOVs 1-4 are needed: Quality
Educati implemented Any Learning Program
on learning ( remedial, enrichment,
Service programs that intervention module, SIM with
s ensure the following MOVs:
relevance and 1. Action Plan / Activity
responsiveness Plan Efficiency
to the needs of 2. Accomplishment Report
all learners 3. Progress Report
4. Proof of Evaluation (the
. proponent should evaluate
their progress)
* Individual Learning Timeliness
Monitoring Plan*
Basic 12. Utilized Identified least/most mastered Quality
Educati assessment data skills based on –Item Analysis
on to inform the (1st-4th) with any of the
Service modification of following supporting MOVs
s teaching and
learning 1. Accomplishment report for
practices and remedial/ enhancement
programs activities(e.g., remedial
sessions, Summer Reading Efficiency
.
Camp, Phil-IRI based reading
program)( 5pts.)

2. Intervention material used for

remediation/reinforcement/enha
ncement(4pts)

3. Lesson plan/activity log for

remediation/ enhancement
(3pts.)
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. Community 13. Maintained A LEARNING PROGRAM Quality
Educati linkages and learning which involves internal and
on professional environments external stakeholders with the
Service engagement that are ff. MOVs: (ALL MOVs are
s & personal responsive to needed)
growth and community
professional contexts 1. Accomplishment report of a
development program/project/activity that Efficiency
maintains a learning
environment
2. Program/Project/Activity plan
on maintaining a learning
environment
3. Minutes of a consultative
meeting/community
stakeholders meeting about a
program/project/activity that Timeliness
maintains a learning
environment with proof of
attendance
4. Communication letter about a
program/project/activity that
maintains a learning
environment

Basic 14. Reviewed 1. Annotated video/audio Quality

Education regularly recording of one’s teaching
Services personal that shows impact of regularly
reviewing one’s teaching
teaching practice/s
practice using
 existing laws 2. Annotated teaching Efficiency
and regulations materials that shows impact
that apply to the of regularly reviewing one’s
teaching teaching practice/s: Lesson
profession and plan, Activity sheet,
the Assessment materials, Others
responsibilities (Please specify)
Timeliness
specified in the 3. Personal reflection
Code of Ethics 4. Proof of attendance in LAC,
for Professional coaching or mentoring
Teachers sessions
.
Basic 15. Complied A PROGRAM sustaining the Quality
Education with and engagement of stakeholders
Services implemented with the ff. MOVs:
school policies
and procedures (ALL MOVs are needed)
consistently to
foster 1. Proof of
harmonious participation/involvement in a
relationships school-community Efficiency
with learners, partnership for the
parents, and implementation of a school
other policy/procedure (e.g.,
stakeholders certificate as committee
member, narrative report)
.
2. Minutes of parent-teacher
conference/stakeholder’s
meeting about an
implemented school
Timeliness
policy/procedure with proof of
attendance

3. Communication letter about

an implemented school
policy/procedure sent to
parent/guardian
Basic 16. Applied a One (1) lesson plan with Quality
Education personal annotations in learning
Services philosophy of objectives, activities, and
teaching that is assessments explaining how
learner-centered they reflect the chosen
learner-centered teaching
philosophy
Efficiency

Timeliness

Basic 4.Community 17. Adopted 1. Documented feedback from Quality

Education Linkages and practices that superiors, colleagues,
Services professional uphold the learners, parents/guardians,
engagement dignity of or other stakeholders directly
& personal teaching as a reflecting the ratee’s good
growth and profession by practices that uphold the
professional exhibiting dignity of teaching as a Efficiency
development qualities such as profession OR
caring attitude, 2. Annotated evidence of
respect, and practice indirectly linking to
integrity.. the upholding of dignity of
teaching as profession by
exhibiting qualities such as Timeliness
caring attitude, respect and
integrity.
• Screenshot of
text
messages/chat
/email or any
form of
communicatio
n with
 parents/guardi
ans or learners
(name or any
identifies
removed)
• Remarks from
mentor/master
teachers/scho
ol head about
one’s qualities
(e.g., entries in
Performance
Monitoring and
Coaching
Form (PMCF)
or Mid-year
Review Form
• Recognition
form the
school/school
community
about one’s
qualities
(MOVs should came from
different stakeholders)

Basic 18. Set 1. Updated IPCRF-DP from Quality

Education professional Phase II
Services development
goals based on 2. Mid-year Review Form
the Philippine (MRF)
Professional
Standards for 3. IPCRF-DP
Teachers
 . 4. Certification from the ICT Efficiency
Coordinator/School
Head/Focal Person in charge
of e-SAT

Timeliness
Basic 5.Plus Factor 19. Performed  Committee Quality
Education various related involvement
Services works/activities
that contribute  Advisorship of co-
to the teaching- curricular activities
learning process  Involvement as
module/ learning
material writer Efficiency

 Involvement as
module/learning
material validator
 Book or journal
authorship/contributor
ship
 Participation in the
RO/SDO/school- Timeliness
initiated TV-/radio-
based instruction
 Coordinatorship/
chairpersonship
 Coaching and
mentoring learners in
competitions
 Mentoring pre-service
teachers
 Participation in
 demonstration
teaching
 Participation as
research presenter in
a forum/ conference

NEVILLA S. SISON JEWEN L. ALIMEN MA. LORENIA R. SALES

Rater Ratee Approving Authority